Oncology reports最新文献

Subsequently to the publication of the above paper, the authors drew to the attention of the Editorial Office that they made a couple of errors in terms of the data assembly in Figs. 2 and 4 in their paper; specifically, the Transwell assay data shown for the 'miR-320a+/FoxM1+' panel in Fig. 5D on p. 1923 also appeared as the 'ACTN/NC' data panel in Fig. 4E on the same page (Fig. 4E contained the erroneously duplicated panel). In addition, data featured in Fig. 2D of the above paper were strikingly similar to data that appeared in Fig. 6e of the following paper, published subsequently to this article, written by different authors (although a Dr Shiyue Zhao worked in the molecular biology laboratory of Harbin Medical University from 2017 to 2018, and the research collaboration was conducted with Dr Chenlong Li's research group): Li C, Zheng H, Hou W, Bao H, Xiong J, Che W, Gu Y, Sun H and Liang P: Long non-coding RNA linc00645 promotes. TGF-β-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition by regulating miR-205-3p-ZEB1 axis in glioma. Cell Death Dis 10: 17, 2019. Finally, after having conducted an independent investigation of the data in this paper, the Editorial Office noted that one of the Petri dish images in Fig. 2C was also strikingly similar to data that appeared in Fig. 2H of the abovementioned article in the journal Cell Death & Disease. After having considered the authors' request for corrigendum, in view of the problems that were identified with the data, the Editor of Oncology Reports has decided that, owing to a lack of confidence in the presented data, the paper should instead be retracted from the journal. After having informed the authors of this decision, they accepted the decision to retract this paper. The Editor apologizes to the readership for any inconvenience caused.  [Oncology Reports 40: 1917‑1926, 2018; DOI: 10.3892/or.2018.6597].

Inotuzumab ozogamicin (IO), a novel therapeutic drug for relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (RR)‑(ALL), is a humanized anti‑cluster of differentiation (CD) 22 monoclonal antibody conjugated with calicheamicin that causes DNA single‑ and double‑strand breaks. Although the efficacy of IO is significantly improved compared with that of conventional chemotherapies, the prognosis for RR‑ALL remains poor, highlighting the need for more effective treatment strategies. The present study examined the role of DNA damage repair inhibition using the poly (ADP‑ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors olaparib or talazoparib on the enhancement of the antitumor effects of IO on B‑ALL cells in vitro. The Reh, Philadelphia (Ph)^‑B‑ALL and the SUP‑B15 Ph⁺ B‑ALL cell lines were used for experiments. Both cell lines were ~90% CD22⁺. The half‑maximal inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) values of IO were 5.3 and 49.7 ng/ml for Reh and SUP‑B15 cells, respectively. The IC₅₀ values of IO combined with minimally toxic concentrations of olaparib or talazoparib were 0.8 and 2.9 ng/ml for Reh cells, respectively, and 36.1 and 39.6 ng/ml for SUP‑B15 cells, respectively. The combination index of IO with olaparib and talazoparib were 0.19 and 0.56 for Reh cells and 0.76 and 0.89 for SUP‑B15 cells, demonstrating synergistic effects in all combinations. Moreover, the addition of minimally toxic concentrations of PARP inhibitors augmented IO‑induced apoptosis. The alkaline comet assay, which quantitates the amount of DNA strand breaks, was used to investigate the degree to which DNA damage observed 1 h after IO administration was repaired 6 h later, reflecting successful repair of DNA strand breaks. However, DNA strand breaks persisted 6 h after IO administration combined with olaparib or talazoparib, suggesting inhibition of the repair processes by PARP inhibitors. Adding olaparib or talazoparib thus synergized the antitumor effects of IO by inhibiting DNA strand break repair via the inhibition of PARP.

Cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), also known as CD8⁺ T cells, participate in immune function by secreting various cytokines after recognizing specific antigens and class I major histocompatibility complex molecules associated with tumor cells, and thus have a key role in antitumor immunity. However, certain CD8⁺ T cells show low reactivity and thus cannot effectively remove tumor cells or viral antigens. Due to this heterogeneity, effective biomarkers representing these differences in CD8+ cells are needed. The identification of suitable biomarkers will also enhance the management of cancer treatment. Recent research has improved the understanding of CD8⁺ T lymphocytes in the tumor microenvironment and circulatory system. Treatment efficacy is impacted directly by the pathogenic response of CTLs, and thus, the use of adjuvant therapies to address these pathological changes, e.g., stimulating the increase in the proportion of reactive T cells or suppressing the proportion of terminally exhausted T cells, would be advantageous.

2',3',4'‑trihydroxyflavone (2‑D08), a SUMO E2 inhibitor, has several biological functions, including anticancer activity, but its effects on uterine leiomyosarcoma (Ut‑LMS) are unknown. The anticancer activity of 2‑D08 was explored in an in vitro model using SK‑LMS‑1 and SK‑UT‑1B cells (human Ut‑LMS cells). Treatment with 2‑D08 inhibited cell viability in a dose‑ and time‑dependent manner and significantly inhibited the colony‑forming ability of Ut‑LMS cells. In SK‑UT‑1B cells treated with 2‑D08, flow cytometric analysis revealed a slight increase in apoptotic rates, while cell cycle progression remained unaffected. Western blotting revealed elevated levels of RIP1, indicating induction of necrosis, but LC3B levels remained unchanged, suggesting no effect on autophagy. A lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay confirmed increased LDH release, further supporting the induction of apoptosis and necrosis by 2‑D08 in SK‑UT‑1B cells. 2‑D08‑induced production of reactive oxygen species and apoptosis progression were observed in SK‑LMS‑1 cells. Using Ki67 staining and bromodeoxyuridine assays, it was found that 2‑D08 suppressed proliferation in SK‑LMS‑1 cells, while treatment for 48 h led to cell‑cycle arrest. 2‑D08 upregulated p21 protein expression in SK‑LMS‑1 cells and promoted apoptosis through caspase‑3. Evaluation of α‑SM‑actin, calponin 1 and TAGLN expression indicated that 2‑D08 did not directly initiate smooth muscle phenotypic switching in SK‑LMS‑1 cells. Transcriptome analysis on 2‑D08‑treated SK‑LMS‑1 cells identified significant differences in gene expression and suggested that 2‑D08 modulates cell‑cycle‑ and apoptosis‑related pathways. The analysis identified several differentially expressed genes and significant enrichment for biological processes related to DNA replication and molecular functions associated with the apoptotic process. It was concluded that 2‑D08 exerts antitumor effects in Ut‑LMS cells by modulating multiple signaling pathways and that 2‑D08 may be a promising candidate for the treatment of human Ut‑LMS. The present study expanded and developed knowledge regarding Ut‑LMS management and indicated that 2‑D08 represents a notable finding in the exploration of fresh treatment options for such cancerous tumors.

Following the publication of the above paper, it was drawn to the Editors' attention by a concerned reader that the data obtained from sphere‑forming assay experiments shown in Figs. 4C‑F and 8B and C, and western blotting data in Figs. 4A and 8A, were strikingly similar to data appearing in different form in other articles by different authors from different research institutes that had already been published, one of which has been retracted. Moreover, a pair of data panels comparing between Fig. 4E and 8C were partly overlapping, such that these data appear to have been derived from the same original source. Owing to the fact that the contentious data in the above article had already been published elsewhere prior to its submission to Oncology Reports, the Editor has decided that this paper should be retracted from the Journal. The authors were asked for an explanation to account for these concerns, but the Editorial Office did not receive a reply. The Editor apologizes to the readership for any inconvenience caused. [Oncology Reports 35: 1204‑1212, 2016; DOI: 10.3892/or.2015.4437].

