首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Wildlife Management最新文献

英文 中文
Factors influencing Wisconsin deer hunter participation in voluntary CWD testing 影响威斯康辛猎鹿人参与自愿CWD检测的因素
IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-06 DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.70072
Ben Beardmore, Meghan Henry, Lauren Bradshaw, Robert H. Holsman

Hunter participation in testing harvested white-tailed deer for chronic wasting disease (CWD) is a critical wildlife disease surveillance strategy; however, this strategy has not been evaluated to determine what may promote or discourage hunter participation in testing when involvement is voluntary. We used a binomial logit model to predict the relative influence of harvest location and several psychological constructs on hunters' voluntary participation in testing for CWD in Wisconsin, USA. The presence of CWD in the county of harvest was a significant factor in determining hunter participation in testing. We found hunters' testing behavior was influenced by risk perceptions associated with CWD impacts on the deer population and consumption of venison from areas of the state known to have CWD. Higher risk perceptions associated with CWD impacts to economic values and recreational hunting experiences decreased the likelihood of testing for the disease. Belief in the efficacy of CWD management actions was another significant factor; however, this effect varied with levels of trust in information provided by the managing agency, attention paid to news coverage related to CWD, and risk perceptions associated with economic and recreational impacts. For agencies seeking to increase hunter engagement with CWD management through participation in voluntary testing programs, a key challenge is to demonstrate how testing contributes to effective disease management.

