首页 > 最新文献

OTO Open最新文献

英文 中文
Efficacy of Rectal Versus Oral Chloral Hydrate in Pediatric Auditory Brainstem Response: Randomized Controlled Trial. 直肠与口服水合氯醛对小儿听性脑干反应的疗效:随机对照试验
IF 1.8 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-29 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1002/oto2.70023
Chutaporn Siripermpool, Nalinee Pattrakornkul, Thanitda Thongsattra, Narit Jianbunjongkit

Objective: To compare sedation success rates between rectal (RCH) and oral chloral hydrate (OCH) administration in children undergoing auditory brainstem response (ABR) testing and assess the incidence of adverse effects.

Study design: Randomized controlled trial, performed between May 2023 and August 2023.

Setting: Ear, Nose, and Throat Outpatient Department at tertiary care hospital.

Methods: Pediatric patients aged 1 to 5 years, who were indicated for ABR testing were enrolled and randomly divided into 2 groups. The control group received 10% wt/vol chloral hydrate orally at a dose of 50 mg/kg, while the other group received the same dose through rectal administration. Onset of sedation, duration of sedation, recovery time, vital signs, and adverse effects were recorded and analyzed to assess sedative effectiveness and safety.

Results: Eighty-eight children were randomly assigned to RCH or OCH administration groups, the sedation success rates of RCH and OCH groups were 84.09% and 90.91%, respectively (P = .33). Adverse effects were detected in 11 children (12.5%), with a vomiting rate of 20.45% in the oral group versus 0% in the rectal group (P = .002). The diarrhea rate was 4.55% in the rectal group versus 0% in the oral group (P = .16). In either group, no serious adverse effects were documented.

Conclusion: RCH and OCH are both safe and effective for short-term sedation in pediatric patients during ABR testing. Interestingly, RCH administration offers a high success rate without vomiting or major adverse effects. This study established the effectiveness of RCH for sedation in children under specialized supervision.

目的:比较直肠(RCH)和口服水合氯醛(OCH)对接受听性脑干反应(ABR)测试的儿童的镇静成功率,并评估不良反应发生率:比较直肠(RCH)和口服水合氯醛(OCH)对接受听性脑干反应(ABR)测试的儿童的镇静成功率,并评估不良反应的发生率:随机对照试验,2023年5月至2023年8月期间进行:地点:三级医院耳鼻喉科门诊:入组 1 至 5 岁有 ABR 测试指征的儿科患者,随机分为 2 组。对照组口服 10% wt/vol 水合氯醛,剂量为 50 毫克/千克;另一组通过直肠给药,剂量相同。记录并分析镇静开始时间、镇静持续时间、恢复时间、生命体征和不良反应,以评估镇静的有效性和安全性:结果:88名儿童被随机分配到RCH或OCH给药组,RCH组和OCH组的镇静成功率分别为84.09%和90.91%(P = .33)。11名儿童(12.5%)出现了不良反应,其中口服组的呕吐率为20.45%,而直肠组为0%(P = .002)。直肠组的腹泻率为 4.55%,而口服组为 0%(P = .16)。两组均未发现严重不良反应:结论:RCH 和 OCH 均可安全有效地在 ABR 测试期间对儿科患者进行短期镇静。有趣的是,RCH 给药成功率高,且无呕吐或严重不良反应。这项研究证实了在专门监护下使用 RCH 对儿童镇静的有效性。
{"title":"Efficacy of Rectal Versus Oral Chloral Hydrate in Pediatric Auditory Brainstem Response: Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Chutaporn Siripermpool, Nalinee Pattrakornkul, Thanitda Thongsattra, Narit Jianbunjongkit","doi":"10.1002/oto2.70023","DOIUrl":"10.1002/oto2.70023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare sedation success rates between rectal (RCH) and oral chloral hydrate (OCH) administration in children undergoing auditory brainstem response (ABR) testing and assess the incidence of adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Randomized controlled trial, performed between May 2023 and August 2023.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Ear, Nose, and Throat Outpatient Department at tertiary care hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pediatric patients aged 1 to 5 years, who were indicated for ABR testing were enrolled and randomly divided into 2 groups. The control group received 10% wt/vol chloral hydrate orally at a dose of 50 mg/kg, while the other group received the same dose through rectal administration. Onset of sedation, duration of sedation, recovery time, vital signs, and adverse effects were recorded and analyzed to assess sedative effectiveness and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-eight children were randomly assigned to RCH or OCH administration groups, the sedation success rates of RCH and OCH groups were 84.09% and 90.91%, respectively (<i>P</i> = .33). Adverse effects were detected in 11 children (12.5%), with a vomiting rate of 20.45% in the oral group versus 0% in the rectal group (<i>P</i> = .002). The diarrhea rate was 4.55% in the rectal group versus 0% in the oral group (<i>P</i> = .16). In either group, no serious adverse effects were documented.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RCH and OCH are both safe and effective for short-term sedation in pediatric patients during ABR testing. Interestingly, RCH administration offers a high success rate without vomiting or major adverse effects. This study established the effectiveness of RCH for sedation in children under specialized supervision.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"8 4","pages":"e70023"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11439134/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142351430","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Supraglottic Lymphatic Malformation Managed With Transoral Microelectrode Surgery (TOMES). 经口微电极手术(TOMES)治疗声门上淋巴畸形
IF 1.8 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-29 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1002/oto2.70020
Rosa Hernández, Altea Esteve, Carmen Fernández, Enrique Zapater
{"title":"Supraglottic Lymphatic Malformation Managed With Transoral Microelectrode Surgery (TOMES).","authors":"Rosa Hernández, Altea Esteve, Carmen Fernández, Enrique Zapater","doi":"10.1002/oto2.70020","DOIUrl":"10.1002/oto2.70020","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"8 4","pages":"e70020"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11439146/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142351431","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development of an Automated Triage System for Longstanding Dizzy Patients Using Artificial Intelligence. 利用人工智能开发长期头晕患者自动分诊系统。
IF 1.8 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-27 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1002/oto2.70006
Santiago Romero-Brufau, Robert J Macielak, Jeffrey P Staab, Scott D Z Eggers, Colin L W Driscoll, Neil T Shepard, Douglas J Totten, Sabrina M Albertson, Kalyan S Pasupathy, Devin L McCaslin

