Pub Date : 2025-05-16eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.3389/or.2025.1549416
Sneha Pallatt, Sibin Nambidi, Subhamay Adhikary, Antara Banerjee, Surajit Pathak, Asim K Duttaroy
Lynch syndrome (LS) is an autosomal dominant disorder caused by germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. These mutations result in frameshift alterations, leading to the accumulation of errors within microsatellites. Individuals with LS have an elevated risk of developing colorectal and distant malignancies, including endometrial cancer (EC), which is one of the most common cancer associated with LS. Despite its significance, the association between EC and LS is often underexplored. Given the slow progression of colorectal cancer (CRC), there is an opportunity for early detection and intervention, which can aid in reducing both incidence and mortality through the identification and management of pre-malignant lesions and early-stage tumors in colorectum/endometrium. Recognizing individuals with a heightened risk of CRC is essential for implementing personalized screening strategies. This review summarizes the original research work on LS to find out the correlation of CRC following an endometrial cancer diagnosis in individuals with MMR gene mutations, may involve refine treatment strategies and moreover this review may help clinicians and researchers to get an up-to date information on LS and its advanced treatment possibilities.
{"title":"A brief review of Lynch syndrome: understanding the dual cancer risk between endometrial and colorectal cancer.","authors":"Sneha Pallatt, Sibin Nambidi, Subhamay Adhikary, Antara Banerjee, Surajit Pathak, Asim K Duttaroy","doi":"10.3389/or.2025.1549416","DOIUrl":"10.3389/or.2025.1549416","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lynch syndrome (LS) is an autosomal dominant disorder caused by germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. These mutations result in frameshift alterations, leading to the accumulation of errors within microsatellites. Individuals with LS have an elevated risk of developing colorectal and distant malignancies, including endometrial cancer (EC), which is one of the most common cancer associated with LS. Despite its significance, the association between EC and LS is often underexplored. Given the slow progression of colorectal cancer (CRC), there is an opportunity for early detection and intervention, which can aid in reducing both incidence and mortality through the identification and management of pre-malignant lesions and early-stage tumors in colorectum/endometrium. Recognizing individuals with a heightened risk of CRC is essential for implementing personalized screening strategies. This review summarizes the original research work on LS to find out the correlation of CRC following an endometrial cancer diagnosis in individuals with MMR gene mutations, may involve refine treatment strategies and moreover this review may help clinicians and researchers to get an up-to date information on LS and its advanced treatment possibilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":19487,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Reviews","volume":"19 ","pages":"1549416"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12122774/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144199667","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-13eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.3389/or.2025.1547904
Elham Babadi, Kamran Roudini, Kianmehr Aalipour, Olatunji B Alese
Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer related deaths among patients worldwide, necessitating the development of more effective and tolerable therapies. Topoisomerase I inhibitors such as Irinotecan are integral components of chemotherapy regimens used in the management of colorectal, as well as esophageal, gastric, biliary tract, pancreatic, neuroendocrine, small bowel and anal carcinomas. Efficacy and toxicity of these regimens are however impacted by metabolism via the UGT1A1 pathways. This literature review provides a comprehensive overview of UGT1A1 polymorphism in patients with colorectal cancer, including recent developments and the future landscape. Recent literature elucidating the roles of oncogenes and predictive biomarkers on anti-cancer drugs and UGT1A1 genotypes are described. The lack of consensus in the clinical management of patients with colorectal cancer were also explored in depth. A comprehensive search was performed in multiple databases (including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Research gate, and Google Scholar) to identify relevant articles published up to January 2024. A total of 79 clinical studies were included in this review. The epidemiology and frequency of UGT1A1 genes polymorphisms by race, gender, ethnicity, geographic location and stage of the cancer were correlated with drug metabolism, toxicity, and survival outcomes. The tole of UGT1A1 as a prognostic and predictive biomarker, including existing challenges in clinical application were also discussed extensively.
