Journal of Pharmacy Technology最新文献

Background: Anxiety is a condition for which current treatments are often limited by adverse events (AEs). Components of medicinal cannabis, cannabidiol (CBD) and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), have been proposed as potential treatments for anxiety disorders, specifically posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Objective: To evaluate quality-of-life outcomes after treatment with various cannabis formulations to determine the effectiveness and associated AEs. Methods: An interim analysis of data collected between September 2018 and June 2021 from the CA Clinics Observational Study. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 survey scores of 198 participants with an anxiety disorder were compared at baseline and after treatment with medicinal cannabis. The data of 568 anxiety participants were also analyzed to examine the AEs they experienced by the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities organ system class. Results: The median doses taken were 50.0 mg/day for CBD and 4.4 mg/day for THC. The total participant sample reported significantly improved anxiety, depression, fatigue, and ability to take part in social roles and activities. Those who were diagnosed with PTSD (n = 57) reported significantly improved anxiety, depression, fatigue, and social abilities. The most common AEs reported across the whole participant cohort were dry mouth (32.6%), somnolence (31.3%), and fatigue (18.5%), but incidence varied with different cannabis formulations. The inclusion of THC in a formulation was significantly associated with experiencing gastrointestinal AEs; specifically dry mouth and nausea. Conclusions: Formulations of cannabis significantly improved anxiety, depression, fatigue, and the ability to participate in social activities in participants with anxiety disorders. The AEs experienced by participants are consistent with those in other studies.

Background: Two methods of area under the curve (AUC) dosing are recommended in vancomycin consensus guidelines: first-order calculations utilizing 2 vancomycin concentrations or a Bayesian approach. It is unknown if there is a difference in acute kidney injury (AKI) between the 2 dosing strategies for patients receiving concomitant piperacillin-tazobactam and vancomycin (VPT). Objective: The objective of this study was to compare incidence of AKI in patients being administered VPT with first-order calculations versus model-informed precision dosing (MIPD)/Bayesian dosing. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study at a community hospital. Patients who received VPT therapy for at least 48 hours were included. The primary outcome was overall incidence of AKI. Secondary outcomes included percentage target attainment with initial regimen, average serum creatinine increase, time to AKI, usable vancomycin levels, and need for temporary dialysis or intensive care unit admission. Results: There were 100 patients included (50 in the first-order group and 50 in the MIPD/Bayesian group). The overall incidence of AKI was lower in the MIPD/Bayesian group (12% vs 28%, P = 0.046). There was no difference in average serum creatinine increase, time to AKI, need for temporary dialysis, or intensive care unit admission. Patients in the MIPD/Bayesian group had a higher percentage of target attainment (46% vs 18%, P = 0.003) and usable vancomycin levels (98% vs 60%, P < 0.001). Conclusion and Relevance: In patients receiving VPT, model-informed precision dosing with Bayesian modeling resulted in a lower rate of AKI, higher target attainment, and more usable vancomycin levels compared with first-order AUC dosing. The small sample and retrospective nature of this study reinforces the need for additional data.

Background: Abrupt discontinuation of home psychotropic medications is common among critically ill patients but may precipitate clinically significant withdrawal. Objective: To determine the percent of patients with interruptions in home psychotropic medications upon intensive care unit (ICU) admission and to identify outcomes associated with these interruptions. Methods: This was an institutional review board-approved, single-center, retrospective study of critically ill patients with a history of mental illness taking an antipsychotic or antidepressant medication. The primary outcome was the percent of patients with interruption in at least one home psychotropic medication for ≥24 hours upon ICU admission. Secondary outcomes included time to psychotropic re-initiation, percent of home psychotropic medications restarted in the ICU, ICU length of stay (LOS), delirium, withdrawal-related complications, need for acute antipsychotics or benzodiazepines, and reasons for psychotropic interruption. Results: Among 183 patients, 93 (50.8%) had interruptions in home psychotropic therapy for ≥24 hours upon ICU admission. Mean time to reinitiation of at least one psychotropic agent was 1.4 days, and 16.4% of patients did not have any home psychotropics restarted. Patients with psychotropic interruption had a longer ICU LOS (P = 0.01) and greater incidence of ICU delirium (P < 0.01). Withdrawal-related complications were similar between groups. Acute antipsychotic use was greater in patients with psychotropic interruption (P < 0.01). Acute benzodiazepine use was not different between groups (P = 0.87). Most patients did not have a documented reason for therapy interruption. Conclusion and Relevance: Unless contraindicated, clinicians should attempt to restart home psychotropic medications as soon as possible in critically ill patients.

