Journal of Pharmacy Technology最新文献

Background: The 2019 coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) led to an expanded scope of practice for pharmacy technicians. As the pandemic wanes, state governments are faced with the decision of whether or not to make permanent the authority of pharmacy technicians to perform extended duties. Objective: Determine the impacts on patient safety and job market demands preadoption and postadoption of Idaho's expanded technician duties in 2017 as a natural experiment for expanded technician duties. Methods: Data from the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) is used to explore patient safety outcomes in Idaho preadoption and postadoption and as compared with its border states. Data from Pharmacy Demand Reports is used to compare job postings in Idaho and its border state, and National Association of Boards of Pharmacy census data are used to compare growth in the number of pharmacists and technicians in Idaho and its border states over time. Results: For Idaho pharmacists, the average number of disciplinary actions reported against both pharmacists and technicians dropped after implementation of expanded technician duties. Idaho also had a lower rate of discipline for pharmacists and technicians than its border states. Idaho had the third highest job postings for pharmacists and the second highest for technicians among its border states. Idaho also had the largest growth in the number of licensed pharmacists and technicians of the observed states in the study period. Conclusion: Available statewide data from Idaho as compared with its border states suggests that expanded technician duties did not adversely impact patient safety outcomes or the pharmacist job market. Additional states may wish to expand pharmacy technician duties in the years ahead.

Objective: The objective of this study was to describe the safety, efficacy, and potential role in therapy of once in 6 months paliperidone palmitate formulation (PP6M; Invega Hafyera). PP6M is a long-acting injectable antipsychotic recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of schizophrenia. Data Sources: A PubMed literature search was conducted using the following terms: paliperidone palmitate and long-acting antipsychotic injections (January 1, 2017, to November 1, 2022). FDA product labeling was also reviewed for pertinent data. Study Selection and Data Extraction: All relevant English-language articles focused on the efficacy and safety of PP6M were considered for inclusion. Data Synthesis: A multicenter, randomized, active controlled relapse prevention noninferiority study showed that PP6M is comparable to paliperidone palmitate once in 3 months formulation (PP3M) in terms of efficacy and safety in clinically stable schizophrenia patients. Place in Therapy: PP6M is indicated in the treatment of adult patients with schizophrenia, who need treatment over a prolonged period. It improves adherence and decreases the rate of relapse and hospitalizations among patients with schizophrenia. It is useful for patients who may have difficulty accessing health care or would prefer the convenience of less frequent injections. Conclusion: PP6M with its long duration of action and lowered frequency of administration (once every 6 months) expands the therapeutic choices available to patients with schizophrenia. More studies in patients with schizophrenia with PP6M, and perhaps other mental illnesses (eg, schizoaffective disorder), are required to fully elucidate the therapeutic potential of PP6M.

Background: There is burgeoning interest in intravenous insulin for hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis (HTG-AP) as a less invasive alternative to plasmapheresis; however, there are few published descriptions of disease-specific insulin protocols.

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of an insulin infusion-based protocol with nonstandardized medical therapy for HTG-AP.

Methods: This is a retrospective analysis before and after creation of an HTG-AP-specific insulin infusion treatment protocol. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, an initial triglyceride level >1000 mg/dL, and a diagnosis of AP. The primary outcome of the study was time to a triglyceride level ≤1000 mg/dL.

Results: Sixty-seven patients were included in this study (26 pre-protocol and 41 in the HTG-AP insulin protocol group). Baseline characteristics between the groups were similar, with median initial triglyceride levels >3500 mg/dL. There was a trend toward patients treated with the HTG-AP-specific infusion reaching a triglyceride level ≤1000 mg/dL faster (43.3 [24.9-72.1] vs 26.9 [17.7-51.1] hours; P = 0.07). Those treated to ≤500 mg/dL achieved this faster with the disease-specific infusion (49.2 [29.4-67.8] vs 70.9 [36.3-107.2] hours, P = 0.04). Hypoglycemia was numerically lower in the HTG-AP-specific insulin infusion group despite higher insulin infusion rates (7.3% vs 19.2%). No patient in the HTG-AP-specific protocol group required plasmapheresis.

Conclusions: The use of an HTG-AP-specific insulin infusion protocol, compared with antecedent nonstandardized care, resulted in prompter achievement of a triglyceride level ≤500 mg/dL and a strong trend toward faster achievement of ≤1000 mg/dL without an increased risk of hypoglycemia. While intravenous insulin may be considered the initial medical therapy for HTG-AP, further studies are needed to determine the optimal dosing.

