OTO Open最新文献

As competitiveness to obtain a residency position in the field of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (Oto-HNS) has continued to rise, applicants have endeavored to set themselves apart. One increasingly popular strategy is maximizing research output. Over the past 6 years, applicant metrics such as board scores and volunteer and work experiences have risen incrementally, while research production has more than doubled, from 8.4 mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications in 2016 to 17.2 in 2022. This coincides with the exponential surge of new research fellowships among Oto-HNS departments over a similar period, which is now up to at least 68 advertised positions. With a significant difference between the research production of matched and unmatched applicants, programs may be signaling a positive bias towards research-heavy applicants. Whether this is intended and/or preferable should be examined more closely.

Objective: To evaluate the readability, understandability, actionability, and accuracy of online resources covering vestibular migraine (VM).

Study design: Cross-sectional descriptive study design.

Setting: Digital collection of websites appearing on Google search.

Methods: Google searches were conducted to identify common online resources for VM. We examined readability using the Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level scores, understandability and actionability using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT), and accuracy by comparing the website contents to the consensus definition of "probable vestibular migraine."

Results: Eleven of the most popular websites were analyzed. Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level averaged at a 13th-grade level (range: 9th-18th). FRE scores averaged 35.5 (range: 9.1-54.4). No website had a readability grade level at the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality recommended 5th-grade level or an equivalent FRE score of 90 or greater. Understandability scores varied ranging from 49% to 88% (mean 70%). Actionability scores varied more, ranging from 12% to 87% (mean 44%). There was substantial inter-rater agreement for both PEMAT understandability scoring (mean κ = 0.76, SD = 0.08) and actionability scoring (mean κ = 0.65, SD = 0.08). Three sites included all 3 "probable vestibular migraine" diagnostic criteria as worded in the consensus statement.

Conclusion: The quality of online resources for VM is poor overall in terms of readability, actionability, and agreement with diagnostic criteria.

Objective: To quantify postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) incidence in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients, and assess the economic implications of chemoprophylaxis.

Study design: Retrospective cost-effective analysis.

Setting: Fifty-three health care organizations.

Methods: The TriNetX Research Network was queried to identify the 1-month VTE rate in HNC patients undergoing neck dissection from 2012 to 2022. A literature search provided additional postsurgical VTE rates in HNC patients. Costs of prophylactic heparin and enoxaparin were obtained from a drug wholesaler, and VTE-associated medical costs were sourced from the literature. A break-even analysis determined the absolute risk reduction (ARR) in the VTE rate necessary for a medication to break-even on cost.

Results: In TriNetX, 8193 HNC surgical patients underwent neck dissection, and an additional 1640 patients underwent neck dissection plus free flap reconstruction without chemoprophylaxis. Respective 1-month VTE rates were 1.3% (n = 103) and 2.5% (n = 41). Four additional studies of 1546 postoperative HNC patients not prescribed chemoprophylaxis reported a mean VTE rate of 3.8% (n = 59), ranging from 1.9% to 13.0%. At $8.40 per week, heparin resulted in cost savings if it decreased the VTE rate by an ARR of at least 0.05%, while enoxaparin, at $23.66 per week, needed to achieve a 0.14% ARR. Considering potential added costs from bleeding complications, heparin, and enoxaparin remained cost-effective if chemoprophylaxis did not increase bleeding complications by an absolute risk of more than 2.86% and 2.79%, respectively.

Conclusion: Postoperative VTE rates varied in HNC patients. Despite this, achievable ARRs suggested the potential cost-effectiveness of routine chemoprophylaxis with heparin and enoxaparin.

Objective: Tragal pumping (TP) is a practice of pushing on the tragus to raise pressure within the external auditory canal and is a commonly recommended adjunctive maneuver believed to facilitate the introduction of ototopical medications into the middle ear cavity via a tympanostomy tube. To investigate the efficacy of TP in the penetration of eardrops into the middle ear cavity via tympanostomy tube, we established the novel tympanostomy tube-rat model. We investigated the histology of the middle ear to determine the efficacy in moving fluid into the middle ear.

Study design: Prospective controlled animal study.

Setting: Animal laboratory in a university hospital.

Methods: Ten rats were recruited, and a tympanostomy tube insertion and green dye eardrops into outer ears were performed on bilateral ears. TP was performed only on 1 ear and was not applied on the other ear in each rat. Green dye in a middle ear cavity in hematoxylin and eosin-stained temporal bone sections was evaluated by blinded experts in microscopic anatomy (staining grade) and by using Image J software (staining level). The results of these 2 methods were statistically validated.

