Pub Date : 2024-11-27DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.006
Richard A Sherman, Cecile B Evans
Clinical issue: Psychophysiological assessments and biofeedback-based interventions for chronic for chronic pain can be highly effective. The purpose of this clinical consultation was to provide an overview of the psychophysiological assessment process and present a primer on biofeedback for chronic pain. The biofeedback process was presented by a biofeedback content expert, with photos and diagrams.
Practice recommendations: Nurses advocate for non-pharmacological pain interventions. However, biofeedback is a practice that has been overlooked and underutilized in nursing. This clinical consultation is meant to educate clinical nurses on psychophysiological assessment and biofeedback for chronic pain.
{"title":"A Clinical Consult to Explain the Biofeedback Process.","authors":"Richard A Sherman, Cecile B Evans","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Clinical issue: </strong>Psychophysiological assessments and biofeedback-based interventions for chronic for chronic pain can be highly effective. The purpose of this clinical consultation was to provide an overview of the psychophysiological assessment process and present a primer on biofeedback for chronic pain. The biofeedback process was presented by a biofeedback content expert, with photos and diagrams.</p><p><strong>Practice recommendations: </strong>Nurses advocate for non-pharmacological pain interventions. However, biofeedback is a practice that has been overlooked and underutilized in nursing. This clinical consultation is meant to educate clinical nurses on psychophysiological assessment and biofeedback for chronic pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142751377","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objectives: Labor pain is a subjective phenomenon that varies based on women's expectations. To have a positive childbirth experience, laboring women should have pain relief based on their request. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the utilization of labor pain management and associated factors among obstetric caregivers in Ethiopia DATA SOURCES: Different electronic databases (i.e., PubMed, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL, DOAJ, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and CAB Abstracts) were searched for published studies, whereas Google Scholar and Google Search were used for unpublished studies.
Review/analysis methods: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used throughout this work. Duplicate results were removed using EndNote X8. Quality was assessed by the JBI tool. Stata 17 was used for analysis. A random effects model was used, and the results were presented using a forest plot. Heterogeneity and publication bias were evaluated using Cochran's Q test and I2 test.
Results: The pooled utilization of pharmacological pain management was 28% (95% CI [12, 43]), whereas the pooled estimate of nonpharmacological pain management was 43% (95% CI [37, 49]). Obstetric care provider attitude was positively associated with both pharmacological and nonpharmacological labor pain management (adjusted odds ratio = 1.73, 95% CI [1.20, 2.26], adjusted odds ratio = 2.94, 95% CI [2.01, 3.87], respectively).
Pub Date : 2024-11-26DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.016
Marian Wilson, Staja Booker, Anitha Saravanan, Navdeep Singh, Brian Pervis, Gloria Mahalage, Mitchell R Knisely
The American Society for Pain Management Nursing (ASPMN) upholds the principle that all persons with pain have equal rights to evidence-based, high quality pain assessment, management, and treatment. This practice recommendation's goals are to 1) summarize known pain-related disparities, inequities, and injustices among commonly marginalized and at risk groups, 2) offer recommendations to ascertain that just and equitable pain care is provided to all people, and 3) outline a call to action for all nurses to embrace diversity, equity, inclusion, and a sense of belonging in order to mitigate pain-related disparities, inequities, and injustices within clinical environments and the nursing profession. This paper provides background and rationale for the 2024 ASPMN position statement on disparities, inequities and injustices in people with pain.
{"title":"Disparities, Inequities, and Injustices in Populations With Pain: Nursing Recommendations Supporting ASPMN's 2024 Position Statement.","authors":"Marian Wilson, Staja Booker, Anitha Saravanan, Navdeep Singh, Brian Pervis, Gloria Mahalage, Mitchell R Knisely","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.016","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The American Society for Pain Management Nursing (ASPMN) upholds the principle that all persons with pain have equal rights to evidence-based, high quality pain assessment, management, and treatment. This practice recommendation's goals are to 1) summarize known pain-related disparities, inequities, and injustices among commonly marginalized and at risk groups, 2) offer recommendations to ascertain that just and equitable pain care is provided to all people, and 3) outline a call to action for all nurses to embrace diversity, equity, inclusion, and a sense of belonging in order to mitigate pain-related disparities, inequities, and injustices within clinical environments and the nursing profession. This paper provides background and rationale for the 2024 ASPMN position statement on disparities, inequities and injustices in people with pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142740126","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-25DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.018
Raewan Kim, Aekyung Kim
Background: Low back pain (LBP) in patients with spinal diseases significantly reduces quality of life by causing not only physical disability but also psychological issues. LBP has a high prevalence worldwide and imposes substantial economic and social burdens, making its management critically important.
