Jacob P. Werner, Matthew A. Perrion, Jehnsen R. Lebsock, Aaron J. Blank
Accurate and precise estimates of fish age are crucial for calculating dynamic rate functions of a fishery that aid in making management decisions. Otoliths are often the preferred structure used when aging fish, as they typically provide accurate and precise age estimations. However, non-lethal alternatives need to be explored for when sacrificing specimens for age and growth data is not desired. Metrics of bias and precision are often compared to assess differences in aging structures, but the influence of reader experience and subjectivity on these metrics has not been well-studied. We assessed bias and precision between whole-viewed sagittal otoliths, scales, dorsal fin spines, and anal fin spines of Largemouth Bass Micropterus nigricans, and compared metrics of bias and precision between experienced and inexperienced readers. Inexperienced readers produced higher coefficient of variation values across nearly all structures compared to experienced readers. However, reader experience had a negligible influence on accuracy, which varied between structures. Our results indicate that incorporating quality control and training protocols into aging analysis could increase precision and decrease bias. Age estimations obtained from sectioned sagittal otoliths were the most precise and are recommended for aging analysis if sacrificing the specimen is acceptable. Age estimate precision from scales was similar to that from anal fin spines, but scales provided better accuracy. Therefore, we recommend the continued use of scales as non-lethal aging structures in Nebraska. It would be prudent for researchers in other regions to assess bias and accuracy limitations of aging structures from local Largemouth Bass fisheries to determine which structure best suits their purposes.
{"title":"Comparison of lethal and non-lethal aging structures for Largemouth Bass and influence of reader experience","authors":"Jacob P. Werner, Matthew A. Perrion, Jehnsen R. Lebsock, Aaron J. Blank","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70119","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.70119","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurate and precise estimates of fish age are crucial for calculating dynamic rate functions of a fishery that aid in making management decisions. Otoliths are often the preferred structure used when aging fish, as they typically provide accurate and precise age estimations. However, non-lethal alternatives need to be explored for when sacrificing specimens for age and growth data is not desired. Metrics of bias and precision are often compared to assess differences in aging structures, but the influence of reader experience and subjectivity on these metrics has not been well-studied. We assessed bias and precision between whole-viewed sagittal otoliths, scales, dorsal fin spines, and anal fin spines of Largemouth Bass <i>Micropterus nigricans</i>, and compared metrics of bias and precision between experienced and inexperienced readers. Inexperienced readers produced higher coefficient of variation values across nearly all structures compared to experienced readers. However, reader experience had a negligible influence on accuracy, which varied between structures. Our results indicate that incorporating quality control and training protocols into aging analysis could increase precision and decrease bias. Age estimations obtained from sectioned sagittal otoliths were the most precise and are recommended for aging analysis if sacrificing the specimen is acceptable. Age estimate precision from scales was similar to that from anal fin spines, but scales provided better accuracy. Therefore, we recommend the continued use of scales as non-lethal aging structures in Nebraska. It would be prudent for researchers in other regions to assess bias and accuracy limitations of aging structures from local Largemouth Bass fisheries to determine which structure best suits their purposes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.70119","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145341759","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alynn M. Martin, Emiliana Isasi-Catalá, Marília Salgado-Caxito, Ana Gallegos, Leonardo Hostos-Olivera, Paulo Colchao-Claux, Steve Smith, L. Fabian Beltran-Saavedra, Catherine Dougnac, Camila Germana, Mariana Montoya, Scott Carver, Paul C. Cross, Christian Walzer
Vicuñas (Vicugna vicugna) and guanacos (Lama guanicoe) are the two species of wild South American camelids whose distributions range from Peru to northern Argentina and southern Peru to southern Argentina, respectively. Listed as critically endangered in the 1960s due to poaching, vicuña numbers had been gradually recovering; however, new concerns about population stability have arisen with recent observations of sarcoptic mange outbreaks in this species. Sarcoptic mange is an infectious skin disease caused by the microscopic burrowing mite, Sarcoptes scabiei, which infects nearly 150 mammalian species globally, including guanaco and vicuña. Wild camelid populations across Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, and Peru have been affected by sarcoptic mange, with the most severe outbreaks resulting in localized extirpation. Population declines have conservation and economic implications, as many local communities harvest vicuña and guanaco fiber for profit. We review the current literature on sarcoptic mange in wild camelids from Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, and Peru to establish a current state of knowledge on spatial prevalence, management, and therapeutics, and identify existing knowledge gaps. Critical next steps include 1) implementation of effective management strategies that limit the transmission of sarcoptic mange, 2) standardization of data collected during community capture (i.e., chaccu) events, 3) assessing the potential role of community captures in mite transmission, and 4) evaluation of treatment options and best practices for implementation. Further, there is a need for capacity building to improve disease diagnostics and surveillance in wild camelids. A multisectoral collaboration between governmental authorities, communities, academic institutions, and national and international organizations focusing on wild South American camelid conservation could contribute to building actions aimed at preventing future outbreaks and mitigating the current burden of sarcoptic mange disease.
{"title":"Challenges and opportunities in mitigating sarcoptic mange in wild South American camelids","authors":"Alynn M. Martin, Emiliana Isasi-Catalá, Marília Salgado-Caxito, Ana Gallegos, Leonardo Hostos-Olivera, Paulo Colchao-Claux, Steve Smith, L. Fabian Beltran-Saavedra, Catherine Dougnac, Camila Germana, Mariana Montoya, Scott Carver, Paul C. Cross, Christian Walzer","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70125","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.70125","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Vicuñas (<i>Vicugna vicugna</i>) and guanacos (<i>Lama guanicoe</i>) are the two species of wild South American camelids whose distributions range from Peru to northern Argentina and southern Peru to southern Argentina, respectively. Listed as critically endangered in the 1960s due to poaching, vicuña numbers had been gradually recovering; however, new concerns about population stability have arisen with recent observations of sarcoptic mange outbreaks in this species. Sarcoptic mange is an infectious skin disease caused by the microscopic burrowing mite, <i>Sarcoptes scabiei</i>, which infects nearly 150 mammalian species globally, including guanaco and vicuña. Wild camelid populations across Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, and Peru have been affected by sarcoptic mange, with the most severe outbreaks resulting in localized extirpation. Population declines have conservation and economic implications, as many local communities harvest vicuña and guanaco fiber for profit. We review the current literature on sarcoptic mange in wild camelids from Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, and Peru to establish a current state of knowledge on spatial prevalence, management, and therapeutics, and identify existing knowledge gaps. Critical next steps include 1) implementation of effective management strategies that limit the transmission of sarcoptic mange, 2) standardization of data collected during community capture (i.e., chaccu) events, 3) assessing the potential role of community captures in mite transmission, and 4) evaluation of treatment options and best practices for implementation. Further, there is a need for capacity building to improve disease diagnostics and surveillance in wild camelids. A multisectoral collaboration between governmental authorities, communities, academic institutions, and national and international organizations focusing on wild South American camelid conservation could contribute to building actions aimed at preventing future outbreaks and mitigating the current burden of sarcoptic mange disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"90 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.70125","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145779577","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Migration Ecology of Birds (2nd edition) By \u0000 Ian Newton, London. London, United Kingdom: Academic Press. 2024. pp. 707. $175.00 (hardback). ISBN: 978-0-12-823751-9","authors":"Bailey Knick","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70133","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.70133","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"90 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145779433","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}