Pub Date : 2025-07-16eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1155/prm/6601529
Peter D Drummond, Lechi Vo, Matthew Carabetta
Exposing the skin to high levels of ultraviolet B (UVB) radiation induces an inflammatory response that upregulates local nociceptive processing; this, in turn, facilitates protective responses to limit further injury. In this study, the UVB model was used to explore additional effects of inflammation on supraspinal nociceptive processing. Thirty-one healthy participants attended two sessions approximately 24 h apart. In each session, pressure-pain thresholds and sensitivity to sharp stimulation and heat were assessed in both forearms, and pressure-pain thresholds and sensitivity to sharp stimulation were assessed on each side of the forehead. In a novel paradigm, supraspinal nociceptive processing was explored by assessing pain and blink reflexes to electrical stimulation of the forehead, paired with acoustic startle stimuli. At the end of the first session, UVB radiation at a dose sufficient to induce erythema at the most exposed site was administered to one forearm. Consistent with local sensitization, sensitivity to heat and sharp stimulation had increased at the maximally exposed site 24 h later. This local response was accompanied by changes in supraspinal nociceptive processing-pressure-pain thresholds were lower on the ipsilateral than contralateral side of the forehead, and acoustic startle stimuli augmented electrically evoked pain. Blink reflexes weakened from the first to the second session, but decreases were smaller on the UVB-treated than contralateral side. Together, these findings suggest that acoustic startle stimuli facilitated activity in sensitized supraspinal nociceptive pathways. Potentially, this supraspinal mechanism adds to the burden of chronic nociplastic pain during states of heightened arousal and stress.
{"title":"Ultraviolet B Treatment of the Forearm Alters Supraspinal Nociceptive Processing.","authors":"Peter D Drummond, Lechi Vo, Matthew Carabetta","doi":"10.1155/prm/6601529","DOIUrl":"10.1155/prm/6601529","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Exposing the skin to high levels of ultraviolet B (UVB) radiation induces an inflammatory response that upregulates local nociceptive processing; this, in turn, facilitates protective responses to limit further injury. In this study, the UVB model was used to explore additional effects of inflammation on supraspinal nociceptive processing. Thirty-one healthy participants attended two sessions approximately 24 h apart. In each session, pressure-pain thresholds and sensitivity to sharp stimulation and heat were assessed in both forearms, and pressure-pain thresholds and sensitivity to sharp stimulation were assessed on each side of the forehead. In a novel paradigm, supraspinal nociceptive processing was explored by assessing pain and blink reflexes to electrical stimulation of the forehead, paired with acoustic startle stimuli. At the end of the first session, UVB radiation at a dose sufficient to induce erythema at the most exposed site was administered to one forearm. Consistent with local sensitization, sensitivity to heat and sharp stimulation had increased at the maximally exposed site 24 h later. This local response was accompanied by changes in supraspinal nociceptive processing-pressure-pain thresholds were lower on the ipsilateral than contralateral side of the forehead, and acoustic startle stimuli augmented electrically evoked pain. Blink reflexes weakened from the first to the second session, but decreases were smaller on the UVB-treated than contralateral side. Together, these findings suggest that acoustic startle stimuli facilitated activity in sensitized supraspinal nociceptive pathways. Potentially, this supraspinal mechanism adds to the burden of chronic nociplastic pain during states of heightened arousal and stress.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2025 ","pages":"6601529"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12286694/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144699231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Pain status is a common concern among older adults and has been linked to functional limitations. This study aimed to examine the association between pain status and disabilities risk in basic activities of daily living (BADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) in older adults in China, using data from the 2020 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using data from 8102 participants aged 60 and older from the 2020 CHARLS. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association between pain status and BADL/IADL disabilities. We further examined the contribution of each covariate and categorized participants by pain location and number of pain sites. Subgroup analyses were conducted to examine the consistency of findings across demographic and health-related factors. Results: Pain status was significantly associated with higher odds of both BADL and IADL disabilities (p < 0.05), even after adjusting for covariates. Self-rated health and depressive symptoms exerted the greatest influence on the OR values. Pain in any anatomical region, particularly when present at multiple sites, was associated with increased odds of disability. Head and neck pain was specifically associated with IADL disability, while pain in the upper limbs, torso, and lower limbs was associated with both BADL and IADL disabilities. Subgroup analyses confirmed the robustness of these associations. Conclusions: Pain status, especially multisite pain, is significantly associated with BADL and IADL disabilities in older Chinese adults. Although causality cannot be inferred due to the study's cross-sectional design, these findings underscore the importance of addressing pain alongside other health and psychological factors when developing strategies to support functional independence in aging populations.
