Sara Mustafa, Hamish Crocket, Timothy Kenealy, Rinki Murphy, Jo Scott-Jones, Leanne Te Karu, Ryan Paul, Lynne Chepulis
Introduction: Management of type 2 diabetes (T2D) occurs predominantly in primary health care in Aotearoa New Zealand. Optimising the delivery of clinical diabetes management by upskilling healthcare professionals can reduce the strain on the healthcare system and improve patient care.
Aim: This study aimed to qualitatively evaluate the importance of an education programme delivered by a non-physician diabetes specialist on nurses' knowledge and confidence of T2D management in primary care.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews with nurses enrolled in the programme for at least 6 months and their nurse leads across two clinics in the Waikato region were conducted to assess their confidence and knowledge in T2D management, as well as the acceptability of the programme. Transcripts were analysed using quantitative content analysis.
Results: Four nurses and two nurse leads were interviewed, lasting between 15 and 60 min. Nurses reported improved knowledge of diabetes medications and interpreting clinical measures. Nurses also felt more confident in their communication skills with patients, advocating for their patients, and improved patient engagement. Further education was needed on administering diabetes medication, knowledge of medical devices such as continuous glucose monitoring, and understanding the pathophysiology of diabetes.
Discussion: Self-efficacy and self-reported skills of nurses in T2D management improved following the diabetes mentoring programme. Further research is needed to assess quantitative clinical measures and whether the programme is effective in improving patient health outcomes.
{"title":"Impact of a clinical diabetes specialist mentoring programme on type 2 diabetes management among nurses in primary care: a qualitative study.","authors":"Sara Mustafa, Hamish Crocket, Timothy Kenealy, Rinki Murphy, Jo Scott-Jones, Leanne Te Karu, Ryan Paul, Lynne Chepulis","doi":"10.1071/HC25025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1071/HC25025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Management of type 2 diabetes (T2D) occurs predominantly in primary health care in Aotearoa New Zealand. Optimising the delivery of clinical diabetes management by upskilling healthcare professionals can reduce the strain on the healthcare system and improve patient care.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to qualitatively evaluate the importance of an education programme delivered by a non-physician diabetes specialist on nurses' knowledge and confidence of T2D management in primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews with nurses enrolled in the programme for at least 6 months and their nurse leads across two clinics in the Waikato region were conducted to assess their confidence and knowledge in T2D management, as well as the acceptability of the programme. Transcripts were analysed using quantitative content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four nurses and two nurse leads were interviewed, lasting between 15 and 60 min. Nurses reported improved knowledge of diabetes medications and interpreting clinical measures. Nurses also felt more confident in their communication skills with patients, advocating for their patients, and improved patient engagement. Further education was needed on administering diabetes medication, knowledge of medical devices such as continuous glucose monitoring, and understanding the pathophysiology of diabetes.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Self-efficacy and self-reported skills of nurses in T2D management improved following the diabetes mentoring programme. Further research is needed to assess quantitative clinical measures and whether the programme is effective in improving patient health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145355271","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Susan Platt, Shelaine Zambas, Deb Spence, Catherine Cook
Introduction: There is a knowledge gap around the experiences of New Zealand (NZ) primary health care (PHC) registered nurses and nurse practitioners when working with children whom they suspect are being abused or neglected.
Aim: This study aimed to explore what PHC nurses experience when building and nurturing family and interdisciplinary relationships amidst a suspicion that a child is being abused or neglected.
Methods: Using contacts and snowballing to recruit participants, 13 PHC nurses working in the Auckland region were interviewed using semi-structured interviews. Gadamerian hermeneutics guided the analysis, with other philosophers drawn on to deepen the analysis.
Results: Relationship building is precarious due to trust issues, tensions around reporting, and complex power relations. Nurses are central to coordinating interprofessional care.
Discussion: Building relationships with families, children, and colleagues is fundamental to child protection. It is only by knowing what building and nurturing relationships is like amidst suspicion of child abuse or neglect that those whom nurses work with can understand what this work is like.
