Pub Date : 2025-01-02DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100688
Hooman H Rashidi, Joshua Pantanowitz, Mathew Hanna, Ahmad P Tafti, Parth Sanghani, Adam Buchinsky, Brandon Fennell, Mustafa Deebajah, Sarah Wheeler, Thomas Pearce, Ibrahim Abukhiran, Scott Robertson, Octavia Palmer, Mert Gur, Nam K Tran, Liron Pantanowitz
This manuscript serves as an introduction to a comprehensive seven-part review article series on artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) and their current and future influence within pathology and medicine. This introductory review provides a comprehensive grasp of this fast-expanding realm and its potential to transform medical diagnosis, workflow, research, and education. Fundamental terminology employed in AI-ML is covered using an extensive dictionary. The article also provides a broad overview of the main domains in the AI-ML field, encompassing both generative and non-generative (traditional) AI. Thereby serving as a primer to the other six review articles in this series that describe the details about statistics, regulations, bias, ethical dilemmas, and ML-Ops in AI-ML. The intent of these review articles is to better equip individuals who are or will be working in an AI-enabled healthcare system.
{"title":"Introduction to Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) in Pathology & Medicine: Generative & Non-Generative AI Basics.","authors":"Hooman H Rashidi, Joshua Pantanowitz, Mathew Hanna, Ahmad P Tafti, Parth Sanghani, Adam Buchinsky, Brandon Fennell, Mustafa Deebajah, Sarah Wheeler, Thomas Pearce, Ibrahim Abukhiran, Scott Robertson, Octavia Palmer, Mert Gur, Nam K Tran, Liron Pantanowitz","doi":"10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100688","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100688","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This manuscript serves as an introduction to a comprehensive seven-part review article series on artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) and their current and future influence within pathology and medicine. This introductory review provides a comprehensive grasp of this fast-expanding realm and its potential to transform medical diagnosis, workflow, research, and education. Fundamental terminology employed in AI-ML is covered using an extensive dictionary. The article also provides a broad overview of the main domains in the AI-ML field, encompassing both generative and non-generative (traditional) AI. Thereby serving as a primer to the other six review articles in this series that describe the details about statistics, regulations, bias, ethical dilemmas, and ML-Ops in AI-ML. The intent of these review articles is to better equip individuals who are or will be working in an AI-enabled healthcare system.</p>","PeriodicalId":18706,"journal":{"name":"Modern Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"100688"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142927611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-25DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100702
Yang Zong, Rongrong Huang, Mireille Bitar, Alexandra Drakaki, Liying Zhang, Douglas I Lin, Huihui Ye
Embryonic-type neuroectodermal tumors (ENTs) arising from testicular germ cell tumors (GCTs) are a relatively common type of somatic transformation in GCTs with poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options, particularly when patients develop disease recurrence or metastasis. Knowledge of key events driving this transformation is limited to the paucity of comprehensive genomic data. We performed a retrospective database search in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments- and College of American Pathologists-certified laboratory for testicular GCT-derived ENTs that had previously undergone next-generation sequencing-based comprehensive genomic profiling during the course of clinical care. Clinicopathological and genomic data were centrally rereviewed. Here, we report the molecular features of 10 ENTs of testicular GCT origin. All tumors harbored gain of chromosome 12p, often with KRAS, CCND2, and KMD5A coamplification, supporting a germ cell origin. The tumors were microsatellite-stable and exhibited a low tumor mutational burden. Three tumors (30%) exhibited MYCN or MYC amplification with co-occurring inactivation of the p53 pathway via either TP53 mutations or MDM2 amplification in 2 tumors. Three additional tumors (30%) had activation of the PI3K pathway via PIK3CA and PIK3CG mutations or PIK3C2B amplification; 1 tumor with co-occurring CDK4 amplification. Gene rearrangements were detected in 3 tumors (30%), with novel BRD4::MAU2 and BCOR::CLIP2 fusions as well as an internal truncating ATRX rearrangement, respectively. In summary, ENTs arising from GCTs are molecularly heterogeneous; however, a large fraction of testicular ENTs could be stratified by 2 distinct sets of genetic alterations, including MYCN/MYC amplification with concurrent suppression of the p53 pathway, and activation of the PI3K pathway with co-occurring CDK4 amplification. Moreover, the novel gene fusions identified in a subset of testicular GCT-derived ENTs overlap with molecularly defined tumors of embryonic-type neuroectodermal features in the central nervous system, indicating the potential common driving events for tumorigenesis from different anatomical sites.
