Background: There is no consensus on the management of incidental meningiomas. The literature on long-term growth dynamics is sparse and the natural history of these tumors remains to be illuminated.
Methods: We prospectively assessed long-term tumor growth dynamics and survival rates during active monitoring of 62 patients (45 female, mean age 63.9 years) harboring 68 tumors. Clinical and radiological data were obtained every 6 months for 2 years, annually until 5 years, then every second year.
Results: The natural progression of incidental meningiomas during 12 years of monitoring was growth (P < .001). However, mean growth decelerated at 1.5 years and became insignificant after 8 years. Self-limiting growth patterns were seen in 43 (63.2%) tumors, non-decelerating in 20 (29.4%) and 5 (7.4%) were inconclusive due to ≤ 2 measurements. Decelerating growth persisted once established. Within 5 years, 38 (97.4%) of 39 interventions were initiated. None developed symptoms prior to intervention. Large tumors (P < .001) involving venous sinuses (P = .039) grew most aggressively. Since inclusion 19 (30.6%) patients have died of unrelated causes and 2 (3%) from grade 2 meningiomas.
Conclusion: Active monitoring seems a safe and appropriate first-line management of incidental meningiomas. Intervention was avoided in > 40% with indolent tumors in this cohort. Treatment was not compromised by tumor growth. Clinical follow-up seems sufficient beyond 5 years if self-limiting growth is established. Steady or accelerating growth warrant monitoring until they reach a stable state or intervention is initiated.
背景:关于偶发性脑膜瘤的处理尚无共识。关于长期生长动力学的文献很少,这些肿瘤的自然历史仍有待阐明。方法:对62例68个肿瘤患者(女性45例,平均年龄63.9岁)在主动监测期间的长期肿瘤生长动态和生存率进行前瞻性评估。临床和放射学资料每6个月收集一次,持续2年,每年收集一次,直到5年,然后每2年收集一次。结果:12年监测期间偶发脑膜瘤的自然进展以生长最为迅猛(P P P = 0.039)。自纳入以来,19例(30.6%)患者死于无关原因,2例(3%)死于2级脑膜瘤。结论:主动监测是偶发脑膜瘤安全、适宜的一线治疗方法。在这个队列中,有40%的惰性肿瘤患者避免了干预。治疗不受肿瘤生长的影响。如果建立了自限性生长,5年以上的临床随访似乎是足够的。稳定或加速增长需要监测,直到它们达到稳定状态或开始干预。
{"title":"Growth dynamics of incidental meningiomas: A prospective long-term follow-up study.","authors":"Torbjørn Austveg Strømsnes, Morten Lund-Johansen, Geir Olve Skeie, Geir Egil Eide, Maziar Behbahani, Bente Sandvei Skeie","doi":"10.1093/nop/npac088","DOIUrl":"10.1093/nop/npac088","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is no consensus on the management of incidental meningiomas. The literature on long-term growth dynamics is sparse and the natural history of these tumors remains to be illuminated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively assessed long-term tumor growth dynamics and survival rates during active monitoring of 62 patients (45 female, mean age 63.9 years) harboring 68 tumors. Clinical and radiological data were obtained every 6 months for 2 years, annually until 5 years, then every second year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The natural progression of incidental meningiomas during 12 years of monitoring was growth (<i>P</i> < .001). However, mean growth decelerated at 1.5 years and became insignificant after 8 years. Self-limiting growth patterns were seen in 43 (63.2%) tumors, non-decelerating in 20 (29.4%) and 5 (7.4%) were inconclusive due to ≤ 2 measurements. Decelerating growth persisted once established. Within 5 years, 38 (97.4%) of 39 interventions were initiated. None developed symptoms prior to intervention. Large tumors (<i>P</i> < .001) involving venous sinuses (<i>P</i> = .039) grew most aggressively. Since inclusion 19 (30.6%) patients have died of unrelated causes and 2 (3%) from grade 2 meningiomas.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Active monitoring seems a safe and appropriate first-line management of incidental meningiomas. Intervention was avoided in > 40% with indolent tumors in this cohort. Treatment was not compromised by tumor growth. Clinical follow-up seems sufficient beyond 5 years if self-limiting growth is established. Steady or accelerating growth warrant monitoring until they reach a stable state or intervention is initiated.</p>","PeriodicalId":19234,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology practice","volume":"10 3","pages":"238-248"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2022-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10180371/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9530412","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-11-11eCollection Date: 2023-02-01DOI: 10.1093/nop/npac092
Raoull Hoogendijk, Pieter Wesseling
{"title":"Registration of molecular markers in population-based cancer registries: Hopes and hurdles.","authors":"Raoull Hoogendijk, Pieter Wesseling","doi":"10.1093/nop/npac092","DOIUrl":"10.1093/nop/npac092","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19234,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology practice","volume":"10 1","pages":"3-4"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2022-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9837767/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9116983","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-11-07eCollection Date: 2023-04-01DOI: 10.1093/nop/npac090
Sameera Ramjan, Cara Levitch, Stephen Sands, Soo Young Kim, Marie Barnett, Jesse Bledsoe, Alice Ann Holland
