首页 > 最新文献

NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine最新文献

英文 中文
Assessing competence of primary care respiratory healthcare professionals to deliver a psychologically-based intervention for people with COPD: results from the TANDEM study. 评估基层呼吸科医护人员为慢性阻塞性肺病患者提供心理干预的能力:TANDEM 研究的结果。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Pub Date : 2025-03-02 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-025-00416-y
V Wileman, L Steed, H Pinnock, M Kelly, R Sohanpal, K Heslop-Marshall, Sjc Taylor

Management of long-term conditions is a significant challenge in contemporary health care as people often require support for both physical and psychological symptoms. Assessing the competence of healthcare professionals delivering psychologically informed interventions informs decisions about future implementation. This is a comprehensive intervention fidelity assessment nested within a randomised controlled trial. We developed a bespoke intervention fidelity assessment framework to assess the competence of primary care respiratory nurses, physiotherapists and occupational therapists delivering a cognitive behavioural intervention for people with COPD. A total of 180 (representing 15% of trial cases) intervention audio files, from 36 intervention arm participants, were coded. The intervention was delivered with acceptable adherence for most components. Therapeutic competency was achieved and comparable with previous research studies. Interpersonal skills and focus had higher competency whilst guided discovery and application of appropriate change techniques was lower but still adequate. Skills improved over time and with an increased number of clients. With proper training and supervision, primary care respiratory nurses, physiotherapists and occupational therapists can deliver cognitive behavioural interventions with acceptable therapeutic competency but questioning and change techniques may need particular focus in training and greater practice.

长期疾病的管理是当代卫生保健中的一项重大挑战,因为人们往往需要对身体和心理症状提供支持。评估医疗保健专业人员提供心理知情干预的能力,为未来实施的决策提供信息。这是一项随机对照试验中的综合干预保真度评估。我们开发了一个定制的干预保真度评估框架,以评估初级保健呼吸护士、物理治疗师和职业治疗师为COPD患者提供认知行为干预的能力。来自36个干预组参与者的总共180个(占试验案例的15%)干预音频文件被编码。大多数干预措施的依从性都是可以接受的。达到治疗能力,并与以往的研究相当。人际交往能力和专注力较强,而引导发现和应用适当的变革技术较低,但仍然足够。随着时间的推移和客户数量的增加,技能也在不断提高。通过适当的培训和监督,初级保健呼吸护士、物理治疗师和职业治疗师可以提供具有可接受的治疗能力的认知行为干预,但质疑和改变技术可能需要特别关注培训和更多的实践。
{"title":"Assessing competence of primary care respiratory healthcare professionals to deliver a psychologically-based intervention for people with COPD: results from the TANDEM study.","authors":"V Wileman, L Steed, H Pinnock, M Kelly, R Sohanpal, K Heslop-Marshall, Sjc Taylor","doi":"10.1038/s41533-025-00416-y","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s41533-025-00416-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Management of long-term conditions is a significant challenge in contemporary health care as people often require support for both physical and psychological symptoms. Assessing the competence of healthcare professionals delivering psychologically informed interventions informs decisions about future implementation. This is a comprehensive intervention fidelity assessment nested within a randomised controlled trial. We developed a bespoke intervention fidelity assessment framework to assess the competence of primary care respiratory nurses, physiotherapists and occupational therapists delivering a cognitive behavioural intervention for people with COPD. A total of 180 (representing 15% of trial cases) intervention audio files, from 36 intervention arm participants, were coded. The intervention was delivered with acceptable adherence for most components. Therapeutic competency was achieved and comparable with previous research studies. Interpersonal skills and focus had higher competency whilst guided discovery and application of appropriate change techniques was lower but still adequate. Skills improved over time and with an increased number of clients. With proper training and supervision, primary care respiratory nurses, physiotherapists and occupational therapists can deliver cognitive behavioural interventions with acceptable therapeutic competency but questioning and change techniques may need particular focus in training and greater practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":"35 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11873302/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143536973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Burden of illness among patients with asthma prescribed inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β2-agonists. 哮喘患者吸入皮质类固醇/长效β2激动剂的疾病负担
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-024-00402-w
Shiyuan Zhang, Alexandrosz Czira, Julia Harley, Kieran J Rothnie, Lauren Lee, Mark Small

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) plus long-acting β2-agonists (LABA) are recommended for maintenance-only or maintenance and reliever therapy (MART) in patients with asthma. However, real-world data on ICS/LABA as maintenance-only or MART are limited. This study characterized clinical, economic, and humanistic burdens of asthma in Canada, China, Europe, Japan, and the US, using data collected from patients and physicians via a cross-sectional survey (Asthma Disease Specific Programme). Patients were ≥18 years of age with physician-confirmed asthma and receiving fixed-dose ICS/LABA for ≥3 months. Mean physician-reported symptom-free days over the past 30 days ranged from 10.1-20.6 days, and 31.5-34.6% of ICS/LABA users self-reported not well-controlled asthma. SABA co-prescription was reported in 8.8-67.8% of patients. These findings highlight the continued disease burden among ICS/LABA users, with the high level of SABA co-prescription indicating potentially inappropriate prescribing of ICS/LABA as MART or detrimental reliance on SABA medication in addition to MART.

吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)加长效β2激动剂(LABA)被推荐用于哮喘患者仅维持或维持和缓解治疗(MART)。但是,ICS/LABA的实际数据仅用于维护或MART是有限的。本研究通过横断面调查(哮喘疾病特定计划)从患者和医生那里收集数据,分析了加拿大、中国、欧洲、日本和美国哮喘的临床、经济和人文负担。患者年龄≥18岁,经医生确诊为哮喘,接受固定剂量ICS/LABA治疗≥3个月。在过去30天内,医生报告的平均无症状天数为10.1-20.6天,31.5-34.6%的ICS/LABA使用者自我报告哮喘控制不佳。8.8-67.8%的患者报告了SABA联合处方。这些发现强调了ICS/LABA使用者中持续存在的疾病负担,高水平的SABA联合处方表明ICS/LABA作为MART的处方可能不适当,或者除了MART之外对SABA药物的有害依赖。
{"title":"Burden of illness among patients with asthma prescribed inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β<sub>2</sub>-agonists.","authors":"Shiyuan Zhang, Alexandrosz Czira, Julia Harley, Kieran J Rothnie, Lauren Lee, Mark Small","doi":"10.1038/s41533-024-00402-w","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s41533-024-00402-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) plus long-acting β<sub>2</sub>-agonists (LABA) are recommended for maintenance-only or maintenance and reliever therapy (MART) in patients with asthma. However, real-world data on ICS/LABA as maintenance-only or MART are limited. This study characterized clinical, economic, and humanistic burdens of asthma in Canada, China, Europe, Japan, and the US, using data collected from patients and physicians via a cross-sectional survey (Asthma Disease Specific Programme). Patients were ≥18 years of age with physician-confirmed asthma and receiving fixed-dose ICS/LABA for ≥3 months. Mean physician-reported symptom-free days over the past 30 days ranged from 10.1-20.6 days, and 31.5-34.6% of ICS/LABA users self-reported not well-controlled asthma. SABA co-prescription was reported in 8.8-67.8% of patients. These findings highlight the continued disease burden among ICS/LABA users, with the high level of SABA co-prescription indicating potentially inappropriate prescribing of ICS/LABA as MART or detrimental reliance on SABA medication in addition to MART.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":"35 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11865622/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143516275","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trends in low global warming potential inhaler prescribing: A UK-wide cohort comparison from 2018-2024. 低全球变暖潜势吸入器处方的趋势:2018-2024年英国范围内的队列比较
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-025-00415-z
Simon M Barry, Gareth R Davies, Julian Forton, Sarah Williams, Richard Thomas, Paul Paxton, Grace Moore, Chris R Davies

We performed a retrospective cohort analysis comparing trends in low global warming potential (GWP) inhaler prescribing in primary care in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland between 2018 and 2024 using national prescribing data. There was little change in England, a reduction from 36.6-31.0% in Scotland, a reduction from 36.7-33.2% in Northern Ireland, and an increase from 30.8-41.1% in Wales. Only in Wales was there a simultaneous reduction in high GWP inhalers and an increase in low GWP inhalers. Over the time period of the study there has been a saving of 20,303 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent in Wales.

我们使用国家处方数据进行了回顾性队列分析,比较了2018年至2024年间英格兰、苏格兰、威尔士和北爱尔兰初级保健中低全球变暖潜值(GWP)吸入器处方的趋势。英格兰变化不大,苏格兰从36.6% -31.0%下降,北爱尔兰从36.7% -33.2%下降,威尔士从30.8% -41.1%上升。只有在威尔士,高GWP吸入器的数量同时减少,而低GWP吸入器的数量同时增加。在研究期间,威尔士已经节省了20303吨二氧化碳当量。
{"title":"Trends in low global warming potential inhaler prescribing: A UK-wide cohort comparison from 2018-2024.","authors":"Simon M Barry, Gareth R Davies, Julian Forton, Sarah Williams, Richard Thomas, Paul Paxton, Grace Moore, Chris R Davies","doi":"10.1038/s41533-025-00415-z","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s41533-025-00415-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We performed a retrospective cohort analysis comparing trends in low global warming potential (GWP) inhaler prescribing in primary care in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland between 2018 and 2024 using national prescribing data. There was little change in England, a reduction from 36.6-31.0% in Scotland, a reduction from 36.7-33.2% in Northern Ireland, and an increase from 30.8-41.1% in Wales. Only in Wales was there a simultaneous reduction in high GWP inhalers and an increase in low GWP inhalers. Over the time period of the study there has been a saving of 20,303 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent in Wales.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":"35 1","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11842734/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143468648","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Differences in clinical characteristics between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and influenza: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)与流感临床特征的差异:系统综述和荟萃分析
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-025-00414-0
Yingying Han, Jia Guo, Xingzhao Li, Zhuan Zhong