Background: Dexamethasone use in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 significantly reduces mortality; however, it commonly results in hyperglycemia. Optimal treatment of dexamethasone-induced hyperglycemia is not well established.

Objective: The study purpose was to assess the difference in blood glucose (BG) control between insulin glargine, neutral protamine hagedorn (NPH) insulin, and insulin glargine plus NPH insulin for dexamethasone-induced hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and COVID-19 infection.

Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in adult inpatients with T2DM and COVID-19 infection who received 6 mg of dexamethasone once daily and insulin during the 5-day study period. The primary outcome was the difference in mean point-of-care (POC) BG levels between study insulins. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, length of stay, and the percent difference between the mean daily inpatient and home basal insulin doses (for patients who were receiving basal insulin prior to admission in the insulin glargine and insulin glargine and NPH insulin groups only).

Results: Ninety-six patients were included in the analysis (67 insulin glargine, 10 NPH insulin, and 19 insulin glargine plus NPH insulin). The difference in mean POC BG level was not different among groups (254 ± 60 mg/dL vs 234 ± 39 mg/dL vs 250 ± 51 mg/dL, respectively; P = 0.548). There were no significant differences in the secondary outcomes.

Conclusions: No difference in the mean POC BG level was observed. Dexamethasone-induced hyperglycemia was poorly controlled in patients with T2DM and COVID-19 infection.

Background: Development of computer-based software, termed electronic glucose management system (eGMS), offers an alternative strategy to manage diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) compared with institution-specific paper protocols by integrating glucose and insulin titration into the electronic medical record. Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of eGMS versus a paper-based DKA protocol in an urban academic medical center. Methods: Single-center, retrospective analysis of patients admitted for DKA. The primary objective of this study was the time to transition from intravenous to subcutaneous insulin after resolution of DKA pre- and post-eGMS implementation. Secondary outcomes included incidence of hypoglycemia while on an insulin infusion, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and total hospital length of stay. Results: Time to DKA resolution was similar in both groups with a median time of 8.6 versus 8.8 hours in the paper-based (n = 133) and eGMS groups (n = 84), respectively (P = 0.43). Hypoglycemia occurred more frequently in the paper-based group compared with eGMS during insulin infusion (14 vs 3 patients, P = 0.06). The median ICU (36.5 vs 41.4 hours; P = 0.05) and hospital length of stay (67.9 vs 77.8 hours; P = 0.05) were shorter in the paper-based group compared with the eGMS group. Conclusion and Relevance: Similar rates of DKA resolution were seen for patients managed with a paper-based protocol compared with eGMS. Patients in the paper-based protocol had a shorter ICU and hospital length of stay; however, eGMS had improved clinically relevant safety outcomes.

Background: Self-monitoring of blood pressure (BP) clinically decreases BP. However, cost can limit access, especially in underserved populations. Objective: This mixed-methods pilot study aims to determine the impact of providing home BP monitors free of charge to patients at a federally qualified health center (FQHC) by quantifying the effect on BP and surveying patients to measure satisfaction and engagement. Methods: One hundred eighty patients with clinically diagnosed hypertension received BP monitors. Patient charts were reviewed to collect demographics and office BP readings 3 months before and after receiving a monitor. A 13-question phone survey was conducted to a sample of patients addressing satisfaction and engagement. Answers were based on a Likert scale and dichotomous yes/no. Results were analyzed with descriptive statistics and paired t tests. Results: The chart review demonstrated a significant mean decrease in systolic BP by 5.44 mm Hg (P < 0.001, -8.03 to -2.84) and a mean decrease in diastolic BP by 2.70 mm Hg (P < 0.001, -4.08 to -1.32) after the intervention. For those included who responded to the survey (13%), there was a significant mean increase in the frequency of checking BP per week by 1.5 Likert points (P < 0.00001, -1.0 to -1.9), and a majority (57.8%) felt slightly or much more active in their health care in addition to other benefits. Conclusion: Providing BP monitors to FQHC patients free of charge may have contributed to a significantly decreased office BP, improved engagement, and satisfaction. This program removed cost barriers and allowed patients to be more active in their health care.

