Pub Date : 2026-02-18DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000003971
Kathleen R Ran, Anthony Bishara, Yuanxuan Xia, Sumil K Nair, Atharv Oak, Mostafa Abdulrahim, Nicholas Theodore, Timothy F Witham, Ali Bydon, Daniel Lubelski, Christopher M Jackson, Justin M Caplan, Judy Huang, Philippe Gailloud, L Fernando Gonzalez, Rafael J Tamargo, Risheng Xu
Background and objectives: Treatment of symptomatic spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (SDAVF) reduces spinal cord injury and prevents irreversible neurological deficits. It remains unclear whether endovascular embolization vs open surgical treatment of SDAVF is associated with better neurological outcomes. We aimed to compare neurological outcomes between patients who underwent endovascular embolization vs open surgical treatment as primary treatment of SDAVF.
Methods: Patients who underwent endovascular embolization or open surgical treatment as primary treatment of SDAVFs at our institution between 2012 and 2023 were retrospectively identified. The primary outcome assessed was neurological status measured using the Frankel grade and Nurick classification systems. Outcomes at final follow-up were compared with preintervention neurological status.
Results: A total of 48 patients (63.8 ± 11.1 years, 75.0% men) met study inclusion criteria. Endovascular embolization was performed in 29 patients, and open surgical treatment was performed in 19 patients. Baseline neurological function was similar for both treatment groups. At final follow-up, similar rates of Frankel (20.7% vs 21.1%, P > .999) and Nurick grade (55.2% vs 57.9%, P > .999) improvement were observed in endovascular vs open surgical treatment groups. Patients who underwent endovascular embolization had a shorter hospital stay (3.1 ± 2.3 vs 5.3 ± 1.8 days; mean difference = 2.2 days, 95% CI 0.93-3.42, P = .001). Reintervention for symptomatic SDAVF was required for 3 (10.3%) patients who underwent endovascular embolization and 0 (0.0%) patients who underwent open surgical treatment (P = .267).
Conclusion: Both endovascular embolization and open surgical treatment significantly improved neurological symptoms among patients with SDAVF, and similar neurological outcomes were achieved at final follow-up. Although high recurrence rates have been reported with endovascular treatment, they may be similar to open surgery in the hands of experienced operators. Treatment selection should be guided by multidisciplinary discussion of patient-specific risk factors.
背景与目的:对症脊髓硬膜动静脉瘘(SDAVF)的治疗可减少脊髓损伤,防止不可逆的神经功能缺损。目前尚不清楚血管内栓塞与开放手术治疗SDAVF是否与更好的神经预后相关。我们的目的是比较接受血管内栓塞和开放手术治疗作为SDAVF主要治疗的患者的神经系统预后。方法:回顾性分析2012年至2023年在我院接受血管内栓塞或开放手术治疗的SDAVFs患者。评估的主要结果是使用Frankel分级和Nurick分类系统测量神经状态。最后随访的结果与干预前的神经状态进行比较。结果:共有48例患者(63.8±11.1岁,75.0%男性)符合研究纳入标准。29例行血管内栓塞术,19例行开放手术治疗。两个治疗组的基线神经功能相似。在最后随访时,血管内治疗组与开放手术组的Frankel (20.7% vs 21.1%, P > .999)和Nurick评分(55.2% vs 57.9%, P > .999)改善率相似。行血管内栓塞的患者住院时间较短(3.1±2.3 vs 5.3±1.8天;平均差异= 2.2天,95% CI 0.93-3.42, P = .001)。3例(10.3%)接受血管内栓塞治疗的患者和0例(0.0%)接受开放手术治疗的患者需要对症状性SDAVF进行再干预(P = 0.267)。结论:血管内栓塞和开放手术治疗均可显著改善SDAVF患者的神经系统症状,最终随访时神经系统预后相似。尽管有报道称血管内治疗的复发率很高,但在经验丰富的手术人员手中,它们可能与开放手术相似。治疗选择应以多学科讨论患者特有的危险因素为指导。
{"title":"Functional Outcomes After Endovascular Versus Open Surgical Approach for Treatment of Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistula.","authors":"Kathleen R Ran, Anthony Bishara, Yuanxuan Xia, Sumil K Nair, Atharv Oak, Mostafa Abdulrahim, Nicholas Theodore, Timothy F Witham, Ali Bydon, Daniel Lubelski, Christopher M Jackson, Justin M Caplan, Judy Huang, Philippe Gailloud, L Fernando Gonzalez, Rafael J Tamargo, Risheng Xu","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000003971","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003971","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Treatment of symptomatic spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (SDAVF) reduces spinal cord injury and prevents irreversible neurological deficits. It remains unclear whether endovascular embolization vs open surgical treatment of SDAVF is associated with better neurological outcomes. We aimed to compare neurological outcomes between patients who underwent endovascular embolization vs open surgical treatment as primary treatment of SDAVF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent endovascular embolization or open surgical treatment as primary treatment of SDAVFs at our institution between 2012 and 2023 were retrospectively identified. The primary outcome assessed was neurological status measured using the Frankel grade and Nurick classification systems. Outcomes at final follow-up were compared with preintervention neurological status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 48 patients (63.8 ± 11.1 years, 75.0% men) met study inclusion criteria. Endovascular embolization was performed in 29 patients, and open surgical treatment was performed in 19 patients. Baseline neurological function was similar for both treatment groups. At final follow-up, similar rates of Frankel (20.7% vs 21.1%, P > .999) and Nurick grade (55.2% vs 57.9%, P > .999) improvement were observed in endovascular vs open surgical treatment groups. Patients who underwent endovascular embolization had a shorter hospital stay (3.1 ± 2.3 vs 5.3 ± 1.8 days; mean difference = 2.2 days, 95% CI 0.93-3.42, P = .001). Reintervention for symptomatic SDAVF was required for 3 (10.3%) patients who underwent endovascular embolization and 0 (0.0%) patients who underwent open surgical treatment (P = .267).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both endovascular embolization and open surgical treatment significantly improved neurological symptoms among patients with SDAVF, and similar neurological outcomes were achieved at final follow-up. Although high recurrence rates have been reported with endovascular treatment, they may be similar to open surgery in the hands of experienced operators. Treatment selection should be guided by multidisciplinary discussion of patient-specific risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146220535","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-16DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000003962