{"title":"Molecular Diversity of Embryonic-Type Neuroectodermal Tumors Arising From Testicular Germ Cell Tumors.","authors":"Yang Zong, Rongrong Huang, Mireille Bitar, Alexandra Drakaki, Liying Zhang, Douglas I Lin, Huihui Ye","doi":"10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100702","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100702","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Embryonic-type neuroectodermal tumors (ENTs) arising from testicular germ cell tumors (GCTs) are a relatively common type of somatic transformation in GCTs with poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options, particularly when patients develop disease recurrence or metastasis. Knowledge of key events driving this transformation is limited to the paucity of comprehensive genomic data. We performed a retrospective database search in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments- and College of American Pathologists-certified laboratory for testicular GCT-derived ENTs that had previously undergone next-generation sequencing-based comprehensive genomic profiling during the course of clinical care. Clinicopathological and genomic data were centrally rereviewed. Here, we report the molecular features of 10 ENTs of testicular GCT origin. All tumors harbored gain of chromosome 12p, often with KRAS, CCND2, and KMD5A coamplification, supporting a germ cell origin. The tumors were microsatellite-stable and exhibited a low tumor mutational burden. Three tumors (30%) exhibited MYCN or MYC amplification with co-occurring inactivation of the p53 pathway via either TP53 mutations or MDM2 amplification in 2 tumors. Three additional tumors (30%) had activation of the PI3K pathway via PIK3CA and PIK3CG mutations or PIK3C2B amplification; 1 tumor with co-occurring CDK4 amplification. Gene rearrangements were detected in 3 tumors (30%), with novel BRD4::MAU2 and BCOR::CLIP2 fusions as well as an internal truncating ATRX rearrangement, respectively. In summary, ENTs arising from GCTs are molecularly heterogeneous; however, a large fraction of testicular ENTs could be stratified by 2 distinct sets of genetic alterations, including MYCN/MYC amplification with concurrent suppression of the p53 pathway, and activation of the PI3K pathway with co-occurring CDK4 amplification. Moreover, the novel gene fusions identified in a subset of testicular GCT-derived ENTs overlap with molecularly defined tumors of embryonic-type neuroectodermal features in the central nervous system, indicating the potential common driving events for tumorigenesis from different anatomical sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":18706,"journal":{"name":"Modern Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"100702"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142896074","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-24DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100693
Gelareh Farshid, Jane Armes, Benjamin Dessauvagie, Amardeep Gilhotra, Beena Kumar, Hema Mahajan, Ewan Millar, Nirmala Pathmanathan, Cameron Snell
For 2 decades, the American Society of Clinial Oncology-College of American Pathologists human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing criteria have included 0 and 1+ scores, but this distinction was inconsequential. Now, based on the DESTINY Breast-04 Trial (DB-04) results, for patients with metastatic breast cancer it underpins eligibility for trastuzumab-deruxtecan treatment. Discerning 0 from 1+ immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining is challenging, as HER2 low is not a biologically distinct cancer subset, there are no reference standards or controls, and second-tier tests (eg, in situ hybridization) do not apply. Prior reports cast doubt on the reliability of pathologists' IHC scoring, with resulting treatment misalignments. With institutional review board approval, our group of 9 breast pathologists from 8 Australian laboratories had previously established HER2-low-focused scoring conventions, based on the American Society of Clinial Oncology-College of American Pathologists 2018 HER2 guidelines, and specifying common staining pitfalls. We reported the results of the first set of 60 breast cancers evaluated with these methods. After a 5-month washout, for the present validation study, we have compiled a second set of 64 HER2-negative invasive breast cancer core biopsies, all assessed with the Ventana 4B5 HER2 assay. We have each scored digitized images of HER2 IHC slides of the cases. Using the majority opinion as the target score, we have calculated our performance metrics. We have compared the results of our performance in set 1 and set 2 to assess the effectiveness of our approach and learning retention. The cases in this validation set included 40 (62.5%) HER2 low, 10 (17.2%) ultralow (UL), and 13 (18.8%) null cancers. Concordance was not achieved in 1 case. For distinguishing HER2 low from other cancers (UL and null combined) the mean values of our performance metrics were accuracy 89.58%, sensitivity 90.83%, specificity 87.50%, positive predictive value 95.63%, negative predictive value 83.59%, and Cohen kappa score 0.81. Comparing these results with our initial study, we have maintained our high level of performance across these parameters. Our mean kappa score is now in the excellent range for concordance. Maintaining high performance across a range of measures in 2 separate data sets validates the effectiveness of our HER2-low-focused scoring conventions. Having validated our approach, we will use these reference case sets with expert-level consensus scores for peer training and updating our national HER2 IHC external quality assurance program. In our ongoing studies, we are also assessing the performance of software algorithms to determine their suitability for the prescreening of HER2 IHC slides.
