首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery最新文献

英文 中文
Distinguishing Postoperative Pain Development Trajectory After Orthognathic Surgery 鉴别正颌手术后疼痛发展轨迹。
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2025.09.010
Li-Kuan Wang MD , Xu-Dong Yang MD, PHD , Hai-Yin Wu MD, PHD , Dan Zhou MD

Background

The lack of understanding of postoperative pain patterns makes it challenging to adopt refined pain management for orthognathic patients.

Purpose

The purpose was to characterize pain trajectories for the first 5 days following orthognathic surgery and identify factors associated with the trajectories.

Study design, setting, and sample

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at Peking University Hospital of Stomatology and included individuals aged ≥18 years who underwent orthognathic surgery. Patients with neuropsychiatric disorders or missing postoperative pain data were excluded.

Predictor variables

The predictor variable was postoperative pain intensity, assessed daily from days 1 to 5 after surgery using numerical rating scale.

Main outcome variables

The outcome variable was pain trajectory, determined by group modeling of self-reported pain over the first 5 postoperative days.

Covariates

Covariates comprised demographic, psychological, surgical, and perioperative variables.

Analyses

Descriptive statistics were calculated for each variable. Group-based modeling determined and clustered pain trajectories, and logistic regression identified independent factors. A P value of < .05 was considered significant.

Results

The sample was composed of 371 subjects with a median age of 25 years [21 to 29] and 272 (73.3%) were female. We identified three pain trajectories, and there were 208 (56.1%), 111 (29.9%), 52 (14%) subjects in Trajectories 1, 2, and 3 groups, respectively. Trajectory 1 showed gradually decreasing pain. Trajectory 2 showed mild pain that decreased until day 3 and then increased slightly on days 4 to 5. Trajectory 3 showed moderate pain decreasing until day 3, increasing to moderate on day 4 and severe on day 5. Increased Pain Catastrophizing Scale score (adjusted odds ratio (OR), 1.033, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.006 to 1.060, P = .015), American Society of Anesthesiologists classification I (adjusted OR, 2.593, 95% CI, 1.102 to 6.100, P = .029), increased remifentanil dose (adjusted OR, 1.301, 95% CI, 1.038 to 1.632, P = .023), and dezocine used in the analgesia pump (adjusted OR, 4.883, 95% CI, 1.953 to 12.209, P = .001) were associated with increased likelihood of Trajectory 3. Male had significantly lower risk of Trajectory 2 (adjusted OR, 0.424, 95% CI, 0.264 to 0.680, P < .001) and Trajectory 3 (adjusted OR, 0.489, 95% CI, 0.287 to 0.834, P = .009).