结直肠癌是全世界患者癌症相关死亡的主要原因,因此有必要开发更有效和可耐受的治疗方法。拓扑异构酶I抑制剂如伊立替康是化疗方案中不可缺少的组成部分,用于治疗结直肠癌、食管癌、胃癌、胆道癌、胰腺癌、神经内分泌癌、小肠癌和肛管癌。然而,这些方案的功效和毒性受到通过UGT1A1途径代谢的影响。这篇文献综述提供了UGT1A1多态性在结直肠癌患者中的全面概述,包括最近的发展和未来的前景。最近的文献阐明了癌基因和预测生物标志物在抗癌药物和UGT1A1基因型中的作用。深入探讨了结直肠癌患者临床管理缺乏共识的问题。在多个数据库(包括PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Scopus、Research gate和谷歌Scholar)中进行全面检索,以确定截至2024年1月发表的相关文章。本综述共纳入了79项临床研究。人种、性别、民族、地理位置和癌症分期的UGT1A1基因多态性的流行病学和频率与药物代谢、毒性和生存结果相关。我们还对UGT1A1作为一种预后和预测性生物标志物的作用以及临床应用中存在的挑战进行了广泛的讨论。
{"title":"The role of UGT1A1 polymorphism in the management of colorectal cancer.","authors":"Elham Babadi, Kamran Roudini, Kianmehr Aalipour, Olatunji B Alese","doi":"10.3389/or.2025.1547904","DOIUrl":"10.3389/or.2025.1547904","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer related deaths among patients worldwide, necessitating the development of more effective and tolerable therapies. Topoisomerase I inhibitors such as Irinotecan are integral components of chemotherapy regimens used in the management of colorectal, as well as esophageal, gastric, biliary tract, pancreatic, neuroendocrine, small bowel and anal carcinomas. Efficacy and toxicity of these regimens are however impacted by metabolism via the UGT1A1 pathways. This literature review provides a comprehensive overview of UGT1A1 polymorphism in patients with colorectal cancer, including recent developments and the future landscape. Recent literature elucidating the roles of oncogenes and predictive biomarkers on anti-cancer drugs and UGT1A1 genotypes are described. The lack of consensus in the clinical management of patients with colorectal cancer were also explored in depth. A comprehensive search was performed in multiple databases (including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Research gate, and Google Scholar) to identify relevant articles published up to January 2024. A total of 79 clinical studies were included in this review. The epidemiology and frequency of UGT1A1 genes polymorphisms by race, gender, ethnicity, geographic location and stage of the cancer were correlated with drug metabolism, toxicity, and survival outcomes. The tole of UGT1A1 as a prognostic and predictive biomarker, including existing challenges in clinical application were also discussed extensively.</p>","PeriodicalId":19487,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Reviews","volume":"19 ","pages":"1547904"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12106485/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144160721","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-06eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.3389/or.2025.1567860
Mowei Kong, Yang Yu, Shuai Shao, Chunxiang Zhang
Mitochondrial "powerhouses" play a central function in cellular metabolism and energy generation. Their dysregulation is directly correlated with a myriad of diseases, among them cancer. The serine protease ClpP, accompanied by its cochaperone ClpX, is a principal homeostatic regulator in mitochondrial function by degrading aberrant proteins in order to preserve mitochondrial integrity. Recently, evidence suggests ClpP is overexpressed in many cancer cells and, as such, is an appealing target for drug therapy. In this review, current information about the structure, physiological function, and therapeutic promise of mitochondrial ClpP in oncology is summarized. We provide an overview about the mechanistic rationale behind ClpP agonists as novel anticancer drugs, their regulation in cell signal transduction, and the major challenge in the creation of small molecules that specifically activate human ClpP, but not bacterial ClpP. The review highlights the therapeutic promise of ClpP agonists as a novel approach in cancer therapy, presenting their prospective potential for cancer treatment by focusing on an unexplored mitochondrial target.