Objective: To report the first steps of a project to automate and optimize scheduling of multidisciplinary consultations for patients with longstanding dizziness utilizing artificial intelligence.

Study design: Retrospective case review.

Setting: Quaternary referral center.

Methods: A previsit self-report questionnaire was developed to query patients about their complaints of longstanding dizziness. We convened an expert panel of clinicians to review diagnostic outcomes for 98 patients and used a consensus approach to retrospectively determine what would have been the ideal appointments based on the patient's final diagnoses. These results were then compared retrospectively to the actual patient schedules. From these data, a machine learning algorithm was trained and validated to automate the triage process.

Results: Compared with the ideal itineraries determined retrospectively with our expert panel, visits scheduled by the triage clinicians showed a mean concordance of 70%, and our machine learning algorithm triage showed a mean concordance of 79%.

Conclusion: Manual triage by clinicians for dizzy patients is a time-consuming and costly process. The formulated first-generation automated triage algorithm achieved similar results to clinicians when triaging dizzy patients using data obtained directly from an online previsit questionnaire.

目的:报告利用人工智能对长期眩晕患者的多学科会诊进行自动化和优化调度项目的第一步:报告利用人工智能对长期头晕患者的多学科会诊进行自动化和优化调度的项目的第一步:研究设计:回顾性病例回顾:研究设计:回顾性病例回顾:我们开发了一份就诊前自我报告问卷,以询问患者对长期头晕的主诉。我们召集了一个由临床医生组成的专家小组,对 98 名患者的诊断结果进行回顾性分析,并根据患者的最终诊断结果,采用协商一致的方法回顾性地确定理想的诊疗方案。然后将这些结果与患者的实际日程安排进行回顾性比较。根据这些数据,对机器学习算法进行了训练和验证,以实现分诊过程的自动化:结果:与我们的专家小组回顾性确定的理想行程相比,分诊临床医生安排的就诊时间平均吻合度为 70%,而我们的机器学习算法分诊平均吻合度为 79%:结论:临床医生对头晕患者进行人工分诊既费时又费钱。制定的第一代自动分流算法在使用直接从在线就诊前调查问卷中获取的数据对头晕患者进行分流时,取得了与临床医生相似的结果。
{"title":"Development of an Automated Triage System for Longstanding Dizzy Patients Using Artificial Intelligence.","authors":"Santiago Romero-Brufau, Robert J Macielak, Jeffrey P Staab, Scott D Z Eggers, Colin L W Driscoll, Neil T Shepard, Douglas J Totten, Sabrina M Albertson, Kalyan S Pasupathy, Devin L McCaslin","doi":"10.1002/oto2.70006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/oto2.70006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To report the first steps of a project to automate and optimize scheduling of multidisciplinary consultations for patients with longstanding dizziness utilizing artificial intelligence.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective case review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Quaternary referral center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A previsit self-report questionnaire was developed to query patients about their complaints of longstanding dizziness. We convened an expert panel of clinicians to review diagnostic outcomes for 98 patients and used a consensus approach to retrospectively determine what would have been the ideal appointments based on the patient's final diagnoses. These results were then compared retrospectively to the actual patient schedules. From these data, a machine learning algorithm was trained and validated to automate the triage process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the ideal itineraries determined retrospectively with our expert panel, visits scheduled by the triage clinicians showed a mean concordance of 70%, and our machine learning algorithm triage showed a mean concordance of 79%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Manual triage by clinicians for dizzy patients is a time-consuming and costly process. The formulated first-generation automated triage algorithm achieved similar results to clinicians when triaging dizzy patients using data obtained directly from an online previsit questionnaire.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"8 3","pages":"e70006"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11427795/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142351428","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
ChatGPT Generated Otorhinolaryngology Multiple-Choice Questions: Quality, Psychometric Properties, and Suitability for Assessments. ChatGPT 生成的耳鼻喉科选择题:质量、心理测量特性和评估适用性。
IF 1.8 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-26 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1002/oto2.70018
Cecilia Lotto, Sean C Sheppard, Wilma Anschuetz, Daniel Stricker, Giulia Molinari, Sören Huwendiek, Lukas Anschuetz

Objective: To explore Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer's (ChatGPT's) capability to create multiple-choice questions about otorhinolaryngology (ORL).

Study design: Experimental question generation and exam simulation.

Setting: Tertiary academic center.

