首页 > 最新文献

Pain Management Nursing最新文献

英文 中文
A Clinical Consult to Explain the Biofeedback Process. 解释生物反馈过程的临床咨询。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.006
Richard A Sherman, Cecile B Evans

Clinical issue: Psychophysiological assessments and biofeedback-based interventions for chronic for chronic pain can be highly effective. The purpose of this clinical consultation was to provide an overview of the psychophysiological assessment process and present a primer on biofeedback for chronic pain. The biofeedback process was presented by a biofeedback content expert, with photos and diagrams.

Practice recommendations: Nurses advocate for non-pharmacological pain interventions. However, biofeedback is a practice that has been overlooked and underutilized in nursing. This clinical consultation is meant to educate clinical nurses on psychophysiological assessment and biofeedback for chronic pain.

临床问题:心理生理评估和基于生物反馈的慢性疼痛干预是非常有效的。本次临床会诊的目的是提供心理生理评估过程的概述,并介绍慢性疼痛的生物反馈入门。生物反馈过程由生物反馈内容专家介绍,并附有照片和图表。实践建议:护士提倡非药物疼痛干预。然而,生物反馈是一种在护理中被忽视和未充分利用的实践。本临床会诊旨在教育临床护士对慢性疼痛的心理生理评估和生物反馈。
{"title":"A Clinical Consult to Explain the Biofeedback Process.","authors":"Richard A Sherman, Cecile B Evans","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Clinical issue: </strong>Psychophysiological assessments and biofeedback-based interventions for chronic for chronic pain can be highly effective. The purpose of this clinical consultation was to provide an overview of the psychophysiological assessment process and present a primer on biofeedback for chronic pain. The biofeedback process was presented by a biofeedback content expert, with photos and diagrams.</p><p><strong>Practice recommendations: </strong>Nurses advocate for non-pharmacological pain interventions. However, biofeedback is a practice that has been overlooked and underutilized in nursing. This clinical consultation is meant to educate clinical nurses on psychophysiological assessment and biofeedback for chronic pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142751377","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Labor Pain Management in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 埃塞俄比亚的分娩疼痛管理:系统回顾与元分析》。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.008
Abraham Negash, Tamirat Getachew, Lemma Demissie Regassa, Alemayehu Deressa, Abera Cheru, Usmael Jibro, Bikila Balis, Addisu Sertsu, Dureti Abdurhaman, Kabtamu Nigussie, Fethia Mohammed, Eptisam Mohammed, Ibsa Mussa

Objectives: Labor pain is a subjective phenomenon that varies based on women's expectations. To have a positive childbirth experience, laboring women should have pain relief based on their request. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the utilization of labor pain management and associated factors among obstetric caregivers in Ethiopia DATA SOURCES: Different electronic databases (i.e., PubMed, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL, DOAJ, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and CAB Abstracts) were searched for published studies, whereas Google Scholar and Google Search were used for unpublished studies.

Review/analysis methods: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used throughout this work. Duplicate results were removed using EndNote X8. Quality was assessed by the JBI tool. Stata 17 was used for analysis. A random effects model was used, and the results were presented using a forest plot. Heterogeneity and publication bias were evaluated using Cochran's Q test and I2 test.

Results: The pooled utilization of pharmacological pain management was 28% (95% CI [12, 43]), whereas the pooled estimate of nonpharmacological pain management was 43% (95% CI [37, 49]). Obstetric care provider attitude was positively associated with both pharmacological and nonpharmacological labor pain management (adjusted odds ratio = 1.73, 95% CI [1.20, 2.26], adjusted odds ratio = 2.94, 95% CI [2.01, 3.87], respectively).

Conclusions: Labor pain management utilization among obstetric care providers in Ethiopia was poor. Health care provider attitude was positively associated with labor pain management. On-site training was recommended for obstetric care providers to improve the practice of labor pain management. © 20XX by the American Society for Pain Management Nursing.