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic has brought major challenges to the global health system, and influenza is also a problem that cannot be ignored. We aimed to explore and compare the clinical characteristics of COVID-19 and influenza to deepen the understanding of these two diseases and provide some guidance for clinicians to make differential diagnoses. We searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science for articles and performed a meta-analysis using Stata 14.0 with a random-effects model. This meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. One hundred articles involving 226,913 COVID-19 patients and 201,617 influenza patients were included, and all the articles included patients with these two diseases as experimental and control groups. Compared to influenza, COVID-19 was more common among men (OR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.23-1.74) and people with a higher body mass index (MD = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.09-1.77). The proportion of current smokers among COVID-19 patients was lower than that among influenza patients (OR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.18-0.33). Patients with COVID-19 had longer stays in the hospital (MD = 3.20, 95% CI: 2.58-3.82) and ICU (MD = 3.10, 95% CI: 1.44-4.76), required mechanical ventilation more frequently (OR = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.77-3.00), and had higher mortality (OR = 2.22, 95% CI: 1.93-2.55). We also found significant differences in some blood parameters between the two groups of patients. Upper respiratory symptoms were more obvious in influenza patients, and the proportion of comorbidities was higher than that among COVID-19 patients. There are some differences in the major characteristics, symptoms, laboratory findings and comorbidities between COVID-19 patients and influenza patients. COVID-19 patients often require more medical resources and have worse clinical outcomes.

2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫情给全球卫生系统带来了重大挑战,流感也是一个不容忽视的问题。我们旨在探讨和比较新冠肺炎与流感的临床特点,加深对这两种疾病的认识,为临床医生鉴别诊断提供一定的指导。我们检索了PubMed、Embase和Web of Science的文章,并使用Stata 14.0进行了meta分析,采用随机效应模型。本荟萃分析按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行。纳入100篇文章,涉及226,913例COVID-19患者和201,617例流感患者,所有文章均将这两种疾病的患者作为实验组和对照组。与流感相比,COVID-19在男性(OR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.23-1.74)和身体质量指数较高的人群(MD = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.09-1.77)中更为常见。COVID-19患者中吸烟者的比例低于流感患者(OR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.18-0.33)。COVID-19患者在医院(MD = 3.20, 95% CI: 2.58-3.82)和ICU (MD = 3.10, 95% CI: 1.44-4.76)的住院时间更长,需要机械通气的次数更多(OR = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.77-3.00),死亡率更高(OR = 2.22, 95% CI: 1.93-2.55)。我们还发现两组患者在一些血液参数上存在显著差异。流感患者上呼吸道症状更为明显,合并症比例高于新冠肺炎患者。COVID-19患者与流感患者在主要特征、症状、实验室检查结果和合并症方面存在一定差异。COVID-19患者往往需要更多的医疗资源,临床结果也更差。
{"title":"Differences in clinical characteristics between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and influenza: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Yingying Han, Jia Guo, Xingzhao Li, Zhuan Zhong","doi":"10.1038/s41533-025-00414-0","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s41533-025-00414-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic has brought major challenges to the global health system, and influenza is also a problem that cannot be ignored. We aimed to explore and compare the clinical characteristics of COVID-19 and influenza to deepen the understanding of these two diseases and provide some guidance for clinicians to make differential diagnoses. We searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science for articles and performed a meta-analysis using Stata 14.0 with a random-effects model. This meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. One hundred articles involving 226,913 COVID-19 patients and 201,617 influenza patients were included, and all the articles included patients with these two diseases as experimental and control groups. Compared to influenza, COVID-19 was more common among men (OR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.23-1.74) and people with a higher body mass index (MD = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.09-1.77). The proportion of current smokers among COVID-19 patients was lower than that among influenza patients (OR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.18-0.33). Patients with COVID-19 had longer stays in the hospital (MD = 3.20, 95% CI: 2.58-3.82) and ICU (MD = 3.10, 95% CI: 1.44-4.76), required mechanical ventilation more frequently (OR = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.77-3.00), and had higher mortality (OR = 2.22, 95% CI: 1.93-2.55). We also found significant differences in some blood parameters between the two groups of patients. Upper respiratory symptoms were more obvious in influenza patients, and the proportion of comorbidities was higher than that among COVID-19 patients. There are some differences in the major characteristics, symptoms, laboratory findings and comorbidities between COVID-19 patients and influenza patients. COVID-19 patients often require more medical resources and have worse clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":"35 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11775258/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143059630","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Codeveloping a community-based, peer-led psychosocial support intervention to reduce stigma and depression among people with tuberculosis and their households in Indonesia: a mixed-methods participatory action study. 共同开展以社区为基础的同伴主导的社会心理支持干预,以减少印度尼西亚结核病患者及其家庭中的耻辱感和抑郁症:一项混合方法参与性行动研究。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-024-00407-5
Ahmad Fuady, Mariska Anindhita, Matsna Hanifah, Arieska Malia Novia Putri, Artasya Karnasih, Feranindhya Agiananda, Finny Fitry Yani, Marinda Asiah Nuril Haya, Trevino Aristaskus Pakasi, Tom Wingfield

