Sterling Nenninger, Brian R. Van Buren, Ashley L. Greene, Kevin B. Meehan
Combat deployments are stressful life events that confer risk for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in veterans. Typically, PTSD is conceptualized as being caused by traumatic experiences, leading research to focus predominantly on events while excluding other contributors, such as personality features. Narcissism may contribute to the deleterious effects of trauma exposure because of vulnerabilities in the sense of self, as demonstrated in research on narcissism and the development and maintenance of PTSD in civilians. However, the strength of the association between pathological narcissism features and PTSD has yet to be examined in a veteran sample. The present study sought to address this gap by comparing how narcissism contributes to variance in PTSD symptoms relative to the contribution of combat experience. In a sample of veterans deployed in support of recent operations in Afghanistan and Iraq (N = 179), regression analysis showed that higher pathological narcissism features accounted for variance beyond combat experience alone in PTSD symptoms, ∆R2 = .13, p < .001. When dimensions of narcissism were examined as separate predictors of PTSD, vulnerable, β = .45, p < .001, but not grandiose, β = −.09, p = .293, features had a significant effect on PTSD. Our results align with recent work demonstrating that personality pathology is an important factor in the study of PTSD in veterans. Further research incorporating a larger variety of variables related to personality functioning, personality traits, and life events is needed to understand the role of pathological narcissism features in the development of PTSD.
战斗部署是紧张的生活事件,会给退伍军人带来创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的风险。通常,创伤后应激障碍被定义为由创伤经历引起的,导致研究主要集中在事件上,而排除了其他因素,如人格特征。自恋可能会导致创伤暴露的有害影响,因为自我意识上的脆弱性,正如对自恋和平民PTSD发展和维持的研究所证明的那样。然而,病理性自恋特征与创伤后应激障碍之间的联系强度尚未在退伍军人样本中得到检验。本研究试图通过比较自恋与战斗经历对创伤后应激障碍症状差异的影响来解决这一差距。在最近支持阿富汗和伊拉克行动的退伍军人样本中(N = 179),回归分析表明,较高的病理性自恋特征解释了创伤后应激障碍症状的差异,∆R2 = 0.13, p
{"title":"Linking pathological narcissism to posttraumatic stress disorder in veterans","authors":"Sterling Nenninger, Brian R. Van Buren, Ashley L. Greene, Kevin B. Meehan","doi":"10.1002/jts.23142","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jts.23142","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Combat deployments are stressful life events that confer risk for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in veterans. Typically, PTSD is conceptualized as being caused by traumatic experiences, leading research to focus predominantly on events while excluding other contributors, such as personality features. Narcissism may contribute to the deleterious effects of trauma exposure because of vulnerabilities in the sense of self, as demonstrated in research on narcissism and the development and maintenance of PTSD in civilians. However, the strength of the association between pathological narcissism features and PTSD has yet to be examined in a veteran sample. The present study sought to address this gap by comparing how narcissism contributes to variance in PTSD symptoms relative to the contribution of combat experience. In a sample of veterans deployed in support of recent operations in Afghanistan and Iraq (<i>N</i> = 179), regression analysis showed that higher pathological narcissism features accounted for variance beyond combat experience alone in PTSD symptoms, ∆<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = .13, <i>p</i> < .001. When dimensions of narcissism were examined as separate predictors of PTSD, vulnerable, β = .45, <i>p</i> < .001, but not grandiose, β = −.09, <i>p</i> = .293, features had a significant effect on PTSD. Our results align with recent work demonstrating that personality pathology is an important factor in the study of PTSD in veterans. Further research incorporating a larger variety of variables related to personality functioning, personality traits, and life events is needed to understand the role of pathological narcissism features in the development of PTSD.</p>","PeriodicalId":17519,"journal":{"name":"Journal of traumatic stress","volume":"38 3","pages":"544-551"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143476794","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Victoria Alicia Torres, Elizabeth Coe, Jalisa Jackson, Kiara Leonard, Jessica Rostockyj, Kira Swensen, Eric Meyer, Suzy Bird Gulliver, Stephanie Jones
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) commonly co-occurs with other disorders. Although there are several evidence-based treatments available for PTSD and co-occurring disorders, including cognitive processing therapy (CPT), prolonged exposure (PE), acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), and the unified protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders (UP), limited findings clarify the use of baseline symptom data to help providers and patients choose among treatments. To address this, the current study examined baseline symptoms and treatment trajectories among 90 veterans and veteran family members with probable PTSD (based on PCL-5) receiving either trauma-focused (CPT, PE) or transdiagnostic (ACT, UP) treatment via telehealth, with the aim of assisting providers in recognizing patterns to inform data-driven treatment selection. Overall, there was no difference in the likelihood of clinically meaningful improvement in PTSD symptoms between transdiagnostic and trauma-focused treatments, relative risk (RR) = 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.63, 1.34]. When stratified by probable substance use disorder (SUD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) status, the results revealed a pattern suggesting that transdiagnostic treatment may be more effective for reducing PTSD symptoms among individuals with probable co-occurring SUD and MDD, RR = 1.50, 95% CI [0.27, 8.34], whereas trauma-focused treatment may be more effective for those without probable co-occurring SUD or MDD, RR = 0.56, 95% CI [0.31, 1.00]. Studies with larger samples and randomization are needed to confirm patterns. This work could be extended by comparing outcomes from other treatments and by assessing functional outcomes such as posttraumatic growth and quality of life.