目的:分娩疼痛是一种主观现象,因产妇的期望而异。为了获得积极的分娩体验,产妇应根据自己的要求减轻疼痛。因此,本研究旨在确定埃塞俄比亚产科护理人员对分娩镇痛的使用情况及相关因素:搜索了不同的电子数据库(即 PubMed、Scopus、Embase、CINAHL、DOAJ、Web of Science、MEDLINE、Cochrane Library、ScienceDirect 和 CAB Abstracts)以获取已发表的研究,而 Google Scholar 和 Google Search 则用于获取未发表的研究:综述/分析方法:全程采用《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》指南。使用 EndNote X8 删除重复结果。质量由 JBI 工具评估。使用 Stata 17 进行分析。采用随机效应模型,并以森林图展示结果。使用Cochran's Q检验和I2检验评估异质性和发表偏倚:药物止痛的总利用率为 28%(95% CI [12,43]),而非药物止痛的总利用率为 43%(95% CI [37,49])。产科护理人员的态度与药物和非药物分娩镇痛均呈正相关(调整后的几率比=1.73,95% CI [1.20,2.26];调整后的几率比=2.94,95% CI [2.01,3.87]):埃塞俄比亚产科医护人员对分娩镇痛的利用率很低。医疗服务提供者的态度与分娩镇痛管理呈正相关。建议对产科医护人员进行现场培训,以改善分娩镇痛的实践。©20XX年美国疼痛管理护理学会。
{"title":"Labor Pain Management in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Abraham Negash, Tamirat Getachew, Lemma Demissie Regassa, Alemayehu Deressa, Abera Cheru, Usmael Jibro, Bikila Balis, Addisu Sertsu, Dureti Abdurhaman, Kabtamu Nigussie, Fethia Mohammed, Eptisam Mohammed, Ibsa Mussa","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Labor pain is a subjective phenomenon that varies based on women's expectations. To have a positive childbirth experience, laboring women should have pain relief based on their request. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the utilization of labor pain management and associated factors among obstetric caregivers in Ethiopia DATA SOURCES: Different electronic databases (i.e., PubMed, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL, DOAJ, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and CAB Abstracts) were searched for published studies, whereas Google Scholar and Google Search were used for unpublished studies.</p><p><strong>Review/analysis methods: </strong>Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used throughout this work. Duplicate results were removed using EndNote X8. Quality was assessed by the JBI tool. Stata 17 was used for analysis. A random effects model was used, and the results were presented using a forest plot. Heterogeneity and publication bias were evaluated using Cochran's Q test and I<sup>2</sup> test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pooled utilization of pharmacological pain management was 28% (95% CI [12, 43]), whereas the pooled estimate of nonpharmacological pain management was 43% (95% CI [37, 49]). Obstetric care provider attitude was positively associated with both pharmacological and nonpharmacological labor pain management (adjusted odds ratio = 1.73, 95% CI [1.20, 2.26], adjusted odds ratio = 2.94, 95% CI [2.01, 3.87], respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Labor pain management utilization among obstetric care providers in Ethiopia was poor. Health care provider attitude was positively associated with labor pain management. On-site training was recommended for obstetric care providers to improve the practice of labor pain management. © 20XX by the American Society for Pain Management Nursing.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142740130","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Disparities, Inequities, and Injustices in Populations With Pain: Nursing Recommendations Supporting ASPMN's 2024 Position Statement. 疼痛人群中的差异、不公平和不公正:支持 ASPMN 2024 年立场声明的护理建议》。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.016
Marian Wilson, Staja Booker, Anitha Saravanan, Navdeep Singh, Brian Pervis, Gloria Mahalage, Mitchell R Knisely

The American Society for Pain Management Nursing (ASPMN) upholds the principle that all persons with pain have equal rights to evidence-based, high quality pain assessment, management, and treatment. This practice recommendation's goals are to 1) summarize known pain-related disparities, inequities, and injustices among commonly marginalized and at risk groups, 2) offer recommendations to ascertain that just and equitable pain care is provided to all people, and 3) outline a call to action for all nurses to embrace diversity, equity, inclusion, and a sense of belonging in order to mitigate pain-related disparities, inequities, and injustices within clinical environments and the nursing profession. This paper provides background and rationale for the 2024 ASPMN position statement on disparities, inequities and injustices in people with pain.

美国疼痛管理护理学会(ASPMN)坚持的原则是,所有疼痛患者都有平等的权利接受循证、高质量的疼痛评估、管理和治疗。本实践建议的目标是:1)总结常见边缘化群体和高危群体中已知的与疼痛相关的差异、不公平和不公正现象;2)提出建议,以确保为所有人提供公正和公平的疼痛护理;3)概述对所有护士的行动呼吁,以拥抱多样性、公平、包容和归属感,从而减轻临床环境和护理专业中与疼痛相关的差异、不公平和不公正现象。本文提供了 2024 年 ASPMN 关于疼痛患者的差异、不公平和不公正的立场声明的背景和依据。
{"title":"Disparities, Inequities, and Injustices in Populations With Pain: Nursing Recommendations Supporting ASPMN's 2024 Position Statement.","authors":"Marian Wilson, Staja Booker, Anitha Saravanan, Navdeep Singh, Brian Pervis, Gloria Mahalage, Mitchell R Knisely","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.016","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The American Society for Pain Management Nursing (ASPMN) upholds the principle that all persons with pain have equal rights to evidence-based, high quality pain assessment, management, and treatment. This practice recommendation's goals are to 1) summarize known pain-related disparities, inequities, and injustices among commonly marginalized and at risk groups, 2) offer recommendations to ascertain that just and equitable pain care is provided to all people, and 3) outline a call to action for all nurses to embrace diversity, equity, inclusion, and a sense of belonging in order to mitigate pain-related disparities, inequities, and injustices within clinical environments and the nursing profession. This paper provides background and rationale for the 2024 ASPMN position statement on disparities, inequities and injustices in people with pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142740126","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Structural Equation Model for Low Back Pain Management Behavior in Patients With Spinal Disease. 脊柱疾病患者腰痛管理行为的结构方程模型
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.018
Raewan Kim, Aekyung Kim

Background: Low back pain (LBP) in patients with spinal diseases significantly reduces quality of life by causing not only physical disability but also psychological issues. LBP has a high prevalence worldwide and imposes substantial economic and social burdens, making its management critically important.