二十年来,ASCO CAP HER2检测标准包括0和1+分,但这种区别是无关紧要的。现在,基于DESTINY breast -04试验(DB-04)的结果,对于转移性乳腺癌患者,它支持T-DXd治疗的资格。区分0和1+ IHC染色具有挑战性,因为HER2低并不是生物学上独特的癌症亚群,没有参考标准或对照,也不适用二级检测。先前的报告对病理学家的IHC评分的可靠性表示怀疑,导致治疗错位。经IRB批准,我们来自8个澳大利亚实验室的9名乳腺病理学家小组先前根据ASCO CAP 2018 HER2指南建立了HER2低焦点评分惯例,并指定了常见的染色陷阱。我们报告了用这些方法评估的第一组60例乳腺癌的结果。在5个月的洗脱期后,对于目前的验证研究,我们编制了第二组64例HER2阴性的浸润性乳腺癌核心活检,所有活检均采用Ventana 4B5 HER2检测进行评估。我们分别对病例的HER2 IHC玻片的数字化图像进行了评分。使用多数意见作为目标分数,我们计算出了我们的性能指标。我们比较了第一组和第二组的表现结果,以评估我们的方法和学习保留的有效性。该验证集中的病例包括40例(62.5%)her2低,10例(17.2%)超低(UL)和13例(18.8%)零癌。1例未达到一致性。对于区分HER2低与其他癌症(UL和null合并),我们的性能指标的平均值为:准确性89.58%,敏感性90.83%,特异性87.50%,阳性预测值95.63%,阴性预测值83.59%,Cohen's kappa评分0.81。将这些结果与我们最初的研究结果进行比较,我们在这些参数中保持了高水平的性能。我们的平均卡帕评分现在处于一致性的优秀范围内。在两个独立的数据集中保持一系列指标的高性能,验证了我们的HER2低焦点评分惯例的有效性。在验证了我们的方法之后,我们将使用这些具有专家水平共识分数的参考案例集进行同行培训,并更新我们的国家HER2 IHC外部质量保证计划。在我们正在进行的研究中,我们也在评估软件算法的性能,以确定它们对HER2 IHC载玻片预筛选的适用性。
{"title":"Independent Validation of a HER2-Low Focused Immunohistochemistry Scoring System for Enhanced Pathologist Precision and Consistency.","authors":"Gelareh Farshid, Jane Armes, Benjamin Dessauvagie, Amardeep Gilhotra, Beena Kumar, Hema Mahajan, Ewan Millar, Nirmala Pathmanathan, Cameron Snell","doi":"10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100693","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100693","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For 2 decades, the American Society of Clinial Oncology-College of American Pathologists human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing criteria have included 0 and 1+ scores, but this distinction was inconsequential. Now, based on the DESTINY Breast-04 Trial (DB-04) results, for patients with metastatic breast cancer it underpins eligibility for trastuzumab-deruxtecan treatment. Discerning 0 from 1+ immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining is challenging, as HER2 low is not a biologically distinct cancer subset, there are no reference standards or controls, and second-tier tests (eg, in situ hybridization) do not apply. Prior reports cast doubt on the reliability of pathologists' IHC scoring, with resulting treatment misalignments. With institutional review board approval, our group of 9 breast pathologists from 8 Australian laboratories had previously established HER2-low-focused scoring conventions, based on the American Society of Clinial Oncology-College of American Pathologists 2018 HER2 guidelines, and specifying common staining pitfalls. We reported the results of the first set of 60 breast cancers evaluated with these methods. After a 5-month washout, for the present validation study, we have compiled a second set of 64 HER2-negative invasive breast cancer core biopsies, all assessed with the Ventana 4B5 HER2 assay. We have each scored digitized images of HER2 IHC slides of the cases. Using the majority opinion as the target score, we have calculated our performance metrics. We have compared the results of our performance in set 1 and set 2 to assess the effectiveness of our approach and learning retention. The cases in this validation set included 40 (62.5%) HER2 low, 10 (17.2%) ultralow (UL), and 13 (18.8%) null cancers. Concordance was not achieved in 1 case. For distinguishing HER2 low from other cancers (UL and null combined) the mean values of our performance metrics were accuracy 89.58%, sensitivity 90.83%, specificity 87.50%, positive predictive value 95.63%, negative predictive value 83.59%, and Cohen kappa score 0.81. Comparing these results with our initial study, we have maintained our high level of performance across these parameters. Our mean kappa score is now in the excellent range for concordance. Maintaining high performance across a range of measures in 2 separate data sets validates the effectiveness of our HER2-low-focused scoring conventions. Having validated our approach, we will use these reference case sets with expert-level consensus scores for peer training and updating our national HER2 IHC external quality assurance program. In our ongoing studies, we are also assessing the performance of software algorithms to determine their suitability for the prescreening of HER2 IHC slides.</p>","PeriodicalId":18706,"journal":{"name":"Modern Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"100693"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142895824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-19DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100692
Paula Toro, Ahmed Bakhshwin, Bassel Zein-Sabatto, Neha Khaitan, Lauren Duckworth, Ana Bennett, Sarah S Elsoukkary, Xuefeng Zhang, Sneha Govande, Emily C Zabor, David Liska, Ehsan Balagamwala, Daniela S Allende
Anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) incidence has increased, and treatment has shifted from surgery to chemoradiotherapy (CRT), with salvage abdominoperineal resection (APR) being reserved for persistent/recurrent cases. This study evaluates the utility of different Tumor Regression Scoring Systems (TRSS) in predicting survival in anal SCC patients, using pathologists' observations and digital pathology. Cases managed surgically from 2005 to 2019 were collected. Residual tumor was assessed by multiple methods (gross tumor size, largest focus of tumor on H&E slide, average of residual tumor in all submitted H&E slides, JES, Chirieac, Schneider, Hermann, CAP scoring system). Three expert pathologists individually estimated ("eyeballed") the residual tumor % based on residual tumor/tumor bed (single representative H&E slide). The QuPath software was used to measure tumor volume on the same slide. American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th staging, and outcome data were retrieved from electronic medical records. The study involved 48 participants, predominantly female (56%), with a median age of 57. Most were Caucasian. HPV-positive was present in 77% of those assessed (17/22). Initial treatment included chemoradiation (CRT), followed by APR (79%) or pelvic exenteration (21%). Complications (13%), persistent disease (33%), and recurrence (54%) led to surgical interventions. 