Kurt R Lehner, Anita L Kalluri, Kelly Jiang, Rama J Alawneh, Ryan P Lee, Foad Kazemi, Joan Yea, Sai Chandan Reddy, Jacob S Shaw, Eric M Jackson
Background and objectives: Identifying predictors of shunt failure in acute care settings is challenging. Previous studies largely rely on traditional statistical analyses to evaluate risk factors associated with shunt failure. However, these methods have not been adapted for emergency department (ED) presentations, where machine learning (ML) techniques may offer enhanced predictive power. Thus, we explored the application of ML and artificial intelligence in predicting necessity for shunt revision in pediatric ED visits.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1167 pediatric neurosurgical consults for suspected shunt malfunction from 2017 to 2022. We collected 24 historical, clinical, and radiographic variables. Various ML techniques were used, including support vector machine, K-nearest neighbors, random forest, an artificial neural network (ANN), and a proprietary large language model named ShuntGPT (SGPT), which classifies the need for shunt revision.
Results: Among 1167 ED consults for shunt malfunction, 285 patients (24.4%) underwent revision. Multivariate analysis identified increased ventricle size, abnormal shunt series, lethargy, altered mental status, and bradycardia as predictors of need for revision. The best-performing ML models included ANN (accuracy 84%, area under the curve [AUC] 0.88, 71% sensitivity, 88% specificity) and SGPT (accuracy 87%, precision 0.80, recall 0.64, AUC 0.927). Traditional classifiers (support vector machine, K-nearest neighbors, random forest) achieved AUCs of 0.81 to 0.86 with varying trade-offs in sensitivity and precision. With imaging results removed from training data, the performance of all models suffered, however, SGPT retained a high level of discrimination (AUC 0.84). SGPT continued to show high accuracy (83%) on a separate validation cohort.
Conclusion: Advanced ML models generally outperformed traditional statistical analyses, albeit with concerns about overfitting due to the extensive variable set. SGPT, in particular, showed superior performance, likely due to its capacity to interpret nuanced text. This model represents a promising tool to enhance decision-making in pediatric acute care settings regarding shunt malfunctions.
{"title":"Machine Learning Methods to Identify Pediatric Shunt Malfunction in the Acute Care Setting and the Development of ShuntGPT.","authors":"Kurt R Lehner, Anita L Kalluri, Kelly Jiang, Rama J Alawneh, Ryan P Lee, Foad Kazemi, Joan Yea, Sai Chandan Reddy, Jacob S Shaw, Eric M Jackson","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000003962","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003962","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Identifying predictors of shunt failure in acute care settings is challenging. Previous studies largely rely on traditional statistical analyses to evaluate risk factors associated with shunt failure. However, these methods have not been adapted for emergency department (ED) presentations, where machine learning (ML) techniques may offer enhanced predictive power. Thus, we explored the application of ML and artificial intelligence in predicting necessity for shunt revision in pediatric ED visits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1167 pediatric neurosurgical consults for suspected shunt malfunction from 2017 to 2022. We collected 24 historical, clinical, and radiographic variables. Various ML techniques were used, including support vector machine, K-nearest neighbors, random forest, an artificial neural network (ANN), and a proprietary large language model named ShuntGPT (SGPT), which classifies the need for shunt revision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1167 ED consults for shunt malfunction, 285 patients (24.4%) underwent revision. Multivariate analysis identified increased ventricle size, abnormal shunt series, lethargy, altered mental status, and bradycardia as predictors of need for revision. The best-performing ML models included ANN (accuracy 84%, area under the curve [AUC] 0.88, 71% sensitivity, 88% specificity) and SGPT (accuracy 87%, precision 0.80, recall 0.64, AUC 0.927). Traditional classifiers (support vector machine, K-nearest neighbors, random forest) achieved AUCs of 0.81 to 0.86 with varying trade-offs in sensitivity and precision. With imaging results removed from training data, the performance of all models suffered, however, SGPT retained a high level of discrimination (AUC 0.84). SGPT continued to show high accuracy (83%) on a separate validation cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Advanced ML models generally outperformed traditional statistical analyses, albeit with concerns about overfitting due to the extensive variable set. SGPT, in particular, showed superior performance, likely due to its capacity to interpret nuanced text. This model represents a promising tool to enhance decision-making in pediatric acute care settings regarding shunt malfunctions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146202336","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-16DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000003963
Saksham Gupta, Zsombor T Gal, Jay Touray, Gabrielle A Luiselli, Ancha Ceesay, Ebrima K Manneh, Makumba Cham, John D Rolston, Ryan Chrenek, Momodou G Bah, Alexandra J Golby, Ignatius N Esene, Omar Arnaout, Camejo Sanchez, Lamin Janneh, Timothy R Smith, John N Jabang
Background and objectives: Access to specialty surgical care is growing in many low-income countries, but it remains unclear how hospital workforces can leverage technology to manage large numbers of increasingly complex patients. Large language models (LLMs) may be helpful for this type of clinical decision support, but their real-world performance and safety remain uncertain. The objective of this study was to evaluate feasibility, usability, and potential benefits and risks of an LLM-based assistant for postoperative neurosurgical care in the Gambia.
