Pub Date : 2025-12-09DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.11.038
S Dhanya Dedeepya, Vaishali Goel, Nivedita Nikhil Desai
{"title":"Letter Regarding: Effects of Irrigation With Normal Saline on Traumatic Brain Injury Combined With Seawater Immersion in Rats.","authors":"S Dhanya Dedeepya, Vaishali Goel, Nivedita Nikhil Desai","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.11.038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2025.11.038","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145724078","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-09DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.10.051
Mallory N Perez, Maxwell Wilberding, Goeto Dantes, Alison Lehane, Mehul V Raval, Gustave H Falciglia, Nicholas E Burjek, Jane L Holl, Willemijn L A Schäfer
Introduction: The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society published guidelines in 2020 for minimizing physiologic stress in neonatal patients who are undergoing intestinal surgery. This study explores stakeholder perceptions of the acceptability and adoption of a neonatal enhanced recovery protocol as well as barriers and facilitators to implementation.
Methods: We conducted seven semistructured focus groups, purposively selecting diverse stakeholders (N = 36) from six US hospitals. Transcripts were generated and transferred into MAXQDA for coding and analysis. We used a combined inductive and deductive approach to develop codes, followed by thematic analysis.
Results: Implementation of the guidelines was variable, with wide adoption of some components (e.g., breastmilk as preferred nutrition) and limited acceptability of others (e.g., early postoperative enteral feeds). We identified five key barriers/facilitators: (1) the heterogeneity of the neonatal surgical population (e.g., degree of prematurity); (2) competing stakeholder priorities (e.g., caregiver values versus clinician assessment of risks/benefits); (3) aligning care across teams (e.g., clinician-clinician, clinician-caregiver communication); (4) the clarity/specificity of component definitions (e.g., "goal-directed fluid management"); and (5) responsiveness to change (e.g., nursing willingness to learn and trial mucous fistula refeeding).
Conclusions: This study provides a preimplementation assessment of an enhanced recovery protocol for neonatal intestinal surgery, highlighting the specific needs of this vulnerable population and identifying actionable refinements to existing guidelines. Broad, effective implementation will require greater consensus on the target population, alignment with stakeholder priorities, clearer care coordination strategies, refined component definitions, and increased openness to practice change.
{"title":"Barriers and Facilitators to Enhanced Recovery Protocol Implementation for Neonatal Intestinal Surgery.","authors":"Mallory N Perez, Maxwell Wilberding, Goeto Dantes, Alison Lehane, Mehul V Raval, Gustave H Falciglia, Nicholas E Burjek, Jane L Holl, Willemijn L A Schäfer","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.10.051","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2025.10.051","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society published guidelines in 2020 for minimizing physiologic stress in neonatal patients who are undergoing intestinal surgery. This study explores stakeholder perceptions of the acceptability and adoption of a neonatal enhanced recovery protocol as well as barriers and facilitators to implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted seven semistructured focus groups, purposively selecting diverse stakeholders (N = 36) from six US hospitals. Transcripts were generated and transferred into MAXQDA for coding and analysis. We used a combined inductive and deductive approach to develop codes, followed by thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Implementation of the guidelines was variable, with wide adoption of some components (e.g., breastmilk as preferred nutrition) and limited acceptability of others (e.g., early postoperative enteral feeds). We identified five key barriers/facilitators: (1) the heterogeneity of the neonatal surgical population (e.g., degree of prematurity); (2) competing stakeholder priorities (e.g., caregiver values versus clinician assessment of risks/benefits); (3) aligning care across teams (e.g., clinician-clinician, clinician-caregiver communication); (4) the clarity/specificity of component definitions (e.g., \"goal-directed fluid management\"); and (5) responsiveness to change (e.g., nursing willingness to learn and trial mucous fistula refeeding).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides a preimplementation assessment of an enhanced recovery protocol for neonatal intestinal surgery, highlighting the specific needs of this vulnerable population and identifying actionable refinements to existing guidelines. Broad, effective implementation will require greater consensus on the target population, alignment with stakeholder priorities, clearer care coordination strategies, refined component definitions, and increased openness to practice change.</p>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145724086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-09DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.11.034
Muhammad Tipu Sultan MBBS, MS, PhD , Xu Jiaxiang MD , Mina Dadashi BDS , Akbar Saeed Shah MBBS, MS , Li GuangShuai MD, PhD
Introduction
Suturing often receives limited attention in undergraduate medical education. Many students graduate with inadequate proficiency, particularly in handling aesthetically sensitive wounds. In several countries, general practitioners frequently serve as first-line providers for trauma care and wound closure, yet often lack formal training in cosmetic or tension-free techniques. As a result, patients may suffer long-term physical disfigurement and psychological distress due to poorly executed wound repair. Principles emphasized in plastic surgery, including precision, tissue preservation, wound edge approximation, edge eversion, symmetry, and scar minimization, provide an effective framework for teaching high-quality suturing from the undergraduate level.