Methods: ChatGPT 3.5 was prompted: "Can you please create a challenging 20-question multiple-choice questionnaire about clinical cases in otolaryngology, offering five answer options?." The generated questionnaire was sent to medical students, residents, and consultants. Questions were investigated regarding quality criteria. Answers were anonymized and the resulting data was analyzed in terms of difficulty and internal consistency.

Results: ChatGPT 3.5 generated 20 exam questions of which 1 question was considered off-topic, 3 questions had a false answer, and 3 questions had multiple correct answers. Subspecialty theme repartition was as follows: 5 questions were on otology, 5 about rhinology, and 10 questions addressed head and neck. The qualities of focus and relevance were good while the vignette and distractor qualities were low. The level of difficulty was suitable for undergraduate medical students (n = 24), but too easy for residents (n = 30) or consultants (n = 10) in ORL. Cronbach's α was highest (.69) with 15 selected questions using students' results.

Conclusion: ChatGPT 3.5 is able to generate grammatically correct simple ORL multiple choice questions for a medical student level. However, the overall quality of the questions was average, needing thorough review and revision by a medical expert to ensure suitability in future exams.

研究目的探索聊天生成预训练转换器(ChatGPT)创建耳鼻喉科(ORL)选择题的能力:研究设计:实验性问题生成和考试模拟:研究设计:实验性问题生成和考试模拟:提示:ChatGPT 3.5:方法: ChatGPT 3.5提示:"能否请你制作一份具有挑战性的20道关于耳鼻喉科临床病例的选择题,提供五个答案选项?"。"生成的问卷被发送给医学生、住院医师和顾问。对问题的质量标准进行了调查。对答案进行了匿名处理,并从难度和内部一致性的角度对所得数据进行了分析:结果:ChatGPT 3.5 生成了 20 道考试题,其中 1 道题被视为偏题,3 道题有错误答案,3 道题有多个正确答案。亚专业主题的重新分配如下:耳科 5 道题,鼻科 5 道题,头颈部 10 道题。试题的重点和相关性较好,而小题和分散注意力题的质量较低。该问卷的难度适合医学本科生(24 人),但对于耳鼻喉科住院医师(30 人)或顾问(10 人)来说则过于简单。在使用学生成绩选出的 15 个问题中,Cronbach's α 最高(.69):结论:ChatGPT 3.5 能够生成语法正确的简单 ORL 选择题,适合医学生水平。结论:ChatGPT 3.5 能够生成语法正确、适合医学生水平的简单 ORL 选择题,但试题的整体质量一般,需要医学专家进行彻底审查和修订,以确保适合未来的考试。
{"title":"ChatGPT Generated Otorhinolaryngology Multiple-Choice Questions: Quality, Psychometric Properties, and Suitability for Assessments.","authors":"Cecilia Lotto, Sean C Sheppard, Wilma Anschuetz, Daniel Stricker, Giulia Molinari, Sören Huwendiek, Lukas Anschuetz","doi":"10.1002/oto2.70018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/oto2.70018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer's (ChatGPT's) capability to create multiple-choice questions about otorhinolaryngology (ORL).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Experimental question generation and exam simulation.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary academic center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ChatGPT 3.5 was prompted: \"Can you please create a challenging 20-question multiple-choice questionnaire about clinical cases in otolaryngology, offering five answer options?.\" The generated questionnaire was sent to medical students, residents, and consultants. Questions were investigated regarding quality criteria. Answers were anonymized and the resulting data was analyzed in terms of difficulty and internal consistency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ChatGPT 3.5 generated 20 exam questions of which 1 question was considered off-topic, 3 questions had a false answer, and 3 questions had multiple correct answers. Subspecialty theme repartition was as follows: 5 questions were on otology, 5 about rhinology, and 10 questions addressed head and neck. The qualities of focus and relevance were good while the vignette and distractor qualities were low. The level of difficulty was suitable for undergraduate medical students (n = 24), but too easy for residents (n = 30) or consultants (n = 10) in ORL. Cronbach's <i>α</i> was highest (.69) with 15 selected questions using students' results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ChatGPT 3.5 is able to generate grammatically correct simple ORL multiple choice questions for a medical student level. However, the overall quality of the questions was average, needing thorough review and revision by a medical expert to ensure suitability in future exams.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"8 3","pages":"e70018"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11424880/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142351427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Novel Endoscopic Anterior Cricoid Rib Grafting: A Feasibility Study in An Animal Model. 新型内窥镜环状肋骨前部移植术:动物模型可行性研究
IF 1.8 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-23 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1002/oto2.70012
Bshair Aldriweesh, Nasser Almutairi, Waleed Alshareef, Abdullah Sindi, Ahmed Alammar

Objective: The objective of our study was to document the feasibility of a novel endoscopic anterior cricoid split and rib grafting technique in a goat airway model.

Study design: Feasibility pilot animal study.

Setting: Animal surgical laboratory at a tertiary hospital and research center.

Methods: Three Ardhi goats were utilized. After harvesting and shaping the rib graft, 2 sutures were inserted transversely into the graft. An endoscopic midline anterior cricoid split was performed and extended down through the first tracheal ring, followed by a balloon dilation of the site. Next, the 2 lower and upper graft suture ends were sequentially passed as endo-extra laryngeal sutures and tied on the anterior neck skin. Laryngeal stent was utilized in 1 goat following graft placement.