{"title":"Pain Status and Disability in Activities of Daily Living Among Older Adults in China: Evidence From CHARLS 2020.","authors":"Jingjing Chu, Luxi Weng, Wen Jin, Xi Yin, Qin Xu, Zherong Xu","doi":"10.1155/prm/4974163","DOIUrl":"10.1155/prm/4974163","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Pain status is a common concern among older adults and has been linked to functional limitations. This study aimed to examine the association between pain status and disabilities risk in basic activities of daily living (BADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) in older adults in China, using data from the 2020 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using data from 8102 participants aged 60 and older from the 2020 CHARLS. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association between pain status and BADL/IADL disabilities. We further examined the contribution of each covariate and categorized participants by pain location and number of pain sites. Subgroup analyses were conducted to examine the consistency of findings across demographic and health-related factors. <b>Results:</b> Pain status was significantly associated with higher odds of both BADL and IADL disabilities (<i>p</i> < 0.05), even after adjusting for covariates. Self-rated health and depressive symptoms exerted the greatest influence on the OR values. Pain in any anatomical region, particularly when present at multiple sites, was associated with increased odds of disability. Head and neck pain was specifically associated with IADL disability, while pain in the upper limbs, torso, and lower limbs was associated with both BADL and IADL disabilities. Subgroup analyses confirmed the robustness of these associations. <b>Conclusions:</b> Pain status, especially multisite pain, is significantly associated with BADL and IADL disabilities in older Chinese adults. Although causality cannot be inferred due to the study's cross-sectional design, these findings underscore the importance of addressing pain alongside other health and psychological factors when developing strategies to support functional independence in aging populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2025 ","pages":"4974163"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12286672/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144699158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP) is often associated with impaired mobility, functional limitations, and psychological distress. While myofascial release (MFR) and capacitive-resistive therapy (TECAR) have individually shown potential benefits, evidence regarding their combined application is limited. Methods: This assessor-blinded, three-arm randomized controlled trial included 67 patients with CNLBP. Participants were assigned to MFR alone, resistive-mode TECAR (R-TECAR) alone, or MFR plus R-TECAR. Interventions were administered twice weekly for 4 weeks, with each session lasting 20 min. Primary outcomes included the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), assessed at the baseline, 4 weeks, and one-and-a-half-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes encompassed thoracolumbar fascia (TLF) thickness, pressure pain threshold (PPT), trunk mobility, quality of life, anxiety, and depression. Intention-to-treat analyses were performed. Results: All interventions yielded significant improvements in pain and disability over time, although the combined MFR + R-TECAR therapy did not achieve statistically significant additional benefits compared with single therapies. Notably, a significant interaction effect emerged for PPT in the right quadratus lumborum muscle (p=0.01), with the MFR + R-TECAR group demonstrating greater improvement than R-TECAR alone. Other secondary outcomes, including TLF thickness and psychometric measures, improved over time but showed no significant between-group differences. Conclusions: Combining MFR with R-TECAR for CNLBP did not produce superior outcomes compared with individual treatments though certain muscle-specific benefits were observed. Future research should focus on optimizing treatment parameters, extending intervention and follow-up periods, and exploring individualized approaches to maximize therapeutic efficacy. Trial Registration: Chinese Registry of Clinical Trials: ChiCTR2400087961.