{"title":"Primary health care nurses and their suspicion of child abuse: the importance of relationship-building with families and interdisciplinary networks.","authors":"Susan Platt, Shelaine Zambas, Deb Spence, Catherine Cook","doi":"10.1071/HC25016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1071/HC25016","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is a knowledge gap around the experiences of New Zealand (NZ) primary health care (PHC) registered nurses and nurse practitioners when working with children whom they suspect are being abused or neglected.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to explore what PHC nurses experience when building and nurturing family and interdisciplinary relationships amidst a suspicion that a child is being abused or neglected.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using contacts and snowballing to recruit participants, 13 PHC nurses working in the Auckland region were interviewed using semi-structured interviews. Gadamerian hermeneutics guided the analysis, with other philosophers drawn on to deepen the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Relationship building is precarious due to trust issues, tensions around reporting, and complex power relations. Nurses are central to coordinating interprofessional care.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Building relationships with families, children, and colleagues is fundamental to child protection. It is only by knowing what building and nurturing relationships is like amidst suspicion of child abuse or neglect that those whom nurses work with can understand what this work is like.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145355209","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Corrigendum to: Are patients with type 2 diabetes in the Waikato District provided with adequate education and support in primary care to self-manage their condition? A qualitative study.","authors":"Rebekah Crosswell, Kimberley Norman, Shemana Cassim, Valentina Papa, Rawiri Keenan, Ryan Paul, Lynne Chepulis","doi":"10.1071/HC23141_CO","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1071/HC23141_CO","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145355270","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kylie Vuong, Frances Barraclough, Mina Bakhit, Parker Magin, Catherine Stephen
{"title":"Interprofessional collaboration in general practice.","authors":"Kylie Vuong, Frances Barraclough, Mina Bakhit, Parker Magin, Catherine Stephen","doi":"10.1071/HC24160","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1071/HC24160","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145355228","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Do antidepressants help people with low back pain?","authors":"Vanessa Jordan","doi":"10.1071/HC25046","DOIUrl":"10.1071/HC25046","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":"17 1","pages":"94-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143735895","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction Integrating oral health into primary health care (PHC) is recommended, thereby ensuring comprehensive patient care. Primary care teams are well placed to promote and protect patients' oral health, and frequently see oral health-related complaints, and so need to be sufficiently knowledgeable to manage such presentations. There is limited local evidence to inform acceptable and feasible ways of integrating oral health into PHC in Aotearoa New Zealand. Aim To explore the views of doctors and nurses on the place of oral health, and how to improve its inclusion, in PHC. Methods Focus groups with nurses and doctors from six practices were conducted. Data were analysed thematically. Results Several factors influenced the inclusion of oral health in PHC and management of oral health presentations, at individual, professional and system levels: low oral health knowledge, skill and confidence in managing presentations, and lack of communication with local dental services (individual level); considering oral health as out-of-scope of practice, competing priorities, time constraints and ethical considerations (professional level); and lack of affordable and timely definitive oral health care and referral pathways (systems level). Suggestions to facilitate integration of oral health in PHC included information sessions on oral health, developing relationships with local dental professionals, and health system changes. Discussion Primary care practitioners are open to incorporating oral health into their practice; however, several barriers exist to do so sustainably. For effective integration, a series of individual-, professional- and system-level changes are likely required.
