Pub Date : 2025-10-03DOI: 10.1177/87551225251369328
Stanley V Thomas, Mark A Malesker, Daniel E Hilleman, Naresh A Dewan
Objective: To evaluate the potential for drug interactions with pharmacotherapy for central hypersomnolence (modafinil, armodafinil, solriamfetol, pitolisant, sodium oxybate, methylphenidate, amphetamine, lithium, clarithromycin). Data Sources: A systemic literature search (1980 to June 2025) was performed using PUBMED, SCOPUS, and EMBASE to locate relevant articles. The MeSH terms included specific medication and "drug interactions." DAILYMED was used for product-specific interactions. Study Selection and Data Extraction: The search was conducted to identify drug interactions with excessive daytime sleepiness treatments. The search was limited to those articles studying humans and publications using the English language. Case reports, clinical trials, review articles, treatment guidelines, and package labeling were selected for inclusion. Data Synthesis: Primary literature and package labeling indicate that pharmacotherapy for central hypersomnolence is subject to both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions. While some interactions can be clinically significant, much of the data available for potential drug interactions was found in the package labeling and not from the primary literature. Conclusions: Available literature indicates that pharmacotherapy for central hypersomnolence is associated with clinically significant drug interventions and subsequent possible adverse reactions. Clinicians in all practice settings should be mindful of the potential to minimize drug interactions and optimize pharmacotherapy for hypersomnolence.
{"title":"Drug Interactions With Excessive Daytime Sleepiness Treatments.","authors":"Stanley V Thomas, Mark A Malesker, Daniel E Hilleman, Naresh A Dewan","doi":"10.1177/87551225251369328","DOIUrl":"10.1177/87551225251369328","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the potential for drug interactions with pharmacotherapy for central hypersomnolence (modafinil, armodafinil, solriamfetol, pitolisant, sodium oxybate, methylphenidate, amphetamine, lithium, clarithromycin). <b>Data Sources:</b> A systemic literature search (1980 to June 2025) was performed using PUBMED, SCOPUS, and EMBASE to locate relevant articles. The MeSH terms included specific medication and \"drug interactions.\" DAILYMED was used for product-specific interactions. <b>Study Selection and Data Extraction:</b> The search was conducted to identify drug interactions with excessive daytime sleepiness treatments. The search was limited to those articles studying humans and publications using the English language. Case reports, clinical trials, review articles, treatment guidelines, and package labeling were selected for inclusion. <b>Data Synthesis:</b> Primary literature and package labeling indicate that pharmacotherapy for central hypersomnolence is subject to both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions. While some interactions can be clinically significant, much of the data available for potential drug interactions was found in the package labeling and not from the primary literature. <b>Conclusions:</b> Available literature indicates that pharmacotherapy for central hypersomnolence is associated with clinically significant drug interventions and subsequent possible adverse reactions. Clinicians in all practice settings should be mindful of the potential to minimize drug interactions and optimize pharmacotherapy for hypersomnolence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":" ","pages":"87551225251369328"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496447/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145238941","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01DOI: 10.1177/87551225251377987
Katherine Hammaker, Stephanie Bills, Taylor H Cason, Nicholas J Quinn, Rhonda Cadena, Alyssa Lear
Background: In patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS), tenecteplase and alteplase help preserve brain tissue. The 2019 American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines designate alteplase as the first-line therapy for AIS, listing tenecteplase as a reasonable alternative for patients eligible for mechanical thrombectomy. The 2023 European Stroke Organisation recommends tenecteplase in patients with AIS due to large vessel occlusion prior to thrombectomy. Our institution adopted tenecteplase as the formulary fibrinolytic for AIS due to emerging clinical data, reduced cost, and operational benefits. Objective: The objective was to compare outcomes associated with tenecteplase versus alteplase in AIS. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study included adults treated with tenecteplase or alteplase for AIS between April 1, 2022 and April 1, 2023. The primary outcome was intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) within 36 hours. Secondary outcomes included hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, in-hospital all-cause mortality, door-to-needle time, time to reperfusion, and adverse events. A subgroup analysis was performed to assess ICH that required reversal therapies. Results: There was no significant difference in the incidence of ICH between the tenecteplase and alteplase groups (20.4% vs 11.7%; P = 0.09). Within the subgroup analysis, a higher proportion of patients in the tenecteplase group required reversal therapies for ICH compared with the alteplase group (35.0% vs 8.3%; P = 0.09). Secondary outcomes were similar between groups. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the incidence of ICH after tenecteplase or alteplase administration. Further studies are warranted to clarify the comparative safety profiles of tenecteplase and alteplase.
