Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_39_22
Lalwani Jaya, A. Sashank, Katari Sruthi
We present a case of a 28-year-old pregnant patient in labor with two prior cesarean sections with a history of both successful and failed spinal anesthesia in her first and second pregnancies, respectively. This time, attempts at spinal anesthesia failed twice despite ruling out the common causes such as technical or drug error. Surgery was ultimately performed under general anesthesia uneventfully. While technical factors may contribute substantially to failure of spinal anesthesia, the sequence of events in this case, viz. one successful subarachnoid block followed by two unsuccessful ones three and seven years apart, supported by investigative evidence, indicates a possible acquired resistance to local anesthetics.
{"title":"Apparent acquired resistance to local anesthetics in a pregnant patient: Coincidence or a novel entity?—A Case report","authors":"Lalwani Jaya, A. Sashank, Katari Sruthi","doi":"10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_39_22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_39_22","url":null,"abstract":"We present a case of a 28-year-old pregnant patient in labor with two prior cesarean sections with a history of both successful and failed spinal anesthesia in her first and second pregnancies, respectively. This time, attempts at spinal anesthesia failed twice despite ruling out the common causes such as technical or drug error. Surgery was ultimately performed under general anesthesia uneventfully. While technical factors may contribute substantially to failure of spinal anesthesia, the sequence of events in this case, viz. one successful subarachnoid block followed by two unsuccessful ones three and seven years apart, supported by investigative evidence, indicates a possible acquired resistance to local anesthetics.","PeriodicalId":16611,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care","volume":"13 1","pages":"109 - 111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44833547","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_4_22
Y. Patil, Abhilasha D Motghare, Dhwani Walavalkar, I. Chincholi
Introduction: Placenta accreta is a general term, when part of the placenta or the entire placenta invades and is inseparable from the uterine wall. The incidence is considerably higher in women with both a previous caesarean delivery and placenta praevia, occurring in around 1 in every 20 such women. Resorption of the retained, poorly perfused placenta can be augmented by concurrent treatment with methotrexate when fertility is desired. In cases where operative measures are required, placement of Internal Iliac artery (IIA) balloons preoperatively and their inflation intraoperatively, reduces maternal morbidity and mortality. Materials and Methodology: We present a case series of 14 patients with placenta accreta diagnosed preoperatively, 7 of whom had IIA balloons placed before undergoing Caesarean section and 7 did not have such an intervention. The maternal and foetal morbidity and mortality were studied, including the need for blood and blood product transfusions. Results: Internal Iliac Balloon placements did not change the requirement for blood and blood product transfudion in both groups. The group who had IIA balloon placed preoperatively had better maternal and fetal outcome as compared to the group who had no such intervention.
{"title":"Retrospective observational case series of management of placenta accreta at tertiary care institution","authors":"Y. Patil, Abhilasha D Motghare, Dhwani Walavalkar, I. Chincholi","doi":"10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_4_22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_4_22","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Placenta accreta is a general term, when part of the placenta or the entire placenta invades and is inseparable from the uterine wall. The incidence is considerably higher in women with both a previous caesarean delivery and placenta praevia, occurring in around 1 in every 20 such women. Resorption of the retained, poorly perfused placenta can be augmented by concurrent treatment with methotrexate when fertility is desired. In cases where operative measures are required, placement of Internal Iliac artery (IIA) balloons preoperatively and their inflation intraoperatively, reduces maternal morbidity and mortality. Materials and Methodology: We present a case series of 14 patients with placenta accreta diagnosed preoperatively, 7 of whom had IIA balloons placed before undergoing Caesarean section and 7 did not have such an intervention. The maternal and foetal morbidity and mortality were studied, including the need for blood and blood product transfusions. Results: Internal Iliac Balloon placements did not change the requirement for blood and blood product transfudion in both groups. The group who had IIA balloon placed preoperatively had better maternal and fetal outcome as compared to the group who had no such intervention.","PeriodicalId":16611,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care","volume":"13 1","pages":"71 - 74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47364253","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_42_22
R. Jain, K. Bansal, Kanupriya Jain, M. Singh, A. Grewal
Parturient with kyphoscoliosis poses a major challenge in the administration of spinal anaesthesia owing to changes in the anatomy of the spine and physiological changes associated with pregnancy. Recently, ultrasound guidance has proved to be a boon for regional anaesthesia techniques. We report the successful anaesthetic management of a 43 year-old primigravida with kyphoscoliosis who was posted for emergency caesarean section using an ultrasound-guided subarachnoid block.