Evidence relating to peer support and community-based psychological and social (psychosocial) interventions to reduce stigma and depression among people with tuberculosis (TB) and their households is limited. This study aimed to engage with multisectoral stakeholders in Indonesia to co-develop a peer-led, community-based psychosocial intervention that is replicable, acceptable, and sustainable. We used a participatory action design and engaged key national, multisectoral stakeholders to ensure that the intervention co-design was relevant and appropriate to the TB health system and the sociocultural context of Indonesia. The co-design of the intervention evolved through four phases: (1) a scoping review to identify a long list of potential TB stigma reduction interventions; (2) a modified Delphi survey to define a shortlist of the potential interventions; (3) a national multisectoral participatory workshop to identify and pre-finalize the most viable elements of psychosocial support to distill into a single multi-faceted intervention; and (4) finalization of the intervention activities. The scoping review identified 12 potential intervention activities. These were then reduced to a shortlist of six potential intervention activities through a modified Delphi Survey completed by 22 multisectoral stakeholder representatives. At the national participatory workshop, the suitability, acceptability, and feasibility of the six potential intervention activities were discussed by the key stakeholders, and consensus reached on the final four activities to be integrated into the psychosocial support intervention. These activities consisted of: individual psychological assessment and counselling; monthly peer-led group counselling; peer-led individual support; and community-based TB Talks. In Indonesia, meaningful participation of multisectoral stakeholders facilitated co-design of a community-based, peer-led intervention to reduce TB stigma and depression amongst people with TB and their households. The intervention was considered to be locally appropriate and viable, and is being implemented and evaluated as part of the TB-CAPS intervention study.

有关同伴支持和以社区为基础的心理和社会(社会心理)干预措施以减少结核病患者及其家庭的耻辱感和抑郁症的证据有限。本研究旨在与印度尼西亚的多部门利益相关者合作,共同开发一种同行主导的、以社区为基础的、可复制、可接受和可持续的社会心理干预措施。我们采用了参与式行动设计,并让关键的国家多部门利益攸关方参与进来,以确保干预共同设计与印度尼西亚的结核病卫生系统和社会文化背景相关且适当。干预措施的共同设计经历了四个阶段:(1)范围审查,以确定一长串潜在的减少结核病耻辱感的干预措施;(2)修正德尔菲调查,确定潜在干预措施的候选名单;(3)国家多部门参与性讲习班,确定并预先确定最可行的社会心理支持要素,提炼成单一的多方面干预措施;(4)干预活动的定稿。范围审查确定了12项潜在的干预活动。然后,通过由22名多部门利益相关者代表完成的修改后的德尔菲调查,将这些活动减少到六项潜在干预活动的候选名单。在全国参与性研讨会上,主要利益相关者讨论了六项潜在干预活动的适宜性、可接受性和可行性,并就最后四项纳入社会心理支持干预的活动达成了共识。这些活动包括:个人心理评估和咨询;每月同侪小组辅导;以同伴为主导的个人支持;以及基于社区的结核病讲座。在印度尼西亚,多部门利益攸关方的有意义参与促进了以社区为基础的同伴主导的干预措施的共同设计,以减少结核病患者及其家庭对结核病的耻辱感和抑郁症。该干预措施被认为是适合当地的和可行的,并且正在作为结核病- caps干预研究的一部分实施和评估。
{"title":"Codeveloping a community-based, peer-led psychosocial support intervention to reduce stigma and depression among people with tuberculosis and their households in Indonesia: a mixed-methods participatory action study.","authors":"Ahmad Fuady, Mariska Anindhita, Matsna Hanifah, Arieska Malia Novia Putri, Artasya Karnasih, Feranindhya Agiananda, Finny Fitry Yani, Marinda Asiah Nuril Haya, Trevino Aristaskus Pakasi, Tom Wingfield","doi":"10.1038/s41533-024-00407-5","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s41533-024-00407-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evidence relating to peer support and community-based psychological and social (psychosocial) interventions to reduce stigma and depression among people with tuberculosis (TB) and their households is limited. This study aimed to engage with multisectoral stakeholders in Indonesia to co-develop a peer-led, community-based psychosocial intervention that is replicable, acceptable, and sustainable. We used a participatory action design and engaged key national, multisectoral stakeholders to ensure that the intervention co-design was relevant and appropriate to the TB health system and the sociocultural context of Indonesia. The co-design of the intervention evolved through four phases: (1) a scoping review to identify a long list of potential TB stigma reduction interventions; (2) a modified Delphi survey to define a shortlist of the potential interventions; (3) a national multisectoral participatory workshop to identify and pre-finalize the most viable elements of psychosocial support to distill into a single multi-faceted intervention; and (4) finalization of the intervention activities. The scoping review identified 12 potential intervention activities. These were then reduced to a shortlist of six potential intervention activities through a modified Delphi Survey completed by 22 multisectoral stakeholder representatives. At the national participatory workshop, the suitability, acceptability, and feasibility of the six potential intervention activities were discussed by the key stakeholders, and consensus reached on the final four activities to be integrated into the psychosocial support intervention. These activities consisted of: individual psychological assessment and counselling; monthly peer-led group counselling; peer-led individual support; and community-based TB Talks. In Indonesia, meaningful participation of multisectoral stakeholders facilitated co-design of a community-based, peer-led intervention to reduce TB stigma and depression amongst people with TB and their households. The intervention was considered to be locally appropriate and viable, and is being implemented and evaluated as part of the TB-CAPS intervention study.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":"35 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11772848/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143053077","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The availability of drugs for stable COPD treatment in China: a cross-sectional survey. 中国慢性阻塞性肺病稳定期治疗药物的供应情况:横断面调查。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Pub Date : 2025-01-25 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-025-00413-1
Dongru Du, Xueru Hu, Qiunan Zuo, Dan Xu, Tao Zhu, Tao Fan, Jiao Yang, Weiguo Xu, Hailong Wei, Kangzhuo Baima, Ying Zhang, Yanhui Gu, Lei Chen, Fengming Luo, Yongchun Shen, Fuqiang Wen

