首页 > 最新文献

Pain Management Nursing最新文献

英文 中文
A Conceptual Analysis of Opioid Use Disorder in Chronic Noncancer Pain Using Rodger's Evolutionary Approach 使用罗杰进化法对慢性非癌性疼痛中阿片类药物使用障碍进行概念分析。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.03.017

Objective

This study aims to examine the complex nature of opioid use disorder (OUD) in chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) by exploring its antecedents, attributes, consequences, and interrelated concepts.

Design

A systematic literature review was conducted to gather relevant studies published between 2015 and 2022, utilizing the CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and PubMed databases.

Data Sources

The selected databases provided a comprehensive range of articles related to OUD in CNCP, ensuring a comprehensive topic analysis.

Methods

Twenty-two articles meeting the inclusion criteria were included in the analysis. These articles were critically reviewed and analyzed to identify key themes and concepts related to OUD in CNCP.

Results

The findings of this study shed light on the multifaceted aspects of OUD in CNCP, including its antecedents, such as goals of physical function improvement, prescription of opioids for CNCP, social influences, and mental health dynamics. The attributes of OUD in CNCP were identified as chronic pain, noncancer pain, opioid use, misuse, and abuse. OUD's consequences in CNCP include impaired functioning, increased health risks, psychological distress, social challenges, and economic burden.

Conclusion

Understanding the complexity of OUD in CNCP is crucial for improving patient outcomes. Collaborative efforts among healthcare systems, regulatory bodies, and professional organizations are needed to develop policies promoting safe and effective pain management while mitigating risks associated with opioid use in CNCP.

Implications for Practice

Implementing policy recommendations derived from this study enhances care and outcomes for individuals with CNCP. By addressing complex issues of OUD in CNCP and adopting evidence-based practices, healthcare providers can optimize pain management and promote well-being in CNCP patients.

目的:本研究旨在通过探讨慢性非癌性疼痛(CNCP)阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的前因、属性、后果及相关概念,研究其复杂性:本研究旨在通过探讨慢性非癌性疼痛(CNCP)中阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的前因、属性、后果及相互关联的概念,研究其复杂性:利用 CINAHL、MEDLINE、PsycINFO 和 PubMed 数据库,对 2015 年至 2022 年间发表的相关研究进行了系统性文献综述:所选数据库提供了与 CNCP 中 OUD 相关的全面文章,确保了全面的主题分析:符合纳入标准的 22 篇文章被纳入分析。对这些文章进行了严格审查和分析,以确定与 CNCP 中 OUD 相关的关键主题和概念:本研究结果揭示了 CNCP 中 OUD 的多面性,包括其前因后果,如改善身体功能的目标、为 CNCP 开具阿片类药物处方、社会影响和心理健康动态。CNCP 中阿片类药物滥用的特征包括慢性疼痛、非癌症性疼痛、阿片类药物的使用、误用和滥用。OUD 给 CNCP 带来的后果包括功能受损、健康风险增加、心理困扰、社会挑战和经济负担:了解 OUD 在 CNCP 中的复杂性对于改善患者预后至关重要。医疗保健系统、监管机构和专业组织之间需要通力合作,共同制定政策,促进安全有效的疼痛管理,同时降低与 CNCP 使用阿片类药物相关的风险:实施本研究提出的政策建议可加强对 CNCP 患者的治疗并提高治疗效果。通过解决 CNCP 中阿片类药物依赖的复杂问题并采用循证实践,医疗服务提供者可以优化疼痛管理并促进 CNCP 患者的健康。
{"title":"A Conceptual Analysis of Opioid Use Disorder in Chronic Noncancer Pain Using Rodger's Evolutionary Approach","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.03.017","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.03.017","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aims to examine the complex nature of opioid use disorder (OUD) in chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) by exploring its antecedents, attributes, consequences, and interrelated concepts.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A systematic literature review was conducted to gather relevant studies published between 2015 and 2022, utilizing the CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and PubMed databases.</p></div><div><h3>Data Sources</h3><p>The selected databases provided a comprehensive range of articles related to OUD in CNCP, ensuring a comprehensive topic analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Twenty-two articles meeting the inclusion criteria were included in the analysis. These articles were critically reviewed and analyzed to identify key themes and concepts related to OUD in CNCP.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The findings of this study shed light on the multifaceted aspects of OUD in CNCP, including its antecedents, such as goals of physical function improvement, prescription of opioids for CNCP, social influences, and mental health dynamics. The attributes of OUD in CNCP were identified as chronic pain, noncancer pain, opioid use, misuse, and abuse. OUD's consequences in CNCP include impaired functioning, increased health risks, psychological distress, social challenges, and economic burden.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Understanding the complexity of OUD in CNCP is crucial for improving patient outcomes. Collaborative efforts among healthcare systems, regulatory bodies, and professional organizations are needed to develop policies promoting safe and effective pain management while mitigating risks associated with opioid use in CNCP.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for Practice</h3><p>Implementing policy recommendations derived from this study enhances care and outcomes for individuals with CNCP. By addressing complex issues of OUD in CNCP and adopting evidence-based practices, healthcare providers can optimize pain management and promote well-being in CNCP patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140903820","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Consensus Guidelines for Assessment and Comprehensive Outcomes Evaluation in Rural Pain Clinics 农村疼痛诊所评估和综合结果评价共识指南》。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.03.006