Purpose: This study aimed to develop and validate a model explaining LBP management behavior in patients with spinal diseases based on Self-Determination Theory (SDT).
Design: The hypothetical model of this study was developed based on Deci and Ryan's SDT and a literature review.
Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted with 220 patients diagnosed with spinal diseases, such as herniated intervertebral disc and spinal stenosis, who were members of a self-help group in South Korea. The survey included a total of 95 items, covering general characteristics, LBP management behavior, healthcare provider's autonomy support (support for making decisions and acting independently), social support, internal health locus of control (belief in one's ability to manage health independently), basic psychological needs (autonomy, competence, relatedness), and autonomous motivation (motivation based on intrinsic values). Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling.
Results: Autonomous motivation showed a significant direct and total effect on LBP management behavior (β = 0.60, p < .001). Healthcare provider's autonomy support also had a significant direct (β = 0.20, p = .042) and total effect (β = 0.35, p = .003). Internal health locus of control and basic psychological needs had indirect effects on LBP management behavior (β = 0.18, p = .042; β = 0.33, p = .019), while social support did not show significant direct (β = 0.06, p = .840), indirect (β = 0.07, p = .733), or total effects (β = 0.12, p = .406) on LBP management behavior. These variables collectively explained 52.2% of the variance in LBP management behavior among patients with spinal diseases.
Conclusions: This study confirmed that autonomous motivation and healthcare provider's autonomy support significantly influence LBP management behaviors in patients with spinal disease. Additionally, internal health locus of control and basic psychological needs indirectly impacted these behaviors through autonomous motivation.
Clinical implications: The findings underscore the importance of developing programs that enhance patients' autonomous motivation and providing autonomy-supportive interventions by healthcare providers. By identifying patients' internal health locus of control tendencies and tailoring interventions to meet their psychological needs, healthcare professionals can provide effective support for sustained LBP management behavior in patients with spinal disease.
{"title":"A Structural Equation Model for Low Back Pain Management Behavior in Patients With Spinal Disease.","authors":"Raewan Kim, Aekyung Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low back pain (LBP) in patients with spinal diseases significantly reduces quality of life by causing not only physical disability but also psychological issues. LBP has a high prevalence worldwide and imposes substantial economic and social burdens, making its management critically important.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to develop and validate a model explaining LBP management behavior in patients with spinal diseases based on Self-Determination Theory (SDT).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The hypothetical model of this study was developed based on Deci and Ryan's SDT and a literature review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey was conducted with 220 patients diagnosed with spinal diseases, such as herniated intervertebral disc and spinal stenosis, who were members of a self-help group in South Korea. The survey included a total of 95 items, covering general characteristics, LBP management behavior, healthcare provider's autonomy support (support for making decisions and acting independently), social support, internal health locus of control (belief in one's ability to manage health independently), basic psychological needs (autonomy, competence, relatedness), and autonomous motivation (motivation based on intrinsic values). Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Autonomous motivation showed a significant direct and total effect on LBP management behavior (β = 0.60, p < .001). Healthcare provider's autonomy support also had a significant direct (β = 0.20, p = .042) and total effect (β = 0.35, p = .003). Internal health locus of control and basic psychological needs had indirect effects on LBP management behavior (β = 0.18, p = .042; β = 0.33, p = .019), while social support did not show significant direct (β = 0.06, p = .840), indirect (β = 0.07, p = .733), or total effects (β = 0.12, p = .406) on LBP management behavior. These variables collectively explained 52.2% of the variance in LBP management behavior among patients with spinal diseases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study confirmed that autonomous motivation and healthcare provider's autonomy support significantly influence LBP management behaviors in patients with spinal disease. Additionally, internal health locus of control and basic psychological needs indirectly impacted these behaviors through autonomous motivation.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>The findings underscore the importance of developing programs that enhance patients' autonomous motivation and providing autonomy-supportive interventions by healthcare providers. By identifying patients' internal health locus of control tendencies and tailoring interventions to meet their psychological needs, healthcare professionals can provide effective support for sustained LBP management behavior in patients with spinal disease.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142731805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-22DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.013
Cheryl A Krause-Parello, Juyoung Park, David Newman
Purpose: The purpose of this pilot study was to examine the preliminary efficacy of an 8-week qigong intervention in managing biopsychosocial outcomes in veterans with chronic low back pain (CLBP).
