Obesity Surgery最新文献

Introduction: Interdisciplinary guidelines recommend preoperative psychological evaluation before metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS). The Cleveland Clinic Behavioral Rating System (CCBRS) has been developed to evaluate the psychological state of individuals undergoing MBS. However, its predictive value concerning long-term weight loss and follow-up attendance has not been extensively studied. This study aims to assess the predictive value of the CCBRS regarding weight loss and follow-up attendance up to 5 years after MBS.

Methods: In this cohort study (n = 1236), psychologists administered the CCBRS to each patient prior to MBS in addition to the standard psychosocial-behavioral screening. The CCBRS consists of nine psychological domains and is scored on a five-point Likert scale, from "poor" to "excellent." Linear mixed models and ordinal regression analysis were used to analyze the percentage total weight loss over time and follow-up attendance up to 5 years after surgery.

Results: A total of 1086 patients underwent subsequent MBS. Significant differences in weight loss and follow-up attendance were observed between some CCBRS groups compared to the reference group "excellent." However, these differences were not consistent across all groups within any given domain.

Conclusion: In this cohort, the predictive value of the CCBRS for weight loss and follow-up attendance up to 5 years after MBS was limited. It is important to consider certain limitations, such as considerable loss to follow-up. Nevertheless, the CCBRS remains valuable for structured psychological assessments by helping to identify patients' strengths and areas needing improvement.

Background: We aimed to compare the omentopexy and clipping reinforcement methods performed along the staple line during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in terms of the effectiveness on postoperative bleeding.

Methods: In this prospective randomized controlled study, patients were divided into two groups: clips group (CG) and omentopexy group (OG). The groups were compared in terms of postoperative bleeding, duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, hospital readmissions in the postoperative first 30-days.

Results: A total of 148 patients were included in the study. Postoperative bleeding was observed in 11 patients (14.9%) of CG and 2 patients (2.7%) of the OG, and the difference between the groups was found to be significant (p = 0.009). Similarly, the number of patients with bleeding that did not require intervention was 9 (12.2%) in CG and 2 (2.7%) in OG, and the difference between the groups was also significant (p = 0.028). The duration of surgery in the CG was 30 (27 to 36) minutes, whereas in the OG, it was 43 (39 to 45) minutes, with a significant difference noted (p < 0.001). Additionally, the rate of patients readmitted to the hospital within the first 30 days was 16 (21.6%) in the CG and 7 (9.5%) in the OG, with a significant difference observed (p = 0.041).

Conclusion: In terms of bleeding requiring intervention, there was no difference between omentopexy and clipping techniques. In addition, omentopexy showed more satisfactory results than clipping in terms of non-interventional bleeding, but its clinical significance is unclear.

Obesity is a chronic disease that may require multiple interventions and escalation of therapy throughout the years. Until recently, no universal definition existed for recurrent weight gain and insufficient weight loss. Standardization of reporting is key so outcomes can be compared and data can be pooled. The recent IFSO consensus provided standard terminology and definitions that will likely resolve this in the future, and publishers will need to enforce for authors to use these definitions. This current IFSO position statement provides guidance for the management of recurrent weight gain after bariatric surgery.

This case report describes a pregnant woman who underwent a laparoscopic MiniMizer Gastric Ring procedure for clinically severe obesity only one month before conception. At 31 weeks of gestation, the patient as admitted to the hospital with postprandial vomiting and persistent left-sided colicky abdominal pain. Maternal abdominal MRI revealed an intestinal obstruction and elective surgery was recommended. Due to the considerable risk to the fetus, antenatal corticosteroids were immediately administered to promote lung maturation and magnesium sulfate was started for fetal neuroprotection. During an exploratory laparoscopy, significantly enlarged and ischemic intestinal loops were found, leading to the decision to perform an atraumatic "en caul" cesarean delivery. After a successful "en caul" delivery, the MiniMizer ring, which had dislodged downwards and led to mesenteric ischemia, was visualized. Intraoperative esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed a 1cm defect in the stomach wall related to gastric ring, covered with purulent exudate. Further exploration, showed a herniation of the distal alimentary loop through the Petersen foramen. Successful management included ring removal and intestinal loop reduction from the Petersen's space, without evidence of strangulation, as confirmed with indocyanine green (ICG) angiography. The postoperative course was uneventful. Women with obesity who have undergone bariatric surgery should to be informed of the increased likelihood of becoming pregnant after treatment. It is advised to notify the patient of the importance of maintaining a sufficient interval between bariatric surgery and conception. Additionally reports from the literature on various complications during pregnancy after bariatric surgery are presented.