Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery最新文献

Background: Malplaced implants in orbital reconstruction may lead to serious complications and necessitate re-intervention. The aim of this study was to describe outcomes, complications and scenarios of re-intervention in a historical case series of orbital fractures treated with free-hand orbital wall reconstruction. The main hypothesis was that early re-interventions are mainly because of malplaced implants in the posterior orbit.

Methods: Retrospective review of 90 patients with facial fractures involving the orbit, reconstructed with radiopaque orbital wall implants, from 2011 to 2016. Data were obtained from medical records and computed tomography images. Recorded parameters were fracture type, ocular injury, ocular motility, diplopia, eye position, complications and re-interventions. Secondary reconstructions because of enophthalmos were volumetrically evaluated.

Results: Early complications requiring re-intervention within 1 month were seen in 12 (13%) patients, where all except two were because of malplaced implants. The implant incongruence was without exception found in the posterior orbit. Late complications consisted of four (4%) cases of ectropion and five (5%) cases of entropion that needed corrective surgery. The majority of the patients with eye-lid complications had undergone repeated surgeries. Secondary orbital surgeries were performed in nine (10%) patients. Five of these patients had secondary reconstruction for enophthalmos and associated diplopia. None of these patients became completely free from either enophthalmos or diplopia after the secondary surgery.

Conclusion: Re-intervention after orbital reconstruction is mainly related to malplaced implants in the posterior orbit. Incomplete results in patients requiring secondary surgery for enophthalmos infer the importance of accurate restoration of the orbit at primary surgery. Abstract presented at: Swedish surgery Week 2021 and SCAPLAS 2022.

Objectives: The aim of this study is to make a diagnosis and a classification for congenital central slip hypoplasia. The surgical treatment was determined according to the classification.

Methods: A retrospective study of 25 treated digits in 13 patients with congenital central slip hypoplasia was carried out. The central slip was classified into two types. Type I: The distance between the insertion of central slip and the proximal interphalangeal joint was shorter than or equal to 5 mm. Type II: The distance between the insertion of central slip and the proximal interphalangeal joint was longer than 5 mm. Tendon advancement or tendon graft was used for type I or II, respectively.

Results: The preoperative mean extension lag was 91° (range, 80°-100°), and the mean follow-up duration was 18 months (range, 9-24 months). The postoperative mean extension lag was 19° (range, 0°-50°). No matter whether in type I or II, the postoperative ranges of proximal interphalangeal joint extension had significant improvement compared with the preoperative ones. There was no statistical difference of proximal interphalangeal joint extension lag changes before and after surgery between the two types.

Conclusion: Congenital central slip hypoplasia could be classified into two types. Either tendon advancement or tendon graft might be effective, which depended on the classification.

Tissue expansion can be used to overcome challenges due to tissue deficiency in plastic and reconstructive surgery; however, the long expansion process is often accompanied by numerous complications. This meta-analysis aimed to determine whether endoscopy-assisted expander placement could decrease complications and shorten treatment time. This study followed the principles of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021226116). A literature search was performed in eight databases from their inception dates up to 25 August 2021, to identify clinical studies on endoscopy-assisted and/or open tissue expander placement in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. In seven studies, 194 underwent endoscopy-assisted expander placement, and 565 underwent open expander placement. The overall complication rate in the endoscopy-assisted group was significantly lower than that in the open group (risk difference (RD) -0.28, 95% confidence interval (CI), -0.38, -0.18, p < .001). Subgroup analysis showed significantly lower incidence rates of hematoma, infection and dehiscence in the endoscopy-assisted group. The complication rate in the head/neck was lower with low heterogeneity (RD, -0.18; 95% CI, -0.26 to -0.09, p < .001; I² = 0%). The endoscopy-assisted group had shorter surgery time, hospital stay and time to full expansion (weighted mean difference (WMD), -13.97 min, -16.88 h, -27.54 days; 95% CI, -15.85, -12.08 min, -24.36, -9.40 h, -38.85, -16.24 days; both p < .001, respectively). Endoscopy-assisted expander placement may help lower the risk of complications, especially in the head/neck, and reduce surgery time, hospital stay, and time to full expansion. Abbreviations: CI: confidence interval; CNKI: China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database; CSTJ, China Science and Technology Journal Database; NOS: the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale; PRISMA: preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses; RCT: randomized controlled trial; RoB: the cochrane risk-of-bias; RD: risk difference; WMD: weighted mean difference; SE: standard error; SND: standard normal deviate.