背景:在急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者中,替奈普酶和阿替普酶有助于保护脑组织。2019年美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会指南将阿替普酶指定为AIS的一线治疗,将特替普酶列为符合机械取栓条件的患者的合理替代方案。2023年欧洲卒中组织推荐在取栓前大血管闭塞的AIS患者使用tenecteplase。由于新出现的临床数据、降低的成本和操作效益,我们机构采用替奈普酶作为AIS的处方纤溶药物。目的:目的是比较替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗AIS的相关结果。方法:这项多中心回顾性研究纳入了2022年4月1日至2023年4月1日期间接受替奈普酶或阿替普酶治疗AIS的成年人。主要结局为36小时内颅内出血(ICH)。次要结局包括住院和重症监护病房的住院时间、院内全因死亡率、从门到针的时间、再灌注时间和不良事件。进行亚组分析以评估需要逆转治疗的脑出血。结果:替奈普酶组与阿替普酶组脑出血发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(20.4% vs 11.7%; P = 0.09)。在亚组分析中,与阿替普酶组相比,tenecteplase组患者需要脑出血逆转治疗的比例更高(35.0% vs 8.3%; P = 0.09)。两组间的次要结果相似。结论:替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗后脑出血发生率无显著性差异。需要进一步的研究来阐明替奈普酶和阿替普酶的相对安全性。
{"title":"Comparative Risk of Intracranial Hemorrhage With Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke.","authors":"Katherine Hammaker, Stephanie Bills, Taylor H Cason, Nicholas J Quinn, Rhonda Cadena, Alyssa Lear","doi":"10.1177/87551225251377987","DOIUrl":"10.1177/87551225251377987","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> In patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS), tenecteplase and alteplase help preserve brain tissue. The 2019 American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines designate alteplase as the first-line therapy for AIS, listing tenecteplase as a reasonable alternative for patients eligible for mechanical thrombectomy. The 2023 European Stroke Organisation recommends tenecteplase in patients with AIS due to large vessel occlusion prior to thrombectomy. Our institution adopted tenecteplase as the formulary fibrinolytic for AIS due to emerging clinical data, reduced cost, and operational benefits. <b>Objective:</b> The objective was to compare outcomes associated with tenecteplase versus alteplase in AIS. <b>Methods:</b> This multicenter, retrospective study included adults treated with tenecteplase or alteplase for AIS between April 1, 2022 and April 1, 2023. The primary outcome was intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) within 36 hours. Secondary outcomes included hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, in-hospital all-cause mortality, door-to-needle time, time to reperfusion, and adverse events. A subgroup analysis was performed to assess ICH that required reversal therapies. <b>Results:</b> There was no significant difference in the incidence of ICH between the tenecteplase and alteplase groups (20.4% vs 11.7%; <i>P</i> = 0.09). Within the subgroup analysis, a higher proportion of patients in the tenecteplase group required reversal therapies for ICH compared with the alteplase group (35.0% vs 8.3%; <i>P</i> = 0.09). Secondary outcomes were similar between groups. <b>Conclusion</b>: There was no significant difference in the incidence of ICH after tenecteplase or alteplase administration. Further studies are warranted to clarify the comparative safety profiles of tenecteplase and alteplase.</p>","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":" ","pages":"87551225251377987"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12491217/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145232765","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-29DOI: 10.1177/87551225251375346
Alex Adams, Edward J Timmons
Universal Licensing Recognition (ULR) laws have emerged as a key policy tool to improve license mobility by allowing licensure obtained in one state to be more easily recognized in another. While these reforms have increased access to licensure and employment opportunities, they generally apply only to initial licensure, not to renewal. Nearly all state boards of pharmacy require continuing education (CE) for license renewal, yet CE requirements vary significantly across states in terms of hours, topics, formats, reporting frequency, and approved providers. These discrepancies create substantial administrative burdens for pharmacists maintaining active licenses in multiple jurisdictions. This article examines the implications of extending ULR principles to license renewal, using a case study of a pharmacist licensed in West Virginia and neighboring states. The analysis suggests that pharmacists working across state lines often default to the most restrictive CE standards to ensure compliance, incurring unnecessary cost and complexity. We highlight Idaho's 2024 reform to its ULR statute, which exempts multistate licensees from duplicative CE requirements if they comply with their home state's CE standards and limits overall CE burdens based on regional averages. These reforms offer a promising model for pharmacy regulators seeking to reduce administrative friction, support workforce flexibility, and enhance access to care without compromising professional standards.
