Before implementing nontoxic shot requirements for hunting waterfowl and American coots Fulica americana in the United States in 1991, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service monitored lead poisoning in waterfowl on federal and state wildlife hunting areas during 1983–1986. Federal and state collaborators collected gizzards and livers from 9,029 hunter-killed waterfowl (10 species of dabbling ducks Anatinae, 9 diving ducks Aythyinae, 5 geese Anserinae, and tundra swans Cygnus columbianus) across the four flyways. At the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wildlife Health Center, Madison, Wisconsin, waterfowl gizzards were examined for ingested lead and nontoxic shot and livers were analyzed for lead concentrations. Diving ducks had the greatest frequency (8.7%) of one or more ingested lead shot, followed by dabbling ducks (5.5%) and geese (1.3%). Ingested shot was not found in tundra swans. The frequency of elevated (≥2.0 mg/kg wet weight) liver lead concentrations was also greatest in diving ducks, followed by dabbling ducks and geese. Within each species group, the frequency of elevated liver lead concentrations was greater than ingested lead shot, an indication that lead shot ingestion alone underrepresents lead exposure. Thus, lead in the liver may remain elevated after the erosion and excretion of lead pellets from the gizzard. Our results provide historical baseline data and summarize a nationwide study of lead exposure, using both ingested lead shot and liver lead concentrations, in waterfowl in the United States before the implementation of nontoxic shot regulations in 1991. These data can be compared with previous studies of lead exposure in waterfowl, as well as current and future assessments to evaluate the success of nontoxic shot regulations nationwide and specifically within previously sampled waterfowl management areas.
{"title":"Lead exposure in waterfowl before nontoxic shot requirements: A nationwide study, 1983–1986","authors":"J. Christian Franson, Christine M. Bunck","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70083","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.70083","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Before implementing nontoxic shot requirements for hunting waterfowl and American coots <i>Fulica americana</i> in the United States in 1991, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service monitored lead poisoning in waterfowl on federal and state wildlife hunting areas during 1983–1986. Federal and state collaborators collected gizzards and livers from 9,029 hunter-killed waterfowl (10 species of dabbling ducks <i>Anatinae</i>, 9 diving ducks <i>Aythyinae</i>, 5 geese <i>Anserinae</i>, and tundra swans <i>Cygnus columbianus</i>) across the four flyways. At the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wildlife Health Center, Madison, Wisconsin, waterfowl gizzards were examined for ingested lead and nontoxic shot and livers were analyzed for lead concentrations. Diving ducks had the greatest frequency (8.7%) of one or more ingested lead shot, followed by dabbling ducks (5.5%) and geese (1.3%). Ingested shot was not found in tundra swans. The frequency of elevated (≥2.0 mg/kg wet weight) liver lead concentrations was also greatest in diving ducks, followed by dabbling ducks and geese. Within each species group, the frequency of elevated liver lead concentrations was greater than ingested lead shot, an indication that lead shot ingestion alone underrepresents lead exposure. Thus, lead in the liver may remain elevated after the erosion and excretion of lead pellets from the gizzard. Our results provide historical baseline data and summarize a nationwide study of lead exposure, using both ingested lead shot and liver lead concentrations, in waterfowl in the United States before the implementation of nontoxic shot regulations in 1991. These data can be compared with previous studies of lead exposure in waterfowl, as well as current and future assessments to evaluate the success of nontoxic shot regulations nationwide and specifically within previously sampled waterfowl management areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.70083","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145341690","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pamela R. Garrettson, Nathan L. Zimpfer, Patrick K. Devers, Min T. Huang, J. Bruce Pollard, Lesley A. Howes
American black ducks Anas rubripes (hereafter, black ducks) are an important game species in the eastern United States and Canada that declined between the 1950s and 1990s, resulting in the implementation of restrictive hunting regulations in the United States and Canada. Black duck harvest is managed by the Black Duck International Adaptive Harvest Management (BDAHM) strategy that was developed between Canada and the United States. The strategy requires that the black duck population be maintained at a level that is commensurate with legal mandates, provides for use appropriate for the habitat carrying capacity, and is managed in a manner that maintains equitable access (between Canada and the United States) to the black duck resource. Fulfilling these mandates requires unbiased country-specific harvest probability estimates, which in turn require estimates of band reporting probability, that is, the probability that a hunter who harvests a banded bird will report it to the North American Bird Banding Program (NABBP) through either the United States Bird Banding Lab (BBL) or the Canadian Bird Banding Office (BBO). We conducted a reporting probability study during the 2017–2018, 2018–2019, and 2019–2020 hunting seasons, using reward bands to estimate continental and country-specific band reporting probabilities. The continental (pooled) band reporting probability was 0.80 (95% CI = 0.660–0.945). Band reporting probability was lower in Canada (0.65, 95% CI = 0.487–0.821) than in the United States (1.00, 0.978–1.022) but increased in both countries since they were last estimated in the 2000s. Increased reporting probability and the difference in reporting between the two countries should be accounted for to most effectively meet the objectives of the BDAHM strategy.