51% had moderately differentiated SCC, whereas 42% were poorly differentiated. Lymphovascular invasion (44%), perineural invasion (38%), and lymph node metastasis (13%) were present. Distant metastasis was rare (2%). Median overall survival was 3.2 years. Positive margins (HR 4.12, 95% CI 1.83, 9.28) and larger tumor size (HR 1.02 95% CI 1.01, 1.03) were associated with an increased hazard of death. Most residual tumor measurement methods were not significantly associated with overall survival. Interobserver agreement (based on "eyeballing") was moderate (kappa 0.4). Computational pathology-based residual tumor percentage was the only method significantly associated with outcome, with each 10% increase in the residual tumor percentage corresponding to a 1.23-fold higher hazard death (95% CI 1.03, 1.46; p=0.024). This study highlights computational pathology's important role in predicting outcomes in anal SCC treated with CRT and surgery. Specifically, the computational assessment of the residual tumor percentage proves to be a strong predictor of overall survival, outperforming other established TRSS methods.
肛门鳞状细胞癌(SCC)的发病率已经增加,治疗已经从手术转向放化疗(CRT),保留腹会阴切除术(APR)用于持续/复发病例。本研究利用病理学家的观察和数字病理学,评估了不同肿瘤回归评分系统(TRSS)在预测肛门鳞状细胞癌患者生存方面的效用。收集2005 - 2019年手术处理病例。采用多种方法(肿瘤总大小、肿瘤在H&E切片上的最大病灶、所有提交的H&E切片中残余肿瘤的平均值、JES、Chirieac、Schneider、Hermann、CAP评分系统)评估残余肿瘤。三位病理学专家分别根据残留肿瘤/肿瘤床(单张代表性H&E切片)估算(“目测”)残留肿瘤%。使用QuPath软件测量同一张载玻片上的肿瘤体积。美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)第8期,结果数据从电子病历中检索。该研究涉及48名参与者,主要是女性(56%),中位年龄为57岁。大多数是白种人。77%的被评估者(17/22)存在hpv阳性。初始治疗包括放化疗(CRT),随后进行APR(79%)或盆腔切除(21%)。并发症(13%)、持续性疾病(33%)和复发(54%)导致手术干预。51%为中分化SCC, 42%为低分化SCC。存在淋巴血管侵犯(44%)、神经周围侵犯(38%)和淋巴结转移(13%)。远处转移罕见(2%)。中位总生存期为3.2年。阳性切缘(HR 4.12, 95% CI 1.83, 9.28)和较大的肿瘤大小(HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01, 1.03)与死亡风险增加相关。大多数残留肿瘤测量方法与总生存率无显著相关性。观察者间一致性(基于“眼球观察”)为中等(kappa 0.4)。基于计算病理学的残余肿瘤百分比是唯一与预后显著相关的方法,残余肿瘤百分比每增加10%对应的危险死亡增加1.23倍(95% CI 1.03, 1.46;p = 0.024)。本研究强调了计算病理学在预测肛门SCC CRT和手术治疗结果中的重要作用。具体来说,残余肿瘤百分比的计算评估被证明是总生存的一个强有力的预测指标,优于其他已建立的TRSS方法。
{"title":"Computational Pathology-Enabled Residual Tumor Estimation is a Prognostic Factor for Overall Survival in Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.","authors":"Paula Toro, Ahmed Bakhshwin, Bassel Zein-Sabatto, Neha Khaitan, Lauren Duckworth, Ana Bennett, Sarah S Elsoukkary, Xuefeng Zhang, Sneha Govande, Emily C Zabor, David Liska, Ehsan Balagamwala, Daniela S Allende","doi":"10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100692","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100692","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) incidence has increased, and treatment has shifted from surgery to chemoradiotherapy (CRT), with salvage abdominoperineal resection (APR) being reserved for persistent/recurrent cases. This study evaluates the utility of different Tumor Regression Scoring Systems (TRSS) in predicting survival in anal SCC patients, using pathologists' observations and digital pathology. Cases managed surgically from 2005 to 2019 were collected. Residual tumor was assessed by multiple methods (gross tumor size, largest focus of tumor on H&E slide, average of residual tumor in all submitted H&E slides, JES, Chirieac, Schneider, Hermann, CAP scoring system). Three expert pathologists individually estimated (\"eyeballed\") the residual tumor % based on residual tumor/tumor bed (single representative H&E slide). The QuPath software was used to measure tumor volume on the same slide. American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th staging, and outcome data were retrieved from electronic medical records. The study involved 48 participants, predominantly female (56%), with a median age of 57. Most were Caucasian. HPV-positive was present in 77% of those assessed (17/22). Initial treatment included chemoradiation (CRT), followed by APR (79%) or pelvic exenteration (21%). Complications (13%), persistent disease (33%), and recurrence (54%) led to surgical interventions. 51% had moderately differentiated SCC, whereas 42% were poorly differentiated. Lymphovascular invasion (44%), perineural invasion (38%), and lymph node metastasis (13%) were present. Distant metastasis was rare (2%). Median overall survival was 3.2 years. Positive margins (HR 4.12, 95% CI 1.83, 9.28) and larger tumor size (HR 1.02 95% CI 1.01, 1.03) were associated with an increased hazard of death. Most residual tumor measurement methods were not significantly associated with overall survival. Interobserver agreement (based on \"eyeballing\") was moderate (kappa 0.4). Computational pathology-based residual tumor percentage was the only method significantly associated with outcome, with each 10% increase in the residual tumor percentage corresponding to a 1.23-fold higher hazard death (95% CI 1.03, 1.46; p=0.024). This study highlights computational pathology's important role in predicting outcomes in anal SCC treated with CRT and surgery. Specifically, the computational assessment of the residual tumor percentage proves to be a strong predictor of overall survival, outperforming other established TRSS methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":18706,"journal":{"name":"Modern Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"100692"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142872514","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-18DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100691
