Patient Related Outcome Measures最新文献

Introduction: To develop and psychometrically validate the Self-management Questionnaire for Patients with Lower Extremity Arterial Disease Patients Who Underwent Endovascular Revascularization (LESQ).

Methods: We developed the LESQ and validated it in a Chinese population. A three-round cross-sectional descriptive survey in six hospitals in China, involving samples of 271, 269, and 623 participants, respectively. The surveys were conducted between February 2021 to March 2022.

Results: The final version of the LESQ, with 22 items, was divided into three domains using exploratory factor analysis: medical management, rehabilitation exercise management, and daily life management. The questionnaire had good internal consistency reliability, with a Cronbach's α of 0.953 and good retest reliability, with the coefficients of 0.917, respectively. The content validity of the LESQ was 0.939. The three domains of the questionnaire were confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis. The optimal cut-off points were 52 and 70, respectively, using latent profile analysis.

Discussion: The LESQ is a new self-report questionnaire for measuring self-management ability with good reliability and validity through validation.

Purpose: The prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasing and CKD often goes undiagnosed and untreated until its later stages when irreversible damage has occurred. Patients with CKD have been reported to have lower quality of life than the general population, but the patient-reported outcome data on CKD patients in Finland are limited.

Patients and methods: The primary outcome of this structural, multiple-choice survey study was to assess life satisfaction and experienced health status in Finnish patients with CKD. The results were presented as numbers (n) and percentages (%). The secondary outcome was to identify patient groups using the K-means clustering method based on preselected response variables and to assess the associated background factors.

Results: In total, 558 patients with CKD responded to the electronic survey. Of the 395 patients who completed the whole survey, 39.7% reported their health status as good, pretty good, or excellent, and 59.9% were fairly or very satisfied with their life. Two clusters of patients could be identified based on their health status and life satisfaction: patients with (1) poorer or (2) better well-being. Patients with poorer well-being were more likely to have at least 3 comorbidities (66.8% vs 44.3%) and lack follow-up visits entirely (10.5% vs 1.9%), compared with patients with better well-being. The patients with poorer well-being were less often knowledgeable about the disease, its causes (35.5% vs 48.1%), and its care (30.7% vs 20.3%) than patients with better well-being, and they showed weaker adherence to lifestyle interventions such as following dietary instructions (30.3% vs 40.5%).

Conclusion: Screening for CKD to enable early diagnosis, early commitment to treatment, and empowering the patient by providing education are key for improvement of health and life satisfaction in patients with CKD. Therefore, resources should be allocated to these measures of action.

Background: Satisfaction with care is a concept quantified through diverse measurement tools. However, studies have indicated that measuring satisfaction is challenging due to the construct's multidimensional expression. Thus, obtaining valid results requires careful consideration of the construct's nature and measurement methods.

Purpose: The primary aim of this study was to examine how studies involving cancer caregivers have addressed the dimensionality of the construct when using satisfaction with care as an outcome, and whether this is reflected in the score reporting practices. We chose to investigate this by conducting a scoping review of the measurement tool Family Satisfaction with End-of-Life Care Scale (FAMCARE Scale), where scores can be reported as the mean of overall score, subscale scores and single-item scores.

Methods: This scoping review consisted of systematic searches using Medline, CINAHL, Embase, PsycInfo, Cochrane Library, and Epistemonikos. Two researchers used the Rayyan Qatar Computing Research Institute system to perform a blinded screening process. We extracted information on study design, purpose, evaluating of structural validity, variations in the type of scores reported, and justification for choosing the type(s) of scores that were analyzed.

Results: Twenty-three studies were included in the review, and their designs and reporting practices of score type varied substantially. Five studies reported analyses to test the scale's structural validity. Ten studies provided a justification for their choice of reporting method. The most common reporting practice found was using mean of overall scores, present in 20 of the included studies. Twelve studies reported mean of subscale scores, and ten reported single-item mean scores.

Conclusion: We found substantial variability in score reporting practices, highlighting the need for a more in-depth understanding and reflection on the multidimensional nature of caregiver satisfaction.

Purpose: Quantifying patient-perceived benefits and disadvantages of treatments in a real-world setting is increasingly important in healthcare decision-making. The Patient's Qualitative Assessment of Treatment (PQAT) assesses patient-perceived benefits and disadvantages of treatment, and associated trade-offs potentially influencing patients' willingness to continue treatment. It has then been modified to capture patients' perceived magnitude of benefits and disadvantages of treatment quantitatively, as well as qualitatively (PQATv2). However, the PQAT and the PQATv2 were designed for use and validated in a clinical trial setting. The objective of this study was to adapt and test the content validity of a version of the PQATv2 for use in real-world settings (PQAT-RW).

Patients and methods: The PQATv2 was adapted for use in real-world settings (PQAT-RW), and its content was validated in 16 patients with varied chronic medical conditions and medication regimens via semi-structured qualitative interviews.