Conclusion

Distinct pain trajectories were exhibited after orthognathic surgery. It recommends patient-specific management across different trajectories.
背景:缺乏对术后疼痛模式的了解使得对正颌患者采用精细的疼痛管理具有挑战性。目的:目的是描述正颌手术后前5天的疼痛轨迹,并确定与疼痛轨迹相关的因素。研究设计、环境和样本:本回顾性队列研究在北京大学口腔医院进行,纳入年龄≥18岁且接受正颌手术的患者。排除有神经精神障碍或术后疼痛数据缺失的患者。预测变量:预测变量为术后疼痛强度,从术后第1天到第5天每天使用数值评定量表进行评估。主要结局变量:结局变量为疼痛轨迹,通过术后前5天自我报告疼痛的组建模确定。协变量:协变量包括人口统计学、心理学、外科和围手术期变量。分析:对各变量进行描述性统计。基于组的建模确定和聚集疼痛轨迹,逻辑回归确定独立因素。P值< 0.05被认为是显著的。结果:样本共371例,年龄中位数为25岁[21 ~ 29岁],其中女性272例,占73.3%。我们确定了三种疼痛轨迹,分别有208人(56.1%)、111人(29.9%)、52人(14%)被分为轨迹1、2和3组。轨迹1显示疼痛逐渐减轻。轨迹2显示轻度疼痛,直到第3天减轻,然后在第4至5天略有增加。轨迹3显示中度疼痛缓解至第3天,第4天加重至中度,第5天加重。剧烈疼痛量表分数增加(调整后的优势比(或)1.033,95%可信区间(CI), 1.006 - 1.060, P = .015),美国麻醉医师学会分类我(调整或者2.593,95%可信区间,1.102 - 6.100,P = .029),增加remifentanil剂量(调整或者1.301,95%可信区间,1.038 - 1.632,P = 0),和地佐辛用于镇痛泵(或调整,4.883,95% CI, 1.953 - 12.209, P =措施)是与轨迹3的可能性增加。男性患轨迹2(校正OR, 0.424, 95% CI, 0.264 ~ 0.680, P < 0.001)和轨迹3(校正OR, 0.489, 95% CI, 0.287 ~ 0.834, P = 0.009)的风险显著降低。结论:正颌手术后有明显的疼痛轨迹。它建议对不同的患者进行针对性的管理。
{"title":"Distinguishing Postoperative Pain Development Trajectory After Orthognathic Surgery","authors":"Li-Kuan Wang MD ,&nbsp;Xu-Dong Yang MD, PHD ,&nbsp;Hai-Yin Wu MD, PHD ,&nbsp;Dan Zhou MD","doi":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.09.010","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.09.010","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The lack of understanding of postoperative pain patterns makes it challenging to adopt refined pain management for orthognathic patients.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose was to characterize pain trajectories for the first 5 days following orthognathic surgery and identify factors associated with the trajectories.</div></div><div><h3>Study design, setting, and sample</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study was conducted at Peking University Hospital of Stomatology and included individuals aged ≥18 years who underwent orthognathic surgery. Patients with neuropsychiatric disorders or missing postoperative pain data were excluded.</div></div><div><h3>Predictor variables</h3><div>The predictor variable was postoperative pain intensity, assessed daily from days 1 to 5 after surgery using numerical rating scale.</div></div><div><h3>Main outcome variables</h3><div>The outcome variable was pain trajectory, determined by group modeling of self-reported pain over the first 5 postoperative days.</div></div><div><h3>Covariates</h3><div>Covariates comprised demographic, psychological, surgical, and perioperative variables.</div></div><div><h3>Analyses</h3><div>Descriptive statistics were calculated for each variable. Group-based modeling determined and clustered pain trajectories, and logistic regression identified independent factors. A <em>P</em> value of &lt; .05 was considered significant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The sample was composed of 371 subjects with a median age of 25 years [21 to 29] and 272 (73.3%) were female. We identified three pain trajectories, and there were 208 (56.1%), 111 (29.9%), 52 (14%) subjects in Trajectories 1, 2, and 3 groups, respectively. Trajectory 1 showed gradually decreasing pain. Trajectory 2 showed mild pain that decreased until day 3 and then increased slightly on days 4 to 5. Trajectory 3 showed moderate pain decreasing until day 3, increasing to moderate on day 4 and severe on day 5. Increased Pain Catastrophizing Scale score (adjusted odds ratio (OR), 1.033, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.006 to 1.060, <em>P</em> = .015), American Society of Anesthesiologists classification I (adjusted OR, 2.593, 95% CI, 1.102 to 6.100, <em>P</em> = .029), increased remifentanil dose (adjusted OR, 1.301, 95% CI, 1.038 to 1.632, <em>P</em> = .023), and dezocine used in the analgesia pump (adjusted OR, 4.883, 95% CI, 1.953 to 12.209, <em>P</em> = .001) were associated with increased likelihood of Trajectory 3. Male had significantly lower risk of Trajectory 2 (adjusted OR, 0.424, 95% CI, 0.264 to 0.680, <em>P</em> &lt; .001) and Trajectory 3 (adjusted OR, 0.489, 95% CI, 0.287 to 0.834, <em>P</em> = .009).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Distinct pain trajectories were exhibited after orthognathic surgery. It recommends patient-specific management across different trajectories.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"84 1","pages":"Pages 45-59"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145228497","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is Same Day Discharge Associated With Readmission After Orthognathic Surgery? 正颌手术后同日出院是否与再入院有关?
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2025.09.017
Tim T. Wang DMD, MD, MPH , Lang Liang BS , Nicholas Wilken DDS, MD , Gary Warburton DDS, MD , John Caccamese DMD, MD , Cameron Lee DMD, MD

Background

Same day discharge pathways have the potential to reduce health care expenditures and improve access to care for patients undergoing orthognathic surgery. However, the effect of same day discharge on safety and postoperative outcomes is poorly understood.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to measure the association between discharge pathway and 30-day hospital readmission, as well as evaluate trends in same day discharge over time in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery.