Purpose: This study aimed to develop and validate a model explaining LBP management behavior in patients with spinal diseases based on Self-Determination Theory (SDT).

Design: The hypothetical model of this study was developed based on Deci and Ryan's SDT and a literature review.

Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted with 220 patients diagnosed with spinal diseases, such as herniated intervertebral disc and spinal stenosis, who were members of a self-help group in South Korea. The survey included a total of 95 items, covering general characteristics, LBP management behavior, healthcare provider's autonomy support (support for making decisions and acting independently), social support, internal health locus of control (belief in one's ability to manage health independently), basic psychological needs (autonomy, competence, relatedness), and autonomous motivation (motivation based on intrinsic values). Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling.

Results: Autonomous motivation showed a significant direct and total effect on LBP management behavior (β = 0.60, p < .001). Healthcare provider's autonomy support also had a significant direct (β = 0.20, p = .042) and total effect (β = 0.35, p = .003). Internal health locus of control and basic psychological needs had indirect effects on LBP management behavior (β = 0.18, p = .042; β = 0.33, p = .019), while social support did not show significant direct (β = 0.06, p = .840), indirect (β = 0.07, p = .733), or total effects (β = 0.12, p = .406) on LBP management behavior. These variables collectively explained 52.2% of the variance in LBP management behavior among patients with spinal diseases.

Conclusions: This study confirmed that autonomous motivation and healthcare provider's autonomy support significantly influence LBP management behaviors in patients with spinal disease. Additionally, internal health locus of control and basic psychological needs indirectly impacted these behaviors through autonomous motivation.

Clinical implications: The findings underscore the importance of developing programs that enhance patients' autonomous motivation and providing autonomy-supportive interventions by healthcare providers. By identifying patients' internal health locus of control tendencies and tailoring interventions to meet their psychological needs, healthcare professionals can provide effective support for sustained LBP management behavior in patients with spinal disease.

Registration: None.

背景:脊柱疾病患者的腰背痛(LBP)不仅会导致身体残疾,还会引起心理问题,从而大大降低生活质量。目的:本研究旨在根据自我决定理论(SDT)建立并验证一个解释脊柱疾病患者腰背痛管理行为的模型:本研究的假设模型是根据 Deci 和 Ryan 的 SDT 以及文献综述建立的:对 220 名被诊断患有椎间盘突出症和椎管狭窄症等脊柱疾病的韩国自助小组成员进行了横断面在线调查。调查共包括 95 个条目,涵盖了一般特征、枸杞多糖症管理行为、医疗服务提供者的自主支持(对做出决定和独立行动的支持)、社会支持、内部健康控制点(相信自己有能力独立管理健康)、基本心理需求(自主性、能力、相关性)和自主动机(基于内在价值的动机)。数据采用结构方程模型进行分析:自主动机对枸杞多糖症管理行为有显著的直接和总体影响(β = 0.60,p < .001)。医疗服务提供者的自主支持也有显著的直接效应(β = 0.20,p = .042)和总效应(β = 0.35,p = .003)。内部健康控制定位和基本心理需求对枸杞多糖管理行为有间接影响(β = 0.18,p = .042;β = 0.33,p = .019),而社会支持对枸杞多糖管理行为的直接影响(β = 0.06,p = .840)、间接影响(β = 0.07,p = .733)和总影响(β = 0.12,p = .406)均不明显。这些变量共同解释了脊柱疾病患者枸杞多糖管理行为52.2%的变异:本研究证实,自主动机和医护人员的自主支持对脊柱疾病患者的枸杞多糖管理行为有显著影响。此外,内部健康控制点和基本心理需求也会通过自主动机间接影响这些行为:研究结果强调了医疗服务提供者制定提高患者自主动机的计划并提供自主支持性干预的重要性。通过识别患者的内部健康控制倾向,并根据他们的心理需求调整干预措施,医护人员可以为脊柱疾病患者的持续LBP管理行为提供有效支持:注册:无。
{"title":"A Structural Equation Model for Low Back Pain Management Behavior in Patients With Spinal Disease.","authors":"Raewan Kim, Aekyung Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low back pain (LBP) in patients with spinal diseases significantly reduces quality of life by causing not only physical disability but also psychological issues. LBP has a high prevalence worldwide and imposes substantial economic and social burdens, making its management critically important.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to develop and validate a model explaining LBP management behavior in patients with spinal diseases based on Self-Determination Theory (SDT).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The hypothetical model of this study was developed based on Deci and Ryan's SDT and a literature review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey was conducted with 220 patients diagnosed with spinal diseases, such as herniated intervertebral disc and spinal stenosis, who were members of a self-help group in South Korea. The survey included a total of 95 items, covering general characteristics, LBP management behavior, healthcare provider's autonomy support (support for making decisions and acting independently), social support, internal health locus of control (belief in one's ability to manage health independently), basic psychological needs (autonomy, competence, relatedness), and autonomous motivation (motivation based on intrinsic values). Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Autonomous motivation showed a significant direct and total effect on LBP management behavior (β = 0.60, p < .001). Healthcare provider's autonomy support also had a significant direct (β = 0.20, p = .042) and total effect (β = 0.35, p = .003). Internal health locus of control and basic psychological needs had indirect effects on LBP management behavior (β = 0.18, p = .042; β = 0.33, p = .019), while social support did not show significant direct (β = 0.06, p = .840), indirect (β = 0.07, p = .733), or total effects (β = 0.12, p = .406) on LBP management behavior. These variables collectively explained 52.2% of the variance in LBP management behavior among patients with spinal diseases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study confirmed that autonomous motivation and healthcare provider's autonomy support significantly influence LBP management behaviors in patients with spinal disease. Additionally, internal health locus of control and basic psychological needs indirectly impacted these behaviors through autonomous motivation.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>The findings underscore the importance of developing programs that enhance patients' autonomous motivation and providing autonomy-supportive interventions by healthcare providers. By identifying patients' internal health locus of control tendencies and tailoring interventions to meet their psychological needs, healthcare professionals can provide effective support for sustained LBP management behavior in patients with spinal disease.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142731805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Examining Preliminary Efficacy of a Qigong Intervention in Veterans with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study. 检验气功干预对慢性腰痛退伍军人的初步疗效:随机对照试点研究。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.013
Cheryl A Krause-Parello, Juyoung Park, David Newman

