Patient Related Outcome Measures最新文献

Introduction: Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide. In Diabetics, ASCVD is associated with poor prognosis and a higher case fatality rate compared with the general population. Sub-Saharan Africa is facing an epidemiological transition with ASCVD being prevalent among young adults. To date, over 20 million people have been living with DM in Africa, Tanzania being one of the five countries in the continent reported to have a higher prevalence. This study aimed to identify an individual's 10-year ASCVD absolute risk among a diabetic cohort in Tanzania and define contextual risk enhancing factors.

Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at the Aga Khan hospital, Mwanza, for a period of 8 months. The hospital is a 42-bed district-level hospital in Tanzania. Individuals 10-year risk was calculated based on the ASCVD 2013 risk calculator by ACC/AHA. Pearson's chi-square or Fischer's exact test was used to compare categorical and continuous variables. Multivariable analysis was applied to determine contextual factors for those who had a high 10-year risk of developing ASCVD.

Results: The overall cohort included 573 patients. Majority of the individuals were found to be hypertensive (n = 371, 64.7%) and obese (n = 331, 58%) having a high 10-year absolute risk (n = 343, 60%) of suffering ASCVD. The study identified duration of Diabetes Mellitus (>10 years) (OR 8.15, 95% CI 5.25-14.42), concomitant hypertension (OR 1.82 95% CI 1.06-3.06), Diabetic Dyslipidemia (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.08-1.92) and deranged serum creatinine (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.02-1.03) to be the risk enhancing factors amongst our population.

Conclusion: The study confirms the majority of diabetic individuals in the lake region of Tanzania to have a high 10-year ASCVD risk. The high prevalence of obesity, hypertension and dyslipidemia augments ASCVD risk but provides interventional targets for health-care workers to decrease these alarming projections.

Background: Patients undergoing surgery frequently experience unfavorable anesthetic outcomes. They may have an impact on body systems and result in more serious postoperative morbidities. This study was conducted to determine the incidence of postoperative undesirable anesthetic outcomes among surgical patients at referral hospitals in Amhara region, Ethiopia.

Methods: A total of 412 patients, who underwent surgical procedures between August 1 and October 30 of 2022, were included in this study. The Leiden Perioperative Care Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire's (LPPSq) dimension "discomfort and needs" was used to collect data on the first postoperative day. Data entry and analysis were performed using SPSS version 20. To assess how risk factors affected the outcome variable, logistic regression analysis was utilized. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, a variable with a P-value of less than 0.05 was statistically considered as significant.

Results: The proportion of those who had "at least a little bit" of unfavorable outcomes was calculated to estimate their overall prevalence, and the prevalence of those who had "more than moderate" levels of unfavorable outcomes was determined to appreciate how severe these outcomes were. The percentages of postoperative pain, the most common undesired result, for "at least a little bit" and "more than moderate" were 87.7% and 32.3%, respectively. In this study, postoperative cold was the least prevalent (51.4%) undesirable anesthetic outcome. The remaining undesirable postoperative outcomes were reported less frequently.

Conclusion and recommendation: Undesirable postoperative anesthetic outcomes were still common. The most frequent unfavorable result was postoperative pain. Adequate postoperative patient follow-up and quality service are paramount.

Background: Traumatic brain injury is a major list of health and socioeconomic problems especially in low- and middle-income countries which influences productive age groups. Differences in patient characteristics, socioeconomic status, intensive care unit admission thresholds, health-care systems, and the availability of varying numbers of intensive care unit (ICU) beds among hospitals had shown to be the causes for the variation on the incidence in mortality following traumatic brain injury across different continents. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and predictors of mortality among patients with traumatic brain injury at University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital.

Methods: A retrospective follow-up study was conducted based on chart review and selected patient charts admitted from January, 2017 to January, 2022. Participants in the study were chosen using a simple random sample procedure that was computer generated. Data was entered with epi-data version 4.6 and analyzed using SPSS version 26. Both bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used, and in multivariate logistic regression analysis, P-value <0.05 with 95% CI was considered statistically significant.

Results: The magnitude of mortality was 28.8%. Most of the injuries were caused by assault followed by road traffic accident (RTA). About 30% of the subjects presented with severe head injuries and epidural hematoma (EDH) followed by skull fracture were the most common diagnoses on admission. The independent predictors of mortality were male sex (AOR: 6.12, CI: 1.82, 20.5), severe class injury with Glasco coma scale (GCS <9) (AOR: 5.96, CI: 2.07, 17.12), intraoperative hypoxia episode (AOR: 10.5, CI: 2.6-42.1), hyperthermia (AOR: 25, CI: 5.54, 115.16), lack of pre-hospital care (AOR: 2.64 CI: 1.6-4.2), abnormal appearance on both eyes (AOR: 13.4, CI: 5.1-34.6), in-hospital hypoxia episode and having extra-cranial concomitant injury were positively associated with mortality, while on admission, systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 100-149 (AOR: 0.086, CI: 0.016-0.46) was negatively associated with mortality.