{"title":"Extending Universal Licensing Recognition (ULR) Laws to Licensure Renewal: A Pharmacist Case Study.","authors":"Alex Adams, Edward J Timmons","doi":"10.1177/87551225251375346","DOIUrl":"10.1177/87551225251375346","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Universal Licensing Recognition (ULR) laws have emerged as a key policy tool to improve license mobility by allowing licensure obtained in one state to be more easily recognized in another. While these reforms have increased access to licensure and employment opportunities, they generally apply only to initial licensure, not to renewal. Nearly all state boards of pharmacy require continuing education (CE) for license renewal, yet CE requirements vary significantly across states in terms of hours, topics, formats, reporting frequency, and approved providers. These discrepancies create substantial administrative burdens for pharmacists maintaining active licenses in multiple jurisdictions. This article examines the implications of extending ULR principles to license renewal, using a case study of a pharmacist licensed in West Virginia and neighboring states. The analysis suggests that pharmacists working across state lines often default to the most restrictive CE standards to ensure compliance, incurring unnecessary cost and complexity. We highlight Idaho's 2024 reform to its ULR statute, which exempts multistate licensees from duplicative CE requirements if they comply with their home state's CE standards and limits overall CE burdens based on regional averages. These reforms offer a promising model for pharmacy regulators seeking to reduce administrative friction, support workforce flexibility, and enhance access to care without compromising professional standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":" ","pages":"87551225251375346"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12479455/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145206671","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-09DOI: 10.1177/87551225251369344
David Hensler, Danielle Burghardt
Objective: Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) may enhance the elimination of drugs from human plasma. Removal of apixaban during TPE has not been extensively described previously. Case: This is a retrospective report of a 76-year-old man admitted to the hospital on apixaban with acute worsening of respiratory and bulbar symptoms due to myasthenia gravis. On hospital day (HOD) 1, TPE was initiated for management of myasthenic crisis. Apixaban levels were obtained before and after a TPE session on HOD 3. On HOD 3, the patient's apixaban plasma level decreased from 88 ng/mL before TPE to 81 ng/mL after. Apixaban displayed an elimination half-life of 65.5 hours with intervening TPE. Discussion/conclusions: We report no clinically significant apixaban removal in a patient undergoing TPE for myasthenic crisis. This differs from previous reports. Supplemental dosing or rescheduling of apixaban doses around TPE sessions may be unnecessary, though more data are needed.
{"title":"Effect of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange on Apixaban Plasma Levels.","authors":"David Hensler, Danielle Burghardt","doi":"10.1177/87551225251369344","DOIUrl":"10.1177/87551225251369344","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) may enhance the elimination of drugs from human plasma. Removal of apixaban during TPE has not been extensively described previously. <b>Case:</b> This is a retrospective report of a 76-year-old man admitted to the hospital on apixaban with acute worsening of respiratory and bulbar symptoms due to myasthenia gravis. On hospital day (HOD) 1, TPE was initiated for management of myasthenic crisis. Apixaban levels were obtained before and after a TPE session on HOD 3. On HOD 3, the patient's apixaban plasma level decreased from 88 ng/mL before TPE to 81 ng/mL after. Apixaban displayed an elimination half-life of 65.5 hours with intervening TPE. <b>Discussion/conclusions:</b> We report no clinically significant apixaban removal in a patient undergoing TPE for myasthenic crisis. This differs from previous reports. Supplemental dosing or rescheduling of apixaban doses around TPE sessions may be unnecessary, though more data are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":" ","pages":"87551225251369344"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12420647/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145040555","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-09DOI: 10.1177/87551225251372486
Mariah I Sigala, Corey V Dinunno, Chelsea N Lopez, Luma Succar, Jenny H Petkova, Edward A Graviss, Duc T Nguyen, Kevin R Donahue
Background: The increased utilization of oral factor Xa inhibitors (FXaI) has led to a growing interest in the clinical utility of FXaI-specific anti-Xa concentrations. Critically ill populations are at risk of bleeding secondary to FXaI accumulation in the setting of end-organ dysfunction. To mitigate this risk, an FXaI anti-Xa concentration-guided approach to transitioning between oral and parenteral anticoagulation has been explored. Objective: To compare the incidence of bleeding upon intensive care unit (ICU) admission between 2 different FXaI transition strategies: concentration versus non-concentration-guided. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients admitted between January 2019 and May 2022 with objective evidence of FXaI exposure within 48 hours preceding ICU admission. Patients were excluded if they were admitted to the ICU with a primary diagnosis related to a bleeding event, received a non-FXaI anticoagulant 48 hours preceding ICU admission, remained off anticoagulation during their ICU admission, or underwent surgical procedures. The primary outcome was the incidence of major bleeding within 5 days of ICU admission. Thromboembolic events were evaluated as a secondary endpoint. Results: A total of 433 patients (184 concentration-guided vs 249 non-concentration-guided) were included. There was no difference in major bleeding between groups (2.7% in concentration-guided vs 3.6% in non-concentration-guided; P = 0.79). Thromboembolic complications were similar between groups (1.6% in concentration-guided vs 2.0% in non-concentration-guided; P = 1.00) despite a longer time from last FXaI dose to anticoagulant transition in the concentration-guided group (29.9 hours vs 19.4 hours; P < 0.01). Conclusion and relevance: Use of FXaI concentrations to guide anticoagulation transition in the ICU had no impact on major bleeding events or thromboembolic complications. Further analyses are needed to validate FXaI concentration-guided strategies and solidify anti-Xa cutoffs to create a standardized approach to FXaI transitions in the critically ill patient population.
