Obesity Surgery最新文献

Purpose: Low socioeconomic status (SES) correlates with higher obesity rates and challenges in accessing treatments like bariatric surgery (BS). This study aims to assess SES's influence on medium-term BS outcomes in a setting of universal healthcare, ensuring equitable treatment access.

Material and methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 193 BS patients (1997-2018) at a tertiary care hospital. Weight loss was expressed as change in % total weight loss (%TWL) and excess body weight (EBW) loss. Successful BS was defined as > 50% EBW loss. SES was gauged using quartiles of the Spanish Deprivation Index. A multivariable Cox regression model evaluated SES impact on BS success over follow-up.

Results: The mean follow-up was 6.9 ± 4.6 years; patients averaged 43.9 ± 11.8 years, with 29.7% men. Preoperative BMI was 48.2 ± 8.2 kg/m². At follow-up, BMI was 33.9 ± 6.6 kg/m², with 29.3 ± 12.02% of %TWL. No SES quartile differences in BS success were noted at follow-up (log rank p = 0.960). Cox regression revealed no SES disparities in BS outcomes post-adjustment. However, female sex (HR 1.903; p = 0.009) and diabetes mellitus (HR = 0.504; p = 0.010) correlated with weight-related outcomes.

Conclusion: In a universal healthcare system with equitable treatment access, medium-term BS outcomes remain consistent irrespective of patients' socioeconomic status.

Introduction: Bariatric surgical techniques have demonstrated scientific efficacy and interventional safety; however, these approaches are not universally appropriate for all patients. The term "impenetrable abdomen" refers to the inability to achieve surgical access to the abdominal cavity, a condition that may arise from several underlying factors. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is proposed as a safe and effective technique in this subgroup of patients with obesity.

Materials and methods: A 56-year-old Caucasian woman with an impenetrable abdomen due to the presence of a large left paramedian laparocele underwent ESG (Fig. 1) to our unit. An abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a substantial laparocele in the left paramedian region, involving the tenuous loops, mesentery, and part of the transverse colon. The patient body mass index (BMI) at presentation was 47.15 kg/m² (116 kg per 1.57 m). Comorbidities included obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), requiring nocturnal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy, hepatic steatosis, hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, and hypovitaminosis D. The case was discussed with our multidisciplinary board team (MDT), who agreed to proceed with the ESG. The endoscopic procedure was performed in the supine position, using the Overstitch device and lasted 58 min. No intraprocedural or post-procedural complications/adverse events have been observed. The patient resumed a liquid diet on the first postoperative day and was discharged from the hospital 24 h after the procedure in good clinical condition.

Results: Regular outpatient follow-up visits showed significant reduction of the BMI at 6 months post-procedure with a value of 34.9 kg/m² compared with the initial value of 47.1 kg/m². Additionally, the patient's use of nocturnal CPAP for OSAS was successfully discontinued suggesting an improvement in her respiratory condition as a result of weight loss. Moreover, there was a notable reduction in the pharmacological management required for arterial hypertension. These outcomes underscore the positive impact of selecting the most appropriate therapeutic strategy for each patient with obesity through a multidisciplinary team approach.

Conclusion: In our experience, we confirm that endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty is both feasible and safe in patients presenting with an impenetrable abdomen. Despite the minimally invasive approach, this technique has proven effective in terms of body weight loss and reduction of obesity related compared with bariatric surgery.

Introduction: Despite Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) being the most commonly performed bariatric surgery today, studies with over 5 years of follow-up show that patients undergoing SG have inferior weight loss compared to those undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). The aim of this study was to examine differences in weight loss and the prevalence of weight regain between SG and RYGB up to 8 years after surgery.

Methods: Retrospective study including adult patients undergoing SG or RYGB between 2015 and 2018 at a tertiary center in Brazil. We evaluate the weight trajectory and pre- and postoperative behavior of type 2 diabetes (T2D), hypertension, and dyslipidemia. Differences betwen variables were tested using Student t-test, Mann-Whitney U, Pearson's chi-square or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. The level of significance adopted was p < 0,005.

