Journal of the American College of Cardiology最新文献

Background: A primary goal in treating obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) is to improve patients' health status: their symptoms, function, and quality of life. The health status benefits of aficamten, a novel cardiac myosin inhibitor, have not been comprehensively described.

Objectives: This study sought to determine the effect of aficamten on patient-reported health status, including symptoms of fatigue, shortness of breath, chest pain, physical and social limitations, and quality of life.

Methods: SEQUOIA-HCM (Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Aficamten Compared to Placebo in Adults With Symptomatic oHCM) randomized symptomatic adults with oHCM to 24 weeks of aficamten (n = 142) or placebo (n = 140), followed by a 4-week washout. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire 7-item (SAQ7) were serially administered. Changes in mean KCCQ-Overall Summary Score (KCCQ-OSS) and SAQ7-Summary Score (SAQ7-SS) from baseline to 24 weeks and following treatment withdrawal were compared using linear regression adjusted for baseline scores and randomization strata. Proportions of patients with clinically important changes were compared.

Results: Among 282 participants, the mean age was 59 ± 13 years, 115 (41%) were female, and 223 (79%) were White. Baseline KCCQ-OSS (69.3 ± 20.1 vs 67.3 ± 18.8) and SAQ7-SS (72.0 ± 21.0 vs 72.4 ± 18.3) were similar between aficamten and placebo groups. Treatment with aficamten, compared with placebo, improved both the mean KCCQ-OSS (13.3 ± 16.3 vs 6.1 ± 12.6; mean difference: 7.9; 95% CI: 4.8-11.0; P < 0.001) and SAQ7-SS (11.6 ± 17.4 vs 3.8 ± 14.4; mean difference: 7.8; 95% CI: 4.7-11.0; P < 0.001) at 24 weeks, with benefits emerging within 4 weeks. No heterogeneity in treatment effect was found across subgroups. A much larger proportion of participants experienced a very large health status improvement (≥20 points) with aficamten vs placebo (KCCQ-OSS: 29.7% vs 12.4%, number needed to treat: 5.8; SAQ7-SS: 31.2% vs 13.9%, number needed to treat: 5.8). Participants' health status worsened significantly more after withdrawal from aficamten than placebo (KCCQ-OSS: -16.2 ± 19.0 vs -3.0 ± 9.6; P < 0.001; SAQ7-SS: -17.4 ± 21.4 vs -2.5 ± 13.3), further confirming a causal effect of aficamten.

Conclusions: In patients with symptomatic oHCM, treatment with aficamten resulted in markedly improved health status, including significant improvement in chest pain-related health status, than placebo. (Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Aficamten Compared to Placebo in Adults With Symptomatic oHCM [SEQUOIA-HCM]; NCT05186818).

Background: Myocardial fibrosis (MF) forms part of the arrhythmic substrate for ventricular arrhythmias (VAs).

Objectives: This study sought to determine whether total myocardial fibrosis (TF) and gray zone fibrosis (GZF), assessed using cardiovascular magnetic resonance, are better than left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in predicting ventricular arrhythmias in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM).

Methods: Patients with NICM in a derivation cohort (n = 866) and a validation cohort (n = 848) underwent quantification of TF and GZF. The primary composite endpoint was sudden cardiac death or VAs (ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia).

Results: The primary endpoint was met by 52 of 866 (6.0%) patients in the derivation cohort (median follow-up: 7.5 years; Q1-Q3: 5.2-9.3 years). In competing-risks analyses, MF on visual assessment (MF_VA) predicted the primary endpoint (HR: 5.83; 95% CI: 3.15-10.8). Quantified MF measures permitted categorization into 3 risk groups: a TF of >0 g and ≤10 g was associated with an intermediate risk (HR: 4.03; 95% CI: 1.99-8.16), and a TF of >10 g was associated with the highest risk (HR: 9.17; 95% CI: 4.64-18.1) compared to patients with no MF_VA (lowest risk). Similar trends were observed in the validation cohort. Categorization into these 3 risk groups was achievable using TF or GZF in combination or in isolation. In contrast, LVEF of <35% was a poor predictor of the primary endpoint (validation cohort HR: 1.99; 95% CI: 0.99-4.01).

Conclusions: MF_VA is a strong predictor of sudden cardiac death and VAs in NICM. TF and GZF mass added incremental value to MF_VA. In contrast, LVEF was a poor discriminator of arrhythmic risk.

Background: Current guidelines recommend the perioperative continuation of aspirin in patients with coronary drug-eluting stents (DES) undergoing noncardiac surgery. However, supporting evidence is limited.

Objectives: This study aimed to compare continuing aspirin monotherapy vs temporarily holding all antiplatelet therapy before noncardiac surgery in patients with previous DES implantation.

Methods: We randomly assigned patients who had received a DES >1 year previously and were undergoing elective noncardiac surgery either to continue aspirin or to discontinue all antiplatelet agents 5 days before noncardiac surgery. Antiplatelet therapy was recommended to be resumed no later than 48 hours after surgery, unless contraindicated. The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or stroke between 5 days before and 30 days after noncardiac surgery.