{"title":"Targeting mitochondrial ClpP: structural insights and therapeutic potential of ClpP agonists in cancer therapy.","authors":"Mowei Kong, Yang Yu, Shuai Shao, Chunxiang Zhang","doi":"10.3389/or.2025.1567860","DOIUrl":"10.3389/or.2025.1567860","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mitochondrial \"powerhouses\" play a central function in cellular metabolism and energy generation. Their dysregulation is directly correlated with a myriad of diseases, among them cancer. The serine protease ClpP, accompanied by its cochaperone ClpX, is a principal homeostatic regulator in mitochondrial function by degrading aberrant proteins in order to preserve mitochondrial integrity. Recently, evidence suggests ClpP is overexpressed in many cancer cells and, as such, is an appealing target for drug therapy. In this review, current information about the structure, physiological function, and therapeutic promise of mitochondrial ClpP in oncology is summarized. We provide an overview about the mechanistic rationale behind ClpP agonists as novel anticancer drugs, their regulation in cell signal transduction, and the major challenge in the creation of small molecules that specifically activate human ClpP, but not bacterial ClpP. The review highlights the therapeutic promise of ClpP agonists as a novel approach in cancer therapy, presenting their prospective potential for cancer treatment by focusing on an unexplored mitochondrial target.</p>","PeriodicalId":19487,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Reviews","volume":"19 ","pages":"1567860"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12089087/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144111491","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-01eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.3389/or.2025.1567818
Wenshu Wang, Runyuan Zhao, Xi Liang, Manjun Liu, Haiyan Bai, Jianli Ge, Binxi Yao, Zheng Zhi, Jianming He
Background: An updated meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients treated with total mesorectal excision (TME) or other types of surgery (non-TME-only).
Methods: The PubMed, Cochrane Library, and CNKI databases were searched. Data on overall survival (OS) were extracted.
Results: Hazard ratios (HRs) for OS associated with preoperative radiotherapy, preoperative long-course concurrent chemoradiotherapy (LCCRT), preoperative radiotherapy alone, and postoperative radiotherapy in patients treated with TME were 1.02 [95% CI: 0.92-1.14, P = 0.65], 1.04 [95% CI: 0.93-1.16, P = 0.47], 0.87 [95% CI: 0.61-1.25, P = 0.46], and 1.18 [95% CI: 0.91-1.52, P = 0.20], respectively. HRs for OS associated with preoperative radiotherapy, preoperative LCCRT, preoperative radiotherapy alone, preoperative long-course RT (LCRT), and preoperative short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) in patients treated with non-TME-only surgery were 0.85 [95% CI: 0.79-0.90, P < 0.00001], 0.77 [95% CI: 0.63-0.94, P = 0.009], 0.86 [95% CI: 0.80-0.92, P < 0.0001], 0.83 [95% CI: 0.73-0.95, P = 0.005], and 0.84 [95% CI: 0.77-0.91, P= <0.0001], respectively. The HR for postoperative radiotherapy in patients treated with non-TME-only surgery was 1.08 [95% CI: 0.84-1.39, P = 0.57].
Conclusion: Preoperative radiotherapy, regardless of the regimen, improves the OS in patients treated with non-TME-only surgery, but not in those treated with TME. Postoperative radiotherapy does not improve OS.
Advances in knowledge: This meta-analysis will serve as a reference for decision-making in multidisciplinary approaches for rectal cancer patients.