猎人参与采集的白尾鹿慢性消耗性疾病(CWD)检测是一项重要的野生动物疾病监测策略;然而,这一策略尚未被评估,以确定在自愿参与的情况下,什么会促进或阻碍猎人参与检测。我们使用二项逻辑模型来预测收获地点和几种心理结构对美国威斯康星州猎人自愿参与CWD检测的相对影响。在收获县,CWD的存在是决定猎人是否参与检测的一个重要因素。我们发现猎人的检测行为受到与CWD对鹿种群影响和来自已知有CWD地区的鹿肉消费相关的风险认知的影响。与CWD对经济价值和休闲狩猎经历的影响相关的高风险认知降低了对该疾病进行检测的可能性。对CWD管理措施有效性的信心是另一个重要因素;然而,这种影响随着对管理机构提供的信息的信任程度、对与CWD相关的新闻报道的关注程度以及与经济和娱乐影响相关的风险认知而变化。对于寻求通过参与自愿检测项目来增加猎人对CWD管理的参与的机构来说,一个关键的挑战是证明检测如何有助于有效的疾病管理。
{"title":"Factors influencing Wisconsin deer hunter participation in voluntary CWD testing","authors":"Ben Beardmore,&nbsp;Meghan Henry,&nbsp;Lauren Bradshaw,&nbsp;Robert H. Holsman","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70072","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jwmg.70072","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Hunter participation in testing harvested white-tailed deer for chronic wasting disease (CWD) is a critical wildlife disease surveillance strategy; however, this strategy has not been evaluated to determine what may promote or discourage hunter participation in testing when involvement is voluntary. We used a binomial logit model to predict the relative influence of harvest location and several psychological constructs on hunters' voluntary participation in testing for CWD in Wisconsin, USA. The presence of CWD in the county of harvest was a significant factor in determining hunter participation in testing. We found hunters' testing behavior was influenced by risk perceptions associated with CWD impacts on the deer population and consumption of venison from areas of the state known to have CWD. Higher risk perceptions associated with CWD impacts to economic values and recreational hunting experiences decreased the likelihood of testing for the disease. Belief in the efficacy of CWD management actions was another significant factor; however, this effect varied with levels of trust in information provided by the managing agency, attention paid to news coverage related to CWD, and risk perceptions associated with economic and recreational impacts. For agencies seeking to increase hunter engagement with CWD management through participation in voluntary testing programs, a key challenge is to demonstrate how testing contributes to effective disease management.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.70072","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144869272","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The costs of publishing in scientific journals: Where does the money go? 在科学期刊上发表论文的成本:钱都到哪里去了?
IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-06 DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.70073
Allison S. Cox
<p>The Wildlife Society (TWS) has been publishing research on wildlife management and conservation for >85 years and has worked to build a strong reputation for rigorous peer review to publish vetted results that can directly benefit wildlife. Our publications rely on countless hours of uncompensated work from authors, reviewers, and our Editorial Board. This system helps ensure that the evaluative steps of science are not biased by financial gain, but it may also lead authors to wonder where the money from publication charges is spent. In a publishing environment that is seeing an increasing number of predatory or for-profit journals, authors are understandably concerned about who is profiting from publication costs when they choose where to submit their research. For TWS journals, the answer is clear but often not communicated: your society benefits financially from TWS publications.</p><p>For about 200 years following the establishment of society-owned journals, societies largely subsidized publishing costs through wealthy benefactors and elite society members, but by the 1950s scientific journals began to see profits due to an increase in government funding for research and libraries (Fyfe et al. <span>2022</span>). These profits allowed scientific societies to greatly expand programs aimed at furthering their missions, such as continuing education, professional development, and advocacy efforts. Subsequently, most scientific societies today obtain a substantial portion of their program budget from royalties associated with publications (Brainard <span>2019</span>).</p><p>Publications have been a priority for TWS since our original constitution and bylaws in 1938. Our initial objectives were to 1) establish professional solidarity and maintain professional standards, 2) develop wildlife management along sound biological lines, 3) produce publications to effect these ends, and 4) protect the interests of our members. The science published in our journals clearly supports our objectives, and the revenue generated from these publications enables us to fund programs that support and advocate for wildlife professionals.</p><p>In the 2025 fiscal year, 22% of TWS's income was from journal publications, largely stemming from royalties, subscriptions, and publication fees. Part of these proceeds support TWS staff who manage the review, content editing, and production processes for the journals, and the rest goes to other programs such as policy efforts advocating for wildlife professionals and wildlife, leadership programs, and grants that support our membership. The Society owns and maintains control over its journals, and the majority of funds collected come to TWS, but we manage our journal portfolio through contracts with publishing partners that provide essential services in exchange for a portion of our publication income. In an increasingly complicated publishing world, TWS relies on these partners for their expertise in indexing, submission
这包括更积极地追求拨款、赞助和伙伴关系资金,以支持我们的会员,并确保我们的社会和使命的持续力量。通过资助、合作、捐赠、会员、会议、项目费用和出版物等多样化的资金来源,我们可以在不使任何一个来源负担过重的情况下为我们的会员提供最大的利益(https://wildlife.org/fy23-annual-report/).As我们在不断变化的出版环境中导航,我们感谢每一位为我们期刊的成功做出贡献的人。我们期刊的主要目的是为专注于改善野生动物种群的经过严格审查的科学提供一个出口。大多数期刊的出版费用要么支持营利性公司,要么支持像TWS这样的非营利协会,我们非常感谢每一位选择通过向TWS期刊投稿来支持协会的作者。我们也感谢许多审稿人、副编辑和理事会成员,他们提供志愿时间来改进期刊。通过选择将时间花在TWS期刊上,而不是营利公司拥有的期刊上,您为协会的财务可行性做出了贡献;我们非常感谢您将这次捐款给TWS,这样我们就可以继续支持野生动物专业人士。
{"title":"The costs of publishing in scientific journals: Where does the money go?","authors":"Allison S. Cox","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70073","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jwmg.70073","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;The Wildlife Society (TWS) has been publishing research on wildlife management and conservation for &gt;85 years and has worked to build a strong reputation for rigorous peer review to publish vetted results that can directly benefit wildlife. Our publications rely on countless hours of uncompensated work from authors, reviewers, and our Editorial Board. This system helps ensure that the evaluative steps of science are not biased by financial gain, but it may also lead authors to wonder where the money from publication charges is spent. In a publishing environment that is seeing an increasing number of predatory or for-profit journals, authors are understandably concerned about who is profiting from publication costs when they choose where to submit their research. For TWS journals, the answer is clear but often not communicated: your society benefits financially from TWS publications.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For about 200 years following the establishment of society-owned journals, societies largely subsidized publishing costs through wealthy benefactors and elite society members, but by the 1950s scientific journals began to see profits due to an increase in government funding for research and libraries (Fyfe et al. &lt;span&gt;2022&lt;/span&gt;). These profits allowed scientific societies to greatly expand programs aimed at furthering their missions, such as continuing education, professional development, and advocacy efforts. Subsequently, most scientific societies today obtain a substantial portion of their program budget from royalties associated with publications (Brainard &lt;span&gt;2019&lt;/span&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Publications have been a priority for TWS since our original constitution and bylaws in 1938. Our initial objectives were to 1) establish professional solidarity and maintain professional standards, 2) develop wildlife management along sound biological lines, 3) produce publications to effect these ends, and 4) protect the interests of our members. The science published in our journals clearly supports our objectives, and the revenue generated from these publications enables us to fund programs that support and advocate for wildlife professionals.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the 2025 fiscal year, 22% of TWS's income was from journal publications, largely stemming from royalties, subscriptions, and publication fees. Part of these proceeds support TWS staff who manage the review, content editing, and production processes for the journals, and the rest goes to other programs such as policy efforts advocating for wildlife professionals and wildlife, leadership programs, and grants that support our membership. The Society owns and maintains control over its journals, and the majority of funds collected come to TWS, but we manage our journal portfolio through contracts with publishing partners that provide essential services in exchange for a portion of our publication income. In an increasingly complicated publishing world, TWS relies on these partners for their expertise in indexing, submission","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.70073","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144869271","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Tooth and Claw: Top Predators of the World By Robert M. Johnson, Sharon L. Gilman, and Daniel C. Abel, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. 2023. pp. 352. $45.00 (hardback). ISBN: 978-0-691-24028-2 《牙与爪:世界顶级掠食者》,罗伯特·m·约翰逊、莎伦·l·吉尔曼和丹尼尔·c·阿贝尔著,普林斯顿,新泽西州:普林斯顿大学出版社,2023年。352页。45.00美元(精装)。ISBN: 978-0-691-24028-2
IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-04 DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.70074
Tyler J. Brasington
{"title":"Tooth and Claw: Top Predators of the World By \u0000 Robert M. Johnson, \u0000 Sharon L. Gilman, and \u0000 Daniel C. Abel, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. 2023. pp. 352. $45.00 (hardback). ISBN: 978-0-691-24028-2","authors":"Tyler J. Brasington","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70074","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.70074","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145341667","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The wildlife strikes back: determining the secondary strike risk associated with a mammal–aircraft collision 野生动物反击:确定与哺乳动物与飞机碰撞相关的二次攻击风险
IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-30 DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.70071
Samantha Ball, Anthony Caravaggi, Thomas C. Kelly, Gerry Keogh, Fidelma Butler

Wildlife–aircraft collisions are becoming increasingly common and pose a serious threat to the global aviation industry. While wildlife strike mitigation is a well-researched area, often focusing on a specific species or taxonomic group, secondary strike risk with scavenger or predatory species is rarely considered within the literature. Dublin Airport is the largest civil airport in the Republic of Ireland, reporting an average of 23.9 (±12.8 SD) strikes with native Irish hares (Lepus timidus hibernicus) annually. We employed motion-activated camera traps to identify the species attracted to simulated hare-strike events and to record the time to initial carcass detection. We used commercially available rat carcasses as a proxy for hare carcasses to assess the secondary strike risk associated with such events. We recorded 542 detections within 24 hours of carcass deployment from 82 trials. Hooded crows (Corvus cornix) were the most frequently detected species, involved in 86% of interactions. Initial carcass detection took an average of 4 hours and 54 minutes for avian species, with birds spending an average of 5 minutes and 29 seconds with a carcass. In comparison, it took mammal species an average of 9 hours and 32 minutes to detect the carcass in the first instance. Mammals remained with the carcass for an average of 2 minutes and 35 seconds. These data indicate that current clean-up practices at Dublin Airport (i.e., immediate clean-up and closing of the runway to facilitate clean-up operations) are adequate for reducing the likelihood of a secondary strike event.

