Oncology reports最新文献

Cancer is a disease that poses a serious threat to human health, the occurrence and development of which involves complex molecular mechanisms. Long non‑coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and RNA‑binding proteins (RBPs) are important regulatory molecules within cells, which have garnered extensive attention in cancer research in recent years. The binding of lncRNAs and RBPs plays a crucial role in the post‑transcriptional regulation of mRNA, affecting the synthesis of proteins related to cancer by regulating the stability of mRNA. This, in turn, regulates the malignant biological behaviors of tumor cells, such as proliferation and metastasis, and serves an important role in therapeutic resistance. The present study reviewed the role of lncRNA‑RBP interactions in the regulation of mRNA stability in various malignant tumors, with a focus on the molecular mechanisms underlying this regulatory interaction. The aim of the present review was to gain a deeper understanding of these molecular mechanisms to provide new strategies and insights for the precise treatment of cancer.

Chemotherapy remains a prevalent treatment for a wide range of tumors; however, the majority of patients undergoing conventional chemotherapy experience varying levels of chemoresistance, ultimately leading to suboptimal outcomes. The present article provided an in‑depth review of chemotherapy resistance in tumors, emphasizing the underlying factors contributing to this resistance in tumor cells. It also explored recent advancements in the identification of key molecules and molecular mechanisms within the primary chemoresistant pathways.

The global obesity epidemic, attributed to sedentary lifestyles, unhealthy diets, genetics and environmental factors, has led to over 1.9 billion adults being classified as overweight and 650 million living with obesity. Despite advancements in early detection and treatment, lung cancer prognosis remains poor due to late diagnoses and limited therapies. The obesity paradox challenges conventional thinking by suggesting that individuals with obesity and certain diseases, including cancer, may have an improved prognosis compared with their counterparts of a normal weight. This observation has prompted investigations to understand protective mechanisms, including potentially favorable adipokine secretion and metabolic reserves that contribute to tolerating cancer treatments. However, understanding the association between obesity and lung cancer is complex. While smoking is the primary risk factor of lung cancer, obesity may independently impact lung cancer risk, particularly in non‑smokers. Adipose tissue dysfunction, including low‑grade chronic inflammation, and hormonal changes contribute to lung cancer development and progression. Obesity‑related factors may also influence treatment responses and survival outcomes in patients with lung cancer. The impact of obesity on treatment modalities such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery is still under investigation. Challenges in managing patients with obesity and cancer include increased surgical complexity, higher rates of postoperative complications and limited treatment options due to comorbidities. Targeted interventions aimed at reducing obesity prevalence and promoting healthy lifestyles are crucial for lung cancer prevention. The impact of obesity on lung cancer is multifaceted and requires further research to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and develop personalized interventions for prevention and treatment.

Lung cancer is increasingly recognized as a leading cause of cancer‑related mortality. Immunotherapy has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach for lung cancer, particularly non‑small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nonetheless, the response rate to programmed cell death 1 (PD‑1) inhibitors remains less than optimal. It has been suggested that protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B) plays a crucial role in the development and progression of cancer by facilitating T cell expansion and cytotoxicity. Our previous research demonstrated that the combination of tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 (TNFR2) with immune activity treatments synergistically suppresses tumor growth. This insight led to exploring the efficacy of a combined treatment strategy involving PD‑1 inhibitors, PTP1B inhibitors and TNFR2 antibodies (triple therapy) in NSCLC. In this context, the therapeutic effectiveness of these combination immunotherapies was validated in mouse models with NSCLC by analyzing the expansion and function of immune cells, thereby assessing their impact on tumor growth. The results indicated that inhibiting PTP1B decreases the expression of PD‑L1 and TNFR2 on LLC cells, along with an increase in the proportion of CD4⁺T and CD8⁺T cells. Compared with other treatment groups, the triple therapy significantly reduced tumor volume in mice with NSCLC and extended their survival. Moreover, this combination therapy altered the distribution of myeloid‑derived suppressor cells, dendritic cells, B cells and M1 macrophages, while increasing the proportion of CD8⁺T cells and reducing the proportion of Treg cells in the spleens, lymph nodes, and tumors of NSCLC models. The triple therapy also resulted in a decrease in PD‑L1, PTP1B and TNFR2 expression within NSCLC tumor tissues in mice. Overall, the triple therapy effectively suppressed tumor growth and improved outcomes in mice with NSCLC by modulating immune cell distribution and reducing levels of target immune proteins.

Accumulating evidence indicates that the dysregulation of microRNAs (miRNAs or miRs), is associated with human malignancies and suggests a casual role of miRNAs in tumor initiation and progression. Even though it has been discovered that a number of miRNAs play significant parts in the development of colorectal cancer (CRC), it is crucial to comprehend the regulatory functions that other miRNAs play in CRC. Based on GSE183437 and GSE156719 microarray data that were obtained from Gene Expression Omnibus database, candidate miRNAs were researched. The oncogenic effects of miR‑25‑3p in different malignancies have led to its selection for additional investigation in the present study. The expression of miR‑25‑3p was verified by reverse transcription‑quantitative PCR, and its correlation with clinicopathological characteristics in patients with CRC was then investigated. In vitro assays were conducted to investigate the influence of miR‑25‑3p on the proliferative and apoptotic behaviors of HCT116 and Caco‑2 cells. The present data revealed that miR‑25‑3p exhibited one of the most significant upregulations in CRC tissues and cell lines. The expression levels of miR‑25‑3p were found to be intimately correlated with tumor size, distant metastasis, tumor‑node‑metastasis stage, and shorter overall survival rate. In terms of functionality, the downregulation of miR‑25‑3p led to the inhibition of cellular proliferation and the enhancement of apoptosis in both HCT116 and Caco‑2 cell lines. The critical tumor suppressor F‑box and WD repeat containing domain 7 (FBXW7) was identified as a direct molecular target for miR‑25‑3p, with an inverse relationship observed between the two in neoplastic tissues. Subsequent studies demonstrated that the tumor suppressive effects of miR‑25‑3p inhibitor were effectively negated by the silencing of FBXW7. Moreover, the ability of FBXW7 to inhibit the expression of several oncogenes was deemed essential for countering the anticancer effects mediated by miR‑25‑3p downregulation. These findings posit miR‑25‑3p as a promising therapeutic target and prognostic indicator for CRC.