Methods: A prospective, single-arm implementation study was conducted at the Edward Francis Small Teaching Hospital. A convenience sample of 4 medical officers (MOs) and 5 nurses assigned to the neurosurgical service participated. A prompted GPT-4o Turbo was deployed on OpenAI Pro accounts to support performance. Usability, helpfulness, and safety were the primary outcomes. Cost-effectiveness was a secondary outcome.
Results: Participants completed 75 LLM-assisted interactions on 9 postoperative neurosurgery patients. Usability metrics indicated a moderately high cognitive workload, marginally acceptable usability of the LLM system, and high perceived ease of use. Management plan quality improved in 45 of 75 mock rounds interactions (60%), with a mean improvement of 8.5% (P < .001) on mock rounds scoring rubrics. The improvement was greater for MOs (21.0% change) than nurses (6.5% change). In hypothetical case dilemmas, MO plan accuracy improved by 22.7% (P = .001), and critical errors declined from 33.3% to 0%. Fourteen care changes for 9 patients were attributed to LLM suggestions, including 6 that potentially prevented major morbidity. No unsafe outputs were detected. Exploratory cost analysis suggested potential savings from clinical care changes exceeded the labor costs involved in LLM use.
Conclusion: LLM use was associated with improved plan quality without observed safety concerns, while also prompting clinically meaningful care changes. Larger, controlled studies are needed to determine generalizability, durability of benefit, and patient-centered outcomes.
{"title":"Large Language Model for Postoperative Clinical Decision Support in a Neurosurgery Ward in the Gambia: A Prospective Pilot Feasibility Study.","authors":"Saksham Gupta, Zsombor T Gal, Jay Touray, Gabrielle A Luiselli, Ancha Ceesay, Ebrima K Manneh, Makumba Cham, John D Rolston, Ryan Chrenek, Momodou G Bah, Alexandra J Golby, Ignatius N Esene, Omar Arnaout, Camejo Sanchez, Lamin Janneh, Timothy R Smith, John N Jabang","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000003963","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003963","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Access to specialty surgical care is growing in many low-income countries, but it remains unclear how hospital workforces can leverage technology to manage large numbers of increasingly complex patients. Large language models (LLMs) may be helpful for this type of clinical decision support, but their real-world performance and safety remain uncertain. The objective of this study was to evaluate feasibility, usability, and potential benefits and risks of an LLM-based assistant for postoperative neurosurgical care in the Gambia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, single-arm implementation study was conducted at the Edward Francis Small Teaching Hospital. A convenience sample of 4 medical officers (MOs) and 5 nurses assigned to the neurosurgical service participated. A prompted GPT-4o Turbo was deployed on OpenAI Pro accounts to support performance. Usability, helpfulness, and safety were the primary outcomes. Cost-effectiveness was a secondary outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants completed 75 LLM-assisted interactions on 9 postoperative neurosurgery patients. Usability metrics indicated a moderately high cognitive workload, marginally acceptable usability of the LLM system, and high perceived ease of use. Management plan quality improved in 45 of 75 mock rounds interactions (60%), with a mean improvement of 8.5% (P < .001) on mock rounds scoring rubrics. The improvement was greater for MOs (21.0% change) than nurses (6.5% change). In hypothetical case dilemmas, MO plan accuracy improved by 22.7% (P = .001), and critical errors declined from 33.3% to 0%. Fourteen care changes for 9 patients were attributed to LLM suggestions, including 6 that potentially prevented major morbidity. No unsafe outputs were detected. Exploratory cost analysis suggested potential savings from clinical care changes exceeded the labor costs involved in LLM use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LLM use was associated with improved plan quality without observed safety concerns, while also prompting clinically meaningful care changes. Larger, controlled studies are needed to determine generalizability, durability of benefit, and patient-centered outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146202247","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background and objectives: Supratentorial herniation is traditionally described as a mechanical shift of brain structures due to elevated intracranial pressure. However, this model inadequately explains the stepwise physiological decline observed in patients with progressive brainstem dysfunction. We aimed to propose and support a novel conceptual model of herniation based on a vertically oriented compaction gradient and the emergence of a "demarcation line of tissue compaction" as a physiological boundary between viable and irreversibly failing neural tissue.
Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted between 2022 and 2025, involving 287 patients with traumatic supratentorial brain herniation admitted to the neurosurgical departments of 3 urban hospitals. Clinical staging was based on consciousness, pupillary reactivity, brainstem reflexes, motor responses, respiratory pattern, and the Kerdo Vegetative Index. Postmortem morphological analysis was conducted in 129 cases to determine the rostrocaudal extent of brainstem injury.
Results: Five distinct stages of herniation were identified, each correlated with specific clinical features and anatomic damage. A progressive downward pattern of neurological deterioration and structural destruction was observed from the diencephalon to the medulla. The progression was often preceded by a physiological cluster-Hyper-H triad-manifesting as hyperthermia, hypertonia, and hormonal dysregulation. Clinical signs and autonomic shifts consistently mirrored this descent. The findings support the presence of a transitional frontier-termed the demarcation line of compaction-separating salvageable function from collapse.