{"title":"Nurses' and general practitioners' perspectives on oral health in primary care: a qualitative study.","authors":"Moira B Smith, Elizabeth Hitchings, Lynn McBain","doi":"10.1071/HC23153","DOIUrl":"10.1071/HC23153","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Integrating oral health into primary health care (PHC) is recommended, thereby ensuring comprehensive patient care. Primary care teams are well placed to promote and protect patients' oral health, and frequently see oral health-related complaints, and so need to be sufficiently knowledgeable to manage such presentations. There is limited local evidence to inform acceptable and feasible ways of integrating oral health into PHC in Aotearoa New Zealand. Aim To explore the views of doctors and nurses on the place of oral health, and how to improve its inclusion, in PHC. Methods Focus groups with nurses and doctors from six practices were conducted. Data were analysed thematically. Results Several factors influenced the inclusion of oral health in PHC and management of oral health presentations, at individual, professional and system levels: low oral health knowledge, skill and confidence in managing presentations, and lack of communication with local dental services (individual level); considering oral health as out-of-scope of practice, competing priorities, time constraints and ethical considerations (professional level); and lack of affordable and timely definitive oral health care and referral pathways (systems level). Suggestions to facilitate integration of oral health in PHC included information sessions on oral health, developing relationships with local dental professionals, and health system changes. Discussion Primary care practitioners are open to incorporating oral health into their practice; however, several barriers exist to do so sustainably. For effective integration, a series of individual-, professional- and system-level changes are likely required.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":"17 1","pages":"10-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143735942","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction Rural Māori experience inequities in heart health outcomes compared to rural non-Māori and urban Māori. Access to health care is a significant contributor to these inequities. There is a wealth of literature that explores Māori access to health care; however, the voice of rural Māori within the literature is limited. Under Te Tiriti o Waitangi (The Treaty of Waitangi), Māori have legislative rights to access, engage, and participate in the health care system equitably. Aim This study aimed to investigate the barriers and facilitators of accessing heart health care for rural Māori. Methods The study was informed by Kaupapa Māori Theory, which centres on Māori worldviews and epistemologies. Rural Māori (n =11) with lived experience of (or who had supported their whānau (family) member with) acute coronary syndrome, heart failure or cardiovascular risk assessment were interviewed, and reflective thematic analysis of the data was undertaken. Results Three overarching themes were generated: rural Māori desires and expectations of heart health care; how the system engages with rural Māori; and knowing what is important to rural Māori when it comes to heart health. Discussion Participants experienced many barriers to accessing quality heart health care, some of which were unique to rural settings. Participants sought heart health care that was close to home, culturally responsive, included a representative Māori workforce, involved their whānau, and valued partnership. System-level action is needed to adequately address inequities in health care access and outcomes in rural Māori and to meet obligations under Te Tiriti o Waitangi.
与农村non-Māori和城市Māori相比,农村Māori在心脏健康结果方面存在不平等。获得卫生保健是造成这些不平等的一个重要因素。有大量文献探讨了Māori获得医疗保健的途径;然而,在文献中,农村Māori的声音是有限的。根据《怀唐伊条约》(The tiriiti o Waitangi Treaty), Māori享有公平获取、参与和参与卫生保健系统的立法权利。目的探讨农村居民获得心脏保健服务的障碍及促进因素Māori。方法采用以Māori世界观和认识论为中心的Kaupapa Māori理论。对农村Māori (n =11)有急性冠状动脉综合征、心力衰竭或心血管风险评估生活经历(或曾支持其whānau(家庭)成员)的患者进行访谈,并对数据进行反思性专题分析。结果产生了三个总体主题:农村Māori心脏保健的愿望和期望;该系统如何与农村联系Māori;并了解对农村Māori来说,心脏健康最重要的是什么。与会者在获得高质量心脏保健方面遇到了许多障碍,其中一些障碍是农村环境所特有的。参与者寻求离家近、对文化有反应、有代表性的Māori工作人员、他们的whānau参与以及重视伙伴关系的心脏保健服务。需要采取系统一级的行动,充分解决农村地区Māori卫生保健机会和结果方面的不平等问题,并履行《怀唐伊提里提条约》规定的义务。
{"title":"Rural Māori experiences of accessing heart health care: a Kaupapa Māori qualitative analysis.","authors":"Taria Tane, Vanessa Selak, Kyle Eggleton, Matire Harwood","doi":"10.1071/HC24111","DOIUrl":"10.1071/HC24111","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Rural Māori experience inequities in heart health outcomes compared to rural non-Māori and urban Māori. Access to health care is a significant contributor to these inequities. There is a wealth of literature that explores Māori access to health care; however, the voice of rural Māori within the literature is limited. Under Te Tiriti o Waitangi (The Treaty of Waitangi), Māori have legislative rights to access, engage, and participate in the health care system equitably. Aim This study aimed to investigate the barriers and facilitators of accessing heart health care for rural Māori. Methods The study was informed by Kaupapa