Purpose: The purpose of this pilot study was to examine the preliminary efficacy of an 8-week qigong intervention in managing biopsychosocial outcomes in veterans with chronic low back pain (CLBP).

Design: The study design was a longitudinal randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Methods: Multimodal assessments (e.g., biomarkers and psychological and social measures) over multiple time points to assess the preliminary efficacy of an 8-week qigong intervention versus wait-list control group in veterans with CLBP.

Results: Participants in the qigong intervention group showed greater improvement in pain intensity (p = .047), pain interference (p = .040), pain-related disability (p = .027), and sleep disturbance (p = .002). Other psychosocial outcomes were nonsignificant. A statistically significant relationship between biological outcomes (pro-inflammatory cytokines) and psychosocial outcomes was identified (e.g., tumor necrosis factor [TNF] and physical function [p < .001], pain-related disability and IL 8 [p = .049], and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and IL 8 [p = .043]).

Conclusions: The results indicated that all pain-related outcomes (pain intensity, low back pain-related disability, and pain interference) and sleep disturbance decreased significantly in the qigong group compared to the control group.

Clinical implications: The combination of gentle, slow-paced movements, along with the focused mindfulness of qigong, may improve physiological and psychosocial health. Charged with this information, healthcare providers (e.g., nurses, physical therapists) should consider non-pharmacological interventions such as qigong for veterans with CLBP.

目的:本试验性研究旨在考察为期8周的气功干预对慢性腰背痛(CLBP)退伍军人的生物心理社会结果管理的初步疗效:研究设计为纵向随机对照试验(RCT):方法:在多个时间点进行多模式评估(如生物标志物、心理和社会测量),以评估对慢性腰背痛退伍军人进行为期8周的气功干预与等待对照组的初步疗效:结果:气功干预组的参与者在疼痛强度(p = .047)、疼痛干扰(p = .040)、疼痛相关残疾(p = .027)和睡眠障碍(p = .002)方面均有较大改善。其他社会心理结果无显著性差异。生物学结果(促炎细胞因子)与社会心理结果之间存在统计学意义上的显著关系(例如,肿瘤坏死因子[TNF]与身体功能[p < .001],疼痛相关残疾与 IL 8 [p = .049],创伤后应激障碍症状与 IL 8 [p = .043]):结论:结果表明,与对照组相比,气功组所有与疼痛相关的结果(疼痛强度、腰背痛相关残疾和疼痛干扰)和睡眠障碍都明显减少:临床意义:轻柔、慢节奏的动作与气功专注的意念相结合,可改善生理和心理健康。医疗服务提供者(如护士、理疗师等)应考虑对患有慢性前列腺炎的退伍军人采取气功等非药物干预措施。
{"title":"Examining Preliminary Efficacy of a Qigong Intervention in Veterans with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.","authors":"Cheryl A Krause-Parello, Juyoung Park, David Newman","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this pilot study was to examine the preliminary efficacy of an 8-week qigong intervention in managing biopsychosocial outcomes in veterans with chronic low back pain (CLBP).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The study design was a longitudinal randomized controlled trial (RCT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multimodal assessments (e.g., biomarkers and psychological and social measures) over multiple time points to assess the preliminary efficacy of an 8-week qigong intervention versus wait-list control group in veterans with CLBP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants in the qigong intervention group showed greater improvement in pain intensity (p = .047), pain interference (p = .040), pain-related disability (p = .027), and sleep disturbance (p = .002). Other psychosocial outcomes were nonsignificant. A statistically significant relationship between biological outcomes (pro-inflammatory cytokines) and psychosocial outcomes was identified (e.g., tumor necrosis factor [TNF] and physical function [p < .001], pain-related disability and IL 8 [p = .049], and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and IL 8 [p = .043]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results indicated that all pain-related outcomes (pain intensity, low back pain-related disability, and pain interference) and sleep disturbance decreased significantly in the qigong group compared to the control group.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>The combination of gentle, slow-paced movements, along with the focused mindfulness of qigong, may improve physiological and psychosocial health. Charged with this information, healthcare providers (e.g., nurses, physical therapists) should consider non-pharmacological interventions such as qigong for veterans with CLBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142695769","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of a Self-Efficacy-Promoting Program on Pain Management Among Patients with Cancer: A Quasi-Experimental Study. 自我效能促进计划对癌症患者疼痛管理的影响:准实验研究
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.009
Jia Liu, Busaba Somjaivong, Ladawan Panpanit, LiFang Zhang