野生动物与飞机的碰撞正变得越来越普遍,并对全球航空业构成严重威胁。虽然减轻野生动物袭击是一个研究得很好的领域,通常集中在一个特定的物种或分类群上,但文献中很少考虑食腐动物或掠食性物种的二次袭击风险。都柏林机场是爱尔兰共和国最大的民用机场,据报告每年平均发生23.9次(±12.8 SD)爱尔兰本土野兔袭击事件。我们采用动作激活相机陷阱来识别被模拟野兔袭击事件吸引的物种,并记录到最初的尸体发现时间。我们使用市售的老鼠尸体作为野兔尸体的代理来评估与此类事件相关的二次中风风险。在82个试验中,我们在24小时内记录了542例检测。冠鸦(Corvus cornix)是最常被发现的物种,参与了86%的相互作用。对于鸟类来说,最初的尸体检测平均需要4小时54分钟,而鸟类平均花费5分29秒来检测尸体。相比之下,哺乳动物第一次发现尸体平均需要9小时32分钟。哺乳动物在尸体旁停留的时间平均为2分35秒。这些数据表明,都柏林机场目前的清理做法(即立即清理和关闭跑道以方便清理行动)足以减少二次罢工事件的可能性。
{"title":"The wildlife strikes back: determining the secondary strike risk associated with a mammal–aircraft collision","authors":"Samantha Ball,&nbsp;Anthony Caravaggi,&nbsp;Thomas C. Kelly,&nbsp;Gerry Keogh,&nbsp;Fidelma Butler","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70071","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jwmg.70071","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Wildlife–aircraft collisions are becoming increasingly common and pose a serious threat to the global aviation industry. While wildlife strike mitigation is a well-researched area, often focusing on a specific species or taxonomic group, secondary strike risk with scavenger or predatory species is rarely considered within the literature. Dublin Airport is the largest civil airport in the Republic of Ireland, reporting an average of 23.9 (±12.8 SD) strikes with native Irish hares (<i>Lepus timidus hibernicus</i>) annually. We employed motion-activated camera traps to identify the species attracted to simulated hare-strike events and to record the time to initial carcass detection. We used commercially available rat carcasses as a proxy for hare carcasses to assess the secondary strike risk associated with such events. We recorded 542 detections within 24 hours of carcass deployment from 82 trials. Hooded crows (<i>Corvus cornix</i>) were the most frequently detected species, involved in 86% of interactions. Initial carcass detection took an average of 4 hours and 54 minutes for avian species, with birds spending an average of 5 minutes and 29 seconds with a carcass. In comparison, it took mammal species an average of 9 hours and 32 minutes to detect the carcass in the first instance. Mammals remained with the carcass for an average of 2 minutes and 35 seconds. These data indicate that current clean-up practices at Dublin Airport (i.e., immediate clean-up and closing of the runway to facilitate clean-up operations) are adequate for reducing the likelihood of a secondary strike event.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.70071","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144870069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Multiscale habitat selection of an imperiled stream-dwelling turtle 濒危河栖龟的多尺度栖息地选择
IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-27 DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.70070
A. Joseph Jenkins, James C. Godwin, Daniel A. Warner, David A. Steen

Comprehensive knowledge of habitat requirements is vital to the conservation of species. The dynamic environments inhabited by stream-dwelling taxa are particularly complex and challenging to describe. We investigated habitat selection across multiple spatial scales to identify key habitat characteristics of the flattened musk turtle (Sternotherus depressus), which is a federally threatened species that is poorly studied and imperiled by habitat destruction. From 2013 to 2018, we conducted trapping, visual encounter, and habitat surveys while employing radio telemetry and side scan sonar to explore habitat selection at the population, within home range, and microhabitat levels. Study sites comprised relatively small, second- to fourth-order streams in Alabama, USA. Turtles selected bedrock or rock substrates across multiple scales, while snail prey affected selection only at the within-home-range scale. At the within-home-range scale, turtles selected deeper water. Though inconclusive because 95% confidence intervals overlapped 0, relationships trended toward support for larger streams and more bedrock substrate at the population scale. Results demonstrate that spatial hierarchy of habitat use is relevant to management of riverine turtles. By replicating our habitat survey methods in other streams throughout the flattened musk turtle range, data from this study will aid in identifying areas to focus conservation efforts and provide quantifiable goals for restoration projects. Our research identifies the crucial role of rock and bedrock structures, though these habitat features are threatened by anthropogenic sedimentation.