Conclusion: The overall mortality rate was considerably high. As a result, traumatic brain injury management should be focused on modifiable factors that increase patient mortality, such as on-admission hypotension, a lack of pre-hospital care, post-operative complications, an intraoperative hypoxia episode, and hyperthermia.

Purpose: Many patients seeking bariatric surgery experience reduced health-related quality of life (HRQOL). A simple clinical tool, the Patient-Reported Outcomes in Obesity (PROS), was developed to address patients' HRQOL concerns during clinical consultations and facilitate meaningful dialogue. The present study aims to explore its sensitivity to change.

Patients and methods: A prospective study of patients undergoing bariatric surgery was conducted. The patients responded to items on the PROS and the Obesity-related Problems Scale (OP) before surgery and three, 12 and 24 months after surgery. Longitudinal mixed-effects models were applied to estimate the change in PROS and OP scores over time.

Results: Thirty-eight patients were included. A significant change over time was detected for the PROS with the largest effect size at 24 months (effect size -1.34, p ˂ 0.001), while the corresponding effect size for the OP was -1.32 (p ˂ 0.001). In all items of the PROS, the majority of patients responded not bothered at 24 months. The items physical activity, pain, sleep and self-esteem showed the largest change in the percentage of patients reporting not bothered from baseline to 24 months after surgery.

Conclusion: The PROS is sensitive to change over time and may be used as a brief, easy to administer tool to facilitate a conversation about obesity-specific quality of life in clinical consultations.

Background: Surveys of back pain sufferers in the United States, China, Russia, and Germany were performed to better understand self-reported causes of acute nonspecific back pain and acute lower back pain among individuals engaging in sports and their preferred treatments.

Methods: In each country, 1000 participants were surveyed (Step 1) to identify a population of nonspecific acute back pain sufferers, understand pain and treatment characteristics, and generate profiles for individuals with long-lasting (≥7 days) acute lower back pain. Subsequently, 200 participants with acute lower back pain episodes (7-21 days) and sports participation were identified in each country and completed surveys (Step 2) about sociodemographic, pain, treatment characteristics, and causes/triggers of long-lasting acute lower back pain episodes.

Results: In the United States, China, Russia, and Germany, respectively, 59%, 49%, 61%, and 63% of respondents reported ≥1 episode of nonspecific acute back pain in the previous 6 months. Average numbers of monthly nonspecific acute back pain episodes in the United States, Russia, Germany, and China were 2.5, 1.8, 1.3, and 0.8, respectively. Prevalence of acute lower back pain associated with sports/leisure activities ranged from 20% (Russia and Germany) to 46% (China). Onset of long-lasting acute lower back pain was between ages 30 and 33 years, limiting usual activities and reducing walking distance in 60% to 85% of respondents across all countries. Acute lower back pain started post-exercise within the first day for ≥75% of respondents. Most popular nonprescription and prescription treatments for acute lower back pain were creams/gels in Russia, creams/gels and oral painkillers in Germany, oral painkillers in the United States, and hot/cold patches in China.

Conclusion: These results help to better understand acute back pain triggers, features, and treatment preferences among sports participants in different countries. Further research is warranted to develop preventative strategies.

Trial registration: Not applicable.

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide a valid, standardized way of assessing symptoms, adverse events and the subjective benefit of treatment from the patient's perspective. Assessment of PROs is critical in ovarian cancer due to the high morbidity of the disease and its treatments. Several well-validated PRO measures are available to assess PROs in ovarian cancer. Their inclusion in clinical trials can provide evidence on the benefits and harms of new treatments based on patients' experiences to guide improvements in clinical practice and health policy. Aggregate PRO data collected in clinical trials can be used to inform patients about likely treatment impacts and assist them to make informed treatment decisions. In clinical practice, PRO assessments can facilitate monitoring of a patient's symptoms throughout treatment and follow-up to guide their clinical management; in this context, an individual patient's responses can facilitate communication with their treating clinician about troublesome symptoms and their impact on their quality of life. This literature review aimed to provide clinicians and researchers with a better understanding of why and how PROs can be incorporated into ovarian cancer clinical trials and routine clinical practice. We discuss the importance of assessing PROs throughout the ovarian cancer disease and treatment trajectory in both clinical trials and clinical practice, and provide examples from existing literature to illustrate the uses of PROs as the goals of treatment change in each setting.

Purpose: Sleep disturbance is common in patients with asthma and can lead to subsequent impacts on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Fit-for-purpose patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) assessing asthma-related sleep disturbance and next-day HRQOL impact (next-day impact) are needed to evaluate disease burden and treatment effects.

Patients and methods: Adults (18-65 years) from three US clinics were recruited for semistructured interviews. Concept elicitation (CE) identified how asthma affects participants' sleep and how asthma-related sleep disturbances impact their daily lives, which informed conceptual model development. Cognitive debriefing (CD) of the Asthma Sleep Disturbance Questionnaire (ASDQ), Sleep Diary, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Sleep-Related Impairment Short Form 8a (PROMIS SRI SF8a) was completed to assess each measure's content validity.