Results: The surgery was successful in all included animals and bronchoscopy performed 7 days after surgery, revealed that the anterior graft was in good position. One goat developed surgical site infection leading to partial graft resorption.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated the feasibility of this novel procedure which is potentially useful for patients who are candidates for a single-stage reconstruction. Future studies should investigate the safety and validity of this technique in a model with subglottic stenosis.

Level of evidence: NA.

研究目的我们的研究目的是在山羊气道模型中记录新型内窥镜前环状切口和肋骨移植技术的可行性:研究设计:可行性试验动物研究:研究设计:试验性动物可行性研究:方法:使用三只阿迪山羊。采集肋骨移植物并塑形后,将 2 根缝线横向插入移植物。在内窥镜下进行中线前环状切口,并向下延伸至第一气管环,然后对该部位进行球囊扩张。然后,将下部和上部移植物的两个缝合端依次作为喉内-喉外缝合线穿过,并在颈前皮肤上打结。1 只山羊在放置移植物后使用了喉支架:所有动物的手术都很成功,术后 7 天进行的支气管镜检查显示,前部移植物位置良好。一只山羊出现了手术部位感染,导致部分移植物吸收:这项研究证明了这种新型手术的可行性,它可能适用于适合单阶段重建的患者。未来的研究应在声门下狭窄模型中调查该技术的安全性和有效性:不适用。
{"title":"A Novel Endoscopic Anterior Cricoid Rib Grafting: A Feasibility Study in An Animal Model.","authors":"Bshair Aldriweesh, Nasser Almutairi, Waleed Alshareef, Abdullah Sindi, Ahmed Alammar","doi":"10.1002/oto2.70012","DOIUrl":"10.1002/oto2.70012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of our study was to document the feasibility of a novel endoscopic anterior cricoid split and rib grafting technique in a goat airway model.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Feasibility pilot animal study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Animal surgical laboratory at a tertiary hospital and research center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three Ardhi goats were utilized. After harvesting and shaping the rib graft, 2 sutures were inserted transversely into the graft. An endoscopic midline anterior cricoid split was performed and extended down through the first tracheal ring, followed by a balloon dilation of the site. Next, the 2 lower and upper graft suture ends were sequentially passed as endo-extra laryngeal sutures and tied on the anterior neck skin. Laryngeal stent was utilized in 1 goat following graft placement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The surgery was successful in all included animals and bronchoscopy performed 7 days after surgery, revealed that the anterior graft was in good position. One goat developed surgical site infection leading to partial graft resorption.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated the feasibility of this novel procedure which is potentially useful for patients who are candidates for a single-stage reconstruction. Future studies should investigate the safety and validity of this technique in a model with subglottic stenosis.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>NA.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"8 3","pages":"e70012"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418163/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142308284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Educational Gaps in Dermatologic Diagnoses Among Otolaryngology Residents. 耳鼻喉科住院医生在皮肤病诊断方面的教育差距。
IF 1.8 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-23 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1002/oto2.70017
Sasan Darain Noveir, Wasiq Nadeem, Carol E Cheng, Matthew K Lee

Otolaryngologists frequently serve as the first touchpoint for patients presenting with dermatologic conditions of the head and neck. This study aims to identify and quantify gaps in dermatologic training among otolaryngology residents, and to assess their diagnostic accuracy in comparison to dermatology residents. It comprised 14 multiple-choice questions focused on common dermatologic diagnoses related to the head and neck. Sixty-one dermatology and 36 otolaryngology residents participated in the study. Dermatology residents significantly outperformed otolaryngology residents, with average scores of 90% (SD = 8) compared to 71% (SD = 10) (P < .001). The observed effect size (Cohen's d = 2.010) significantly exceeded the expected effect size (0.603). Otolaryngology residents performed significantly lower on 7 out of the 14 questions. Analysis based on postgraduate year level showed no significant differences in scores within dermatology (P = .119) or otolaryngology (P = .402) residency programs.

耳鼻喉科医生经常是头颈部皮肤病患者的第一接触点。本研究旨在确定和量化耳鼻喉科住院医师在皮肤病学培训方面的差距,并评估他们与皮肤科住院医师相比的诊断准确性。研究包括 14 道选择题,重点是与头颈部相关的常见皮肤病诊断。61名皮肤科和36名耳鼻喉科住院医师参与了研究。皮肤科住院医师的表现明显优于耳鼻喉科住院医师,平均得分率为 90% (SD = 8),而耳鼻喉科住院医师的平均得分率为 71% (SD = 10)(P d = 2.010),明显超过了预期的效应大小(0.603)。在 14 个问题中,耳鼻喉科住院医师在 7 个问题上的得分明显较低。根据研究生年级进行的分析表明,在皮肤科(P = .119)或耳鼻喉科(P = .402)住院医师培训项目中,得分没有明显差异。
{"title":"Educational Gaps in Dermatologic Diagnoses Among Otolaryngology Residents.","authors":"Sasan Darain Noveir, Wasiq Nadeem, Carol E Cheng, Matthew K Lee","doi":"10.1002/oto2.70017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/oto2.70017","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Otolaryngologists frequently serve as the first touchpoint for patients presenting with dermatologic conditions of the head and neck. This study aims to identify and quantify gaps in dermatologic training among otolaryngology residents, and to assess their diagnostic accuracy in comparison to dermatology residents. It comprised 14 multiple-choice questions focused on common dermatologic diagnoses related to the head and neck. Sixty-one dermatology and 36 otolaryngology residents participated in the study. Dermatology residents significantly outperformed otolaryngology residents, with average scores of 90% (SD = 8) compared to 71% (SD = 10) (<i>P</i> < .001). The observed effect size (Cohen's <i>d</i> = 2.010) significantly exceeded the expected effect size (0.603). Otolaryngology residents performed significantly lower on 7 out of the 14 questions. Analysis based on postgraduate year level showed no significant differences in scores within dermatology (<i>P</i> = .119) or otolaryngology (<i>P</i> = .402) residency programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"8 3","pages":"e70017"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11420511/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142351429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Real-World Evaluation of Asthma Severity Following Endoscopic Sinus Surgery in Chronic Rhinosinusitis Patients. 对慢性鼻窦炎患者进行内窥镜鼻窦手术后哮喘严重程度的真实世界评估
IF 1.8 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-18 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1002/oto2.70013
Anyull D B Caballero, Estephania Candelo, Karol Avila-Castano, Alaa Alhalabi, Angela M Donaldson