Purpose: To examine the effect of a self-efficacy-promoting program on pain management among patients with cancer.

Methods: A quasi-experimental design was carried out. Fifty-eight participants were recruited by using consecutive sampling and then divided, according to time period, into either the control group or the experimental group, 29 people for each group. Data collection was completed in the control group before starting it in the experimental group to prevent contamination of the experiment. The control group received standard care, whereas the experimental group received a self-efficacy-promoting program. The pain self-efficacy questionnaire was employed to examine patients' self-efficacy, while a numeric rating scale was utilized to evaluate pain levels.

Results: Compared to the control group, the participants in the experimental group had higher pain self-efficacy scores (p < .05) and lower pain levels (p < .05).

Conclusions: The self-efficacy-promoting program effectively improved patients' self-efficacy scores and pain levels. Therefore, the program should be applied in nursing to assist cancer patients with pain management.

Clinical implications: Pain is high prevalence among patients with cancer. Self-efficacy program can be used as a guide and framework for pain management among adult cancer patients in clinical care.

目的:研究自我效能促进计划对癌症患者疼痛管理的影响:采用准实验设计。采用连续抽样的方法招募了 58 名参与者,然后按时间段分为对照组或实验组,每组 29 人。在实验组开始数据收集之前,先在对照组完成数据收集,以防止实验受到污染。对照组接受标准护理,而实验组则接受自我效能促进计划。采用疼痛自我效能问卷调查患者的自我效能,同时使用数字评分量表评估疼痛程度:结果:与对照组相比,实验组参与者的疼痛自我效能得分更高(P < .05),疼痛程度更低(P < .05):结论:自我效能促进项目有效提高了患者的自我效能评分和疼痛程度。因此,该项目应在护理工作中应用,帮助癌症患者控制疼痛:临床意义:疼痛是癌症患者的高发病。临床意义:疼痛是癌症患者的高发病,自我效能项目可作为临床护理中成年癌症患者疼痛管理的指导和框架。
{"title":"Effect of a Self-Efficacy-Promoting Program on Pain Management Among Patients with Cancer: A Quasi-Experimental Study.","authors":"Jia Liu, Busaba Somjaivong, Ladawan Panpanit, LiFang Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine the effect of a self-efficacy-promoting program on pain management among patients with cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quasi-experimental design was carried out. Fifty-eight participants were recruited by using consecutive sampling and then divided, according to time period, into either the control group or the experimental group, 29 people for each group. Data collection was completed in the control group before starting it in the experimental group to prevent contamination of the experiment. The control group received standard care, whereas the experimental group received a self-efficacy-promoting program. The pain self-efficacy questionnaire was employed to examine patients' self-efficacy, while a numeric rating scale was utilized to evaluate pain levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the control group, the participants in the experimental group had higher pain self-efficacy scores (p < .05) and lower pain levels (p < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The self-efficacy-promoting program effectively improved patients' self-efficacy scores and pain levels. Therefore, the program should be applied in nursing to assist cancer patients with pain management.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Pain is high prevalence among patients with cancer. Self-efficacy program can be used as a guide and framework for pain management among adult cancer patients in clinical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142676656","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Concept Analysis of Moral Distress in Pain Management. 疼痛管理中道德压力的概念分析。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.014
Elizabeth A Byma

Objective: Managing pain continues to be a difficult issue worldwide. Pain management has ethical connotations, with the potential to result in moral distress in nurses. The aim of this concept analysis is to analyze moral distress in pain management.

Design: Walker and Avant's method of concept analysis was utilized to determine attributes, antecedents, and consequences of moral distress in pain management.

Methods: Literature searches in The Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Pub Med were performed. The search identified and utilized 16 articles in the concept analysis.

