In this paper, a novel human–robot collaboration (HRC) framework is proposed to enhance the capability of Supernumerary Robotic Limbs (SRLs). The proposed framework consists of three key modules: human motion intention recognition, disturbance rejection control, and obstacle avoidance, all of which are crucial for SRLs in the process of HRC. First, a motion intention method based on the autoregressive model is proposed to predict human motion, to improve task execution during HRC. Second, a control strategy based on a Tanh-type Barrier Lyapunov function is introduced to ensure bounded outputs and smooth operation in physical interactions with environment. Third, to enhance the collaboration between SRL and humans, dynamic obstacle avoidance based on human skeleton recognition and inverse kinematics is incorporated into the framework. The proposed framework is demonstrated by the human-SRL collaborative task, and the experimental results indicated that the performances can be improved with our framework.
{"title":"A Human–Robot Collaboration Control Framework for Supernumerary Robotic Limbs","authors":"Jing Luo, Xiangyu Zhou, Yifan Zhu, Yu Li, Chaoyi Zhang, Keao Wang, Zhaohong Mai, Chao Zeng","doi":"10.1002/rob.70025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.70025","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this paper, a novel human–robot collaboration (HRC) framework is proposed to enhance the capability of Supernumerary Robotic Limbs (SRLs). The proposed framework consists of three key modules: human motion intention recognition, disturbance rejection control, and obstacle avoidance, all of which are crucial for SRLs in the process of HRC. First, a motion intention method based on the autoregressive model is proposed to predict human motion, to improve task execution during HRC. Second, a control strategy based on a Tanh-type Barrier Lyapunov function is introduced to ensure bounded outputs and smooth operation in physical interactions with environment. Third, to enhance the collaboration between SRL and humans, dynamic obstacle avoidance based on human skeleton recognition and inverse kinematics is incorporated into the framework. The proposed framework is demonstrated by the human-SRL collaborative task, and the experimental results indicated that the performances can be improved with our framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":192,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Field Robotics","volume":"43 1","pages":"34-48"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/rob.70025","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145779352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Adedire D. Adesiji, Segun E. Ibitoye, Rasheedat M. Mahamood, Olalekan A. Olayemi, Peter O. Omoniyi, Tien-Chien Jen, Esther T. Akinlabi
An in-depth understanding of the risks related to robotic systems is crucial to guarantee safety throughout all stages of robot design and operations. This required a thorough risk assessment following international standards. This study presents a systematic review of previous research on safety considerations in the design of robotic systems, concentrating exclusively on peer-reviewed articles. A search method was developed to collect relevant articles, using keywords such as safety, fault, risk evaluation, safety evaluation, risk assessment, and ergonomics, among others. The keyword “robot” was utilized to bias the search results, which helped to narrow down collected articles to papers directly related to robotics. The risk assessment process includes recognizing machine shortcomings, recognizing threats, evaluating risk, and articulating a standardized computerized risk strategy. Mathematical analysis plays a crucial role in assessing the technical and social behavior of robots in different applications. Generally, injury associated with robots arises from errors during risk assessment. The Risk Ranking Number (HRN) is employed to quantify the degree of safety, incorporating factors like the possibility of occurrence and magnitude of potential hazard. In robot design, the main attention should be on minimizing/eradicating physical hazards and optimizing control mechanisms. Algorithms like force limitation and obstacle avoidance can minimize injury risk, especially during robot–human interactions. The review underscores the critical importance of establishing comprehensive risk assessment frameworks and utilizing safety models, algorithms, and functions as crucial tools to safeguard the integrity and security of robotic systems.
