Neurosurgery最新文献

Background and objectives: The management of moyamoya disease during pregnancy and recommendations for the mode of delivery remain controversial. We investigated factors associated with neurologic events during pregnancy in women with moyamoya disease and its association with prepregnancy surgical revascularization.

Methods: We performed a literature search from January 1, 1970, through September 30, 2021, using Embase, Web of Science, Medline, and Cochrane to identify cases of moyamoya disease with pregnancy. Primary outcome was neurologic events during pregnancy and were subcategorized into antepartum, intrapartum (within 24 hours of delivery), and postpartum events. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses using pooled results were performed to assess risk factors associated with neurologic events.

Results: Fifty-two relevant studies with 182 individuals diagnosed with moyamoya before pregnancy, and 229 pregnancies were included in the study. 59% underwent surgical revascularization before pregnancy. Of the 229 pregnancies, 22 (9.6%) patients had ischemic events and 3 (1.3%) had hemorrhagic events. In addition, there were 7 (3%) seizures and 4 (1.7%) other neurologic events not associated with ischemia or hemorrhage. There were fewer neurologic events during pregnancy in patients treated with surgery than those without surgery (11% surgical vs 24% medical, P = .009). Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated prior surgical revascularization as the only factor associated with lower number of neurologic events during pregnancy (odds ratio 0.42 [95% CI 0.19-0.96]). Mode of delivery (vaginal vs cesarean section) was not associated with a difference in overall intrapartum and postpartum neurologic events.

Conclusion: We found that prior revascularization surgery was the only factor associated with fewer neurologic events during pregnancy in women with moyamoya disease. Mode of delivery was not associated with increased neurologic events during or after delivery.

Background and objective: Traumatic acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) is a medical emergency that requires prompt neurosurgical intervention. Urgent surgical evacuation may be performed with craniotomy (CO) and decompressive craniectomy (DC). However, a meta-analysis evaluating confounders, pooled functional outcomes, and mortality analyses at different time points has not been performed.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted until August 28, 2023. We identified studies performing ASDH evacuation with CO or DC. Outcomes included Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), GOS-Extended, mortality, procedure-related complications, and reoperation. Variables were assessed using risk ratio (RR) and mean difference.

Results: Among 684 published articles, we included the Randomized Evaluation of Surgery with Craniectomy for Patients Undergoing Evacuation of ASDH (RESCUE-ASDH) trial, 4 propensity score-matched (PSM) cohorts, and 13 observational cohort studies. A total of 8886 patients underwent CO or DC. GCS at admission in unmatched cohorts was significantly worse in the DC group (mean difference = 2.20 [95% CI = 1.86-2.55], P < .00001). GOS-Extended scores were similar among CO and DC (RR = 1.10 [95% CI = 0.85-1.42], P = .49), including the RESCUE-ASDH trial. GOS at the last follow-up in unmatched cohorts significantly favored CO (RR = 1.66 [95% CI = 1.02-2.70], P = .04). Similarly, while short-term mortality favored CO over DC (RR = 0.69 [95% CI = 0.51-0.93], P = .02), both the RESCUE-ASDH trial and the PSM-cohorts yielded similar mortality rates among groups (P > .05). Mortality at the last follow-up in unmatched patients favored CO (RR = 0.60 [95% CI = 0.47-0.77], P < .0001). Procedure-related complications (RR = 0.74 [0.50-1.09], P = .12) and reoperation rates (RR = 0.74 [0.50-1.09], P = .12) were similar.

Conclusion: Patients with ASDH undergoing DC across unmatched cohorts had a worse GCS at admission. Although ASDH mortality was lower in the CO group, these findings are derived from unmatched cohorts, potentially confounding previous analyses. Notably, population-matched studies, such as the RESCUE-ASDH trial and PSM cohorts, showed similar effectiveness in mortality and functional outcomes between CO and DC. Reoperation and complication rates were comparable among surgical approaches. Considering the prevalence of unmatched cohorts, our findings highlight the need of future clinical trials to validate the findings of the RESCUE-ASDH trial.