Results: Four major attributes of moral distress in pain management are discussed: (1) feeling of ownership of patient pain, (2) perceived powerlessness, (3) frustration, and (4) feelings of conflict between pain management situation, personal values, and professional values of nursing. Antecedents were patients experiencing pain, barriers, and having knowledge of the right thing to do. Consequences included nurse burnout, turnover and exit from the profession, compromised patient care, emotional withdrawal from patients, depersonalization of patients, and feelings of complicity and wrongdoing.

Conclusions: This concept analysis provides a foundation for future research examining moral distress in pain management.

目的:在全球范围内,疼痛管理仍然是一个棘手的问题。疼痛管理具有伦理内涵,有可能导致护士的道德困扰。本概念分析旨在分析疼痛管理中的道德困扰:设计:采用 Walker 和 Avant 的概念分析方法来确定疼痛管理中道德困扰的属性、前因和后果:方法:在《护理与专职医疗文献累积索引》(CINAHL)、MEDLINE、Web of Science 和 Pub Med 中进行文献检索。搜索确定并在概念分析中使用了 16 篇文章:讨论了疼痛管理中道德困扰的四个主要属性:(1)对患者疼痛的主人翁感;(2)感知到的无力感;(3)挫败感;(4)疼痛管理情况、个人价值观和护理专业价值观之间的冲突感。前因包括患者的疼痛经历、障碍以及对正确做法的了解。后果包括护士职业倦怠、离职和退出护理行业、患者护理受损、情感上远离患者、患者人格解体以及共谋和错误行为感:这一概念分析为今后研究疼痛管理中的道德困扰奠定了基础。
{"title":"Concept Analysis of Moral Distress in Pain Management.","authors":"Elizabeth A Byma","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Managing pain continues to be a difficult issue worldwide. Pain management has ethical connotations, with the potential to result in moral distress in nurses. The aim of this concept analysis is to analyze moral distress in pain management.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Walker and Avant's method of concept analysis was utilized to determine attributes, antecedents, and consequences of moral distress in pain management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literature searches in The Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Pub Med were performed. The search identified and utilized 16 articles in the concept analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four major attributes of moral distress in pain management are discussed: (1) feeling of ownership of patient pain, (2) perceived powerlessness, (3) frustration, and (4) feelings of conflict between pain management situation, personal values, and professional values of nursing. Antecedents were patients experiencing pain, barriers, and having knowledge of the right thing to do. Consequences included nurse burnout, turnover and exit from the profession, compromised patient care, emotional withdrawal from patients, depersonalization of patients, and feelings of complicity and wrongdoing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This concept analysis provides a foundation for future research examining moral distress in pain management.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142639414","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patient Experience of Pain Management Following Cardiac Surgery: A Mixed Methods Study. 心脏手术后疼痛管理的患者体验:混合方法研究
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.012
Jo McDonall, Jessica Wilson, Mari Botti, Anastasia Hutchinson

Purpose: Recovery following cardiac surgery via sternotomy involves weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation, maintaining hemodynamic stability, and preventing complications. In the early postoperative period, a key priority is adequate pain control to allow patients to actively participate in exercise. The purpose of this study was to (i) describe analgesic prescribing and administration practices following cardiac surgery via sternotomy and (ii) explore patients' pain experience and how this impacted participation in early postoperative care.

Methods: This research project was a pilot descriptive exploratory study using multiple methods and conducted within a single site. A medical record chart audit was performed to obtain details of prescribed and administered multimodal analgesics and pain intensity scores over the first 3 days following surgery. Semi-structured interviews and responses to validated questionnaires were obtained from 20 postoperative patients on days 3-4 following cardiac surgery to determine pain experience and the impact of pain on participation in recovery.

Results: Patients had a varied experience of pain intensity during their recovery. A total of 19 patients (95%) received 100% of their fixed daily dose of analgesics, but only 22% of available as needed opioids were administered on day 1 and only 12% were administered on day 2. Many patients experienced higher levels of pain at both rest and movement in the 24 hours prior to interview than were recorded in their medical records.

Conclusions: Patients can experience significant pain following major cardiac surgery, and this pain can hinder their ability to participate in important activities, such as deep breathing and coughing and mobilizing, that are central to their recovery. Gaps in the management of breakthrough pain in the early postoperative period were identified. To promote optimal recovery following cardiac surgery, nurses need to assess pain at both rest and movement and administer effective doses of as needed analgesia to manage the occurrence of breakthrough pain. Additionally, patients need to be more informed to understand the link between well controlled pain and their ability to participate in their recovery.

Clinical implications: To promote optimal recovery following cardiac surgery, nurses need to assess pain at both rest and movement and administer effective doses of as needed analgesia to manage the occurrence of breakthrough pain. Additionally, patients need to be more informed to understand the link between well controlled pain and their ability to participate in their recovery.