Background: Tertiary drug information resources are utilized frequently by health care providers. While pharmacists are uniquely trained and prepared to interpret the information available on these resources, including the results of drug-drug interaction evaluations, discrepancies between such resources pose a major concern for clinicians with regard to patient safety and medication regimen efficacy. It was postulated that drug-drug interaction evaluations between prescription medications and over-the-counter herbal supplements would be particularly problematic. Objective: The objective of this project was to distinguish the discrepancies between tertiary drug information resources in the setting of drug-drug interactions between tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and herbal supplements. Methods: The following medications and herbal supplements were evaluated on Lexicomp, Micromedex, and Medscape: amitriptyline, nortriptyline, doxepin, imipramine, desipramine, amoxapine, St. John's Wort, valerian root, ginkgo biloba, and ginseng. Results: While all of the tertiary drug information resources identified a significant reaction between each TCA and St. John's Wort due to the risk of serotonin syndrome, several other discrepancies were noted, with regard to both the severity of the interaction indicated and whether or not an interaction was identified. Conclusion: It is imperative that clinicians be aware of potential discrepancies between tertiary drug information resources, including the potential for variation in both the clinical interpretation of its severity and the recognition of an interaction.

Objective: The objective of this case report is to describe utilization of area under the curve (AUC)/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) vancomycin dosing with variable MIC results in a patient with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) purulent pericarditis. Case: A 57-year-old Caucasian male presented with cardiac tamponade and pulmonary emboli. Echocardiogram showed moderate-large pericardial effusion with signs of early tamponade physiology. Pericardiocentesis removed serosanguinous, straw yellow fluid. Blood and pericardial cultures revealed MRSA. Patient was then initiated on vancomycin with an initial AUC of 415. MIC of repeat blood cultures were inconsistent. After 8 days of persistent bacteremia, patient was transitioned to daptomycin and ceftaroline with blood culture clearance within 48 hours. Discussion/Conclusion: Guidelines recommend AUC/MIC vancomycin dosing in patients with MRSA bacteremia. Literature regarding treatment of MRSA purulent pericarditis is limited to case reports. Evidence shows variation in MIC results dependent on analysis methods. Further studies on obtaining accurate MIC values and use of AUC/MIC dosing for MRSA purulent pericarditis are prudent to provide appropriate therapy in these patients as mortality is high.

Background: In select patients with minor ischemic stroke, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin plus clopidogrel is recommended if initiated early and continued for 21 to 90 days. Dual antiplatelet therapy use, in a broader population, has shown to increase the risk of bleeding without an increased antithrombotic benefit. An ongoing area of uncertainty is whether DAPT would benefit the nonminor stroke population when continued for 21 to 90 days.?s.

Objective: To describe the effects of DAPT after a nonminor stroke.

Methods: This single-center, retrospective cohort study included patients initiated on antiplatelet therapy started within 1 week of symptom onset for a nonminor ischemic stroke from January 2013 to January 2020. Patients with any bleeding disorder or National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score <4 were excluded. The primary endpoint was major bleeding at 3 months. Secondary endpoints included recurrent stroke and minor bleeding.

Results: A total of 158 patients met criteria for inclusion. Ninety (57%) received DAPT, and 68 (43%) received single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT). The primary endpoint occurred in 3 patients in the DAPT group and 1 patient in the SAPT group (P = 0.463). Minor bleeding occurred in 1 patient receiving DAPT and 2 patients receiving SAPT (P = 0.402). There were 10 patients in the DAPT group and 5 patients in the SAPT group who experienced recurrent stroke or transient ischemic attack (P = 0.429). Limitations of this study include the retrospective single-center study design.

Conclusion: There was a comparable risk of bleeding and recurrent stroke between DAPT and SAPT in patients admitted with an acute nonminor stroke.

Objective: The purpose of this review was to evaluate the clinical data supporting bromocriptine, propranolol, and baclofen in the pharmacologic management of central fever. Data Sources: A comprehensive literature review was performed between January 2018 and August 2022 using the following keywords: "central fever" NOT "fever" OR "infection" OR "infectious" AND "neurocritical" OR "neurology" AND "treatment" AND "medication" OR "medicine" OR "drug" OR "pharmaceutical." Study Selection and Data Extraction: A total of 6 case reports met specified inclusion criteria, with 2 reporting on each of the evaluated medications. Data Synthesis: Significant heterogeneity exists regarding dosing strategies and duration of treatment with these medications for the management of central fever. Although each medication demonstrated the ability to restore normothermia, the variation in underlying cause of the fever and lack of cross-over evaluation between different medications makes a definitive treatment strategy for any of these agents elusive. Conclusions: The development of a central fever has been associated with poor outcomes in patients who have suffered a critical neurologic injury. Although their exact mechanism for this indication has not been fully elucidated, anecdotal evidence seemingly supports the use of bromocriptine, propranolol, and baclofen.