{"title":"Ultrasound-guided subarachnoid block in kyphoscoliotic parturient posted for urgent caesarean section","authors":"R. Jain, K. Bansal, Kanupriya Jain, M. Singh, A. Grewal","doi":"10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_42_22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_42_22","url":null,"abstract":"Parturient with kyphoscoliosis poses a major challenge in the administration of spinal anaesthesia owing to changes in the anatomy of the spine and physiological changes associated with pregnancy. Recently, ultrasound guidance has proved to be a boon for regional anaesthesia techniques. We report the successful anaesthetic management of a 43 year-old primigravida with kyphoscoliosis who was posted for emergency caesarean section using an ultrasound-guided subarachnoid block.","PeriodicalId":16611,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care","volume":"13 1","pages":"112 - 115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47418583","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_55_22
Renu Wakhloo, R. Devi, Megha Gandotra, V. Kant
Background: Currently, spinal anesthesia for cesarean section is the anesthetic technique of choice for women with preeclampsia in the absence of contraindications to neuraxial anesthesia. Recently, norepinephrine has been introduced for prevention and treatment of hypotension associated with spinal anesthesia; however, only a couple of studies have compared norepinephrine infusion and bolus. Aims: This study aims to compare primarily the efficacy and safety of norepinephrine bolus given therapeutically and norepinephrine infusion given prophylactically for management of hypotension and effects on other hemodynamic parameters in parturients with preeclampsia undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia and secondarily to determine the effects of study drugs on neonatal Apgar score and arterial blood gas analysis of neonatal blood. Methods: In this prospective randomized study, 100 singleton full-term pregnant females of ASA grade II, aged 18–35 years, diagnosed with preeclampsia (controlled on single antihypertensive drug with BP ≤140/90), scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were randomly divided into two groups. Group A: Received therapeutic norepinephrine bolus (4 μg) only when hypotension (fall in SBP to ≤20% of baseline) was detected after spinal anesthesia. Group B: Received prophylactic intravenous norepinephrine infusion (4 μg/min) immediately after induction of spinal anesthesia. Results: Heart rate, systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure had statistically significant difference at 3,4,5,6,7,8,9, and 10 mins of surgery. Number of episodes of hypotension and number of norepinephrine boluses used in Group A were higher and statistically significant (p-value < 0.001) than Group B. Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes as well as umbilical artery parameters in two groups was comparable and statistically insignificant (p-value 0.301 for Apgar at 1 min and P value 0.562 for Apgar at 5 mins). Conclusion: Although both norepinephrine bolus and infusion doses are an effective way to treat spinal anesthesia-related hypotension in patients with preeclampsia undergoing cesarean section with comparable maternal and fetal side effects, infusion dose of norepinephrine is better in maintaining hemodynamics of parturients with insignificant changes in neonatal outcomes.