美洲黑鸭(Anas rubripes,以下简称黑鸭)是美国东部和加拿大重要的狩猎物种,在20世纪50年代至90年代期间数量下降,导致美国和加拿大实施限制性狩猎法规。黑鸭的收获由加拿大和美国共同制定的黑鸭国际适应性收获管理(BDAHM)战略进行管理。该战略要求将黑鸭的数量维持在与法律规定相称的水平上,规定栖息地承载能力的适当使用,并以保持(加拿大和美国之间)公平获取黑鸭资源的方式进行管理。要完成这些任务,就需要对特定国家的收获概率进行无偏估计,这反过来又需要对带带报告概率进行估计,即猎人捕获带带的鸟类将通过美国鸟类带带实验室(BBL)或加拿大鸟类带带办公室(BBO)向北美鸟类带带计划(NABBP)报告的概率。我们在2017-2018年、2018-2019年和2019-2020年的狩猎季节进行了一项报告概率研究,使用奖励乐队来估计大陆和国家特定乐队的报告概率。大陆(合并)波段报告概率为0.80 (95% CI = 0.660-0.945)。加拿大的波段报告概率(0.65,95% CI = 0.487-0.821)低于美国(1.00,0.978-1.022),但自2000年代最后一次估计以来,这两个国家的波段报告概率都有所增加。为了最有效地实现BDAHM战略的目标,应考虑到报告概率的增加和两国之间报告的差异。
{"title":"Band reporting probabilities of American black ducks in eastern North America 2017–2019","authors":"Pamela R. Garrettson, Nathan L. Zimpfer, Patrick K. Devers, Min T. Huang, J. Bruce Pollard, Lesley A. Howes","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70117","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.70117","url":null,"abstract":"<p>American black ducks <i>Anas rubripes</i> (hereafter, black ducks) are an important game species in the eastern United States and Canada that declined between the 1950s and 1990s, resulting in the implementation of restrictive hunting regulations in the United States and Canada. Black duck harvest is managed by the Black Duck International Adaptive Harvest Management (BDAHM) strategy that was developed between Canada and the United States. The strategy requires that the black duck population be maintained at a level that is commensurate with legal mandates, provides for use appropriate for the habitat carrying capacity, and is managed in a manner that maintains equitable access (between Canada and the United States) to the black duck resource. Fulfilling these mandates requires unbiased country-specific harvest probability estimates, which in turn require estimates of band reporting probability, that is, the probability that a hunter who harvests a banded bird will report it to the North American Bird Banding Program (NABBP) through either the United States Bird Banding Lab (BBL) or the Canadian Bird Banding Office (BBO). We conducted a reporting probability study during the 2017–2018, 2018–2019, and 2019–2020 hunting seasons, using reward bands to estimate continental and country-specific band reporting probabilities. The continental (pooled) band reporting probability was 0.80 (95% CI = 0.660–0.945). Band reporting probability was lower in Canada (0.65, 95% CI = 0.487–0.821) than in the United States (1.00, 0.978–1.022) but increased in both countries since they were last estimated in the 2000s. Increased reporting probability and the difference in reporting between the two countries should be accounted for to most effectively meet the objectives of the BDAHM strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.70117","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145341812","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Charles A. Drost, Patrick M. Kleeman, Charles B. Yackulic, Brian J. Halstead, Gary M. Fellers
We describe the results of long-term population monitoring of the island night lizard Xantusia riversiana on San Nicolas Island, California, following the species' removal from the U.S. Endangered Species list in 2014. Monitoring activities were carried out from October 2014 through November 2023, but we also incorporate data from earlier work dating back to 1993. Because of habitat loss on the western part of the island, the island night lizard is almost entirely confined to the island's eastern half. The species' distribution remains largely the same since studies in the 1990s, though small increases in distribution were noted at the island's west end. Numbers at most long-term monitoring sites appeared to show a slight decrease associated with a multi-year drought, with numbers returning to previous levels by the end of the monitoring period. Models fit to counts of newly recruited lizards suggested a positive association between winter precipitation and abundance; however, we found a simpler model including constant abundance throughout the study to be more parsimonious. Two monitoring sites showed marked decreases in numbers, with one site declining to zero following infestation of the area by non-native Argentine ants Linepithema humile. The island's vegetation and natural communities continue to gradually recover from a century of overgrazing by sheep and the widespread introduction of aggressive non-native plants. Habitat restoration efforts by U.S. Navy natural resources staff on the island may lead to increasing population numbers and genetic connectivity, but persistent threats remain for the island night lizard on San Nicolas Island.