Design: The study design was a longitudinal randomized controlled trial (RCT).
Methods: Multimodal assessments (e.g., biomarkers and psychological and social measures) over multiple time points to assess the preliminary efficacy of an 8-week qigong intervention versus wait-list control group in veterans with CLBP.
Results: Participants in the qigong intervention group showed greater improvement in pain intensity (p = .047), pain interference (p = .040), pain-related disability (p = .027), and sleep disturbance (p = .002). Other psychosocial outcomes were nonsignificant. A statistically significant relationship between biological outcomes (pro-inflammatory cytokines) and psychosocial outcomes was identified (e.g., tumor necrosis factor [TNF] and physical function [p < .001], pain-related disability and IL 8 [p = .049], and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and IL 8 [p = .043]).
Conclusions: The results indicated that all pain-related outcomes (pain intensity, low back pain-related disability, and pain interference) and sleep disturbance decreased significantly in the qigong group compared to the control group.
Clinical implications: The combination of gentle, slow-paced movements, along with the focused mindfulness of qigong, may improve physiological and psychosocial health. Charged with this information, healthcare providers (e.g., nurses, physical therapists) should consider non-pharmacological interventions such as qigong for veterans with CLBP.
{"title":"Examining Preliminary Efficacy of a Qigong Intervention in Veterans with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.","authors":"Cheryl A Krause-Parello, Juyoung Park, David Newman","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this pilot study was to examine the preliminary efficacy of an 8-week qigong intervention in managing biopsychosocial outcomes in veterans with chronic low back pain (CLBP).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The study design was a longitudinal randomized controlled trial (RCT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multimodal assessments (e.g., biomarkers and psychological and social measures) over multiple time points to assess the preliminary efficacy of an 8-week qigong intervention versus wait-list control group in veterans with CLBP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants in the qigong intervention group showed greater improvement in pain intensity (p = .047), pain interference (p = .040), pain-related disability (p = .027), and sleep disturbance (p = .002). Other psychosocial outcomes were nonsignificant. A statistically significant relationship between biological outcomes (pro-inflammatory cytokines) and psychosocial outcomes was identified (e.g., tumor necrosis factor [TNF] and physical function [p < .001], pain-related disability and IL 8 [p = .049], and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and IL 8 [p = .043]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results indicated that all pain-related outcomes (pain intensity, low back pain-related disability, and pain interference) and sleep disturbance decreased significantly in the qigong group compared to the control group.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>The combination of gentle, slow-paced movements, along with the focused mindfulness of qigong, may improve physiological and psychosocial health. Charged with this information, healthcare providers (e.g., nurses, physical therapists) should consider non-pharmacological interventions such as qigong for veterans with CLBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142695769","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: To examine the effect of a self-efficacy-promoting program on pain management among patients with cancer.
Methods: A quasi-experimental design was carried out. Fifty-eight participants were recruited by using consecutive sampling and then divided, according to time period, into either the control group or the experimental group, 29 people for each group. Data collection was completed in the control group before starting it in the experimental group to prevent contamination of the experiment. The control group received standard care, whereas the experimental group received a self-efficacy-promoting program. The pain self-efficacy questionnaire was employed to examine patients' self-efficacy, while a numeric rating scale was utilized to evaluate pain levels.
Results: Compared to the control group, the participants in the experimental group had higher pain self-efficacy scores (p < .05) and lower pain levels (p < .05).
Conclusions: The self-efficacy-promoting program effectively improved patients' self-efficacy scores and pain levels. Therefore, the program should be applied in nursing to assist cancer patients with pain management.