{"title":"Data-informed selection of evidence-based treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder and co-occurring symptoms","authors":"Victoria Alicia Torres, Elizabeth Coe, Jalisa Jackson, Kiara Leonard, Jessica Rostockyj, Kira Swensen, Eric Meyer, Suzy Bird Gulliver, Stephanie Jones","doi":"10.1002/jts.23133","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jts.23133","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) commonly co-occurs with other disorders. Although there are several evidence-based treatments available for PTSD and co-occurring disorders, including cognitive processing therapy (CPT), prolonged exposure (PE), acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), and the unified protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders (UP), limited findings clarify the use of baseline symptom data to help providers and patients choose among treatments. To address this, the current study examined baseline symptoms and treatment trajectories among 90 veterans and veteran family members with probable PTSD (based on PCL-5) receiving either trauma-focused (CPT, PE) or transdiagnostic (ACT, UP) treatment via telehealth, with the aim of assisting providers in recognizing patterns to inform data-driven treatment selection. Overall, there was no difference in the likelihood of clinically meaningful improvement in PTSD symptoms between transdiagnostic and trauma-focused treatments, relative risk (<i>RR</i>) = 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.63, 1.34]. When stratified by probable substance use disorder (SUD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) status, the results revealed a pattern suggesting that transdiagnostic treatment may be more effective for reducing PTSD symptoms among individuals with probable co-occurring SUD and MDD, <i>RR</i> = 1.50, 95% CI [0.27, 8.34], whereas trauma-focused treatment may be more effective for those without probable co-occurring SUD or MDD, <i>RR</i> = 0.56, 95% CI [0.31, 1.00]. Studies with larger samples and randomization are needed to confirm patterns. This work could be extended by comparing outcomes from other treatments and by assessing functional outcomes such as posttraumatic growth and quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":17519,"journal":{"name":"Journal of traumatic stress","volume":"38 3","pages":"387-398"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143440873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nicola Park, Julien Rouvere, Erin Chase, Brittany E. Blanchard, Debra L. Kaysen, Rebecca C. Hendrickson, John C. Fortney, Joseph M. Cerimele
Evidence describing the association between sleep quality and trauma-focused therapy is mixed. This secondary analysis of a primary care sample examined whether (a) baseline sleep quality moderated posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptom severity over time across groups receiving different doses of cognitive processing therapy (CPT) and (b) sleep quality improved over time with CPT. Participants were 227 adults who screened positive for PTSD and were participating in a clinical trial comparing two models of PTSD treatment delivery in primary care. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) were used to assess sleep disturbance and PTSD symptom severity, respectively. Multiple linear regression was used to assess whether baseline PSQI scores moderated 12-month PCL-5 scores across CPT dosage groups (0 sessions: 51.1%, 1–7 sessions: 31.7%; ≥ 8 sessions [adequate dose]: 17.2%) and whether PSQI scores differed by group at 12-month follow-up. Post hoc analyses examined changes in PCL-5 sleep disturbance items. Baseline sleep disturbance did not moderate the effect of CPT on PTSD severity among participants with an adequate CPT dose, p > .112. Sleep quality improved with adequate dose, B = -2.63, SE = 0.75, p < .001. Differences in change scores across groups for PCL-5 Item 2, F(2, 435) = 11.34, and Item 20, H(2) = 32.04, indicated that participants with an adequate CPT dose had greater reductions in trauma-related sleep symptoms than those who received 0–7 sessions, ps < .001. Residual post-CPT sleep impairment despite adequate PTSD improvement warrants further interventions.