Study design, setting sample

This was a retrospective cohort study using the 2011 to 2023 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program databases. Patients undergoing orthognathic surgery were included. Patients with missing data or undergoing concurrent temporomandibular joint or facial cosmetic procedures were excluded.

Predictor variable

The predictor was discharge pathway, categorized as either same day discharge from the hospital or inpatient admission.

Main outcome variable

The primary outcome was hospital readmission within 30 days of surgery.

Covariates

Covariates were categorized into demographic (age, sex), medical (hypertension, diabetes), and perioperative (type of surgery, operative time).

Analyses

Descriptive and bivariate statistics were performed to evaluate the association between discharge pathway and readmission. Linear regression was utilized to analyze trends in discharge pathway over time.

Results

The cohort was composed of 2,056 subjects with a mean age of 28.8 ± 10.8 years, and 1,035 were male (50.3%). Of these, 468 (22.8%) were discharged the same day and 1,588 (77.2%) were admitted. Readmission rates were 0.40% (n = 2) for same day discharge and 1.10% (n = 17) for inpatient admission (relative risk 0.4, 95% CI 0.09 to 1.72, P = .3). In bivariate analysis, no study covariates including discharge pathway were associated with readmission. The mean time between discharge and readmission for the same day discharge and inpatient admission groups were 7.5 ± 6.4 days and 12.2 ± 9.0 days, respectively (P = .4). The frequency of same day discharge increased during the study period from 10.7% in 2011 to 23.1% in 2023 (P = .03).

