Background: Compared to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, cases of dumping syndrome (DS) occur significantly less frequently after one anastomosis gastric bypass due to the longer gastric pouch. Recent studies have proposed supplementation of gastric bypass with modified fundoplication using the excluded part of the stomach; however, only a few cases have been reported, as this is often performed in revision surgeries. This study aimed to compare the incidence of early and late DS after "FundoRingOAGB" and standard one anastomosis gastric bypass by assessing the OGTT, insulin levels, and Sigstad scores as outcome measures.
Materials and methods: This was a single-center, prospective, interventional, open-label (no masking) RCT (FundoRing Trial) with a 1-year follow-up period. The endpoints were oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT), insulin levels, Sigstad scores, early and late DS symptoms.
Results: Overall,1000 patients (n=500 FundoRing One-anastomosis gastric bypass [f-OAGB] vs. n=500 standard OAGB [s-OAGB]) with complete follow-up data were included in the study. No leaks, bleeding, or mortality occurred in either group. At 1-year, BMI in the f-OAGB group was 27.0 ± 0.75 vs. 29.0 ± 0.66 s-OAGB group (p=0.04). DS symptoms were observed in 98 (19.6%) and 175 (35%) patients in the f-OAGB and s-OAGB groups, respectively (P =0.001). Sigstad's scores for the f-OAGB and s-OAGB groups were 2.8 ± 0.9 and 5.1 ± 1.3, respectively (p=0.001).
Conclusion: Modified fundoplication of the OAGB-excluded stomach significantly decreased early and late DS symptoms more effectively than standard OAGB at 1 year.
背景:与Roux-en-Y胃旁路术相比,由于胃袋较长,一次吻合胃旁路术后倾倒综合征(DS)的发生率明显降低。最近的研究提出了胃旁路术的补充,改良的胃底复制术使用胃的被排除的部分;然而,只有少数病例被报道,因为这通常在翻修手术中进行。本研究旨在通过评估OGTT、胰岛素水平和Sigstad评分作为结局指标,比较“FundoRingOAGB”和标准一吻合术胃旁路术后早期和晚期DS的发生率。材料和方法:这是一项单中心、前瞻性、干预性、开放标签(无掩蔽)随机对照试验(FundoRing Trial),随访1年。终点是口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)、胰岛素水平、Sigstad评分、早期和晚期退行性痴呆症状。结果:总的来说,1000例患者(n=500名funding one -吻合式胃旁路[f-OAGB] vs. n=500名标准OAGB [s-OAGB])纳入研究,随访资料完整。两组均未发生渗漏、出血或死亡。1年时,f-OAGB组的BMI为27.0±0.75,s-OAGB组为29.0±0.66 (p=0.04)。f-OAGB组和s-OAGB组分别有98例(19.6%)和175例(35%)出现退行性痴呆症状(P =0.001)。f-OAGB组和s-OAGB组的Sigstad评分分别为2.8±0.9和5.1±1.3分(p=0.001)。结论:改良的不含OAGB的胃底瓣比标准OAGB更有效地减少了1年的早期和晚期DS症状。
{"title":"Comparison of Dumping Syndrome After FundoRing and Standard One-anastomosis Gastric Bypass: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Oral Ospanov, Laura Danyarova, Kassymkhan Sultanov, Galymjan Duysenov, Nurlan Zharov, Bakhtiyar Yelembayev, Shakhizada Ospanova","doi":"10.1007/s11695-025-08416-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-025-08416-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Compared to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, cases of dumping syndrome (DS) occur significantly less frequently after one anastomosis gastric bypass due to the longer gastric pouch. Recent studies have proposed supplementation of gastric bypass with modified fundoplication using the excluded part of the stomach; however, only a few cases have been reported, as this is often performed in revision surgeries. This study aimed to compare the incidence of early and late DS after \"FundoRingOAGB\" and standard one anastomosis gastric bypass by assessing the OGTT, insulin levels, and Sigstad scores as outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a single-center, prospective, interventional, open-label (no masking) RCT (FundoRing Trial) with a 1-year follow-up period. The endpoints were oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT), insulin levels, Sigstad scores, early and late DS symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall,1000 patients (n=500 FundoRing One-anastomosis gastric bypass [f-OAGB] vs. n=500 standard OAGB [s-OAGB]) with complete follow-up data were included in the study. No leaks, bleeding, or mortality occurred in either group. At 1-year, BMI in the f-OAGB group was 27.0 ± 0.75 vs. 29.0 ± 0.66 s-OAGB group (p=0.04). DS symptoms were observed in 98 (19.6%) and 175 (35%) patients in the f-OAGB and s-OAGB groups, respectively (P =0.001). Sigstad's scores for the f-OAGB and s-OAGB groups were 2.8 ± 0.9 and 5.1 ± 1.3, respectively (p=0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Modified fundoplication of the OAGB-excluded stomach significantly decreased early and late DS symptoms more effectively than standard OAGB at 1 year.</p>","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145669380","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Rectus sheath block (RSB) provides reliable anesthesia to the anteromedial abdominal wall and may offer effective pain control following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). This study aimed to compare the efficacy of RSB versus local infiltration analgesia (LIA), hypothesizing that RSB would provide superior pain relief.
Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, patients with obesity undergoing LSG received either bilateral ultrasound-guided RSB performed by an anesthesiologist or LIA administered by a surgeon, following anesthesia induction. The primary outcome was intraoperative fentanyl consumption. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores [Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), 0-10], cumulative morphine consumption, and recovery metrics over 48 h.
Results: Sixty-nine patients were analyzed (RSB: 35; LIA: 34). Intraoperative fentanyl use was lower with RSB (median difference: - 25 mcg; 95% CI: - 50 to 0; p = 0.008). RSB reduced pain scores at rest at 0 h (-2 points; p = 0.001), 1 h (-1 point; p = 0.009), and 12 h (-1 point; p = 0.022), and pain during movement at 0 h (-3 points; p < 0.001), 12 h (-1 point; p = 0.043), and 36 h (-1 point; p = 0.019). Pain scores were otherwise comparable. Fewer RSB patients reported moderate-to-severe pain at 0 h and 1 h (rest: p = 0.006 and 0.019; movement: p < 0.001 and 0.033). Postoperative morphine use and recovery metrics were similar between groups.
Conclusion: Pre-incisional RSB demonstrated an intraoperative opioid-sparing effect and superior early postoperative analgesia compared with LIA, supporting its role as a component of multimodal analgesia for LSG.
{"title":"Analgesic Effect of Rectus Sheath Block Versus Local Infiltration Analgesia in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Artid Samerchua, Kanokkan Tepmalai, Bandhuphat Chakrabandhu, Kittitorn Supphapipat, Panuwat Lapisatepun, Prangmalee Leurcharusmee, Kullaphun Prapussarakul, Thidarut Jinadech, Kotchakorn Jungsakulrujirek, Mullika Wanvoharn","doi":"10.1007/s11695-025-08405-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-025-08405-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rectus sheath block (RSB) provides reliable anesthesia to the anteromedial abdominal wall and may offer effective pain control following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). This study aimed to compare the efficacy of RSB versus local infiltration analgesia (LIA), hypothesizing that RSB would provide superior pain relief.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized controlled trial, patients with obesity undergoing LSG received either bilateral ultrasound-guided RSB performed by an anesthesiologist or LIA administered by a surgeon, following anesthesia induction. The primary outcome was intraoperative fentanyl consumption. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores [Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), 0-10], cumulative morphine consumption, and recovery metrics over 48 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-nine patients were analyzed (RSB: 35; LIA: 34). Intraoperative fentanyl use was lower with RSB (median difference: - 25 mcg; 95% CI: - 50 to 0; p = 0.008). RSB reduced pain scores at rest at 0 h (-2 points; p = 0.001), 1 h (-1 point; p = 0.009), and 12 h (-1 point; p = 0.022), and pain during movement at 0 h (-3 points; p < 0.001), 12 h (-1 point; p = 0.043), and 36 h (-1 point; p = 0.019). Pain scores were otherwise comparable. Fewer RSB patients reported moderate-to-severe pain at 0 h and 1 h (rest: p = 0.006 and 0.019; movement: p < 0.001 and 0.033). Postoperative morphine use and recovery metrics were similar between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pre-incisional RSB demonstrated an intraoperative opioid-sparing effect and superior early postoperative analgesia compared with LIA, supporting its role as a component of multimodal analgesia for LSG.</p>","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145677663","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-03DOI: 10.1007/s11695-025-08406-2
Seyed Amirhossein Fazeli, Mamdouh I Elamy, Hamed Soleimani Samarkhazan