Flexor tendon injuries of the hand have devastating consequences when primary tendon repair fails or left untreated in the first place. Flexor tendon reconstruction is a substantial treatment option to obtain functional digit. In this study, we aimed to compare the functional outcomes and technical feasibility of fingertip-to-palm and fingertip-to-forearm tendon reconstruction methods. Thirty-five patients were divided into two groups according to the proximal attachment site of the free tendon grafts. Group I consisted of 18 patients whose tendon grafts were placed from fingertip-to-palm (zone III). Group II consisted of 17 patients whose tendon grafts were placed from fingertip-to-forearm (zone V). The mean of 39.6 months (range, 6-52 months) of follow-up with complete clinical data were obtained for all the cases. The mean length of the tendon grafts used in group I and group II was 9.7 ± 1.4 cm and 15.9 ± 1.2 cm, respectively. Significantly shorter tendon grafts were needed in group I (p < 0.001). Both mean DASH score and mean Michigan score were significantly improved postoperatively in both groups (p = 0.0001, p = 0.0001), but there was no significant difference between two groups based on postoperative DASH score (p = 0.112) and Michigan score (p = 0.151). No statistically significant difference was observed between two groups in terms of Strickland's scores (p = 0.868). This study demonstrates that comparable results can be obtained with fingertip-to-palm and fingertip-to-forearm staged tendon reconstructions. Fingertip-to-palm tendon reconstruction seems to be more advantageous when multiple flexor tendon injuries aimed to be reconstructed, in which requirement of tendon graft can be fulfilled with less donor site morbidity.Abbreviations: DASH: disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand.

The extended vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (eVRAM) flap has been proposed for reconstruction of large pelviperineal defects where traditional VRAM flap could be insufficient. To compare the dimensions of VRAM and eVRAM flaps an anatomical study was performed. Ten VRAM and ten eVRAM flaps were dissected in ten fresh adult cadavers. Length, width and volume of all the flaps were measured. Length and volume were significantly larger in eVRAM flap compared to VRAM flap (36.55 cm vs. 30.15, p=.005; and 315.5 vs. 244 mL, p=.012, respectively). No differences were observed in flap width. The eVRAM flap could be a better option than traditional VRAM for reconstruction of big pelviperineal defects when bulkier tissue, larger skin paddle and/or longer arch of rotation are needed for reconstruction.

This study aimed to investigate how long it takes for the dorsally displaced distal radial epiphysis to achieve realignment. We retrospectively reviewed 56 patients with dorsally displaced Salter-Harris type II distal radial epiphyseal fractures who were aged ≤15 years at the time of injury. All fractures were treated with closed reduction and immobilised using a sugar tong splint for 6 weeks. We evaluated the change in the displaced epiphysis position (%) until 12 weeks and the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes. We analysed significant differences in demographic factors and epiphyseal displacement according to the required period for epiphyseal realignment. The estimated area of the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was calculated, and cut-off values were suggested to predict the required period for epiphyseal realignment. Sixteen (28.6%) and 42 (75%) patients achieved realignment of the epiphysis within 8 and 12 weeks, respectively. The cut-off values of 13.1 and 22.9% displacement at the 1-week follow-up were the best predictors of epiphyseal realignment within 8 and 12 weeks, respectively. Patients with a residual displacement of up to 51.3% in the sagittal plane at the 1-week follow-up achieved complete realignment of the epiphysis at the 6-month follow-up. From this study, we could predict the timing of epiphyseal realignment, and expect epiphyseal realignment even if re-displacement occurred up to 51.3% at the 1-week follow-up.