Methods
This educational intervention enrolled 71 final-year international MBBS and BDS students who had previously received basic suturing instruction but had not been taught the principles of aesthetic wound closure. All participants attended a 3-4 h suturing workshop designed on plastic surgery principles of wound closure. The session included didactic instruction and hands on training using silicone skin models, focusing on layered closure, tension-free repair, edge eversion, and aesthetic alignment. Competency was assessed using a validated seven-domain, 35-point scorecard before and after training. A passing score of ≥28 was determined by expert consensus.
Results
Seventy students completed the full assessment. The mean score increased from 14.8 ± 5.65 to 29.26 ± 3.21 (P < 0.001), with a large effect size (Cohen's d = 2.56). Passing rates improved from 1.4% to 80%, with significant gains across all technical and aesthetic domains.
Conclusions
A single-structured suturing workshop incorporating aesthetic wound closure principles significantly improved both technical and cosmetic competency. Integrating these principles into undergraduate curricula may help raise the standard of wound management and strengthen students’ confidence for future clinical practice.
导读:在本科医学教育中,对缝合术的关注很少。许多学生毕业时并不熟练,特别是在处理审美敏感的伤口方面。在一些国家,全科医生经常作为创伤护理和伤口缝合的第一线提供者,但往往缺乏美容或无张力技术方面的正式培训。因此,由于伤口修复不当,患者可能会遭受长期的身体毁容和心理困扰。整形外科强调的原则,包括精确度、组织保存、伤口边缘近似、边缘外翻、对称性和疤痕最小化,为本科阶段的高质量缝合教学提供了有效的框架。方法:本教育干预纳入71名接受过基本缝合指导但未学习过美观缝合原则的国际MBBS和BDS学生。所有参与者都参加了一个3-4小时的缝合研讨会,该研讨会旨在了解整形外科伤口闭合的原理。会议包括教学指导和使用硅胶皮肤模型的实践培训,重点是分层闭合,无张力修复,边缘外翻和美学对齐。在培训前后使用经过验证的七域35分记分卡评估能力。≥28分为专家一致判定的及格分。结果:70名学生完成了完整的评估。平均评分由14.8±5.65上升至29.26±3.21 (P < 0.001),且效应量较大(Cohen’s d = 2.56)。通过率从1.4%提高到80%,在所有技术和美学领域都有显著的提高。结论:采用美学缝合原则的单一结构缝合车间显著提高了技术和美容能力。将这些原则纳入本科课程有助于提高伤口管理水平,增强学生对未来临床实践的信心。
{"title":"Enhancing Suturing Competency in Undergraduate Medical Students: Impact of Teaching Aesthetic Suturing for International Undergraduate Medical Students","authors":"Muhammad Tipu Sultan MBBS, MS, PhD , Xu Jiaxiang MD , Mina Dadashi BDS , Akbar Saeed Shah MBBS, MS , Li GuangShuai MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.11.034","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.11.034","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Suturing often receives limited attention in undergraduate medical education. Many students graduate with inadequate proficiency, particularly in handling aesthetically sensitive wounds. In several countries, general practitioners frequently serve as first-line providers for trauma care and wound closure, yet often lack formal training in cosmetic or tension-free techniques. As a result, patients may suffer long-term physical disfigurement and psychological distress due to poorly executed wound repair. Principles emphasized in plastic surgery, including precision, tissue preservation, wound edge approximation, edge eversion, symmetry, and scar minimization, provide an effective framework for teaching high-quality suturing from the undergraduate level.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This educational intervention enrolled 71 final-year international MBBS and BDS students who had previously received basic suturing instruction but had not been taught the principles of aesthetic wound closure. All participants attended a 3-4 h suturing workshop designed on plastic surgery principles of wound closure. The session included didactic instruction and hands on training using silicone skin models, focusing on layered closure, tension-free repair, edge eversion, and aesthetic alignment. Competency was assessed using a validated seven-domain, 35-point scorecard before and after training. A passing score of ≥28 was determined by expert consensus.