{"title":"Direct Oral Anticoagulant Transition Strategies Using Anti-Xa Concentrations Upon Intensive Care Unit Admission.","authors":"Mariah I Sigala, Corey V Dinunno, Chelsea N Lopez, Luma Succar, Jenny H Petkova, Edward A Graviss, Duc T Nguyen, Kevin R Donahue","doi":"10.1177/87551225251372486","DOIUrl":"10.1177/87551225251372486","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The increased utilization of oral factor Xa inhibitors (FXaI) has led to a growing interest in the clinical utility of FXaI-specific anti-Xa concentrations. Critically ill populations are at risk of bleeding secondary to FXaI accumulation in the setting of end-organ dysfunction. To mitigate this risk, an FXaI anti-Xa concentration-guided approach to transitioning between oral and parenteral anticoagulation has been explored. <b>Objective:</b> To compare the incidence of bleeding upon intensive care unit (ICU) admission between 2 different FXaI transition strategies: concentration versus non-concentration-guided. <b>Methods:</b> We performed a retrospective chart review of patients admitted between January 2019 and May 2022 with objective evidence of FXaI exposure within 48 hours preceding ICU admission. Patients were excluded if they were admitted to the ICU with a primary diagnosis related to a bleeding event, received a non-FXaI anticoagulant 48 hours preceding ICU admission, remained off anticoagulation during their ICU admission, or underwent surgical procedures. The primary outcome was the incidence of major bleeding within 5 days of ICU admission. Thromboembolic events were evaluated as a secondary endpoint. <b>Results:</b> A total of 433 patients (184 concentration-guided vs 249 non-concentration-guided) were included. There was no difference in major bleeding between groups (2.7% in concentration-guided vs 3.6% in non-concentration-guided; <i>P</i> = 0.79). Thromboembolic complications were similar between groups (1.6% in concentration-guided vs 2.0% in non-concentration-guided; <i>P</i> = 1.00) despite a longer time from last FXaI dose to anticoagulant transition in the concentration-guided group (29.9 hours vs 19.4 hours; <i>P</i> < 0.01). <b>Conclusion and relevance:</b> Use of FXaI concentrations to guide anticoagulation transition in the ICU had no impact on major bleeding events or thromboembolic complications. Further analyses are needed to validate FXaI concentration-guided strategies and solidify anti-Xa cutoffs to create a standardized approach to FXaI transitions in the critically ill patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":" ","pages":"87551225251372486"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12420637/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145040618","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-09DOI: 10.1177/87551225251369348
Nicole Sunshine, Rachel M Kenney, Nathan A Everson, Christen J Arena, Erin Eriksson, Brian M Church, Jacob Manteuffel, Michael P Veve
Background: The 2021 Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) sexually transmitted infection treatment guidelines recommend a 7-day course of metronidazole or single-dose tinidazole for women with trichomoniasis due to improved patient outcomes compared with single-dose metronidazole therapy. A health system antimicrobial stewardship program implemented an interruptive electronic health record (EHR) alert to promote optimal trichomoniasis prescribing when nonrecommended treatment is ordered. Objective: To determine the impact of an interruptive EHR alert on optimal trichomoniasis prescribing for women. Methods: This was an institutional review board-approved, single pretest, posttest quasi-experiment of women ≥15 years with a microbiologically confirmed Trichomonas vaginalis infection from 10/2023 to 12/2023 (preintervention) and 10/2024 to 12/2024 (postintervention). An EHR alert was implemented 9/2024 that notifies prescribers that single-dose metronidazole 2 g is not recommended and suggests CDC-recommended treatments. The primary outcome was the proportion of single-dose metronidazole 2 g orders before and after EHR alert implementation. A secondary cross-sectional evaluation of all alerts triggered from 10/2024 to 12/2024 was performed and included the number of alerts, location of alert, and provider response. Results: A total of 285 patients were included, 49.8% pre-intervention and 50.2% postintervention. Metronidazole 2 g was prescribed for 8.45% of pre-intervention and 2.80% of postintervention patients (P = 0.038). The clinical support alert fired 102 times for 75 patients during the 3-month postimplementation period. The alert was associated with a change in intended prescription to a metronidazole 7-day course in greater than 60% of patients over 3 months. Conclusion: The implementation of an interruptive alert was associated with high acceptance and improved prescribing for women treated for trichomoniasis.