Results: The staining grade (P < .001) and the staining level (P < .001) were significantly higher in the ears which we applied TP than in the control ears. The results of 2 methods were significantly and positively correlated (r = .898, P < .001).

Conclusion: Our results showed that the TP accelerate the penetration of eardrops into the middle ear cavity in the tympanostomy tube-rat model.

Objective: To determine the effect of smoking history on the risk of developing obstructive eustachian tube dysfunction (OETD).

Study design: Cross-sectional review.

Setting: National database.

Methods: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999 to present) was analyzed. OETD was defined as middle ear pressure less than -100 decapascals (daPa). Nonsmokers, current smokers, with tympanometry data were analyzed. Patients under the age of 18, with myringotomy tubes, or with a sinus problem/earache/cold in the past 24 hours were excluded. The relative risks (RRs) for developing OETD were calculated for nonsmokers versus smokers and those with greater versus less than 10, 20, and 30 pack years (py).

Results: A total of 9472 patients met inclusion criteria (54.1% female, 75.9% non-Hispanic, mean age 43, 20.3% smokers). The RR of having OETD for smokers versus nonsmokers was 1.75 [95% confidence interval, CI: 1.45-2.11]. The RR of having OETD for patients with a 10+ py was 1.97 [95% CI 1.57-2.47], 20+ py was 2.29 [95% CI 1.76-2.95], and 30 py or greater was 2.08 [95% CI 1.49-2.90].

Conclusion: In this study, smoking roughly doubled the risk of developing OETD, as represented by a single measurement of negative middle ear pressure less than -100 daPa. The definition of OETD used in this study was limited, as it did not include symptomology, and more work is needed to examine additional covariates. However, these results may guide future research to better counsel and screen patients for OETD.

Objective: To use pharyngeal pressure recordings to distinguish different upper airway collapse patterns in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients, and to assess whether these pressure recordings correlate with candidacy assessment for hypoglossal nerve stimulator (HGNS) implantation.

Study design: Prospective case series.

Setting: Single tertiary-quaternary care academic center.

Methods: Subjects with OSA prospectively underwent simultaneous drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) and transnasal pharyngeal pressure recording with a pressure-transducing catheter. Pressure was recorded in the nasopharynx and oropharynx, and endoscopic collapse patterns were classified based on site, extent, and direction of collapse. Pressure recordings were classified categorically by waveform shape as well as numerically by inspiratory and expiratory amplitudes and slopes. Waveform shape, amplitude, and slope were then compared with the endoscopic findings.

Results: Twenty-five subjects with OSA were included. Nasopharyngeal waveform shape was associated with the extent of collapse at the level of the palate (P = .001). Oropharyngeal waveform shape was associated with anatomical site of collapse (P < .001) and direction of collapse (P = .019) below the level of the palate. Pressure amplitudes and slopes were also associated with the extent of collapse at various sites. Waveform shape was also associated with favorable collapse pattern on endoscopy for HGNS implantation (P = .043), as well as surgical candidacy for HGNS (P = .004).

Conclusion: Characteristic pharyngeal pressure waveforms are associated with different airway collapse patterns. Pharyngeal pressure is a promising adjunct to DISE in the sleep surgery candidacy evaluation.

Objective: Evaluate the quality of responses from Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) models compared to the answers for "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) from the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) for Ménière's disease (MD).

Study design: Comparative analysis.

Setting: The AAO-HNS CPG for MD includes FAQs that clinicians can give to patients for MD-related questions. The ability of ChatGPT to properly educate patients regarding MD is unknown.

Methods: ChatGPT-3.5 and 4.0 were each prompted with 16 questions from the MD FAQs. Each response was rated in terms of (1) comprehensiveness, (2) extensiveness, (3) presence of misleading information, and (4) quality of resources. Readability was assessed using Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES).

Results: ChatGPT-3.5 was comprehensive in 5 responses whereas ChatGPT-4.0 was comprehensive in 9 (31.3% vs 56.3%, P = .2852). ChatGPT-3.5 and 4.0 were extensive in all responses (P = 1.0000). ChatGPT-3.5 was misleading in 5 responses whereas ChatGPT-4.0 was misleading in 3 (31.3% vs 18.75%, P = .6851). ChatGPT-3.5 had quality resources in 10 responses whereas ChatGPT-4.0 had quality resources in 16 (62.5% vs 100%, P = .0177). AAO-HNS CPG FRES (62.4 ± 16.6) demonstrated an appropriate readability score of at least 60, while both ChatGPT-3.5 (39.1 ± 7.3) and 4.0 (42.8 ± 8.5) failed to meet this standard. All platforms had FKGL means that exceeded the recommended level of 6 or lower.