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seventy students completed the full assessment. The mean score increased from 14.8 ± 5.65 to 29.26 ± 3.21 (<em>P</em> < 0.001), with a large effect size (Cohen's d = 2.56). Passing rates improved from 1.4% to 80%, with significant gains across all technical and aesthetic domains.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A single-structured suturing workshop incorporating aesthetic wound closure principles significantly improved both technical and cosmetic competency. Integrating these principles into undergraduate curricula may help raise the standard of wound management and strengthen students’ confidence for future clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"317 ","pages":"Pages 138-146"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145724020","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-08DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.11.005
Alexa G. Turpin MD , Lindsey Asti PhD, MPH , Carley Lutz BS , Jennifer Cooper PhD , Lindsay Gil MD, MPH , Cory N. Criss MD , Katherine J. Deans MD, MHSc , Peter C. Minneci MD, MHSc
Introduction
Pilonidal disease is a common condition affecting adolescents and young adults with high recurrence rates and disease-associated morbidity. Identification of patient-specific factors and treatments associated with decreased disease recurrence can assist providers with treatment selection and patient counseling.
Materials and methods
This is a planned secondary analysis of a single institution, randomized controlled trial which compared laser depilation as an adjunct to standard care versus standard care alone. Inclusion criteria were patients 11 to 21 y of age with a history of at least 1 episode of pilonidal disease, without active disease. Patients were randomized to receive laser depilation in conjunction with standard treatment versus standard treatment alone. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was performed to identify variables independently associated with disease recurrence including laser depilation, patient variables (biologic sex, body mass index, prior episodes of disease, prior surgical treatment, race and ethnicity, health insurance status), and annual family income.
Results
Complete 1-y follow-up data to be included in the multivariable analysis were available for 200 patients in the trial. After adjusting for sex, body mass index, prior episodes of disease, prior surgical treatment, race and ethnicity, type of health insurance, and household income, laser hair treatment was strongly associated with decreased odds of disease recurrence within 1 y (odds ratio [OR], 0.26 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.12-0.58]; P = 0.001). After adjusting for other covariables, there was a significant interaction between laser hair treatment and health insurance type. Laser hair treatment was significantly associated with lower odds of disease recurrence in patients who were privately insured (OR, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.16-0.55], P < 0.001) but was not associated with lower disease recurrence in those who were publicly insured (OR, 1.20 [95% CI, 0.63-2.28], P = 0.58).
Conclusions
Laser depilation is associated with decreased pilonidal disease recurrence. However, there may be heterogeneity of treatment effect based on insurance status with laser depilation decreasing recurrence in patients with private insurance and being less effective in patients with public insurance. This heterogeneity of treatment effect may be related to barriers to care and social determinants of health and warrants further investigation.