Results: All participants reported that the PQAT-RW was "easy to understand". The majority (n = 11/16) reported that the items covered all important aspects of their treatment experience, and that no items needed to be removed or added to the instrument. Analysis of free-text responses identified eight global concepts considered by participants when evaluating the benefits and disadvantages of treatment: treatment effectiveness, side effects and method of administration were most frequently considered (as both benefits and disadvantages), followed by frequency of administration, financial considerations, storage, packaging and drug preparation.

Conclusion: The results of this study support the content validity of the PQAT-RW. They also demonstrate that using qualitative responses to contextualize quantitative responses provides unique insight into diverse and individualized patient-perceived benefits and disadvantages, and their relative importance, in real-world settings.

Introduction: Many research activities have focused on SARS-CoV-2 infection and subsequent COVID-19 respiratory illness during the pandemic. However, significant racial inequities emerged months after the COVID-19 pandemic began. The similarity between racial/ ethnic disparities in COVID-19 and those for other diseases raised awareness about the context for risk exposure and healthcare access. The purpose of this study is to examine social and structural determinants of health among COVID-19 survivors, carepartners, and the perspectives of healthcare stakeholders who experienced disruption during the early pandemic.

Material and methods: A purposive sample of interviews (n=9) and focus groups (n=10) were used to collect data regarding knowledge of barriers to effective COVID-19 risk mitigation, recovery, and chronic disease self-management. This included nurses, physicians, COVID-19 survivors and their carepartners, public health, and community leaders connected with the healthcare systems in rural counties of South Carolina.

Results: Five major themes were identified across the subgroups. The themes: The COVID-19 Illness Trajectory Added Major Health Challenges and Stressors, Access to Care Is Lacking, Support is Needed for COVID-19 Survivors and Care Partners, Support Must be Distributed Equitably, and Racism and Structural Issues Affect Stress reflect the strengths, opportunities, and inequities perceived within these groups.

Conclusion: This research is the first qualitative study focused on COVID-19 survivor-carepartner dyads that consider the intersectionality of race/ ethnicity, geography, and health that is known to occur when engaging healthcare systems. The themes illustrate the need for infectious disease prevention at all socioecological levels: structural/ systemic, community, organizational/ institutional, interpersonal, and individual.

Purpose: Breast cancer screening remains a challenge in the United States. Many women do not get a mammogram because of pain associated with the exam, radiation exposure, false-positive results, and additional costs. Others who may benefit from annual screening do not qualify because of young age and radiation risk. We hypothesize that a novel volumetric transmitted breast ultrasound, Quantitative Transmission (QT) Scan may encourage more women to have annual breast cancer screening. Assessing results from patient-reported outcomes (PROs) may predict the value of newer, more desirable screening technologies.

Participants and methods: Pre- and post-menopausal women who qualified for breast cancer screening were enrolled in a prospective trial of Quantitative Transmission (QT Scan) vs traditional mammography via Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) Clinical Trials.gov NCT03052166. These women completed questionnaires to assess their experiences with QT Scan and DBT. Associations between QT Scan or DBT and differences in PRO scores were examined.

Results: A total of 430 subjects completed the PRO instrument analyzed. A total of 36 questions were asked, 34 were paired for both QT and DBT and two were asked regarding exclusively the QT Scan. Physical discomfort, perceptions of safety and low efficacy, false-positive results and additional out-of-pocket expenses were concerns identified as highest risk for opting out of screening mammography (differences between 2.1 and 2.9 indicate significant differences between means and standard deviations using the Cohen's d statistic). Student's T-test shows a significance level of <10 ^-10. Statistically significant differences in PROs between QT Scan and DBT were observed by 14 of the 17 paired experience questions (p<0.001).

Conclusion: Significant differences in PROs were found between QT scan and DBT, indicating women have significantly more negative experiences with traditional mammography via DBT and are less inclined to undergo screening mammography. Identification of PRO differences could be used to help identify a more desirable breast cancer screening modality.

Aim: Negative symptoms of schizophrenia (NSS) have been linked with poor functional outcomes. A literature review was performed to identify instruments used to assess functional outcomes and quality of life in clinical trials and observational studies conducted in groups of people with NSS.

Methods: Literature search strings were designed using Medical Subject Headings combined with free-text terms and searches were performed using the PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library databases. For inclusion, articles were required to be published as full-text articles, in English, over the period 2011-2021, include at least one group or treatment arm of people with NSS and report either functional outcomes or quality of life (QoL).

Results: Literature searches identified a total of 3,268 unique hits. After two rounds of screening, 37 publications (covering 35 individual studies) were included in the review. A total of fourteen different instruments were used to assess functional outcomes and eleven different instruments were used to assess QoL. In studies in people with NSS, the most frequently used functional outcome measures were the Personal and Social Performance scale and the Global Assessment of Functioning. The most frequently used QoL instruments included the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life, the Heinrich Carpenter Quality of Life Scale, the Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale and the EQ-5D.