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) on asthma severity up to 12 months after surgical intervention.

Study design: Retrospective cohort.

Setting: Tertiary care center.

Methods: Patients with a history of asthma and Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) who underwent ESS between 2013 and 2023 were included. Asthma severity was assessed according to current Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines, classifying patients into mild, moderate, and severe based on medication requirements. Asthma severity was evaluated up to 3 months prior to ESS and 1-year post-ESS. Patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) were excluded. Statistical analysis was performed using McNemar test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test to assess differences in asthma severity, medication doses, and number of medications.

Results: Sixty-five patients were included, of which 44 (67.7%) had CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and 21 (32.3%) had CRS without nasal polyps (CRSsNP). No significant differences were found in asthma severity pre- and post-ESS (P = .175). Similarly, no differences were found in ICS doses (P = .999), total number of prescribed medications (P = .157) or presence of exacerbations before and after ESS (P = .078). However, a significant increase in time from last rescue inhaler use was noted after ESS, increasing from a median of 6.71 to 23.1 weeks (P = .004).

Conclusion: This study is the first to assess the impact of ESS on asthma severity in a real-world setting. Our findings suggest that ESS does not impact asthma severity classification. However, it might provide relief of asthma symptoms in the early postoperative period.

研究目的本研究旨在评估内窥镜鼻窦手术(ESS)对手术干预后12个月内哮喘严重程度的影响:研究设计:回顾性队列:地点:三级医疗中心:方法:纳入2013年至2023年期间接受ESS手术的有哮喘和慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)病史的患者。根据现行的全球哮喘倡议(GINA)指南对哮喘严重程度进行评估,并根据用药要求将患者分为轻度、中度和重度。ESS前3个月和ESS后1年对哮喘严重程度进行了评估。患有阿司匹林加重呼吸道疾病(AERD)的患者被排除在外。采用 McNemar 检验和 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验进行统计分析,以评估哮喘严重程度、药物剂量和药物数量的差异:结果:共纳入 65 名患者,其中 44 人(67.7%)患有伴有鼻息肉的 CRS(CRSwNP),21 人(32.3%)患有不伴有鼻息肉的 CRS(CRSsNP)。ESS前后的哮喘严重程度无明显差异(P = .175)。同样,ESS 前后的 ICS 剂量(P = .999)、处方药物总数(P = .157)或病情加重情况(P = .078)也无差异。然而,ESS 后距最后一次使用救援吸入器的时间明显增加,从中位数 6.71 周增加到 23.1 周(P = .004):本研究首次评估了ESS在真实世界环境中对哮喘严重程度的影响。我们的研究结果表明,ESS 不会影响哮喘严重程度的分类。不过,它可以在术后早期缓解哮喘症状。
{"title":"Real-World Evaluation of Asthma Severity Following Endoscopic Sinus Surgery in Chronic Rhinosinusitis Patients.","authors":"Anyull D B Caballero, Estephania Candelo, Karol Avila-Castano, Alaa Alhalabi, Angela M Donaldson","doi":"10.1002/oto2.70013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/oto2.70013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) on asthma severity up to 12 months after surgical intervention.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary care center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with a history of asthma and Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) who underwent ESS between 2013 and 2023 were included. Asthma severity was assessed according to current Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines, classifying patients into mild, moderate, and severe based on medication requirements. Asthma severity was evaluated up to 3 months prior to ESS and 1-year post-ESS. Patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) were excluded. Statistical analysis was performed using McNemar test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test to assess differences in asthma severity, medication doses, and number of medications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-five patients were included, of which 44 (67.7%) had CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and 21 (32.3%) had CRS without nasal polyps (CRSsNP). No significant differences were found in asthma severity pre- and post-ESS (<i>P</i> = .175). Similarly, no differences were found in ICS doses (<i>P</i> = .999), total number of prescribed medications (<i>P</i> = .157) or presence of exacerbations before and after ESS (<i>P</i> = .078). However, a significant increase in time from last rescue inhaler use was noted after ESS, increasing from a median of 6.71 to 23.1 weeks (<i>P</i> = .004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study is the first to assess the impact of ESS on asthma severity in a real-world setting. Our findings suggest that ESS does not impact asthma severity classification. However, it might provide relief of asthma symptoms in the early postoperative period.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"8 3","pages":"e70013"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11409052/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142292853","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Demographics of Adults With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Who Undergo Nasal Surgery. 接受鼻腔手术的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停成人的人口统计学特征。
IF 1.8 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-17 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1002/oto2.70005
Swapnil Shah, Jeanne A Darbinian, Samuel A Collazo, Dang Khoa Nguyen, Megan L Durr

Objective: To assess the demographic characteristics between adult obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients who did and did not undergo nasal surgery (NS).