Conclusions and relevance

Same day discharge was not associated with an increased risk of 30-day readmission in appropriately selected patients.
背景:当天出院路径有可能减少医疗保健支出,并改善接受正颌手术的患者获得护理的机会。然而,当天出院对安全性和术后结果的影响尚不清楚。目的:本研究的目的是测量出院途径与30天住院再入院之间的关系,并评估接受正颌手术的患者当天出院的趋势。研究设计,设置样本:这是一项回顾性队列研究,使用2011年至2023年美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划数据库。包括接受正颌手术的患者。数据缺失或同时进行颞下颌关节或面部美容手术的患者被排除在外。预测变量:预测因子为出院途径,分类为当日出院或住院。主要结局变量:主要结局是手术后30天内再入院。协变量:协变量分为人口学(年龄、性别)、医学(高血压、糖尿病)和围手术期(手术类型、手术时间)。分析:采用描述性和双变量统计来评估出院途径与再入院之间的关系。利用线性回归分析了排放路径随时间的变化趋势。结果:该队列由2056名受试者组成,平均年龄28.8±10.8岁,其中男性1035名(50.3%)。其中当日出院468例(22.8%),入院1588例(77.2%)。当日出院患者再入院率为0.40% (n = 2),住院患者再入院率为1.10% (n = 17)(相对危险度0.4,95% CI 0.09 ~ 1.72, P = 0.3)。在双变量分析中,没有包括出院途径在内的研究协变量与再入院相关。当日出院组和住院组出院至再入院的平均时间分别为7.5±6.4天和12.2±9.0天(P = 0.4)。同日出院频率从2011年的10.7%上升到2023年的23.1% (P = 0.03)。结论和相关性:在适当选择的患者中,同一天出院与30天再入院风险增加无关。
{"title":"Is Same Day Discharge Associated With Readmission After Orthognathic Surgery?","authors":"Tim T. Wang DMD, MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Lang Liang BS ,&nbsp;Nicholas Wilken DDS, MD ,&nbsp;Gary Warburton DDS, MD ,&nbsp;John Caccamese DMD, MD ,&nbsp;Cameron Lee DMD, MD","doi":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.09.017","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.09.017","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Same day discharge pathways have the potential to reduce health care expenditures and improve access to care for patients undergoing orthognathic surgery. However, the effect of same day discharge on safety and postoperative outcomes is poorly understood.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to measure the association between discharge pathway and 30-day hospital readmission, as well as evaluate trends in same day discharge over time in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Study design, setting sample</h3><div>This was a retrospective cohort study using the 2011 to 2023 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program databases. Patients undergoing orthognathic surgery were included. Patients with missing data or undergoing concurrent temporomandibular joint or facial cosmetic procedures were excluded.</div></div><div><h3>Predictor variable</h3><div>The predictor was discharge pathway, categorized as either same day discharge from the hospital or inpatient admission.</div></div><div><h3>Main outcome variable</h3><div>The primary outcome was hospital readmission within 30 days of surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Covariates</h3><div>Covariates were categorized into demographic (age, sex), medical (hypertension, diabetes), and perioperative (type of surgery, operative time).</div></div><div><h3>Analyses</h3><div>Descriptive and bivariate statistics were performed to evaluate the association between discharge pathway and readmission. Linear regression was utilized to analyze trends in discharge pathway over time.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The cohort was composed of 2,056 subjects with a mean age of 28.8 ± 10.8 years, and 1,035 were male (50.3%). Of these, 468 (22.8%) were discharged the same day and 1,588 (77.2%) were admitted. Readmission rates were 0.40% (n = 2) for same day discharge and 1.10% (n = 17) for inpatient admission (relative risk 0.4, 95% CI 0.09 to 1.72, <em>P</em> = .3). In bivariate analysis, no study covariates including discharge pathway were associated with readmission. The mean time between discharge and readmission for the same day discharge and inpatient admission groups were 7.5 ± 6.4 days and 12.2 ± 9.0 days, respectively (<em>P</em> = .4). The frequency of same day discharge increased during the study period from 10.7% in 2011 to 23.1% in 2023 (<em>P</em> = .03).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and relevance</h3><div>Same day discharge was not associated with an increased risk of 30-day readmission in appropriately selected patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"84 1","pages":"Pages 60-67"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145345577","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Contemplating One’s Novel 沉思小说
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2025.09.004
Thomas B. Dodson DMD, MPH (Editor-in-Chief)
{"title":"Contemplating One’s Novel","authors":"Thomas B. Dodson DMD, MPH (Editor-in-Chief)","doi":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.09.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.09.004","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"84 1","pages":"Pages 1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145860745","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Large Language Models in Addressing Patient Queries Regarding Maxillomandibular Fixation for Maxillofacial Fractures 评估大型语言模型在解决颌面部骨折患者上颌下颌固定问题中的有效性。
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2025.09.016
Ragavi Alagarsamy MDS , Babu Lal MDS , Jitendra Chawla MDS , Ramya Arangaraju MDS , Sujata Mohanty MDS , Kaleem Fatima MDS , Arivarasan Barathi MD