Background: Executive and social functioning difficulty is well established in pediatric brain tumor survivors. Few studies have compared posterior fossa (PF) tumor survivors in comparison to their peers. The relationship between attention, processing speed, working memory, fatigue, and executive and social functioning was investigated to better understand the factors that impact executive and social functioning in PF tumor populations.
Methods: Sixteen medulloblastomas, 9 low-grade astrocytomas (LGAs), and 17 healthy controls recruited from 4 sites completed measures of working memory and processing speed, and self-reported fatigue. One parent completed questionnaires on executive and social functioning.
Results: There were no significant differences among all 3 groups on parent-reported executive and social functioning; of note, parents of LGA survivors expressed greater concerns regarding behavioral and cognitive regulation than did parents of medulloblastoma survivors and healthy controls. Parent-reported attention was related to parent-reported emotion, behavior, and cognitive regulation. Worse self-reported fatigue was associated with greater emotional dysregulation for the 2 PF tumor groups.
Conclusions: Parents of PF tumor survivors described their children as performing similarly to their peers in most facets of executive and social functioning. While LGA survivors are traditionally thought to have more favorable outcomes, our finding of parent-reported executive functioning concerns to be worse for this group highlights the importance of long-term follow-up for all PF tumor survivors. Additionally, significant effects of attention on aspects of executive functioning in PF tumor survivors may inform current clinical practice and the future development of more effective interventions.
{"title":"Executive and social functioning in pediatric posterior fossa tumor survivors and healthy controls.","authors":"Sameera Ramjan, Cara Levitch, Stephen Sands, Soo Young Kim, Marie Barnett, Jesse Bledsoe, Alice Ann Holland","doi":"10.1093/nop/npac090","DOIUrl":"10.1093/nop/npac090","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Executive and social functioning difficulty is well established in pediatric brain tumor survivors. Few studies have compared posterior fossa (PF) tumor survivors in comparison to their peers. The relationship between attention, processing speed, working memory, fatigue, and executive and social functioning was investigated to better understand the factors that impact executive and social functioning in PF tumor populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixteen medulloblastomas, 9 low-grade astrocytomas (LGAs), and 17 healthy controls recruited from 4 sites completed measures of working memory and processing speed, and self-reported fatigue. One parent completed questionnaires on executive and social functioning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences among all 3 groups on parent-reported executive and social functioning; of note, parents of LGA survivors expressed greater concerns regarding behavioral and cognitive regulation than did parents of medulloblastoma survivors and healthy controls. Parent-reported attention was related to parent-reported emotion, behavior, and cognitive regulation. Worse self-reported fatigue was associated with greater emotional dysregulation for the 2 PF tumor groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Parents of PF tumor survivors described their children as performing similarly to their peers in most facets of executive and social functioning. While LGA survivors are traditionally thought to have more favorable outcomes, our finding of parent-reported executive functioning concerns to be worse for this group highlights the importance of long-term follow-up for all PF tumor survivors. Additionally, significant effects of attention on aspects of executive functioning in PF tumor survivors may inform current clinical practice and the future development of more effective interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19234,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology practice","volume":"10 2","pages":"152-161"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10037940/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9546595","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-11-05eCollection Date: 2023-02-01DOI: 10.1093/nop/npac091
Pim B van der Meer, Johan A F Koekkoek
{"title":"Valproic acid in glioma: Will the anticancer issue ever be solved?","authors":"Pim B van der Meer, Johan A F Koekkoek","doi":"10.1093/nop/npac091","DOIUrl":"10.1093/nop/npac091","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19234,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology practice","volume":"10 1","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2022-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9837768/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9116981","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-26eCollection Date: 2023-02-01DOI: 10.1093/nop/npac083
Antonio Di Ieva