Clinical implications: Pain is high prevalence among patients with cancer. Self-efficacy program can be used as a guide and framework for pain management among adult cancer patients in clinical care.
{"title":"Effect of a Self-Efficacy-Promoting Program on Pain Management Among Patients with Cancer: A Quasi-Experimental Study.","authors":"Jia Liu, Busaba Somjaivong, Ladawan Panpanit, LiFang Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine the effect of a self-efficacy-promoting program on pain management among patients with cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quasi-experimental design was carried out. Fifty-eight participants were recruited by using consecutive sampling and then divided, according to time period, into either the control group or the experimental group, 29 people for each group. Data collection was completed in the control group before starting it in the experimental group to prevent contamination of the experiment. The control group received standard care, whereas the experimental group received a self-efficacy-promoting program. The pain self-efficacy questionnaire was employed to examine patients' self-efficacy, while a numeric rating scale was utilized to evaluate pain levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the control group, the participants in the experimental group had higher pain self-efficacy scores (p < .05) and lower pain levels (p < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The self-efficacy-promoting program effectively improved patients' self-efficacy scores and pain levels. Therefore, the program should be applied in nursing to assist cancer patients with pain management.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Pain is high prevalence among patients with cancer. Self-efficacy program can be used as a guide and framework for pain management among adult cancer patients in clinical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142676656","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-14DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.014
Elizabeth A Byma
Objective: Managing pain continues to be a difficult issue worldwide. Pain management has ethical connotations, with the potential to result in moral distress in nurses. The aim of this concept analysis is to analyze moral distress in pain management.
Design: Walker and Avant's method of concept analysis was utilized to determine attributes, antecedents, and consequences of moral distress in pain management.
Methods: Literature searches in The Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Pub Med were performed. The search identified and utilized 16 articles in the concept analysis.
Results: Four major attributes of moral distress in pain management are discussed: (1) feeling of ownership of patient pain, (2) perceived powerlessness, (3) frustration, and (4) feelings of conflict between pain management situation, personal values, and professional values of nursing. Antecedents were patients experiencing pain, barriers, and having knowledge of the right thing to do. Consequences included nurse burnout, turnover and exit from the profession, compromised patient care, emotional withdrawal from patients, depersonalization of patients, and feelings of complicity and wrongdoing.
Conclusions: This concept analysis provides a foundation for future research examining moral distress in pain management.
目的:在全球范围内,疼痛管理仍然是一个棘手的问题。疼痛管理具有伦理内涵,有可能导致护士的道德困扰。本概念分析旨在分析疼痛管理中的道德困扰:设计:采用 Walker 和 Avant 的概念分析方法来确定疼痛管理中道德困扰的属性、前因和后果:方法:在《护理与专职医疗文献累积索引》(CINAHL)、MEDLINE、Web of Science 和 Pub Med 中进行文献检索。搜索确定并在概念分析中使用了 16 篇文章:讨论了疼痛管理中道德困扰的四个主要属性:(1)对患者疼痛的主人翁感;(2)感知到的无力感;(3)挫败感;(4)疼痛管理情况、个人价值观和护理专业价值观之间的冲突感。前因包括患者的疼痛经历、障碍以及对正确做法的了解。后果包括护士职业倦怠、离职和退出护理行业、患者护理受损、情感上远离患者、患者人格解体以及共谋和错误行为感:这一概念分析为今后研究疼痛管理中的道德困扰奠定了基础。
{"title":"Concept Analysis of Moral Distress in Pain Management.","authors":"Elizabeth A Byma","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Managing pain continues to be a difficult issue worldwide. Pain management has ethical connotations, with the potential to result in moral distress in nurses. The aim of this concept analysis is to analyze moral distress in pain management.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Walker and Avant's method of concept analysis was utilized to determine attributes, antecedents, and consequences of moral distress in pain management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literature searches in The Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Pub Med were performed. The search identified and utilized 16 articles in the concept analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four major attributes of moral distress in pain management are discussed: (1) feeling of ownership of patient pain, (2) perceived powerlessness, (3) frustration, and (4) feelings of conflict between pain management situation, personal values, and professional values of nursing. Antecedents were patients experiencing pain, barriers, and having knowledge of the right thing to do. Consequences included nurse burnout, turnover and exit from the profession, compromised patient care, emotional withdrawal from patients, depersonalization of patients, and feelings of complicity and wrongdoing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This concept analysis provides a foundation for future research examining moral distress in pain management.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142639414","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-13DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.012
Jo McDonall, Jessica Wilson, Mari Botti, Anastasia Hutchinson
Purpose: Recovery following cardiac surgery via sternotomy involves weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation, maintaining hemodynamic stability, and preventing complications. In the early postoperative period, a key priority is adequate pain control to allow patients to actively participate in exercise. The purpose of this study was to (i) describe analgesic prescribing and administration practices following cardiac surgery via sternotomy and (ii) explore patients' pain experience and how this impacted participation in early postoperative care.