Conclusion: While ChatGPT-4.0 had significantly better resource reporting, both models have room for improvement in being more comprehensive, more readable, and less misleading for patients.

Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of various topical prophylaxis strategies against posttympanostomy otorrhea using a break-even analysis.

Study design: An economic decision analysis of data collected from purchasing records and the literature.

Setting: An academic center.

Methods: Costs of various strategies were calculated by querying our institution's pharmacy as well as GoodRX.com drug prices. Posttympanostomy otorrhea rates were acquired from a review of the literature. Costs for treatment of otorrhea were based upon our institution's self-pay patient charges. A break-even analysis was performed to determine the required absolute risk reduction ( $\mathrm{ARR}$ ) in otorrhea rate to make prophylactic treatment cost-effective.

Results: The most expensive strategy ciprofloxacin/hydrocortisone otic ($626.83) was not cost-effective unless the rate of postoperative otorrhea was greater than 92% or if the cost of otorrhea treatment exceeded $4477.36. The cheapest antibiotic/steroid combination, ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone otic ($72.25) was cost-effective ( $\mathrm{ARR}$ 10%). Using a conservative initial otorrhea rate (14%) and weighted cost of treatment ($683.39), the most expensive cost-effective prophylactic intervention possible was $95.67.

Conclusion: Prophylaxis against posttympanostomy otorrhea can be cost-effective. Physicians should consider the cost of prophylaxis at their institution as well as the patient's postoperative risk of otorrhea when making treatment decisions.

Objective: To identify the impact of race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status (SES) on the rate of tympanostomy tube placement.

Study design: Retrospective medical review and population-level analyses.

Setting: Tertiary referral center.

Methods: Demographic and population-level characteristics (age, gender, race, insurance status, and ZIP code) compared to the regional, health system, and otolaryngology clinic demographics.

Results: Among 38,461 children diagnosed with otitis media (OM) 61.4% were white, 27.4% were black, 32.7% had private insurance, and 18.2% were Hispanic. Among patients seen in the pediatric ear, nose, and throat (ENT) clinics, 70.0% were white, 20.0% were black, 46.6% had private insurance, and 14.9% were Hispanic. Further disparity was noted among those receiving tympanostomy tubes: 75.6% white, 15.6% black, 61.9% private insurance, and 11.7% Hispanic. Higher rates of tube placement were noted for those of white race [odds ratio, OR: 1.96, (95% confidence interval, CI: 1.85-2.04), <.001] and non-Hispanic ethnicity [OR: 1.67, (95% CI: 1.56-1.75), <.001]. Geographically, rates of tube placement were significantly lower in areas with higher deprivation indices, areas with lower proportions of white residents, and areas with the lowest median incomes. These markers correlate strongly with black race and Hispanic ethnicity. Lower rates of tube placement were also seen in majority white locales with higher deprivation indices and lower median incomes.

Conclusion: Rates of access to pediatric ENT clinics, and of tube placement, are significantly lower for those of Hispanic ethnicity and black race than for non-Hispanic white children. Higher rates of tube placement were noted among white children and those with private insurance. Lower rates of tube placement were seen in areas of lower SES regardless of racial demographics.

Objective: Pediatric tracheostomy is associated with high morbidity and mortality, yet clinician knowledge and quality of tracheostomy care may vary widely. In situ simulation is effective at detecting and mitigating related latent safety threats, but evaluation via retrospective video review has disadvantages (eg, delayed analysis, and potential data loss). We evaluated whether a novel mobile application is accurate and reliable for assessment of in situ tracheostomy emergency simulations.

Methods: A novel mobile application was developed for assessment of tracheostomy emergency in situ simulation team performance. After 1.25 hours of training, 6 raters scored 10 tracheostomy emergency simulation videos for the occurrence and timing of 12 critical steps. To assess accuracy, rater scores were compared to a reference standard to determine agreement for occurrence or absence of critical steps and a timestamp within ±5 seconds. Interrater reliability was determined through Cohen's and Fleiss' kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient.

Results: Raters had 86.0% agreement with the reference standard when considering step occurrence and timing, and 92.8% agreement when considering only occurrence. The average timestamp difference from the reference standard was 1.3 ± 18.5 seconds. Overall interrater reliability was almost perfect for both step occurrence (Fleiss' kappa of 0.81) and timing of step (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.99).

Discussion: Using our novel mobile application, raters with minimal training accurately and reliably assessed videos of tracheostomy emergency simulations and identified areas for future refinement.

Implications for practice: With refinements, this innovative mobile application is an effective tool for real-time data capture of time-critical steps in in situ tracheostomy emergency simulations.