Results: Among 591 patients (40 ± 10 years; baseline body mass index 41.7 [IQR 39.1-45]; 83% women), 327 underwent RYGB (55%) and 264 SG (45%). Preoperatively, 14% had T2D, 40% hypertension, and 53% dyslipidemia. The mean total percentage of weight loss was higher in the RYGB group after 8 years: 32% compared to 19% after SG (difference 13%, p < 0.004). At 8 years, weight regain was also lower in RYGB (23%) compared to SG (39%) (p < 0.001). At 5 years postoperatively, the remission rates for T2D, hypertension, and dyslipidemia were 63%, 42%, and 51%, respectively, among the patients who remained in follow-up.

Conclusions: Patients undergoing RYGB showed greater weight loss and less weight regain 8 years after bariatric surgery compared to those undergoing SG.

Purpose: Although noninvasive tests can be used to predict liver fibrosis, their accuracy is limited for patients with severe obesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We developed machine learning (ML) models to predict significant liver fibrosis in patients with severe obesity through noninvasive tests.

Materials and methods: This prospective study included 194 patients with severe obesity who underwent wedge liver biopsy and metabolic bariatric surgery at Taipei Medical University Hospital between September 2016 and December 2020. Significant liver fibrosis was defined as a fibrosis score ≥ 2. Patients were randomly divided into a training group (70%) and a validation group (30%). ML models, including support vector machine, random forest, k-nearest neighbor, XGBoost, and logistic regression, were trained to predict significant liver fibrosis, using DM status, AST, ALT, ultrasonographic fibrosis scores, and liver stiffness measurements (LSM). An ensemble model including these ML models was also used for prediction.

Results: Among the ML models, the XGBoost model exhibited the highest AUROC of 0.77, with a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 61.5%, 75.8%, and 69.5%, in validation set, while LSM, AST, ALT showed strongest effects on the model. The ensemble model outperformed all ML models in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 73.1%, 90.9%, and 83.1%.

Conclusion: For patients with severe obesity and NAFLD, the XGBoost model and the ensemble model exhibit high predictive performance for significant liver fibrosis. These models may be used to screen for significant liver fibrosis in this patient group and monitor treatment response after metabolic bariatric surgery.

It is well-established that extending either the biliopancreatic limb (BPL), the alimentary limb (AL), or both, results in increased combined bypass (CB) length, which in turn leads to enhanced weight loss and potential nutritional deficiencies due to heightened malabsorptive effects. However, a key question remains: Assuming no change in CB length, does altering BPL length affect outcomes? To address this question, we examined studies comparing long BPL and long AL (short BPL) while maintaining equal or nearly equal CB lengths. We conducted this systematic literature review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We performed a meta-analysis on weight loss outcomes, adverse events and safety-related outcomes, gastrointestinal complaints, and nutritional outcomes at the 2-year mark.

Background: Bariatric surgery is underutilized as a treatment for metabolic disease and its associated comorbidities. While social support is known to play a crucial role in outcomes following bariatric surgery, little is known about the role of social support prior to surgery, which may impact preparedness for and willingness to undergo surgery. The study's objective was to examine the role of informal social support prior to bariatric surgery, the types of support received, and patient attitudes toward different demonstrations of support.

Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with patients who had previously undergone bariatric surgery (n = 20) from two high-volume bariatric surgery centers. Interviews focused on patient engagement with and attitudes about social support during the preoperative process. Transcripts from each interview were iteratively analyzed through steps informed by deductive and inductive thematic analysis.

Results: Four major themes emerged characterizing social support among patients undergoing bariatric surgery: (1) emotional support, (2) instrumental support, (3) informational support, and (4) self-support. Examples of meaningful support participants received included "cheerleading" (i.e., unconditional encouragement), advice from role models who had previously undergone surgery (e.g., receiving information on the process), shared experiences with loved ones regarding dietary and activity modifications (e.g., exercising with friends), and self-support measures (e.g., seeking therapy).

Conclusions: A comprehensive understanding of how patients receive informal social support can offer valuable insights for individuals considering surgery. Further, such knowledge may enable providers to effectively counsel patients through the decision-making process and to ensure the establishment of support systems both pre- and post-surgery.