Māori Theory, which centres on Māori worldviews and epistemologies. Rural Māori (n =11) with lived experience of (or who had supported their whānau (family) member with) acute coronary syndrome, heart failure or cardiovascular risk assessment were interviewed, and reflective thematic analysis of the data was undertaken. Results Three overarching themes were generated: rural Māori desires and expectations of heart health care; how the system engages with rural Māori; and knowing what is important to rural Māori when it comes to heart health. Discussion Participants experienced many barriers to accessing quality heart health care, some of which were unique to rural settings. Participants sought heart health care that was close to home, culturally responsive, included a representative Māori workforce, involved their whānau, and valued partnership. System-level action is needed to adequately address inequities in health care access and outcomes in rural Māori and to meet obligations under Te Tiriti o Waitangi.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":"17 1","pages":"53-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143735984","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Guangzhao Guan, Amanda Lim, HuiYee Sim, YeYan Khor, Li Mei
Introduction Interprofessional communication between health care professionals is crucial to deliver quality health outcomes and enhance patients' quality of life. Aim This study aimed to investigate the perspectives and contents of the interprofessional communication between general dental practitioners (GDPs) and general medical practitioners (GPs), and to explore the barriers and strategies that could bridge the gap between these health care professionals from their perspectives. Methods A qualitative study approach was undertaken, with semi-structured interviews conducted with GDPs and GPs from Dunedin and Auckland, New Zealand. Transcripts were analysed using a thematic approach to identify patterns and main themes. Results Three major themes emerged from the interviews with GDPs (n =10) and GPs (n =6): (1) experiences of communication, (2) the content of communication and (3) barriers and suggestions to improve communication. Most GDP and GP participants reported that there was a lack of communication between these two specialties. Complex medical conditions and polypharmacy were the topics perceived as essential for interprofessional communication between GDPs and GPs. The barriers of communication included time constraints, insufficient knowledge of the dental field among most GPs, inadequate understanding of referral among GDPs, and the absence of a common means of communication. Discussion Both GDPs and GPs reported a lack of efficient interprofessional communication. They suggested implementing interprofessional education, integrating health record systems, scheduling regular face-to-face meetings, and developing effective referral guidelines.
{"title":"Interprofessional communication between general dental practitioners and general medical practitioners: a qualitative study.","authors":"Guangzhao Guan, Amanda Lim, HuiYee Sim, YeYan Khor, Li Mei","doi":"10.1071/HC24071","DOIUrl":"10.1071/HC24071","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Interprofessional communication between health care professionals is crucial to deliver quality health outcomes and enhance patients' quality of life. Aim This study aimed to investigate the perspectives and contents of the interprofessional communication between general dental practitioners (GDPs) and general medical practitioners (GPs), and to explore the barriers and strategies that could bridge the gap between these health care professionals from their perspectives. Methods A qualitative study approach was undertaken, with semi-structured interviews conducted with GDPs and GPs from Dunedin and Auckland, New Zealand. Transcripts were analysed using a thematic approach to identify patterns and main themes. Results Three major themes emerged from the interviews with GDPs (n =10) and GPs (n =6): (1) experiences of communication, (2) the content of communication and (3) barriers and suggestions to improve communication. Most GDP and GP participants reported that there was a lack of communication between these two specialties. Complex medical conditions and polypharmacy were the topics perceived as essential for interprofessional communication between GDPs and GPs. The barriers of communication included time constraints, insufficient knowledge of the dental field among most GPs, inadequate understanding of referral among GDPs, and the absence of a common means of communication. Discussion Both GDPs and GPs reported a lack of efficient interprofessional communication. They suggested implementing interprofessional education, integrating health record systems, scheduling regular face-to-face meetings, and developing effective referral guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":"17 1","pages":"30-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143735931","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lynne M Chepulis, Rebekah Crosswell, Suzanne Moorhouse, Helen Morton, Michael Oehley, Ryan Paul, Hamish Crocket