{"title":"Effectiveness of Myofascial Release Combined With Capacitive-Resistive Therapy in Patients With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Peng Zhao, Zhoupeng Lu, Hui Zou, Jialin Wang, Yuwei He, Meng Li, Jianfa Xu, Xinwen Cui","doi":"10.1155/prm/9309502","DOIUrl":"10.1155/prm/9309502","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP) is often associated with impaired mobility, functional limitations, and psychological distress. While myofascial release (MFR) and capacitive-resistive therapy (TECAR) have individually shown potential benefits, evidence regarding their combined application is limited. <b>Methods:</b> This assessor-blinded, three-arm randomized controlled trial included 67 patients with CNLBP. Participants were assigned to MFR alone, resistive-mode TECAR (R-TECAR) alone, or MFR plus R-TECAR. Interventions were administered twice weekly for 4 weeks, with each session lasting 20 min. Primary outcomes included the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), assessed at the baseline, 4 weeks, and one-and-a-half-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes encompassed thoracolumbar fascia (TLF) thickness, pressure pain threshold (PPT), trunk mobility, quality of life, anxiety, and depression. Intention-to-treat analyses were performed. <b>Results:</b> All interventions yielded significant improvements in pain and disability over time, although the combined MFR + R-TECAR therapy did not achieve statistically significant additional benefits compared with single therapies. Notably, a significant interaction effect emerged for PPT in the right quadratus lumborum muscle (<i>p</i>=0.01), with the MFR + R-TECAR group demonstrating greater improvement than R-TECAR alone. Other secondary outcomes, including TLF thickness and psychometric measures, improved over time but showed no significant between-group differences. <b>Conclusions:</b> Combining MFR with R-TECAR for CNLBP did not produce superior outcomes compared with individual treatments though certain muscle-specific benefits were observed. Future research should focus on optimizing treatment parameters, extending intervention and follow-up periods, and exploring individualized approaches to maximize therapeutic efficacy. <b>Trial Registration:</b> Chinese Registry of Clinical Trials: ChiCTR2400087961.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2025 ","pages":"9309502"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12274100/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144675498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-10eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1155/prm/7550108
Álvaro-José Rodríguez-Domínguez, Manuel Rebollo-Salas, Raquel Chillón-Martínez, Melania Cardellat-González, Laura Blanco-Heras, José-Jesús Jiménez-Rejano
Objective: The objective was to compare the effectiveness of a combined pain neuroscience education and resistance training program (PNE + RT) with that of a combined aerobic and flexibility exercise program (AE + FE). Design: A randomized pilot study was conducted in women with fibromyalgia. Methods: Thirty-one women with fibromyalgia were randomized into the experimental group (PNE + RT, n = 15) and the usual care group (AE + FE, n = 16). Both groups carried out the intervention 3 days a week for 12 weeks. Primary outcomes were pain intensity, disability, and symptoms related to central sensitization (CS). Among them, pain intensity was considered the main primary endpoint for statistical analysis and interpretation. Secondary outcomes were pressure pain threshold (PPT), maximum handgrip strength (MHS), and stiffness. Results: Statistically significant between-group differences were found in favor of PNE + RT group for short-term pain intensity (p < 0.05) and PPT trapezius (p < 0.05). PNE + RT also showed statistically significant within-group improvements in pain intensity (p < 0.01), CS-related symptoms (p < 0.01), PPT quadriceps (p < 0.01), and MHS of the left hand (p < 0.01). Disability improved significantly in both groups (p < 0.01). There were no significant changes in stiffness. Conclusion: The PNE + RT program is more effective than the AE + FE program in improving pain intensity in the short term and PPT in the trapezius muscle in the long term. PNE + RT is also effective in improving disability, pain intensity, CS-related symptoms (short and long term), and left MHS and PPT in the quadriceps muscle (long term), although it is not more effective than AE + FE. The AE + FE program is only effective in improving disability. These findings are preliminary, and larger studies are needed to confirm the results. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04855851.