This survey aimed to investigate the availability of drugs for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatment in Chinese hospitals and to determine whether drug availability significantly varied among hospitals with different characteristics. A well-constructed questionnaire was designed according to the Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of COPD (revised version 2021). Both inhaled drugs (monotherapy, double therapy and triple therapy) and oral drugs (expectorants, theophylline, antibiotics, and bacterial lysates) were included in this survey. Doctors from different hospitals completed the survey via WeChat. The availability of each category and kind of drug was analyzed based on final valid responses. Subgroup analyses were also conducted to reveal drug availability in hospitals with different characteristics. A total of 1018 hospitals with different characteristics were enrolled in this survey, with 53.73% of which establishing independent respiratory departments. Insufficient supply of COPD-related drugs was observed, with only short-acting β2 agonists (80.6%), expectorants (88.2%) and antibiotics (84.3%) reaching 80%. Results of subgroup analyses suggested that primary hospitals were associated with poorer availability of all kinds of drugs than secondary and tertiary hospitals (all p < 0.001). Most inhaled drugs did not reach an availability of 20% in primary hospitals, except for salbutamol (59.7%), tiotropium bromide (20.0%) and beclometasone/formoterol (23.1%). Results of this survey suggested that the availability of drugs for COPD treatment in China is still an ongoing challenge for healthcare institutions. Insufficient drug supply and imbalanced drug availability among different hospitals are major barriers that warrant further improvements.

本调查旨在调查中国医院稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)治疗的药物可得性,并确定不同特点医院之间的药物可得性是否存在显著差异。根据《中国慢性阻塞性肺病诊断与管理指南(2021修订版)》设计了一份结构良好的问卷。吸入药物(单药、双药和三联药)和口服药物(祛痰药、茶碱、抗生素和细菌裂解物)均包括在本次调查中。来自不同医院的医生通过b微信完成了调查。根据最终的有效应答,分析各类别药品的可获得性。亚组分析也揭示了不同特点医院的药物可得性。共有1018家不同特点的医院参与调查,其中53.73%的医院建立了独立的呼吸科。copd相关药物供应不足,仅短效β2激动剂(80.6%)、祛痰剂(88.2%)和抗生素(84.3%)供应不足。亚组分析结果表明,基层医院各类药品的可得性较二级和三级医院差(均p
{"title":"The availability of drugs for stable COPD treatment in China: a cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Dongru Du, Xueru Hu, Qiunan Zuo, Dan Xu, Tao Zhu, Tao Fan, Jiao Yang, Weiguo Xu, Hailong Wei, Kangzhuo Baima, Ying Zhang, Yanhui Gu, Lei Chen, Fengming Luo, Yongchun Shen, Fuqiang Wen","doi":"10.1038/s41533-025-00413-1","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s41533-025-00413-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This survey aimed to investigate the availability of drugs for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatment in Chinese hospitals and to determine whether drug availability significantly varied among hospitals with different characteristics. A well-constructed questionnaire was designed according to the Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of COPD (revised version 2021). Both inhaled drugs (monotherapy, double therapy and triple therapy) and oral drugs (expectorants, theophylline, antibiotics, and bacterial lysates) were included in this survey. Doctors from different hospitals completed the survey via WeChat. The availability of each category and kind of drug was analyzed based on final valid responses. Subgroup analyses were also conducted to reveal drug availability in hospitals with different characteristics. A total of 1018 hospitals with different characteristics were enrolled in this survey, with 53.73% of which establishing independent respiratory departments. Insufficient supply of COPD-related drugs was observed, with only short-acting β2 agonists (80.6%), expectorants (88.2%) and antibiotics (84.3%) reaching 80%. Results of subgroup analyses suggested that primary hospitals were associated with poorer availability of all kinds of drugs than secondary and tertiary hospitals (all p < 0.001). Most inhaled drugs did not reach an availability of 20% in primary hospitals, except for salbutamol (59.7%), tiotropium bromide (20.0%) and beclometasone/formoterol (23.1%). Results of this survey suggested that the availability of drugs for COPD treatment in China is still an ongoing challenge for healthcare institutions. Insufficient drug supply and imbalanced drug availability among different hospitals are major barriers that warrant further improvements.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":"35 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11760382/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143040336","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
"I'm living in a 'no' world now…"- A qualitative study of the widespread impact of living with chronic breathlessness, and experiences of identification and assessment of this symptom in an older, frail community-based population. “我现在生活在一个‘不’的世界里……”——一项关于慢性呼吸困难生活的广泛影响的定性研究,以及在老年人中识别和评估这种症状的经验,虚弱的社区人口。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-024-00409-3
Helene L Elliott-Button, Miriam J Johnson, Ann Hutchinson, David C Currow, Joseph Clark