背景:进行了一项最新的荟萃分析,以评估放疗对直肠癌患者全肠系膜切除术(TME)或其他类型手术(非TME)的疗效。方法:检索PubMed、Cochrane Library、CNKI数据库。提取总生存期(OS)数据。结果:TME患者术前放疗、术前长疗程同步放化疗(LCCRT)、术前单独放疗和术后放疗相关OS的风险比(hr)分别为1.02 [95% CI: 0.92-1.14, P = 0.65]、1.04 [95% CI: 0.93-1.16, P = 0.47]、0.87 [95% CI: 0.61-1.25, P = 0.46]和1.18 [95% CI: 0.91-1.52, P = 0.20]。非tme手术患者术前放疗、术前LCCRT、术前单独放疗、术前长程放疗(LCRT)和术前短程放疗(SCRT)相关OS的hr分别为0.85 [95% CI: 0.79-0.90, P < 0.00001]、0.77 [95% CI: 0.63-0.94, P= 0.009]、0.86 [95% CI: 0.80-0.92, P < 0.0001]、0.83 [95% CI: 0.73-0.95, P= 0.005]和0.84 [95% CI: 0.77-0.91, P=结论:术前放疗,无论何种治疗方案,均可改善非单纯TME手术患者的OS,而非单纯TME患者的OS。术后放疗不能改善OS。知识进展:本荟萃分析将为直肠癌患者多学科治疗决策提供参考。
{"title":"Efficacies of radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients treated with total mesorectal excision or other types of surgery: an updated meta-analysis.","authors":"Wenshu Wang, Runyuan Zhao, Xi Liang, Manjun Liu, Haiyan Bai, Jianli Ge, Binxi Yao, Zheng Zhi, Jianming He","doi":"10.3389/or.2025.1567818","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3389/or.2025.1567818","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An updated meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients treated with total mesorectal excision (TME) or other types of surgery (non-TME-only).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PubMed, Cochrane Library, and CNKI databases were searched. Data on overall survival (OS) were extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hazard ratios (HRs) for OS associated with preoperative radiotherapy, preoperative long-course concurrent chemoradiotherapy (LCCRT), preoperative radiotherapy alone, and postoperative radiotherapy in patients treated with TME were 1.02 [95% CI: 0.92-1.14, P = 0.65], 1.04 [95% CI: 0.93-1.16, P = 0.47], 0.87 [95% CI: 0.61-1.25, P = 0.46], and 1.18 [95% CI: 0.91-1.52, P = 0.20], respectively. HRs for OS associated with preoperative radiotherapy, preoperative LCCRT, preoperative radiotherapy alone, preoperative long-course RT (LCRT), and preoperative short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) in patients treated with non-TME-only surgery were 0.85 [95% CI: 0.79-0.90, P < 0.00001], 0.77 [95% CI: 0.63-0.94, P = 0.009], 0.86 [95% CI: 0.80-0.92, P < 0.0001], 0.83 [95% CI: 0.73-0.95, P = 0.005], and 0.84 [95% CI: 0.77-0.91, P= <0.0001], respectively. The HR for postoperative radiotherapy in patients treated with non-TME-only surgery was 1.08 [95% CI: 0.84-1.39, P = 0.57].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preoperative radiotherapy, regardless of the regimen, improves the OS in patients treated with non-TME-only surgery, but not in those treated with TME. Postoperative radiotherapy does not improve OS.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>This meta-analysis will serve as a reference for decision-making in multidisciplinary approaches for rectal cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19487,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Reviews","volume":"19 ","pages":"1567818"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12078337/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144078691","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-30eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.3389/or.2025.1527742
Saskia Hazout, Christoph Oehler, Daniel R Zwahlen, Daniel Taussky
Introduction: Since Röntgen's discovery of X-rays in 1895, advancements in radiobiology have significantly shaped radiotherapy practices. This historical review traces the evolution of radiobiological theories and their impacts on current therapeutic strategies.
Materials and methods: Databases such as PubMed were utilized to trace the evolution of concepts in radiobiology.
Results/discussion: One of the first theories concerning the effect of radiation was Dessauer's target theory, introduced in the 1920s. He found that damage to critical molecular cellular targets leads to cell death. In the early 20th century, Muller contributed to the understanding of DNA structure and radiation-induced mutations, highlighting theories on the impact of radiation on genetic material and cellular damage. In 1972, Kellerer and Rossi introduced the theory of dual radiation action, which explains that ionizing radiation induces sequential damage to DNA, starting with single-strand breaks and progressing to irreparable double-strand breaks. Recent advances have enhanced the understanding of the effects of radiation on the microenvironment and immune responses, thereby improving therapeutic outcomes. The significance of the sigmoid dose-response curve and the initial shoulder effect were recognized early, leading to theoretical models such as the multitarget single-hit, linear-quadratic and repair-misrepair models. The history of fractionation and the 4R/5R principles have informed today's ultrahigh fractionation techniques, including single doses of approximately 20 Gy.