{"title":"Long-term monitoring of island night lizards on San Nicolas Island","authors":"Charles A. Drost, Patrick M. Kleeman, Charles B. Yackulic, Brian J. Halstead, Gary M. Fellers","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70094","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.70094","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We describe the results of long-term population monitoring of the island night lizard <i>Xantusia riversiana</i> on San Nicolas Island, California, following the species' removal from the U.S. Endangered Species list in 2014. Monitoring activities were carried out from October 2014 through November 2023, but we also incorporate data from earlier work dating back to 1993. Because of habitat loss on the western part of the island, the island night lizard is almost entirely confined to the island's eastern half. The species' distribution remains largely the same since studies in the 1990s, though small increases in distribution were noted at the island's west end. Numbers at most long-term monitoring sites appeared to show a slight decrease associated with a multi-year drought, with numbers returning to previous levels by the end of the monitoring period. Models fit to counts of newly recruited lizards suggested a positive association between winter precipitation and abundance; however, we found a simpler model including constant abundance throughout the study to be more parsimonious. Two monitoring sites showed marked decreases in numbers, with one site declining to zero following infestation of the area by non-native Argentine ants <i>Linepithema humile</i>. The island's vegetation and natural communities continue to gradually recover from a century of overgrazing by sheep and the widespread introduction of aggressive non-native plants. Habitat restoration efforts by U.S. Navy natural resources staff on the island may lead to increasing population numbers and genetic connectivity, but persistent threats remain for the island night lizard on San Nicolas Island.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.70094","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145341814","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Plague is a zoonotic vector-borne disease caused by the bacterium Yersinia pestis that impacts humans and wildlife around the world. One of the most well-studied species in North America negatively impacted by plague is the black-tailed prairie dog Cynomys ludovicianus. Black-tailed prairie dogs are colonial, ground-dwelling sciurids that live in territorial family groups called coteries. Previous plague transmission models have assumed that prairie dogs rarely move outside of their coteries and hence have little interaction with individuals outside of their family groups. Consequently, they would not contribute appreciably to intracolonial transmission of plague among coteries. We examined this assumption by attaching global positioning system (GPS) radio-collars to document prairie dog spatial use, their coterie boundaries, and whether they move outside of their coteries. We recovered five out of six collared yearling male prairie dogs in Scotts Bluff National Monument in Nebraska, USA, and estimated their coterie boundaries using 95% minimum convex polygons and kernel density estimation. We found evidence suggesting that all five individuals made exploratory movements outside of their coteries, with two moving >100 m from their estimated boundary. Exploratory movements provide opportunities for direct contact with prairie dogs from other coteries or with their fleas. Our work provides a baseline for future studies of unknown aspects of prairie dog movement ecology that could alter how we model intracolonial plague transmission.
{"title":"Exploratory movements of a territorial sciurid: implications for disease transmission","authors":"Amanda R. Goldberg, Rachel M. Pigg, Jack F. Cully","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70113","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.70113","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Plague is a zoonotic vector-borne disease caused by the bacterium <i>Yersinia pestis</i> that impacts humans and wildlife around the world. One of the most well-studied species in North America negatively impacted by plague is the black-tailed prairie dog <i>Cynomys ludovicianus</i>. Black-tailed prairie dogs are colonial, ground-dwelling sciurids that live in territorial family groups called coteries. Previous plague transmission models have assumed that prairie dogs rarely move outside of their coteries and hence have little interaction with individuals outside of their family groups. Consequently, they would not contribute appreciably to intracolonial transmission of plague among coteries. We examined this assumption by attaching global positioning system (GPS) radio-collars to document prairie dog spatial use, their coterie boundaries, and whether they move outside of their coteries. We recovered five out of six collared yearling male prairie dogs in Scotts Bluff National Monument in Nebraska, USA, and estimated their coterie boundaries using 95% minimum convex polygons and kernel density estimation. We found evidence suggesting that all five individuals made exploratory movements outside of their coteries, with two moving >100 m from their estimated boundary. Exploratory movements provide opportunities for direct contact with prairie dogs from other coteries or with their fleas. Our work provides a baseline for future studies of unknown aspects of prairie dog movement ecology that could alter how we model intracolonial plague transmission.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.70113","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145341813","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Leyna Stemle, Emily Donovan, Max Larreur, Derek Whipkey, Holly Redmond, Nadine Pershyn, Kristine Cotton, Anahit Amiri, Ellen Audia
{"title":"Crossings: How Road Ecology is Shaping the Future of Our Planet By \u0000 Ben Goldfarb, , New York, New York: W.W. Norton & Company. 2023. pp. 370. $30.00 (hardcover). ISBN: 978-1-324-00589-6","authors":"Leyna Stemle, Emily Donovan, Max Larreur, Derek Whipkey, Holly Redmond, Nadine Pershyn, Kristine Cotton, Anahit Amiri, Ellen Audia","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70118","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.70118","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145341863","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}