<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients with maxillofacial fractures increasingly seek information from large language models (LLMs), yet the accuracy and readability of these responses remain uncertain.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study evaluated the performance of 5 publicly accessible LLMs in answering frequently asked questions (FAQs) about maxillomandibular fixation (MMF).</div></div><div><h3>Study Design, Setting, and Sample</h3><div>This in-silico cross-sectional study, conducted in January 2025, evaluated 47 FAQs and yielded 235 responses from 5 open-access LLMs, excluding subscription-based models.</div></div><div><h3>Predictor Variable</h3><div>The predictor variable was LLM architecture: decoder-only transformer models (DOT-1, DOT-2), a multimodal transformer model (MTM), a productivity-focused model (PM), and a constitutional artificial intelligence (AI)-based model (CAM).</div></div><div><h3>Outcome Variables</h3><div>The primary outcome was LLM performance, measured with the QUEST (Quality of information, Understanding and reasoning, Expression style and persona, Safety and harm, and Trust and confidence) framework. Domains assessed were accuracy (Likert ≥4), hallucination (presence/absence of fabricated content), usefulness, clarity, trust, and satisfaction (Likert 1 to 5), and readability (Flesch–Kincaid Reading Ease [FKRE] and Grade Level [FKGL]). Responses were rated independently by 7 evaluators (5 oral and maxillofacial surgeons and 2 residents) in a blinded manner.</div></div><div><h3>Covariates</h3><div>None.</div></div><div><h3>Analyses</h3><div>Ordinal outcomes were analyzed with the Friedman test and pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Readability was compared with one-way ANOVA. Inter-rater reliability was measured with Fleiss' kappa. Statistical significance was set at <em>P</em> < .05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The sample included 235 LLM-generated responses. DOT-1 showed the highest accuracy (88.5 ± 6.2%), which was statistically significantly greater than DOT-2 (79.6 ± 10.1%) and PM (81.2 ± 9.3%) (<em>P</em> = .004). It also had a statistically significantly lower hallucination rate (5.2%) compared with DOT-2 (10.1%) and PM (9.4%) (<em>P</em> = .013). CAM performed comparably in accuracy (86.3 ± 7.1%); however, its readability was statistically significantly poorer (Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level = 22.7 ± 12.9; <em>P</em> < .001). Multimodal transformer model showed intermediate performance. Inter-rater agreement was almost perfect for accuracy (κ = 0.79 to 1.00) and hallucination (κ = 0.91 to 1.00) and moderate to substantial for ordinal variables.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion and Relevance</h3><div>LLMs can provide accurate responses to maxillomandibular fixation queries, but readability remains limited and model-dependent. These findings underscore the need for developing more patient-friendly artificial intelligence (AI) outputs and highlight the importance of clinician oversight in gu
背景:颌面部骨折患者越来越多地从大型语言模型(LLMs)中寻求信息,但这些反应的准确性和可读性仍然不确定。目的:本研究评估了5位可公开访问的llm在回答关于上颌骨下颌固定(MMF)的常见问题(FAQs)方面的表现。研究设计、设置和样本:这项于2025年1月进行的计算机横断面研究评估了47个常见问题,并获得了来自5个开放获取法学硕士的235个回复,不包括基于订阅的模型。预测变量:预测变量是LLM架构:只有解码器的变压器模型(DOT-1, DOT-2),多模态变压器模型(MTM),以生产力为中心的模型(PM),以及基于宪法人工智能(AI)的模型(CAM)。结果变量:主要结果是LLM的表现,用QUEST(信息质量,理解和推理,表达风格和角色,安全和伤害,信任和信心)框架来衡量。评估的领域包括准确性(Likert≥4)、幻觉(存在/不存在虚构内容)、有用性、清晰度、信任和满意度(Likert 1至5)和可读性(flesche - kincaid Reading Ease [FKRE]和Grade Level [FKGL])。7名评估者(5名口腔颌面外科医生和2名住院医师)采用盲法对问卷进行独立评分。共:没有。分析:用Friedman检验和两两Wilcoxon符号秩检验对顺序结果进行分析。采用单因素方差分析比较可读性。量表间信度采用Fleiss kappa法测定。差异有统计学意义,P < 0.05。结果:样本包括235个llm生成的响应。DOT-1的准确率最高(88.5±6.2%),显著高于DOT-2(79.6±10.1%)和PM(81.2±9.3%)(P = 0.004)。与DOT-2(10.1%)和PM(9.4%)相比,其幻觉率(5.2%)也有统计学意义上的显著降低(P = 0.013)。CAM的准确度与CAM相当(86.3±7.1%);但其可读性较差(Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level = 22.7±12.9;P < .001)。多模态变压器模型表现为中等性能。在准确性(κ = 0.79至1.00)和幻觉(κ = 0.91至1.00)方面,评分者之间的一致性几乎是完美的,而在有序变量方面,评分者之间的一致性从中等到显著。结论及相关性:llm可以提供准确的上颌下颌固定查询,但可读性仍然有限且依赖于模型。这些发现强调了开发对患者更友好的人工智能(AI)输出的必要性,并强调了临床医生监督指导患者使用llm的重要性。
{"title":"Evaluating the Effectiveness of Large Language Models in Addressing Patient Queries Regarding Maxillomandibular Fixation for Maxillofacial Fractures","authors":"Ragavi Alagarsamy MDS ,&nbsp;Babu Lal MDS ,&nbsp;Jitendra Chawla MDS ,&nbsp;Ramya Arangaraju MDS ,&nbsp;Sujata Mohanty MDS ,&nbsp;Kaleem Fatima MDS ,&nbsp;Arivarasan Barathi MD","doi":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.09.016","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.09.016","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Background&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Patients with maxillofacial fractures increasingly seek information from large language models (LLMs), yet the accuracy and readability of these responses remain uncertain.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Purpose&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;This study evaluated the performance of 5 publicly accessible LLMs in answering frequently asked questions (FAQs) about maxillomandibular fixation (MMF).&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Study Design, Setting, and Sample&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;This in-silico cross-sectional study, conducted in January 2025, evaluated 47 FAQs and yielded 235 responses from 5 open-access LLMs, excluding subscription-based models.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Predictor Variable&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;The predictor variable was LLM architecture: decoder-only transformer models (DOT-1, DOT-2), a multimodal transformer model (MTM), a productivity-focused model (PM), and a constitutional artificial intelligence (AI)-based model (CAM).