Phenformin, a biguanide compound, has attracted increased attention due to its prominent antitumor activity. As a multi‑target agent, the antitumor effects of phenformin involve a wide range of factors, including inhibition of mitochondrial complex I, activation of AMP‑activated protein kinase, impact on the tumor microenvironment, suppression of cancer stem cells and others. In addition, phenformin has been shown to markedly augment the effectiveness of various clinical treatment methods, including radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy. It is noteworthy that breakthrough progress has been made in the treatment of cancer with phenformin with application in clinical trials for the treatment of melanoma. Phenformin not only reduces the lesion area of patients, but also enhances the efficacy of dalafinib/trimetinib. In the present review, the novel breakthroughs in the antitumor effects and mechanisms of phenformin were discussed. In addition, the current review focuses on the clinical development value of phenformin, striving to provide new insights into the future research direction of phenformin in the field of tumor treatment.

Subsequently to the publication of the above paper, an interested reader drew to the authors' attention that the control western blots shown for Fig. 1A and B on p. 908 and Fig. 8A and C on p. 911 were apparently the same, where different experiments were intended to have been portrayed. After having re‑examined their original data files, the authors realized that these figures had been published with the control western blots shown incorrectly for Fig. 1A and 8C. The  corrected versions of this pair of figures are shown on the next page. Note that the corrections made to these figures do not affect the overall conclusions reported in the paper. The authors are grateful to the Editor of Oncology Reports for allowing them the opportunity to publish this Corrigendum, and apologize to the readership for any inconvenience caused. [Oncology Reports 33: 905‑912, 2015; DOI: 10.3892/or.2014.3656].

Following the publication of this paper, it was drawn to the Editor's attention by a concerned reader that certain of the Transwell invasion assay data shown in Fig. 3B on p. 839 were strikingly similar to data that had already appeared in another article written by different authors at different research institutes [Mao Y, Zhang L, Yuan L, Yan M and He Y: MiR‑218 suppresses cell progression by targeting APC in cervical cancer. Int J Clin Exp Pathol: 10, 2259‑2269, 2017]. Owing to the fact that the contentious data in the above article had already been published prior to its submission to Oncology Reports, the Editor has decided that this paper should be retracted from the Journal. The authors were asked for an explanation to account for these concerns, but the Editorial Office did not receive a reply. The Editor apologizes to the readership for any inconvenience caused. [Oncology Reports 38: 837‑842, 2017; DOI: 10.3892/or.2017.5768].

Lack of effective tumor‑specific delivery systems remains an unmet clinical challenge for the employment of chemotherapy using cytotoxic drugs. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have recently been investigated for their potential as an efficient drug‑delivery platform, due to their good biodistribution, biocompatibility and low immunogenicity. In the present study, the formulation of GE11 peptide‑modified EVs (GE11‑EVs) loaded with doxorubicin (Dox‑GE11‑EVs), was developed to target epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)‑positive tumor cells. The results obtained demonstrated that GE11‑EVs exhibited highly efficient targeting and drug delivery to EGFR‑positive tumor cells compared with non‑modified EVs. Furthermore, treatment with Dox‑GE11‑EVs led to a significantly inhibition of cell proliferation and increased apoptosis of EGFR‑positive tumor cells compared with Dox‑EVs and free Dox treatments. In addition, it was observed that treatment with either free Dox or Dox‑EVs exhibited a high level of cytotoxicity to normal cells, whereas treatment with Dox‑GE11‑EVs had only a limited effect on cell viability of normal cells. Taken together, the findings of the present study demonstrated that the engineered Dox‑GE11‑EVs can treat EGFR‑positive tumors more accurately and have higher safety than traditional tumor therapies.

Interleukin‑17 (IL‑17), an inflammatory cytokine primarily secreted by T helper 17 cells, serves a crucial role in numerous inflammatory diseases and malignancies via its receptor, IL‑17R. In addition to stimulating inflammatory responses, IL‑17 exhibits dual functions in tumors, exerting both pro‑ and antitumor effects. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most common pancreatic malignancy and accounts for >90% of pancreatic cancer cases. PDAC is characterized by a prominent stromal microenvironment with significant heterogeneity, which contributes to treatment resistance. IL‑17/IL‑17R signaling has a notable effect on tumorigenesis, the tumor microenvironment and treatment efficacy in various cancer types, including PDAC. However, the specific mechanisms of IL‑17/IL‑17R signaling in pancreatic cancer remain uncertain. This review presents a brief overview of the current knowledge and recent advances in the role and functional mechanisms of IL‑17/IL‑17R signaling in pancreatic cancer. Furthermore, the potential of IL‑17‑targeted therapeutic strategies for PDAC treatment is also discussed.