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Kaiser Permanente Northern California clinical database.

Methods: Retrospective study of adult patients with ≥1 OSA diagnoses linked to clinical encounters from 2009 to 2016. Qualifying NS procedures performed on or after cohort entry through 2017 were ascertained. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared; multivariable logistic regression examined associations of these characteristics with undergoing NS.

Results: A total of 174,821 patients had an OSA diagnosis. Among these, 3518 (2.0%) underwent NS, including septoplasty (61.9%), sinus-related (12.9%), turbinate (14.2%), and rhinoplasty (11.1%) procedures. Compared to the nonsurgery group, NS patients were more likely to be male (75.5% vs 62.1%), younger (48.2 ± 13.0 vs 54.7 ± 14.1), have lower body mass index (31.8 ± 6.4 vs 34.3 ± 8.1), and no comorbid conditions (63.1% vs 53.5%), P < .001. After adjusting for sex, age, body mass index (BMI), neighborhood deprivation, and comorbidities, black and Asian/Pacific Islander adults with OSA had 42% and 46% decreased odds of undergoing NS compared with non-Hispanic white patients (odds ratio, OR [95% confidence interval, CI]: 0.58 [0.50-0.67] and 0.54 [0.49-0.61]), while Hispanic patients had similar odds (OR [95% CI]: 1.02 [0.93-1.12]). Patients living in neighborhoods of highest deprivation had 18% lower odds of undergoing NS, compared with patients from neighborhoods corresponding to areas of lowest deprivation (adjusted odds ratio [95% CI]: 0.82 [0.75-0.91]).

Conclusion: These findings suggest that younger age, male sex, lower BMI, and higher SES may be associated with a higher likelihood of undergoing NS in OSA patients.

研究目的评估接受和未接受鼻腔手术(NS)的成人阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者的人口统计学特征:研究设计:回顾性队列研究:研究设计:回顾性队列研究:回顾性研究:2009 年至 2016 年期间与临床会诊相关联的 OSA 诊断次数≥1 次的成年患者。确定了在进入队列时或之后至 2017 年进行的符合条件的 NS 程序。比较了人口统计学特征和临床特征;多变量逻辑回归检验了这些特征与接受 NS 的关系:共有 174821 名患者确诊为 OSA。其中,3518 人(2.0%)接受了 NS 治疗,包括鼻中隔成形术(61.9%)、鼻窦相关手术(12.9%)、鼻甲成形术(14.2%)和鼻成形术(11.1%)。与非手术组相比,NS 患者更可能是男性(75.5% 对 62.1%)、更年轻(48.2 ± 13.0 对 54.7 ± 14.1)、体重指数更低(31.8 ± 6.4 对 34.3 ± 8.1)、无合并症(63.1% 对 53.5%),P 结论:这些研究结果表明,年龄较小、性别为男性、体重指数较低和社会经济地位较高的 OSA 患者接受 NS 治疗的可能性较高。
{"title":"Demographics of Adults With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Who Undergo Nasal Surgery.","authors":"Swapnil Shah, Jeanne A Darbinian, Samuel A Collazo, Dang Khoa Nguyen, Megan L Durr","doi":"10.1002/oto2.70005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/oto2.70005","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the demographic characteristics between adult obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients who did and did not undergo nasal surgery (NS).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Kaiser Permanente Northern California clinical database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective study of adult patients with ≥1 OSA diagnoses linked to clinical encounters from 2009 to 2016. Qualifying NS procedures performed on or after cohort entry through 2017 were ascertained. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared; multivariable logistic regression examined associations of these characteristics with undergoing NS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 174,821 patients had an OSA diagnosis. Among these, 3518 (2.0%) underwent NS, including septoplasty (61.9%), sinus-related (12.9%), turbinate (14.2%), and rhinoplasty (11.1%) procedures. Compared to the nonsurgery group, NS patients were more likely to be male (75.5% vs 62.1%), younger (48.2 ± 13.0 vs 54.7 ± 14.1), have lower body mass index (31.8 ± 6.4 vs 34.3 ± 8.1), and no comorbid conditions (63.1% vs 53.5%), <i>P</i> < .001. After adjusting for sex, age, body mass index (BMI), neighborhood deprivation, and comorbidities, black and Asian/Pacific Islander adults with OSA had 42% and 46% decreased odds of undergoing NS compared with non-Hispanic white patients (odds ratio, OR [95% confidence interval, CI]: 0.58 [0.50-0.67] and 0.54 [0.49-0.61]), while Hispanic patients had similar odds (OR [95% CI]: 1.02 [0.93-1.12]). Patients living in neighborhoods of highest deprivation had 18% lower odds of undergoing NS, compared with patients from neighborhoods corresponding to areas of lowest deprivation (adjusted odds ratio [95% CI]: 0.82 [0.75-0.91]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that younger age, male sex, lower BMI, and higher SES may be associated with a higher likelihood of undergoing NS in OSA patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"8 3","pages":"e70005"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11405934/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142292851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluating ChatGPT as a Patient Education Tool for COVID-19-Induced Olfactory Dysfunction. 评估将 ChatGPT 作为 COVID-19 引起的嗅觉功能障碍的患者教育工具。
IF 1.8 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-15 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1002/oto2.70011
Elliott M Sina, Daniel J Campbell, Alexander Duffy, Shreya Mandloi, Peter Benedict, Douglas Farquhar, Aykut Unsal, Gurston Nyquist

Objective: While most patients with COVID-19-induced olfactory dysfunction (OD) recover spontaneously, those with persistent OD face significant physical and psychological sequelae. ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence chatbot, has grown as a tool for patient education. This study seeks to evaluate the quality of ChatGPT-generated responses for COVID-19 OD.