&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Outcome Variables&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;The primary outcome was LLM performance, measured with the QUEST (Quality of information, Understanding and reasoning, Expression style and persona, Safety and harm, and Trust and confidence) framework. Domains assessed were accuracy (Likert ≥4), hallucination (presence/absence of fabricated content), usefulness, clarity, trust, and satisfaction (Likert 1 to 5), and readability (Flesch–Kincaid Reading Ease [FKRE] and Grade Level [FKGL]). Responses were rated independently by 7 evaluators (5 oral and maxillofacial surgeons and 2 residents) in a blinded manner.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Covariates&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;None.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Analyses&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Ordinal outcomes were analyzed with the Friedman test and pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Readability was compared with one-way ANOVA. Inter-rater reliability was measured with Fleiss' kappa. Statistical significance was set at &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; &lt; .05.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;The sample included 235 LLM-generated responses. DOT-1 showed the highest accuracy (88.5 ± 6.2%), which was statistically significantly greater than DOT-2 (79.6 ± 10.1%) and PM (81.2 ± 9.3%) (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; = .004). It also had a statistically significantly lower hallucination rate (5.2%) compared with DOT-2 (10.1%) and PM (9.4%) (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; = .013). CAM performed comparably in accuracy (86.3 ± 7.1%); however, its readability was statistically significantly poorer (Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level = 22.7 ± 12.9; &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; &lt; .001). Multimodal transformer model showed intermediate performance. Inter-rater agreement was almost perfect for accuracy (κ = 0.79 to 1.00) and hallucination (κ = 0.91 to 1.00) and moderate to substantial for ordinal variables.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Conclusion and Relevance&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;LLMs can provide accurate responses to maxillomandibular fixation queries, but readability remains limited and model-dependent. These findings underscore the need for developing more patient-friendly artificial intelligence (AI) outputs and highlight the importance of clinician oversight in gu","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"84 1","pages":"Pages 68-79"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145370339","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
RE: Does Combining Arthrocentesis With Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin Outperform Arthrocentesis or Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin Alone in Alleviating Pain and Improving Function in Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction? RE:关节穿刺联合注射富血小板纤维蛋白在缓解颞下颌关节功能障碍的疼痛和改善功能方面是否优于关节穿刺或单独注射富血小板纤维蛋白?
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2025.07.014
Hemad Iraji Khosrowshahi DDS, Nima Masoudi MD
{"title":"RE: Does Combining Arthrocentesis With Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin Outperform Arthrocentesis or Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin Alone in Alleviating Pain and Improving Function in Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction?","authors":"Hemad Iraji Khosrowshahi DDS,&nbsp;Nima Masoudi MD","doi":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.07.014","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.07.014","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"84 1","pages":"Page 11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145860744","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial Board Page 编委会页面
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/S0278-2391(25)00884-5
{"title":"Editorial Board Page","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S0278-2391(25)00884-5","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S0278-2391(25)00884-5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"84 1","pages":"Page A2"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145860221","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Artificial Intelligence in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Transforming Practice, Precision, and Patient Care 口腔颌面外科中的人工智能:改变实践、精度和患者护理
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2025.07.012
Idean Roohani MD , Bonnie L. Padwa MD, DMD , Jeffrey A. Hammoudeh MD, DDS
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Transforming Practice, Precision, and Patient Care","authors":"Idean Roohani MD ,&nbsp;Bonnie L. Padwa MD, DMD ,&nbsp;Jeffrey A. Hammoudeh MD, DDS","doi":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.07.012","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.07.012","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"84 1","pages":"Pages 3-5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145860740","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Persistent Neurosensory Disturbance Following Sagittal Split Osteotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of One-Year Outcomes and Risk Factors 矢状面劈开截骨术后持续性神经感觉障碍:1年预后和危险因素的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2025.08.014
Andrew E. Bertagna DMD, MD , Frederic Van der Cruyssen MD, DDS, MHM, PhD , Michael Miloro DMD, MD

