Journal of Applied Research in Plant Sciences最新文献

英文中文

Management of Downy Mildew of Onion Through Selective Fungicides in the Field Condition 大田条件下选择性杀菌剂防治洋葱霜霉病的研究

Journal of Applied Research in Plant Sciences

Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.38211/joarps.2021.2.1.13

T. A. Bhatti, Z. A. Nizamani, Muswar Ali Gadhi, F. Soomro, Raj Kumar, Saeed Ahmed Abro, A. H. Soomro, S. Qazi, Umer ul din Jarwar Abdul Ghani Kandhro, Madiha Khan

Efficacy of variousfungicides against powdery mildew of onion all chemical treated 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th observation Score observation in plants (out of 15) were0.97, 2.89, 2.44 and 2.22 against 2.33, 9.00, 10.00 and 10.33 in control; disease infection 6.47, 20.00, 16.30 and 14.07% against 15.56, 60.00, 66.67 and 68.89% in control; infected leaves/plant 0.20, 2.04, 2.38 and 2.02 against 1.04, 4.36,4.99 and 4.04leaves in control, respectively. The Cabriotop observation resulted in infected plants 1.00, 2.56, 1.89 and 1.67 against 2.32, 9.00, 10.00 and 10.33 in control; disease infection 6.67, 17.04, 12.59 and 11.11 against 15.56, 60.00, 66.67 and 68.89% in control, infected leaves 0.41, 2.22, 2.62 and 2.07 against 1.04, 4.36, 4.99 and 4.04 in control, respectively with average bulb weight of 126.50g.The Relly observation in infected plants 0.96, 3.33, 2.78 and 3.11 against 2.33, 9.00, 10.00 and 10.33 in control; disease infection 6.42, 22.22, 18.52 and 20.74% against 15.56, 60.00, 66.67 and 68.89% in control; infected leaves 0.41, 2.22, 2.62 and 2.07 against 1.04, 4.36, 4.99 and 4.04 in control, respectively with average bulb weight of 116.38g against 74.34g in control. Defer plus at observation resulted ininfected plants of 0.95, 2.78, 2.56 and 2.78 against 2.33, 9.00, 10.00 and 10.33 in control; disease infection 6.33, 18.52, 17.04 and 18.52% against 15.56, 60.00, 66.67 and 68.89% in control; infected leaves 0.50, 2.10, 2.48 and 1.96 against 1.04, 4.36, 4.99 and 4.04/plant in control; with average bulb weight of 101.63g, 106.97g and 112.61g overall average bulb weight of 107.07g against 74.34g bulb weight on average in control

不同杀菌剂对化学处理洋葱白粉病的防治效果(1、2、3、4组):15株植物的得分分别为0.97、2.89、2.44、2.22，对照为2.33、9.00、10.00、10.33;疾病感染率分别为6.47、20.00、16.30、14.07%，对照组为15.56、60.00、66.67、68.89%;染病叶片/株分别为0.20、2.04、2.38和2.02，对照为1.04、4.36、4.99和4.04。Cabriotop检测结果显示，感染株分别为1.00、2.56、1.89和1.67，对照为2.32、9.00、10.00和10.33;病染率分别为6.67、17.04、12.59、11.11，对照为15.56、60.00、66.67、68.89%;病染叶片分别为0.41、2.22、2.62、2.07，对照为1.04、4.36、4.99、4.04，平均鳞茎重为126.50g。与对照的2.33、9.00、10.00和10.33相比，侵染植株的赖利值分别为0.96、3.33、2.78和3.11;疾病感染率分别为6.42、22.22、18.52、20.74%，对照组为15.56、60.00、66.67、68.89%;侵染叶片分别为0.41、2.22、2.62和2.07，对照为1.04、4.36、4.99和4.04，平均鳞茎重为116.38g，对照为74.34g。延迟加株的侵染株数分别为0.95、2.78、2.56和2.78，对照株数分别为2.33、9.00、10.00和10.33;疾病感染率分别为6.33、18.52、17.04、18.52%，对照组为15.56、60.00、66.67、68.89%;侵染叶片为0.50、2.10、2.48、1.96 /株，对照为1.04、4.36、4.99、4.04/株;平均球茎重量分别为101.63g、106.97g和112.61g，对照组平均球茎重量为107.07g，对照组平均球茎重量为74.34g

{"title":"Management of Downy Mildew of Onion Through Selective Fungicides in the Field Condition","authors":"T. A. Bhatti, Z. A. Nizamani, Muswar Ali Gadhi, F. Soomro, Raj Kumar, Saeed Ahmed Abro, A. H. Soomro, S. Qazi, Umer ul din Jarwar Abdul Ghani Kandhro, Madiha Khan","doi":"10.38211/joarps.2021.2.1.13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.38211/joarps.2021.2.1.13","url":null,"abstract":"Efficacy of variousfungicides against powdery mildew of onion all chemical treated 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th observation Score observation in plants (out of 15) were0.97, 2.89, 2.44 and 2.22 against 2.33, 9.00, 10.00 and 10.33 in control; disease infection 6.47, 20.00, 16.30 and 14.07% against 15.56, 60.00, 66.67 and 68.89% in control; infected leaves/plant 0.20, 2.04, 2.38 and 2.02 against 1.04, 4.36,4.99 and 4.04leaves in control, respectively. The Cabriotop observation resulted in infected plants 1.00, 2.56, 1.89 and 1.67 against 2.32, 9.00, 10.00 and 10.33 in control; disease infection 6.67, 17.04, 12.59 and 11.11 against 15.56, 60.00, 66.67 and 68.89% in control, infected leaves 0.41, 2.22, 2.62 and 2.07 against 1.04, 4.36, 4.99 and 4.04 in control, respectively with average bulb weight of 126.50g.The Relly observation in infected plants 0.96, 3.33, 2.78 and 3.11 against 2.33, 9.00, 10.00 and 10.33 in control; disease infection 6.42, 22.22, 18.52 and 20.74% against 15.56, 60.00, 66.67 and 68.89% in control; infected leaves 0.41, 2.22, 2.62 and 2.07 against 1.04, 4.36, 4.99 and 4.04 in control, respectively with average bulb weight of 116.38g against 74.34g in control. Defer plus at observation resulted ininfected plants of 0.95, 2.78, 2.56 and 2.78 against 2.33, 9.00, 10.00 and 10.33 in control; disease infection 6.33, 18.52, 17.04 and 18.52% against 15.56, 60.00, 66.67 and 68.89% in control; infected leaves 0.50, 2.10, 2.48 and 1.96 against 1.04, 4.36, 4.99 and 4.04/plant in control; with average bulb weight of 101.63g, 106.97g and 112.61g overall average bulb weight of 107.07g against 74.34g bulb weight on average in control","PeriodicalId":197597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Research in Plant Sciences","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129827235","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

首页上一页

类型

全部化学•材料生命科学医学物理工程技术环境•农林材料科学地球科学法学管理学化学环境科学与生态学计算机科学教育学经济学农林科学人文科学生物学数学物理与天体物理心理学综合性期刊其他工业工程理学历史学农学文学信息工程

数据库

全部 ACS Publications Elsevier ieeexplore Springer The Royal Society of Chemistry Wiley

期刊

Journal of Applied Research in Plant Sciences

全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.

﹀