有关睡眠质量和创伤治疗之间关系的证据众说纷纭。这项对初级保健样本的二次分析检验了(a)基线睡眠质量是否随着时间的推移在接受不同剂量认知处理疗法(CPT)的组中减缓了创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状的严重程度,以及(b)睡眠质量是否随着时间的推移而改善了CPT。参与者是227名PTSD筛查呈阳性的成年人,他们参加了一项比较初级保健中两种PTSD治疗模式的临床试验。采用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)和DSM-5 PTSD检查表(PCL-5)分别评估睡眠障碍和PTSD症状严重程度。使用多元线性回归来评估基线PSQI评分是否会调节CPT剂量组12个月的PCL-5评分(0个疗程:51.1%,1-7个疗程:31.7%;≥8次疗程[足够剂量]:17.2%),以及12个月随访时各组PSQI评分是否存在差异。事后分析检查了PCL-5睡眠障碍项目的变化。基线睡眠障碍并没有减缓CPT对PTSD严重程度的影响,在CPT剂量足够的参与者中,p < 0.05。剂量足够可改善睡眠质量,B = -2.63, SE = 0.75, p
{"title":"Associations among sleep quality, cognitive processing therapy, and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in a primary care setting","authors":"Nicola Park, Julien Rouvere, Erin Chase, Brittany E. Blanchard, Debra L. Kaysen, Rebecca C. Hendrickson, John C. Fortney, Joseph M. Cerimele","doi":"10.1002/jts.23132","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jts.23132","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Evidence describing the association between sleep quality and trauma-focused therapy is mixed. This secondary analysis of a primary care sample examined whether (a) baseline sleep quality moderated posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptom severity over time across groups receiving different doses of cognitive processing therapy (CPT) and (b) sleep quality improved over time with CPT. Participants were 227 adults who screened positive for PTSD and were participating in a clinical trial comparing two models of PTSD treatment delivery in primary care. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and PTSD Checklist for <i>DSM-5</i> (PCL-5) were used to assess sleep disturbance and PTSD symptom severity, respectively. Multiple linear regression was used to assess whether baseline PSQI scores moderated 12-month PCL-5 scores across CPT dosage groups (0 sessions: 51.1%, 1–7 sessions: 31.7%; ≥ 8 sessions [adequate dose]: 17.2%) and whether PSQI scores differed by group at 12-month follow-up. Post hoc analyses examined changes in PCL-5 sleep disturbance items. Baseline sleep disturbance did not moderate the effect of CPT on PTSD severity among participants with an adequate CPT dose, <i>p</i> > .112. Sleep quality improved with adequate dose, <i>B</i> = -2.63, <i>SE</i> = 0.75, <i>p</i> < .001. Differences in change scores across groups for PCL-5 Item 2, <i>F</i>(2, 435) = 11.34, and Item 20, <i>H</i>(2) = 32.04, indicated that participants with an adequate CPT dose had greater reductions in trauma-related sleep symptoms than those who received 0–7 sessions, <i>p</i>s < .001. Residual post-CPT sleep impairment despite adequate PTSD improvement warrants further interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":17519,"journal":{"name":"Journal of traumatic stress","volume":"38 3","pages":"376-386"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jts.23132","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143399534","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kagee, A., Bantjes, J., Saal, W., & Sterley, A. (2022). Predicting posttraumatic stress disorder caseness using the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 among patients receiving care for HIV. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 35(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22654
In Table 3, the confidence interval for Sensitivity should be [80.2, 93.7].
Kagee, A., Bantjes, J., Saal, W., & Sterley, A.(2022)。使用DSM-5中的创伤后应激障碍检查表预测接受HIV治疗的患者的创伤后应激障碍病例。心理创伤杂志,35(1),13-21。https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22654In表3,Sensitivity的置信区间应为[80.2,93.7]。
{"title":"Correction to “Predicting posttraumatic stress disorder caseness using the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 among patients receiving care for HIV”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/jts.23139","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jts.23139","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Kagee, A., Bantjes, J., Saal, W., & Sterley, A. (2022). Predicting posttraumatic stress disorder caseness using the PTSD Checklist for <i>DSM-5</i> among patients receiving care for HIV. <i>Journal of Traumatic Stress</i>, <i>35</i>(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22654</p><p>In Table 3, the confidence interval for Sensitivity should be [80.2, 93.7].</p>","PeriodicalId":17519,"journal":{"name":"Journal of traumatic stress","volume":"38 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jts.23139","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143255993","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Genevieve Alice Woolverton, Tiffany Yip, Ritika Rastogi, Hyeouk Chris Hahm, Cindy H. Liu
Race-based traumatic stress (RBTS) is a psychological response to racial discrimination among individuals with marginalized racial/ethnic identities, but the literature about how different forms of racial discrimination contribute to RBTS is lacking. We compared the effects of major, everyday, and vicarious racial discrimination on RBTS and evaluated the associations between ethnic–racial identity (ERI) and RBTS. Analyses used cross-sectional survey data from Black, Asian, and Latine young adults (N = 1,342, Mage = 25.9 years) collected in 2022. Demographic variables; major, everyday, and vicarious racial discrimination; ERI commitment and exploration; and RBTS were assessed. Hierarchical multiple regression was used to identify correlates of RBTS. Everyday, β = .37, p < .001; vicarious, β = .16, p < .001; and major racial discrimination, β = .16, p = .004, predicted RBTS. Neither ERI commitment nor ERI exploration was significantly associated with RBTS. Race did not moderate the associations between major, everyday, or vicarious discrimination and RBTS, highlighting that Black, Asian, and Latine young adults appear to be equally at risk. As most vicarious racial discrimination and RBTS research has focused on Black samples, we expand the literature by including Latine and Asian young adults. Our observation that vicarious racial discrimination was a similarly strong predictor of RBTS compared to everyday and major racial discrimination underscores the importance of its inclusion in research focused on discrimination and mental health. Taken together, clinical assessment should focus on questions related to diverse experiences of racial discrimination for individuals with marginalized racial identities.