Conclusion: Supratentorial herniation represents not only spatial displacement but also a structured physiological degradation. The compaction model provides a dynamic framework for understanding herniation progression and may assist in bedside assessment, staging, and early intervention. The Hyper-H triad may serve as an early physiological indicator of impending herniation. Further prospective and imaging-based studies are warranted to validate this approach.
{"title":"Demarcation Line of Tissue Compaction in Traumatic Brain Herniation: A Conceptual and Clinical Model.","authors":"Baglan Mustafayev, Alina Mustafayeva, Askar Bakhtiyarov, Kuanysh Nikatov, Balausa Satylkhan","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000003965","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003965","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Supratentorial herniation is traditionally described as a mechanical shift of brain structures due to elevated intracranial pressure. However, this model inadequately explains the stepwise physiological decline observed in patients with progressive brainstem dysfunction. We aimed to propose and support a novel conceptual model of herniation based on a vertically oriented compaction gradient and the emergence of a \"demarcation line of tissue compaction\" as a physiological boundary between viable and irreversibly failing neural tissue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was conducted between 2022 and 2025, involving 287 patients with traumatic supratentorial brain herniation admitted to the neurosurgical departments of 3 urban hospitals. Clinical staging was based on consciousness, pupillary reactivity, brainstem reflexes, motor responses, respiratory pattern, and the Kerdo Vegetative Index. Postmortem morphological analysis was conducted in 129 cases to determine the rostrocaudal extent of brainstem injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five distinct stages of herniation were identified, each correlated with specific clinical features and anatomic damage. A progressive downward pattern of neurological deterioration and structural destruction was observed from the diencephalon to the medulla. The progression was often preceded by a physiological cluster-Hyper-H triad-manifesting as hyperthermia, hypertonia, and hormonal dysregulation. Clinical signs and autonomic shifts consistently mirrored this descent. The findings support the presence of a transitional frontier-termed the demarcation line of compaction-separating salvageable function from collapse.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Supratentorial herniation represents not only spatial displacement but also a structured physiological degradation. The compaction model provides a dynamic framework for understanding herniation progression and may assist in bedside assessment, staging, and early intervention. The Hyper-H triad may serve as an early physiological indicator of impending herniation. Further prospective and imaging-based studies are warranted to validate this approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146202216","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-12DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000003961
Jared H Chung, Salem M Tos, Georgios Mantziaris, Yuki Shinya, Bardia Hajikarimloo, Jack Guiry, Abhinav Kareddy, Tanvika Vegiraju, Edward Llinas, David Penberthy, Zhiyuan Xu, Ryan Gentzler, Camilo Fadul, Jason P Sheehan
Background and objectives: Lung cancer is the most common primary neoplasm that metastasizes to the brain. Although stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) using American Society for Radiation Oncology guideline-suggested doses improves local control, it may increase adverse radiation events (AREs). This study evaluates whether reduced SRS doses can achieve comparable local control while minimizing toxicity in patients with brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) primary receiving concurrent systemic therapy.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 264 patients with 1390 metastases from lung primary treated with SRS between December 2015 and January 2025. Of these, 82 patients with 433 metastases had NSCLC and received concurrent systemic therapy, defined as immunotherapy or targeted therapy within 30 days of SRS. Propensity score matching identified 38 patients with 93 metastases in the higher-dose (HD) group (20-24 Gy for <2 cm, 18 Gy for ≥2 to <3 cm) and 42 patients with 93 metastases in the reduced-dose (RD) group (<20 Gy for <2 cm, <18 Gy for ≥2 to <3 cm).
Results: Radiographic AREs, including perilesional edema and radiation necrosis, were significantly more common in the HD group than in the RD group (23.7% vs 10.8%, P = .020). Local control was noninferior in the RD group (94.6%) compared with the HD group (90.3%, P = .400). Cumulative progression at 1, 3, and 5 years remained comparable between the RD (13%, 15%, and 15%, respectively) and HD (7.2%, 10%, and 10%, respectively) groups (P = .500).
Conclusion: In the contemporary era, RD SRS delivered concurrently with immunotherapy or targeted therapy may lower AREs without compromising local control to treat NSCLC brain metastases.
