Neurogastroenterology and Motility最新文献

Background: The knowledge and proficiency of primary care practitioners (PCPs) in diagnosing and managing irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) remain generally low and variable internationally. This variability is partly due to a lack of familiarity with the Rome Foundation diagnostic criteria and treatment guidelines for this condition.

Methods: We conducted an electronic survey of PCPs in the United States and nine European countries to assess their understanding of IBS pathophysiology; the use of Rome IV criteria in diagnosis, knowledge of and frequency in prescribing various recommended treatments; and the likelihood of referring patients with suspected IBS to subspecialists.

Results: Most PCPs in the United States and Europe perceive IBS as a diagnosis of exclusion rather than a definitive diagnosis. They also believe IBS is underdiagnosed in primary care and challenging to diagnose confidently. The majority of PCPs consider diet as a crucial component of IBS management. Notably, US PCPs reported greater confidence than their European counterparts in recommending dietary interventions such as increased dietary fiber, a low FODMAP diet, and gluten restriction. Conversely, both groups exhibited moderate to high confidence in recommending over-the-counter treatments. European PCPs showed greater confidence in treating IBS with antispasmodics and secretagogues, while US PCPs expressed greater confidence in prescribing neuromodulators. Additionally, US PCPs were more likely to refer patients with suspected IBS to a gastroenterologist, whereas both US and European PCPs showed similar referral patterns to dietitians and referred very few patients to mental health providers. Both US and European PCPs reported that IBS is moderately to extremely difficult to treat effectively and emphasized the importance of a strong and longitudinal doctor-patient relationship in managing the condition.

Conclusion: Despite the Rome Foundation recommendations and criteria to support a positive diagnosis of IBS, most PCPs still rely on exclusionary investigations such as endoscopy and a serologic workup, while a significant percentage suggest referring patients to gastroenterologists.

Background and aims: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and celiac disease (CeD) present with similar gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. DNA methylation-based biomarkers have not been investigated as diagnostic biomarkers to classify these disorders. We aimed to study DNA methylation profiles of IBS, IBD, CeD, and healthy controls (HC), develop machine learning-based classifiers, and identify associated gene ontology (GO) terms.

Methods: Genome-wide DNA methylation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 315 patients with IBS, IBD, CeD, and HC was measured using Illumina's 450K or EPIC arrays. A methylation dataset on 304 IBD and HC samples was used for external validation. Differential methylation was measured using general linear models. Classifiers were developed using penalized generalized linear models using double cross-validation controlling for confounders. Functional enrichment was assessed using GO.

Results: Three hundred and fifteen participants (148 IBS, 47 IBD, 34 CeD, and 86 HC) had DNA methylation data. IBS-IBD and IBD-CeD showed the highest number of differentially methylated CpG sites followed by IBD-HC, CeD-HC, and IBS-HC. IBS-associated genes were enriched in cell adhesion and neuronal pathways, while IBD- and CeD-associated markers were enriched in inflammation and MHC class II pathways, respectively (p < 0.05). Classification performances assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) for IBS-IBD, IBS-CeD, and IBD-CeD were 0.80 (95% CI = 0.7-0.87, p = 6.75E-10), 0.78 (95% CI = 0.68-0.86, p = 4.57E-10), and 0.73 (95% CI = 0.62-0.83, p = 0.03), respectively. The performance of IBD-HC was successfully validated using external data (AUC = 0.74 [95% CI = 68-0.80, p < 0.001]).

Conclusions: Blood-based DNA methylation biomarkers can potentially distinguish chronic GI disorders that present with similar symptoms. GO suggested functional significance of the classifiers in disease-specific pathology.

Background: Disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) predominate in women, but little is known about sex differences in menses-related or menopause symptoms.

Methods: Using data from the Rome Foundation Global Epidemiology Survey, we assessed Rome IV DGBI symptoms in individuals in 26 countries who met criteria for ≥ 1 of 5 DGBI: irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), functional dyspepsia (FD), functional constipation (FC), functional diarrhea (FDr), or functional bloating (FB). Participants included pre- and post-menopausal women with DGBI and age-matched men. Odds ratios estimated sex and age differences for symptom by sex or pre- vs. post-menopause in logistic regression; standardized mean difference (SMD) provided effect sizes.

Key results: 14,570 participants met criteria for ≥ 1 of the 5 DGBI. Women exceeded men in most symptoms. In FD, women stopped eating due to early satiety more than men (11.1 vs. 8.9 days/month, SMD 0.21). Symptoms were generally increased in premenopausal women and younger men compared to older counterparts; however, only premenopausal IBS, FD, and FC women reported increased constipation-associated symptoms. Compared to premenopausal women, postmenopausal women had increased accidental stool leakage in IBS and FDr, and increased digital manual maneuvers in FC (18% vs. 25% frequency, SMD -0.25). IBS and FD had the most menses-associated symptoms.