{"title":"Impact of an Interruptive Alert on the Number of Women Receiving CDC-Recommended Therapy for Trichomoniasis.","authors":"Nicole Sunshine, Rachel M Kenney, Nathan A Everson, Christen J Arena, Erin Eriksson, Brian M Church, Jacob Manteuffel, Michael P Veve","doi":"10.1177/87551225251369348","DOIUrl":"10.1177/87551225251369348","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The 2021 Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) sexually transmitted infection treatment guidelines recommend a 7-day course of metronidazole or single-dose tinidazole for women with trichomoniasis due to improved patient outcomes compared with single-dose metronidazole therapy. A health system antimicrobial stewardship program implemented an interruptive electronic health record (EHR) alert to promote optimal trichomoniasis prescribing when nonrecommended treatment is ordered. <b>Objective:</b> To determine the impact of an interruptive EHR alert on optimal trichomoniasis prescribing for women. <b>Methods:</b> This was an institutional review board-approved, single pretest, posttest quasi-experiment of women ≥15 years with a microbiologically confirmed <i>Trichomonas vaginalis</i> infection from 10/2023 to 12/2023 (preintervention) and 10/2024 to 12/2024 (postintervention). An EHR alert was implemented 9/2024 that notifies prescribers that single-dose metronidazole 2 g is not recommended and suggests CDC-recommended treatments. The primary outcome was the proportion of single-dose metronidazole 2 g orders before and after EHR alert implementation. A secondary cross-sectional evaluation of all alerts triggered from 10/2024 to 12/2024 was performed and included the number of alerts, location of alert, and provider response. <b>Results:</b> A total of 285 patients were included, 49.8% pre-intervention and 50.2% postintervention. Metronidazole 2 g was prescribed for 8.45% of pre-intervention and 2.80% of postintervention patients (<i>P</i> = 0.038). The clinical support alert fired 102 times for 75 patients during the 3-month postimplementation period. The alert was associated with a change in intended prescription to a metronidazole 7-day course in greater than 60% of patients over 3 months. <b>Conclusion:</b> The implementation of an interruptive alert was associated with high acceptance and improved prescribing for women treated for trichomoniasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":" ","pages":"87551225251369348"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12420646/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145040119","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-31DOI: 10.1177/87551225251366324
M Gabriela Cabanilla, Aileen C Scheibner, Jorge R Mera
Background:Legionella pneumonia is a significant cause of community-acquired pneumonia that often requires timely and effective treatment. While fluoroquinolones and macrolides are the recommended first-line therapies, doxycycline offers an alternative with favorable pharmacokinetics, safety, and minimal drug-drug interactions. Methods: We describe three hospitalized patients with Legionella pneumonia who received doxycycline monotherapy.Clinical outcomes, including symptom resolution and survival, were assessed at 60 days. A literature review was also performed for studies published between 1980 and 2025 that evaluated doxycycline for Legionella infection. Results: All three patients achieved clinical improvement with doxycycline monotherapy, with resolution of presenting symptoms and survival at 60 days post-hospitalization. The literature review identified limited clinical data on doxycycline for Legionella pneumonia. In vitro data suggested that doxycycline may have lower bactericidal activity than fluoroquinolones, although its pharmacological profile and tolerability support its consideration in select cases. Conclusion: Doxycycline monotherapy was associated with favorable outcomes in three cases of Legionella pneumonia. Although the evidence remains sparse, doxycycline may represent a viable alternative when first-line therapy is contraindicated. Further research is required to define its role in the treatment of Legionella pneumonia.
{"title":"Doxycycline for <i>Legionella</i> Pneumonia: Expanding Treatment Horizons Through a Case Series and Narrative Review.","authors":"M Gabriela Cabanilla, Aileen C Scheibner, Jorge R Mera","doi":"10.1177/87551225251366324","DOIUrl":"10.1177/87551225251366324","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> <i>Legionella</i> pneumonia is a significant cause of community-acquired pneumonia that often requires timely and effective treatment. While fluoroquinolones and macrolides are the recommended first-line therapies, doxycycline offers an alternative with favorable pharmacokinetics, safety, and minimal drug-drug interactions. <b>Methods:</b> We describe three hospitalized patients with <i>Legionella</i> pneumonia who received doxycycline monotherapy.Clinical outcomes, including symptom resolution and survival, were assessed at 60 days. A literature review was also performed for studies published between 1980 and 2025 that evaluated doxycycline for Legionella infection. <b>Results:</b> All three patients achieved clinical improvement with doxycycline monotherapy, with resolution of presenting symptoms and survival at 60 days post-hospitalization. The literature review identified limited clinical data on doxycycline for Legionella pneumonia. In vitro data suggested that doxycycline may have lower bactericidal activity than fluoroquinolones, although its pharmacological profile and tolerability support its consideration in select cases. <b>Conclusion</b>: Doxycycline monotherapy was associated with favorable outcomes in three cases of Legionella pneumonia. Although the evidence remains sparse, doxycycline may represent a viable alternative when first-line therapy is contraindicated. Further research is required to define its role in the treatment of <i>Legionella</i> pneumonia.