{"title":"Debunking the debulking in glioma surgery.","authors":"Antonio Di Ieva","doi":"10.1093/nop/npac083","DOIUrl":"10.1093/nop/npac083","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19234,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology practice","volume":"10 1","pages":"104-105"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2022-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9837766/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9116985","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-25eCollection Date: 2023-04-01DOI: 10.1093/nop/npac085
Anne Sophie L Helligsoe, Louise T Henriksen, Line Kenborg, Yasmin Lassen-Ramshad, Lisa M Wu, Jeanette F Winther, Henrik Hasle, Ali Amidi
Background: Childhood brain tumor survivors are at high risk of late effects, especially neurocognitive impairment. Limited data are available examining neurocognitive function and associations with quality of life (QoL) in childhood brain tumor survivors. Our aim was to examine neurocognitive function in childhood brain tumor survivors, and associations with QoL and symptom burden.
Methods: Five-year survivors of brain tumors over the age of 15 were identified in the Danish Childhood Cancer Registry (n = 423). Eligible and consenting participants completed neuropsychological tests and questionnaires assessing QoL, insomnia, fatigue, anxiety, and depression. Survivors treated with radiation (n = 59) were statistically compared with survivors not treated with radiation (n = 102).
Results: In total, 170 survivors participated (40.2% participation rate). Sixty-six percent of the survivors who completed neurocognitive tests (n = 161) exhibited overall neurocognitive impairment. Survivors treated with radiation, especially whole-brain irradiation, exhibited poorer neurocognitive outcomes than survivors not treated with radiation. Neurocognitive outcomes for survivors treated with surgery were below normative expectations. Furthermore, a number of survivors experienced significant fatigue (40%), anxiety (23%), insomnia (13%), and/or depression (6%). Survivors treated with radiation reported lower quality of life (QoL) and higher symptom burden scores than survivors not treated with radiation; particularly in physical functioning, and social functioning with symptoms of fatigue. Neurocognitive impairment was not associated with QoL or symptom burden.
Conclusions: In this study, a majority of the childhood brain tumor survivors experienced neurocognitive impairment, reduced QoL, and high symptom burden. Although not associated with each other, it is apparent that childhood brain tumor survivors experience not only neurocognitive dysfunction but may also experience QoL impairments and significant symptom burden.
{"title":"Neurocognitive function and health-related quality of life in a nationwide cohort of long-term childhood brain tumor survivors.","authors":"Anne Sophie L Helligsoe, Louise T Henriksen, Line Kenborg, Yasmin Lassen-Ramshad, Lisa M Wu, Jeanette F Winther, Henrik Hasle, Ali Amidi","doi":"10.1093/nop/npac085","DOIUrl":"10.1093/nop/npac085","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Childhood brain tumor survivors are at high risk of late effects, especially neurocognitive impairment. Limited data are available examining neurocognitive function and associations with quality of life (QoL) in childhood brain tumor survivors. Our aim was to examine neurocognitive function in childhood brain tumor survivors, and associations with QoL and symptom burden.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five-year survivors of brain tumors over the age of 15 were identified in the Danish Childhood Cancer Registry (<i>n</i> = 423). Eligible and consenting participants completed neuropsychological tests and questionnaires assessing QoL, insomnia, fatigue, anxiety, and depression. Survivors treated with radiation (<i>n</i> = 59) were statistically compared with survivors not treated with radiation (<i>n</i> = 102).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 170 survivors participated (40.2% participation rate). Sixty-six percent of the survivors who completed neurocognitive tests (<i>n</i> = 161) exhibited overall neurocognitive impairment. Survivors treated with radiation, especially whole-brain irradiation, exhibited poorer neurocognitive outcomes than survivors not treated with radiation. Neurocognitive outcomes for survivors treated with surgery were below normative expectations. Furthermore, a number of survivors experienced significant fatigue (40%), anxiety (23%), insomnia (13%), and/or depression (6%). Survivors treated with radiation reported lower quality of life (QoL) and higher symptom burden scores than survivors not treated with radiation; particularly in physical functioning, and social functioning with symptoms of fatigue. Neurocognitive impairment was not associated with QoL or symptom burden.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, a majority of the childhood brain tumor survivors experienced neurocognitive impairment, reduced QoL, and high symptom burden. Although not associated with each other, it is apparent that childhood brain tumor survivors experience not only neurocognitive dysfunction but may also experience QoL impairments and significant symptom burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":19234,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology practice","volume":"10 2","pages":"140-151"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2022-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10037941/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9546594","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-22eCollection Date: 2023-04-01DOI: 10.1093/nop/npac087