{"title":"Comparison of norepinephrine bolus versus infusion for prevention of post-spinal hypotension in parturients with preeclampsia undergoing cesarean section","authors":"Renu Wakhloo, R. Devi, Megha Gandotra, V. Kant","doi":"10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_55_22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_55_22","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Currently, spinal anesthesia for cesarean section is the anesthetic technique of choice for women with preeclampsia in the absence of contraindications to neuraxial anesthesia. Recently, norepinephrine has been introduced for prevention and treatment of hypotension associated with spinal anesthesia; however, only a couple of studies have compared norepinephrine infusion and bolus. Aims: This study aims to compare primarily the efficacy and safety of norepinephrine bolus given therapeutically and norepinephrine infusion given prophylactically for management of hypotension and effects on other hemodynamic parameters in parturients with preeclampsia undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia and secondarily to determine the effects of study drugs on neonatal Apgar score and arterial blood gas analysis of neonatal blood. Methods: In this prospective randomized study, 100 singleton full-term pregnant females of ASA grade II, aged 18–35 years, diagnosed with preeclampsia (controlled on single antihypertensive drug with BP ≤140/90), scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were randomly divided into two groups. Group A: Received therapeutic norepinephrine bolus (4 μg) only when hypotension (fall in SBP to ≤20% of baseline) was detected after spinal anesthesia. Group B: Received prophylactic intravenous norepinephrine infusion (4 μg/min) immediately after induction of spinal anesthesia. Results: Heart rate, systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure had statistically significant difference at 3,4,5,6,7,8,9, and 10 mins of surgery. Number of episodes of hypotension and number of norepinephrine boluses used in Group A were higher and statistically significant (p-value < 0.001) than Group B. Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes as well as umbilical artery parameters in two groups was comparable and statistically insignificant (p-value 0.301 for Apgar at 1 min and P value 0.562 for Apgar at 5 mins). Conclusion: Although both norepinephrine bolus and infusion doses are an effective way to treat spinal anesthesia-related hypotension in patients with preeclampsia undergoing cesarean section with comparable maternal and fetal side effects, infusion dose of norepinephrine is better in maintaining hemodynamics of parturients with insignificant changes in neonatal outcomes.","PeriodicalId":16611,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care","volume":" 9","pages":"80 - 86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41312073","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_33_22
Sandipika Dogra, Kameswari Surampadi, Manokanth Madapu, S. Pandya
The increasing incidence of caesarean section (CS) increases the risk for placenta accrete spectrum (PAS) conditions in pregnancy. The aortic vascular clamps can be used in low resource settings to minimise major obstetric haemorrhage in a parturient with PAS. We report one case of major obstetric haemorrhage attributable to PAS and other cases that had the potential to bleed post-return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). The first case had torrential bleed following classical CS done for percreta leading to severe haemodynamic instability and a near arrest situation despite standard protocolised management. As a last resort to control catastrophic bleeding, the aortic vascular clamp was used to avert an imminent cardiac arrest, which successfully lead to effective resuscitation and later uneventful recovery. The second case was a perimortem caesarean delivery in a diagnosed case of placenta percreta where we contemplated to use this clamp during resuscitative hysterotomy [Perimortem caesarean delivery (PMCD)] as its usage is likely to confer haemodynamic stability post-ROSC bleeding. However, the patient could not be revived. We have found that in addition to anaesthetic and major haemorrhage management skills in tackling a massive obstetric haemorrhage, the availability of trained surgical teams for controlling ongoing haemorrhage is crucial for effective resuscitation. Using aortic and common iliac vascular clamps as a damage control measure also plays a very important role in controlling catastrophic maternal haemorrhage. With the growing incidence of PAS and uncontrolled bleeding in these parturients, the skilled anaesthetic and resuscitative skills of anaesthesiologists are futile if haemorrhage is not controlled. We found that the availability and use of the vascular clamps at the time of PMCD are very useful to control bleeding and help in effective resuscitation. Its use has a short learning curve and the personnel can be trained easily.