Conclusion: Although significant advances have been made toward understanding the effects of radiation on cancerous and healthy tissues, many clinical observations, such as the effects of very high doses or FLASH therapy, remain poorly understood.
{"title":"Historical view of the effects of radiation on cancer cells.","authors":"Saskia Hazout, Christoph Oehler, Daniel R Zwahlen, Daniel Taussky","doi":"10.3389/or.2025.1527742","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3389/or.2025.1527742","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Since Röntgen's discovery of X-rays in 1895, advancements in radiobiology have significantly shaped radiotherapy practices. This historical review traces the evolution of radiobiological theories and their impacts on current therapeutic strategies.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Databases such as PubMed were utilized to trace the evolution of concepts in radiobiology.</p><p><strong>Results/discussion: </strong>One of the first theories concerning the effect of radiation was Dessauer's target theory, introduced in the 1920s. He found that damage to critical molecular cellular targets leads to cell death. In the early 20th century, Muller contributed to the understanding of DNA structure and radiation-induced mutations, highlighting theories on the impact of radiation on genetic material and cellular damage. In 1972, Kellerer and Rossi introduced the theory of dual radiation action, which explains that ionizing radiation induces sequential damage to DNA, starting with single-strand breaks and progressing to irreparable double-strand breaks. Recent advances have enhanced the understanding of the effects of radiation on the microenvironment and immune responses, thereby improving therapeutic outcomes. The significance of the sigmoid dose-response curve and the initial shoulder effect were recognized early, leading to theoretical models such as the multitarget single-hit, linear-quadratic and repair-misrepair models. The history of fractionation and the 4R/5R principles have informed today's ultrahigh fractionation techniques, including single doses of approximately 20 Gy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although significant advances have been made toward understanding the effects of radiation on cancerous and healthy tissues, many clinical observations, such as the effects of very high doses or FLASH therapy, remain poorly understood.</p>","PeriodicalId":19487,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Reviews","volume":"19 ","pages":"1527742"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12075557/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144078709","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-30eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.3389/or.2025.1573797
Kaio Cezar Rodrigues Salum, Gabriel Brendo Alves Miranda, Alessandra Lima Dias, João Regis Ivar Carneiro, Patrícia Torres Bozza, Ana Carolina Proença da Fonseca, Tamara Silva
The Endocannabinoid System (ECS) plays a critical role in maintaining physiological homeostasis, influencing a range of processes such as neuroprotection, inflammation, energy metabolism, and immune responses. Comprising cannabinoid receptors (CB1 and CB2), endogenous ligands (endocannabinoids), and the enzymes responsible for their synthesis and degradation, the ECS has attracted increasing attention in cancer research. Cannabinoid receptor activation has been associated with the regulation of cancer-related processes, including cell proliferation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis, suggesting that the ECS may have a role in tumor progression and cancer treatment. Preclinical studies have shown that cannabinoids, through their interaction with CB1 and CB2 receptors, can inhibit tumor cell growth, induce programmed cell death, and suppress the formation of new blood vessels in various cancer models. Despite these encouraging findings, the clinical translation of ECS-targeted therapies remains in its early stages. The complexity of tumor heterogeneity, the variability in patient responses, and the challenges associated with the pharmacokinetics of cannabinoids are significant obstacles to the broader application of these findings in clinical settings. This review provides an overview of the current understanding of the ECS's involvement in cancer biology, focusing on key mechanisms by which it may influence carcinogenesis. Additionally, we discuss the therapeutic potential of targeting the ECS in cancer treatment, while highlighting the limitations and uncertainties that need to be addressed through ongoing research.