Alipi V Bonm, Anthony Menghini, Caroline E Drolet, Jerome J Graber
Background: Most patients with primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) achieve durable remission whereas a minority die in the first year. Sarcopenia is a powerful predictor of mortality in the brain and systemic cancers. Temporalis muscle thickness (TMT) is a validated radiographic measure of sarcopenia. We hypothesized that patients with thin TMT at diagnosis would have early progression and short survival.
Methods: Two blinded operators retrospectively measured TMT in 99 consecutive brain MRIs from untreated patients with PCNSL.
Results: We generated a receiver operator characteristic curve and chose a single threshold defining thin TMT in all patients as <5.65 mm, at which specificity and sensitivity for 1-year progression were 98.4% and 29.7% and for 1-year mortality were 97.4% and 43.5% respectively. Those with thin TMT were both more likely to progress (P < .001) and had higher rates of mortality (P < .001). These effects were independent of the effect of age, sex, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status in a cox regression. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center score did not predict progression-free survival or overall survival as well as TMT. Patients with thin TMT received fewer cycles of high-dose methotrexate and were less likely to receive consolidation but neither variable could be included in the Cox regression due to violation of the proportional hazards assumption.
Conclusions: We conclude that PCNSL patients with thin TMT are at high risk for early relapse and short survival. Future trials should stratify patients by TMT to avoid confounding.
{"title":"Temporalis muscle thickness predicts early relapse and short survival in primary CNS lymphoma.","authors":"Alipi V Bonm, Anthony Menghini, Caroline E Drolet, Jerome J Graber","doi":"10.1093/nop/npac087","DOIUrl":"10.1093/nop/npac087","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most patients with primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) achieve durable remission whereas a minority die in the first year. Sarcopenia is a powerful predictor of mortality in the brain and systemic cancers. Temporalis muscle thickness (TMT) is a validated radiographic measure of sarcopenia. We hypothesized that patients with thin TMT at diagnosis would have early progression and short survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two blinded operators retrospectively measured TMT in 99 consecutive brain MRIs from untreated patients with PCNSL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We generated a receiver operator characteristic curve and chose a single threshold defining thin TMT in all patients as <5.65 mm, at which specificity and sensitivity for 1-year progression were 98.4% and 29.7% and for 1-year mortality were 97.4% and 43.5% respectively. Those with thin TMT were both more likely to progress (<i>P</i> < .001) and had higher rates of mortality (<i>P</i> < .001). These effects were independent of the effect of age, sex, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status in a cox regression. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center score did not predict progression-free survival or overall survival as well as TMT. Patients with thin TMT received fewer cycles of high-dose methotrexate and were less likely to receive consolidation but neither variable could be included in the Cox regression due to violation of the proportional hazards assumption.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We conclude that PCNSL patients with thin TMT are at high risk for early relapse and short survival. Future trials should stratify patients by TMT to avoid confounding.</p>","PeriodicalId":19234,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology practice","volume":"10 2","pages":"162-168"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2022-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10037939/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9561118","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-14eCollection Date: 2023-06-01DOI: 10.1093/nop/npac086
Alasdair G Rooney, William Hewins, Amie Walker, Mairi Mackinnon, Lisa Withington, Sara Robson, Claire Torrens, Lisa E M Hopcroft, Antony Clark, Garry Anderson, Helen Bulbeck, Joanna Dunlop, Michelle Welsh, Aimee Dyson, Julie Emerson, Carol Cochrane, Robert Hill, Jade Carruthers, Julia Day, David Gillespie, Christopher Hewitt, Emanuela Molinari, Mary Wells, Catherine McBain, Anthony J Chalmers, Robin Grant
Background: There are no effective treatments for brain tumor-related fatigue. We studied the feasibility of two novel lifestyle coaching interventions in fatigued brain tumor patients.