Results: Twelve individuals participated in two interview rounds (6 individuals per round). Participants most frequently reported asthma-related nighttime awakening and decreased sleep quality and duration. Negative impacts of a poor night's sleep due to asthma symptoms included feeling tired/fatigue/lack of energy and subsequent negative impacts on physical functioning, emotions and mood, mental functioning, work or volunteerism, and social functioning. Across both rounds of CD interviews, participants generally found the Sleep Diary and PROMIS SRI SF8a items relevant and easy to complete with no modifications. The ASDQ was modified for clarity and consistency.

Conclusion: As described in the conceptual model, asthma affects multiple aspects of sleep that can cause next-day fatigue and other subsequent negative HRQOL impacts. This study demonstrates that the ASDQ, Sleep Diary, and PROMIS SRI SF8a items are comprehensive, relevant, and appropriate for patients with moderate-to-severe, uncontrolled asthma. Evaluation of psychometric properties for the ASDQ, Sleep Diary, and PROMIS SRI SF8a based on clinical trial data in patients with moderate-to-severe, uncontrolled asthma will further support their use.

Background: The health services delivery system is debilitated in conflict setting areas due to damage of health facilities and attack on health care providers. Armed conflict is a complex phenomenon which causes a large amount of death and disability worldwide. However, there is lack of information towards treatment interruption among chronic disease patients in conflict areas. Hence, this study was conducted to assess the prevalence of armed conflict induced treatment interruption and its outcome among chronic disease patients.

Methods: A mixed cross sectional study design was conducted on a total of 399 sample size at North Wollo and Waghimra zone hospitals. To select study participants a consecutive sampling method was used. Multiple logistic regressions were computed to evaluate the association and thematic analysis was used to analyse qualitative data.

Results: From the total 399 study participants, 264 (64.6%) study participants interrupted their medication. Treatment interruption is significantly associated with poor service availability and perceived high stress.

Conclusion: War has detrimental health effects, both immediate and long term, on populations. Treatment interruptions due to armed conflict were caused by poor health care access, lack of medications and lack of transport and displacement of hospital staff, insecurity and fear. Treatment interruption results in morbidity, mortality, lifelong complications, disability, psychological and economic impact.

Background: One of the key dimensions of healthcare quality is patient-centeredness, which represents how well healthcare is geared towards patients' needs and wishes. Many questionnaires that measure the patient-centeredness are long and complicated, eliciting non-response or careless responding. Moreover, responses to some commonly used questionnaires are difficult to interpret. The Patient-Centeredness Questionnaire-Infertility (PCQ-Infertility) is used to measure the patient's experience of fertility healthcare quality. The aim of this study was to improve the PCQ-Infertility to allow large-scale clinical implementation.

Methods: The study was performed in three parts. First, shortcomings of the original PCQ-Infertility were identified by evaluation of expert opinions. Second, the number of items were reduced, and items were rescaled and rephrased. Third, 844 patients filled in the original PCQ-Infertility and 260 patients filled in the revised PCQ-Infertility and reliability analyses were performed. In addition, a confirmatory factor analysis was performed on the revised PCQ-Infertility.

Results: The number of items in the revised questionnaire was reduced by 24% (from 51 to 39 items), which increased the internal consistency and reliability. The reliability analyses and confirmatory factor analysis indicated high consistency and convergent validity in all seven dimensions (accessibility, information, communication, patient involvement, respect for patient's values, continuity and transition, and competence) of the revised PCQ-Infertility.

Conclusion: The revised PCQ-Infertility is a more valid and reliable instrument than the original PCQ-Infertility, easier to interpret and shorter. Therefore, large-scale clinical implementation and data analysis are now possible, giving the opportunity for fertility care professionals to evaluate and improve their healthcare.

Purpose: To understand pregnant women's experience with midwifery-led antenatal care services using the Respectful Maternity Care charter in primary health centers in Karachi, Pakistan.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was at Rehri Goth and Ibrahim Hyderi, two peri-urban communities in Karachi, Pakistan, where women receive antenatal care services. All pregnant women in their third trimester who consented during the study period were included. The participants were asked about access to care, antenatal care experience, person-centered approach, and general satisfaction with the facility using a pre-designed questionnaire. These themes were mapped onto the universal Respectful Maternity Care charter. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the findings in each of these themes. Multivariable logistic regression techniques to determine the relationship between the dependent and independent variables.

Results: There were 904 women who agreed to participate in this study during January to December 2021. Majority of the women (94%, n=854) were satisfied with the operating hours and cleanliness. More than 90% of the women reported positive experiences regarding privacy, respectful treatment by midwives, and non-discriminatory care. However, 40% (n=362) of the women reported not receiving adequate information and informed consent before a medical procedure, while 65% (n=587) reported poor counseling for birth preparedness. Maternal age, women's occupation, women's education, and parity were found to be significantly associated with respect provided, satisfaction with counseling and the consent process.

Conclusion: This study reported satisfaction of pregnant women with the facility's ambiance, respect, and care; however, poor communication skills regarding consent and antenatal counseling were reported. The findings suggest the need for more efficient strategies, such as regular respectful maternity care and technical training to strengthen midwife-patient interactions and enhance overall satisfaction, thus improving maternal and newborn outcomes.