Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are known to have similar efficacy with a decreased risk of bleeding when compared to warfarin for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). In patients with obesity, there are limited data regarding the safety and efficacy of DOACs. Despite concerns for both under- and over-dosing patients with extremes of body weight, there are no dose adjustment recommendations in the package inserts for any of the DOACs. Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of DOACs versus warfarin for the treatment of VTE in patients with obesity. Methods: This single-center, retrospective cohort study included obese patients initiated on DOAC or warfarin therapy for VTE from January 2015 to January 2022. Patients with cancer, hypercoagulable disorders, end-stage kidney disease, or pregnancy were excluded. The primary endpoint was VTE recurrence. Secondary endpoints included major and minor bleeding. Results: A total of 120 patients met criteria for inclusion. Ninety-two received DOAC therapy and 28 received warfarin. The primary endpoint occurred in 4 patients in the DOAC group and 3 patients in the warfarin group (P = 0.35). Major bleeding occurred in 2 patients. Minor bleeding events occurred in 10 (8.33%) patients. Of those, 6 (6.5%) events occurred in patients receiving a DOAC and 4 (14.3%) events occurred in patients receiving warfarin (P = 0.28). Limitations of this study include the retrospective single-center study design. Conclusions: There was a comparable risk of bleeding and recurrent VTE between DOACs and warfarin in patients initiated on therapy for VTE.
Background: Transition of care (TOC) refers to the movement of patients between different health care settings due to changes in medical conditions and needs. Pharmacists can play an important role in TOC services as polypharmacy is a common reason for hospital readmission that costs the US taxpayers an average of $17 billion annually. Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of TOC telehealth services provided by pharmacy students at a university-based call center on 30-day hospital readmission. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, an electronic chart review was conducted for patients who were discharged from the hospital and received a telephone call from pharmacy students. Patients were referred to the pharmacy team from a primary care provider office. The co-primary endpoints were the number of 30-day all-cause hospital readmissions (including emergency department visits) and 30-day readmission due to initial admission diagnosis in patients who received a telephonic TOC call from a pharmacy student compared with patients who declined or were unable to be reached. Types of pharmacy-related TOC interventions provided by students were also collected. Results: A total of 84 patients were included in this study. All-cause 30-day readmission was similar between groups (13% vs 15.8%), whereas 30-day readmission due to initial admission diagnosis was much lower in the intervention group (5.9% vs 11.1%). Although a positive trend was observed in favor of the intervention group, a statistically significant difference was not observed for both 30-day all-cause readmission and 30-day readmission due to initial admission diagnosis. Medication reconciliation, adherence counseling, and lifestyle education (diet, exercise) are the most common topics discussed with the patients during TOC interventions. Conclusion: Using student pharmacists to provide postdischarge TOC calls can be a benefit to the patient and the health care team while offering pharmacy students valuable learning experience prior to graduation.