With the rapid advancement of molecular pathology and the explosion of genomic data, our understanding of neoplasms continues to evolve. In this review, we introduce 3 recently classified mesenchymal neoplasms, the categorization of which was refined based on their underlying molecular genetic profiles. These entities were recently highlighted by the senior author at the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology Long Course. To underscore the importance of their proper recognition, this review was prepared to reach a broader audience. Recognition of these tumors is particularly important because their mimickers often have markedly disparate prognoses and management strategies, making accurate diagnosis critical. The 3 entities discussed in this study are the following: (1) SRF-rearranged myoid neoplasms (formerly cellular myofibroma), (2) superficial CD34-positive fibroblastic tumors, and (3) kinase-altered spindle cell neoplasms. This review aimed to highlight the key clinicopathologic features of these tumors to facilitate accurate diagnosis, discuss ancillary studies that assist in navigating the differential diagnoses, and outline strategies to avoid common diagnostic pitfalls. Finally, we emphasize when molecular characterization may be necessary to guide diagnosis and support appropriate clinical management.
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma/High-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 rearrangement (DLBCL/HGBCL-MYC/BCL2) is a distinct disease entity with worse prognosis and is usually diagnosed with identification of MYC and BCL2 rearrangement by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. Recent progress in gene expression analysis has identified a dark zone signature (DZsig), which characterizes a gene expression profile (GEP) for DLBCL/HGBCL-MYC/BCL2. Notably, DZsig includes both MYC/BCL2-double-hit and non-double-hit cases with DLBCL, and high-grade and Burkitt morphologies; importantly, the latter group is present in numbers that are comparable to or greater than the former group. Although GEP analysis can identify cases exhibiting HGBCL-like biology regardless of double-hit status, GEP analysis will not be globally applied to DLBCL cases due to cost and equipment constraints. Therefore, simpler surrogate approaches for detecting DZsig, such as immunohistochemistry (IHC), are desired. Here, we attempted to develop an immunohistochemical approach that can serve as an alternative to GEP or FISH assays utilizing 287 tumors with DLBCL morphology, regardless of double-hit status. Our strategy for detecting DZsig by IHC is based on a two-step algorithm, which involves applying the Hans classifier and antibodies to MYC, ALOX5, and LMO2. The DZ-IHC algorithm had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 76.2%, 95.5%, 59.3%, and 98.1%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates for immunohistochemical DZ (iDZ)-positive, iDZ-negative subtypes in GCB-type and non-GCB-type tumors were 55%, 82%, and 69%, respectively (p < 0.01), which is similar to that reported using the GEP assay. To date, this represents the largest cohort evaluated for DZsig selection by IHC; nevertheless, the algorithm is not yet adequate for routine application owing to its suboptimal PPV and further improvements are needed for clinical implementation.
Endometrial carcinoma with no specific molecular profile (NSMP) is a clinicopathologically heterogeneous group of diseases with an overall intermediate prognosis. Prognostic refinement is needed for better personalized treatment. The updated European Society of Gynecological Oncology-European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology-European Society of Pathology guidelines for endometrial carcinoma stratify NSMP according to histotype and estrogen receptor (ER) status. ER (with other ancillary markers) also helps differentiate histotypes of endometrial carcinoma. This study describes clinicopathological characteristics of ER-positive and -negative-NSMP endometrial carcinoma. Furthermore, we investigate the prognostic and diagnostic significance of ER, GATA3, TTF1, and KRAS in a large and relatively unselected NSMP carcinoma cohort. POLE sequencing results and immunohistochemistry for p53, mismatch repair proteins, and ER were available for 930 samples of endometrial carcinoma. Within NSMP cases (n = 377), 22 samples presented ER staining in <1% of the carcinoma cells, 5 cases in 1% to 9%, and 350 cases in ≥10%. ER expression ≥10% predicted an excellent outcome (comparable with POLE-mutated cases) in univariable analysis, where ER negativity (<10%) was associated with a poor outcome (comparable with p53 abnormal cases). Most ER-positive NSMP cases were low-grade endometrioid carcinomas, whereas most ER-negative NSMP cases were nonendometrioid or high-grade endometrioid carcinomas. In addition to high-risk histotype, ER negativity was associated with various other clinicopathological risk factors. In multivariable analysis adjusting for histotype and other risk factors, ER did not independently predict disease progression (P = .814). No disease-related deaths were observed in the rare (n = 3) patients with ER-negative-low-grade endometrioid carcinoma. GATA3/TTF1 positivity and KRAS mutation were discovered not only in mesonephric-like carcinoma but also in endometrioid carcinoma. No prognostic relevance was found for these markers. In conclusion, the different prognosis of ER-positive vs ER-negative-NSMP endometrial carcinoma is not attributable to ER status itself but rather to its strong correlation with histotype and other clinicopathological risk factors. Limited specificity of GATA3, TTF1, and KRAS warrants caution in their use as diagnostic markers of mesonephric-like carcinoma.