{"title":"Vascular clamps in perimortem caesarean delivery in parturients with placenta accreta spectrum: Case report and literature review","authors":"Sandipika Dogra, Kameswari Surampadi, Manokanth Madapu, S. Pandya","doi":"10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_33_22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_33_22","url":null,"abstract":"The increasing incidence of caesarean section (CS) increases the risk for placenta accrete spectrum (PAS) conditions in pregnancy. The aortic vascular clamps can be used in low resource settings to minimise major obstetric haemorrhage in a parturient with PAS. We report one case of major obstetric haemorrhage attributable to PAS and other cases that had the potential to bleed post-return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). The first case had torrential bleed following classical CS done for percreta leading to severe haemodynamic instability and a near arrest situation despite standard protocolised management. As a last resort to control catastrophic bleeding, the aortic vascular clamp was used to avert an imminent cardiac arrest, which successfully lead to effective resuscitation and later uneventful recovery. The second case was a perimortem caesarean delivery in a diagnosed case of placenta percreta where we contemplated to use this clamp during resuscitative hysterotomy [Perimortem caesarean delivery (PMCD)] as its usage is likely to confer haemodynamic stability post-ROSC bleeding. However, the patient could not be revived. We have found that in addition to anaesthetic and major haemorrhage management skills in tackling a massive obstetric haemorrhage, the availability of trained surgical teams for controlling ongoing haemorrhage is crucial for effective resuscitation. Using aortic and common iliac vascular clamps as a damage control measure also plays a very important role in controlling catastrophic maternal haemorrhage. With the growing incidence of PAS and uncontrolled bleeding in these parturients, the skilled anaesthetic and resuscitative skills of anaesthesiologists are futile if haemorrhage is not controlled. We found that the availability and use of the vascular clamps at the time of PMCD are very useful to control bleeding and help in effective resuscitation. Its use has a short learning curve and the personnel can be trained easily.","PeriodicalId":16611,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care","volume":"13 1","pages":"94 - 98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47231472","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_32_22
Avni Thacker, Divya Kheskani, D. Panchal, H. Chhanwal
Background: Labor pain and child birth entail a number of physiological consequences that may lead to deleterious effects on the mother and fetus. Implication of a neuraxial technique is being appreciated in labor. Fetal prognosis and maternal consent and its satisfaction are key to labor analgesia. Method: The primary objectives were to determine the visual analog scale (VAS), total duration of labor analgesia, patient-controlled analgesia demand, sensory and motor block, and hemodynamics. The secondary objectives were to determine obstetrics parameters such as maternal satisfaction, cervical dilation, membrane, APGAR score, and complications such as hypotension, bradycardia, and vomiting. A randomized prospective comparative, interventional study including 50 parturients was conducted, where they were divided into two equal groups of 25 each, and epidural analgesia was given by 0.2% ropivacaine with 2 mcg/ml fentanyl and 0.2% ropivacaine without fentanyl. Observation and Results: Analgesia was more in the RF group compared to the R group. The maternal satisfaction was more in the RF group than in the R group. Clinical hemodyamics, VAS score, Bromage score, and APGAR score were appreciable in the RF group as compared to the R group. Conclusion: We concluded that 0.2% ropivacine with fentanyl gives more analgesia and maternal satisfaction than ropivacine alone.
{"title":"Walking epidural in labor analgesia: A comparative study of ropivacaine with fentanyl and without fentanyl","authors":"Avni Thacker, Divya Kheskani, D. Panchal, H. Chhanwal","doi":"10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_32_22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_32_22","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Labor pain and child birth entail a number of physiological consequences that may lead to deleterious effects on the mother and fetus. Implication of a neuraxial technique is being appreciated in labor. Fetal prognosis and maternal consent and its satisfaction are key to labor analgesia. Method: The primary objectives were to determine the visual analog scale (VAS), total duration of labor analgesia, patient-controlled analgesia demand, sensory and motor block, and hemodynamics. The secondary objectives were to determine obstetrics parameters such as maternal satisfaction, cervical dilation, membrane, APGAR score, and complications such as hypotension, bradycardia, and vomiting. A randomized prospective comparative, interventional study including 