Background and objectives: Maximizing the extent of resection (EOR) improves outcomes in glioblastoma (GBM). However, previous GBM studies have not addressed the EOR impact in molecular subgroups beyond IDH1/IDH2 status. In the current article, we evaluate whether EOR confers a benefit in all GBM subtypes or only in particular molecular subgroups.

Methods: A retrospective cohort of newly diagnosed GBM isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype undergoing resection were prospectively included in a database (n = 138). EOR and residual tumor volume (RTV) were quantified with semiautomated software. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissues were analyzed by targeted next-generation sequencing. The association between recurrent genomic alterations and EOR/RTV was evaluated using a recursive partitioning analysis to identify thresholds of EOR or RTV that may predict survival. The Kaplan-Meier methods and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression methods were applied for survival analysis.

Results: Patients with EOR ≥88% experienced 44% prolonged overall survival (OS) in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio: 0.56, P = .030). Patients with alterations in the TP53 pathway and EOR <89% showed reduced OS compared to TP53 pathway altered patients with EOR>89% (10.5 vs 18.8 months; HR: 2.78, P = .013); however, EOR/RTV was not associated with OS in patients without alterations in the TP53 pathway. Meanwhile, in all patients with EOR <88%, PTEN -altered had significantly worse OS than PTEN -wildtype (9.5 vs 15.4 months; HR: 4.53, P < .001).

Conclusion: Our results suggest that a subset of molecularly defined GBM IDH-wildtype may benefit more from aggressive resections. Re-resections to optimize EOR might be beneficial in a subset of molecularly defined GBMs. Molecular alterations should be taken into consideration for surgical treatment decisions in GBM IDH-wildtype.

Global neurosurgery seeks to provide quality neurosurgical health care worldwide and faces challenges because of historical, socioeconomic, and political factors. To address the shortfall of essential neurosurgical procedures worldwide, dyads between established neurosurgical and developing centers have been established. Concerns have been raised about their effectiveness and ability to sustain capacity development. Successful partnerships involve multiple stakeholders, extended timelines, and twinning programs. This article outlines current initiatives and challenges within the neurosurgical community. This narrative review aims to provide a practical tool for colleagues embarking on clinical partnerships, the Engagements and assets, Capacity, Operative autonomy, Sustainability, and scalability (ECOSystem) of care. To create the ECOSystem of care in global neurosurgery, the authors had multiple online discussions regarding important points in the practical tool. All developed tiers were expanded based on logistics, clinical, and educational aspects. An online search was performed from August to November 2023 to highlight global neurosurgery partnerships and link them to tiers of the ECOSystem. The ECOSystem of care involves 5 tiers: Tiers 0 (foundation), 1 (essential), 2 (complexity), 3 (autonomy), and 4 (final). A nonexhaustive list of 16 neurosurgical partnerships was created and serves as a reference for using the ECOSystem. Personal experiences from the authors through their partnerships were also captured. We propose a tiered approach for capacity building that provides structured guidance for establishing neurosurgical partnerships with the ECOSystem of care. Clinical partnerships in global neurosurgery aim to build autonomy, enabling independent provision of quality healthcare services.

Background and objectives: Anterior basal encephaloceles are considered a rare entity and are often associated with midline cerebral abnormalities. Those with a large skull base defect and herniation of brain parenchyma in the neonate or young infant present unique challenges for surgical management.

Methods: We analyzed the neurosurgical administrative and operative databases between 1986 and 2022 to determine clinical presentation, operative approach, and outcome of basal encephaloceles.

Results: Over the 36-year period, 27 pediatric anterior basal encephaloceles were managed, of which 22 had full documentation and images allowing comprehensive review. Mean age at presentation was 5 years (SD 4.94). The majority were transethmoidal encephaloceles (59%), followed by the transsphenoidal-sphenoethmoidal type (32%). Overall, 91% were managed surgically by a transcranial, endoscopic, or combined approach. Four children required subsequent procedures, predominantly for persistent cerebrospinal fluid leak. No significant differences in proportion of patients requiring interval/revision surgery after initial conservative, endoscopic endonasal, or transcranial surgery was identified. Neither age at surgery nor size of the defect on computed tomography scan was associated with the need for revision surgery. Size of cranial defect was significantly smaller in the endoscopic group ( P = .01). There was a historic tendency for younger children with larger defects to have a transcranial approach. With the addition of endoscopic skull base expertise, smaller defects in older children were more recently treated endoscopically.