Background

Sagittal split osteotomy (SSO) is widely performed for mandibular repositioning; however, inferior alveolar nerve injury may result in persistent neurosensory disturbance (NSD) that affects quality of life. The true 1-year incidence and associated risk factors remain uncertain.

Purpose

The study purpose was to estimate the 1-year incidence of persistent NSD after SSO and to evaluate risk factors.

Data Sources

We systematically searched PubMed and Embase (1998 to February 2025). Eligible human studies (randomized, prospective, retrospective) reporting NSD outcomes after SSO and possible risk factors in English language were included.

Study Selection

Randomized controlled trials and prospective and retrospective cohort studies with a minimum follow-up of 3 months, reporting NSD incidence and potential predictors, were included. Nonhuman studies, case reports, and studies with alternative osteotomy techniques or incomplete NSD assessment were excluded. Study selection was performed by 2 independent reviewers.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Following PRISMA, we extracted study characteristics, variable definitions, NSD assessment methods, and 1-year outcomes. “Persistent NSD” was defined as any NSD reported or assessed at 12 months postoperatively. Random- and fixed-effects models estimated pooled 1-year incidence; heterogeneity (I2) and small-study effects were assessed.

Results

The final sample comprised 47 studies (5,406 patients). The pooled 1-year incidence of persistent NSD was 21% (95% CI, 13%-32%). Older age (statistically significant in 5 out of 9 studies), greater mandibular advancement (significant in 2 out of 2 studies), and intraoperative nerve exposure/manipulation (significant in 2 out of 3 studies) were statistically significantly associated with a higher risk of persistent NSD across contributing adequately powered studies. Across the available evidence, persistent NSD was not significantly associated with sex (8/9 studies), skeletal class (4/5), fixation method (1/2), third molar presence (1/1), or concomitant genioplasty (3/5).