{"title":"Identifying Predictors of Recurrent Pilonidal Disease in Adolescents and Young Adults: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Alexa G. Turpin MD , Lindsey Asti PhD, MPH , Carley Lutz BS , Jennifer Cooper PhD , Lindsay Gil MD, MPH , Cory N. Criss MD , Katherine J. Deans MD, MHSc , Peter C. Minneci MD, MHSc","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.11.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.11.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Pilonidal disease is a common condition affecting adolescents and young adults with high recurrence rates and disease-associated morbidity. Identification of patient-specific factors and treatments associated with decreased disease recurrence can assist providers with treatment selection and patient counseling.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>This is a planned secondary analysis of a single institution, randomized controlled trial which compared laser depilation as an adjunct to standard care <em>versus</em> standard care alone. Inclusion criteria were patients 11 to 21 y of age with a history of at least 1 episode of pilonidal disease, without active disease. Patients were randomized to receive laser depilation in conjunction with standard treatment <em>versus</em> standard treatment alone. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was performed to identify variables independently associated with disease recurrence including laser depilation, patient variables (biologic sex, body mass index, prior episodes of disease, prior surgical treatment, race and ethnicity, health insurance status), and annual family income.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Complete 1-y follow-up data to be included in the multivariable analysis were available for 200 patients in the trial. After adjusting for sex, body mass index, prior episodes of disease, prior surgical treatment, race and ethnicity, type of health insurance, and household income, laser hair treatment was strongly associated with decreased odds of disease recurrence within 1 y (odds ratio [OR], 0.26 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.12-0.58]; <em>P</em> = 0.001). After adjusting for other covariables, there was a significant interaction between laser hair treatment and health insurance type. Laser hair treatment was significantly associated with lower odds of disease recurrence in patients who were privately insured (OR, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.16-0.55], <em>P</em> < 0.001) but was not associated with lower disease recurrence in those who were publicly insured (OR, 1.20 [95% CI, 0.63-2.28], <em>P</em> = 0.58).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Laser depilation is associated with decreased pilonidal disease recurrence. However, there may be heterogeneity of treatment effect based on insurance status with laser depilation decreasing recurrence in patients with private insurance and being less effective in patients with public insurance. This heterogeneity of treatment effect may be related to barriers to care and social determinants of health and warrants further investigation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"317 ","pages":"Pages 110-115"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145714907","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-08DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.11.021
Halen Turner MD, Sabrina Morales BS, Alison Hanson RD, Thomas Carver MD
Introduction
Feeding intolerance (FI) after gastrostomy tube (GT) placement is understudied; however, it could have a significant impact on surgical intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The purpose of this study was to quantify the rate of FI after GT placement in patients who previously tolerated enteral nutrition (EN) and compare them to patients without FI after GT.
Methods
A single-center retrospective chart review from 2020 to 2023 analyzed surgical ICU patients who underwent GT placement. Intolerance was defined as cessation of EN due to nausea, vomiting, lack of gas or stool, abdominal distention, or high gastric residuals. Statistical analysis compared characteristics of patients with and without intolerance.
Results
A total of 86 patients underwent GT placement, with 21 (24.4%) developing FI after placement. Patients tolerated feeds for a median of 1 d before requiring cessation, and feeds were restarted via GT after a median of 5 d. The most common reason for cessation was vomiting (42.9%). Among these patients, 52.3% required a change in the route of nutrition delivery, and of these, 23.8% required total parenteral nutrition. Compared to patients who tolerated EN, intolerant patients were younger (57 versus 35, P = 0.03).
Conclusions
FI after GT placement has not been characterized in the literature; however, it occurred in 24.4% of patients who had previously tolerated EN. Awareness of FI is critical to prevent malnutrition, as 52.3% required an alternate route for nutrition.
导言:胃造口管(GT)置入后喂养不耐受(FI)的研究尚不充分;然而,它可能对外科重症监护病房(ICU)患者产生重大影响。本研究的目的是量化先前耐受肠内营养(EN)的患者在GT放置后FI的发生率,并将其与GT后无FI的患者进行比较。方法:单中心回顾性图表回顾,分析了2020年至2023年接受GT放置的外科ICU患者。不耐受被定义为由于恶心、呕吐、缺气或大便、腹胀或胃残留物高而停止EN。统计分析比较了有无不耐受患者的特征。结果:共有86例患者接受了GT放置,其中21例(24.4%)在放置后发生FI。患者在需要停止前耐受喂养的中位数为1天,并在中位数为5天后通过GT重新开始喂养。最常见的停止原因是呕吐(42.9%)。其中,52.3%的患者需要改变营养输送途径,其中,23.8%的患者需要全肠外营养。与耐受EN的患者相比,不耐受的患者更年轻(57 vs 35, P = 0.03)。结论:文献中尚未描述GT放置后的FI;然而,24.4%以前耐受EN的患者发生了这种情况。对营养不良的认识对预防营养不良至关重要,因为52.3%的人需要其他营养途径。