{"title":"The endocannabinoid system in cancer biology: a mini-review of mechanisms and therapeutic potential.","authors":"Kaio Cezar Rodrigues Salum, Gabriel Brendo Alves Miranda, Alessandra Lima Dias, João Regis Ivar Carneiro, Patrícia Torres Bozza, Ana Carolina Proença da Fonseca, Tamara Silva","doi":"10.3389/or.2025.1573797","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3389/or.2025.1573797","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Endocannabinoid System (ECS) plays a critical role in maintaining physiological homeostasis, influencing a range of processes such as neuroprotection, inflammation, energy metabolism, and immune responses. Comprising cannabinoid receptors (CB1 and CB2), endogenous ligands (endocannabinoids), and the enzymes responsible for their synthesis and degradation, the ECS has attracted increasing attention in cancer research. Cannabinoid receptor activation has been associated with the regulation of cancer-related processes, including cell proliferation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis, suggesting that the ECS may have a role in tumor progression and cancer treatment. Preclinical studies have shown that cannabinoids, through their interaction with CB1 and CB2 receptors, can inhibit tumor cell growth, induce programmed cell death, and suppress the formation of new blood vessels in various cancer models. Despite these encouraging findings, the clinical translation of ECS-targeted therapies remains in its early stages. The complexity of tumor heterogeneity, the variability in patient responses, and the challenges associated with the pharmacokinetics of cannabinoids are significant obstacles to the broader application of these findings in clinical settings. This review provides an overview of the current understanding of the ECS's involvement in cancer biology, focusing on key mechanisms by which it may influence carcinogenesis. Additionally, we discuss the therapeutic potential of targeting the ECS in cancer treatment, while highlighting the limitations and uncertainties that need to be addressed through ongoing research.</p>","PeriodicalId":19487,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Reviews","volume":"19 ","pages":"1573797"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12075236/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144078815","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The high incidence and mortality rates associated with gastrointestinal cancers represent a significant global health challenge. In recent years, CAR T cell therapy has emerged as a promising immunotherapeutic approach, demonstrating favorable clinical outcomes. However, the application of traditional CAR T cell therapy in gastrointestinal cancers faces numerous challenges, including the suppressive tumor microenvironment and limitations in anti-tumor efficacy. The application of engineered bacteria offers a novel strategy to enhance CAR T cell therapy by modulating the tumor microenvironment and boosting immune responses, potentially leading to improved therapeutic outcomes. This review synthesizes the current research advancements related to engineered bacteria-assisted CAR T cell therapy in gastrointestinal cancers, exploring its underlying mechanisms, clinical applications, and future developmental directions.
{"title":"Prospects of engineered bacteria-assisted CAR T Cell therapy in gastrointestinal cancers.","authors":"Qingqing Zhang, Xiao Song, Junhong Liu, Xuejiao Zhou","doi":"10.3389/or.2025.1581856","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3389/or.2025.1581856","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The high incidence and mortality rates associated with gastrointestinal cancers represent a significant global health challenge. In recent years, CAR T cell therapy has emerged as a promising immunotherapeutic approach, demonstrating favorable clinical outcomes. However, the application of traditional CAR T cell therapy in gastrointestinal cancers faces numerous challenges, including the suppressive tumor microenvironment and limitations in anti-tumor efficacy. The application of engineered bacteria offers a novel strategy to enhance CAR T cell therapy by modulating the tumor microenvironment and boosting immune responses, potentially leading to improved therapeutic outcomes. This review synthesizes the current research advancements related to engineered bacteria-assisted CAR T cell therapy in gastrointestinal cancers, exploring its underlying mechanisms, clinical applications, and future developmental directions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19487,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Reviews","volume":"19 ","pages":"1581856"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12034723/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144035551","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-10eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.3389/or.2025.1564642
Nayoung Kim, Kiven Erique Lukong
Breast cancer is one of the most significant causes of mortality among women and the second most prevalent cancer worldwide. Estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancers are the most common molecular subtype of breast cancer, comprising about 70% of breast carcinoma diagnoses worldwide. Endocrine therapy is the foremost strategy for the treatment of ER-positive breast cancer. In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved endocrine therapies for ER-positive breast cancers that include selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), selective estrogen receptor downregulators/degraders (SERDs) and aromatase inhibitors (AIs). The approved SERMS, tamoxifen, toremifene and raloxifene, are the gold-standard treatments. The only FDA-approved SERD available for treating ER and hormone-positive breast cancers is fulvestrant, and various generations of AIs, including exemestane, letrozole, and anastrozole, have also received FDA approval. Herein, we review the major FDA-approved SERMs and SERDs for treating ER-positive breast cancer, focusing on their mechanisms of action. We also explore molecular events that contribute to the resistance of these drugs to endocrine therapies and combinational strategies with drugs such as cyclin-dependant kinases 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors in clinical trials to combat endocrine drug resistance.