Recurrent weight gain after metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) threatens the durability of metabolic and renal benefits, yet its intricate relationship with kidney function remains underexplored. This review synthesizes evidence that weight regain (≥ 20% from nadir weight) reactivates obesity-driven kidney injury pathways, including glomerular hyperfiltration, lipotoxicity (toxic damage from lipid overload), and NOD-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome activation (an immune complex driving inflammation). Consequently, albuminuria recurs in 20-35% of patients and eGFR decline accelerates. Procedure-specific dynamics modulate outcomes. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) offers superior kidney protection despite moderate regain (5.3-37% at 7 years). In contrast, sleeve gastrectomy (SG) shows higher regain (26.3-76% at 6 years) and weaker renal improvements. Critically, weight recurrence reactivates transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β)/mothers against decapentaplegic homolog (SMAD) and Wnt/β-catenin fibrotic signaling, driving ectopic renal fat reaccumulation and tubular injury. Emerging strategies, including glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists (27% albuminuria reduction) and endoscopic revisions, show promise in mitigating renal sequelae. However, definitional heterogeneity in weight regain and insufficient phenotyping of kidney-specific biomarkers impede clinical translation. This review underscores the urgency of personalized interventions to preserve kidney health in the context of post-bariatric weight recurrence, advocating for multidisciplinary approaches and future research into novel antifibrotic therapies.
{"title":"Recurrent Weight Gain after Metabolic Bariatric Surgery (MBS): Emerging Insights on Kidney Function.","authors":"Seyed Amirhossein Fazeli, Mamdouh I Elamy, Hamed Soleimani Samarkhazan","doi":"10.1007/s11695-025-08406-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-025-08406-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recurrent weight gain after metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) threatens the durability of metabolic and renal benefits, yet its intricate relationship with kidney function remains underexplored. This review synthesizes evidence that weight regain (≥ 20% from nadir weight) reactivates obesity-driven kidney injury pathways, including glomerular hyperfiltration, lipotoxicity (toxic damage from lipid overload), and NOD-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome activation (an immune complex driving inflammation). Consequently, albuminuria recurs in 20-35% of patients and eGFR decline accelerates. Procedure-specific dynamics modulate outcomes. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) offers superior kidney protection despite moderate regain (5.3-37% at 7 years). In contrast, sleeve gastrectomy (SG) shows higher regain (26.3-76% at 6 years) and weaker renal improvements. Critically, weight recurrence reactivates transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β)/mothers against decapentaplegic homolog (SMAD) and Wnt/β-catenin fibrotic signaling, driving ectopic renal fat reaccumulation and tubular injury. Emerging strategies, including glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists (27% albuminuria reduction) and endoscopic revisions, show promise in mitigating renal sequelae. However, definitional heterogeneity in weight regain and insufficient phenotyping of kidney-specific biomarkers impede clinical translation. This review underscores the urgency of personalized interventions to preserve kidney health in the context of post-bariatric weight recurrence, advocating for multidisciplinary approaches and future research into novel antifibrotic therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145669340","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
With the rising incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) worldwide, the search for effective treatments has become an important direction of contemporary medical research. Bariatric metabolic surgery, as a new therapeutic approach, has made remarkable progress in improving T2DM in recent years. In this paper, we collected studies on the mechanisms by which metabolic surgery improves T2DM by altering the intestinal flora and its metabolites in the last 5 years, and systematically analysed the effects of different weight loss surgeries, such as gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy, on the composition of the intestinal flora. Then, the changes in the metabolites of the flora triggered by these surgeries and the possible downstream molecular mechanisms were explored. Although it has been revealed that the intestinal flora is altered by bacterial genera after metabolic surgery, the downstream mechanisms remain unclear. The aim of this review is to provide a new perspective for a deeper understanding of the microbiological mechanisms of metabolic surgery for T2DM and to provide a theoretical basis for future microbiome-based therapeutic strategies.