目的:经胸骨切开的心脏手术后的恢复包括从侵入性机械通气中断气、维持血液动力学稳定和预防并发症。在术后早期,首要任务是充分控制疼痛,使患者能够积极参与锻炼。本研究的目的是:(i) 描述经胸骨切开心脏手术后的镇痛处方和给药方法;(ii) 探讨患者的疼痛体验以及这对参与术后早期护理的影响:本研究项目是一项试验性描述性探索研究,采用多种方法,在单一地点进行。研究人员对病历进行了审核,以了解术后头 3 天内处方和使用多模式镇痛药的详细情况以及疼痛强度评分。在心脏手术后第 3-4 天,对 20 名术后患者进行了半结构式访谈,并获得了他们对有效问卷的答复,以确定患者的疼痛体验以及疼痛对参与康复的影响:结果:患者在康复期间对疼痛强度的体验各不相同。共有 19 名患者(95%)100% 服用了每日固定剂量的镇痛药,但只有 22% 的患者在第 1 天按需服用了阿片类药物,只有 12% 的患者在第 2 天服用了阿片类药物。许多患者在接受访谈前的 24 小时内,在休息和活动时的疼痛程度均高于病历记录的疼痛程度:患者在接受心脏大手术后可能会感到剧烈疼痛,而这种疼痛会妨碍他们参与深呼吸、咳嗽和活动等重要活动,而这些活动对他们的康复至关重要。我们发现了术后早期突破性疼痛管理方面的不足。为了促进心脏手术后的最佳恢复,护士需要评估休息和活动时的疼痛,并根据需要给予有效剂量的镇痛剂,以控制突破性疼痛的发生。此外,患者需要了解更多信息,以理解疼痛得到良好控制与他们参与康复的能力之间的联系:为促进心脏手术后的最佳恢复,护士需要评估患者在休息和运动时的疼痛,并根据需要给予有效剂量的镇痛剂,以控制突破性疼痛的发生。此外,患者需要获得更多信息,以了解疼痛得到良好控制与他们参与康复的能力之间的联系。
{"title":"Patient Experience of Pain Management Following Cardiac Surgery: A Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Jo McDonall, Jessica Wilson, Mari Botti, Anastasia Hutchinson","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Recovery following cardiac surgery via sternotomy involves weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation, maintaining hemodynamic stability, and preventing complications. In the early postoperative period, a key priority is adequate pain control to allow patients to actively participate in exercise. The purpose of this study was to (i) describe analgesic prescribing and administration practices following cardiac surgery via sternotomy and (ii) explore patients' pain experience and how this impacted participation in early postoperative care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This research project was a pilot descriptive exploratory study using multiple methods and conducted within a single site. A medical record chart audit was performed to obtain details of prescribed and administered multimodal analgesics and pain intensity scores over the first 3 days following surgery. Semi-structured interviews and responses to validated questionnaires were obtained from 20 postoperative patients on days 3-4 following cardiac surgery to determine pain experience and the impact of pain on participation in recovery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients had a varied experience of pain intensity during their recovery. A total of 19 patients (95%) received 100% of their fixed daily dose of analgesics, but only 22% of available as needed opioids were administered on day 1 and only 12% were administered on day 2. Many patients experienced higher levels of pain at both rest and movement in the 24 hours prior to interview than were recorded in their medical records.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients can experience significant pain following major cardiac surgery, and this pain can hinder their ability to participate in important activities, such as deep breathing and coughing and mobilizing, that are central to their recovery. Gaps in the management of breakthrough pain in the early postoperative period were identified. To promote optimal recovery following cardiac surgery, nurses need to assess pain at both rest and movement and administer effective doses of as needed analgesia to manage the occurrence of breakthrough pain. Additionally, patients need to be more informed to understand the link between well controlled pain and their ability to participate in their recovery.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>To promote optimal recovery following cardiac surgery, nurses need to assess pain at both rest and movement and administer effective doses of as needed analgesia to manage the occurrence of breakthrough pain. Additionally, patients need to be more informed to understand the link between well controlled pain and their ability to participate in their recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142625470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Use of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in Labor Pain: An Integrative Review. 经皮神经电刺激(TENS)在分娩疼痛中的应用:综合评述。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.004
Sevil Günaydın, Ebru Şen, Tülay Yılmaz, Hüsniye Dinç Kaya

Background: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a noninvasive, safe electrophysical pain relief method during childbirth.

Aim: This study was carried out to reveal information about the effectiveness of TENS, which is used to relieve labor pain.

Methods: Inspired by Whittemore and Knafl, we conducted an integrative literature review, including the five key stages of problem identification, literature search, data evaluation, data analysis, and presentation of results. This integrative review was performed between February 27 and March 30, 2023, using the Google Scholar, PubMed, and ScienceDirect databases. The search was made over Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa internet access network using the English keywords such as (birth OR labor OR labor pain OR birth pain) AND (women OR pregnant women OR pregnancy) AND (transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation OR TENS OR nonpharmacological). The checklist developed by Joanna Briggs Institute was used to examine the methodological quality of studies.

Results: Eleven articles were included in this study. The total number of samples included in the research is 1,576. The Visual Analog Scale was used to assess labor pain in 9 of the 11 studies included in the research. In all studies, high-frequency TENS (at frequencies of 15-100 Hz) was used in the active phase of labor. It is seen that the TENS intervention was more effective in studies comparing it with control, placebo, lavender, and water immersion at cervical dilatation at 6 cm groups.

