Oncology reports最新文献

Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks as the third most prevalent malignancy and second leading cause of cancer‑related fatalities worldwide. Immunotherapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy has a favorable survival benefit for patients with CRC. Unlike αβ T cells, which are prone to drug resistance, γδ T cells do not exhibit major histocompatibility complex restriction and can target tumor cells through diverse mechanisms. Recent research has demonstrated the widespread involvement of Vδ1T, Vδ2T, and γδ T17 cells in tumorigenesis and progression. In the present review, the influence of different factors, including immune checkpoint molecules, the tumor microenvironment and microorganisms, was summarized on the antitumor/protumor effects of these cells, aiming to provide insights for the development of more efficient and less toxic immunotherapy‑based anticancer drugs.

Following the publication of the above paper, it was drawn to the Editor's attention by a concerned reader that there appeared to be overlapping sections in a pair of the fluorescence reporter assay data panels shown in Fig. 4B; moreover, upon having conducted an independent investigation of the data in this paper in the Editorial Office, one of the data panels shown in this figure was strikingly similar to data that had previously appeared in different form in a paper written by different authors at a different research institute. Owing to the fact that the contentious data in the above article had already been published prior to its submission to Oncology Reports, the Editor has decided that this paper should be retracted from the Journal. The authors were asked for an explanation to account for these concerns, but the Editorial Office did not receive a satisfactory reply. The Editor apologizes to the readership for any inconvenience caused. [Oncology Reports 39: 977‑984, 2018; DOI: 10.3892/or.2017.6156].

Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer among women worldwide, characterized by a high mortality rate and propensity for metastasis. Although surgery is the standard treatment for breast cancer, there is still no effective method to inhibit tumor metastasis and improve the prognosis of patients with breast cancer after surgery. Propofol, one of the most widely used intravenous anesthetics in surgery, has exhibited a positive association with improved survival outcomes in patients with breast cancer post‑surgery. However, the underlying molecular mechanism remains to be elucidated. The present study revealed that triple negative breast cancer cells, MDA‑MB‑231 and 4T1, exposed to propofol exhibited a significant decrease in cell viability. Notably, propofol exhibited minimal cytotoxic effects on HUVECs under the same conditions. Furthermore, propofol significantly inhibited the migration and invasion ability of MDA‑MB‑231 and 4T1 cells. Propofol promoted apoptosis in 4T1 cells through upregulation of Bax and cleaved caspase 3, while downregulating B‑cell lymphoma‑extra large. Concomitantly, propofol induced cell cycle arrest of 4T1 cells by downregulating cyclin E2 and phosphorylated cell division cycle 6. Furthermore, propofol exhibited excellent anticancer efficacy in a 4T1 breast cancer allograft mouse model. The present study sheds light on the potential of propofol as an old medicine with a novel use for breast cancer treatment.

Following the publication of this paper, it was drawn to the Editor's attention by a concerned reader that certain of the western blotting data shown in Fig. 2D, the cell migration and invasion assay data in Fig. 3C, the mouse imaging pictures in Fig. 4C and D, and the H&E‑stained images in Fig. 4E and F were strikingly similar to data appearing in different form in other articles written by different authors at different research institutes that had already been submitted or published elsewhere prior to the submission of this paper to Oncology Reports. Given that the abovementioned data had already apparently been submitted or published prior to the receipt of this paper at Oncology Reports, the Editor has decided that this paper should be retracted from the Journal. After having been in contact with the authors, they accepted the decision to retract the paper. The Editor apologizes to the readership for any inconvenience caused. [Oncology Reports 45: 706‑716, 2021; DOI: 10.3892/or.2020.7880].

CD44 is a type I transmembrane glycoprotein associated with poor prognosis in various solid tumors. Since CD44 plays a critical role in tumor development by regulating cell adhesion, survival, proliferation and stemness, it has been considered a target for tumor therapy. Anti‑CD44 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been developed and applied to antibody‑drug conjugates and chimeric antigen receptor‑T cell therapy. Anti-pan‑CD44 mAbs, C₄₄Mab‑5 and C₄₄Mab‑46, which recognize both CD44 standard (CD44s) and variant isoforms were previously developed. The present study generated a mouse IgG_2a version of the anti‑pan‑CD44 mAbs (5‑mG_2a and C₄₄Mab‑46‑mG_2a) to evaluate the antitumor activities against CD44‑positive cells. Both 5‑mG_2a and C₄₄Mab‑46‑mG_2a recognized CD44s‑overexpressed CHO‑K1 (CHO/CD44s) cells and esophageal tumor cell line (KYSE770) in flow cytometry. Furthermore, both 5‑mG_2a and C₄₄Mab‑46‑mG_2a could activate effector cells in the presence of CHO/CD44s cells and exhibited complement-dependent cytotoxicity against both CHO/CD44s and KYSE770 cells. Furthermore, the administration of 5‑mG_2a and C₄₄Mab‑46‑mG_2a significantly suppressed CHO/CD44s and KYSE770 xenograft tumor development compared with the control mouse IgG_2a. These results indicate that 5‑mG_2a and C₄₄Mab‑46‑mG_2a could exert antitumor activities against CD44‑positive cancers and be a promising therapeutic regimen for tumors.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a predominant form of leukemia. Central nervous system (CNS) involvement complicates its diagnosis due to limited diagnostic tools, as well as its treatment due to inadequate therapeutic methodologies and poor prognosis. Furthermore, its incidence rate is unclear. The mechanisms of AML cell mobilization from the bone marrow (BM) to the CNS are not fully elucidated, and the molecular factors contributing to CNS infiltration are insufficiently recognized. The present review aimed to enhance the understanding of CNS involvement of AML and its impact on CNS. The latest research on the pathways and mechanisms facilitating AML cells to escape the BM and infiltrate the CNS was reviewed. Additionally, novel therapeutic strategies targeting specific molecules and genes for treating CNS involvement in AML were examined.