{"title":"Characterizing Gastrostomy Tube Feeding Intolerance in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit","authors":"Halen Turner MD, Sabrina Morales BS, Alison Hanson RD, Thomas Carver MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.11.021","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.11.021","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Feeding intolerance (FI) after gastrostomy tube (GT) placement is understudied; however, it could have a significant impact on surgical intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The purpose of this study was to quantify the rate of FI after GT placement in patients who previously tolerated enteral nutrition (EN) and compare them to patients without FI after GT.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A single-center retrospective chart review from 2020 to 2023 analyzed surgical ICU patients who underwent GT placement. Intolerance was defined as cessation of EN due to nausea, vomiting, lack of gas or stool, abdominal distention, or high gastric residuals. Statistical analysis compared characteristics of patients with and without intolerance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 86 patients underwent GT placement, with 21 (24.4%) developing FI after placement. Patients tolerated feeds for a median of 1 d before requiring cessation, and feeds were restarted via GT after a median of 5 d. The most common reason for cessation was vomiting (42.9%). Among these patients, 52.3% required a change in the route of nutrition delivery, and of these, 23.8% required total parenteral nutrition. Compared to patients who tolerated EN, intolerant patients were younger (57 <em>versus</em> 35, <em>P</em> = 0.03).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>FI after GT placement has not been characterized in the literature; however, it occurred in 24.4% of patients who had previously tolerated EN. Awareness of FI is critical to prevent malnutrition, as 52.3% required an alternate route for nutrition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"317 ","pages":"Pages 132-137"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145714946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-06DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.11.016
Devika Dixit MD , Curtis Warren MPH , Sergio Duarte PhD , Dan Neal MS , Roniel Cabrera MD , Andreas G. Zori MD , Ali Zarrinpar MD, PhD
Introduction
Racial and ethnic disparities in liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma are understudied.
Methods
Patient and tumor characteristics of all LT in the United States from April 2012 to June 2021 were obtained from a nationwide database (UNOS STAR files). Separate analyses were conducted for transplant and waitlist outcomes. Statistical tests were conducted to look for differences among racial/ethnic groups and assess survival outcomes.
Results
Asian patients had the highest graft and patient transplant and waitlist survival rates. Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) recipients had the lowest graft and patient survival rates after transplant at 6 mo, 1 y, and 3 y. Hispanic patients had the lowest waitlist survival. Hispanic patients had the highest Model for End-Stage Liver Disease at listing and the highest proportion of diabetes diagnosis, while NHB had the lowest proportion of private insurance.
Conclusions
NHB patients had poorest posttransplant survival rates and Hispanic patients had worst waitlist survival for LT in hepatocellular carcinoma possibly due to an interplay of socioeconomic and metabolic factors. Addressing these disparities necessitates a comprehensive approach, including areas like healthcare access improvements, lifestyle interventions, and policy development.
{"title":"Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Outcomes in Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma","authors":"Devika Dixit MD , Curtis Warren MPH , Sergio Duarte PhD , Dan Neal MS , Roniel Cabrera MD , Andreas G. Zori MD , Ali Zarrinpar MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.11.016","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.11.016","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Racial and ethnic disparities in liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma are understudied.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patient and tumor characteristics of all LT in the United States from April 2012 to June 2021 were obtained from a nationwide database (UNOS STAR files). Separate analyses were conducted for transplant and waitlist outcomes. Statistical tests were conducted to look for differences among racial/ethnic groups and assess survival outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Asian patients had the highest graft and patient transplant and waitlist survival rates. Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) recipients had the lowest graft and patient survival rates after transplant at 6 mo, 1 y, and 3 y. Hispanic patients had the lowest waitlist survival. Hispanic patients had the highest Model for End-Stage Liver Disease at listing and the highest proportion of diabetes diagnosis, while NHB had the lowest proportion of private insurance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>NHB patients had poorest posttransplant survival rates and Hispanic patients had worst waitlist survival for LT in hepatocellular carcinoma possibly due to an interplay of socioeconomic and metabolic factors. Addressing these disparities necessitates a comprehensive approach, including areas like healthcare access improvements, lifestyle interventions, and policy development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"317 ","pages":"Pages 116-131"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145701018","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-06DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.10.050
Annika Gompers, Jessica L Harding
{"title":"Letter Regarding: \"Racial and Sex Disparities in US Kidney Transplant Clinical Trials: A Comparative Analysis With National Transplant Registry Data\".","authors":"Annika Gompers, Jessica L Harding","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.10.050","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2025.10.050","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145696206","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-06DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.11.019
Christina K. Bedrosian BS , Eric S. Kawaguchi PhD , Li Ding MD , Graeme Rosenberg MD , Takashi Harano MD , Sean Wightman MD , Scott Atay MD , Anthony W. Kim MD , Gavitt A. Woodard MD , Brooks V. Udelsman MD MHS
Introduction
Treatment guidelines for non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) include systemic therapy for tumors >5 cm, even in the absence of metastatic/nodal disease. This study sought to evaluate the utilization rate of systemic therapy and any association with survival in this unique population with large tumors but no evidence of nodal spread.