基于种族的创伤应激(RBTS)是边缘种族/民族身份个体对种族歧视的心理反应,但关于不同形式的种族歧视如何导致RBTS的文献缺乏。我们比较了主要种族歧视、日常种族歧视和间接种族歧视对RBTS的影响,并评估了族裔-种族认同(ERI)与RBTS之间的关系。分析使用了2022年收集的黑人、亚洲人和拉丁裔年轻人(N = 1342,年龄为25.9岁)的横断面调查数据。人口统计学变量;主要的、日常的、间接的种族歧视;ERI的承诺与探索;和RBTS进行评估。采用层次多元回归分析RBTS的相关因素。每天,β = 0.37, p
{"title":"Differential associations between race-based traumatic stress and major, everyday, and vicarious racial discrimination among young adults of color","authors":"Genevieve Alice Woolverton, Tiffany Yip, Ritika Rastogi, Hyeouk Chris Hahm, Cindy H. Liu","doi":"10.1002/jts.23130","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jts.23130","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Race-based traumatic stress (RBTS) is a psychological response to racial discrimination among individuals with marginalized racial/ethnic identities, but the literature about how different forms of racial discrimination contribute to RBTS is lacking. We compared the effects of major, everyday, and vicarious racial discrimination on RBTS and evaluated the associations between ethnic–racial identity (ERI) and RBTS. Analyses used cross-sectional survey data from Black, Asian, and Latine young adults (<i>N</i> = 1,342, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 25.9 years) collected in 2022. Demographic variables; major, everyday, and vicarious racial discrimination; ERI commitment and exploration; and RBTS were assessed. Hierarchical multiple regression was used to identify correlates of RBTS. Everyday, β = .37, <i>p</i> < .001; vicarious, β = .16, <i>p</i> < .001; and major racial discrimination, β = .16, <i>p</i> = .004, predicted RBTS. Neither ERI commitment nor ERI exploration was significantly associated with RBTS. Race did not moderate the associations between major, everyday, or vicarious discrimination and RBTS, highlighting that Black, Asian, and Latine young adults appear to be equally at risk. As most vicarious racial discrimination and RBTS research has focused on Black samples, we expand the literature by including Latine and Asian young adults. Our observation that vicarious racial discrimination was a similarly strong predictor of RBTS compared to everyday and major racial discrimination underscores the importance of its inclusion in research focused on discrimination and mental health. Taken together, clinical assessment should focus on questions related to diverse experiences of racial discrimination for individuals with marginalized racial identities.</p>","PeriodicalId":17519,"journal":{"name":"Journal of traumatic stress","volume":"38 2","pages":"330-340"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143189541","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Eileen P. Barden, Shaina A. Kumar, Julia C. Sager, Johanna Thompson-Hollands, Daniel J. Lee, Kelly Harper, Terence M. Keane, Brian P. Marx
Posttraumatic growth (PTG) is characterized as the experience of positive psychological change following exposure to traumatic stress. However, studies examining the association between posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms and PTG have demonstrated mixed results. Further, although higher levels of social support have been shown to predict higher ratings of PTG, there are limited longitudinal findings regarding how interpersonal functioning may affect the association between PTSD symptoms and PTG. In this study, we examined interpersonal functioning in romantic relationships and friendships as mediators of the relation between PTSD symptom severity and PTG and examined potential sex differences among these associations. Participants were 1,427 veterans who completed self-report questionnaires across three time points. A parallel mediation analysis indicated that romantic relationship, β = −.01, 95% CI [−.03, −.001], and friendship, β = −.02, 95% CI [−.04, −.001], functioning were both indirectly associated with PTG in the full sample. Moreover, sex-stratified models indicated that romantic relationship functioning was a significant mediator for male veterans, β = −.02, 95% CI [−.05, −.01], whereas friendship functioning was a significant mediator for female veterans, β = −.04, 95% CI [−.08, −.01]. Together, these findings suggest that interpersonal functioning is an important factor in PTG, and targeting romantic relationship and friendship functioning in the context of trauma-focused treatment may be valuable and can help build a pathway from PTSD symptoms to PTG among female and male veterans.