Methods: This phase I/feasibility multi-center RCT recruited patients with a clinically stable primary brain tumor and significant fatigue (mean Brief Fatigue Inventory [BFI] score ≥ 4/10). Participants were randomized in a 1-1-1 allocation ratio to: Control (usual care); Health Coaching ("HC", an eight-week program targeting lifestyle behaviors); or HC plus Activation Coaching ("HC + AC", further targeting self-efficacy). The primary outcome was feasibility of recruitment and retention. Secondary outcomes were intervention acceptability, which was evaluated via qualitative interview, and safety. Exploratory quantitative outcomes were measured at baseline (T0), post-interventions (T1, 10 weeks), and endpoint (T2, 16 weeks).
Results: n = 46 fatigued brain tumor patients (T0 BFI mean = 6.8/10) were recruited and 34 were retained to endpoint, establishing feasibility. Engagement with interventions was sustained over time. Qualitative interviews (n = 21) suggested that coaching interventions were broadly acceptable, although mediated by participant outlook and prior lifestyle. Coaching led to significant improvements in fatigue (improvement in BFI versus control at T1: HC=2.2 points [95% CI 0.6, 3.8], HC + AC = 1.8 [0.1, 3.4], Cohen's d [HC] = 1.9; improvement in FACIT-Fatigue: HC = 4.8 points [-3.7, 13.3]; HC + AC = 12 [3.5, 20.5], d [HC and AC] = 0.9). Coaching also improved depressive and mental health outcomes. Modeling suggested a potential limiting effect of higher baseline depressive symptoms.
Conclusions: Lifestyle coaching interventions are feasible to deliver to fatigued brain tumor patients. They were manageable, acceptable, and safe, with preliminary evidence of benefit on fatigue and mental health outcomes. Larger trials of efficacy are justified.
背景:对于脑肿瘤相关的疲劳,目前尚无有效的治疗方法。我们研究了两种新型生活方式指导干预措施对疲劳性脑肿瘤患者的可行性:这项 I 期/可行性多中心 RCT 研究招募了临床稳定的原发性脑肿瘤患者和明显疲劳的患者(平均简短疲劳量表 [BFI] 评分≥ 4/10)。参与者按 1-1-1 分配比例随机分配到以下项目中:对照组(常规护理);健康指导("HC",针对生活方式行为的八周计划);或健康指导加激活指导("HC + AC",进一步针对自我效能)。主要结果是招募和保留的可行性。次要结果是干预的可接受性(通过定性访谈进行评估)和安全性。在基线(T0)、干预后(T1,10 周)和终点(T2,16 周)测量了探索性定量结果。结果:共招募了 46 名疲劳型脑肿瘤患者(T0 BFI 平均值 = 6.8/10),其中 34 人保留至终点,从而确立了可行性。随着时间的推移,患者对干预措施的参与度持续上升。定性访谈(n = 21)表明,尽管受参与者的前景和先前生活方式的影响,但教练干预还是被广泛接受。辅导显著改善了疲劳状况(在 T1 阶段,BFI 与对照组相比有所改善:HC = 2.2 分 [95% CI 0.6, 3.8],HC + AC = 1.8 [0.1, 3.4],Cohen's d [HC] = 1.9;FACIT-疲劳状况有所改善:HC = 4.8 分 [-3.7, 13.3];HC + AC = 12 [3.5, 20.5],d [HC and AC] = 0.9)。辅导也改善了抑郁和心理健康结果。建模表明,基线抑郁症状较高可能会产生限制作用:生活方式指导干预对疲劳的脑肿瘤患者是可行的。结论:对疲劳的脑肿瘤患者进行生活方式指导干预是可行的,这些干预是可管理、可接受和安全的,有初步证据表明对疲劳和心理健康结果有益。有理由进行更大规模的疗效试验。
{"title":"Lifestyle coaching is feasible in fatigued brain tumor patients: A phase I/feasibility, multi-center, mixed-methods randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Alasdair G Rooney, William Hewins, Amie Walker, Mairi Mackinnon, Lisa Withington, Sara Robson, Claire Torrens, Lisa E M Hopcroft, Antony Clark, Garry Anderson, Helen Bulbeck, Joanna Dunlop, Michelle Welsh, Aimee Dyson, Julie Emerson, Carol Cochrane, Robert Hill, Jade Carruthers, Julia Day, David Gillespie, Christopher Hewitt, Emanuela Molinari, Mary Wells, Catherine McBain, Anthony J Chalmers, Robin Grant","doi":"10.1093/nop/npac086","DOIUrl":"10.1093/nop/npac086","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are no effective treatments for brain tumor-related fatigue. We studied the feasibility of two novel lifestyle coaching interventions in fatigued brain tumor patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This phase I/feasibility multi-center