背景和目的:肺癌是最常见的转移到脑部的原发肿瘤。虽然立体定向放射外科(SRS)使用美国放射肿瘤学学会指南建议的剂量可以改善局部控制,但它可能增加不良辐射事件(AREs)。本研究评估减少SRS剂量是否可以在减少非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)脑转移患者同时接受全身治疗的同时达到相当的局部控制。方法:我们对2015年12月至2025年1月期间接受SRS治疗的264例1390例肺原发转移患者进行了回顾性研究。其中,82例433例转移性NSCLC患者同时接受了全身治疗,定义为免疫治疗或靶向治疗,在SRS后30天内。倾向评分匹配在高剂量(HD)组(20-24 Gy)中鉴定出38例93例转移灶患者。结果:放射学上的AREs,包括病灶周围水肿和放射性坏死,在HD组中明显比在RD组中更常见(23.7% vs 10.8%, P = 0.020)。与HD组(90.3%,P = 0.400)相比,RD组(94.6%)的局部控制性并不差。RD组(分别为13%、15%和15%)和HD组(分别为7.2%、10%和10%)1、3和5年的累积进展具有可比性(P = .500)。结论:在当代,RD SRS与免疫治疗或靶向治疗同时进行,可以在不影响局部控制的情况下降低AREs,以治疗NSCLC脑转移。
{"title":"Stereotactic Radiosurgery Dose Reduction for Patients With Brain Metastases From Non-Small Cell Lung Primary on Immunotherapy or Targeted Therapy.","authors":"Jared H Chung, Salem M Tos, Georgios Mantziaris, Yuki Shinya, Bardia Hajikarimloo, Jack Guiry, Abhinav Kareddy, Tanvika Vegiraju, Edward Llinas, David Penberthy, Zhiyuan Xu, Ryan Gentzler, Camilo Fadul, Jason P Sheehan","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000003961","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003961","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Lung cancer is the most common primary neoplasm that metastasizes to the brain. Although stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) using American Society for Radiation Oncology guideline-suggested doses improves local control, it may increase adverse radiation events (AREs). This study evaluates whether reduced SRS doses can achieve comparable local control while minimizing toxicity in patients with brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) primary receiving concurrent systemic therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study of 264 patients with 1390 metastases from lung primary treated with SRS between December 2015 and January 2025. Of these, 82 patients with 433 metastases had NSCLC and received concurrent systemic therapy, defined as immunotherapy or targeted therapy within 30 days of SRS. Propensity score matching identified 38 patients with 93 metastases in the higher-dose (HD) group (20-24 Gy for <2 cm, 18 Gy for ≥2 to <3 cm) and 42 patients with 93 metastases in the reduced-dose (RD) group (<20 Gy for <2 cm, <18 Gy for ≥2 to <3 cm).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Radiographic AREs, including perilesional edema and radiation necrosis, were significantly more common in the HD group than in the RD group (23.7% vs 10.8%, P = .020). Local control was noninferior in the RD group (94.6%) compared with the HD group (90.3%, P = .400). Cumulative progression at 1, 3, and 5 years remained comparable between the RD (13%, 15%, and 15%, respectively) and HD (7.2%, 10%, and 10%, respectively) groups (P = .500).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the contemporary era, RD SRS delivered concurrently with immunotherapy or targeted therapy may lower AREs without compromising local control to treat NSCLC brain metastases.</p>","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146165918","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-12DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000003957
S Farzad Maroufi, Pravarakhya Puppalla, Omkar Katkade, John N Theodore, Sai Chandan Reddy, Carlos Andres Aude, Ryan P Lee, Risheng Xu, Abhay R Moghekar, Ferdinand Hui, Mark G Luciano
Background and objectives: Venous sinus stenting (VSS) has emerged as an alternative treatment for selected idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) cases, but its comparative effectiveness and safety vs ventricular shunting (VS) remain uncertain. Given the heterogeneity of IIH, we hypothesized that outcomes differ by patient phenotype defined by obesity and visual disturbance at diagnosis.
Methods: Adults with IIH who underwent VSS or VS shunting were identified using TriNetX. Patients were stratified into 4 prespecified phenotypes: nonobese-visual-disturbance (NO-V), nonobese-no-visual-disturbance (NO-NV), obese-visual-disturbance (OV), and obese-no-visual-disturbance (ONV). Within each phenotype, 1:1 propensity score matching balanced baseline demographics, comorbidities, and laboratory parameters. Primary outcomes were persistent headache, papilledema, and visual disturbance within 24 months. Secondary outcomes included retreatment, head computed tomography use, and emergency department visits.
Results: After matching (NO-V = 69, NO-NV = 186, OV = 305, ONV = 440 per arm), cohorts were well balanced. In NO-NV, VS was associated with higher rates of headache (risk difference [RD]: 0.11, P = .049), visual disturbances (RD: 0.11, P = .010), and emergency department visits (RD: 0.15, P = .006). NO-V showed no primary outcome differences, although vestibular disorders were more common with shunts (RD: 0.15, P = .008). In OV, VS shunting was linked to higher rates of visual deficits (RD: 0.11, P = .045). Conversely, in ONV, shunting was associated with lower rates of papilledema (RD: -0.6, P = .024) and pulsatile tinnitus (RD: -0.5, P = .004) but increased headaches (RD: 0.12, P < .001). Across phenotypes, shunted patients had greater head computed tomography use and retreatment rates, while VSS patients more often required ongoing medical therapy.
Conclusion: The comparative effectiveness of VSS and VS in IIH varies by phenotype. VSS appears preferable in nonobese patients without visual symptoms, whereas VS may better control papilledema in obese patients without visual disturbance. Both treatments show similar efficacy in patients with baseline visual impairment. These findings underscore the need for phenotype-guided, prospective trials.