{"title":"Posttraumatic stress and posttraumatic growth among female and male veterans: The contribution of romantic relationship and friendship functioning","authors":"Eileen P. Barden, Shaina A. Kumar, Julia C. Sager, Johanna Thompson-Hollands, Daniel J. Lee, Kelly Harper, Terence M. Keane, Brian P. Marx","doi":"10.1002/jts.23134","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jts.23134","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Posttraumatic growth (PTG) is characterized as the experience of positive psychological change following exposure to traumatic stress. However, studies examining the association between posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms and PTG have demonstrated mixed results. Further, although higher levels of social support have been shown to predict higher ratings of PTG, there are limited longitudinal findings regarding how interpersonal functioning may affect the association between PTSD symptoms and PTG. In this study, we examined interpersonal functioning in romantic relationships and friendships as mediators of the relation between PTSD symptom severity and PTG and examined potential sex differences among these associations. Participants were 1,427 veterans who completed self-report questionnaires across three time points. A parallel mediation analysis indicated that romantic relationship, β = −.01, 95% CI [−.03, −.001], and friendship, β = −.02, 95% CI [−.04, −.001], functioning were both indirectly associated with PTG in the full sample. Moreover, sex-stratified models indicated that romantic relationship functioning was a significant mediator for male veterans, β = −.02, 95% CI [−.05, −.01], whereas friendship functioning was a significant mediator for female veterans, β = −.04, 95% CI [−.08, −.01]. Together, these findings suggest that interpersonal functioning is an important factor in PTG, and targeting romantic relationship and friendship functioning in the context of trauma-focused treatment may be valuable and can help build a pathway from PTSD symptoms to PTG among female and male veterans.</p>","PeriodicalId":17519,"journal":{"name":"Journal of traumatic stress","volume":"38 3","pages":"399-409"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143066714","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The outbreak of the Israel–Hamas war on October 7, 2023, has presented unprecedented challenges to older adults’ mental health, including increased posttraumatic stress, anxiety, and depression. The current study examined potential war- and age-related factors associated with probable posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), clinical depression (probable depression), and generalized anxiety disorder (probable anxiety) among older adults during the ongoing war. Moreover, due to the continued threat of death, we examined whether death anxiety is an additional contributing factor to older adults’ probable PTSD, depression, and anxiety. Data were collected January–March 2024 from 554 community-dwelling older adults (Mage = 73.90 years, SD = 7.35, range: 61–96 years) who completed online scales assessing sociodemographic variables, war exposure (distance from the Gaza Strip, exposure to terror attacks/blasts), and age-related constructs (assistance in daily activities [ADL], cognitive decline, physical illnesses, death anxiety). Increased ADL was associated with probable depression, B = 0.62, OR = 1.87, and anxiety, B = 0.42, OR = 1.53, and cognitive decline was associated with probable depression, B = 1.52, OR = 4.56. Older adults with high levels of death anxiety were almost 3 times as likely to meet the criteria for probable PTSD, B = 1.05, OR = 2.85, and more than 1.5 as likely to meet the criteria for probable depression, B = 0.54, OR = 1.71, and anxiety, B = 0.50, OR = 1.65. The importance of death anxiety as a potential risk factor for negative psychological outcomes among older adults during war is discussed.