Background: Recent literature demonstrates support for using methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal swab polymerase chain reaction (NaPCR) screening as an antimicrobial stewardship tool aiding early de-escalation of anti-MRSA antimicrobials. However, immunocompromised patients have been underrepresented in previous studies despite increased risk of morbidity and mortality from multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO). Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the negative predictive value (NPV) of the MRSA NaPCR in hospitalized, immunocompromised adult patients with suspected pneumonia. Methods: A single-center, retrospective, observational review was conducted of hospitalized, immunocompromised adult patients that had an MRSA NaPCR obtained between March 1, 2020 and January 10, 2021. For inclusion, bacterial cultures must have been collected within 2 weeks after MRSA NaPCR. The primary outcome was the NPV of MRSA NaPCR in hospitalized, immunocompromised patients with suspected pneumonia. Secondary outcomes include NPV in other infections. Results: Between March 1, 2020 and January 10, 2021, 59 patients with 78 unique cultures, including 28 respiratory cultures, were included in the study. The NPV of the MRSA NaPCR for pneumonia was 91.7%. The NPV for bloodstream infections was 100% and for urinary tract infections was 100%, but interpretation of these results should be cautioned due to the small sample sizes. Conclusion: The NPV of MRSA NaPCR in pneumonia remains high in this study. The MRSA NaPCR has utility as a de-escalation tool in hospitalized, immunocompromised adult patients, but larger studies are warranted to evaluate all immunocompromised patient populations.

Background: Pharmacists are well-positioned to assist patients facing poverty with financial and well-being resource navigation. Pharmacy educators must find avenues for students that foster awareness of applicable challenges encountered by economically disadvantaged patients. Objective: This study examines the impact of a poverty simulation on pharmacy students' socioeconomic and patient advocacy attitudes and beliefs. Methods: Third year professional pharmacy students participated in the Community Action Poverty Simulation (CAPS). Students were asked to voluntarily complete a survey prior to and following their participation. The survey was based upon a combination of 3 previously validated survey tools: Attitudes Toward Poverty (ATP) scale, Medical Student Attitudes Toward the Underserved (MSATU), and the Locus of Control Scale (LCS). Students also responded to open-ended questions postsimulation. Results: Forty of the 74 students completed both the presimulation and postsimulation surveys. Significant changes were seen in a matched sample analysis for 17 of 49 survey questions. Prominent differences (decreasing agreement) came from the statements: "An able-bodied person collecting welfare is ripping off the system" and "Welfare makes people lazy"; and increasing agreement that "I feel personally responsible for providing medical care to the needy." Open-ended survey responses reflected a greater understanding of time and effort needed to locate and navigate available resources, and challenges such as adhering to medication regimens due to inability to pay. Conclusion: A poverty simulation, such as CAPS, is an effective method to encourage pharmacy students to reflect on their future impact toward patients facing the challenges of poverty. The shift in students' attitudes and beliefs on various measures revealed that the simulation had an impact on altering perceptions for those with low socioeconomic status.

Background: Sacubitril/valsartan has demonstrated benefit for patients with heart failure (HF); however, patients with advanced stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) as defined by the National Kidney Foundation have historically been underrepresented in landmark HF trials. Objective: The goal of this study is to examine the safety and efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with HF and concomitant CKD stages III to V. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective, observational study included adult patients with HF and CKD stages III to V prescribed sacubitril/valsartan during hospital admission or upon discharge from January 2017 through March 2022. The primary outcome was the comparison of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from baseline to 90 days. Key secondary outcomes included the comparison of the ejection fraction (EF) at 180 days, the rate of all-cause- and HF-related readmissions within 30 days, and adverse events. Results: Fifty patients were included in the analysis, with most patients (56%) having CKD stage IIIa. There was no difference in eGFR between baseline and 90 days (45.3 (11.2) mL/min/1.73 m² vs 45.5 (18.6) mL/min/1.73 m²; P = 0.91). EF improved between baseline and 180 days (median 22.5% [17.5-27.5] vs 30.0% [22.5-42.5]; P < 0.001). Three patients (6%) were rehospitalized within 30 days for HF-related causes. There were 6 episodes (12%) of hyperkalemia greater than 5.0 milliequivalents per liter (mEq/L), and 2 episodes (4%) greater than 5.5 mEq/L. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in eGFR from baseline to 90 days in patients with HF and CKD prescribed sacubitril/valsartan during hospitalization, though there was an observed increase in EF.