Introduction Type 2 diabetes disproportionately affects Indigenous Māori in New Zealand. The reasons for this are multifactorial but include a history of colonialism, barriers to health care access and a lack of culturally appropriate interactions/relationships with health care providers. There is currently a need to develop models of health care delivery that are tailored to the needs of this population. Aim This pilot study evaluates the use of technology, education and culturally-informed wrap-around care (including medication optimisation) to improve type 2 diabetes biomarkers and self-management in a high-needs, majority Indigenous population. Methods Twenty-three participants with HbA1c >80mmol/L received 2-4weeks of continuous glucose monitor (CGM) wear at baseline and at 3months alongside culturally-informed type 2 diabetes education and clinical care. Clinical biomarkers and psychometric measures were recorded at 0, 3, 6 and 12months and 0 and 3months respectively. Medication changes were recorded throughout the study. Results Mean (± s.d.) HbA1c significantly decreased from 93.4±15.7mmol/mol at baseline to 76.5±14.8mmol/mol at 3months, with reductions maintained at 6 and 12months by approximately three-quarters of participants (all P Discussion CGM informed, culturally-appropriate care has the potential to lead to sustained improvements in glycaemia in high-risk, Indigenous populations managed in primary care.
{"title":"Technology-enhanced, culturally-informed primary care results in sustained improvements in biomarkers for Indigenous patients with type 2 diabetes - a pilot study.","authors":"Lynne M Chepulis, Rebekah Crosswell, Suzanne Moorhouse, Helen Morton, Michael Oehley, Ryan Paul, Hamish Crocket","doi":"10.1071/HC24056","DOIUrl":"10.1071/HC24056","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Type 2 diabetes disproportionately affects Indigenous Māori in New Zealand. The reasons for this are multifactorial but include a history of colonialism, barriers to health care access and a lack of culturally appropriate interactions/relationships with health care providers. There is currently a need to develop models of health care delivery that are tailored to the needs of this population. Aim This pilot study evaluates the use of technology, education and culturally-informed wrap-around care (including medication optimisation) to improve type 2 diabetes biomarkers and self-management in a high-needs, majority Indigenous population. Methods Twenty-three participants with HbA1c >80mmol/L received 2-4weeks of continuous glucose monitor (CGM) wear at baseline and at 3months alongside culturally-informed type 2 diabetes education and clinical care. Clinical biomarkers and psychometric measures were recorded at 0, 3, 6 and 12months and 0 and 3months respectively. Medication changes were recorded throughout the study. Results Mean (± s.d.) HbA1c significantly decreased from 93.4±15.7mmol/mol at baseline to 76.5±14.8mmol/mol at 3months, with reductions maintained at 6 and 12months by approximately three-quarters of participants (all P Discussion CGM informed, culturally-appropriate care has the potential to lead to sustained improvements in glycaemia in high-risk, Indigenous populations managed in primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":"17 1","pages":"83-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143735988","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Scott Davidson, Waldir Rodrigues de Souza, Kyle Eggleton
Introduction Fundus examination by direct ophthalmoscopy is widely used in general practice; however, it offers limited field of view, requires close approximation to the patient, has a steep learning curve and is a difficult skill to master and maintain. Non-mydriatic fundus photography (NMFP) offers an alternative with a wider field of view, ability for image analysis and transmission, and is able to be conducted by allied healthcare staff. Aim This study aimed to compare the use of direct ophthalmoscopy with smart-phone NMFP in a large rural general practice. It also aimed to analyse the number of adequate views and positive findings achieved with each instrument and the impact of NMFP on ophthalmology referral decisions. Methods Patients aged ≥16 years presenting to Dargaville Medical Centre (Dargaville, New Zealand) with visual disturbance, headache, hypertensive urgency (systolic blood pressure (BP) >200 mmHg or diastolic BP >120 mmHg), transient ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke were enrolled prospectively into an observational study of visualisation, diagnosis and management impact for a 1-year period (n = 152, 304 eyes). Direct ophthalmoscopy findings and management plans were documented by the attending general practitioner (GP), and then again following assessment of the NMFP. Results NMFP significantly improved visualisation of the fundal structures with an increase in adequate views achieved of both the optic disc and the retina. Inter-rater agreement between the referring GP and ophthalmologist was good. Discussion The use of NMFP in general practice might result in greater accuracy in diagnosing retina and optic disc disease. Routine transmission of NMFP images to specialist eye clinics as part of the referral might improve management and result in health system efficiencies.
