Oncology最新文献

Introduction: For predicting esophagogastric varices (EGVs), the Virtual Baveno VII Consensus Workshop has proposed a combination of liver stiffness determination and platelet count measurement using a FibroScan®. However, FibroScan® is not available at all institutions. The present study aimed to develop a simple method to predict development of EGV using only general blood examination results.

Materials and methods: A total of 1,090 hepatocellular carcinoma patients were enrolled, after excluding 956 with major portal vein tumor thrombus (Vp3/Vp4) or without upper gastrointestinal endoscopy examination results available. Those with EGV (≥ grade F2) or a history of treatment for the condition were defined as positive for significant EGV, and then clinical factors were retrospectively evaluated to determine indicators of occurrence.

Results: Logistic multivariate analysis showed platelet count (≤12 × 104/μL) (odds ratio [OR] 3.79, p < 0.001), mALBI grade 2a (OR 1.52, p = 0.036), and mALBI 2b or 3 (OR 3.46, p < 0.001) as significant predictive factors. Based on the OR values, platelet count (≤12 × 104/μL) and mALBI grade 2b/3 were each assigned 2 points and mALBI 2a was given 1 point, with the result termed recommendation for EGV screening (REGS) score. Significant EGV occurrence was noted in 2.9% (9/311) of the patients with a REGS score 0, 11.0% (13/118) with a score 1, 19.3% (53/274) with a score 2, 29.5% (39/132) with a score 3, and 38.0% (97/255) with a score 4 (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The findings indicate that REGS score can provide useful predictive information for development of significant EGV without the need for special equipment such as a FibroScan®.

Introduction: Tumor burden is a frequently mentioned parameter; however, a commonly accepted definition is still lacking.

Methods: In this double-center prospective and retrospective study, 76 patients with unresectable stage III or stage IV melanoma treated with ipilimumab were included. We defined the baseline tumor burden (BTB) as the global sum of all metastases' longest diameters before treatment started and correlated the calculated BTB with disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and with the baseline levels of LDH, S100B, and sULPB2.

Results: BTB correlated significantly with DCR (p = 0.009), PFS (p = 0.002), OS (p = 0.032), and the occurrence of NRAS mutation (p = 0.006). BTB was also correlated to baseline serum levels of LDH (p = 0.011), S100B (p = 0.027), and SULBP (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that BPB and LDH were independently correlated with PFS and OS. With increasing BTB, disease control was less likely; no patient with a BTB >200 mm achieved disease control. For patients with brain metastasis, no correlation of BTB with DCR (p = 0.251), PFS (p = 0.059), or OS (p = 0.981) was observed.

Conclusion: Calculated BTB is an independent prognostic factor for patients with metastatic melanoma treated with ipilimumab. Using calculated BTB as a definition of tumor burden may help increase comparability of outcome of therapies in future studies.

Introduction: Advancements in the field of oncology are allowing patients to live longer, with enhanced quality of life (QoL). Accordingly, more patients with cancer are expressing the desire to return to work (RTW). Previous research has indicated that patients with a rare or advanced cancer can experience unique problems in the RTW process.

Methods: This pilot study evaluated the outcomes and feasibility of the occupational care programme TERRA (i.e., recalibraTe lifE and woRk with and afteR cAncer) for patients with a rare or advanced cancer. Four rare cancer patients and 3 advanced cancer patients completed TERRA; a supportive occupational care programme consisting of five online group sessions over a two-month period. Pre- and post-intervention outcomes were collected using validated self-report questionnaires. The primary outcome was work ability. Secondary outcomes included QoL, anxiety and depression, fatigue, unmet needs, self-efficacy, readiness for RTW, work intention, work involvement, and work-life conflict. Feasibility was assessed using the RE-AIM model.

Results: Changes in work ability scores were inconsistent across participants. Well-being outcomes generally improved following the intervention. Feasibility was evaluated positively by both participants and trainers.

Conclusion: A multidisciplinary approach may further improve outcomes of occupational interventions supporting rare and advanced cancer patients. An effectiveness study to evaluate the outcomes and feasibility of the programme is deemed necessary.

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of stage I breast cancer (BC) patients diagnosed during the current era of screening mammography, immunohistochemistry receptor testing, and systemic adjuvant therapy.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 328 stage I BC patients treated consecutively in a single referral center with a follow-up period of at least 12 years. The primary endpoints were invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and overall survival (OS). The influence of tumor size, grade, and subtype on the outcomes was analyzed.

Results: Most patients were treated by lumpectomy, sentinel node biopsy, and adjuvant endocrine therapy, and most (82%) were of subtype luminal A. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 25.6% of our cohort. Only 24 patients underwent gene expression testing, which was introduced toward the end of the study period. Mean IDFS was 14.64 years, with a 15-year IDFS of 75.6%. Mean OS was 15.28 years with a 15-year OS of 74.9%. In a Cox multivariate analysis, no clinical or pathologic variable impacted on OS and only tumor size (<1 cm vs. 1-2 cm) impacted significantly on IDFS. During follow-up, 20.1% of the cohort developed second primary cancers, including BC. The median time to diagnosis of a second BC was 6.49 years.