{"title":"Pain Neuroscience Education and Resistance Training in Women With Fibromyalgia: A Randomized Control Pilot Study.","authors":"Álvaro-José Rodríguez-Domínguez, Manuel Rebollo-Salas, Raquel Chillón-Martínez, Melania Cardellat-González, Laura Blanco-Heras, José-Jesús Jiménez-Rejano","doi":"10.1155/prm/7550108","DOIUrl":"10.1155/prm/7550108","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The objective was to compare the effectiveness of a combined pain neuroscience education and resistance training program (PNE + RT) with that of a combined aerobic and flexibility exercise program (AE + FE). <b>Design:</b> A randomized pilot study was conducted in women with fibromyalgia. <b>Methods:</b> Thirty-one women with fibromyalgia were randomized into the experimental group (PNE + RT, <i>n</i> = 15) and the usual care group (AE + FE, <i>n</i> = 16). Both groups carried out the intervention 3 days a week for 12 weeks. Primary outcomes were pain intensity, disability, and symptoms related to central sensitization (CS). Among them, pain intensity was considered the main primary endpoint for statistical analysis and interpretation. Secondary outcomes were pressure pain threshold (PPT), maximum handgrip strength (MHS), and stiffness. <b>Results:</b> Statistically significant between-group differences were found in favor of PNE + RT group for short-term pain intensity (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and PPT trapezius (<i>p</i> < 0.05). PNE + RT also showed statistically significant within-group improvements in pain intensity (<i>p</i> < 0.01), CS-related symptoms (<i>p</i> < 0.01), PPT quadriceps (<i>p</i> < 0.01), and MHS of the left hand (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Disability improved significantly in both groups (<i>p</i> < 0.01). There were no significant changes in stiffness. <b>Conclusion:</b> The PNE + RT program is more effective than the AE + FE program in improving pain intensity in the short term and PPT in the trapezius muscle in the long term. PNE + RT is also effective in improving disability, pain intensity, CS-related symptoms (short and long term), and left MHS and PPT in the quadriceps muscle (long term), although it is not more effective than AE + FE. The AE + FE program is only effective in improving disability. These findings are preliminary, and larger studies are needed to confirm the results. <b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04855851.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2025 ","pages":"7550108"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12271695/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144675499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Postoperative pain in thoracic surgery often requires opioids, yet can be poorly managed with short-acting anesthetics. Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) offers prolonged analgesia, potentially improving pain control and reducing opioid use. This study evaluates LB's effectiveness and safety in thoracic postoperative pain management, aiming to provide an alternative to current practices. Methods: In this single-center, double-blind, prospective, randomized controlled trial, patients undergoing uniportal lobectomy, segmentectomy, or wedge resection from November 2023 to May 2024 were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 0.375% ropivacaine (control group, n = 57) or LB (LB group, n = 56) for intercostal nerve blocks (ICNBs). Postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores, opioid consumption, overall benefit of analgesia score (OBAS), chest tube duration, length of hospital stay, and adverse events (AEs) were recorded and analyzed. Results: Data from 57 patients in the control group and 56 patients in the LB group were included in the analysis, with no significant demographic differences between the groups. The LB group demonstrated lower VAS scores at rest and during activity (p > 0.05), reduced opioid consumption (p=0.021), and higher OBAS (p < 0.01) compared with the control group. No significant differences were observed in chest tube duration, length of hospital stay, or AEs between the groups. Conclusion: LB is safe and effective for ICNB, providing significant postoperative pain relief for patients undergoing uniportal thoracoscopic surgery. Trial Registration: Chinese Registry of Clinical Trials: chiCTR2300075463.
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Bupivacaine Liposomal in Intercostal Nerve Block for Postoperative Pain Management Following Uniportal Thoracoscopy: A Randomized Trial.","authors":"Lingjun Dong, Xiang Wang, Linhai Fu, Zongming Jiang, Yulong Wang, Aixia Chen, Jianyi Ding, Guangmao Yu","doi":"10.1155/prm/8816879","DOIUrl":"10.1155/prm/8816879","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Postoperative pain in thoracic surgery often requires opioids, yet can be poorly managed with short-acting anesthetics. Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) offers prolonged analgesia, potentially improving pain control and reducing opioid use. This study evaluates LB's effectiveness and safety in thoracic postoperative pain management, aiming to provide an alternative to current practices. <b>Methods:</b> In this single-center, double-blind, prospective, randomized controlled trial, patients undergoing uniportal lobectomy, segmentectomy, or wedge resection from November 2023 to May 2024 were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 0.375% ropivacaine (control group, <i>n</i> = 57) or LB (LB group, <i>n</i> = 56) for intercostal nerve blocks (ICNBs). Postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores, opioid consumption, overall benefit of analgesia score (OBAS), chest tube duration, length of hospital stay, and adverse events (AEs) were recorded and analyzed. <b>Results:</b> Data from 57 patients in the control group and 56 patients in the LB group were included in the analysis, with no significant demographic differences between the groups. The LB group demonstrated lower VAS scores at rest and during activity (<i>p</i> > 0.05), reduced opioid consumption (<i>p</i>=0.021), and higher OBAS (<i>p</i> < 0.01) compared with the control group. No significant differences were observed in chest tube duration, length of hospital stay, or AEs between the groups. <b>Conclusion:</b> LB is safe and effective for ICNB, providing significant postoperative pain relief for patients undergoing uniportal thoracoscopic surgery. <b>Trial Registration:</b> Chinese Registry of Clinical Trials: chiCTR2300075463.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2025 ","pages":"8816879"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12267960/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144659824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1155/prm/7181066
Roger Gregory Biringer
The American Migraine Foundation estimates that over 39 million Americans and over 1 billion people worldwide suffer from some form of migraine. Treatment of migraine generally falls into two categories: treatment of attacks once they have begun, and prophylactic prevention, including lifestyle changes. The use of phytocannabinoids to reduce both the frequency and severity of migraine is widely documented in scientific, grey, and popular literature. This review provides descriptions of both preclinical and clinical studies involving the treatment of migraines with phytocannabinoids as well as the involvement of endocannabinoids and endocannabinoid-like compounds in migraine pathology, including the receptors and associated mechanisms. Currently unanswered questions and areas for further exploration are discussed.