背景和目的:静脉窦支架植入术(VSS)已成为特发性颅内高压(IIH)病例的一种替代治疗方法,但其相对于心室分流(vs)的有效性和安全性仍不确定。鉴于IIH的异质性,我们假设结果因诊断时肥胖和视觉障碍定义的患者表型而异。方法:使用TriNetX识别接受VSS或VS分流的成人IIH。患者被分为4种预先指定的表型:非肥胖-视觉障碍(NO-V)、非肥胖-无视觉障碍(NO-NV)、肥胖-视觉障碍(OV)和肥胖-无视觉障碍(ONV)。在每种表型中,1:1倾向评分匹配平衡基线人口统计学,合并症和实验室参数。主要结局为24个月内持续性头痛、乳头水肿和视觉障碍。次要结果包括再治疗、头部计算机断层扫描和急诊就诊。结果:匹配后(NO-V = 69, NO-NV = 186, OV = 305, ONV = 440),队列平衡良好。在NO-NV中,VS与较高的头痛发生率(风险差[RD]: 0.11, P = 0.049)、视觉障碍发生率(风险差[RD]: 0.11, P = 0.010)和急诊科就诊率(风险差:0.15,P = 0.006)相关。no - v无主要结局差异,尽管前庭功能障碍在分流术中更为常见(RD: 0.15, P = 0.008)。在OV中,VS分流与更高的视力缺陷率相关(RD: 0.11, P = 0.045)。相反,在ONV中,分流与较低的乳头水肿发生率(RD: -0.6, P = 0.024)和搏动性耳鸣(RD: -0.5, P = 0.004)相关,但增加了头痛(RD: 0.12, P < 0.001)。在所有表型中,分流患者有更高的头部计算机断层扫描使用率和再治疗率,而VSS患者更经常需要持续的药物治疗。结论:VSS和VS治疗IIH的比较疗效因表型而异。VSS适用于无视觉症状的非肥胖患者,而VS可更好地控制无视觉障碍的肥胖患者的乳头水肿。两种治疗方法对基线视力障碍患者的疗效相似。这些发现强调了以表型为导向的前瞻性试验的必要性。
{"title":"Comparative Effectiveness of Venous Sinus Stenting and Ventricular Shunting for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A Phenotype-Stratified, Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.","authors":"S Farzad Maroufi, Pravarakhya Puppalla, Omkar Katkade, John N Theodore, Sai Chandan Reddy, Carlos Andres Aude, Ryan P Lee, Risheng Xu, Abhay R Moghekar, Ferdinand Hui, Mark G Luciano","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000003957","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003957","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Venous sinus stenting (VSS) has emerged as an alternative treatment for selected idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) cases, but its comparative effectiveness and safety vs ventricular shunting (VS) remain uncertain. Given the heterogeneity of IIH, we hypothesized that outcomes differ by patient phenotype defined by obesity and visual disturbance at diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults with IIH who underwent VSS or VS shunting were identified using TriNetX. Patients were stratified into 4 prespecified phenotypes: nonobese-visual-disturbance (NO-V), nonobese-no-visual-disturbance (NO-NV), obese-visual-disturbance (OV), and obese-no-visual-disturbance (ONV). Within each phenotype, 1:1 propensity score matching balanced baseline demographics, comorbidities, and laboratory parameters. Primary outcomes were persistent headache, papilledema, and visual disturbance within 24 months. Secondary outcomes included retreatment, head computed tomography use, and emergency department visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching (NO-V = 69, NO-NV = 186, OV = 305, ONV = 440 per arm), cohorts were well balanced. In NO-NV, VS was associated with higher rates of headache (risk difference [RD]: 0.11, P = .049), visual disturbances (RD: 0.11, P = .010), and emergency department visits (RD: 0.15, P = .006). NO-V showed no primary outcome differences, although vestibular disorders were more common with shunts (RD: 0.15, P = .008). In OV, VS shunting was linked to higher rates of visual deficits (RD: 0.11, P = .045). Conversely, in ONV, shunting was associated with lower rates of papilledema (RD: -0.6, P = .024) and pulsatile tinnitus (RD: -0.5, P = .004) but increased headaches (RD: 0.12, P < .001). Across phenotypes, shunted patients had greater head computed tomography use and retreatment rates, while VSS patients more often required ongoing medical therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The comparative effectiveness of VSS and VS in IIH varies by phenotype. VSS appears preferable in nonobese patients without visual symptoms, whereas VS may better control papilledema in obese patients without visual disturbance. Both treatments show similar efficacy in patients with baseline visual impairment. These findings underscore the need for phenotype-guided, prospective trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146165754","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-12DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000003956
Ishan Shah, David Gomez, Kevin G Liu, David J Cote, Robert G Briggs, Benjamin Fixman, Bryce D Beutler, Apurva Prasad, Jonathan Sisti, Reza Assadsangabi, Gabriel Zada
Background and objectives: Meningioma consistency is linked to important clinical and surgical outcomes, and preoperative knowledge of consistency may have significant implications for operative planning and decision making. This study aimed to determine whether intraoperative meningioma consistency is associated with preoperative T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and diffusion-weighted imaging.
Methods: Tumor consistency was prospectively assigned in 188 meningioma patients at the time of surgery over a twelve-year period (2012-2024) using a 5-point scale with validated interuser reliability. Signal intensity was quantified as the intensity ratio between region of interest in the meningioma and the middle cerebellar peduncle using a previously validated methodology (tumor/cerebellar peduncle T2WI intensity [TCTI] ratios). Mean and maximum signal intensity were measured using T2 and diffusion-weighted MRI sequences.
Results: When using mean T2WI measurements, TCTI ratios were lower for grade 4 + 5 tumors (1.41 ± 0.31, 95% CI: -0.418 to -0.182, P < .001) compared with consistency grade 3 tumors (1.71 ± 0.32, reference group) and grade 1 + 2 tumors (1.98 ± 0.36, 95% CI: -0.453 to -0.074, P < .004). A similar trend was observed using max region of interest measurements. No association was found between consistency and diffusion-weighted imaging. TCTI ratios using mean (odds ratio: 0.031, 95% CI: 0.009 to 0.101, P < .001) and max (odds ratio: 0.027, 95% CI: 0.007 to 0.097, P < .001) measurements were independent predictors of consistency when adjusting for covariates. In an receiver operating characteristic analysis comparing T2 mean ratios for grade 1 + 2 to 4 + 5 tumors, the area under the curve was 0.868 and precision-recall area under the curve was 0.960. A TCTI ratio cutoff of 1.536 was 75.0% sensitive and 100% specific in differentiating grade 1 + 2 and grade 4 + 5 tumors using T2WI alone.
Conclusion: In meningiomas, the TCTI ratio is associated with intraoperative tumor consistency, with higher signal intensity ratios predicting softer meningioma consistency. Application in this manner may augment surgical planning and improve preoperative patient counseling.