全面了解生境需求对物种保护至关重要。流栖分类群所居住的动态环境特别复杂,难以描述。本文通过多空间尺度的生境选择研究,确定了扁麝龟(Sternotherus depressus)的主要生境特征。扁麝龟是美国联邦濒危物种,研究较少,且栖息地受到破坏。2013年至2018年,我们通过诱捕、视觉接触和栖息地调查,同时利用无线电遥测和侧扫声纳在种群、家庭范围和微栖息地水平上探索栖息地选择。研究地点包括美国阿拉巴马州相对较小的二至四阶流。海龟在多个尺度上选择基岩或岩石基质,而蜗牛猎物仅在家庭范围内影响选择。在家园范围内,海龟选择较深的水域。由于95%的置信区间重叠为0,因此尚无定论,但在种群规模上,这种关系倾向于支持更大的溪流和更多的基岩基质。结果表明,生境利用的空间层次与河流龟的管理有关。通过在其他河流中复制我们的栖息地调查方法,本研究的数据将有助于确定重点保护工作的区域,并为恢复项目提供可量化的目标。我们的研究确定了岩石和基岩结构的关键作用,尽管这些栖息地特征受到人为沉积的威胁。
{"title":"Multiscale habitat selection of an imperiled stream-dwelling turtle","authors":"A. Joseph Jenkins,&nbsp;James C. Godwin,&nbsp;Daniel A. Warner,&nbsp;David A. Steen","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70070","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jwmg.70070","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Comprehensive knowledge of habitat requirements is vital to the conservation of species. The dynamic environments inhabited by stream-dwelling taxa are particularly complex and challenging to describe. We investigated habitat selection across multiple spatial scales to identify key habitat characteristics of the flattened musk turtle (<i>Sternotherus depressus</i>), which is a federally threatened species that is poorly studied and imperiled by habitat destruction. From 2013 to 2018, we conducted trapping, visual encounter, and habitat surveys while employing radio telemetry and side scan sonar to explore habitat selection at the population, within home range, and microhabitat levels. Study sites comprised relatively small, second- to fourth-order streams in Alabama, USA. Turtles selected bedrock or rock substrates across multiple scales, while snail prey affected selection only at the within-home-range scale. At the within-home-range scale, turtles selected deeper water. Though inconclusive because 95% confidence intervals overlapped 0, relationships trended toward support for larger streams and more bedrock substrate at the population scale. Results demonstrate that spatial hierarchy of habitat use is relevant to management of riverine turtles. By replicating our habitat survey methods in other streams throughout the flattened musk turtle range, data from this study will aid in identifying areas to focus conservation efforts and provide quantifiable goals for restoration projects. Our research identifies the crucial role of rock and bedrock structures, though these habitat features are threatened by anthropogenic sedimentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144870058","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Spatial variation in local population dynamics of sika deer, Cervus nippon, through intensified management 强化管理下梅花鹿种群动态的空间变异
IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-22 DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.70069
Mayumi Ueno, Hayato Iijima, Yoshihiro Inatomi, Saya Yamaguchi, Hino Takafumi, Hiroyuki Uno

Population reduction through hunting and nuisance control has been practiced in many parts of the world to prevent an overabundance of ungulates; however, there is limited knowledge regarding the quantitative impact of intensified hunting management and nuisance control on local dynamics within managed populations. This study examined spatial variations in the local dynamics of sika deer (Cervus nippon) along with hunting and nuisance control across 256 mesh units (23 km2/mesh unit) within the Kushiro subprefecture of Hokkaido, Japan, from 1994 to 2020 (27 years). Under enhanced management, the population declined twice but only by about 14% from the previous peak each time. Since 2017, however, the population has remained stable without further decline. Local densities ranged from 1 to 120 deer/km2 within the area, with higher densities producing higher harvest rates (i.e., density-dependent harvesting). Temporal trends in local densities varied across the mesh units: in some mesh units, sika deer at a high density (≥50 deer/km2) consistently decreased by more than half, whereas in others, medium densities (25–50 deer/km2) increased following temporal fluctuations, and low densities (<25 deer/km2) remained stable throughout the same period. Thus, the extent of human-induced population reduction locally differed and was likely larger at high-density mesh units. Consequently, the impact of intensified management at the prefecture scale varies locally. Therefore, allocating management efforts to high-density mesh units is preferable for more efficient population control across the entire area.

在世界上许多地方,通过狩猎和控制滋扰来减少人口,以防止有蹄类动物过多;然而,关于加强狩猎管理和滋扰控制对管理种群内当地动态的数量影响的知识有限。本研究调查了1994年至2020年(27年)日本北海道钏路县256个网格单元(23平方公里/网格单元)梅花鹿(Cervus nippon)本地动态的空间变化以及狩猎和滋扰控制。在加强管理的情况下,种群数量下降了两次,但每次都只比之前的峰值下降了约14%。然而,自2017年以来,大熊猫数量保持稳定,没有进一步下降。该地区的局部密度为1 ~ 120头/km2,密度越高收获率越高(即密度依赖性收获)。不同网格单元的局部密度随时间变化趋势不同:在一些网格单元中,高密度梅花鹿(≥50只/平方公里)持续减少一半以上,而在其他网格单元中,中等密度(25 - 50只/平方公里)在时间波动后增加,低密度(25只/平方公里)在同一时期保持稳定。因此,人类引起的种群减少程度在当地有所不同,在高密度网格单位可能更大。因此,在地级范围内加强管理的影响因地而异。因此,为了更有效地控制整个地区的人口,将管理工作分配给高密度网格单元是可取的。
{"title":"Spatial variation in local population dynamics of sika deer, Cervus nippon, through intensified management","authors":"Mayumi Ueno,&nbsp;Hayato Iijima,&nbsp;Yoshihiro Inatomi,&nbsp;Saya Yamaguchi,&nbsp;Hino Takafumi,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Uno","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70069","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jwmg.70069","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Population reduction through hunting and nuisance control has been practiced in many parts of the world to prevent an overabundance of ungulates; however, there is limited knowledge regarding the quantitative impact of intensified hunting management and nuisance control on local dynamics within managed populations. This study examined spatial variations in the local dynamics of sika deer (<i>Cervus nippon</i>) along with hunting and nuisance control across 256 mesh units (23 km<sup>2</sup>/mesh unit) within the Kushiro subprefecture of Hokkaido, Japan, from 1994 to 2020 (27 years). Under enhanced management, the population declined twice but only by about 14% from the previous peak each time. Since 2017, however, the population has remained stable without further decline. Local densities ranged from 1 to 120 deer/km<sup>2</sup> within the area, with higher densities producing higher harvest rates (i.e., density-dependent harvesting). Temporal trends in local densities varied across the mesh units: in some mesh units, sika deer at a high density (≥50 deer/km<sup>2</sup>) consistently decreased by more than half, whereas in others, medium densities (25–50 deer/km<sup>2</sup>) increased following temporal fluctuations, and low densities (&lt;25 deer/km<sup>2</sup>) remained stable throughout the same period. Thus, the extent of human-induced population reduction locally differed and was likely larger at high-density mesh units. Consequently, the impact of intensified management at the prefecture scale varies locally. Therefore, allocating management efforts to high-density mesh units is preferable for more efficient population control across the entire area.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.70069","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144870045","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Female and male grizzly bears differ in their responses to low-intensity recreation in a protected area 雌性和雄性灰熊对保护区内低强度娱乐活动的反应不同
IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-22 DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.70068
Elise A. Loggers, Andrea R. Litt, Mark A. Haroldson, Kerry A. Gunther, Frank T. van Manen