Background: Inappropriate prescribing of opioids is thought to play a central role in the ongoing opioid health crisis. Tertiary information resources are commonly used by clinicians for obtaining opioid dosing information. To assist health care providers in pain management, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) developed a guideline for prescribing opioids. Objective: To identify discrepancies for dosing information on oxycodone between commonly used tertiary drug information resources and the CDC Guideline. Methods: Searches of the tertiary drug information resources were conducted in the following order: Facts and Comparisons, Lexicomp, Medscape, and Micromedex. The term "oxycodone" was entered in the search box in the tertiary resources' applications. Drug information items retrieved were organized in tabular format. In the Google Chrome version 106.0.5249.119 search box, the term "CDC guideline for opioid dosing" was entered to retrieve current information on the CDC Guideline. Results: Searches produced drug information on oxycodone for available formulations, dosing regimens, recommended dosing, and maximum daily dose (MDD). Searches revealed discrepancies in dosing recommendations for oxycodone among tertiary drug resources and between tertiary drug resources and the CDC Guideline. Conclusions: When considering maximum daily dosing information for oxycodone from the selected tertiary drug information resources, the potential exists for patients to be at risk of addiction, overdose, and perhaps death. Improving the way opioids are prescribed through the CDC Clinical Practice Guideline can ensure patients have access to safer, more effective chronic pain treatment while reducing the number of people who misuse or overdose from inappropriate dosing information.

Objective: To review the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of vonoprazan for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in adults. Data Sources: A literature search was performed through PubMed using the following key terms: vonoprazan, Voquezna, TAK-438, potassium-competitive acid blocker, H pylori, and gastrointestinal. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Selected articles included those which described clinical studies of the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety, or tolerability of vonoprazan. Data Synthesis: Vonoprazan works by competing with potassium on the proton pump to inhibit gastric acid secretion. Phase 3 clinical trials have shown that vonoprazan is noninferior to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) as a component of H pylori eradication regimens. Vonoprazan has also shown promise in duodenal ulcer-healing rates and in reducing symptoms of heartburn. Common adverse effects associated with vonoprazan include nasopharyngitis, diarrhea, constipation, flatulence, dyspepsia, headache, and abdominal pain. Conclusion: Clinical practice guidelines recommend PPIs as the antisecretory agent of choice in H pylori eradication regimens with histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) as potential alternatives. However, the use of either class of medications may be limited by adverse effects, drug interactions, and tolerability. Potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs), like vonoprazan, may be safe and effective alternative antisecretory agents for H pylori eradication regimens, as well as other gastrointestinal disorders.

Objective: To evaluate data sources pertaining to the safety and efficacy of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor use for diabetes management in patients following kidney transplantation. Data Sources: A literature search was conducted through PubMed (1966-January 2023), EMBASE (1973-January 2023), and clinicaltrials.gov databases using the search terms kidney transplantation, diabetes mellitus, and SGLT2 inhibitor or empagliflozin, dapagliflozin, and canagliflozin. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Studies evaluating human kidney transplant recipients (KTR) receiving SGLT2 inhibitors treatment and published in the English language were included. Eight case series or retrospective analyses, 4 prospective observational studies, and 1 randomized controlled trial were identified. Data Synthesis: Available literature provides evidence that the addition of SGLT2 inhibitors may provide modest benefits on glycemic control, body weight, and serum uric acid levels in certain KTR. Various studies and case reports found that incidence of urinary tract infections was low, but still present. Overall, there are limited data on mortality and graft survival; however, one study reported a benefit of SGLT2 inhibitor use in KTR relative to these outcomes. Conclusions: The current literature evaluated demonstrates that there may be benefit to the addition of SGLT2 inhibitors for diabetes management in select KTR. However, the limited evidence within a large diverse population and extended duration of treatment makes it difficult to definitively identify the true efficacy and safety of SGLT2 inhibitor use in this population.

Background: Two common dosing strategies for vancomycin are trough-based and area under the curve (AUC)-based dosing. Objective: To compare the incidence of nephrotoxicity in trough-based dosing group with the single trough-based AUC dosing at the Salem VA Medical Center. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who received trough-based dosing of vancomycin between January 1, 2017, and January 1, 2019 (preimplementation group) and AUC-based dosing (postimplementation) between October 1, 2019, and October 1, 2021, at the Salem VA Medical Center. The primary outcome was nephrotoxicity at 96 hours, 7 days, and entire hospital length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission and all-cause mortality rates, cumulative doses at 24, 48, and 72 hours, and percentage of patients considered at goal (AUC 400-600 or trough between 10 and 20 mg/L). Propensity score (PS) matching was utilized to adjust for confounding. Results: After PS matching 100 patients were included in preimplementation and 95 patients in the postimplementation group. The average study patient was a 68-year-old white male. There was significant reduction in the risk of nephrotoxicity in postimplementation cohort at 96 hours (adjusted (a)HR: 0.28, 95% CI (0.12-0.66); 7 days (aHR: 0.39, 95% CI (0.18-0.85); and entire hospital LOS (aHR: 0.46, 95% CI (0.22-0.95). Secondary outcomes showed no difference between the groups except significantly higher proportion of patients were considered at therapeutic goal in the postimplementation cohort compared with pre-implementation cohort. Conclusion: This hypothesis generating study shows that AUC-based dosing calculated using single trough concentration may result in reduced rate of nephrotoxicity than trough-based dosing.