2023年10月7日以色列-哈马斯战争的爆发,给老年人的心理健康带来了前所未有的挑战,包括创伤后压力、焦虑和抑郁加剧。目前的研究调查了战争和年龄相关的潜在因素,这些因素与持续战争中的老年人可能出现的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)、临床抑郁症(可能是抑郁症)和广泛性焦虑症(可能是焦虑症)有关。此外,由于死亡的持续威胁,我们研究了死亡焦虑是否是老年人可能的创伤后应激障碍、抑郁和焦虑的一个额外因素。数据收集于2024年1月至3月,来自554名居住在社区的老年人(年龄= 73.90岁,SD = 7.35,范围:61-96岁),他们完成了在线量表,评估社会人口统计学变量、战争暴露(距离加沙地带的距离、暴露于恐怖袭击/爆炸)和年龄相关结构(日常活动援助[ADL]、认知能力下降、身体疾病、死亡焦虑)。ADL升高与可能的抑郁相关,B = 0.62, OR = 1.87;焦虑相关,B = 0.42, OR = 1.53;认知能力下降与可能的抑郁相关,B = 1.52, OR = 4.56。具有高水平死亡焦虑的老年人符合可能的PTSD标准的可能性几乎是其3倍,B = 1.05, OR = 2.85,符合可能的抑郁症标准的可能性是其1.5倍以上,B = 0.54, OR = 1.71,以及焦虑,B = 0.50, OR = 1.65。死亡焦虑的重要性,作为一个潜在的风险因素的负面心理结果在老年人战争期间进行了讨论。
{"title":"Associations between death anxiety and probable posttraumatic stress disorder and clinical depression and anxiety in older Israeli adults during wartime","authors":"Yoav S. Bergman, Rotem Saar-Ashkenazy, Yifat Faran, Eyal Klonover, Yuval Palgi","doi":"10.1002/jts.23131","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jts.23131","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The outbreak of the Israel–Hamas war on October 7, 2023, has presented unprecedented challenges to older adults’ mental health, including increased posttraumatic stress, anxiety, and depression. The current study examined potential war- and age-related factors associated with probable posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), clinical depression (<i>probable depression</i>), and generalized anxiety disorder (<i>probable anxiety</i>) among older adults during the ongoing war. Moreover, due to the continued threat of death, we examined whether death anxiety is an additional contributing factor to older adults’ probable PTSD, depression, and anxiety. Data were collected January–March 2024 from 554 community-dwelling older adults (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 73.90 years, <i>SD</i> = 7.35, range: 61–96 years) who completed online scales assessing sociodemographic variables, war exposure (distance from the Gaza Strip, exposure to terror attacks/blasts), and age-related constructs (assistance in daily activities [ADL], cognitive decline, physical illnesses, death anxiety). Increased ADL was associated with probable depression, <i>B</i> = 0.62, <i>OR</i> = 1.87, and anxiety, <i>B</i> = 0.42, <i>OR</i> = 1.53, and cognitive decline was associated with probable depression, <i>B</i> = 1.52, <i>OR</i> = 4.56. Older adults with high levels of death anxiety were almost 3 times as likely to meet the criteria for probable PTSD, <i>B</i> = 1.05, <i>OR =</i> 2.85, and more than 1.5 as likely to meet the criteria for probable depression, <i>B</i> = 0.54, <i>OR</i> = 1.71, and anxiety, <i>B</i> = 0.50, <i>OR</i> = 1.65. The importance of death anxiety as a potential risk factor for negative psychological outcomes among older adults during war is discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":17519,"journal":{"name":"Journal of traumatic stress","volume":"38 4","pages":"638-645"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143047222","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Olivia Metcalf, Le Pham, Karen E. Lamb, Sophie Zaloumis, Meaghan L. O'Donnell, Tianchen Qian, Tracey Varker, Sean Cowlishaw, David Forbes
Problematic anger affects up to 30% of individuals who have experienced trauma. Digital mental health approaches, such as ecological momentary assessment (EMA) delivered via smartphone and wearable devices (i.e., wearables), hold significant potential for the development of novel digital technology treatments. The objective of this cohort study was to examine the acceptability, feasibility, and outcomes from 10 days of usage of a digital mental health tool combining EMA and wearable use among trauma-exposed adults with problematic anger. We used mixed methods to examine feasibility and acceptability and explored quantitative changes in mental health symptoms among participants over the study period (N = 98, 80.4% women, Mage = 38 years). Quantitative and qualitative data revealed that regular EMA combined with a wearable was feasible and acceptable in the sample. We observed reductions in problem anger, p < .001, repeated-measures d (dRM) = -0.81, 95% CI [-1.04, -0.59]; and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms, p = .025, dRM = -0.26, 95% CI [-0.55, -0.03], over the 10 days of monitoring. Qualitative findings suggest that by regularly “checking in” on anger symptoms, participants improved their self-awareness and ability to self-manage their mood. These findings provide valuable learnings for building future personalized digital mental health tools.