Conclusions and Relevance

NSD following SSO persists in 1 in 5 patients at 1 year. Larger mandibular advancements and nerve manipulation increase persistent NSD risk. Standardized NSD assessments and adequately powered studies are essential to refine risk stratification and optimize surgical techniques.
背景:矢状面劈开截骨术(SSO)被广泛应用于下颌复位;然而,下肺泡神经损伤可导致持续性神经感觉障碍(NSD),影响生活质量。真实的1年发病率和相关危险因素仍不确定。目的:研究目的是估计单点登录后1年持续NSD的发生率,并评估危险因素。数据来源:我们系统地检索了PubMed和Embase(1998 - 2025年2月)。纳入了符合条件的人类研究(随机、前瞻性、回顾性),报告了单点登录后的NSD结果和英语语言中可能的危险因素。研究选择:纳入随机对照试验、前瞻性和回顾性队列研究,至少随访3个月,报告NSD发病率和潜在预测因素。非人类研究、病例报告、替代截骨技术或不完整NSD评估的研究被排除在外。研究选择由2名独立审稿人进行。数据提取和综合:根据PRISMA,我们提取了研究特征、变量定义、NSD评估方法和1年结果。“持续性NSD”定义为术后12个月报告或评估的任何NSD。随机效应和固定效应模型估计了汇总的1年发病率;评估异质性(I2)和小研究效应。结果:最终样本包括47项研究(5406例患者)。1年持续NSD的总发生率为21% (95% CI, 13%-32%)。年龄较大(9项研究中有5项具有统计学意义)、下颌前移较大(2项研究中有2项具有统计学意义)和术中神经暴露/操作(3项研究中有2项具有统计学意义)与持续性NSD的高风险具有统计学意义。在现有的证据中,持续性NSD与性别(8/9)、骨骼类别(4/5)、固定方法(1/2)、第三磨牙存在(1/1)或伴随的生殖器成形术(3/5)无关。结论和相关性:1 / 5的患者在1年内仍存在SSO后的NSD。较大的下颌骨进展和神经操作增加了持续性NSD的风险。标准化的NSD评估和充分有力的研究对于完善风险分层和优化手术技术至关重要。
{"title":"Persistent Neurosensory Disturbance Following Sagittal Split Osteotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of One-Year Outcomes and Risk Factors","authors":"Andrew E. Bertagna DMD, MD ,&nbsp;Frederic Van der Cruyssen MD, DDS, MHM, PhD ,&nbsp;Michael Miloro DMD, MD","doi":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.08.014","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.08.014","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Sagittal split osteotomy (SSO) is widely performed for mandibular repositioning; however, inferior alveolar nerve injury may result in persistent neurosensory disturbance (NSD) that affects quality of life. The true 1-year incidence and associated risk factors remain uncertain.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The study purpose was to estimate the 1-year incidence of persistent NSD after SSO and to evaluate risk factors.</div></div><div><h3>Data Sources</h3><div>We systematically searched PubMed and Embase (1998 to February 2025). Eligible human studies (randomized, prospective, retrospective) reporting NSD outcomes after SSO and possible risk factors in English language were included.</div></div><div><h3>Study Selection</h3><div>Randomized controlled trials and prospective and retrospective cohort studies with a minimum follow-up of 3 months, reporting NSD incidence and potential predictors, were included. Nonhuman studies, case reports, and studies with alternative osteotomy techniques or incomplete NSD assessment were excluded. Study selection was performed by 2 independent reviewers.</div></div><div><h3>Data Extraction and Synthesis</h3><div>Following PRISMA, we extracted study characteristics, variable definitions, NSD assessment methods, and 1-year outcomes. “Persistent NSD” was defined as any NSD reported or assessed at 12 months postoperatively. Random- and fixed-effects models estimated pooled 1-year incidence; heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup>) and small-study effects were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The final sample comprised 47 studies (5,406 patients). The pooled 1-year incidence of persistent NSD was 21% (95% CI, 13%-32%). Older age (statistically significant in 5 out of 9 studies), greater mandibular advancement (significant in 2 out of 2 studies), and intraoperative nerve exposure/manipulation (significant in 2 out of 3 studies) were statistically significantly associated with a higher risk of persistent NSD across contributing adequately powered studies. Across the available evidence, persistent NSD was not significantly associated with sex (8/9 studies), skeletal class (4/5), fixation method (1/2), third molar presence (1/1), or concomitant genioplasty (3/5).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Relevance</h3><div>NSD following SSO persists in 1 in 5 patients at 1 year. Larger mandibular advancements and nerve manipulation increase persistent NSD risk. Standardized NSD assessments and adequately powered studies are essential to refine risk stratification and optimize surgical techniques.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"84 1","pages":"Pages 25-44"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145124968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The 2025 ADA Dental Anesthesia Provider Summit: Patient Safety and Access to Care 2025年美国牙科麻醉供应商峰会:患者安全和获得护理。
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2025.09.020
J. David Johnson Jr. DDS , Paul J. Schwartz DMD , Andrew Herlich DMD, MD
{"title":"The 2025 ADA Dental Anesthesia Provider Summit: Patient Safety and Access to Care","authors":"J. David Johnson Jr. DDS ,&nbsp;Paul J. Schwartz DMD ,&nbsp;Andrew Herlich DMD, MD","doi":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.09.020","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.09.020","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"84 1","pages":"Pages 138-140"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145274872","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
RE: Aromatherapy on Anxiety, Pain, and Quality of Life Following Surgery of Mandibular Third Molars: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial 芳香疗法对下颌第三磨牙术后焦虑、疼痛和生活质量的影响:一项随机、双盲临床试验
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2025.07.017
Deepak Bangera MD (Naturopathy), Deenadayalan Boopalan MD (Naturopathy), N.V. Gnana Deep Tatavarti MD (Naturopathy), Raghavendra Rao Mohan PhD (Yoga and Life Sciences)
{"title":"RE: Aromatherapy on Anxiety, Pain, and Quality of Life Following Surgery of Mandibular Third Molars: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial","authors":"Deepak Bangera MD (Naturopathy),&nbsp;Deenadayalan Boopalan MD (Naturopathy),&nbsp;N.V. Gnana Deep Tatavarti MD (Naturopathy),&nbsp;Raghavendra Rao Mohan PhD (Yoga and Life Sciences)","doi":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.07.017","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.07.017","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"84 1","pages":"Page 12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145860743","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1