Methods
Patients with resected NSCLC tumors >5 and ≤7 cm diagnosed between 2010 and 2019 were retrospectively selected from the National Cancer Database. Exclusion factors were metastatic disease, nodal involvement, and ≥R1 resection. Survival was compared between patients who received systemic therapy (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or targeted therapy) and those treated with surgery alone.
Results
Of 8274 identified patients, 3787 (45.8%) received systemic therapy. Recipients tended to be younger (64.6 versus 69.5; P < 0.001), female (45.1% versus 42.1%; P = 0.01), privately insured (37.4% versus 24.4%; P < 0.001), treated at an academic center (39.2% versus 35.7%; P < 0.001), have a Charlson Comorbidity Index of 0 (54.0% versus 50.5%; P < 0.001), and have adenocarcinoma (47.5% versus 40.7%; P < 0.001). Five-year survival was 69.5% with systemic therapy compared to 54.0% with surgery only. Using a multivariable Cox regression, systemic therapy remained associated with a decreased mortality risk (hazard ratio: 0.78, 95% confidence interval: 0.72-0.85; P < 0.001). The primary reason for lack of systemic therapy for 3368 (75.1%) patients was “not planned as part of treatment”, followed by “recommended but refused” by patients/caregivers for 742 patients (16.5%).
Conclusions
Although systemic therapy for locally advanced NSCLC (T3N0M0) is associated with survival, it remains underutilized. Surgeons should be aware of this phenomenon and advocate accordingly.
{"title":"A Lost Opportunity: Underutilization of Systemic Therapy in T3N0M0 Non–small Cell Lung Cancer","authors":"Christina K. Bedrosian BS , Eric S. Kawaguchi PhD , Li Ding MD , Graeme Rosenberg MD , Takashi Harano MD , Sean Wightman MD , Scott Atay MD , Anthony W. Kim MD , Gavitt A. Woodard MD , Brooks V. Udelsman MD MHS","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.11.019","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.11.019","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Treatment guidelines for non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) include systemic therapy for tumors >5 cm, even in the absence of metastatic/nodal disease. This study sought to evaluate the utilization rate of systemic therapy and any association with survival in this unique population with large tumors but no evidence of nodal spread.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with resected NSCLC tumors >5 and ≤7 cm diagnosed between 2010 and 2019 were retrospectively selected from the National Cancer Database. Exclusion factors were metastatic disease, nodal involvement, and ≥R1 resection. Survival was compared between patients who received systemic therapy (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or targeted therapy) and those treated with surgery alone.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 8274 identified patients, 3787 (45.8%) received systemic therapy. Recipients tended to be younger (64.6 <em>versus</em> 69.5; <em>P</em> < 0.001), female (45.1% <em>versus</em> 42.1%; <em>P</em> = 0.01), privately insured (37.4% <em>versus</em> 24.4%; <em>P</em> < 0.001), treated at an academic center (39.2% <em>versus</em> 35.7%; <em>P</em> < 0.001), have a Charlson Comorbidity Index of 0 (54.0% <em>versus</em> 50.5%; <em>P</em> < 0.001), and have adenocarcinoma (47.5% <em>versus</em> 40.7%; <em>P</em> < 0.001). Five-year survival was 69.5% with systemic therapy compared to 54.0% with surgery only. Using a multivariable Cox regression, systemic therapy remained associated with a decreased mortality risk (hazard ratio: 0.78, 95% confidence interval: 0.72-0.85; <em>P</em> < 0.001). The primary reason for lack of systemic therapy for 3368 (75.1%) patients was “not planned as part of treatment”, followed by “recommended but refused” by patients/caregivers for 742 patients (16.5%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Although systemic therapy for locally advanced NSCLC (T3N0M0) is associated with survival, it remains underutilized. Surgeons should be aware of this phenomenon and advocate accordingly.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"317 ","pages":"Pages 99-109"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145701082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-06DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.10.025
Hooman Hadianfard, Mohammad Movahed, Nima Masoudi
{"title":"Letter Regarding: \"Nodal Metastases in Oncocytic Carcinoma of the Thyroid Are Associated With Decreased Survival\".","authors":"Hooman Hadianfard, Mohammad Movahed, Nima Masoudi","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.10.025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2025.10.025","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145701105","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-05DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.11.020