直接眼底检查在全科医学中应用广泛;然而,它提供了有限的视野,需要接近病人,有一个陡峭的学习曲线,是一项难以掌握和维持的技能。非散瞳眼底摄影(NMFP)提供了另一种选择,具有更广阔的视野,图像分析和传输能力,并且能够由联合医疗保健人员进行。目的本研究旨在比较在大型农村全科诊所中直接检眼镜与智能手机NMFP的使用情况。它还旨在分析每个仪器获得的充分意见和积极结果的数量以及NMFP对眼科转诊决定的影响。方法将年龄≥16岁、就诊于新西兰达加维尔医疗中心(Dargaville, New Zealand)、伴有视觉障碍、头痛、高血压急症(收缩压>200 mmHg或舒张压>120 mmHg)、短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)或中风的患者前瞻性地纳入一项为期1年的观察性研究中(n = 152,304只眼)。直接的眼科检查结果和管理计划由主治医生(GP)记录,然后在评估NMFP后再次记录。结果NMFP显著提高了眼底结构的可视性,增加了视盘和视网膜的充分视野。转诊全科医生和眼科医生之间的评价一致。在一般实践中使用NMFP可以提高视网膜和视盘疾病的诊断准确性。作为转诊的一部分,将NMFP图像常规传输到专科眼科诊所可能会改善管理并提高卫生系统效率。
{"title":"Use of a smartphone-based, non-mydriatic fundus camera for patients with red flag ophthalmic presentations in a rural general practice.","authors":"Scott Davidson, Waldir Rodrigues de Souza, Kyle Eggleton","doi":"10.1071/HC24040","DOIUrl":"10.1071/HC24040","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Fundus examination by direct ophthalmoscopy is widely used in general practice; however, it offers limited field of view, requires close approximation to the patient, has a steep learning curve and is a difficult skill to master and maintain. Non-mydriatic fundus photography (NMFP) offers an alternative with a wider field of view, ability for image analysis and transmission, and is able to be conducted by allied healthcare staff. Aim This study aimed to compare the use of direct ophthalmoscopy with smart-phone NMFP in a large rural general practice. It also aimed to analyse the number of adequate views and positive findings achieved with each instrument and the impact of NMFP on ophthalmology referral decisions. Methods Patients aged ≥16 years presenting to Dargaville Medical Centre (Dargaville, New Zealand) with visual disturbance, headache, hypertensive urgency (systolic blood pressure (BP) >200 mmHg or diastolic BP >120 mmHg), transient ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke were enrolled prospectively into an observational study of visualisation, diagnosis and management impact for a 1-year period (n = 152, 304 eyes). Direct ophthalmoscopy findings and management plans were documented by the attending general practitioner (GP), and then again following assessment of the NMFP. Results NMFP significantly improved visualisation of the fundal structures with an increase in adequate views achieved of both the optic disc and the retina. Inter-rater agreement between the referring GP and ophthalmologist was good. Discussion The use of NMFP in general practice might result in greater accuracy in diagnosing retina and optic disc disease. Routine transmission of NMFP images to specialist eye clinics as part of the referral might improve management and result in health system efficiencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":"17 1","pages":"4-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143736010","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}