Kshitij Ingale, Sun Hae Hong, Qiyuan Hu, Renyu Zhang, Bolesław L Osinski, Mina Khoshdeli, Josh Och, Kunal Nagpal, Martin C Stumpe, Rohan P Joshi
Molecular testing of tumor samples for targetable biomarkers is restricted by a lack of standardization, turnaround time, cost, and tissue availability across cancer types. Additionally, targetable alterations of low prevalence may not be tested in routine workflows. Algorithms that predict DNA alterations from routinely generated hematoxylin and eosin-stained images could prioritize samples for confirmatory molecular testing. Costs and the necessity of a large number of samples containing mutations limit approaches that train individual algorithms for each alteration. In this work, models were trained for simultaneous prediction of multiple DNA alterations from hematoxylin and eosin images using a multitask approach. Compared with biomarker-specific models, this approach performed better on average, with pronounced gains for rare mutations. The models reasonably generalized to independent temporal holdout, externally stained, and multisite The Cancer Genome Atlas test sets. Additionally, whole slide image embeddings derived using multitask models demonstrated strong performance in downstream tasks that were not a part of training. Overall, this is a promising approach to develop clinically useful algorithms that provide multiple actionable predictions from a single slide.
{"title":"Efficient and Generalizable Prediction of Molecular Alterations in Multiple-Cancer Cohorts Using Hematoxylin and Eosin Whole Slide Images.","authors":"Kshitij Ingale, Sun Hae Hong, Qiyuan Hu, Renyu Zhang, Bolesław L Osinski, Mina Khoshdeli, Josh Och, Kunal Nagpal, Martin C Stumpe, Rohan P Joshi","doi":"10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100691","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100691","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Molecular testing of tumor samples for targetable biomarkers is restricted by a lack of standardization, turnaround time, cost, and tissue availability across cancer types. Additionally, targetable alterations of low prevalence may not be tested in routine workflows. Algorithms that predict DNA alterations from routinely generated hematoxylin and eosin-stained images could prioritize samples for confirmatory molecular testing. Costs and the necessity of a large number of samples containing mutations limit approaches that train individual algorithms for each alteration. In this work, models were trained for simultaneous prediction of multiple DNA alterations from hematoxylin and eosin images using a multitask approach. Compared with biomarker-specific models, this approach performed better on average, with pronounced gains for rare mutations. The models reasonably generalized to independent temporal holdout, externally stained, and multisite The Cancer Genome Atlas test sets. Additionally, whole slide image embeddings derived using multitask models demonstrated strong performance in downstream tasks that were not a part of training. Overall, this is a promising approach to develop clinically useful algorithms that provide multiple actionable predictions from a single slide.</p>","PeriodicalId":18706,"journal":{"name":"Modern Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"100691"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142872517","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-16DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100689
Jan Hojný, Jan Hrudka, Zuzana Prouzová, Michaela Kendall Bártů, Eva Krkavcová, Jiří Dvořák, Romana Michálková, David Čapka, Nicolette Zavillová, Radoslav Matěj, Petr Waldauf
Penile squamous cell carcinoma (pSCC) represents an uncommon malignancy characterized by stagnant mortality, psychosexual distress, and a highly variable prognosis. Currently, the World Health Organization distinguishes between human papillomavirus (HPV)-related and HPV-independent pSCC. Recently, there has been an evolving line of research documenting the enrichment of HPV-independent pSCC with a high tumor mutational burden (TMB) and programmed death ligand-1 expression, as well as clusters of genes associated with HPV status. In this study, we conducted comprehensive next-generation sequencing DNA profiling of 146 pSCC samples using a panel consisting of 355 genes associated with tumors. This profiling was correlated with immunohistochemical markers and prognostic clinical data. A survival analysis of recurrent genomic events (found in ≥10 cases) was performed. TP53, CDKN2A, ATM, EPHA7, POT1, CHEK1, GRIN2A, and EGFR alterations were associated with significantly shortened overall survival in univariate and multivariate analysis. HPV positivity, diagnosed through both p16 immunohistochemistry and HPV DNA analysis, displayed no impact on survival but was associated with high-grade, lymphatic invasion, programmed death ligand-1 negativity/weak expression, and low TMB. FAT1, TP53, CDKN2A, CASP8, and HRAS were more often mutated in HPV-independent pSCC. In contrast, HPV-associated pSCCs were enriched by EPHA7, ATM, GRIN2A, and CHEK1 mutations. PIK3CA, FAT1, FBXW7, and KMT2D mutations were associated with high TMB. NOTCH1, TP53, CDKN2A, POT1, KMT2D, ATM, CHEK1, EPHA3, and EGFR alterations were related to adverse clinicopathologic signs, such as advanced stage, high tumor budding, and lymphovascular invasion. We detected 160 alterations with potential treatment implications, with 21.2% of samples showing alterations in the homologous recombination repair pathway. To the best of our knowledge, this study describes the largest cohort of pSCC with complex molecular pathologic, clinical, and prognostic analysis correlating with prognosis.