{"title":"Treating ER-positive breast cancer: a review of the current FDA-approved SERMs and SERDs and their mechanisms of action.","authors":"Nayoung Kim, Kiven Erique Lukong","doi":"10.3389/or.2025.1564642","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3389/or.2025.1564642","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Breast cancer is one of the most significant causes of mortality among women and the second most prevalent cancer worldwide. Estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancers are the most common molecular subtype of breast cancer, comprising about 70% of breast carcinoma diagnoses worldwide. Endocrine therapy is the foremost strategy for the treatment of ER-positive breast cancer. In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved endocrine therapies for ER-positive breast cancers that include selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), selective estrogen receptor downregulators/degraders (SERDs) and aromatase inhibitors (AIs). The approved SERMS, tamoxifen, toremifene and raloxifene, are the gold-standard treatments. The only FDA-approved SERD available for treating ER and hormone-positive breast cancers is fulvestrant, and various generations of AIs, including exemestane, letrozole, and anastrozole, have also received FDA approval. Herein, we review the major FDA-approved SERMs and SERDs for treating ER-positive breast cancer, focusing on their mechanisms of action. We also explore molecular events that contribute to the resistance of these drugs to endocrine therapies and combinational strategies with drugs such as cyclin-dependant kinases 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors in clinical trials to combat endocrine drug resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":19487,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Reviews","volume":"19 ","pages":"1564642"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12018393/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144003443","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-14eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.3389/or.2025.1541326
Parminder Singh, Mahalaqua Nazli Khatib, Roopashree R, Mandeep Kaur, Manish Srivastava, Amit Barwal, G V Siva Rajput, Pranchal Rajput, Rukshar Syed, Gajendra Sharma, Sunil Kumar, Muhammed Shabil, Sakshi Pandey, Manvinder Brar, Ganesh Bushi, Rachana Mehta, Sanjit Sah, Khang Wen Goh, Prakasini Satapathy, Abhay M Gaidhane, Shailesh Kumar Samal
Advancements in personalized neoantigen-based cancer vaccines are ushering in a new era in oncology, targeting unique genetic alterations within tumors to enhance treatment precision and efficacy. Neoantigens, specific to cancer cells and absent in normal tissues, are at the heart of these vaccines, promising to direct the immune system specifically against the tumor, thereby maximizing therapeutic efficacy while minimizing side effects. The identification of neoantigens through genomic and proteomic technologies is central to developing these vaccines, allowing for the precise mapping of a tumor's mutational landscape. Despite advancements, accurately predicting which neoantigens will elicit strong immune responses remains challenging due to tumor variability and the complexity of immune system interactions. This necessitates further refinement of bioinformatics tools and predictive models. Moreover, the efficacy of these vaccines heavily depends on innovative delivery methods that enhance neoantigen presentation to the immune system. Techniques like encapsulating neoantigens in lipid nanoparticles and using viral vectors are critical for improving vaccine stability and delivery. Additionally, these vaccines contribute towards achieving Sustainable Development Goal 3.8, promoting universal health coverage by advancing access to safe and effective cancer treatments. This review delves into the potential of neoantigen-based vaccines to transform cancer treatment, examining both revolutionary advancements and the ongoing challenges they face.