Conclusion: The study results emphasize the importance of long-term follow-up and screening for subsequent malignancies of patients with stage I BC and support the need for using prognostic and predictive indicators beyond the routine clinicopathological characteristics in luminal A patients.

Introduction: It is well known that patients with objective response to pembrolizumab have a durable duration of response, leading to favorable survival outcomes. We investigated the possibility of predicting the objective response with concise indicators obtained from daily clinical practice.

Methods: In our multi-institutional cohort, 220 platinum-refractory metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) patients treated with pembrolizumab for at least 6 weeks with complete information of objective response were investigated.

Results: The median follow-up was 7.3 months, and 119 patients deceased during the follow-up. A multivariate logistic regression analysis exhibited two independent variables predicting the objective response, including the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) change at 6 weeks of treatment and liver metastasis. We proposed a risk group using these two indicators. Patients with no predictive indicators/one of those were assigned to favorable (42%)/intermittent (47%) risk groups. Patients with both indicators were assigned to poor risk (11%). Notably, the objective response rate was well delineated in 41%, 25%, and 0% for favorable-, intermediate-, and poor-risk groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Distinct overall survival (OS) between the risk groups was also confirmed with the median OS of 14.1, 11.7, and 4.2 months in favorable-, intermediate-, and poor-risk groups, respectively.

Conclusions: At the 6 weeks of the pembrolizumab treatment, our risk model predicts the objective response rate precisely. Notably, those classified as "poor risk" - marked by liver metastasis and an increased NLR - should be considered for alternative therapy with a different mode of action, highlighting a critical decision point in treatment optimization.

Introduction: The study explored the effects of SHOX2 and RASSF1A DNA methylation in lung cancer (LC).

Method: Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples as well as LC and normal adjacent tissues were collected from 72 LC patients and 35 patients with benign pulmonary nodules. Quantitative analysis of SHOX2 and RASSF1A DNA methylation was performed in benign pulmonary nodules and different stages of LC. The diagnostic value of SHOX2 and RASSF1A DNA methylation in LC and benign pulmonary nodules was determined by receiver operating characteristics analysis. Gain/loss-of-function experiments were constructed in LC cells and mouse models of xenograft and pulmonary nodule metastasis. The levels of SHOX2 and transfer-associated genes were tested through quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and Western blot. Malignant phenotype of LC cells was assessed by functional experiment. The tumor volume and weight of mice in xenograft models were measured. Pulmonary nodule metastasis was determined through HE staining assay. 5-azacytidine appeared as a positive control drug.

Result: SHOX2 DNA methylation or RASSF1A DNA methylation had diagnostic efficiency in pulmonary nodules and early LC, with the two combined having better diagnostic value. SHOX2 expression was upregulated in LC. Similar to 5-azacytidine, SHOX2 knockdown inhibited LC cell viability, migration, and invasion in vitro as well as restrained LC tumorigenesis and pulmonary nodule metastasis in vivo, whereas overexpressed SHOX2 had the opposite effects.

Conclusion: The combination of SHOX2 and RASSF1A DNA methylation had a diagnostic value in pulmonary nodules and early LC. SHOX2 positively modulated the tumorigenesis and metastasis of LC by regulating DNA methylation processes.

Introduction: The relative efficacies of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for the treatment of recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after surgery remain unclear.

Methods: Among 801 patients with NSCLC who underwent pulmonary resection at Kanazawa Medical University between 2017 and 2021, sixty-four patients had recurrence. We retrospectively compared the efficacies of EGFR-TKIs and ICIs in these patients with recurrent NSCLC who underwent pulmonary resection.

Results: The 3-year overall survival rates after recurrence were 79.3% in patients who received EGFR-TKIs, 69.5% in patients who received ICIs, and 43.7% in patients who received cytotoxic agents. There was no significant difference in overall survival between patients treated with EGFR-TKIs and ICIs (p = 0.14) or between patients treated with ICIs and cytotoxic agents (p = 0.23), but overall survival was significantly higher in patients treated with EGFR-TKIs compared with cytotoxic agents (p < 0.01). The probabilities of a 2-year response were 88.5%, 61.6%, and 25.9% in patients treated with EGFR-TKIs, ICIs, and cytotoxic agents, respectively. There was no significant difference in response periods between patients treated with EGFR-TKIs and ICIs (p = 0.18), but the response period was significantly better in patients treated with EGFR-TKIs (p < 0.01) or ICIs (p = 0.03) compared with cytotoxic agents. Percent-predicted vital capacity (p = 0.03) and epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutation (p < 0.01) were significant factors affecting the overall response to chemotherapy in multivariate analysis.

Conclusion: EGFR-TKIs and ICIs are effective for treating recurrent NSCLC after surgery. Although adjuvant chemotherapy for completely resected pathological stage II to IIIA NSCLC, atezolizumab or osimertinib, has also been recently approved as adjuvant chemotherapy, there is a risk that patients who relapse after adjuvant chemotherapy will have less choice.