{"title":"Altered TP53, CDKN2A, ATM, EPHA7, POT1, CHEK1, GRIN2A, and EGFR Predict Shorter Survival in Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma.","authors":"Jan Hojný, Jan Hrudka, Zuzana Prouzová, Michaela Kendall Bártů, Eva Krkavcová, Jiří Dvořák, Romana Michálková, David Čapka, Nicolette Zavillová, Radoslav Matěj, Petr Waldauf","doi":"10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100689","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100689","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Penile squamous cell carcinoma (pSCC) represents an uncommon malignancy characterized by stagnant mortality, psychosexual distress, and a highly variable prognosis. Currently, the World Health Organization distinguishes between human papillomavirus (HPV)-related and HPV-independent pSCC. Recently, there has been an evolving line of research documenting the enrichment of HPV-independent pSCC with a high tumor mutational burden (TMB) and programmed death ligand-1 expression, as well as clusters of genes associated with HPV status. In this study, we conducted comprehensive next-generation sequencing DNA profiling of 146 pSCC samples using a panel consisting of 355 genes associated with tumors. This profiling was correlated with immunohistochemical markers and prognostic clinical data. A survival analysis of recurrent genomic events (found in ≥10 cases) was performed. TP53, CDKN2A, ATM, EPHA7, POT1, CHEK1, GRIN2A, and EGFR alterations were associated with significantly shortened overall survival in univariate and multivariate analysis. HPV positivity, diagnosed through both p16 immunohistochemistry and HPV DNA analysis, displayed no impact on survival but was associated with high-grade, lymphatic invasion, programmed death ligand-1 negativity/weak expression, and low TMB. FAT1, TP53, CDKN2A, CASP8, and HRAS were more often mutated in HPV-independent pSCC. In contrast, HPV-associated pSCCs were enriched by EPHA7, ATM, GRIN2A, and CHEK1 mutations. PIK3CA, FAT1, FBXW7, and KMT2D mutations were associated with high TMB. NOTCH1, TP53, CDKN2A, POT1, KMT2D, ATM, CHEK1, EPHA3, and EGFR alterations were related to adverse clinicopathologic signs, such as advanced stage, high tumor budding, and lymphovascular invasion. We detected 160 alterations with potential treatment implications, with 21.2% of samples showing alterations in the homologous recombination repair pathway. To the best of our knowledge, this study describes the largest cohort of pSCC with complex molecular pathologic, clinical, and prognostic analysis correlating with prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":18706,"journal":{"name":"Modern Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"100689"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142854726","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-16DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100686
Matthew Hanna, Liron Pantanowitz, Brian Jackson, Octavia Palmer, Shyam Visweswaran, Joshua Pantanowitz, Mustafa Deebajah, Hooman Rashidi
As artificial intelligence (AI) gains prominence in pathology and medicine, the ethical implications and potential biases within such integrated AI models will require careful scrutiny. Ethics and bias are important considerations in our practice settings, especially as increased number of machine learning (ML) systems are being integrated within our various medical domains. Such machine learning based systems, have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in specified tasks such as but not limited to image recognition, natural language processing, and predictive analytics. However, the potential bias that may exist within such AI-ML models can also inadvertently lead to unfair and potentially detrimental outcomes. The source of bias within such machine learning models can be due to numerous factors but can be typically put in three main buckets (data bias, development bias and interaction bias). These could be due to the training data, algorithmic bias, feature engineering and selection issues, clinical and institutional bias (i.e. practice variability), reporting bias, and temporal bias (i.e. changes in technology, clinical practice or disease patterns). Therefore despite the potential of these AI-ML applications, their deployment in our day to day practice also raises noteworthy ethical concerns. To address ethics and bias in medicine, a comprehensive evaluation process is required which will encompass all aspects such systems, from model development through clinical deployment. Addressing these biases is crucial to ensure that AI-ML systems remain fair, transparent, and beneficial to all. This review will discuss the relevant ethical and bias considerations in AI-ML specifically within the pathology and medical domain.