Background: There is still no consensus on managing zone II level partial flexor tendon lacerations, and the management of zone II partial flexor tendon injuries is controversial. No reliable large cohort studies or metaanalysis papers on partial flexor tendon laceration management are available in PubMed or Embase.Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Insight, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for primary research articles investigating outcomes of patients with partial flexor tendon injuries. The initial search was limited to human studies that were published from 1970-2021 and indexed as randomized controlled or clinical trials or observational, cross-sectional, or cohort studies. We used statistical package R version 4.1.2 for this meta-analysis.Results: The Standardised mean difference (SMD) of the common effects model was 2.020 (95% CI; 1.583-2.457; P < 0.0001), indicating that the results of conservative treatment without surgical intervention are similar to surgical intervention or better in some articles. The SMD of the random effect model was 7.093 (95% CI; 1.090-13.096; P < 0.0206), indicating the same result. Higgins' I2 value was 97.6%, indicating serious heterogeneity.Conclusions: In this first meta-analysis on flexor zone II conservative treatment, five papers with publication bias were analyzed. It is meaningful to verify the result of conservative treatment statistically. Even though this is a heterogeneous paper, conservative treatment seems to have a lot of benefits for the patient, including offering a fairly solid longterm prognosis with very few complications.

Implant-related breast reconstruction can be divided into subpectoral breast reconstruction (SPBR) and prepectoral breast reconstruction (PPBR) according to the different anatomical planes. The previous stereotype was that PPBR had a high complication rate and was not suitable for clinical use. However, with the emergence of acellular dermal matrix (ADM), the clinical effect of PPBR has been improved. To compare the outcomes difference between SPBR and PPBR, We conducted this meta-analysis. Articles on SPBR versus PPBR were searched in PubMed, Web of Sciences, Embase, and Cochrane databases, strictly following the PRISMA guidelines. According to the set criteria, we included the literature that met the requirements. Extracted data were the incidence of adverse events and the duration of drainage. Results show that SPBR has a higher incidence rate in capsular contracture, animation deformity, infection, hematoma and delayed healing wound than PPBR. There are no significant differences in skin flap necrosis, seroma, implant loss, reoperation and duration of drainage between the two groups. Hence, PPBR is no longer a high complication surgical method and can be used in the clinical practice. However, there are few large sample studies at present, so it is necessary to carry out further studies on PPBR.

The objective is to evaluate the inter-recti distance on ultrasound measurement at different locations in healthy nulliparas. Electronic databases were searched for studies describing the inter-recti distance measured by ultrasound in healthy nulliparas. We excluded studies without descriptions of the measurement position or the condition of the abdominal wall. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the inter-recti distance on ultrasound measurement. Seven eligible studies with 295 healthy nulliparas were included. The location of the inter-recti distance measurement by ultrasound was not uniform. The pooled data divided the measurement locations into three areas. The meta-analytic summary values of the umbilical inter-recti distance of the nulliparas was 8.77 mm (6.56-10.99 mm), the distance at the epigastric area was 7.22 mm (2.76-11.68 mm), and that at the infraumbilical area was 4.09 mm (1.55-6.64 mm). The maximal reported inter-recti distance in healthy nulliparous women is smaller than 10 mm on ultrasound measurement at all locations and the range in the umbilical area is larger than that in the epigastric, infraumbilical areas. The values for the inter-recti distance reported in this systematic review can be used as the reference of feasible and desirable distance of the rectus muscles after rectus fascia plication. The limitation was that the methodological quality of the assessment in most studies was unclear or low.

Loss to follow-up is inevitable in retrospective cohort studies, and patients are lost to follow-up after direct-to-implant reconstruction despite annual follow-up recommendation. We analyzed more than 500 patients to analyze the rate of loss to follow-up to plastic surgery and to investigate the factors affecting it. A retrospective review of patients who underwent direct-to-implant reconstruction between July 2008 and August 2016 was performed. Loss to follow-up to plastic surgery was defined as a difference of $\ge$24 months between the total and plastic surgery follow-up. The rate of loss to follow-up and associated factors including patients' demographics, surgery-related variables, oncological data, and early and late complications were analyzed. Of 631 patients who underwent direct-to-implant reconstruction, 551 patients continued visiting the hospital for breast cancer-related treatment. Of the 527 patients who were eligible for the study, 157 patients (29.8%) were lost to plastic surgery follow-up. Surgery-related variables, early complications, cancer stage, and adjuvant therapies were not significantly different. Younger age was significantly associated with loss to follow-up in univariate analysis. However, logistic regression revealed that a long total follow-up period, distant metastasis, and absence of late elective complications were significant factors contributing to follow-up loss. Late elective complications such as malposition, capsular contracture, and mastectomy flap thinning were more common in the follow-up group (48%) than in the loss to follow-up group (22%). Follow-up loss after direct-to-implant reconstruction was not associated with specific demographic or surgery-related variables, and postoperative courses significantly affected the loss to follow-up.