{"title":"T2-Weighted MRI Signal Intensity Ratio Predicts Intraoperative Intracranial Meningioma Consistency: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Ishan Shah, David Gomez, Kevin G Liu, David J Cote, Robert G Briggs, Benjamin Fixman, Bryce D Beutler, Apurva Prasad, Jonathan Sisti, Reza Assadsangabi, Gabriel Zada","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000003956","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003956","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Meningioma consistency is linked to important clinical and surgical outcomes, and preoperative knowledge of consistency may have significant implications for operative planning and decision making. This study aimed to determine whether intraoperative meningioma consistency is associated with preoperative T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and diffusion-weighted imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Tumor consistency was prospectively assigned in 188 meningioma patients at the time of surgery over a twelve-year period (2012-2024) using a 5-point scale with validated interuser reliability. Signal intensity was quantified as the intensity ratio between region of interest in the meningioma and the middle cerebellar peduncle using a previously validated methodology (tumor/cerebellar peduncle T2WI intensity [TCTI] ratios). Mean and maximum signal intensity were measured using T2 and diffusion-weighted MRI sequences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When using mean T2WI measurements, TCTI ratios were lower for grade 4 + 5 tumors (1.41 ± 0.31, 95% CI: -0.418 to -0.182, P < .001) compared with consistency grade 3 tumors (1.71 ± 0.32, reference group) and grade 1 + 2 tumors (1.98 ± 0.36, 95% CI: -0.453 to -0.074, P < .004). A similar trend was observed using max region of interest measurements. No association was found between consistency and diffusion-weighted imaging. TCTI ratios using mean (odds ratio: 0.031, 95% CI: 0.009 to 0.101, P < .001) and max (odds ratio: 0.027, 95% CI: 0.007 to 0.097, P < .001) measurements were independent predictors of consistency when adjusting for covariates. In an receiver operating characteristic analysis comparing T2 mean ratios for grade 1 + 2 to 4 + 5 tumors, the area under the curve was 0.868 and precision-recall area under the curve was 0.960. A TCTI ratio cutoff of 1.536 was 75.0% sensitive and 100% specific in differentiating grade 1 + 2 and grade 4 + 5 tumors using T2WI alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In meningiomas, the TCTI ratio is associated with intraoperative tumor consistency, with higher signal intensity ratios predicting softer meningioma consistency. Application in this manner may augment surgical planning and improve preoperative patient counseling.</p>","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146166110","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-12DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000003931
A Basit Khan, Malcolm F McDonald, Collin English, Shervin H Nouri, Kalman A Katlowitz, Sean Lau, Rajan Patel, Diego Rojas, Arif Harmanci, Ali Jalali, Ganesh Rao, Kumar Pichumani, Akdes S Harmanci, Tiemo J Klisch, Akash J Patel
Background and objectives: Clinical risk factors for seizure presentation in meningioma patients have been reported, but molecular correlates of seizures in meningioma remain unexplored.
Methods: We assessed a total of 144 primary meningiomas for clinical data and performed bulk RNA sequencing (n = 141), whole-exome sequencing (n = 35), targeted DNA sequencing (n = 67), and DNA methylation analysis (n = 62).
Results: Clinically, seizure presentation was associated with higher rates of emergency room presentation (P = .005), altered consciousness (P = .014), and fewer headaches (P = .015). Radiographically, seizure presentation correlated with higher rates of cerebral edema (P = .005), nonhomogenous enhancement (P = .001), and intratumoral calcification (P = .034). Pathologically, seizure presenting tumors had higher molecular immunology borstel 1 index (P = .001) and cellular atypia in World Health Organization grade 1 tumors (P = .023) but were not associated with World Health Organization grade 2 status (P = .059). There was no difference in rates of canonical mutations between groups. Chromosome 14q loss was enriched in the seizure group (P = .004). Seizure presentation was associated with the Molecular Group C (MenG C) (P = .023). Transcriptomic analysis revealed downregulation of GABAergic signaling, synaptic pathways, and neurotransmitter receptors in meningiomas causing seizure. Dysregulated genes included both MenG C-specific (GABRG1, GRIA1, DKK2) and seizure-specific/MenG-independent (GABRA3, GABRQ, GRIK3, NPY1R) genes.
Conclusion: Here, we show that seizure causing meningiomas demonstrate distinct clinical, radiographic, chromosomal, and transcriptional features. Novel associations with seizure presentation in meningioma include MenG C status, chromosome 14q loss, and seizure-specific dysregulation of neurotransmitter receptor genes.