Cancer is a disease that poses a serious threat to human health, the occurrence and development of which involves complex molecular mechanisms. Long non‑coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and RNA‑binding proteins (RBPs) are important regulatory molecules within cells, which have garnered extensive attention in cancer research in recent years. The binding of lncRNAs and RBPs plays a crucial role in the post‑transcriptional regulation of mRNA, affecting the synthesis of proteins related to cancer by regulating the stability of mRNA. This, in turn, regulates the malignant biological behaviors of tumor cells, such as proliferation and metastasis, and serves an important role in therapeutic resistance. The present study reviewed the role of lncRNA‑RBP interactions in the regulation of mRNA stability in various malignant tumors, with a focus on the molecular mechanisms underlying this regulatory interaction. The aim of the present review was to gain a deeper understanding of these molecular mechanisms to provide new strategies and insights for the precise treatment of cancer.

Chemotherapy remains a prevalent treatment for a wide range of tumors; however, the majority of patients undergoing conventional chemotherapy experience varying levels of chemoresistance, ultimately leading to suboptimal outcomes. The present article provided an in‑depth review of chemotherapy resistance in tumors, emphasizing the underlying factors contributing to this resistance in tumor cells. It also explored recent advancements in the identification of key molecules and molecular mechanisms within the primary chemoresistant pathways.

Lung cancer is increasingly recognized as a leading cause of cancer‑related mortality. Immunotherapy has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach for lung cancer, particularly non‑small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nonetheless, the response rate to programmed cell death 1 (PD‑1) inhibitors remains less than optimal. It has been suggested that protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B) plays a crucial role in the development and progression of cancer by facilitating T cell expansion and cytotoxicity. Our previous research demonstrated that the combination of tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 (TNFR2) with immune activity treatments synergistically suppresses tumor growth. This insight led to exploring the efficacy of a combined treatment strategy involving PD‑1 inhibitors, PTP1B inhibitors and TNFR2 antibodies (triple therapy) in NSCLC. In this context, the therapeutic effectiveness of these combination immunotherapies was validated in mouse models with NSCLC by analyzing the expansion and function of immune cells, thereby assessing their impact on tumor growth. The results indicated that inhibiting PTP1B decreases the expression of PD‑L1 and TNFR2 on LLC cells, along with an increase in the proportion of CD4⁺T and CD8⁺T cells. Compared with other treatment groups, the triple therapy significantly reduced tumor volume in mice with NSCLC and extended their survival. Moreover, this combination therapy altered the distribution of myeloid‑derived suppressor cells, dendritic cells, B cells and M1 macrophages, while increasing the proportion of CD8⁺T cells and reducing the proportion of Treg cells in the spleens, lymph nodes, and tumors of NSCLC models. The triple therapy also resulted in a decrease in PD‑L1, PTP1B and TNFR2 expression within NSCLC tumor tissues in mice. Overall, the triple therapy effectively suppressed tumor growth and improved outcomes in mice with NSCLC by modulating immune cell distribution and reducing levels of target immune proteins.

Accumulating evidence indicates that the dysregulation of microRNAs (miRNAs or miRs), is associated with human malignancies and suggests a casual role of miRNAs in tumor initiation and progression. Even though it has been discovered that a number of miRNAs play significant parts in the development of colorectal cancer (CRC), it is crucial to comprehend the regulatory functions that other miRNAs play in CRC. Based on GSE183437 and GSE156719 microarray data that were obtained from Gene Expression Omnibus database, candidate miRNAs were researched. The oncogenic effects of miR‑25‑3p in different malignancies have led to its selection for additional investigation in the present study. The expression of miR‑25‑3p was verified by reverse transcription‑quantitative PCR, and its correlation with clinicopathological characteristics in patients with CRC was then investigated. In vitro assays were conducted to investigate the influence of miR‑25‑3p on the proliferative and apoptotic behaviors of HCT116 and Caco‑2 cells. The present data revealed that miR‑25‑3p exhibited one of the most significant upregulations in CRC tissues and cell lines. The expression levels of miR‑25‑3p were found to be intimately correlated with tumor size, distant metastasis, tumor‑node‑metastasis stage, and shorter overall survival rate. In terms of functionality, the downregulation of miR‑25‑3p led to the inhibition of cellular proliferation and the enhancement of apoptosis in both HCT116 and Caco‑2 cell lines. The critical tumor suppressor F‑box and WD repeat containing domain 7 (FBXW7) was identified as a direct molecular target for miR‑25‑3p, with an inverse relationship observed between the two in neoplastic tissues. Subsequent studies demonstrated that the tumor suppressive effects of miR‑25‑3p inhibitor were effectively negated by the silencing of FBXW7. Moreover, the ability of FBXW7 to inhibit the expression of several oncogenes was deemed essential for countering the anticancer effects mediated by miR‑25‑3p downregulation. These findings posit miR‑25‑3p as a promising therapeutic target and prognostic indicator for CRC.