Study design: Quantitative observational study.

Setting: Publicly available online website.

Methods: ChatGPT (GPT-4) was queried 4 times with 30 identical questions. Prior to questioning, Chat-GPT was "prompted" to respond (1) to a patient, (2) to an eighth grader, (3) with references, and (4) no prompt. Answer accuracy was independently scored by 4 rhinologists using the Global Quality Score (GCS, range: 1-5). Proportions of responses at incremental score thresholds were compared using χ 2 analysis. Flesch-Kincaid grade level was calculated for each answer. Relationship between prompt type and grade level was assessed via analysis of variance.

Results: Across all graded responses (n = 480), 364 responses (75.8%) were "at least good" (GCS ≥ 4). Proportions of responses that were "at least good" (P < .0001) or "excellent" (GCS = 5) (P < .0001) differed by prompt; "at least moderate" (GCS ≥ 3) responses did not (P = .687). Eighth-grade level (14.06 ± 2.3) and patient-friendly (14.33 ± 2.0) responses were significantly lower mean grade level than no prompting (P < .0001).

Conclusion: ChatGPT provides appropriate answers to most questions on COVID-19 OD regardless of prompting. However, prompting influences response quality and grade level. ChatGPT responds at grade levels above accepted recommendations for presenting medical information to patients. Currently, ChatGPT offers significant potential for patient education as an adjunct to the conventional patient-physician relationship.

目的:虽然大多数 COVID-19 引起的嗅觉功能障碍(OD)患者都能自愈,但那些持续存在 OD 的患者却面临着严重的生理和心理后遗症。人工智能聊天机器人 ChatGPT 已发展成为一种患者教育工具。本研究旨在评估 ChatGPT 为 COVID-19 OD 生成的回复质量:研究设计:定量观察研究:研究设计:定量观察研究:对 ChatGPT(GPT-4)进行了 4 次查询,共 30 个相同的问题。在提问之前,Chat-GPT 会被 "提示 "回答:(1) 病人;(2) 八年级学生;(3) 有参考资料;(4) 无提示。回答的准确性由 4 位鼻科专家使用 "全面质量评分"(GCS,范围:1-5)进行独立评分。采用 χ 2 分析法对增量分数阈值的回答比例进行比较。计算每个答案的 Flesch-Kincaid 等级。通过方差分析评估了提示类型与等级之间的关系:在所有分级回答(n = 480)中,364 个回答(75.8%)"至少良好"(GCS ≥ 4)。至少良好 "的回答比例(P P P = .687)。八年级水平(14.06 ± 2.3)和患者友好型(14.33 ± 2.0)回答的平均年级水平明显低于无提示(P 结论:无论提示与否,ChatGPT 都能为 COVID-19 OD 的大多数问题提供适当的答案。但是,提示会影响回答质量和年级。ChatGPT 的回答等级高于向患者提供医疗信息的公认建议等级。目前,ChatGPT 作为传统医患关系的辅助工具,为患者教育提供了巨大的潜力。
{"title":"Evaluating ChatGPT as a Patient Education Tool for COVID-19-Induced Olfactory Dysfunction.","authors":"Elliott M Sina, Daniel J Campbell, Alexander Duffy, Shreya Mandloi, Peter Benedict, Douglas Farquhar, Aykut Unsal, Gurston Nyquist","doi":"10.1002/oto2.70011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/oto2.70011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>While most patients with COVID-19-induced olfactory dysfunction (OD) recover spontaneously, those with persistent OD face significant physical and psychological sequelae. ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence chatbot, has grown as a tool for patient education. This study seeks to evaluate the quality of ChatGPT-generated responses for COVID-19 OD.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Quantitative observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Publicly available online website.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ChatGPT (GPT-4) was queried 4 times with 30 identical questions. Prior to questioning, Chat-GPT was \"prompted\" to respond (1) to a patient, (2) to an eighth grader, (3) with references, and (4) no prompt. Answer accuracy was independently scored by 4 rhinologists using the Global Quality Score (GCS, range: 1-5). Proportions of responses at incremental score thresholds were compared using <i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> analysis. Flesch-Kincaid grade level was calculated for each answer. Relationship between prompt type and grade level was assessed via analysis of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all graded responses (n = 480), 364 responses (75.8%) were \"at least good\" (GCS ≥ 4). Proportions of responses that were \"at least good\" (<i>P</i> < .0001) or \"excellent\" (GCS = 5) (<i>P</i> < .0001) differed by prompt; \"at least moderate\" (GCS ≥ 3) responses did not (<i>P</i> = .687). Eighth-grade level (14.06 ± 2.3) and patient-friendly (14.33 ± 2.0) responses were significantly lower mean grade level than no prompting (<i>P</i> < .0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ChatGPT provides appropriate answers to most questions on COVID-19 OD regardless of prompting. However, prompting influences response quality and grade level. ChatGPT responds at grade levels above accepted recommendations for presenting medical information to patients. Currently, ChatGPT offers significant potential for patient education as an adjunct to the conventional patient-physician relationship.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"8 3","pages":"e70011"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11403001/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142292852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pediatric Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Rates Within a Tertiary Military Medical Center. 一家三级军事医疗中心的儿科人类乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种率。
IF 1.8 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-03 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1002/oto2.149
Candace A Flagg, Benjamin K Walters, Sarah N Bowe

Objective: To determine our center's human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rate and identify common negative perceptions surrounding the vaccine to guide more effective HPV vaccine counseling.