Strategies animals use to navigate human-dominated landscapes frequently mimic anti-predator responses employed by prey species. Understanding how large carnivores respond to outdoor recreation is important for conservation, particularly in protected areas with preservation mandates. Visitation to Yellowstone National Park doubled from 1980 to 2015, increasing the need to examine potential changes in behavior of grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) in relation to human recreation sites (trails, backcountry campsites). We developed integrated step-selection functions to explore how recreation sites influenced the movement rate and selection by male and female grizzly bears. Further, we tested whether time of day (diurnal, crepuscular, nocturnal) and restrictions to human access (i.e., restricted, unrestricted) modified bear responses and then compared behaviors based on proximity to recreation sites. Male grizzly bears used trails to travel during crepuscular and nocturnal hours and exhibited more pronounced behavior in restricted areas compared with unrestricted areas, suggesting recreation in unrestricted areas influenced the behavior of male bears. In contrast, female bears varied their movement rate and selection of trails in restricted areas much more than in unrestricted areas, suggesting females may make security tradeoffs between male bears and people. Both sexes used trails, likely as energetically efficient travel corridors; however, our analyses did not indicate that bears spent time near backcountry campsites. The sex-based differences in selection and movement patterns associated with trails and campsites suggest a single management approach for recreation may not equally benefit all bears. Recreation impacts on wildlife are complex to characterize and predict, but simultaneously modeling movement and selection provides a more comprehensive assessment of strategies animals use to navigate perceived risk.

动物在人类主导的环境中导航的策略经常模仿被捕食动物的反捕食反应。了解大型食肉动物对户外娱乐活动的反应对保护很重要,特别是在有保护任务的保护区。从1980年到2015年,黄石国家公园的游客数量翻了一番,这增加了研究灰熊(Ursus arctos)与人类娱乐场所(小径、野外露营地)之间潜在行为变化的需求。我们开发了综合的步进选择函数,以探讨娱乐场所如何影响雄性和雌性灰熊的移动速度和选择。此外,我们测试了一天中的时间(白天、黄昏、夜间)和人类进入的限制(即限制、不限制)是否会改变熊的反应,然后根据靠近娱乐场所的程度比较熊的行为。雄性灰熊在黄昏和夜间使用小径旅行,在限制区域比在非限制区域表现出更明显的行为,这表明在非限制区域的娱乐活动影响了雄性灰熊的行为。相比之下,雌性熊在限制区域的移动速度和路径选择的变化要比在不受限制的区域大得多,这表明雌性熊可能会在雄性熊和人类之间进行安全权衡。两性都使用小径,可能是能量效率高的旅行走廊;然而,我们的分析并没有表明熊会在野外营地附近呆上一段时间。与小径和营地相关的选择和运动模式的性别差异表明,单一的娱乐管理方法可能不会对所有熊都有利。娱乐活动对野生动物的影响是复杂的,难以描述和预测,但同时建模运动和选择提供了一个更全面的评估动物使用的策略来应对感知风险。
{"title":"Female and male grizzly bears differ in their responses to low-intensity recreation in a protected area","authors":"Elise A. Loggers,&nbsp;Andrea R. Litt,&nbsp;Mark A. Haroldson,&nbsp;Kerry A. Gunther,&nbsp;Frank T. van Manen","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70068","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jwmg.70068","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Strategies animals use to navigate human-dominated landscapes frequently mimic anti-predator responses employed by prey species. Understanding how large carnivores respond to outdoor recreation is important for conservation, particularly in protected areas with preservation mandates. Visitation to Yellowstone National Park doubled from 1980 to 2015, increasing the need to examine potential changes in behavior of grizzly bears (<i>Ursus arctos</i>) in relation to human recreation sites (trails, backcountry campsites). We developed integrated step-selection functions to explore how recreation sites influenced the movement rate and selection by male and female grizzly bears. Further, we tested whether time of day (diurnal, crepuscular, nocturnal) and restrictions to human access (i.e., restricted, unrestricted) modified bear responses and then compared behaviors based on proximity to recreation sites. Male grizzly bears used trails to travel during crepuscular and nocturnal hours and exhibited more pronounced behavior in restricted areas compared with unrestricted areas, suggesting recreation in unrestricted areas influenced the behavior of male bears. In contrast, female bears varied their movement rate and selection of trails in restricted areas much more than in unrestricted areas, suggesting females may make security tradeoffs between male bears and people. Both sexes used trails, likely as energetically efficient travel corridors; however, our analyses did not indicate that bears spent time near backcountry campsites. The sex-based differences in selection and movement patterns associated with trails and campsites suggest a single management approach for recreation may not equally benefit all bears. Recreation impacts on wildlife are complex to characterize and predict, but simultaneously modeling movement and selection provides a more comprehensive assessment of strategies animals use to navigate perceived risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.70068","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144870046","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Using integrated step-selection analyses to map high-risk electrocution areas for a highly mobile species 利用综合阶梯选择分析绘制高流动性物种的高危触电区
IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-21 DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.70061
Caroline D. Cappello, Kenneth V. Jacobson, James T. Driscoll, Kyle M. McCarty, Javan M. Bauder