{"title":"Advancements and challenges in personalized neoantigen-based cancer vaccines.","authors":"Parminder Singh, Mahalaqua Nazli Khatib, Roopashree R, Mandeep Kaur, Manish Srivastava, Amit Barwal, G V Siva Rajput, Pranchal Rajput, Rukshar Syed, Gajendra Sharma, Sunil Kumar, Muhammed Shabil, Sakshi Pandey, Manvinder Brar, Ganesh Bushi, Rachana Mehta, Sanjit Sah, Khang Wen Goh, Prakasini Satapathy, Abhay M Gaidhane, Shailesh Kumar Samal","doi":"10.3389/or.2025.1541326","DOIUrl":"10.3389/or.2025.1541326","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advancements in personalized neoantigen-based cancer vaccines are ushering in a new era in oncology, targeting unique genetic alterations within tumors to enhance treatment precision and efficacy. Neoantigens, specific to cancer cells and absent in normal tissues, are at the heart of these vaccines, promising to direct the immune system specifically against the tumor, thereby maximizing therapeutic efficacy while minimizing side effects. The identification of neoantigens through genomic and proteomic technologies is central to developing these vaccines, allowing for the precise mapping of a tumor's mutational landscape. Despite advancements, accurately predicting which neoantigens will elicit strong immune responses remains challenging due to tumor variability and the complexity of immune system interactions. This necessitates further refinement of bioinformatics tools and predictive models. Moreover, the efficacy of these vaccines heavily depends on innovative delivery methods that enhance neoantigen presentation to the immune system. Techniques like encapsulating neoantigens in lipid nanoparticles and using viral vectors are critical for improving vaccine stability and delivery. Additionally, these vaccines contribute towards achieving Sustainable Development Goal 3.8, promoting universal health coverage by advancing access to safe and effective cancer treatments. This review delves into the potential of neoantigen-based vaccines to transform cancer treatment, examining both revolutionary advancements and the ongoing challenges they face.</p>","PeriodicalId":19487,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Reviews","volume":"19 ","pages":"1541326"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11949952/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143753667","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-05eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.3389/or.2025.1446850
Mariana Rei, João Francisco Bernardes, Antónia Costa
Preoperative staging in endometrial cancer has recently been implied as an important factor in accurately selecting low-risk cases, ultimately avoiding unnecessary lymph node debulking. Transvaginal ultrasound seems promising in clinical staging as it offers the possibility to assess the depth of myometrial infiltration and cervical stromal invasion. This commonly available, non-invasive, and low-cost modality serves as an accurate alternative to MRI, especially in middle- and low-income countries, where MRI may not be promptly available and cost is an important issue. This review aims to summarize the progressive role of clinical implementation of pelvic ultrasonography in the locoregional staging of endometrial carcinoma and to compare its accuracy with other preoperative methods.
{"title":"Ultrasound in endometrial cancer: evaluating the impact of pre-surgical staging.","authors":"Mariana Rei, João Francisco Bernardes, Antónia Costa","doi":"10.3389/or.2025.1446850","DOIUrl":"10.3389/or.2025.1446850","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Preoperative staging in endometrial cancer has recently been implied as an important factor in accurately selecting low-risk cases, ultimately avoiding unnecessary lymph node debulking. Transvaginal ultrasound seems promising in clinical staging as it offers the possibility to assess the depth of myometrial infiltration and cervical stromal invasion. This commonly available, non-invasive, and low-cost modality serves as an accurate alternative to MRI, especially in middle- and low-income countries, where MRI may not be promptly available and cost is an important issue. This review aims to summarize the progressive role of clinical implementation of pelvic ultrasonography in the locoregional staging of endometrial carcinoma and to compare its accuracy with other preoperative methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":19487,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Reviews","volume":"19 ","pages":"1446850"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11920118/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143664055","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}