Conclusion: A large number of measures have been used to assess functional outcomes and QoL in people with NSS, these include both generic and condition-specific as well as both interviewer-administered and self-reported instruments.

Introduction: Quality of life (QoL) is impaired in patients with acne vulgaris. The Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI) that assesses QoL of acne patients was initially developed in English and is being currently used widely after being validated in different languages. This study was conducted to validate the CADI in Sinhala, a language used by the majority of Sri Lanka.

Materials and methods: The CADI was translated into Sinhala, and lingually validated as per published guidelines. This CADI-Sinhala version and the Sinhala version of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) were simultaneously administered to 150 Sinhala-speaking young adults with acne. The clinical severity of acne was assessed using the Global Acne Grading System (GAGS). The Cronbach's alpha and Spearman correlation coefficients were used to determine the internal consistency, reliability, and validity of the CADI-Sinhala. Construct validity was examined using a factor analysis.

Results: The study included 90% females and their mean age was 23 (SD, 2.5) years. The majority (97.3%) had acne of mild to moderate severity when measured by the GAGS. The CADI-Sinhala Scale showed a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.819 indicating high internal consistency and reliability. The mean item-total correlation coefficient was 0.74 (range, 0.42-0.87) with CADI Q3 having the lowest correlation. CADI Sinhala showed a strong and highly significant correlation with the Sinhala DLQI (Spearman's rho = 0.66; P< 0.001) indicating concurrent validity. The correlation with GAGS was of low intensity, although it was statistically significant (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: The CADI-Sinhala is a reliable and valid tool for assessing the QoL of Sinhala-speaking acne patients. This five-item tool will help clinicians to provide holistic treatment through improved understanding of patient's perspectives.

Background: The High Activity Arthroplasty Score (HAAS) is a validated score that assesses functional outcomes after lower limb arthroplasty, with fewer ceiling effects than other scores. The aim is to translate and cross-culturally adapt the HAAS into a Chinese version (HAAS-C) and to evaluate the psychometric properties of HAAS-C in patients after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods: A total of 104 patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis who had undergone TKA at least 12 months prior were recruited. A forward and backward translation procedure was performed for developing a culturally acceptable HAAS-C. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's α, and test-retest reliability was measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) within a 10-day interval. Construct validity was assessed by examining the correlations between HAAS-C and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), EuroQoL Group's five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), and Oxford knee score (OKS).

Results: HAAS-C demonstrated adequate Internal consistency reliability, as indicated by Cronbach's α coefficient of 0.75. Test-retest reliability yielded excellent results, with an ICC value of 0.98. Content validity indices were high, with a scale-level validity index of 0.9 and item-level validity indices greater than or equal to 0.8. HAAS-C showed a strong correlation with WOMAC (r = 0.69), a moderate correlation with EQ-5D-5L (r = 0.43), and OKS (r = 0.53) while exhibiting no floor or ceiling effects.

Conclusion: The validated HAAS-C questionnaire is a valid instrument for assessing patients undergoing TKA in mainland China.

Background: A time-motion study is a scientific method for recording time spent on various tasks in a narrow range of specialized work settings, beginning with initial enrollment in ART provision. Therefore, the study aimed to assess the time motion of patient satisfaction with antiretroviral therapy services in Central Ethiopia.

Methods: A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted on a sample of 422 patients from June 14 to July 30, 2021. We used a simple random sampling technique to select the participants. Structural input-related qualitative data were collected using an in-depth interview and used for concurrent triangulation with quantitative. Quantitative data were collected using a standardized and pre-tested questionnaire and analyzed using SPSS version 24.0. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regressions were used to identify independent predictors of time motion and patient satisfaction. The degree of association between the outcome and independent variables was assessed by using an odds ratio with a 95% CI.

Results: The time motion of patient satisfaction study found that 53.1% (224/422) of the study participants were satisfied. As independent predictors, time spent (time motion) waiting to be seen by a health professional (AOR = 0.228, 95% CI = 0.079-0.661), patient-provider interaction (AOR = 3.72, 95% CI = 2.111-5.771), perceived privacy (AOR = 2.912, 95% CI = 1.76-2.78), sex (AOR = 2.499, 95% CI = 1.556-4.009), and income class (AOR = 0.228, 95% CI = 0.073-0.707) were associated with outcome variable.

Conclusion: The study found low patient satisfaction with ART services, indicating the need for further improvement to enhance patient-centered services with the given time motion. Therefore, further research is needed to assess the intensity and reach of the information through an analysis of pre- and post-intervention that provides a complete picture of conceptualizations of time motion studies.