RCT recruited patients with a clinically stable primary brain tumor and significant fatigue (mean Brief Fatigue Inventory [BFI] score ≥ 4/10). Participants were randomized in a 1-1-1 allocation ratio to: Control (usual care); Health Coaching (\"HC\", an eight-week program targeting lifestyle behaviors); or HC plus Activation Coaching (\"HC + AC\", further targeting self-efficacy). The primary outcome was feasibility of recruitment and retention. Secondary outcomes were intervention acceptability, which was evaluated via qualitative interview, and safety. Exploratory quantitative outcomes were measured at baseline (T0), post-interventions (T1, 10 weeks), and endpoint (T2, 16 weeks).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><i>n</i> = 46 fatigued brain tumor patients (T0 BFI mean = 6.8/10) were recruited and 34 were retained to endpoint, establishing feasibility. Engagement with interventions was sustained over time. Qualitative interviews (<i>n</i> = 21) suggested that coaching interventions were broadly acceptable, although mediated by participant outlook and prior lifestyle. Coaching led to significant improvements in fatigue (improvement in BFI versus control at T1: HC=2.2 points [95% CI 0.6, 3.8], HC + AC = 1.8 [0.1, 3.4], Cohen's <i>d</i> [HC] = 1.9; improvement in FACIT-Fatigue: HC = 4.8 points [-3.7, 13.3]; HC + AC = 12 [3.5, 20.5], <i>d</i> [HC and AC] = 0.9). Coaching also improved depressive and mental health outcomes. Modeling suggested a potential limiting effect of higher baseline depressive symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lifestyle coaching interventions are feasible to deliver to fatigued brain tumor patients. They were manageable, acceptable, and safe, with preliminary evidence of benefit on fatigue and mental health outcomes. Larger trials of efficacy are justified.</p>","PeriodicalId":19234,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology practice","volume":"10 3","pages":"249-260"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2022-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10180387/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9530407","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-07eCollection Date: 2023-02-01DOI: 10.1093/nop/npac079
Corey Neff, Gino Cioffi, Kristin Waite, Carol Kruchko, Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan, Quinn T Ostrom, J Bryan Iorgulescu
Background: A newly developed brain molecular marker (BMM) data item was implemented by US cancer registries for individuals diagnosed with brain tumors in 2018-including IDH and 1p/19q-co-deletion statuses for adult-type diffuse gliomas. We thus investigated the testing/reporting completeness of BMM in the United States.
Methods: Cases of histopathologically confirmed glioblastoma, astrocytoma, and oligodendroglioma diagnosed in 2018 were identified in the National Cancer Database. Adjusted odds ratios (ORadj) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of BMM testing/reporting were evaluated for association with the selected patient, treatment, and facility-level characteristics using multivariable logistic regression. As a secondary analysis, predictors of MGMT promoter methylation testing/reporting among IDH-wildtype glioblastoma individuals were assessed. Key limitations of the BMM data item were that it did not include any details regarding testing technique or assay type and could not distinguish between a lack of testing and a lack of cancer registry reporting of testing results.