Conclusion: In studies evaluating the effectiveness of TENS, it has been found to be an effective method in relieving labor pain.

背景:目的:本研究旨在揭示用于缓解分娩疼痛的经皮神经电刺激(TENS)的有效性:受 Whittemore 和 Knafl 的启发,我们进行了综合文献综述,包括发现问题、文献检索、数据评估、数据分析和结果展示五个关键阶段。我们在 2023 年 2 月 27 日至 3 月 30 日期间使用 Google Scholar、PubMed 和 ScienceDirect 数据库进行了这一综合性综述。检索通过伊斯坦布尔大学-切拉帕萨互联网接入网络进行,使用的英文关键词包括(分娩或生产或生产痛或分娩痛)和(妇女或孕妇或妊娠)和(经皮神经电刺激或TENS或非药物疗法)。乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)制定的检查表用于检查研究的方法学质量:本研究共纳入 11 篇文章。研究共纳入 1,576 个样本。在纳入研究的 11 项研究中,有 9 项使用了视觉模拟量表来评估分娩疼痛。在所有研究中,高频 TENS(频率为 15-100 Hz)均用于分娩的活跃期。在与对照组、安慰剂组、薰衣草组和宫颈扩张 6 厘米时浸水组进行比较后发现,TENS 干预更为有效:结论:在对 TENS 的有效性进行评估的研究中发现,TENS 是缓解分娩疼痛的有效方法。
{"title":"Use of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in Labor Pain: An Integrative Review.","authors":"Sevil Günaydın, Ebru Şen, Tülay Yılmaz, Hüsniye Dinç Kaya","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a noninvasive, safe electrophysical pain relief method during childbirth.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study was carried out to reveal information about the effectiveness of TENS, which is used to relieve labor pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Inspired by Whittemore and Knafl, we conducted an integrative literature review, including the five key stages of problem identification, literature search, data evaluation, data analysis, and presentation of results. This integrative review was performed between February 27 and March 30, 2023, using the Google Scholar, PubMed, and ScienceDirect databases. The search was made over Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa internet access network using the English keywords such as (birth OR labor OR labor pain OR birth pain) AND (women OR pregnant women OR pregnancy) AND (transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation OR TENS OR nonpharmacological). The checklist developed by Joanna Briggs Institute was used to examine the methodological quality of studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven articles were included in this study. The total number of samples included in the research is 1,576. The Visual Analog Scale was used to assess labor pain in 9 of the 11 studies included in the research. In all studies, high-frequency TENS (at frequencies of 15-100 Hz) was used in the active phase of labor. It is seen that the TENS intervention was more effective in studies comparing it with control, placebo, lavender, and water immersion at cervical dilatation at 6 cm groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In studies evaluating the effectiveness of TENS, it has been found to be an effective method in relieving labor pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142625519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Disparities, Inequities, and Injustices in Populations With Pain: An ASPMN Position Statement. 疼痛人群中的差异、不公平和不公正:ASPMN 立场声明。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.015
Mitchell R Knisely, Staja Q Booker, Anitha Saravanan, Navdeep Singh, Brian Pervis, Gloria Mahalage, Marian Wilson

Disparities, inequities, and injustices in populations with pain are historically pervasive and lead to deleterious patient outcomes and perpetuate systemic barriers to achieving equitable pain management. The American Society for Pain Management Nursing (ASPMN) upholds the principle that all persons with pain have equal rights to evidence-based, high quality pain assessment, management, and treatment. Intervening at multilevels (i.e., individual, interpersonal, community, societal) is necessary to ascertain that just and equitable pain care is provided to all populations.

疼痛人群中的不平等、不公平和不公正现象历来普遍存在,导致了有害的患者治疗结果,并使实现公平疼痛管理的系统性障碍长期存在。美国疼痛管理护理学会(ASPMN)坚持的原则是,所有疼痛患者都有平等的权利接受循证、高质量的疼痛评估、管理和治疗。在多层次(即个人、人际、社区、社会)进行干预是确保向所有人群提供公正、公平的疼痛护理所必需的。
{"title":"Disparities, Inequities, and Injustices in Populations With Pain: An ASPMN Position Statement.","authors":"Mitchell R Knisely, Staja Q Booker, Anitha Saravanan, Navdeep Singh, Brian Pervis, Gloria Mahalage, Marian Wilson","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.015","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Disparities, inequities, and injustices in populations with pain are historically pervasive and lead to deleterious patient outcomes and perpetuate systemic barriers to achieving equitable pain management. The American Society for Pain Management Nursing (ASPMN) upholds the principle that all persons with pain have equal rights to evidence-based, high quality pain assessment, management, and treatment. Intervening at multilevels (i.e., individual, interpersonal, community, societal) is necessary to ascertain that just and equitable pain care is provided to all populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142625371","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Pain Management Nursing
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1