{"title":"Treatment of Migraine With Phytocannabinoids, the Involvement of Endocannabinoids in Migraine, and Potential Mechanisms of Action.","authors":"Roger Gregory Biringer","doi":"10.1155/prm/7181066","DOIUrl":"10.1155/prm/7181066","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The American Migraine Foundation estimates that over 39 million Americans and over 1 billion people worldwide suffer from some form of migraine. Treatment of migraine generally falls into two categories: treatment of attacks once they have begun, and prophylactic prevention, including lifestyle changes. The use of phytocannabinoids to reduce both the frequency and severity of migraine is widely documented in scientific, grey, and popular literature. This review provides descriptions of both preclinical and clinical studies involving the treatment of migraines with phytocannabinoids as well as the involvement of endocannabinoids and endocannabinoid-like compounds in migraine pathology, including the receptors and associated mechanisms. Currently unanswered questions and areas for further exploration are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2025 ","pages":"7181066"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12237567/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144591955","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-19eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1155/prm/5556400
Raoul Daoust, Jean Paquet, Jeffrey J Perry, Justin W Yan, David Williamson, Véronique Castonguay, Gilles Lavigne, Dominique Rouleau, Justine Lessard, Alexis Cournoyer
Background: Self-declared chronic pain has not been compared to existing definitions. Our objective was to evaluate the agreement between self-declared chronic pain and different chronic pain definitions, three months after an emergency department (ED) visit. Methods: In this planned substudy of a prospective multicenter cohort study, we included consecutive patients aged ≥ 18 years with an acute pain condition discharged from the ED with an opioid prescription. Three months after their ED visit, participants were asked about their pain intensity, pain frequency, pain disability, and self-declared chronic pain. Agreement between self-declared chronic pain and five other definitions were calculated with kappas. Results: A total of 1411 participants were included; mean age was 52 (±16) years, and 53% were female. Prevalence of self-declared chronic pain was 23.0% and varied from 16.9% to 45.3% for other definitions. Agreement of self-declared chronic pain was moderate (0.57-0.60) with most definitions but lower with the pain intensity ≥ 1 definition (0.47). The proportion of chronic pain participants using opioids ( ⁓20%) or other analgesics (⁓80%) was similar with all definitions except for the pain intensity ≥ 1 definition which was associated with a lower proportion of analgesic use (11%, 64%). Conclusion: In summary, self-declared chronic pain displayed moderate agreement with other chronic pain definitions and similar analgesic consumption but lower with the pain intensity ≥ 1 definition. Nonetheless, chronic pain prevalence varied greatly depending on how it was defined. Self-declared chronic pain might be a more patient-centered outcome and could be easily applied to standardize chronic pain definition. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03953534.