Knowledge of animal-movement patterns is a crucial component in identifying areas with high potential for human–wildlife conflict and in prioritizing associated management actions. Electrical energy infrastructure is a major source of mortality for animals worldwide, with millions of birds colliding with or being electrocuted by power lines and power-pole infrastructure each year. Movement, habitat use, and the spatial distribution of electrocution risk can vary with age, but studies of younger age classes are often hampered because these groups are difficult to observe and lack well-defined home ranges. To identify movement patterns and high-use areas of bald eagles in Arizona, USA, we analyzed global positioning system (GPS) telemetry data collected from 13 immature bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) across Arizona between 2017 and 2023. We built multi-scale, integrated step-selection functions that evaluated eagle responses to a suite of environmental covariates. We then used these models to simulate eagle movement and predict habitat use within and surrounding Maricopa County, which contains both the Phoenix Metropolitan Area and the plurality of bald eagle breeding areas in Arizona. We provide a use case for how these simulated movements could be used by resource managers to identify high-risk areas for electrocution. Eagles avoided urban areas and selected steeper slopes, more pronounced ridges, and areas with greater water and wetland land cover. Predicted habitat use by bald eagles was greatest near waterbodies and along ridges and steep slopes, and indicated where power infrastructure may pose greater electrocution risk. We show how integrated step-selection analyses and movement path simulation may be used for subadult animals lacking stable home ranges to predict high-use areas and identify locations with greater potential for negative human–wildlife interactions.

了解动物运动模式是确定人类与野生动物冲突高可能性地区和确定相关管理行动优先次序的关键组成部分。电力基础设施是全世界动物死亡的主要来源,每年有数百万只鸟与电线和电线杆基础设施相撞或触电。运动、栖息地使用和触电风险的空间分布可能随年龄而变化,但对较年轻年龄组的研究往往受到阻碍,因为这些群体难以观察,而且缺乏明确的活动范围。为了确定美国亚利桑那州秃鹰的活动模式和高使用区域,我们分析了2017年至2023年在亚利桑那州收集的13只未成熟秃鹰(halaeetus leucocephalus)的全球定位系统(GPS)遥测数据。我们建立了多尺度、集成的阶梯选择函数来评估鹰对一系列环境协变量的反应。然后,我们使用这些模型来模拟鹰的运动,并预测马里科帕县及其周围的栖息地使用情况,马里科帕县包括凤凰城大都市区和亚利桑那州的多个白头鹰繁殖区。我们提供了一个用例,说明资源管理人员如何使用这些模拟运动来识别电刑的高风险区域。老鹰避开城市地区,选择更陡峭的斜坡,更明显的山脊,以及有更多水和湿地覆盖的地区。预测秃鹰的栖息地在水体附近、山脊和陡坡附近最大,并指出电力基础设施可能造成更大的触电风险。我们展示了如何将综合阶梯选择分析和运动路径模拟用于缺乏稳定家园范围的亚成年动物,以预测高利用区域并确定具有更大潜在负面人类与野生动物相互作用的位置。
{"title":"Using integrated step-selection analyses to map high-risk electrocution areas for a highly mobile species","authors":"Caroline D. Cappello,&nbsp;Kenneth V. Jacobson,&nbsp;James T. Driscoll,&nbsp;Kyle M. McCarty,&nbsp;Javan M. Bauder","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70061","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jwmg.70061","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Knowledge of animal-movement patterns is a crucial component in identifying areas with high potential for human–wildlife conflict and in prioritizing associated management actions. Electrical energy infrastructure is a major source of mortality for animals worldwide, with millions of birds colliding with or being electrocuted by power lines and power-pole infrastructure each year. Movement, habitat use, and the spatial distribution of electrocution risk can vary with age, but studies of younger age classes are often hampered because these groups are difficult to observe and lack well-defined home ranges. To identify movement patterns and high-use areas of bald eagles in Arizona, USA, we analyzed global positioning system (GPS) telemetry data collected from 13 immature bald eagles (<i>Haliaeetus leucocephalus</i>) across Arizona between 2017 and 2023. We built multi-scale, integrated step-selection functions that evaluated eagle responses to a suite of environmental covariates. We then used these models to simulate eagle movement and predict habitat use within and surrounding Maricopa County, which contains both the Phoenix Metropolitan Area and the plurality of bald eagle breeding areas in Arizona. We provide a use case for how these simulated movements could be used by resource managers to identify high-risk areas for electrocution. Eagles avoided urban areas and selected steeper slopes, more pronounced ridges, and areas with greater water and wetland land cover. Predicted habitat use by bald eagles was greatest near waterbodies and along ridges and steep slopes, and indicated where power infrastructure may pose greater electrocution risk. We show how integrated step-selection analyses and movement path simulation may be used for subadult animals lacking stable home ranges to predict high-use areas and identify locations with greater potential for negative human–wildlife interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144870068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Vulnerable caribou and moose populations display varying responses to mountain pine beetle outbreaks and management 脆弱的北美驯鹿和驼鹿种群对山松甲虫的爆发和管理表现出不同的反应
IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-14 DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.70065
Laura L. Griffin, Laura Finnegan, Julie Duval, Simone Ciuti, Virginia Morera-Pujol, Haitao Li, A. Cole Burton