Introduction: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atez/Bev) is the preferred treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, biomarkers of therapeutic efficacy have remained unclear. We took a retrospective approach to explore the role of prognostic nutritional index (PNI) for predicting the outcomes of Atez/Bev treatment.

Methods: One hundred 25 HCC patients were enlisted; these patients received Atez/Bev treatment and underwent dynamic computerized tomography/magnetic resonance imaging to determine the treatment response on at least one occasion between October 2020 and January 2023, and their PNI before treatment and at the beginning of the second cycle (PNI-2c) was evaluated.

Results: During the initial evaluation, 2 (2%), 28 (22%), 70 (56%), and 25 (20%) patients exhibited a complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease (PD), respectively. Patients with non-PD tended to have higher PNI at baseline and PNI-2c than those with PD (p = 0.245 and 0.122, respectively), with optimal baseline PNI and PNI-2c cut-off values of 42.6 and 40.4, respectively. PNI at baseline could not be used to predict overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS). However, PNI-2c predicted OS and PFS (PNI-2c ≥ 40.4 vs. < 40.4: 25.3 vs. 16.2 months, p = 0.008 for OS; 12.7 vs. 8.4 months, p = 0.036 for PFS). A multivariate analysis showed a significant association between PNI-2c and OS.

Conclusions: PNI-2c is a predictor of prognosis in HCC patients treated with Atez/Bev therapy.

Introduction: Ovarian cancer is the eighth most common cause of cancer death in women. One of the major concerns is almost two-thirds of cases are typically diagnosed in the late stage as the symptoms are unspecific in the early stage of ovarian cancer. It is known that the combination of TK1 protein with CA 125 or HE4 showed better performance than either of them alone. That is why, the aim of the study was to investigate whether the TK1-specific activity (TK1 SA) could function as a complement marker for early-stage diagnosis of ovarian cancer.

Methods: The study included a set of 198 sera consisting of 134 patients with ovarian tumors (72 benign and 62 malignant) and 64 healthy age-matched controls. The TK1 SA was determined using TK1 activity by TK-Liaison and TK1 protein by AroCell TK 210 ELISA. Further, CA 125, HE4, as well as risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm index were also determined in the same set of clinical samples.

Results: The TK1 SA was significantly different between healthy compared to ovarian cancer patients (p < 0.0001). Strikingly, TK1 SA has higher sensitivity (55%) compared to other biomarkers in the detection of benign ovarian tumors. Further, the highest sensitivity was achieved by the combination of TK1 SA with CA 125 and HE4 for the detection of benign tumors as well as malignant ovarian tumors (72.2% and 88.7%). In addition, TK1 SA could significantly differentiate FIGO stage I/II from stage III/IV malignancies (p = 0.026). Follow-up of patients after surgery and chemotherapy showed a significant difference compared to TK1 SA at the time of diagnosis.

Conclusions: These results indicate that TK1 SA is a promising blood-based biomarker that could complement CA 125 and HE4 for the detection of early stages of ovarian cancer.

Introduction: Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) low expression breast malignant tumors have become a research hotspot in recent years, but it is still unclear whether HER-2 low expression represents a special subtype of breast cancer. However, this molecular type requires more effective treatment regimens in the neoadjuvant therapy stage.

Methods: This study enrolled breast cancer patients who were treated at Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital with neoadjuvant treatment between October 2011 and May 2019 and was a single-center retrospective study.

Results: A total of 1,053 breast cancer patients who received preoperative therapy, including 279 (26%) HER-2 low expression patients, were included in this retrospective study. The HER-2 low expression group had a higher proportion of patients under 50 years old than the other two molecular subtype groups (p = 0.047, 62.0% vs. 57.2% and 52.5%), and the percentage of patients with Ki67 index above 15% was lower than that in HER-2-negative and HER-2-positive patients (p < 0.001, 50.2% vs. 63.6% and 71.5%). Most of the patients with HER-2 low expression were hormone receptor (HR) positive (p < 0.001, 85.7% vs. 60.4% and 36.0%), and their pathologic complete response (pCR) rate after neoadjuvant therapy was significantly lower than that of HER-2-negative and HER-2-positive patients (p < 0.001, 5.7% vs. 11.8% and 20.5%). The results of the subgroup analysis showed HR-positive patients with HER-2 low expression had a lower pCR rate (p < 0.001, 4.6% vs. 14.6%) and objective response rate (p = 0.001, 77.8% vs. 91.0%) than HER-2-positive patients and had no significant difference in these rates compared to HER-2-negative patients. There were no significant differences in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) up to 67 months (the median follow-up time) among HER-2 low, HER-2-negative, and HER-2-positive patients. The results of Cox hazard proportional showed that the Ki67 index and T stage (T3) were independent influencing factors for DFS. In terms of OS, Ki67 index, P53, T stage, and objective response were independent influencing factors for OS in HER-2 low expression patients.

Conclusions: In general, further studies are needed to confirm that HER-2 low expression is a special breast cancer molecular subtype. The efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with HER-2 low expression is relatively poor, and the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy can predict the prognosis of patients with HER-2 low expression.