50 parturients was conducted, where they were divided into two equal groups of 25 each, and epidural analgesia was given by 0.2% ropivacaine with 2 mcg/ml fentanyl and 0.2% ropivacaine without fentanyl. Observation and Results: Analgesia was more in the RF group compared to the R group. The maternal satisfaction was more in the RF group than in the R group. Clinical hemodyamics, VAS score, Bromage score, and APGAR score were appreciable in the RF group as compared to the R group. Conclusion: We concluded that 0.2% ropivacine with fentanyl gives more analgesia and maternal satisfaction than ropivacine alone.","PeriodicalId":16611,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care","volume":"13 1","pages":"45 - 50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48390453","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_3_22
N. Puthenveettil, Amal Ashok, Sobha S. Nair, J. Paul
{"title":"Anaesthetic management of parturient posted for elective caesarean section with cerebral arteriovenous malformation","authors":"N. Puthenveettil, Amal Ashok, Sobha S. Nair, J. Paul","doi":"10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_3_22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_3_22","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16611,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care","volume":"13 1","pages":"125 - 126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42058946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_49_22
N. Bhatia, K. Jain, K. Kumari, V. Ashok, A. Dhir, Mandeep Kumar
Background: Current research promotes opioid-sparing analgesia as an approach to enhanced recovery after cesarean (ERAC). In developing countries, non-opioid-based analgesia is routinely practiced in obstetric settings, as opioids are not freely accessible. There are no randomized trials evaluating intravenous diclofenac and acetaminophen for postoperative analgesia following elective cesarean section. Methods: Women scheduled for elective cesarean delivery under subarachnoid block were enrolled if they fulfilled the inclusion criteria. They were randomized to receive either intravenous diclofenac or intravenous diclofenac-acetaminophen combination at the end of surgery and at predefined time intervals during the 24-hour postoperative period. The primary outcome measure of our study was 24-hour rescue analgesic (tramadol) consumption. Secondary outcome measures included time to first request for rescue analgesia, postoperative pain at rest and on movement, episodes of nausea, retching, and vomiting during the 24-hour postoperative period and overall patient satisfaction. Results: The 24-hour rescue analgesic consumption was significantly lesser in the diclofenac-acetaminophen group compared to the diclofenac group (56.25 ± 47.73 mg vs. 92.86 ± 50.83 mg; P = 0.00). Time to first request for rescue analgesia was earlier in the diclofenac group compared to the diclofenac-acetaminophen group (3.96 ± 2.40 h vs. 5.64 ± 3.58 h, P = 0.01). Parturients given a combination of intravenous diclofenac and acetaminophen used 40% less tramadol in the first 24 hours following cesarean section and were more satisfied with their pain management when compared to those given intravenous diclofenac alone. Conclusion: Following cesarean section, intravenous diclofenac-acetaminophen combination provides superior analgesia with significantly lesser opioid consumption and higher patient satisfaction when compared to intravenous diclofenac alone. This combination is effective, easy to administer, opioid-sparing and is compatible with ERAC regimens.
背景:目前的研究促进阿片类镇痛作为一种提高剖宫产术后恢复(ERAC)的方法。在发展中国家，由于阿片类药物不能免费获得，非阿片类药物镇痛在产科环境中是常规做法。目前尚无随机试验评价选择性剖宫产术后静脉注射双氯芬酸和对乙酰氨基酚的镇痛效果。方法:在蛛网膜下腔阻滞下计划择期剖宫产的妇女如果符合纳入标准则纳入。他们在手术结束时随机接受静脉注射双氯芬酸或双氯芬酸-对乙酰氨基酚联合静脉注射，并在术后24小时内预先确定的时间间隔内接受静脉注射。本研究的主要结局指标是24小时抢救镇痛药(曲马多)用量。次要结局指标包括首次请求抢救镇痛的时间、术后休息和运动时疼痛、术后24小时内恶心、干呕和呕吐的发作以及患者总体满意度。结果:双氯芬酸-对乙酰氨基酚组24小时抢救镇痛药消耗明显低于双氯芬酸组(56.25±47.73 mg∶92.86±50.83 mg;P = 0.00)。双氯芬酸组患者首次请求抢救镇痛的时间较双氯芬酸-对乙酰氨基酚组早(3.96±2.40 h∶5.64±3.58 h, P = 0.01)。在剖宫产术后24小时内，双氯芬酸和对乙酰氨基酚联合静脉注射的产妇使用曲马多的次数减少了40%，并且与单独静脉注射双氯芬酸的产妇相比，她们对疼痛的处理更满意。结论:剖宫产术后，静脉双氯芬酸-对乙酰氨基酚联用比单用双氯芬酸镇痛效果好，阿片类药物用量少，患者满意度高。这种组合有效，易于管理，阿片类药物节约，并与ERAC方案兼容。
{"title":"Opioid-sparing post-cesarean analgesia using intravenous diclofenac-acetaminophen combination: A prospective, randomized clinical trial","authors":"N. Bhatia, K. Jain, K. Kumari, V. Ashok, A. Dhir, Mandeep Kumar","doi":"10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_49_22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_49_22","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Current research promotes opioid-sparing analgesia as an approach to enhanced recovery after cesarean (ERAC). In developing countries, non-opioid-based analgesia is routinely practiced in obstetric settings, as opioids are not freely accessible. There are no randomized trials evaluating intravenous diclofenac and acetaminophen for postoperative analgesia following elective cesarean section. Methods: Women scheduled for elective cesarean delivery under subarachnoid block were enrolled if they fulfilled the inclusion criteria. They