</p>","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":" ","pages":"87551225251366324"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12399582/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144992864","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-22DOI: 10.1177/87551225251364516
Morgan Thomas, Cameron Lanier, Kelly Covert
Background: Cirrhosis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States, with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) being a serious complication. Established SBP risk factors include gastrointestinal bleeding and low ascitic protein, but the role of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) remains unclear. Objective: This study evaluated the impact of PPI use on primary SBP development in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis. Additional objectives included reviewing PPI prescribing patterns and associated clinical outcomes. Methods: An institutional review board-approved, retrospective chart review was conducted on adults (≥18 years) with cirrhosis admitted for presumed SBP between June 1, 2022, and June 30, 2024. Exclusion criteria included pregnancy, incarceration, and recent or current upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Patients were grouped by PPI exposure, defined as PPI use prior to admission. The primary outcome was SBP incidence; secondary outcomes included mortality and hepatic decompensation events. Results: Eighty-one patients were included: 42 reported home PPI therapy, and 39 did not. SBP incidence was 33.3% in the PPI group versus 20.5% in the no PPI group (χ2 = 0.249, P = 0.618). Worsening ascites occurred in 99%, encephalopathy in 42%, varices in 11%, and suspected hepatorenal syndrome in 21%. In-hospital mortality was 9.9%. PPI indications were often undocumented. Conclusion and Relevance: Although no significant association was found between home PPI use and SBP, frequent undocumented use and potential overuse of PPIs underscore the need for targeted intervention. Pharmacists are well-positioned to lead stewardship efforts by reviewing indications and minimizing unnecessary therapy to enhance safety and outcomes.
背景:肝硬化是美国发病率和死亡率的主要原因,自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)是一种严重的并发症。已知的收缩压危险因素包括胃肠道出血和腹水蛋白水平低,但质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)的作用尚不清楚。目的:本研究评估PPI使用对肝硬化住院患者原发性收缩压发展的影响。其他目标包括回顾PPI处方模式和相关临床结果。方法:对2022年6月1日至2024年6月30日期间因推测收缩压而入院的肝硬化成人(≥18岁)进行了机构审查委员会批准的回顾性图表审查。排除标准包括妊娠、嵌顿、近期或当前上消化道出血。患者按PPI暴露分组,定义为入院前使用PPI。主要观察指标为收缩压发生率;次要结局包括死亡率和肝脏失代偿事件。结果:纳入81例患者:42例报告家庭PPI治疗,39例未报告家庭PPI治疗。PPI组的收缩压发生率为33.3%,未使用PPI组为20.5% (χ2 = 0.249, P = 0.618)。腹水恶化发生率为99%,脑病发生率为42%,静脉曲张发生率为11%,疑似肝肾综合征发生率为21%。住院死亡率为9.9%。PPI适应症通常没有记录。结论和相关性:虽然没有发现家庭PPI使用与收缩压之间的显著关联,但频繁的无证使用和潜在的PPI过度使用强调了有针对性干预的必要性。药剂师有能力通过审查适应症和尽量减少不必要的治疗来提高安全性和疗效,从而领导管理工作。
{"title":"Proton Pump Inhibitor Use in Patients With Cirrhosis and Its Association With Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis.","authors":"Morgan Thomas, Cameron Lanier, Kelly Covert","doi":"10.1177/87551225251364516","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225251364516","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Cirrhosis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States, with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) being a serious complication. Established SBP risk factors include gastrointestinal bleeding and low ascitic protein, but the role of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) remains unclear. <b>Objective:</b> This study evaluated the impact of PPI use on primary SBP development in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis. Additional objectives included reviewing PPI prescribing patterns and associated clinical outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> An institutional review board-approved, retrospective chart review was conducted on adults (≥18 years) with cirrhosis admitted for presumed SBP between June 1, 2022, and June 30, 2024. Exclusion criteria included pregnancy, incarceration, and recent or current upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Patients were grouped by PPI exposure, defined as PPI use prior to admission. The primary outcome was SBP incidence; secondary outcomes included mortality and hepatic decompensation events. <b>Results:</b> Eighty-one patients were included: 42 reported home PPI therapy, and 39 did not. SBP incidence was 33.3% in the PPI group versus 20.5% in the no PPI group (χ<sup>2</sup> = 0.249, <i>P</i> = 0.618). Worsening ascites occurred in 99%, encephalopathy in 42%, varices in 11%, and suspected hepatorenal syndrome in 21%. In-hospital mortality was 9.9%. PPI indications were often undocumented. <b>Conclusion and Relevance:</b> Although no significant association was found between home PPI use and SBP, frequent undocumented use and potential overuse of PPIs underscore the need for targeted intervention. Pharmacists are well-positioned to lead stewardship efforts by reviewing indications and minimizing unnecessary therapy to enhance safety and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":" ","pages":"87551225251364516"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12373648/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144958283","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-21DOI: 10.1177/87551225251363426