Ursolic acid (UA), a pentacyclic triterpenoid that has been found in a broad variety of fruits, spices and medicinal plants, has various biological effects such as reducing inflammation, protecting cells from damage, and preserving brain function. However, its impact on ferroptosis in cancer stem‑like cells remains unexplored. The present study investigated the effect of UA on MDA‑MB‑231 and BT‑549 cell‑derived triple‑negative breast CSCs (BCSCs) and its potential ferroptosis pathway. The effects of ferroptosis on BCSCs were demonstrated by the detection of ferroptosis‑related indexes including the intracellular level of glutathione, malondialdehyde, reactive oxygen species and iron. The effects of UA on the biological behaviors of BCSCs were analyzed by Cell Counting Kit‑8, stemness indexes detection and mammosphere formation assay. The mechanism of UA induction on BCSCs was explored by reverse transcription‑quantitative PCR and western blotting. BALB/c‑nude mice were subcutaneously injected with MDA‑MB‑231‑derived BCSCs to establish xenograft models to detect the effects of UA in vivo. The results revealed that BCSCs have abnormal iron metabolism and are less susceptible to ferroptosis. UA effectively reduces the stemness traits and proliferation of BCSCs in spheroids and mice models by promoting ferroptosis. It was observed that UA stabilizes Kelch‑like ECH‑associated protein 1 and suppresses nuclear factor erythroid‑related factor 2 (NRF2) activation. These findings suggested that the ability of UA to trigger ferroptosis through the inhibition of the NRF2 pathway could be a promising approach for treating BCSCs, potentially addressing metastasis and drug resistance in triple‑negative breast cancer (TNBC). This expands the clinical applications of UA and provides a theoretical basis for its use in TNBC treatment.

Immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), is undoubtedly one of the major breakthroughs in lung cancer research. Patient survival and prognosis have all been improved as a result, although numerous patients do not respond to immunotherapy due to various immune escape mechanisms of the tumor cells. Recent preclinical and clinical evidence has shown that stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), also known as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy, has a prominent immune priming effect that could elicit antitumor immunity against specific tumor antigens and destroy distant tumor cells, thereby achieving the elusive abscopal effect, with the resulting immuno‑active tumor environment also being more conducive to ICIs. Some landmark trials have already demonstrated the survival benefit of the dynamic duo of SBRT plus immunotherapy in metastatic non‑small‑cell lung cancer, while others such as PEMBRO‑RT further suggest that the addition of SBRT to immunotherapy could expand the current indication to those who have historically responded poorly to ICIs. In the present review, the biological mechanisms that drive the synergistic effect of SBRT and immunotherapy were first briefly outlined; then, the current understanding from clinical trials was summarized and new insight into the evolving role of immunotherapy and SBRT synergy in lung cancer treatment was provided. Finally, novel avenues for discovery were highlighted. The innovation of the present review lies in the inclusion of non‑ICI immunotherapy in the discussion, which provides a more comprehensive view on the current development and future trend of SBRT + immunotherapy synergy.

Breast cancer, a prominent cause of mortality among women, develops from abnormal growth of breast tissue, thereby rendering it one of the most commonly detected cancers in the female population. Although numerous treatment strategies are available for breast cancer, discordance in terms of effective treatment and response still exists. Recently, the potential of signaling pathways and transcription factors has gained substantial attention in the cancer community; therefore, understanding their role will assist researchers in comprehending the onset and advancement of breast cancer. Forkhead box (FOX) proteins, which are important transcription factors, are considered crucial regulators of various cellular activities, including cell division and proliferation. The present study explored several subclasses of FOX proteins and their possible role in breast carcinogenesis, followed by the interaction between microRNA (miRNA) and FOX proteins. This interaction is implicated in promoting cell infiltration into surrounding tissues, ultimately leading to metastasis. The various roles that FOX proteins play in breast cancer development, their intricate relationships with miRNA, and their involvement in therapeutic resistance highlight the complexity of breast cancer dynamics. Therefore, recognizing the progress and challenges in current treatments is crucial because, despite advancements, persistent disparities in treatment effectiveness underscore the need for ongoing research, with future studies emphasizing the necessity for targeted strategies that account for the multifaceted aspects of breast cancer.