Journal of Pharmacy Technology最新文献

Background: Transition of care (TOC) refers to the movement of patients between different health care settings due to changes in medical conditions and needs. Pharmacists can play an important role in TOC services as polypharmacy is a common reason for hospital readmission that costs the US taxpayers an average of $17 billion annually. Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of TOC telehealth services provided by pharmacy students at a university-based call center on 30-day hospital readmission. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, an electronic chart review was conducted for patients who were discharged from the hospital and received a telephone call from pharmacy students. Patients were referred to the pharmacy team from a primary care provider office. The co-primary endpoints were the number of 30-day all-cause hospital readmissions (including emergency department visits) and 30-day readmission due to initial admission diagnosis in patients who received a telephonic TOC call from a pharmacy student compared with patients who declined or were unable to be reached. Types of pharmacy-related TOC interventions provided by students were also collected. Results: A total of 84 patients were included in this study. All-cause 30-day readmission was similar between groups (13% vs 15.8%), whereas 30-day readmission due to initial admission diagnosis was much lower in the intervention group (5.9% vs 11.1%). Although a positive trend was observed in favor of the intervention group, a statistically significant difference was not observed for both 30-day all-cause readmission and 30-day readmission due to initial admission diagnosis. Medication reconciliation, adherence counseling, and lifestyle education (diet, exercise) are the most common topics discussed with the patients during TOC interventions. Conclusion: Using student pharmacists to provide postdischarge TOC calls can be a benefit to the patient and the health care team while offering pharmacy students valuable learning experience prior to graduation.

Objective: Acute encephalopathy is a common symptom encountered in critically ill patients and may be associated with Wernicke's encephalopathy (WE) or serotonin syndrome (SS). We describe a patient who presented with clinical manifestations of both WE and SS and who responded to treatment for both pathologies. Case: A 56-year-old male presented after being found unresponsive and in a questionable tonic-clonic state. Past medical history was significant for depression managed with fluoxetine 20 mg by mouth daily and alcohol use disorder. A physical exam revealed severe clonus in the bilateral lower extremities; diffuse hyperreflexia along with akinesia on the left upper extremity; ophthalmoplegia; and persistent tachycardia despite pharmacologic interventions. It was learned that the patient had been taking his fluoxetine 3 times per day rather than daily as prescribed. Oral cyproheptadine was administered at a 12 mg initial dose followed by 4 mg every 6 hours. A thiamine regimen of 500 mg intravenous (IV) every 8 hours in addition to folic acid 1 mg IV every 24 hours was initiated to treat WE. Physical symptoms of both WE and SS resolved within 48 hours, and the patient was ultimately discharged to home in stable condition. Discussion/Conclusions: The clinical diagnosis of both WE and SS in this case is supported by the Caine and Hunter criteria, respectively, as well as the resolution of symptoms with accepted treatment modalities for each. It is important for clinicians to be cognizant of potential overlapping pathologies when patients present with nonspecific symptoms, especially acute encephalopathy, in the intensive care unit.

Background: Neuromuscular blocking agents are one of the few medication classes that have demonstrated a clinical benefit in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, most literature utilized cisatracurium, and utilization of atracurium is limited to 1 small study. Objective: The purpose of this study was to provide further evidence comparing the safety and efficacy of atracurium versus cisatracurium for the treatment of ARDS. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort noninferiority study was conducted at 3 hospitals within a tertiary health care system. We included subjects diagnosed with ARDS who received either atracurium or cisatracurium for at least 12 hours. The primary outcome measured the change in PaO₂/FiO₂ (P/F) ratio from baseline to 48 hours after initiation. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups except for a higher median age and a higher proportion of subjects who were COVID-positive in the atracurium group. There were also some noted differences in the baseline P/F ratios. In a multivariable model adjusting for baseline characteristics, the change in the P/F ratio for atracurium was noninferior to cisatracurium at 24, 48, and 72 hours. A significant cost reduction, measured as cost per patient per day, was seen with the use of atracurium ($14.81-$25.16 vs $33.86-$41.91). Conclusion: Atracurium appears to be a safe and cheaper alternative agent in the management of ARDS.