Makayla F Hoke, Katelyn A Butler, Marcos J Ortiz-Uriarte, Andrew J Franck
Background: Refeeding syndrome (RS) is a potentially life-threatening condition, marked by decreases in serum phosphorus, potassium, or magnesium, that commonly occurs in patients who receive parenteral nutrition (PN) after a period of inadequate caloric intake. Objective: To compare the occurrence and severity of RS in hospitalized patients who received intravenous (IV) electrolyte supplementation versus those who did not receive IV electrolyte supplementation prior to initiation of PN. Methods: This single-center, retrospective cohort study included adult patients hospitalized over a 10-year period who received PN. The primary outcome was the occurrence of RS in each group (decrease in serum phosphorus, potassium, or magnesium of 10% or more from baseline within 5 days of PN initiation). Results: A total of 124 patients were included in the study, with 62 patients in each group. Fifty-two patients (83.9%) in the IV electrolyte supplementation group developed RS of any severity compared to 48 patients (77.4%) in the no IV electrolyte supplementation group (odds ratio [OR] = 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.62 to 3.74, P = 0.4). The IV electrolyte supplementation group developed more mild cases of RS (OR = 2.48, 95% CI = 1.14 to 5.40, P = 0.02), had a lower median decrease in serum phosphorus (median difference [MD] = -6.0, 95% CI = 10.9 to <-0.1, P = 0.03), and had lower in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.09 to 0.74, P = 0.008). There were no significant differences for other secondary outcomes. Conclusion: Overall occurrence of RS was not significantly different between groups. However, some findings were suggestive of benefit associated with IV electrolyte supplementation.
背景:再喂养综合征(RS)是一种潜在的危及生命的疾病,其特征是血清磷、钾或镁的减少,通常发生在一段时间热量摄入不足后接受肠外营养(PN)的患者中。目的:比较在PN开始前接受静脉(IV)电解质补充的住院患者与未接受静脉电解质补充的住院患者RS的发生率和严重程度。方法:这项单中心、回顾性队列研究纳入了住院10年以上接受PN治疗的成年患者。主要结局是每组RS的发生(PN开始后5天内血清磷、钾或镁较基线降低10%或更多)。结果:共纳入124例患者,每组62例。静脉补充电解质组有52例(83.9%)患者出现严重程度RS,而未补充电解质组有48例(77.4%)患者出现严重程度RS(优势比[OR] = 1.52, 95%可信区间[CI] = 0.62 ~ 3.74, P = 0.4)。静脉补充电解质组出现更多轻度RS (OR = 2.48, 95% CI = 1.14 ~ 5.40, P = 0.02),血清磷下降中位数较低(中位数差[MD] = -6.0, 95% CI = 10.9 ~ P = 0.03),住院死亡率较低(OR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.09 ~ 0.74, P = 0.008)。其他次要结局无显著差异。结论:两组间RS总发生率无显著性差异。然而,一些研究结果提示静脉补充电解质有益处。
{"title":"Effect of Intravenous Electrolyte Supplementation on Refeeding Syndrome for Patients Initiated on Parenteral Nutrition.","authors":"Makayla F Hoke, Katelyn A Butler, Marcos J Ortiz-Uriarte, Andrew J Franck","doi":"10.1177/87551225251363426","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225251363426","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Refeeding syndrome (RS) is a potentially life-threatening condition, marked by decreases in serum phosphorus, potassium, or magnesium, that commonly occurs in patients who receive parenteral nutrition (PN) after a period of inadequate caloric intake. <b>Objective:</b> To compare the occurrence and severity of RS in hospitalized patients who received intravenous (IV) electrolyte supplementation versus those who did not receive IV electrolyte supplementation prior to initiation of PN. <b>Methods:</b> This single-center, retrospective cohort study included adult patients hospitalized over a 10-year period who received PN. The primary outcome was the occurrence of RS in each group (decrease in serum phosphorus, potassium, or magnesium of 10% or more from baseline within 5 days of PN initiation). <b>Results:</b> A total of 124 patients were included in the study, with 62 patients in each group. Fifty-two patients (83.9%) in the IV electrolyte supplementation group developed RS of any severity compared to 48 patients (77.4%) in the no IV electrolyte supplementation group (odds ratio [OR] = 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.62 to 3.74, <i>P</i> = 0.4). The IV electrolyte supplementation group developed more mild cases of RS (OR = 2.48, 95% CI = 1.14 to 5.40, <i>P</i> = 0.02), had a lower median decrease in serum phosphorus (median difference [MD] = -6.0, 95% CI = 10.9 to <-0.1, <i>P</i> = 0.03), and had lower in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.09 to 0.74, <i>P</i> = 0.008). There were no significant differences for other secondary outcomes. <b>Conclusion:</b> Overall occurrence of RS was not significantly different between groups. However, some findings were suggestive of benefit associated with IV electrolyte supplementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":" ","pages":"87551225251363426"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12370671/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144958309","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-21DOI: 10.1177/87551225251362731
