Oncology reports最新文献

Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs), a heterogeneous group of cancers that arise from the mucosal epithelia cells in the head and neck areas, present great challenges in diagnosis, treatment and prognosis due to their complex aetiology and various clinical manifestations. Several factors, including smoking, alcohol consumption, oncogenic genes, growth factors, Epstein‑Barr virus and human papillomavirus infections can contribute to HNSCC development. The unpredictable tumour microenvironment adds to the complexity of managing HNSCC. Despite significant advances in therapies, the prediction of outcome after treatment for patients with HNSCC remains poor, and the 5‑year overall survival rate is low due to late diagnosis. Early detection greatly increases the chances of successful treatment. The present review aimed to bring together the latest findings related to the molecular mechanisms of HNSCC carcinogenesis and progression. Comprehensive genomic, transcriptomic, metabolomic, microbiome and proteomic analyses allow researchers to identify important biological markers such as genetic alterations, gene expression signatures and protein markers that drive HNSCC tumours. These biomarkers associated with the stages of initiation, progression and metastasis of cancer are useful in the management of patients with cancer in order to improve their life expectancy and quality of life.

In recent years, microRNAs (miRNAs or miRs) have been increasingly studied for their role in cancer and have shown potential as cancer biomarkers. miR‑143‑3p and miR‑143‑5p are the mature miRNAs derived from pre‑miRNA‑143. At present, there are numerous studies on the function of miR‑143‑3p in cancer progression, but there are no systematic reviews describing the function of miR‑143‑3p in cancer. It is widely considered that miR‑143‑3p is downregulated in most malignant tumors and that upstream regulators can act on this gene, which in turn regulates the corresponding target to act on the tumor. In addition, miRNA‑143‑3p can regulate target genes to affect the biological process of tumors through various signaling pathways, such as the PI3K/Akt, Wnt/β‑catenin, AKT/STAT3 and Ras‑Raf‑MEK‑ERK pathways. The present review comprehensively described the biogenesis of miR‑143‑3p, the biological functions of miR‑143‑3p and the related roles and mechanisms in different cancer types. The potential of miR‑143‑3p as a biomarker for cancer was also highlighted and valuable future research directions were discussed.

Following the publication of the above paper, it was drawn to the Editor's attention by a concerned reader that the 'Control' data panel shown for the EdU assay experiment in Fig. 6D on p. 1209 was strikingly similar to a data panel featured in Fig. 7 that had already been submitted to the journal Cancer Management and Research by different authors at different research institutes [Chen T‑J, Gao F, Yang T, Li H, Li Y, Ren H and Chen M‑W: Knockdown of linc‑POU3F3 suppresses the proliferation, apoptosis, and migration resistance of colorectal cancer. Cancer Manag Res 12: 4379‑4390, 2020]. Owing to the fact that contentious data in the above article had already been submitted for publication prior to its submission to Oncology Reports, the Editor has decided that this paper should be retracted from the Journal. The authors were asked for an explanation to account for these concerns, but the Editorial Office did not receive a reply. The Editor apologizes to the readership for any inconvenience caused. [Oncology Reports 45: 1202‑1212, 2021; DOI: 10.3892/or.2021.7949].