{"title":"Safety Considerations in Deployment of Robotic Systems – A Systematic Review","authors":"Adedire D. Adesiji, Segun E. Ibitoye, Rasheedat M. Mahamood, Olalekan A. Olayemi, Peter O. Omoniyi, Tien-Chien Jen, Esther T. Akinlabi","doi":"10.1002/rob.70022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.70022","url":null,"abstract":"<p>An in-depth understanding of the risks related to robotic systems is crucial to guarantee safety throughout all stages of robot design and operations. This required a thorough risk assessment following international standards. This study presents a systematic review of previous research on safety considerations in the design of robotic systems, concentrating exclusively on peer-reviewed articles. A search method was developed to collect relevant articles, using keywords such as safety, fault, risk evaluation, safety evaluation, risk assessment, and ergonomics, among others. The keyword “robot” was utilized to bias the search results, which helped to narrow down collected articles to papers directly related to robotics. The risk assessment process includes recognizing machine shortcomings, recognizing threats, evaluating risk, and articulating a standardized computerized risk strategy. Mathematical analysis plays a crucial role in assessing the technical and social behavior of robots in different applications. Generally, injury associated with robots arises from errors during risk assessment. The Risk Ranking Number (HRN) is employed to quantify the degree of safety, incorporating factors like the possibility of occurrence and magnitude of potential hazard. In robot design, the main attention should be on minimizing/eradicating physical hazards and optimizing control mechanisms. Algorithms like force limitation and obstacle avoidance can minimize injury risk, especially during robot–human interactions. The review underscores the critical importance of establishing comprehensive risk assessment frameworks and utilizing safety models, algorithms, and functions as crucial tools to safeguard the integrity and security of robotic systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":192,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Field Robotics","volume":"43 1","pages":"5-33"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/rob.70022","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145792473","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Stefan Paulus, Thomas Linkugel, Alireza Ahmadi, Chris McCool, Anne-Katrin Mahlein
Agriculture is undergoing a significant transformation process with the help of robots. Weeding robots have made their way into the market, and they play a crucial role in automating the weeding process in the field. This study introduces a generalized concept of autonomy levels for currently available weeding robots in the field as well as a comprehensive rating system that allows for a comparison of different weeding robots, irrespective of their developmental stages. We examine the different abilities of market-available robots, tractor implements, and smart weeding systems when it comes to navigating and recognizing crops and weeds in the field. A technological rating system is employed to rate the robots based on their advantages and critical aspects. To achieve this, we introduce a comparison system based on a measurable ability scale for the three important robot skills navigation, recognition, and target specificity. To demonstrate its applicability, we apply this system of robotic capability clustering to different available weeding system: the market-available self-propelled Farmdroid FD 20, the Farming GT, the experimental self-propelled research platform Bonn Bot, the market-available smart tractor implement Ecorobotix Ara, and the Bosch BASF Smart Sprayer. We discuss the outlook of interaction models from remote sensing and robots starting from swarm robot aspects to the spot farming, advantages, and limitations of GNSS- and vision-based robots, as well as current challenges for the use of robots in the field and try to answer the question how robots can support farmers in existing workflows.
{"title":"A Generalized Concept for Clustering Capabilities of Weeding Robots","authors":"Stefan Paulus, Thomas Linkugel, Alireza Ahmadi, Chris McCool, Anne-Katrin Mahlein","doi":"10.1002/rob.70030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.70030","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Agriculture is undergoing a significant transformation process with the help of robots. Weeding robots have made their way into the market, and they play a crucial role in automating the weeding process in the field. This study introduces a generalized concept of autonomy levels for currently available weeding robots in the field as well as a comprehensive rating system that allows for a comparison of different weeding robots, irrespective of their developmental stages. We examine the different abilities of market-available robots, tractor implements, and smart weeding systems when it comes to navigating and recognizing crops and weeds in the field. A technological rating system is employed to rate the robots based on their advantages and critical aspects. To achieve this, we introduce a comparison system based on a measurable ability scale for the three important robot skills navigation, recognition, and target specificity. To demonstrate its applicability, we apply this system of robotic capability clustering to different available weeding system: the market-available self-propelled Farmdroid FD 20, the Farming GT, the experimental self-propelled research platform Bonn Bot, the market-available smart tractor implement Ecorobotix Ara, and the Bosch BASF Smart Sprayer. We discuss the outlook of interaction models from remote sensing and robots starting from swarm robot aspects to the spot farming, advantages, and limitations of GNSS- and vision-based robots, as well as current challenges for the use of robots in the field and try to answer the question how robots can support farmers in existing workflows.</p>","PeriodicalId":192,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Field Robotics","volume":"43 1","pages":"49-62"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/rob.70030","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145779354","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}