Methods: This research project was a pilot descriptive exploratory study using multiple methods and conducted within a single site. A medical record chart audit was performed to obtain details of prescribed and administered multimodal analgesics and pain intensity scores over the first 3 days following surgery. Semi-structured interviews and responses to validated questionnaires were obtained from 20 postoperative patients on days 3-4 following cardiac surgery to determine pain experience and the impact of pain on participation in recovery.
Results: Patients had a varied experience of pain intensity during their recovery. A total of 19 patients (95%) received 100% of their fixed daily dose of analgesics, but only 22% of available as needed opioids were administered on day 1 and only 12% were administered on day 2. Many patients experienced higher levels of pain at both rest and movement in the 24 hours prior to interview than were recorded in their medical records.
Conclusions: Patients can experience significant pain following major cardiac surgery, and this pain can hinder their ability to participate in important activities, such as deep breathing and coughing and mobilizing, that are central to their recovery. Gaps in the management of breakthrough pain in the early postoperative period were identified. To promote optimal recovery following cardiac surgery, nurses need to assess pain at both rest and movement and administer effective doses of as needed analgesia to manage the occurrence of breakthrough pain. Additionally, patients need to be more informed to understand the link between well controlled pain and their ability to participate in their recovery.
Clinical implications: To promote optimal recovery following cardiac surgery, nurses need to assess pain at both rest and movement and administer effective doses of as needed analgesia to manage the occurrence of breakthrough pain. Additionally, patients need to be more informed to understand the link between well controlled pain and their ability to participate in their recovery.
{"title":"Patient Experience of Pain Management Following Cardiac Surgery: A Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Jo McDonall, Jessica Wilson, Mari Botti, Anastasia Hutchinson","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Recovery following cardiac surgery via sternotomy involves weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation, maintaining hemodynamic stability, and preventing complications. In the early postoperative period, a key priority is adequate pain control to allow patients to actively participate in exercise. The purpose of this study was to (i) describe analgesic prescribing and administration practices following cardiac surgery via sternotomy and (ii) explore patients' pain experience and how this impacted participation in early postoperative care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This research project was a pilot descriptive exploratory study using multiple methods and conducted within a single site. A medical record chart audit was performed to obtain details of prescribed and administered multimodal analgesics and pain intensity scores over the first 3 days following surgery. Semi-structured interviews and responses to validated questionnaires were obtained from 20 postoperative patients on days 3-4 following cardiac surgery to determine pain experience and the impact of pain on participation in recovery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients had a varied experience of pain intensity during their recovery. A total of 19 patients (95%) received 100% of their fixed daily dose of analgesics, but only 22% of available as needed opioids were administered on day 1 and only 12% were administered on day 2. Many patients experienced higher levels of pain at both rest and movement in the 24 hours prior to interview than were recorded in their medical records.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients can experience significant pain following major cardiac surgery, and this pain can hinder their ability to participate in important activities, such as deep breathing and coughing and mobilizing, that are central to their recovery. Gaps in the management of breakthrough pain in the early postoperative period were identified. To promote optimal recovery following cardiac surgery, nurses need to assess pain at both rest and movement and administer effective doses of as needed analgesia to manage the occurrence of breakthrough pain. Additionally, patients need to be more informed to understand the link between well controlled pain and their ability to participate in their recovery.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>To promote optimal recovery following cardiac surgery, nurses need to assess pain at both rest and movement and administer effective doses of as needed analgesia to manage the occurrence of breakthrough pain. Additionally, patients need to be more informed to understand the link between well controlled pain and their ability to participate in their recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142625470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-12DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.004
Sevil Günaydın, Ebru Şen, Tülay Yılmaz, Hüsniye Dinç Kaya
Background: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a noninvasive, safe electrophysical pain relief method during childbirth.