Cribriform morular thyroid carcinoma (CMTC) has been included within the group of thyroid tumors of uncertain histogenesis in the recent World Health Organization classification of endocrine tumors. Most CMTCs occur in young euthyroid women with multiple (and bilateral) thyroid nodules in cases associated with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) or as single nodules in sporadic cases. CMTC generally behaves indolently, while aggressiveness and mortality are associated with high‑grade CMTC. This tumor histologically displays a distinctive combination of growth patterns with morular structures. Strong diffuse nuclear and cytoplasmic immunostaining for β‑catenin is the hallmark of CMTC. Tumor cells are also positive for thyroid transcription factor‑1 and for estrogen and progesterone receptors, but negative for thyroglobulin and calcitonin. It is possible that the CMTC phenotype could result from blockage in the terminal/follicular differentiation of follicular cells (or their precursor cells) secondary to the permanent activation of the Wnt/β‑catenin pathway. In CMTC, the activation of the Wnt/β‑catenin pathway is the central pathogenetic event, which in FAP‑associated cases results from germline mutations of the APC regulator of WNT signaling pathway (APC) gene, and in sporadic cases from somatic inactivating mutations in the APC, AXIN1 and CTNNB1 genes. Estrogens appear to play a tumor‑promoting role by stimulating both the PI3K/AKT/mTOR and the RAS/RAF/MAPK signaling pathways. Additional somatic mutations (i.e. RET rearrangements, or KRAS, phosphatidylinositol‑4,5‑bisphosphate 3‑kinase catalytic subunit α, telomerase reverse transcriptase or tumor protein 53 mutations) may further potentiate the development and progression of CMTC. While hemithyroidectomy would be the treatment of choice for sporadic cases without high‑risk data, total thyroidectomy would be indicated in FAP‑associated cases. There is insufficient clinical data to propose therapies targeting the Wnt/β‑catenin pathway, but multikinase or selective inhibitors could be used in a manner analogous to that of conventional thyroid tumors. It is also unknown whether adjuvant antiestrogenic therapy could be useful in the subgroup of women undergoing surgery with high‑risk CMTC, as well as when there is tumor recurrence and/or metastasis.

Subsequently to the publication of the above article, an interested reader drew to the authors' attention that, for the scratch‑wound assay experiments shown in Fig. 3C, two images appeared to overlap [specifically, the '0 h / Control' and 0 h / OP‑B (5 μmol/l) data panels], albeit with different magnification and after a 180° rotation. The authors have examined their original data, and realize that an inadvertent error was made in assembling the images in the figure; specifically, the images of 5 and 10 μmol/l OP‑B treatment for 0 h were both misused. The corrected version of Fig. 3, showing all the correct data for Fig. 3C, is shown on the next page. Note that these errors did not affect the overall conclusions reported in the paper. All the authors agree with the publication of this corrigendum, and are grateful to the Editor of Oncology Reports for allowing them the opportunity to publish this. They also apologize to the readership for any inconvenience caused. [Oncology Reports 40: 1339‑1347, 2018; DOI: 10.3892/or.2018.6531].

Following the publication of the above paper, it was drawn to the Editor's attention by a concerned reader that there appeared to be a matching data panel comparing between one of the Transwell invasion assay experiments (the 'SW620/si‑NC' data panel) shown in Fig. 2F and Fig 6D in the following paper, written by different authors at different research institutes, that had already been published at the time of this paper's submission: Wang D, Yang T, Liu J, Liu Y, Xing N, He J, Yang J and Ai Y: Propofol inhibits the migration and invasion of glioma cells by blocking the PI3K/AKT pathway through miR‑206/ROCK1 axis. Onco Targets Ther 13: 361‑370, 2020. In addition, a potential problem regarding the design of the experiment was noted with the selection of the primers for the amplification of the miRNA miR‑485‑5p. Owing to the fact that the contentious data in the above article had already been published prior to its submission to Oncology Reports, the Editor has decided that this paper should be retracted from the Journal. The authors were asked for an explanation to account for these concerns, but the Editorial Office did not receive a reply. The Editor apologizes to the readership for any inconvenience caused. [Oncology Reports 44: 2009‑2020, 2020; DOI: 10.3892/or.2020.7758].