Results: Among 8306 histopathologically diagnosed adult-type diffuse gliomas nationally, overall BMM testing/reporting completeness was 81.1%. Compared to biopsy-only cases, odds of testing/reporting increased for subtotal (ORadj= 1.38 [95% CI: 1.20-1.59], P < .001) and gross total resection (ORadj=1.50 [95% CI: 1.31-1.72], P < .001). Furthermore, the odds were lowest at community centers (hospitals (67.3%; ORadj=0.35 [95% CI: 0.26-0.46], P < .001) and highest at academic/NCI-designated comprehensive cancer centers (85.4%; referent). By geographical location, BMM testing/reporting completeness ranged from a high of 86.8% at New England (referent) to a low of 76.0 % in the West South Central region (ORadj=0.57 [95% CI: 0.42-0.78]; P < .001). Extent of resection, Commission-on-Cancer facility type, and facility location were additionally significant predictors of MGMT testing/reporting among IDH-wildtype glioblastoma cases.
Conclusions: Initial BMM testing/reporting completeness for individuals with adult-type diffuse gliomas in the United States was promising, although patterns varied by hospital attributes and extent of resection.
{"title":"Molecular marker testing and reporting completeness for adult-type diffuse gliomas in the United States.","authors":"Corey Neff, Gino Cioffi, Kristin Waite, Carol Kruchko, Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan, Quinn T Ostrom, J Bryan Iorgulescu","doi":"10.1093/nop/npac079","DOIUrl":"10.1093/nop/npac079","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A newly developed brain molecular marker (BMM) data item was implemented by US cancer registries for individuals diagnosed with brain tumors in 2018-including IDH and 1p/19q-co-deletion statuses for adult-type diffuse gliomas. We thus investigated the testing/reporting completeness of BMM in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cases of histopathologically confirmed glioblastoma, astrocytoma, and oligodendroglioma diagnosed in 2018 were identified in the National Cancer Database. Adjusted odds ratios (OR<sub>adj</sub>) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of BMM testing/reporting were evaluated for association with the selected patient, treatment, and facility-level characteristics using multivariable logistic regression. As a secondary analysis, predictors of <i>MGMT</i> promoter methylation testing/reporting among IDH-wildtype glioblastoma individuals were assessed. Key limitations of the BMM data item were that it did not include any details regarding testing technique or assay type and could not distinguish between a lack of testing and a lack of cancer registry reporting of testing results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 8306 histopathologically diagnosed adult-type diffuse gliomas nationally, overall BMM testing/reporting completeness was 81.1%. Compared to biopsy-only cases, odds of testing/reporting increased for subtotal (OR<sub>adj</sub>= 1.38 [95% CI: 1.20-1.59], <i>P</i> < .001) and gross total resection (OR<sub>adj</sub>=1.50 [95% CI: 1.31-1.72], <i>P</i> < .001). Furthermore, the odds were lowest at community centers (hospitals (67.3%; OR<sub>adj</sub>=0.35 [95% CI: 0.26-0.46], <i>P</i> < .001) and highest at academic/NCI-designated comprehensive cancer centers (85.4%; referent). By geographical location, BMM testing/reporting completeness ranged from a high of 86.8% at New England (referent) to a low of 76.0 % in the West South Central region (OR<sub>adj</sub>=0.57 [95% CI: 0.42-0.78]; <i>P</i> < .001). Extent of resection, Commission-on-Cancer facility type, and facility location were additionally significant predictors of <i>MGMT</i> testing/reporting among IDH-wildtype glioblastoma cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Initial BMM testing/reporting completeness for individuals with adult-type diffuse gliomas in the United States was promising, although patterns varied by hospital attributes and extent of resection.</p>","PeriodicalId":19234,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology practice","volume":"10 1","pages":"24-33"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2022-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9837780/pdf/npac079.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9116984","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: This study sought to evaluate survival of pediatric and adolescent patients with central nervous system (CNS) cancer in southern Israel, outline disparities between ethnic and socioeconomic groups (Bedouin Arabs compared to Jews) and evaluate the role of socioeconomic status (SES) in ethnic disparities.