Conclusions and inferences: Women had higher symptom frequency across the 5 DGBI compared to men. Our findings suggest that premenopausal women have greater visceral perception than postmenopausal women, although increased outlet symptoms in postmenopausal women indicate greater anorectal/pelvic dysfunction. While age alone has some influence on symptoms, female sex hormones may also increase visceral perception.

Background: Autonomic dysfunction may contribute to symptom generation in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), possibly driven by psychological morbidity and activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Previous data are conflicting, perhaps due to lack of accounting for differential bowel patterns in IBS (constipation vs. diarrhea) or by diverse methodologies used to measure autonomic function. Our aim was to determine if autonomic response differed between IBS subtypes and healthy controls.

Methods: Forty female volunteers (20 IBS and 20 healthy) underwent comprehensive autonomic testing, fasting and postprandially, and in response to cold pressor and deep breathing challenges. Pulse transit time (PTT) and ultrasound measurements of intestinal blood flow were used as measures of systemic and local autonomic function, respectively. Outcomes were adjusted for baseline psychological comorbidities and gastric emptying (measured concurrently with scintigraphy).

Key results: Findings, confined to IBS patients with predominant constipation (IBS-C), included (1) lower fasting and a trend to larger postprandial increase in superior mesenteric artery end-diastolic velocity; (2) lower fasting PTT, suggesting higher sympathetic tone, but no difference in postprandial PTT change; and (3) attenuated increase in postprandial aortic peak systolic velocity. Response to systemic autonomic challenges did not differ between IBS and health. Some psychological factors mediated differences between groups in the fasting, but not postprandial, state.

Conclusions and inferences: IBS-C patients display systemic and local autonomic imbalance providing some support for recent therapies aimed at modulating autonomic state specifically in this patient group (e.g., acustimulation).

Introduction: We evaluated the level of achievement of the published recommendations of the European and American neurogastroenterology and motility (NGM) Societies, on the competence in managing NGM disorders in a European Country with regulated gastroenterology training program.

Methods: We conducted a nationwide survey to gastroenterologists in Spain. Information regarding demographics, training center characteristics, NGM training, self-reported interest, satisfaction with the Tier 1 skills recommended by the ANMS-ESNM, and perceived competence in the diagnosis and management of diseases in the spectrum of NGM was obtained.

Results: Surveys of 222 participants were analyzed (age 31 ± 3 years, 68% female, 77% specialists, 23% residents). During GI training, the average time spent on NGM was 4 (IQR 2-8) weeks, and 14% of participants reported they did not have any (0 weeks total) specific time dedicated to NGM in their training center. Ninety-two (41%) participants reported low satisfaction in the NGM skills obtained during training. There was a disparity in the skills acquired, being greatest for gastroesophageal reflux disease and lowest for colonic inertia (97% and 19% confident, respectively). Multiple regression analysis showed that the weeks of specific training in NGM was an independent factor associated with perceived satisfaction in the skills obtained (IC 95% 1.8-2.9, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Our data reveal a relevant deficit in training on NGM during gastroenterology fellowships and highlight the urgent need to extend and standardize the time allocated to learning NGM in the training programs, as training time correlates with satisfaction in the skills obtained.

Background: Few data are available on functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) findings specifically in obese patients. We aimed to evaluate FLIP metrics in obese patients who had not undergone bariatric surgery and in those who had sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). We also sought correlations of FLIP abnormalities with esophageal symptoms and HRM findings.

Methods: We identified obese patients who had FLIP performed during workups either for a first bariatric operation (surgery-naïve patients), or for surgical revision of SG and RYGB operations that resulted in inadequate weight loss. We recorded esophageal symptoms, HRM data, and FLIP metrics.

Key results: We identified 228 eligible patients (87 surgery-naïve, 90 SG, 51 RYGB). Dysphagia and chest pain were frequent symptoms in all groups. Median EGJ diameter and EGJ-DI were similar in surgery-naïve and postsurgical patients, but subgroup analysis of symptomatic patients with no HRM diagnosis revealed reduced EGJ opening in 12%. Abnormal FLIP response patterns were common (69% surgery-naïve, 74% SG, 65% RYGB) with higher ACR rates in SG (46.7% vs. 29.9%, p = 0.026) and RYGB (41.2% vs. 29.9%, p = 0.189) and lower SRCR rates in SG (11.1% vs. 24.1%, p = 0.021) and RYGB (5.9% vs. 24.1%, p = 0.006) compared to surgically naïve patients. There were no significant associations between FLIP contractile response patterns and symptoms or HRM diagnoses.