Ovarian cancer is a gynecological malignant tumor with the highest mortality rate, and chemotherapy resistance seriously affects patient therapeutic outcomes. It has been shown that the high expression of anti‑apoptotic proteins Bcl‑2 and Bcl‑xL is closely related to ovarian cancer chemotherapy resistance. Therefore, reducing Bcl‑2 and Bcl‑xL expression levels may be essential for reversing drug resistance in ovarian cancer. ABT‑737 is a BH3‑only protein mimetic, which can effectively inhibit the expression of the anti‑apoptotic proteins Bcl‑xL and Bcl‑2. Although it has been shown that ABT‑737 can increase the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to cisplatin, the specific molecular mechanism remains unclear and requires further investigation. In the present study, the results revealed that ABT‑737 can significantly increase the activation levels of JNK and ASK1 induced by cisplatin in A2780/DDP cells, which are cisplatin‑resistant ovarian cancer cells. Inhibition of the JNK and ASK1 pathway could significantly reduce cisplatin cytotoxicity increased by ABT‑737 in A2780/DDP cells, while inhibiting the ASK1 pathway could reduce JNK activation. In addition, it was further determined that ABT‑737 could increase reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels in A2780/DDP cells induced by cisplatin. Furthermore, the inhibition of ROS could significantly reduce JNK and ASK1 activation and ABT‑737‑mediated increased cisplatin cytotoxicity in A2780/DDP cells. Overall, the current data identified that activation of the ROS‑ASK1‑JNK signaling axis plays an essential role in the ability of ABT‑737 to increase cisplatin sensitivity in A2780/DDP cells. Therefore, upregulation the ROS‑ASK1‑JNK signaling axis is a potentially novel molecular mechanism by which ABT‑737 can enhance cisplatin sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells. In addition, the present research can also provide new therapeutic strategies and new therapeutic targets for patients with cisplatin‑resistant ovarian cancer with high Bcl‑2/Bcl‑xL expression patterns.

Following the publication of this article, an interested reader drew to the authors' attention that two pairs of protein bands featured in the western blots in Fig. 3A and 5D on p. 679 and 681 respectively appeared to be strikingly similar. After having re‑examined their original data, the authors realized that Fig. 5D had been assembled incorrectly. The revised version of Fig. 5, now including the correct data for Fig. 5D, is shown on the next page. Note that the errors made in terms of assembling the data in Fig. 5 did not greatly affect either the results or the conclusions reported in this paper, and all the authors agree to the publication of this corrigendum. The authors regret that these errors went unnoticed prior to the publication of their article, are grateful to the Editor of Oncology Reports for allowing them this opportunity to publish this corrigendum. They also apologize to the readership for any inconvenience caused. [Oncology Reports  33: 675‑684, 2015; DOI: 10.3892/or.2014.3653].

Ferroptosis inducers (FIN) have a key role in cancer therapy and provide novel and innovative treatment strategies. Although many researchers have performed FIN screening of synthetic compounds, studies on the identification of FIN from natural products are limited, particularly in the field of drug development and combination therapy. In this review, this gap was addressed by comprehensively summarizing recent studies on ferroptosis. The causes of ferroptosis were categorized into driving and defensive factors, elucidating key pathways and targets. Next, through summarizing research on natural products that induce ferroptosis, the study elaborated in detail on the natural products that have FIN functions. Their discovery and development were also described and insight for clinical drug development was provided. In addition, the mechanisms of action were analyzed and potential combination therapies, resistance reversal and structural enhancements were presented. By highlighting the potential of natural products in inducing ferroptosis for cancer treatment, this review may serve as a reference for utilizing these compounds against cancer. It not only showed the significance of natural products but may also promote further investigation into their therapeutic effects, thus encouraging research in this field.

Subsequently to the publication of the above paper, an interested reader drew to the authors' attention that there appeared to be two instances of overlapping data panels comparing between the cell migration and invasion assay data shown in Figs. 4 and 6 on p. 143 and 145, respectively, such that data which were intended to represent the results from differently performed experiments had apparently been derived from the same original sources. In addition, the authors themselves realized that incorrect western blotting data for Snail protein in Fig. 10A on p. 147 had been included in the figure.  The authors were able to re‑examine their original data files, and realized that the affected data panels in these figures had inadvertently been incorporated into them incorrectly. The revised versions of Figs. 4, 6, and 10, featuring the correct data for the 'NC / Control' panels in Fig. 4B and C and the 'siRNA2 / ATP 12 h' panels in Fig. 4A and B, a replacement data panel for the 'siRNA1 / Control' experiment in Fig. 6, and the correct western blotting data for Snail protein in Fig. 10A (together with a revised histogram for the MCF7 cell line relating to Fig. 10A) are shown on the next three pages. The authors wish to emphasize that the errors made in compiling these figures did not affect the overall conclusions reported in the paper, and they are grateful to the Editor of Oncology Reports for allowing them the opportunity to publish this corrigendum. All the authors agree to the publication of this corrigendum, and also apologize to the readership for any inconvenience caused. [Oncology Reports 39: 138‑150, 2018; DOI: 10.3892/or.2017.6081].