Rising global temperatures and changing landscape conditions have led to widespread mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) outbreaks in western North America. Pine beetle management is typically implemented to mitigate economic losses, but its effects on wildlife, particularly ecologically important species like caribou (Rangifer tarandus) and moose (Alces alces), warrant greater attention. We assessed the effects of early-stage pine beetle infestation, timber harvest, and fire on habitat selection by caribou (boreal and central mountain designatable units) and moose in west-central Alberta, Canada. Using global positioning system (GPS) collar data collected 3–5 years after infestation, we developed resource selection functions and functional response models. Caribou exhibited seasonally variable responses, generally avoiding pine beetle-affected areas in winter but selecting them in summer. They also avoided harvested and burned areas, though this avoidance depended on overall disturbance levels within their ranges. Moose displayed sex-specific responses to pine beetle infestations and associated management: females avoided pine beetle-affected areas but selected burned sites year-round, while males showed the opposite pattern. These findings suggest that pine beetle disturbances may negatively affect caribou and female moose winter habitat availability while simultaneously enhancing conditions for male moose. Further research is needed to disentangle the individual and cumulative effects of pine beetle management actions versus general timber harvests and wildfires, as these disturbances may be compounding rather than acting in isolation.

全球气温上升和景观条件变化导致北美西部大范围爆发山松甲虫。松甲虫管理通常是为了减轻经济损失,但它对野生动物的影响,特别是对生态上重要的物种,如北美驯鹿(Rangifer tarandus)和驼鹿(Alces Alces)的影响,值得更多的关注。研究了加拿大阿尔伯塔中西部地区早期松甲虫侵染、木材采伐和火灾对北美驯鹿(北部和中部山地可指定单位)和驼鹿栖息地选择的影响。利用侵染后3-5年的全球定位系统(GPS)项圈数据,构建资源选择函数和功能响应模型。驯鹿表现出不同季节的反应,一般在冬季避开松甲虫疫区,而在夏季选择松甲虫疫区。它们也会避开收获和烧毁的地区,尽管这种避开取决于它们活动范围内的总体干扰程度。驼鹿对松甲虫的侵扰和相关的管理表现出性别特异性的反应:雌性避开松甲虫影响的地区,但全年都选择烧伤的地方,而雄性则表现出相反的模式。这些发现表明,松甲虫的干扰可能会对北美驯鹿和雌性驼鹿的冬季栖息地产生负面影响,同时也会提高雄性驼鹿的生存条件。需要进一步的研究来解开松甲虫管理行动与一般木材采伐和野火的个体和累积影响,因为这些干扰可能是复合的,而不是孤立的。
{"title":"Vulnerable caribou and moose populations display varying responses to mountain pine beetle outbreaks and management","authors":"Laura L. Griffin,&nbsp;Laura Finnegan,&nbsp;Julie Duval,&nbsp;Simone Ciuti,&nbsp;Virginia Morera-Pujol,&nbsp;Haitao Li,&nbsp;A. Cole Burton","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70065","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jwmg.70065","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rising global temperatures and changing landscape conditions have led to widespread mountain pine beetle (<i>Dendroctonus ponderosae</i>) outbreaks in western North America. Pine beetle management is typically implemented to mitigate economic losses, but its effects on wildlife, particularly ecologically important species like caribou (<i>Rangifer tarandus</i>) and moose (<i>Alces alces</i>), warrant greater attention. We assessed the effects of early-stage pine beetle infestation, timber harvest, and fire on habitat selection by caribou (boreal and central mountain designatable units) and moose in west-central Alberta, Canada. Using global positioning system (GPS) collar data collected 3–5 years after infestation, we developed resource selection functions and functional response models. Caribou exhibited seasonally variable responses, generally avoiding pine beetle-affected areas in winter but selecting them in summer. They also avoided harvested and burned areas, though this avoidance depended on overall disturbance levels within their ranges. Moose displayed sex-specific responses to pine beetle infestations and associated management: females avoided pine beetle-affected areas but selected burned sites year-round, while males showed the opposite pattern. These findings suggest that pine beetle disturbances may negatively affect caribou and female moose winter habitat availability while simultaneously enhancing conditions for male moose. Further research is needed to disentangle the individual and cumulative effects of pine beetle management actions versus general timber harvests and wildfires, as these disturbances may be compounding rather than acting in isolation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.70065","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144869325","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hunter harvest affects survival of Atlantic brant 猎人的收获影响大西洋布兰特的生存
IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-14 DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.70067
Kevin W. Dufour, Joshua L. Dooley, James O. Leafloor, Theodore C. Nichols