Chronic breathlessness is a debilitating symptom with detrimental impact on individuals and carers. However, little is known about the experiences of community-dwelling, frail, older adults living with chronic breathlessness. To explore, (i) the psychological impact of living with chronic breathlessness, (older frail adult patients, carers) and (ii) how patients, carers, and clinicians experience identification and assessment of chronic breathlessness in the primary care setting. In-depth semi-structured interviews with eligible older adults (≥65 years; moderate to severe frailty [electronic Frailty Index >0.36]), and carers recruited from a community-based Integrated Care Centre in England. Clinicians were recruited from the Centre and affiliated GP practices. Recorded in-person interviews were transcribed and subjected to reflexive thematic analysis using Total Dyspnoea and Breathing Space conceptual frameworks. 20 patients (9 females), carers (4 spouses, 1 daughter), and clinicians (5 GPs, 3 advanced clinical practitioners, 2 nurses) were interviewed. Four themes were identified: (1) Widespread negative impact of chronic breathlessness. Breathlessness adversely impacts physical and psychological wellbeing. (2) Barriers to optimal health-seeking and identification of chronic breathlessness. Breathlessness is 'one of many' symptoms, and not prioritised in 'one appointment, one problem' consultations. Clinicians do not routinely ask about breathlessness. Patients are unaware of breathlessness-specific therapies. (3) Variations in chronic breathlessness management. Management is limited; few are offered evidence-based treatments (e.g., handheld fan) and patients find their own strategies. (4) Need for education and information. Clinicians felt helpless about breathlessness management, and patients lacked understanding and had low expectations of receiving help for this symptom. Breathlessness adversely impacts the psychological wellbeing of older frail adults. Chronic breathlessness in older, frail adults is invisible, unidentified and unmanaged in primary care. Evidence-based breathlessness interventions are available, but not routinely implemented with few patients accessing them. Proactive identification, assessment and management of breathlessness in primary care is needed to support adults living with chronic breathlessness.

慢性呼吸困难是一种使人衰弱的症状,对个人和护理人员有不利影响。然而,人们对居住在社区、身体虚弱、患有慢性呼吸困难的老年人的经历知之甚少。探讨(i)慢性呼吸困难患者(年老体弱的成年患者、护理人员)的心理影响,以及(ii)患者、护理人员和临床医生如何在初级保健环境中识别和评估慢性呼吸困难。对符合条件的老年人(≥65岁;中度至重度虚弱[电子虚弱指数>.36]),以及从英格兰社区综合护理中心招募的护理人员。临床医生是从中心和附属全科医生诊所招募的。记录的面对面访谈被转录,并使用全呼吸困难和呼吸空间概念框架进行反身性主题分析。对20名患者(9名女性)、护理人员(4名配偶、1名女儿)和临床医生(5名全科医生、3名高级临床医生、2名护士)进行了访谈。确定了四个主题:(1)慢性呼吸困难的广泛负面影响。呼吸困难会对身体和心理健康产生不利影响。(2)慢性呼吸困难的最佳就医和识别障碍。呼吸困难是“众多”症状之一,在“一次预约,一个问题”的咨询中并不优先考虑。临床医生通常不会询问呼吸困难。患者不知道有针对呼吸困难的治疗方法。(3)慢性呼吸困难管理的差异。管理是有限的;很少有人提供循证治疗(例如,手持风扇),患者找到自己的策略。(4)教育和信息需求。临床医生对呼吸困难的管理感到无助,患者对这种症状缺乏理解,对接受帮助的期望也很低。呼吸困难对年老体弱的成年人的心理健康产生不利影响。在初级保健中,体弱多病的老年人慢性呼吸困难是看不见、无法识别和无法管理的。基于证据的呼吸困难干预措施是可用的,但没有常规实施,很少有患者使用它们。需要在初级保健中主动识别、评估和管理呼吸困难,以支持患有慢性呼吸困难的成年人。
{"title":"\"I'm living in a 'no' world now…\"- A qualitative study of the widespread impact of living with chronic breathlessness, and experiences of identification and assessment of this symptom in an older, frail community-based population.","authors":"Helene L Elliott-Button, Miriam J Johnson, Ann Hutchinson, David C Currow, Joseph Clark","doi":"10.1038/s41533-024-00409-3","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s41533-024-00409-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic breathlessness is a debilitating symptom with detrimental impact on individuals and carers. However, little is known about the experiences of community-dwelling, frail, older adults living with chronic breathlessness. To explore, (i) the psychological impact of living with chronic breathlessness, (older frail adult patients, carers) and (ii) how patients, carers, and clinicians experience identification and assessment of chronic breathlessness in the primary care setting. In-depth semi-structured interviews with eligible older adults (≥65 years; moderate to severe frailty [electronic Frailty Index >0.36]), and carers recruited from a community-based Integrated Care Centre in England. Clinicians were recruited from the Centre and affiliated GP practices. Recorded in-person interviews were transcribed and subjected to reflexive thematic analysis using Total Dyspnoea and Breathing Space conceptual frameworks. 20 patients (9 females), carers (4 spouses, 1 daughter), and clinicians (5 GPs, 3 advanced clinical practitioners, 2 nurses) were interviewed. Four themes were identified: (1) Widespread negative impact of chronic breathlessness. Breathlessness adversely impacts physical and psychological wellbeing. (2) Barriers to optimal health-seeking and identification of chronic breathlessness. Breathlessness is 'one of many' symptoms, and not prioritised in 'one appointment, one problem' consultations. Clinicians do not routinely ask about breathlessness. Patients are unaware of breathlessness-specific therapies. (3) Variations in chronic breathlessness management. Management is limited; few are offered evidence-based treatments (e.g., handheld fan) and patients find their own strategies. (4) Need for education and information. Clinicians felt helpless about breathlessness management, and patients lacked understanding and had low expectations of receiving help for this symptom. Breathlessness adversely impacts the psychological wellbeing of older frail adults. Chronic breathlessness in older, frail adults is invisible, unidentified and unmanaged in primary care. Evidence-based breathlessness interventions are available, but not routinely implemented with few patients accessing them. Proactive identification, assessment and management of breathlessness in primary care is needed to support adults living with chronic breathlessness.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":"35 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11760364/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143040113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The effect of allergic rhinitis treatment on asthma control: a systematic review. 变应性鼻炎治疗对哮喘控制的影响:系统综述。
IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-024-00408-4
Ellen Tameeris, Arthur M Bohnen, Patrick J E Bindels, Gijs Elshout