{"title":"The Role of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy in Improving Type 2 Diabetes Through Modulation of Gut Microbiota and Metabolites.","authors":"Zhi-Ming Wang, Cheng-Jun He, Jie Hou, Si-Qi Zhang, Hong-Bin Zhang, Liang-Ping Wu","doi":"10.1007/s11695-025-08421-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-025-08421-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the rising incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) worldwide, the search for effective treatments has become an important direction of contemporary medical research. Bariatric metabolic surgery, as a new therapeutic approach, has made remarkable progress in improving T2DM in recent years. In this paper, we collected studies on the mechanisms by which metabolic surgery improves T2DM by altering the intestinal flora and its metabolites in the last 5 years, and systematically analysed the effects of different weight loss surgeries, such as gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy, on the composition of the intestinal flora. Then, the changes in the metabolites of the flora triggered by these surgeries and the possible downstream molecular mechanisms were explored. Although it has been revealed that the intestinal flora is altered by bacterial genera after metabolic surgery, the downstream mechanisms remain unclear. The aim of this review is to provide a new perspective for a deeper understanding of the microbiological mechanisms of metabolic surgery for T2DM and to provide a theoretical basis for future microbiome-based therapeutic strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145661796","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Although laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) effectively addresses obesity, its outcomes on hyperuricemia (HUA) remission remain inconsistent. We aimed to identify baseline predictors and develop a nomogram for HUA persistence six months following LSG.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with obesity and HUA undergoing primary LSG at Huashan Hospital. An independent validation cohort from the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University was included. Clinical data, including demographics, anthropometric measurements, and biochemical markers were analyzed. Logistic regression analyses identified independent predictors of persistent HUA, and a predictive nomogram was developed and externally validated.
Results: A total of 631 patients was enrolled in this study. Persistent HUA was observed in 41.8% (159/380) of patients in the training cohort. Multivariate analysis identified male sex (OR = 4.97, 95% CI: 2.35-10.51, P < 0.001), waist circumference (WC; OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.02-1.10, P = 0.006), and baseline UA levels (OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 1.01-1.02, P < 0.001) as significant predictors. The nomogram demonstrated excellent discriminative ability (AUC = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.82-0.86) and calibration. In the validation cohort, persistent HUA was observed in 35.5% (89/251), and the nomogram maintained robust predictive performance (AUC = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.76-0.82).
Conclusion: Male sex, increased WC, and elevated baseline UA predict postoperative persistent HUA. The nomogram provides a practical clinical tool for predicting short-term HUA non-remission post-LSG.