Rodney Ahdoot BS , Alexandra E. Herman MD , Bhuvan Pottepalem BS , Mark P. MacEachern MLIS , Kevin C. Chung MD, MS
Introduction
Surgeons operate in uniquely high-risk environments, facing significant physical and emotional demands and the pressures of academic achievement. These stressors contribute to diminished well-being, affecting both patient care and career longevity. Although burnout is widely studied, it represents only one facet of a surgeon's overall well-being. This study examines existing surgeon well-being interventions for faculty and residents, evaluating structures, themes, and outcome measures to identify gaps in current practices.
Methods
A systematic literature search was conducted across multiple databases to evaluate well-being interventions on surgery faculty and residents. Key components of well-being addressed were identified and categorized into themes within the professional domain, personal domain, and work-life balance.
Results
Sixty-one articles met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 28 studies focused on burnout, 27 on work-related stressors, 9 on career satisfaction, 16 on work-life balance, 16 on physical health, 18 on emotional health, and 2 on relationships. Regarding study design, 13 were randomized controlled trials, 5 were nonrandomized with two groups, 30 used a single-group design with pretest and posttest surveys, and 13 with posttest surveys. To measure outcomes, 37 studies used validated surveys, 34 studies used study-specific surveys, 9 used physiological measurements, and 6 used performance scales.
Conclusions
Surgeon well-being is a multifaceted issue encompassing aspects of professional and personal life. Most interventions have focused on reducing burnout and work-related stressors, measured primarily through surveys. The findings highlight a need for further well-being interventions for both residents and faculty surgeons, particularly focusing on career satisfaction and relationships.
{"title":"Implemented Interventions for Surgeon Well-Being: A Scoping Review","authors":"Rodney Ahdoot BS , Alexandra E. Herman MD , Bhuvan Pottepalem BS , Mark P. MacEachern MLIS , Kevin C. Chung MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.11.020","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.11.020","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Surgeons operate in uniquely high-risk environments, facing significant physical and emotional demands and the pressures of academic achievement. These stressors contribute to diminished well-being, affecting both patient care and career longevity. Although burnout is widely studied, it represents only one facet of a surgeon's overall well-being. This study examines existing surgeon well-being interventions for faculty and residents, evaluating structures, themes, and outcome measures to identify gaps in current practices.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic literature search was conducted across multiple databases to evaluate well-being interventions on surgery faculty and residents. Key components of well-being addressed were identified and categorized into themes within the professional domain, personal domain, and work-life balance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixty-one articles met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 28 studies focused on burnout, 27 on work-related stressors, 9 on career satisfaction, 16 on work-life balance, 16 on physical health, 18 on emotional health, and 2 on relationships. Regarding study design, 13 were randomized controlled trials, 5 were nonrandomized with two groups, 30 used a single-group design with pretest and posttest surveys, and 13 with posttest surveys. To measure outcomes, 37 studies used validated surveys, 34 studies used study-specific surveys, 9 used physiological measurements, and 6 used performance scales.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Surgeon well-being is a multifaceted issue encompassing aspects of professional and personal life. Most interventions have focused on reducing burnout and work-related stressors, measured primarily through surveys. The findings highlight a need for further well-being interventions for both residents and faculty surgeons, particularly focusing on career satisfaction and relationships.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"317 ","pages":"Pages 82-89"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145683524","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}