Conclusions: Dysphagia and chest pain are common in obese patients, and most obese patients (with or without bariatric surgery) have FLIP contractile response abnormalities that do not correlate with HRM findings. FLIP findings appear to be especially valuable in obese patients who have esophageal symptoms with no HRM diagnosis.

Background: Although different gastric shapes are encountered in gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES), it is not known whether gastric shape is related to gastric emptying (GE) or symptoms.

Aim: To investigate different stomach shapes observed during GES and examine their associations with GE, body weight, and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms.

Methods: This was a retrospective review of GES studies performed at our institution. Patients with prior gastric surgery were excluded. A classification of gastric shapes included: crescentic, J-shaped, reversed-L, cylindrical, and bag-like. Gastric shapes were correlated with GE, BMI, and GI symptoms using PAGI-SYM.

Results: 397 GES studies were reviewed (317 females, age 40.0 ± 20.3 years, BMI 27.8 ± 13.8 kg/m²). Gastric shapes were: 41.8% crescentic/comma-shaped, 34.0% J-shaped, 19.9% reversed L-shape, 2.8% cylindrical, and 1.5% bag-like. BMI was highest in crescentic/comma-shaped stomachs (30.1 ± 12.4 kg/m²) and lowest in bag-like stomachs (25.2 ± 9.9 kg/m²; p = 0.022). Delayed GE was most pronounced in bag-like stomachs (34.4 ± 33.1% retention at 4 h) and lowest in reversed-L shape (10.3 ± 15.6% retention at 4 h; p = 0.008). Regurgitation severity was greatest in bag-like stomachs (2.2 ± 1.5) compared to milder symptoms in reversed-L shape (1.3 ± 1.4; p = 0.029). Heartburn severity was increased in bag-like stomachs (2.3 ± 1.6) while patients with cylindrical stomachs reported least heartburn severity (1.1 ± 1.3; p = 0.11).

Conclusions: A classification system based on five gastric shapes observed during GES showed that crescent-shaped stomach was the most common shape and correlated with higher BMIs. Delayed GE was most pronounced in bag-like stomachs and lowest in reversed-L stomachs. Regurgitation and heartburn severity were greatest in bag-like stomachs with milder symptoms in reversed-L stomachs. Thus, gastric shape during GES is associated with gastric emptying, BMI, and symptom severity.

Background: Transanal irrigation is a well-established minimally invasive therapy that addresses symptoms of both constipation and incontinence. The therapy has been extended from just neurogenic bowel dysfunction patients to those with disorders of brain-gut interaction and postsurgical conditions.

Aim: To summarized the literature on transanal irrigation and update the contraindication profile.

Materials and methods: We undertook a literature review of transanal irrigation complications and outcomes.

Results: Initiation of therapy as part of a bowel care regime is becoming more common outside specialist centers. In addition, the concept of both high- and low-volume irrigation schedules has entered the treatment paradigm, and it is clear that there is a differing safety profile. We present an update from the previous long list of contraindications.

Discussion: We describe how optimizing long-term adherence depends on these factors in addition to a structured follow-up programme.

Conclusion: Transanal irrigation is an increasingly used therapy, with a good safety profile, further improved by the advent of low-volume irrigation options. Key to safe and effective usage of transanal irrigation is careful patient selection allied to tailored initial training of the patient.

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are associated with a high failure rate. Our uncontrolled feasibility study aimed determining the effect of a transcutaneous electrical stimulation system (TESS) on GERD symptoms and acid exposure time (AET).

Methods: Recruited patients with heartburn and regurgitation. During the first phase (one-week, run-in period, off-PPI's), patients completed symptom diaries and demographic questionnaires. Thereafter, all patients underwent gastroscopy with subsequent placement of a wireless esophageal pH capsule, off-PPI. Based on pH analysis in the first 24 h, only those with increased AET (percent total time pH < 4 above 6%) continued to the next phase. During that phase, patients were treated for up to 3 weeks with TESS and documented their symptoms. The Primary endpoint was the magnitude of reduction in GERD-related symptoms. The secondary endpoints were the magnitude of reduction of AET and DeMeester score, as compared with their baseline values.

Results: Included 31 patients and of those, 26 patients (42% females, aged 49 ± 15 years, mean BMI 25 ± 3 kg/m²) completed the first two phases of the study. At baseline, mean number of daily heartburn and regurgitation episodes was 2.55 ± 1.79 and 1.40 ± 1.73, respectively. Following TESS, mean number of daily heartburn and regurgitation episodes dropped to 0.77 ± 0.75 and 0.36 ± 0.8, respectively (p < 0.001). At base line, mean AET and DeMeester score were 12.4 ± 5.6 and 32.1 ± 12.7, respectively. Following TESS mean AET dropped to 6.0 ± 3.5 and DeMeester score dropped to 16.2 ± 8.2 (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: TESS is effective in reducing both symptoms and esophageal AET in GERD patients.