Elizabeth W Covington, Jihyun L Chae, Sarah Grace Gunter
Background: Bayesian modeling of vancomycin can estimate 24-hour area under the curve (AUC24) using pre-steady-state concentrations. Limited literature exists comparing Bayesian AUC24 calculations derived from steady-state versus pre-steady-state concentrations. Objective: To assess the agreement between vancomycin AUC24 calculations using pre-steady-state versus steady-state concentrations, employing Bayesian modeling. Methods: This retrospective within-subjects cohort study included patients with at least 1 pre-steady-state and 1 steady-state vancomycin concentration. Patients with age >100 years, weight <40 kg, height <60 inches, or renal dysfunction were excluded. The steady-state AUC24 from dosing software was documented with and without hiding steady-state levels from calculations. The primary outcome was agreement between AUC24 without levels hidden compared with AUC24 with steady-state levels hidden from analysis. Secondary outcomes included the agreement between AUC24 with pre-steady-state levels hidden and the percentage of patients with matching AUC24 categories. The AUC24 agreement was evaluated via Bland-Altman plot and bias via linear regression. Statistical tests were performed using SPSS statistics software (IBM Corp). Results: A total of 93 patients were included. The mean difference in AUC24 compared to AUC24 with steady-state levels hidden was 8.8 mg*h/L, and with pre-steady-state levels hidden, it was -3.7 mg*h/L. Linear regression analysis indicated a proportional bias when steady-state levels were hidden (β = 0.22; P = 0.038) but not when pre-steady-state levels were hidden. Category mismatch occurred more often when steady-state levels were hidden vs when pre-steady-state levels were hidden (26% vs 8%; P < 0.001). Conclusion and Relevance: The study demonstrated overall agreement between AUC24 compared to AUC24 with steady-state levels hidden. The mean differences in AUC24 estimates were small, no matter which level was hidden, although tighter limits of agreement were observed when steady-state levels were utilized in Bayesian calculations. Further research with larger sample sizes is necessary.
{"title":"A Retrospective Within-Subjects Analysis of Vancomycin Bayesian Modeling With Pre-steady-State vs Steady-State Concentrations.","authors":"Elizabeth W Covington, Jihyun L Chae, Sarah Grace Gunter","doi":"10.1177/87551225251362731","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225251362731","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Bayesian modeling of vancomycin can estimate 24-hour area under the curve (AUC<sub>24</sub>) using pre-steady-state concentrations. Limited literature exists comparing Bayesian AUC<sub>24</sub> calculations derived from steady-state versus pre-steady-state concentrations. <b>Objective:</b> To assess the agreement between vancomycin AUC<sub>24</sub> calculations using pre-steady-state versus steady-state concentrations, employing Bayesian modeling. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective within-subjects cohort study included patients with at least 1 pre-steady-state and 1 steady-state vancomycin concentration. Patients with age >100 years, weight <40 kg, height <60 inches, or renal dysfunction were excluded. The steady-state AUC<sub>24</sub> from dosing software was documented with and without hiding steady-state levels from calculations. The primary outcome was agreement between AUC<sub>24</sub> without levels hidden compared with AUC<sub>24</sub> with steady-state levels hidden from analysis. Secondary outcomes included the agreement between AUC<sub>24</sub> with pre-steady-state levels hidden and the percentage of patients with matching AUC<sub>24</sub> categories. The AUC<sub>24</sub> agreement was evaluated via Bland-Altman plot and bias via linear regression. Statistical tests were performed using SPSS statistics software (IBM Corp). <b>Results:</b> A total of 93 patients were included. The mean difference in AUC<sub>24</sub> compared to AUC<sub>24</sub> with steady-state levels hidden was 8.8 mg*h/L, and with pre-steady-state levels hidden, it was -3.7 mg*h/L. Linear regression analysis indicated a proportional bias when steady-state levels were hidden (β = 0.22; <i>P</i> = 0.038) but not when pre-steady-state levels were hidden. Category mismatch occurred more often when steady-state levels were hidden vs when pre-steady-state levels were hidden (26% vs 8%; <i>P</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusion and Relevance:</b> The study demonstrated overall agreement between AUC<sub>24</sub> compared to AUC<sub>24</sub> with steady-state levels hidden. The mean differences in AUC<sub>24</sub> estimates were small, no matter which level was hidden, although tighter limits of agreement were observed when steady-state levels were utilized in Bayesian calculations. Further research with larger sample sizes is necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":" ","pages":"87551225251362731"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12370660/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144958327","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}