Asthma and allergic rhinitis (AR) are common disorders of the respiratory tract that often coincide. Control of AR symptoms can improve asthma outcomes in patients with co-existing diseases. Our aim is to produce a systematic review of the effectiveness of conventional anti-AR medication for asthma outcomes in patients with both diseases. The Embase, Medline and Cochrane databases were searched for publications up to October 2024. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that reported objective (OAO) or subjective asthma outcomes (SAO) and compared the efficacy of anti-AR medication to placebo or conventional asthma medication were included. Included medication interventions were antihistamines (AH), corticosteroids and leukotriene receptor antagonists (LRA). We included thirty-three RCTs. Six had an exclusively paediatric study population, 17 a partially paediatric study population. No clinically relevant improvements were seen in SAO. Quality of life (QoL) showed a significant and clinically relevant improvement in five studies. A significant and clinically relevant improvement of OAO was seen in four studies. LRAs did not show significant improvements from baseline. When compared, corticosteroids performed significantly better than LRAs. Significant improvements in both OAO and SAO were seen more often in studies with AHs than with corticosteroids. Anti-allergic initiated AHs and corticosteroids seemed to have a positive effect on asthma outcomes, with AHs having the tendency to elicit more changes in outcomes than the other studied medication groups. LRAs do not seem to influence asthma outcomes. Most significant improvements were seen in QoL and OAO. SAO did not show clinically relevant improvements.

哮喘和过敏性鼻炎(AR)是常见的呼吸道疾病,经常发生。控制AR症状可改善共存疾病患者的哮喘结局。我们的目的是对传统抗ar药物对两种疾病患者哮喘结局的有效性进行系统评价。在Embase、Medline和Cochrane数据库中检索了截至2024年10月的出版物。随机对照试验(RCTs)报告了客观(OAO)或主观哮喘结局(SAO),并将抗ar药物与安慰剂或常规哮喘药物的疗效进行了比较。药物干预包括抗组胺药(AH)、皮质类固醇和白三烯受体拮抗剂(LRA)。我们纳入了33项随机对照试验。6个研究对象是完全儿科研究人群,17个是部分儿科研究人群。SAO未见临床相关改善。在5项研究中,生活质量(QoL)显示出显著的和临床相关的改善。在四项研究中发现OAO有显著的临床相关改善。lra与基线相比没有明显改善。相比之下,皮质类固醇的表现明显好于LRAs。OAO和SAO的显著改善在AHs组的研究中比皮质类固醇组更常见。抗过敏引发的AHs和皮质类固醇似乎对哮喘结局有积极影响,与其他研究药物组相比,AHs有引起更多结果变化的趋势。lra似乎不影响哮喘结局。QoL和OAO的改善最为显著。SAO未显示出临床相关的改善。
{"title":"The effect of allergic rhinitis treatment on asthma control: a systematic review.","authors":"Ellen Tameeris, Arthur M Bohnen, Patrick J E Bindels, Gijs Elshout","doi":"10.1038/s41533-024-00408-4","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s41533-024-00408-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Asthma and allergic rhinitis (AR) are common disorders of the respiratory tract that often coincide. Control of AR symptoms can improve asthma outcomes in patients with co-existing diseases. Our aim is to produce a systematic review of the effectiveness of conventional anti-AR medication for asthma outcomes in patients with both diseases. The Embase, Medline and Cochrane databases were searched for publications up to October 2024. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that reported objective (OAO) or subjective asthma outcomes (SAO) and compared the efficacy of anti-AR medication to placebo or conventional asthma medication were included. Included medication interventions were antihistamines (AH), corticosteroids and leukotriene receptor antagonists (LRA). We included thirty-three RCTs. Six had an exclusively paediatric study population, 17 a partially paediatric study population. No clinically relevant improvements were seen in SAO. Quality of life (QoL) showed a significant and clinically relevant improvement in five studies. A significant and clinically relevant improvement of OAO was seen in four studies. LRAs did not show significant improvements from baseline. When compared, corticosteroids performed significantly better than LRAs. Significant improvements in both OAO and SAO were seen more often in studies with AHs than with corticosteroids. Anti-allergic initiated AHs and corticosteroids seemed to have a positive effect on asthma outcomes, with AHs having the tendency to elicit more changes in outcomes than the other studied medication groups. LRAs do not seem to influence asthma outcomes. Most significant improvements were seen in QoL and OAO. SAO did not show clinically relevant improvements.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":"35 1","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11748716/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143009108","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Smoking status, symptom significance and healthcare seeking with lung cancer symptoms in the Danish general population. 丹麦普通人群吸烟状况、症状意义和肺癌症状的求医
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-025-00412-2
Lisa Maria Sele Sætre, Kirubakaran Balasubramaniam, Jens Søndergaard, Dorte Ejg Jarbøl