{"title":"Ethical and Bias Considerations in Artificial Intelligence (AI)/Machine Learning.","authors":"Matthew Hanna, Liron Pantanowitz, Brian Jackson, Octavia Palmer, Shyam Visweswaran, Joshua Pantanowitz, Mustafa Deebajah, Hooman Rashidi","doi":"10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100686","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100686","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As artificial intelligence (AI) gains prominence in pathology and medicine, the ethical implications and potential biases within such integrated AI models will require careful scrutiny. Ethics and bias are important considerations in our practice settings, especially as increased number of machine learning (ML) systems are being integrated within our various medical domains. Such machine learning based systems, have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in specified tasks such as but not limited to image recognition, natural language processing, and predictive analytics. However, the potential bias that may exist within such AI-ML models can also inadvertently lead to unfair and potentially detrimental outcomes. The source of bias within such machine learning models can be due to numerous factors but can be typically put in three main buckets (data bias, development bias and interaction bias). These could be due to the training data, algorithmic bias, feature engineering and selection issues, clinical and institutional bias (i.e. practice variability), reporting bias, and temporal bias (i.e. changes in technology, clinical practice or disease patterns). Therefore despite the potential of these AI-ML applications, their deployment in our day to day practice also raises noteworthy ethical concerns. To address ethics and bias in medicine, a comprehensive evaluation process is required which will encompass all aspects such systems, from model development through clinical deployment. Addressing these biases is crucial to ensure that AI-ML systems remain fair, transparent, and beneficial to all. This review will discuss the relevant ethical and bias considerations in AI-ML specifically within the pathology and medical domain.</p>","PeriodicalId":18706,"journal":{"name":"Modern Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"100686"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142854749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-16DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100690
Daan P C van Doorn, Rachid Tobal, Myrurgia A Abdul-Hamid, Pieter van Paassen, Sjoerd A M E G Timmermans
The syndromes of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) are associated with acute kidney injury and end-stage kidney disease. TMAs typically present with thrombocytopenia and microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (ie, systemic TMA). Kidney-limited TMA can occur, although often overlooked and undertreated. In this study, we studied the etiology and outcome of kidney-limited TMA. Patients with TMA on kidney biopsy, either systemic or kidney-limited, were recruited and classified as definite complement-mediated (C-)TMA (ie, ≥1 pathogenic complement gene variant), probable C-TMA (ie, massive ex vivo C5b9 formation without a pathogenic complement gene variant), and non (n)C-TMA (ie, normal ex vivo C5b9 formation). Morphologic features of TMA on kidney biopsy and their clinical correlates were studied. Patients were classified as definite C-TMA (N = 14; 18%), probable C-TMA (N = 21; 27%), or nC-TMA (N = 42; 55%), including 51 (66%) out of 77 patients with kidney-limited TMA. Patients with definite and probable C-TMA often presented with hemolysis (79% and 62% vs 34%; P = .007), glomerular thrombosis (79% and 76% vs 43%), a higher creatinine level (974 and 502 vs 280 μmol/L; P = .001), and a younger age (33 and 33 vs 40 years; P = .029) as compared with nC-TMA. Morphologic features neither defined etiology nor differed between systemic and kidney-limited TMA. Eculizumab improved kidney outcomes in patients with kidney-limited C-TMA but not in those with nC-TMA akin to patients with systemic C-TMA. Kidney outcomes were not affected by chronicity grading on kidney biopsy. Kidney-limited TMA is common in diverse TMAs, including C-TMA. A kidney biopsy is needed to detect TMA at the earliest possible stage of the disease. Morphology does not allow for the identification of etiology, and patients with kidney-limited TMA should therefore be screened for complement dysregulation, having a major impact on treatment and prognosis.