Adult survival is a key driver of population dynamics in long-lived species like geese. To implement effective and sustainable hunting regulations, managers need accurate estimates of survival and knowledge about the impacts of hunter harvest, particularly the extent to which this mortality is compensatory or additive to other sources. Atlantic brant (Branta bernicla hrota) are among the smallest of the North American goose populations and are vulnerable from a conservation perspective because of their limited breeding and wintering ranges, variable and low productivity, and reliance on coastal marine ecosystems. Additionally, the effects of hunter harvest on Atlantic brant survival are not fully known. We conducted both dead recovery only and joint live-dead mark-recapture analyses of Atlantic brant banded on Baffin Island and Southampton Island, Nunavut, Canada, during 2000–2018 to provide contemporary survival estimates and determine the extent to which hunter harvest was compensatory or additive. Survival probabilities of juveniles were lower and more variable (� � x� � ¯ = 0.54 ± 0.13 [SE]; range = 0.33–0.88) than adults (� � x� � ¯ = 0.84 ± 0.06; 0.74–0.95) and were influenced to a greater extent by non-harvest mortality. We found evidence of harvest additivity in adult Atlantic brant. Annual harvest of adult Atlantic brant explained 75% of the annual variability in adult survival probabilities, and the estimated process correlation between adult annual survival and recovery probabilities from a Brownie dead recovery model was negative (ρ = −0.34; SD = 0.32). Compared to other North American goose populations, Atlantic brant have lower harvest potential and less ability to compensate for hunter harvest. To ensure harvest remains sustainable, we suggest that managers should account for minimal harvest compensation in adult brant when selecting hunting regulations (i.e., season length and daily bag limits). Lastly, we encourage the use of joint live-dead models when possible because they provide greater insight into demographic processes and improved precision and accuracy on parameter estimates, particularly for juveniles.

在像鹅这样的长寿物种中,成虫存活率是种群动态的关键驱动因素。为了实施有效和可持续的狩猎法规,管理人员需要对生存进行准确的估计,并了解猎人捕捞的影响,特别是这种死亡在多大程度上是补偿性的或对其他来源的补充。大西洋雁(Branta bernicla hrota)是北美雁群中最小的雁群之一,从保护的角度来看,由于其繁殖和越冬范围有限,生产力多变且低,并且依赖沿海海洋生态系统,因此很脆弱。此外,捕猎者的捕杀对大西洋白鲸生存的影响尚不完全清楚。我们在2000年至2018年期间对加拿大努纳武特巴芬岛和南安普敦岛的大西洋布兰特进行了死亡恢复和联合活死标记-再捕获分析,以提供当代生存估计,并确定猎人收获的补偿性或补充性程度。幼鱼的存活率较低且变化较大(x¯= 0.54±0.13 [SE];范围= 0.33-0.88)比成人(x¯= 0.84±0.06;0.74-0.95)更大程度上受非采伐死亡率的影响。我们在大西洋成虫中发现了收获可加性的证据。大西洋白兰特成虫的年采获量解释了成虫存活率的年变异性的75%,并且从Brownie死亡恢复模型估计成虫年存活率与恢复概率之间的过程相关性为负(ρ = - 0.34; SD = 0.32)。与其他北美鹅种群相比,大西洋雁的收获潜力较低,弥补猎人收获的能力较弱。为了确保收获保持可持续,我们建议管理者在选择狩猎规则(即季节长度和每日袋数限制)时应考虑到成年物种的最小收获补偿。最后,我们鼓励在可能的情况下使用联合活死模型,因为它们可以更深入地了解人口统计过程,并提高参数估计的精度和准确性,特别是对青少年而言。
{"title":"Hunter harvest affects survival of Atlantic brant","authors":"Kevin W. Dufour,&nbsp;Joshua L. Dooley,&nbsp;James O. Leafloor,&nbsp;Theodore C. Nichols","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70067","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jwmg.70067","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Adult survival is a key driver of population dynamics in long-lived species like geese. To implement effective and sustainable hunting regulations, managers need accurate estimates of survival and knowledge about the impacts of hunter harvest, particularly the extent to which this mortality is compensatory or additive to other sources. Atlantic brant (<i>Branta bernicla hrota</i>) are among the smallest of the North American goose populations and are vulnerable from a conservation perspective because of their limited breeding and wintering ranges, variable and low productivity, and reliance on coastal marine ecosystems. Additionally, the effects of hunter harvest on Atlantic brant survival are not fully known. We conducted both dead recovery only and joint live-dead mark-recapture analyses of Atlantic brant banded on Baffin Island and Southampton Island, Nunavut, Canada, during 2000–2018 to provide contemporary survival estimates and determine the extent to which hunter harvest was compensatory or additive. Survival probabilities of juveniles were lower and more variable (<span></span><math>\u0000 <semantics>\u0000 <mrow>\u0000 \u0000 <mrow>\u0000 <mover>\u0000 <mi>x</mi>\u0000 \u0000 <mo>¯</mo>\u0000 </mover>\u0000 </mrow>\u0000 </mrow>\u0000 </semantics></math> = 0.54 ± 0.13 [SE]; range = 0.33–0.88) than adults (<span></span><math>\u0000 <semantics>\u0000 <mrow>\u0000 \u0000 <mrow>\u0000 <mover>\u0000 <mi>x</mi>\u0000 \u0000 <mo>¯</mo>\u0000 </mover>\u0000 </mrow>\u0000 </mrow>\u0000 </semantics></math> = 0.84 ± 0.06; 0.74–0.95) and were influenced to a greater extent by non-harvest mortality. We found evidence of harvest additivity in adult Atlantic brant. Annual harvest of adult Atlantic brant explained 75% of the annual variability in adult survival probabilities, and the estimated process correlation between adult annual survival and recovery probabilities from a Brownie dead recovery model was negative (ρ = −0.34; SD = 0.32). Compared to other North American goose populations, Atlantic brant have lower harvest potential and less ability to compensate for hunter harvest. To ensure harvest remains sustainable, we suggest that managers should account for minimal harvest compensation in adult brant when selecting hunting regulations (i.e., season length and daily bag limits). Lastly, we encourage the use of joint live-dead models when possible because they provide greater insight into demographic processes and improved precision and accuracy on parameter estimates, particularly for juveniles.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144869324","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Wildlife Management
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1