Results: A total of 1,010 patients underwent randomization. Among 926 patients in the modified intention-to-treat population (462 patients in aspirin monotherapy group and 464 patients in the no-antiplatelet therapy group), the primary composite outcome occurred in 3 patients (0.6%) in the aspirin monotherapy group and 4 patients (0.9%) in the no antiplatelet group (difference, -0.2 percentage points; 95% CI: -1.3 to 0.9; P > 0.99). There was no stent thrombosis in either group. The incidence of major bleeding did not differ significantly between groups (6.5% vs 5.2%; P = 0.39), whereas minor bleeding was significantly more frequent in the aspirin group (14.9% vs 10.1%; P = 0.027).

Conclusions: Among patients undergoing low-to-intermediate risk noncardiac surgery >1 year after stent implantation primarily with a DES, in the setting of lower-than-expected event rates, we failed to identify a significant difference between perioperative aspirin monotherapy and no antiplatelet therapy with respect to ischemic outcomes or major bleeding. (Perioperative Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Drug-eluting Stent Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery [ASSURE-DES]; NCT02797548).

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) often remains undiagnosed, and it independently raises the risk of ischemic stroke, which is largely reversible by oral anticoagulation. Although randomized trials using longer term screening approaches increase identification of AF, no studies have established that AF screening lowers stroke rates.

Objectives: To address this knowledge gap, the GUARD-AF (Reducing Stroke by Screening for Undiagnosed Atrial Fibrillation in Elderly Individuals) trial screened participants in primary care practices using a 14-day continuous electrocardiographic monitor to determine whether screening for AF coupled with physician/patient decision-making to use oral anticoagulation reduces stroke and provides a net clinical benefit compared with usual care.

Methods: GUARD-AF was a prospective, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial designed to test whether screening for AF in people aged ≥70 years using a 14-day single-lead continuous electrocardiographic patch monitor could identify patients with undiagnosed AF and reduce stroke. Participants were randomized 1:1 to screening or usual care. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were hospitalization due to all-cause stroke and bleeding, respectively. Analyses used the intention-to-treat population.

Results: Enrollment began on December 17, 2019, and involved 149 primary care sites across the United States. The COVID-19 pandemic led to premature termination of enrollment, with 11,905 participants in the intention-to-treat population. Median follow-up was 15.3 months (Q1-Q3: 13.8-17.6 months). Median age was 75 years (Q1-Q3: 72-79 years), and 56.6% were female. The risk of stroke in the screening group was 0.7% vs 0.6% in the usual care group (HR: 1.10; 95% CI: 0.69-1.75). The risk of bleeding was 1.0% in the screening group vs 1.1% in the usual care group (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.60-1.26). Diagnosis of AF was 5% in the screening group and 3.3% in the usual care group, and initiation of oral anticoagulation after randomization was 4.2% and 2.8%, respectively.

Conclusions: In this trial, there was no evidence that screening for AF using a 14-day continuous electrocardiographic monitor in people ≥70 years of age seen in primary care practice reduces stroke hospitalizations. Event rates were low, however, and the trial did not enroll the planned sample size.(Reducing Stroke by Screening for Undiagnosed Atrial Fibrillation in Elderly Individuals [GUARD-AF]; NCT04126486).

Background: Influenza virus may cause severe infection in patients with heart failure. It is known that influenza infection is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure. However, less is known about the excess burden of morbidity and mortality caused by influenza infection in patients with heart failure at a population level.

Objectives: To estimate the excess burden of morbidity and mortality as determined by annual excess number of deaths and hospitalizations associated with influenza infection in patients with heart failure in Denmark.

Methods: We collected nationwide data on weekly number of deaths and hospitalizations among patients with heart failure in Denmark and weekly estimates of influenza circulation as determined by the proportion of positive influenza samples analyzed at all Danish Hospitals. These data were correlated in a time series linear regression model and this model was used to estimate the annual excess number of deaths and hospitalizations attributable to influenza circulation among patients with heart failure in Denmark. The model also included data on weekly mean temperature and restricted cubic spline terms to account for seasonality and trends over time.

Results: Data were available from 2010 to 2018 encompassing 8 influenza seasons with an annual mean of 25180 samples tested for influenza at Danish hospitals. Among an annual mean of 70570 patients with heart failure, our model estimated that influenza activity was associated with an annual excess of 250 all cause deaths (95%CI 144-489) corresponding to 2.6% of all all-cause deaths (95%CI 1.5% - 5.1%) in patients with heart failure. Similarly, influenza activity was associated with an annual excess of 115 cardiovascular deaths (95%CI 62-244) corresponding to 2.9% of all cardiovascular deaths (95%CI 1.5% - 6.1%). Influenza activity was also associated with an annual excess of 251 hospitalizations for pneumonia or influenza (95%CI 107-533) corresponding to 5.0% of all hospitalizations for pneumonia or influenza.

Conclusions: Our results indicate that influenza activity likely causes substantial morbidity and mortality among patients with heart failure. Notably, our study suggests that approximately 2.6% of all deaths and 5.0% of all hospitalizations with influenza or pneumonia may be attributed to influenza in patients with heart failure.