were randomized to receive either intravenous diclofenac or intravenous diclofenac-acetaminophen combination at the end of surgery and at predefined time intervals during the 24-hour postoperative period. The primary outcome measure of our study was 24-hour rescue analgesic (tramadol) consumption. Secondary outcome measures included time to first request for rescue analgesia, postoperative pain at rest and on movement, episodes of nausea, retching, and vomiting during the 24-hour postoperative period and overall patient satisfaction. Results: The 24-hour rescue analgesic consumption was significantly lesser in the diclofenac-acetaminophen group compared to the diclofenac group (56.25 ± 47.73 mg vs. 92.86 ± 50.83 mg; P = 0.00). Time to first request for rescue analgesia was earlier in the diclofenac group compared to the diclofenac-acetaminophen group (3.96 ± 2.40 h vs. 5.64 ± 3.58 h, P = 0.01). Parturients given a combination of intravenous diclofenac and acetaminophen used 40% less tramadol in the first 24 hours following cesarean section and were more satisfied with their pain management when compared to those given intravenous diclofenac alone. Conclusion: Following cesarean section, intravenous diclofenac-acetaminophen combination provides superior analgesia with significantly lesser opioid consumption and higher patient satisfaction when compared to intravenous diclofenac alone. This combination is effective, easy to administer, opioid-sparing and is compatible with ERAC regimens.","PeriodicalId":16611,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care","volume":"13 1","pages":"65 - 70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48955611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_9_23
Manpreet Kaur, A. Trikha
{"title":"Labour analgesia-epidural/combined spinal epidural/dural puncture epidural/entonox - A cafeteria choice for the patient or just research!","authors":"Manpreet Kaur, A. Trikha","doi":"10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_9_23","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_9_23","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16611,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care","volume":"13 1","pages":"1 - 2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43701968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_31_22
M. Malinovic, Kimberly Babiash, F. Newton
Pregnancy in a patient with Marfan syndrome is associated with risks, including cardiovascular complications. The hemodynamic changes of pregnancy during delivery are deleterious to Marfan syndrome patients. This case describes a Marfan syndrome parturient with dilated aortic root >45 mm who underwent neuraxial anesthesia and cesarean delivery. Anesthetic management focused on reducing hypertension and shear forces on the ascending aorta. A combined spinal-epidural with a reduced dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine was utilized for cesarean delivery. Multidisciplinary approaches are vital in the management of Marfan syndrome pregnancy and cardiovascular complications must be considered when planning for delivery and postpartum management. Anesthetic management must consider the hemodynamic changes in pregnancy and severity of Marfan syndrome cardiovascular involvement in the parturient as well as neonatal risks. Guideline development concerning anesthetic management for both the timing of delivery and aortic repair postpartum would be beneficial to Marfan syndrome parturients.
{"title":"Combined spinal-epidural anesthetic management of delivery for marfan syndrome: Case report","authors":"M. Malinovic, Kimberly Babiash, F. Newton","doi":"10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_31_22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_31_22","url":null,"abstract":"Pregnancy in a patient with Marfan syndrome is associated with risks, including cardiovascular complications. The hemodynamic changes of pregnancy during delivery are deleterious to Marfan syndrome patients. This case describes a Marfan syndrome parturient with dilated aortic root >45 mm who underwent neuraxial anesthesia and cesarean delivery. Anesthetic management focused on reducing hypertension and shear forces on the ascending aorta. A combined spinal-epidural with a reduced dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine was utilized for cesarean delivery. Multidisciplinary approaches are vital in the management of Marfan syndrome pregnancy and cardiovascular complications must be considered when planning for delivery and postpartum management. Anesthetic management must consider the hemodynamic changes in pregnancy and severity of Marfan syndrome cardiovascular involvement in the parturient as well as neonatal risks. Guideline development concerning anesthetic management for both the timing of delivery and aortic repair postpartum would be beneficial to Marfan syndrome parturients.","PeriodicalId":16611,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care","volume":"13 1","pages":"106 - 108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43812323","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：