{"title":"Baseline Risk Factors and Predictive Nomogram for Short-Term Persistent Hyperuricemia Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Dual Center Study.","authors":"Yuxiao Chu, Jian Wang, Chong Cao, Qiyuan Yao, Yian Zhao, Qiwei Shen, Bo Xu, Jian Hong, Xiaojian Fu, Xiaocheng Zhu, Yikai Shao, Libin Yao, Rong Hua","doi":"10.1007/s11695-025-08353-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11695-025-08353-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) effectively addresses obesity, its outcomes on hyperuricemia (HUA) remission remain inconsistent. We aimed to identify baseline predictors and develop a nomogram for HUA persistence six months following LSG.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed patients with obesity and HUA undergoing primary LSG at Huashan Hospital. An independent validation cohort from the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University was included. Clinical data, including demographics, anthropometric measurements, and biochemical markers were analyzed. Logistic regression analyses identified independent predictors of persistent HUA, and a predictive nomogram was developed and externally validated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 631 patients was enrolled in this study. Persistent HUA was observed in 41.8% (159/380) of patients in the training cohort. Multivariate analysis identified male sex (OR = 4.97, 95% CI: 2.35-10.51, P < 0.001), waist circumference (WC; OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.02-1.10, P = 0.006), and baseline UA levels (OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 1.01-1.02, P < 0.001) as significant predictors. The nomogram demonstrated excellent discriminative ability (AUC = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.82-0.86) and calibration. In the validation cohort, persistent HUA was observed in 35.5% (89/251), and the nomogram maintained robust predictive performance (AUC = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.76-0.82).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Male sex, increased WC, and elevated baseline UA predict postoperative persistent HUA. The nomogram provides a practical clinical tool for predicting short-term HUA non-remission post-LSG.</p>","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"5288-5297"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145422292","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-08-28DOI: 10.1007/s11695-025-08191-y
Mohamed Hany, Mohamed H Zidan
{"title":"Re: Comments on Article \"Fixation of the Esophagus to Diaphragmatic Hiatus as a Routine Step in Hiatal Hernia Repair During Bariatric Surgery: How to Do It?\"","authors":"Mohamed Hany, Mohamed H Zidan","doi":"10.1007/s11695-025-08191-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11695-025-08191-y","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"5641-5642"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144963453","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-09-08DOI: 10.1007/s11695-025-08236-2
Suman Rani, Jaibir Singh, Sulochana Devi
{"title":"Comment on \"Evaluating Protein Liquid Supplementation for Enhanced Protein Intake and Adherence at Short-Term After Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial\".","authors":"Suman Rani, Jaibir Singh, Sulochana Devi","doi":"10.1007/s11695-025-08236-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11695-025-08236-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"5647-5648"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145023831","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-11-18DOI: 10.1007/s11695-025-08344-z
Walid El Ansari, Mohamed Hany
{"title":"Reflux After One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: Why The Debates Remain? An Agenda For Action and Call For Collaboration.","authors":"Walid El Ansari, Mohamed Hany","doi":"10.1007/s11695-025-08344-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11695-025-08344-z","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"5546-5549"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145541436","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1007/s11695-025-08397-0
Violeta Moizé, Lucia Alonso, Jessica Farré, Joan Fernando, Héloïse Toffaloni da Cunha, Roger Canals, Joana Garcia Ortiz, Joan Escarrabill
{"title":"Correction: Visual Expressions of Patient's Perceptions of Obesity-Related Stigma Through Drawing.","authors":"Violeta Moizé, Lucia Alonso, Jessica Farré, Joan Fernando, Héloïse Toffaloni da Cunha, Roger Canals, Joana Garcia Ortiz, Joan Escarrabill","doi":"10.1007/s11695-025-08397-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11695-025-08397-0","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"5397"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145534545","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-10-20DOI: 10.1007/s11695-025-08273-x
Mohamed Elshawy, Sherif Albalkiny, Ramy Helmy, Derar Jaradat, Ahmed S M Omar, Mostafa Mahmoud Salama, Mohamed Gamal Qassem
Background: Sleeve gastrectomy becomes increasingly popular worldwide, with ongoing efforts to minimize abdominal trauma and postoperative pain and enhance aesthetic outcomes. Bikini line sleeve gastrectomy (BLSG) is a novel technique that achieves improved cosmetic results while maintaining the fundamental goal of effective weight loss. We aim to evaluate the feasibility and safety of three-port bikini sleeve gastrectomy in achieving both aesthetic satisfaction and weight reduction.