Conclusion: Basal encephaloceles are rare and complex lesions and are optimally managed within a skull base multidisciplinary team able to provide multiple approaches. Large skull base defects with brain parenchymal involvement often require a transcranial or combined transcranial-endoscopic approach.

Background and objectives: Postclipping cerebral infarction (PCI) remains a major concern after treatment for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs). However, studies of microsurgical clipping based on diffusion-weighted imaging are limited. We aimed to present the incidence, risk factors, and types of PCI and its radiological and clinical characteristics.

Methods: This was a retrospective single-center study in which patients were scheduled to undergo microsurgical clipping for anterior circulation UIAs. The overall incidence and risk factors were calculated. Based on the operation and relevant artery, we categorized PCI on diffusion-weighted imaging into 4 types and presented their radiological and clinical characteristics.

Results: We reviewed the radiological and clinical data of 605 patients. The overall incidence of PCI was 16.7% (101/605), of which asymptomatic infarction was 14.9% (90/605) and symptomatic infarction was 1.8% (11/605). Hypertension (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.258; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.330-3.833), temporary clipping (aOR, 1.690; 95% CI: 1.034-2.760), multiple aneurysm locations (aOR, 1.832; 95% CI: 1.084-3.095), and aneurysm dome size (aOR, 1.094; 95% CI: 1.006-1.190) were independent risk factors for PCI. Type II (perianeurysmal perforator) infarction was the most common type of PCI (48.6%) and the most common cause of symptomatic infarction (72.7%). Types II and III (distal embolic) infarctions correlated with atherosclerotic changes in the aneurysm wall and temporary clipping (62.4% and 70.6%, respectively). The type IV (unrelated) infarction group had a higher incidence of systemic atherosclerosis (55%).

Conclusion: Microsurgical clipping is a safe and viable option for the treatment of anterior circulation UIAs. However, modification of the surgical technique, preoperative radiological assessment, and patient selection are required to reduce the incidence of PCI.

Background and objectives: Bundled payment for care improvement advanced (BPCIA) is a voluntary alternative payment model administered by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services using value-based care to reduce costs by incentivizing care coordination and improved quality. We aimed to identify drivers of negative financial performance in BPCIA among patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery.

Methods: This is a single-institution retrospective review of patients enrolled in BPCIA undergoing spinal fusion with DRGs 453, 454, 455, 459, and 460 from 2018 to 2022. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with negative financial performance and compare nonelective vs elective surgeries.

Results: We identified 172 cases, of which 24% (n = 41) had negative financial performance and 9% (n = 16) were nonelective cases. Nonelective surgery (P < .001, odds ratios 19.81), greater levels instrumented (P < .001), and no anterior procedure (P = .001) were associated with negative financial performance. Surgical outcomes associated with negative financial performance and factors more common in nonelective cases respectively included higher hospital length of stay (P < .001, P = .005), nonhome discharge (P < .001, P < .001), 90-day hospital readmission (P < .001, P < .001), 90-day additional nonspine surgery (P = .01, P < .001), and less days at home of the 90 days (P < .001, P = .01). Nonelective surgeries had higher total spend (P = .01), readmission spend (P = .03), skilled nursing facility spend (P = .02), durable medical equipment spend (P = .003), and professional billing spend (P = .04) despite similar target pricing (P = .60), all of which resulted in greater financial loss compared with elective surgeries (P = .001).

Conclusion: Nonelective spinal surgery is an independent preoperative predictor of negative financial performance in BPCIA. Nonelective spinal surgeries are more likely than elective surgeries to have higher length of stay, nonhome discharge, 90-day hospital readmission, 90-day additional nonspine surgeries, and less time spent at home during the bundled period, all of which contribute to higher health care utilization. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services should consider incorporating nonelective spine surgery into risk-adjustment models.