{"title":"How Does Self-Declared Chronic Pain Compare to Other Definitions? A Prospective Multicenter Study.","authors":"Raoul Daoust, Jean Paquet, Jeffrey J Perry, Justin W Yan, David Williamson, Véronique Castonguay, Gilles Lavigne, Dominique Rouleau, Justine Lessard, Alexis Cournoyer","doi":"10.1155/prm/5556400","DOIUrl":"10.1155/prm/5556400","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Self-declared chronic pain has not been compared to existing definitions. Our objective was to evaluate the agreement between self-declared chronic pain and different chronic pain definitions, three months after an emergency department (ED) visit. <b>Methods:</b> In this planned substudy of a prospective multicenter cohort study, we included consecutive patients aged ≥ 18 years with an acute pain condition discharged from the ED with an opioid prescription. Three months after their ED visit, participants were asked about their pain intensity, pain frequency, pain disability, and self-declared chronic pain. Agreement between self-declared chronic pain and five other definitions were calculated with kappas. <b>Results:</b> A total of 1411 participants were included; mean age was 52 (±16) years, and 53% were female. Prevalence of self-declared chronic pain was 23.0% and varied from 16.9% to 45.3% for other definitions. Agreement of self-declared chronic pain was moderate (0.57-0.60) with most definitions but lower with the pain intensity ≥ 1 definition (0.47). The proportion of chronic pain participants using opioids ( ⁓20%) or other analgesics (⁓80%) was similar with all definitions except for the pain intensity ≥ 1 definition which was associated with a lower proportion of analgesic use (11%, 64%). <b>Conclusion:</b> In summary, self-declared chronic pain displayed moderate agreement with other chronic pain definitions and similar analgesic consumption but lower with the pain intensity ≥ 1 definition. Nonetheless, chronic pain prevalence varied greatly depending on how it was defined. Self-declared chronic pain might be a more patient-centered outcome and could be easily applied to standardize chronic pain definition. <b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03953534.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2025 ","pages":"5556400"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12202084/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144507496","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-05eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1155/prm/4687197
Xiuzhi Wang, Yipeng Le, Xichen Wang, Yingchao Song, Qian Su, Xiaoxiao Xiao, Yifan Li, Wen Qin, Chunshui Yu, Meng Liang
Chronic pain is a prevalent and debilitating condition that imposes substantial personal and societal burdens. Despite its significance, the neural mechanisms underlying individual susceptibility to chronic pain remain inadequately understood. In this study, we examined the prospective associations between 1325 brain structural imaging phenotypes and the future risk of developing chronic pain in a UK Biobank cohort of 5754-5756 participants. These phenotypes encompassed regional and tissue volume, cortical surface area and thickness. General linear models (GLMs) were employed to identify brain structural variations associated with the risk of developing chronic pain, and then Mendelian randomization (MR) was employed to explore potential causal relationships between brain structure and chronic pain development. GLMs identified three significant associations between imaging phenotypes and the future development of chronic pain. All three imaging phenotypes pertained to the cortical surface area of the frontal operculum, albeit derived from three different brain atlases. Specifically, reduced cortical surface area in the frontal operculum was significantly associated with an increased risk of developing chronic pain: BA atlas area 44 (T=-4.10, p=4.24 × 10-5), Desikan atlas pars opercularis (T=-4.21, p=2.55 × 10-5), and DKT atlas pars opercularis (T=-3.96, p=7.47 × 10-5). Subsequent MR analysis further demonstrated a causally protective effect of larger cortical area in the prefrontal operculum against the risk of developing chronic pain (OR = 0.91, p=1.91 × 10-2). These results indicate a critical role of the surface area of frontal operculum in individual chronic pain susceptibility and provide a potential risk predictor for chronic pain development.
{"title":"Reduced Cortical Surface Area in the Frontal Operculum as a Causal Risk Predictor for Chronic Pain.","authors":"Xiuzhi Wang, Yipeng Le, Xichen Wang, Yingchao Song, Qian Su, Xiaoxiao Xiao, Yifan Li, Wen Qin, Chunshui Yu, Meng Liang","doi":"10.1155/prm/4687197","DOIUrl":"10.1155/prm/4687197","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic pain is a prevalent and debilitating condition that imposes substantial personal and societal burdens. Despite its significance, the neural mechanisms underlying individual susceptibility to chronic pain remain inadequately understood. In this study, we examined the prospective associations between 1325 brain structural imaging phenotypes and the future risk of developing chronic pain in a UK Biobank cohort of 5754-5756 