Aim: This study was carried out to reveal information about the effectiveness of TENS, which is used to relieve labor pain.
Methods: Inspired by Whittemore and Knafl, we conducted an integrative literature review, including the five key stages of problem identification, literature search, data evaluation, data analysis, and presentation of results. This integrative review was performed between February 27 and March 30, 2023, using the Google Scholar, PubMed, and ScienceDirect databases. The search was made over Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa internet access network using the English keywords such as (birth OR labor OR labor pain OR birth pain) AND (women OR pregnant women OR pregnancy) AND (transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation OR TENS OR nonpharmacological). The checklist developed by Joanna Briggs Institute was used to examine the methodological quality of studies.
Results: Eleven articles were included in this study. The total number of samples included in the research is 1,576. The Visual Analog Scale was used to assess labor pain in 9 of the 11 studies included in the research. In all studies, high-frequency TENS (at frequencies of 15-100 Hz) was used in the active phase of labor. It is seen that the TENS intervention was more effective in studies comparing it with control, placebo, lavender, and water immersion at cervical dilatation at 6 cm groups.
Conclusion: In studies evaluating the effectiveness of TENS, it has been found to be an effective method in relieving labor pain.
{"title":"Use of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in Labor Pain: An Integrative Review.","authors":"Sevil Günaydın, Ebru Şen, Tülay Yılmaz, Hüsniye Dinç Kaya","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a noninvasive, safe electrophysical pain relief method during childbirth.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study was carried out to reveal information about the effectiveness of TENS, which is used to relieve labor pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Inspired by Whittemore and Knafl, we conducted an integrative literature review, including the five key stages of problem identification, literature search, data evaluation, data analysis, and presentation of results. This integrative review was performed between February 27 and March 30, 2023, using the Google Scholar, PubMed, and ScienceDirect databases. The search was made over Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa internet access network using the English keywords such as (birth OR labor OR labor pain OR birth pain) AND (women OR pregnant women OR pregnancy) AND (transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation OR TENS OR nonpharmacological). The checklist developed by Joanna Briggs Institute was used to examine the methodological quality of studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven articles were included in this study. The total number of samples included in the research is 1,576. The Visual Analog Scale was used to assess labor pain in 9 of the 11 studies included in the research. In all studies, high-frequency TENS (at frequencies of 15-100 Hz) was used in the active phase of labor. It is seen that the TENS intervention was more effective in studies comparing it with control, placebo, lavender, and water immersion at cervical dilatation at 6 cm groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In studies evaluating the effectiveness of TENS, it has been found to be an effective method in relieving labor pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142625519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-12DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.015
Mitchell R Knisely, Staja Q Booker, Anitha Saravanan, Navdeep Singh, Brian Pervis, Gloria Mahalage, Marian Wilson
Disparities, inequities, and injustices in populations with pain are historically pervasive and lead to deleterious patient outcomes and perpetuate systemic barriers to achieving equitable pain management. The American Society for Pain Management Nursing (ASPMN) upholds the principle that all persons with pain have equal rights to evidence-based, high quality pain assessment, management, and treatment. Intervening at multilevels (i.e., individual, interpersonal, community, societal) is necessary to ascertain that just and equitable pain care is provided to all populations.
{"title":"Disparities, Inequities, and Injustices in Populations With Pain: An ASPMN Position Statement.","authors":"Mitchell R Knisely, Staja Q Booker, Anitha Saravanan, Navdeep Singh, Brian Pervis, Gloria Mahalage, Marian Wilson","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.015","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Disparities, inequities, and injustices in populations with pain are historically pervasive and lead to deleterious patient outcomes and perpetuate systemic barriers to achieving equitable pain management. The American Society for Pain Management Nursing (ASPMN) upholds the principle that all persons with pain have equal rights to evidence-based, high quality pain assessment, management, and treatment. Intervening at multilevels (i.e., individual, interpersonal, community, societal) is necessary to ascertain that just and equitable pain care is provided to all populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142625371","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}