{"title":"A mixed-methods investigation of a digital mental health tool to manage posttrauma anger","authors":"Olivia Metcalf, Le Pham, Karen E. Lamb, Sophie Zaloumis, Meaghan L. O'Donnell, Tianchen Qian, Tracey Varker, Sean Cowlishaw, David Forbes","doi":"10.1002/jts.23126","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jts.23126","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Problematic anger affects up to 30% of individuals who have experienced trauma. Digital mental health approaches, such as ecological momentary assessment (EMA) delivered via smartphone and wearable devices (i.e., <i>wearables</i>), hold significant potential for the development of novel digital technology treatments. The objective of this cohort study was to examine the acceptability, feasibility, and outcomes from 10 days of usage of a digital mental health tool combining EMA and wearable use among trauma-exposed adults with problematic anger. We used mixed methods to examine feasibility and acceptability and explored quantitative changes in mental health symptoms among participants over the study period (<i>N</i> = 98, 80.4% women, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 38 years). Quantitative and qualitative data revealed that regular EMA combined with a wearable was feasible and acceptable in the sample. We observed reductions in problem anger, <i>p</i> < .001, repeated-measures <i>d</i> (<i>d</i><sub>RM</sub>) = -0.81, 95% CI [-1.04, -0.59]; and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms, <i>p</i> = .025, <i>d</i><sub>RM</sub> = -0.26, 95% CI [-0.55, -0.03], over the 10 days of monitoring. Qualitative findings suggest that by regularly “checking in” on anger symptoms, participants improved their self-awareness and ability to self-manage their mood. These findings provide valuable learnings for building future personalized digital mental health tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":17519,"journal":{"name":"Journal of traumatic stress","volume":"38 2","pages":"296-304"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jts.23126","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143047220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tracey Varker, Julia Fredrickson, James Agathos, Phoebe Howlett, Alexandra Howard, Meaghan L. O'Donnell
Individuals exposed to disasters are at high risk of developing mental health conditions, yet the availability of mental health practitioners is often limited. The aim of this scoping review was to examine the quality of the evidence for psychosocial interventions that can be delivered by non–mental health workers in the context of disasters. Searches were performed in PsycInfo, EMBASE, Family & Society Studies Worldwide, CINAHL, Global Health, PubMed, and SCOPUS, from inception through to November 2024, to identify studies of relevance. Only studies investigating psychosocial interventions that could be delivered by non–mental health clinicians in a non–hospital or clinic setting were included. In total, 69 primary intervention studies examining 27 universal interventions and 10 indicated interventions were identified. Studies were rated on quality and risk of bias, and GRADE was used to rank the evidence for each intervention. For universal interventions, no study had an evidence rating above “very low” to support confidence in a significant impact on clinical outcomes. For indicated interventions, Problem Management Plus (PM+) and Self-Help Plus (SH+) had an evidence rating of “high” in the postdisaster context, and Skills for Life Adjustment and Resilience (SOLAR) had a “low” evidence rating; the remaining interventions were given “very low” ratings. Despite the high number of psychosocial interventions that target postdisaster distress, very few have been tested using rigorous methodologies with large samples. Future research should include methodologies that test interventions at scale and recognize the impacts of compounding disasters.
遭受灾害的个人患精神疾病的风险很高,但精神卫生从业人员的可用性往往有限。本次范围审查的目的是检查在灾害情况下非精神卫生工作者可提供的社会心理干预措施的证据质量。从成立到2024年11月,在PsycInfo、EMBASE、Family & Society Studies Worldwide、CINAHL、Global Health、PubMed和SCOPUS中进行了检索,以确定相关性研究。仅包括调查非医院或诊所环境中非精神卫生临床医生可提供的心理社会干预措施的研究。总共确定了69项初级干预研究,检查了27项普遍干预措施和10项指示性干预措施。对研究的质量和偏倚风险进行评级,并使用GRADE对每种干预措施的证据进行排序。对于普遍干预措施,没有研究的证据评级高于“非常低”,以支持对临床结果产生重大影响的信心。对于指示性干预措施,问题管理+ (PM+)和自助+ (SH+)在灾后情境下的证据评级为“高”,而生活适应技能和恢复力(SOLAR)的证据评级为“低”;其余干预措施的评级为“非常低”。尽管有大量针对灾后痛苦的心理社会干预措施,但很少有采用大样本的严格方法进行过测试。未来的研究应包括测试大规模干预措施的方法,并认识到复合灾害的影响。
{"title":"A scoping review of psychosocial interventions delivered by non–mental health workers following disaster events","authors":"Tracey Varker, Julia Fredrickson, James Agathos, Phoebe Howlett, Alexandra Howard, Meaghan L. O'Donnell","doi":"10.1002/jts.23127","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jts.23127","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Individuals exposed to disasters are at high risk of developing mental health conditions, yet the availability of mental health practitioners is often limited. The aim of this scoping review was to examine the quality of the evidence for psychosocial interventions that can be delivered by non–mental health workers in the context of disasters. Searches were performed in PsycInfo, EMBASE, Family & Society Studies Worldwide, CINAHL, Global Health, PubMed, and SCOPUS, from inception through to November 2024, to identify studies of relevance. Only studies investigating psychosocial interventions that could be delivered