This study analyses the associations between smoking status and perceived symptom significance (concern and influence on daily activity) among individuals with possible lung cancer symptoms and investigate the influence of symptom significance on healthcare seeking among individuals with different smoking status. A nationwide survey with 21,920 randomly selected individuals aged ≥40 years included questions about lung cancer symptoms, symptom concern and influence on daily activities, GP contact, and smoking status. Descriptive statistics and multivariable regression models were applied. Overall, individuals who currently smoked were more likely to perceive their lung cancer symptoms as significant, and individuals who reported high symptom significance were more likely to seek healthcare with both specific and non-specific symptoms. The significance of symptoms appeared to have less pronounced effect on prompting healthcare seeking among individuals with a history of current smoking. This implies that they may benefit from support and encouragement to seek care.

本研究旨在分析吸烟状况与可能有肺癌症状个体的感知症状重要性(对日常活动的关注和影响)的关系,并探讨不同吸烟状况个体的症状重要性对就医的影响。在全国范围内随机选择21,920名年龄≥40岁的个体进行调查,调查内容包括肺癌症状、症状关注及对日常活动的影响、全科医生接触和吸烟状况。采用描述性统计和多变量回归模型。总体而言,目前吸烟的个体更有可能认为他们的肺癌症状很明显,而那些报告症状高度显著的个体更有可能寻求特异性和非特异性症状的医疗保健。在有吸烟史的个体中,症状的重要性似乎对促使他们寻求医疗保健的影响不太明显。这意味着他们可能受益于支持和鼓励寻求护理。
{"title":"Smoking status, symptom significance and healthcare seeking with lung cancer symptoms in the Danish general population.","authors":"Lisa Maria Sele Sætre, Kirubakaran Balasubramaniam, Jens Søndergaard, Dorte Ejg Jarbøl","doi":"10.1038/s41533-025-00412-2","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s41533-025-00412-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study analyses the associations between smoking status and perceived symptom significance (concern and influence on daily activity) among individuals with possible lung cancer symptoms and investigate the influence of symptom significance on healthcare seeking among individuals with different smoking status. A nationwide survey with 21,920 randomly selected individuals aged ≥40 years included questions about lung cancer symptoms, symptom concern and influence on daily activities, GP contact, and smoking status. Descriptive statistics and multivariable regression models were applied. Overall, individuals who currently smoked were more likely to perceive their lung cancer symptoms as significant, and individuals who reported high symptom significance were more likely to seek healthcare with both specific and non-specific symptoms. The significance of symptoms appeared to have less pronounced effect on prompting healthcare seeking among individuals with a history of current smoking. This implies that they may benefit from support and encouragement to seek care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":"35 1","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11724040/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142965772","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Author Correction: Best practice advice for asthma exacerbation prevention and management in primary care: an international expert consensus. 作者更正:在初级保健中预防和管理哮喘加重的最佳实践建议:国际专家共识。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-024-00411-9
Neil Skolnik, Barbara P Yawn, Jaime Correia de Sousa, María Mar Martínez Vázquez, Amanda Barnard, Wendy L Wright, Austin Ulrich, Tonya Winders, Stephen Brunton
{"title":"Author Correction: Best practice advice for asthma exacerbation prevention and management in primary care: an international expert consensus.","authors":"Neil Skolnik, Barbara P Yawn, Jaime Correia de Sousa, María Mar Martínez Vázquez, Amanda Barnard, Wendy L Wright, Austin Ulrich, Tonya Winders, Stephen Brunton","doi":"10.1038/s41533-024-00411-9","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s41533-024-00411-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":"35 1","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11718181/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142952160","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1