{"title":"Etiology and Outcomes of Kidney-Limited and Systemic Thrombotic Microangiopathy.","authors":"Daan P C van Doorn, Rachid Tobal, Myrurgia A Abdul-Hamid, Pieter van Paassen, Sjoerd A M E G Timmermans","doi":"10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100690","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100690","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The syndromes of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) are associated with acute kidney injury and end-stage kidney disease. TMAs typically present with thrombocytopenia and microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (ie, systemic TMA). Kidney-limited TMA can occur, although often overlooked and undertreated. In this study, we studied the etiology and outcome of kidney-limited TMA. Patients with TMA on kidney biopsy, either systemic or kidney-limited, were recruited and classified as definite complement-mediated (C-)TMA (ie, ≥1 pathogenic complement gene variant), probable C-TMA (ie, massive ex vivo C5b9 formation without a pathogenic complement gene variant), and non (n)C-TMA (ie, normal ex vivo C5b9 formation). Morphologic features of TMA on kidney biopsy and their clinical correlates were studied. Patients were classified as definite C-TMA (N = 14; 18%), probable C-TMA (N = 21; 27%), or nC-TMA (N = 42; 55%), including 51 (66%) out of 77 patients with kidney-limited TMA. Patients with definite and probable C-TMA often presented with hemolysis (79% and 62% vs 34%; P = .007), glomerular thrombosis (79% and 76% vs 43%), a higher creatinine level (974 and 502 vs 280 μmol/L; P = .001), and a younger age (33 and 33 vs 40 years; P = .029) as compared with nC-TMA. Morphologic features neither defined etiology nor differed between systemic and kidney-limited TMA. Eculizumab improved kidney outcomes in patients with kidney-limited C-TMA but not in those with nC-TMA akin to patients with systemic C-TMA. Kidney outcomes were not affected by chronicity grading on kidney biopsy. Kidney-limited TMA is common in diverse TMAs, including C-TMA. A kidney biopsy is needed to detect TMA at the earliest possible stage of the disease. Morphology does not allow for the identification of etiology, and patients with kidney-limited TMA should therefore be screened for complement dysregulation, having a major impact on treatment and prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":18706,"journal":{"name":"Modern Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"100690"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142854737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-15DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100687
Hooman H Rashidi, Joshua Pantanowitz, Alireza Chamanzar, Brandon Fennell, Yanshan Wang, Rama R Gullapalli, Ahmad Tafti, Mustafa Deebajah, Samer Albahra, Eric Glassy, Matthew G Hanna, Liron Pantanowitz
This review article builds upon the introductory piece in our 7-part series, delving deeper into the transformative potential of generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI) in pathology and medicine. The article explores the applications of Gen AI models in pathology and medicine, including the use of custom chatbots for diagnostic report generation, synthetic image synthesis for training new models, data set augmentation, hypothetical scenario generation for educational purposes, and the use of multimodal along with multiagent models. This article also provides an overview of the common categories within Gen AI models, discussing open-source and closed-source models, as well as specific examples of popular models such as GPT-4, Llama, Mistral, DALL-E, Stable Diffusion, and their associated frameworks (eg, transformers, generative adversarial networks, diffusion-based neural networks), along with their limitations and challenges, especially within the medical domain. We also review common libraries and tools that are currently deemed necessary to build and integrate such models. Finally, we look to the future, discussing the potential impact of Gen AI on health care, including benefits, challenges, and concerns related to privacy, bias, ethics, application programming interface costs, and security measures.
{"title":"Generative Artificial Intelligence in Pathology and Medicine: A Deeper Dive.","authors":"Hooman H Rashidi, Joshua Pantanowitz, Alireza Chamanzar, Brandon Fennell, Yanshan Wang, Rama R Gullapalli, Ahmad Tafti, Mustafa Deebajah, Samer Albahra, Eric Glassy, Matthew G Hanna, Liron Pantanowitz","doi":"10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100687","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100687","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review article builds upon the introductory piece in our 7-part series, delving deeper into the transformative potential of generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI) in pathology and medicine. The article explores the applications of Gen AI models in pathology and medicine, including the use of custom chatbots for diagnostic report generation, synthetic image synthesis for training new models, data set augmentation, hypothetical scenario generation for educational purposes, and the use of multimodal along with multiagent models. This article also provides an overview of the common categories within Gen AI models, discussing open-source and closed-source models, as well as specific examples of popular models such as GPT-4, Llama, Mistral, DALL-E, Stable Diffusion, and their associated frameworks (eg, transformers, generative adversarial networks, diffusion-based neural networks), along with their limitations and challenges, especially within the medical domain. We also review common libraries and tools that are currently deemed necessary to build and integrate such models. Finally, we look to the future, discussing the potential impact of Gen AI on health care, including benefits, challenges, and concerns related to privacy, bias, ethics, application programming interface costs, and security measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":18706,"journal":{"name":"Modern Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"100687"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142847012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}