Methods: A retrospective study was conducted among 91 patients aged one to 20 years, who were diagnosed with CNS tumors between 2001 and 2017, and followed-up through 2020. Ethnic differences in survival were measured by age, sex, stage, histology and SES. One and 3-year survival rates were calculated. Multivariable regression analysis was used to estimate adjusted ethnic differences in survival rates.
Results: Ethnic differences in survival existed within all studied variables. All Bedouin patients lived in low SES settlements (All Bedouin settlement in Southern Israel are ranked in lower socioeconomic deciles). Twenty-eight patients had medulloblastoma. Seven (25%) presented with leptomeningeal disease or distant metastases. Medulloblastoma molecular subgroups were not assessed for logistic reasons. Three-year overall survival of Bedouins was 50% compared to 92.3% for Jews. Adjusted risk of death at 3 years was significantly higher for Bedouin patients (aHR 3.36, 95% CI 1.41-7.98, P = .006).
Conclusions: We conclude that Bedouin children with CNS tumors have significantly lower survival rates compared to Jewish children, and SES seems to play a major part in these disparities. Factors influencing these disparities should be addressed and public health interventions to eliminate these disparities should be developed.
背景:本研究旨在评估以色列南部儿童和青少年中枢神经系统(CNS)癌症患者的生存率,概述种族和社会经济群体之间的差异(贝都因阿拉伯人与犹太人的比较),并评估社会经济地位(SES)在种族差异中的作用。方法:对2001年至2017年间诊断为中枢神经系统肿瘤的91例1 ~ 20岁患者进行回顾性研究,随访至2020年。种族间的生存差异通过年龄、性别、分期、组织学和社会经济地位来衡量。计算1年和3年生存率。采用多变量回归分析来估计调整后的种族生存率差异。结果:在所有研究变量中存在种族生存差异。所有贝都因患者都生活在社会经济地位较低的定居点(以色列南部的所有贝都因定居点都处于较低的社会经济十分位数)。髓母细胞瘤28例。7例(25%)表现为脑膜轻病或远处转移。由于逻辑原因,未对成神经管细胞瘤分子亚组进行评估。贝都因人的三年总体生存率为50%,而犹太人为92.3%。贝都因患者3年调整后死亡风险显著高于其他患者(aHR 3.36, 95% CI 1.41-7.98, P = 0.006)。结论:我们的结论是,与犹太儿童相比,患有中枢神经系统肿瘤的贝都因儿童的存活率明显较低,而SES似乎是造成这种差异的主要原因。应处理影响这些差异的因素,并制定消除这些差异的公共卫生干预措施。
{"title":"Ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in survival of children and adolescents with CNS tumors in Southern Israel.","authors":"Abed Abu-Quider, Mahdi Asleh","doi":"10.1093/nop/npac041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npac041","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study sought to evaluate survival of pediatric and adolescent patients with central nervous system (CNS) cancer in southern Israel, outline disparities between ethnic and socioeconomic groups (Bedouin Arabs compared to Jews) and evaluate the role of socioeconomic status (SES) in ethnic disparities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted among 91 patients aged one to 20 years, who were diagnosed with CNS tumors between 2001 and 2017, and followed-up through 2020. Ethnic differences in survival were measured by age, sex, stage, histology and SES. One and 3-year survival rates were calculated. Multivariable regression analysis was used to estimate adjusted ethnic differences in survival rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ethnic differences in survival existed within all studied variables. All Bedouin patients lived in low SES settlements (All Bedouin settlement in Southern Israel are ranked in lower socioeconomic deciles). Twenty-eight patients had medulloblastoma. Seven (25%) presented with leptomeningeal disease or distant metastases. Medulloblastoma molecular subgroups were not assessed for logistic reasons. Three-year overall survival of Bedouins was 50% compared to 92.3% for Jews. Adjusted risk of death at 3 years was significantly higher for Bedouin patients (aHR 3.36, 95% CI 1.41-7.98, <i>P</i> = .006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We conclude that Bedouin children with CNS tumors have significantly lower survival rates compared to Jewish children, and SES seems to play a major part in these disparities. Factors influencing these disparities should be addressed and public health interventions to eliminate these disparities should be developed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19234,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology practice","volume":"9 5","pages":"441-448"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9476970/pdf/npac041.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9485951","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}