{"title":"Integrated Clinical Genetic Analysis Reveals Transcriptional Neurotransmitter Receptor Dysregulation in Meningiomas Causing Seizure.","authors":"A Basit Khan, Malcolm F McDonald, Collin English, Shervin H Nouri, Kalman A Katlowitz, Sean Lau, Rajan Patel, Diego Rojas, Arif Harmanci, Ali Jalali, Ganesh Rao, Kumar Pichumani, Akdes S Harmanci, Tiemo J Klisch, Akash J Patel","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000003931","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003931","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Clinical risk factors for seizure presentation in meningioma patients have been reported, but molecular correlates of seizures in meningioma remain unexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed a total of 144 primary meningiomas for clinical data and performed bulk RNA sequencing (n = 141), whole-exome sequencing (n = 35), targeted DNA sequencing (n = 67), and DNA methylation analysis (n = 62).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinically, seizure presentation was associated with higher rates of emergency room presentation (P = .005), altered consciousness (P = .014), and fewer headaches (P = .015). Radiographically, seizure presentation correlated with higher rates of cerebral edema (P = .005), nonhomogenous enhancement (P = .001), and intratumoral calcification (P = .034). Pathologically, seizure presenting tumors had higher molecular immunology borstel 1 index (P = .001) and cellular atypia in World Health Organization grade 1 tumors (P = .023) but were not associated with World Health Organization grade 2 status (P = .059). There was no difference in rates of canonical mutations between groups. Chromosome 14q loss was enriched in the seizure group (P = .004). Seizure presentation was associated with the Molecular Group C (MenG C) (P = .023). Transcriptomic analysis revealed downregulation of GABAergic signaling, synaptic pathways, and neurotransmitter receptors in meningiomas causing seizure. Dysregulated genes included both MenG C-specific (GABRG1, GRIA1, DKK2) and seizure-specific/MenG-independent (GABRA3, GABRQ, GRIK3, NPY1R) genes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Here, we show that seizure causing meningiomas demonstrate distinct clinical, radiographic, chromosomal, and transcriptional features. Novel associations with seizure presentation in meningioma include MenG C status, chromosome 14q loss, and seizure-specific dysregulation of neurotransmitter receptor genes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146165883","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-12DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000003960
Kevin O Lillehei, Sarah Travers, Garni Barkhoudarian, Nelson M Oyesiku, Isabelle M Germano, D Ryan Ormond
{"title":"Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Role of Surgery for Patients With Functioning Pituitary Adenomas: Corrigendum.","authors":"Kevin O Lillehei, Sarah Travers, Garni Barkhoudarian, Nelson M Oyesiku, Isabelle M Germano, D Ryan Ormond","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000003960","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003960","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146165894","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-09DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000003933
Ian C Odland, Lily Huo, Rui Feng, Halima Tabani, John Durbin, Thomas Perillo, Daryl Goldman, Bradley Delman, Melissa Umphlett, Christopher P Kellner, Tomoyoshi Shigematsu, Shahram Majidi, Reade A De Leacy, Johanna T Fifi, Alejandro Berenstein, J Mocco, Joshua B Bederson, Raj K Shrivastava, Benjamin I Rapoport
Background and objectives: Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumors, with over 450 000 new cases each year. Although surgical resection remains the standard of care, recurrence occurs in up to 40% of cases. Reoperation poses additional risks due to anatomic changes and scar tissue. Elderly and frail patients experience increased rates of surgical morbidity, limiting treatment options. This study evaluates the potential of embolization, a technique traditionally used preoperatively to reduce intraoperative blood loss, as a definitive or palliative standalone treatment in select cases.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for System reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for studies reporting standalone meningioma embolization, defined as embolization without resection or radiotherapy for at least 2 months postprocedure. Two blinded reviewers screened articles using Covidence and conducted standardized data extraction. Variables collected included patient demographics, tumor characteristics, embolic agents, outcomes, and complications.
Results: This review identified 121 patients across 34 studies treated with standalone embolization. Of these, 67 patients had long-term follow-up. Symptomatic improvement was reported in 77 ± 6% of symptomatic patients, with radiographic tumor shrinkage observed in 84 ± 6%, and complete resolution seen in 5%. The major complication rate (5%) was comparable with that of preoperative embolization (3%-6%) and lower than that of surgical resection (7%-31%).
Conclusion: Standalone embolization potentially represents a lower-risk alternative for meningioma patients unsuitable for surgery or refractory to standard treatments. Although current evidence is limited and largely retrospective, reported outcomes support further prospective investigation. Mechanistically, ischemia-induced necrosis may be the underlying cause of tumor and symptom regression. Larger studies are needed to establish standalone embolization as a safe and effective meningioma treatment.
{"title":"Standalone Meningioma Embolization: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Ian C Odland, Lily Huo, Rui Feng, Halima Tabani, John Durbin, Thomas Perillo, Daryl Goldman, Bradley Delman, Melissa Umphlett, Christopher P Kellner, Tomoyoshi Shigematsu, Shahram Majidi, Reade A De Leacy, Johanna T Fifi, Alejandro Berenstein, J Mocco, Joshua B Bederson, Raj K Shrivastava, Benjamin I Rapoport","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000003933","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003933","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumors, with over 450 000 new cases each year. Although surgical resection remains the standard of care, recurrence occurs in up to 40% of cases. Reoperation poses additional risks due to anatomic changes and scar tissue. Elderly and frail patients experience increased rates of surgical morbidity, limiting treatment options. This study evaluates the potential of embolization, a technique traditionally used preoperatively to reduce intraoperative blood loss, as a definitive or palliative standalone treatment in select cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for System reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for studies reporting standalone meningioma embolization, defined as embolization without resection or radiotherapy for at least 2 months postprocedure. Two blinded reviewers screened articles using Covidence and conducted standardized data extraction. Variables collected included patient demographics, tumor characteristics, embolic agents, outcomes, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review identified 121 patients across 34 studies treated with standalone embolization. Of these, 67 patients had long-term follow-up. Symptomatic improvement was reported in 77 ± 6% of symptomatic patients, with radiographic tumor shrinkage observed in 84 ± 6%, and complete resolution seen in 5%. The major complication rate (5%) was comparable with that of preoperative embolization (3%-6%) and lower than that of surgical resection (7%-31%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Standalone embolization potentially represents a lower-risk alternative for meningioma patients unsuitable for surgery or refractory to standard treatments. Although current evidence is limited and largely retrospective, reported outcomes support further prospective investigation. Mechanistically, ischemia-induced necrosis may be the underlying cause of tumor and symptom regression. Larger studies are needed to establish standalone embolization as a safe and effective meningioma treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146143029","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}