by non–mental health clinicians in a non–hospital or clinic setting were included. In total, 69 primary intervention studies examining 27 universal interventions and 10 indicated interventions were identified. Studies were rated on quality and risk of bias, and GRADE was used to rank the evidence for each intervention. For universal interventions, no study had an evidence rating above “very low” to support confidence in a significant impact on clinical outcomes. For indicated interventions, Problem Management Plus (PM+) and Self-Help Plus (SH+) had an evidence rating of “high” in the postdisaster context, and Skills for Life Adjustment and Resilience (SOLAR) had a “low” evidence rating; the remaining interventions were given “very low” ratings. Despite the high number of psychosocial interventions that target postdisaster distress, very few have been tested using rigorous methodologies with large samples. Future research should include methodologies that test interventions at scale and recognize the impacts of compounding disasters.</p>","PeriodicalId":17519,"journal":{"name":"Journal of traumatic stress","volume":"38 2","pages":"208-221"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143007771","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ateka A. Contractor, Brett A. Messman, Sheila Daniela Dicker-Oren, Sidonia E. Compton, Danica C. Slavish, Sharon R. Sznitman, Talya Greene
The processing of positive memories technique (PPMT) entails detailed narration and processing of specific positive autobiographical memories (AM) and has shown promise in improving posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. We examined whether participants receiving PPMT reported decreases in PTSD and depressive symptom severity, negative affect levels/reactivity, posttrauma cognitions, and positive emotion dysregulation, as well as increases in positive affect levels/reactivity and the number of retrieved positive AMs across four PPMT sessions. Individuals (N = 70) recruited from the community completed surveys at baseline (pre-PPMT), each PPMT session, and after completing all four PPMT sessions. Multilevel linear growth models indicated session-to-session decreases in PTSD severity, β = −.17, p < .001; depressive symptom severity, β = −.13, p < .001; negative affect levels, β = −.13, p < .001; positive affect reactivity, β = −.14, p = .014; and posttrauma cognitions, β = −.12, p < .001; and session-to-session increases in negative affect reactivity, β = .18, p = .001. Paired-samples t tests indicated decreases in retrieved positive AMs, d = 0.40, p = .001, including specific positive AMs, and negative AMs, d = 0.23, p = .022, and increases in retrieved overgeneral positive AMs, d = −0.38, p = .002, from baseline to postintervention. Thus, PPMT may help decrease PTSD and depression severity, negative affect, posttrauma cognitions, and negative AM recall tendencies. Clinicians may need to incorporate additional skills into the PPMT framework to improve positive affect processes that can be sustained over time.
{"title":"Therapeutic impacts of recalling and processing positive autobiographical memories on posttrauma health: An open-label study","authors":"Ateka A. Contractor, Brett A. Messman, Sheila Daniela Dicker-Oren, Sidonia E. Compton, Danica C. Slavish, Sharon R. Sznitman, Talya Greene","doi":"10.1002/jts.23129","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jts.23129","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The <i>processing of positive memories technique</i> (PPMT) entails detailed narration and processing of specific positive autobiographical memories (AM) and has shown promise in improving posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. We examined whether participants receiving PPMT reported decreases in PTSD and depressive symptom severity, negative affect levels/reactivity, posttrauma cognitions, and positive emotion dysregulation, as well as increases in positive affect levels/reactivity and the number of retrieved positive AMs across four PPMT sessions. Individuals (<i>N</i> = 70) recruited from the community completed surveys at baseline (pre-PPMT), each PPMT session, and after completing all four PPMT sessions. Multilevel linear growth models indicated session-to-session decreases in PTSD severity, β = −.17, <i>p</i> < .001; depressive symptom severity, β = −.13, <i>p</i> < .001; negative affect levels, β = −.13, <i>p</i> < .001; positive affect reactivity, β = −.14, <i>p</i> = .014; and posttrauma cognitions, β = −.12, <i>p</i> < .001; and session-to-session increases in negative affect reactivity, β = .18, <i>p</i> = .001. Paired-samples <i>t</i> tests indicated decreases in retrieved positive AMs, <i>d</i> = 0.40, <i>p</i> = .001, including specific positive AMs, and negative AMs, <i>d</i> = 0.23, <i>p</i> = .022, and increases in retrieved overgeneral positive AMs, <i>d</i> = −0.38, <i>p</i> = .002, from baseline to postintervention. Thus, PPMT may help decrease PTSD and depression severity, negative affect, posttrauma cognitions, and negative AM recall tendencies. Clinicians may need to incorporate additional skills into the PPMT framework to improve positive affect processes that can be sustained over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":17519,"journal":{"name":"Journal of traumatic stress","volume":"38 2","pages":"317-329"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143007748","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}