participants. These phenotypes encompassed regional and tissue volume, cortical surface area and thickness. General linear models (GLMs) were employed to identify brain structural variations associated with the risk of developing chronic pain, and then Mendelian randomization (MR) was employed to explore potential causal relationships between brain structure and chronic pain development. GLMs identified three significant associations between imaging phenotypes and the future development of chronic pain. All three imaging phenotypes pertained to the cortical surface area of the frontal operculum, albeit derived from three different brain atlases. Specifically, reduced cortical surface area in the frontal operculum was significantly associated with an increased risk of developing chronic pain: BA atlas area 44 (<i>T</i>=-4.10, <i>p</i>=4.24 × 10<sup>-5</sup>), Desikan atlas pars opercularis (<i>T</i>=-4.21, <i>p</i>=2.55 × 10<sup>-5</sup>), and DKT atlas pars opercularis (<i>T</i>=-3.96, <i>p</i>=7.47 × 10<sup>-5</sup>). Subsequent MR analysis further demonstrated a causally protective effect of larger cortical area in the prefrontal operculum against the risk of developing chronic pain (OR = 0.91, <i>p</i>=1.91 × 10<sup>-2</sup>). These results indicate a critical role of the surface area of frontal operculum in individual chronic pain susceptibility and provide a potential risk predictor for chronic pain development.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2025 ","pages":"4687197"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12163224/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144302701","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: This study aimed to investigate differences in depression, anxiety and somatosensory amplification between fibromyalgia (FM) patients with and without type D personality (TDP) and healthy controls and to examine the mediating role of somatosensory amplification in the relationship between TDP and FM severity. Methods: A total of 159 participants were included in the cross-sectional case-control study and divided into three groups: FM patients with TDP (n = 56, mean age = 45.93 ± 11.01), FM patients without TDP (n = 48, mean age = 49.17 ± 11.18) and healthy controls (n = 55, mean age = 46.1 ± 9.64). Participants were assessed with the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ; administered only to FM patients), TDP Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory and Somatosensory Amplification Scale. Mediation analysis was performed to determine the mediating role of somatosensory amplification. Results: FM patients with TDP had significantly higher levels of depression, anxiety and somatosensory amplification compared to both FM patients without TDP and healthy controls (p < 0.001). Correlation analyses showed strong positive associations between TDP and anxiety (r = 0.729, p < 0.001) and depression (r = 0.794, p < 0.001). Somatosensory amplification was found to have a significant mediating role in the relationship between TDP and FM severity (b = 0.084, 95% CI = 0.018-0.172, p < 0.05). Conclusion: These results highlight TDP as an important psychological risk factor associated with increased depression, anxiety, and somatosensory amplification in FM patients. The apparent mediating role of somatosensory amplification suggests that addressing this mechanism and psychological stress with targeted psychosocial interventions may improve the efficacy of FM treatment.
目的:探讨伴有和不伴有D型人格(TDP)的纤维肌痛(FM)患者与健康对照者在抑郁、焦虑和躯体感觉放大方面的差异,并探讨躯体感觉放大在TDP与FM严重程度之间的中介作用。方法:将159例患者纳入横断面病例对照研究,分为伴有TDP的FM患者(n = 56,平均年龄为45.93±11.01)、无TDP的FM患者(n = 48,平均年龄为49.17±11.18)和健康对照组(n = 55,平均年龄为46.1±9.64)。通过纤维肌痛影响问卷(FIQ;(仅适用于FM患者)、TDP量表、Beck抑郁量表、Beck焦虑量表和躯体感觉放大量表。通过中介分析来确定体感放大的中介作用。结果:伴TDP的FM患者抑郁、焦虑和体感放大水平明显高于无TDP的FM患者和健康对照(p < 0.001)。相关分析显示,TDP与焦虑(r = 0.729, p < 0.001)和抑郁(r = 0.794, p < 0.001)呈正相关。体感放大在TDP和FM严重程度之间具有显著的中介作用(b = 0.084, 95% CI = 0.018-0.172, p < 0.05)。结论:这些结果强调TDP是一个重要的心理危险因素,与FM患者抑郁、焦虑和体感放大增加有关。躯体感觉放大的明显中介作用表明,通过有针对性的社会心理干预来解决这一机制和心理应激可能会提高FM治疗的疗效。
{"title":"Investigation of the Relationship Between Type D Personality and Depression, Anxiety and Somatosensory Amplification in Patients With Fibromyalgia.","authors":"Meltem Hazel Şimşek, Ulaş Korkmaz, Fatma Gül Helvacı Çelik, Nurçe Çilesizoğlu Yavuz, Çiçek Hocaoğlu","doi":"10.1155/prm/5315083","DOIUrl":"10.1155/prm/5315083","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study aimed to investigate differences in depression, anxiety and somatosensory amplification between fibromyalgia (FM) patients with and without type D personality (TDP) and healthy controls and to examine the mediating role of somatosensory amplification in the relationship between TDP and FM severity. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 159 participants were included in the cross-sectional case-control study and divided into three groups: FM patients with TDP (<i>n</i> = 56, mean age = 45.93 ± 11.01), FM patients without TDP (<i>n</i> = 48, mean age = 49.17 ± 11.18) and healthy controls (<i>n</i> = 55, mean age = 46.1 ± 9.64). Participants were assessed with the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ; administered only to FM patients), TDP Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory and Somatosensory Amplification Scale. Mediation analysis was performed to determine the mediating role of somatosensory amplification. <b>Results:</b> FM patients with TDP had significantly higher levels of depression, anxiety and somatosensory amplification compared to both FM patients without TDP and healthy controls (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Correlation analyses showed strong positive associations between TDP and anxiety (<i>r</i> = 0.729, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and depression (<i>r</i> = 0.794, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Somatosensory amplification was found to have a significant mediating role in the relationship between TDP and FM severity (<i>b</i> = 0.084, 95% CI = 0.018-0.172, <i>p</i> < 0.05). <b>Conclusion:</b> These results highlight TDP as an important psychological risk factor associated with increased depression, anxiety, and somatosensory amplification in FM patients. The apparent mediating role of somatosensory amplification suggests that addressing this mechanism and psychological stress with targeted psychosocial interventions may improve the efficacy of FM treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2025 ","pages":"5315083"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12097857/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144128258","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-13eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1155/prm/8887391
Ashutosh Dash, Tapas Das
Radiosynovectomy (RSV) represents an advanced therapeutic modality in nuclear medicine, designed to treat chronic inflammatory joint disorders that are unresponsive to conventional therapies. This targeted approach involves the intra-articular administration of radioactive microparticles containing a β--emitting radionuclide, selectively eradicating the inflamed synovial membrane while preserving surrounding tissues. As a minimally invasive, nonsurgical procedure routinely performed in outpatient settings, RSV offers a compelling alternative to more invasive interventions. Over time, RSV has evolved significantly, transitioning from the empirical use of radiocolloids to the development of specialized agents tailored for different joint types. Advancements in this field continue to explore a variety of β--emitting radionuclides with unique emission characteristics, integrated into novel microparticles to improve both specificity and therapeutic efficacy. The selection of an optimal radionuclide hinges on critical nuclear and chemical properties, ensuring effective binding to microparticles and delivering favorable clinical outcomes. This review examines the evolution of RSV in joint disorder management, detailing its mechanisms of action, key factors influencing radionuclide and microparticle selection, and the methodologies involved in their development and production. Additionally, it provides an overview of commonly used radionuclides and microparticles, evaluating their effectiveness within the ever-evolving landscape of RSV.
{"title":"Radiation Synovectomy: An Enticing Treatment Option for Inflammatory Joint Pain.","authors":"Ashutosh Dash, Tapas Das","doi":"10.1155/prm/8887391","DOIUrl":"10.1155/prm/8887391","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Radiosynovectomy (RSV) represents an advanced therapeutic modality in nuclear medicine, designed to treat chronic inflammatory joint disorders that are unresponsive to conventional therapies. This targeted approach involves the intra-articular administration of radioactive microparticles containing a β<sup>-</sup>-emitting radionuclide, selectively eradicating the inflamed synovial membrane while preserving surrounding tissues. As a minimally invasive, nonsurgical procedure routinely performed in outpatient settings, RSV offers a compelling alternative to more invasive interventions. Over time, RSV has evolved significantly, transitioning from the empirical use of radiocolloids to the development of specialized agents tailored for different joint types. Advancements in this field continue to explore a variety of β<sup>-</sup>-emitting radionuclides with unique emission characteristics, integrated into novel microparticles to improve both specificity and therapeutic efficacy. The selection of an optimal radionuclide hinges on critical nuclear and chemical properties, ensuring effective binding to microparticles and delivering favorable clinical outcomes. This review examines the evolution of RSV in joint disorder management, detailing its mechanisms of action, key factors influencing radionuclide and microparticle selection, and the methodologies involved in their development and production. Additionally, it provides an overview of commonly used radionuclides and microparticles, evaluating their effectiveness within the ever-evolving landscape of RSV.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2025 ","pages":"8887391"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12092159/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144111551","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}