Methods: A prospective cohort study included 85 patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy between October 2018 and October 2019 at Ain Shams University Hospitals, with 24-month follow-up. Based on BMI and defined anthropometric criteria, patients were allocated to Group I (n = 40), who underwent laparoscopic bikini line sleeve gastrectomy (BLSG), while Group II (n = 45), who underwent conventional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Outcomes assessed included patient satisfaction with scar appearance, percentage of excess weight loss, and early and late postoperative complications. Statistical analyses used chi-square and t-tests, with significance at p < 0.05.
Results: There was no statistically significant difference in weight loss outcomes between groups at any of the measured time points (6, 12, 18, and 24 months). The bikini line sleeve gastrectomy group reported significantly higher satisfaction with scar appearance. Despite the modest ergonomic challenges of the lower abdominal access in the bikini group, BLSG demonstrated low complication rates, confirming its safety.
Conclusions: In appropriately selected patients, three-port bikini line sleeve gastrectomy demonstrates a favourable safety profile and significantly enhances patient satisfaction while maintaining comparable clinical efficacy. Large multicentre randomized trials are warranted to further validate these outcomes. Key Points • In selected patients, three-port BLSG is reliable technique without compromising weight loss efficacy. • Three-port BLSG provides enhanced cosmetic satisfaction for patients prioritizing aesthetic outcomes. • With proper patient selection, the procedure can be safely integrated into routine practice • Future advancements in technique and instrumentation may broaden the application of three-port BLSG to patients with higher BMI and larger abdominal dimensions.
{"title":"Three-Port Bikini Line vs. Conventional Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Prospective Cohort Study on Safety, Efficacy, and Aesthetic Outcomes.","authors":"Mohamed Elshawy, Sherif Albalkiny, Ramy Helmy, Derar Jaradat, Ahmed S M Omar, Mostafa Mahmoud Salama, Mohamed Gamal Qassem","doi":"10.1007/s11695-025-08273-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11695-025-08273-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sleeve gastrectomy becomes increasingly popular worldwide, with ongoing efforts to minimize abdominal trauma and postoperative pain and enhance aesthetic outcomes. Bikini line sleeve gastrectomy (BLSG) is a novel technique that achieves improved cosmetic results while maintaining the fundamental goal of effective weight loss. We aim to evaluate the feasibility and safety of three-port bikini sleeve gastrectomy in achieving both aesthetic satisfaction and weight reduction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study included 85 patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy between October 2018 and October 2019 at Ain Shams University Hospitals, with 24-month follow-up. Based on BMI and defined anthropometric criteria, patients were allocated to Group I (n = 40), who underwent laparoscopic bikini line sleeve gastrectomy (BLSG), while Group II (n = 45), who underwent conventional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Outcomes assessed included patient satisfaction with scar appearance, percentage of excess weight loss, and early and late postoperative complications. Statistical analyses used chi-square and t-tests, with significance at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistically significant difference in weight loss outcomes between groups at any of the measured time points (6, 12, 18, and 24 months). The bikini line sleeve gastrectomy group reported significantly higher satisfaction with scar appearance. Despite the modest ergonomic challenges of the lower abdominal access in the bikini group, BLSG demonstrated low complication rates, confirming its safety.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In appropriately selected patients, three-port bikini line sleeve gastrectomy demonstrates a favourable safety profile and significantly enhances patient satisfaction while maintaining comparable clinical efficacy. Large multicentre randomized trials are warranted to further validate these outcomes. Key Points • In selected patients, three-port BLSG is reliable technique without compromising weight loss efficacy. • Three-port BLSG provides enhanced cosmetic satisfaction for patients prioritizing aesthetic outcomes. • With proper patient selection, the procedure can be safely integrated into routine practice • Future advancements in technique and instrumentation may broaden the application of three-port BLSG to patients with higher BMI and larger abdominal dimensions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"5038-5046"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145329726","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}