Methods: We reviewed immunization records for patients ages 11 to 26 that receive care at Brooke Army Medical Center. Vaccine uptake rate was determined by dividing the number of patients who had completed the HPV vaccine series by the total target population. From October 2021 to December 2022, a clinic survey was distributed to parents (for patients ages 11-17) or patients themselves (ages 18-26) during otolaryngology visits to poll vaccination status and attitudes toward the vaccine.

Results: A total of 3038 patients ages 11 to 26 are enrolled for primary care at Brooke Army Medical Center, but only 962 (32%) are vaccine complete. Thirty-five surveys were collected during the study period. Twenty-two surveys (63%) from patients/parents reported they/their child had received the HPV vaccine. Concerns about vaccine safety, sexual behaviors, lack of immunization requirement for school, and difficulty getting scheduled were the most common reasons patients were unvaccinated.

Discussion: Counseling patients on the HPV vaccine can be difficult given the common misconceptions surrounding vaccination, but understanding these attitudes will allow otolaryngologists to educate patients more effectively. This matters since patients more knowledgeable about HPV are more likely to receive the vaccine.

Implications for practice: Our clinic has developed new strategies in partnership with primary care departments to facilitate more streamlined vaccination for eligible patients, and moving forward we plan to trend HPV vaccination rates over time to determine our impact on uptake.

目的确定本中心的人类乳头瘤病毒 (HPV) 疫苗接种率,并识别围绕该疫苗的常见负面看法,以指导更有效的 HPV 疫苗咨询:我们查阅了在布鲁克陆军医疗中心接受治疗的 11 至 26 岁患者的免疫接种记录。疫苗接种率是用完成 HPV 疫苗接种的患者人数除以目标人群总数得出的。从 2021 年 10 月到 2022 年 12 月,在耳鼻喉科就诊期间向家长(11-17 岁患者)或患者本人(18-26 岁)发放了一份诊所调查表,以调查疫苗接种情况和对疫苗的态度:布鲁克陆军医疗中心(Brooke Army Medical Center)共有 3038 名 11 至 26 岁的患者接受了初级保健,但只有 962 人(32%)完成了疫苗接种。研究期间共收集了 35 份调查问卷。有 22 份(63%)来自患者/家长的调查报告称他们/他们的孩子已经接种了 HPV 疫苗。对疫苗安全性的担忧、性行为、学校没有免疫要求以及难以安排接种时间是患者未接种疫苗的最常见原因:讨论:鉴于围绕疫苗接种的常见误解,为患者提供有关 HPV 疫苗的咨询可能会很困难,但了解这些态度将使耳鼻喉科医生能够更有效地教育患者。这一点很重要,因为对 HPV 有更多了解的患者更有可能接种疫苗:我们诊所已与初级保健部门合作制定了新的策略,以便为符合条件的患者提供更简便的疫苗接种服务,今后我们计划对 HPV 疫苗接种率进行长期跟踪,以确定我们对疫苗接种率的影响。
{"title":"Pediatric Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Rates Within a Tertiary Military Medical Center.","authors":"Candace A Flagg, Benjamin K Walters, Sarah N Bowe","doi":"10.1002/oto2.149","DOIUrl":"10.1002/oto2.149","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine our center's human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rate and identify common negative perceptions surrounding the vaccine to guide more effective HPV vaccine counseling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed immunization records for patients ages 11 to 26 that receive care at Brooke Army Medical Center. Vaccine uptake rate was determined by dividing the number of patients who had completed the HPV vaccine series by the total target population. From October 2021 to December 2022, a clinic survey was distributed to parents (for patients ages 11-17) or patients themselves (ages 18-26) during otolaryngology visits to poll vaccination status and attitudes toward the vaccine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3038 patients ages 11 to 26 are enrolled for primary care at Brooke Army Medical Center, but only 962 (32%) are vaccine complete. Thirty-five surveys were collected during the study period. Twenty-two surveys (63%) from patients/parents reported they/their child had received the HPV vaccine. Concerns about vaccine safety, sexual behaviors, lack of immunization requirement for school, and difficulty getting scheduled were the most common reasons patients were unvaccinated.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Counseling patients on the HPV vaccine can be difficult given the common misconceptions surrounding vaccination, but understanding these attitudes will allow otolaryngologists to educate patients more effectively. This matters since patients more knowledgeable about HPV are more likely to receive the vaccine.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Our clinic has developed new strategies in partnership with primary care departments to facilitate more streamlined vaccination for eligible patients, and moving forward we plan to trend HPV vaccination rates over time to determine our impact on uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"8 3","pages":"e149"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11369486/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142126328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
OTO Open
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1