Recent advancements in nurse anesthesiology fellowship training programs have helped to establish advanced pain management services for rural communities. Consensus guidelines to direct the rural provider toward the most valid and reliable measures for pain assessment and functional outcomes evaluation are not presently available. The primary aim of this initiative was to establish consensus guidelines for a comprehensive outcome evaluation program with specific time intervals for assessments that can be utilized by all rural pain clinics. The American Association of Nurse Anesthesiology Nonsurgical Pain Management Advisory Panel members provided formative and expert feedback for this initiative. The Delphi model was utilized to achieve consensus through multiple rounds of surveys. Items achieving >70% agree/strongly agree were kept; items with >70% disagree/strongly disagree were rejected; items meeting neither advanced to the following round for evaluation until consensus was met. During round I, consensus was reached for: (1) the use of the Numerical Rating Scale for pain severity; and (2) timing of pain severity & functional pain outcomes on each office visit and before/after each intervention. Round II, consensus was achieved for: (1) the use of Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale as a suitable instrument when literacy or communication pose a barrier but not as a primary assessment; and (2) the use of the Brief Pain Index-Short Form for functional outcome measures. During round III, consensus was reached for: (1) the use of the Oswestry Disability Index as a functional outcome measure; and (2) pain reassessment being performed within 14 days of intervention. This initiative provides rural pain clinics with a comprehensive outcome evaluation program with specific time intervals for assessments.

麻醉学护士研究员培训计划的最新进展有助于为农村社区建立先进的疼痛管理服务。目前还没有共识指南来指导农村医疗服务提供者采用最有效、最可靠的疼痛评估和功能结果评估措施。这项倡议的主要目的是为全面的结果评估计划制定共识指南,并规定评估的具体时间间隔,供所有农村疼痛诊所使用。美国麻醉护士协会非手术疼痛管理顾问小组成员为该计划提供了形成性的专家反馈意见。通过多轮调查,利用德尔菲模型达成了共识。同意/非常同意率超过 70% 的项目予以保留;不同意/非常不同意率超过 70% 的项目予以剔除;两者均不符合的项目进入下一轮评估,直至达成共识。在第一轮中,就以下方面达成了共识(1) 疼痛严重程度数字分级量表的使用;(2) 每次就诊和每次干预前后疼痛严重程度和功能性疼痛结果的时间安排。第二轮,就以下方面达成共识(1) 当读写能力或沟通能力存在障碍时,使用 Wong-Baker FACES 疼痛评分量表作为合适的评估工具,但不作为主要评估工具;以及 (2) 使用简短疼痛指数短表进行功能性结果测量。在第三轮中,就以下方面达成了共识(1) 使用 Oswestry 残疾指数作为功能结果测量;以及 (2) 在干预后 14 天内进行疼痛再评估。这一举措为农村疼痛诊所提供了一个全面的结果评估计划,并规定了评估的具体时间间隔。
{"title":"Consensus Guidelines for Assessment and Comprehensive Outcomes Evaluation in Rural Pain Clinics","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.03.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.03.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Recent advancements in nurse anesthesiology<span><span><span><span> fellowship training programs have helped to establish advanced pain management services for rural communities. Consensus guidelines to direct the rural provider toward the most valid and reliable measures for pain assessment and functional outcomes evaluation are not presently available. The primary aim of this initiative was to establish consensus guidelines for a comprehensive outcome </span>evaluation program with specific time intervals for assessments that can be utilized by all rural pain clinics. The American Association of Nurse Anesthesiology Nonsurgical Pain Management </span>Advisory Panel<span><span> members provided formative and expert feedback for this initiative. The Delphi model was utilized to achieve consensus through multiple rounds of surveys. Items achieving &gt;70% agree/strongly agree were kept; items with &gt;70% disagree/strongly disagree were rejected; items meeting neither advanced to the following round for evaluation until consensus was met. During round I, consensus was reached for: (1) the use of the Numerical Rating Scale for </span>pain severity; and (2) timing of pain severity &amp; functional pain outcomes on each </span></span>office visit and before/after each intervention. Round II, consensus was achieved for: (1) the use of Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale as a suitable instrument when literacy or communication pose a barrier but not as a primary assessment; and (2) the use of the Brief Pain Index-Short Form for functional outcome measures. During round III, consensus was reached for: (1) the use of the </span></span>Oswestry Disability Index as a functional outcome measure; and (2) pain reassessment being performed within 14 days of intervention. This initiative provides rural pain clinics with a comprehensive outcome evaluation program with specific time intervals for assessments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140860202","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Empowering Cancer Patients with Self-Care and Pain Management Skills: A Quasi-Experimental Study 增强癌症患者的自我护理和疼痛管理技能:准实验研究
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.03.001

Background

Cancer patients experience distress as a result of their health condition, which, in turn, contributes to the progression of the disease. Moreover, their daily activities, well-being, and health status are significantly impacted by pain and other symptoms. In this context, empowering these patients with self-care and pain management skills can greatly contribute to effective symptom control.

Aim

To develop and implement an educational approach focused on empowering family caregivers and patients with advanced cancer in effectively managing pain at home.

Method

An educational program, PECP/C-Pain Management, was developed to empower family caregivers and cancer patients to manage pain at home. A quasi-experimental study involving 52 participants with advanced cancer was conducted to test the program. Participants’ skills, behaviors, and knowledge related to self-care and pain management were assessed before and after the intervention using an appropriate instrument, the Pain Management Knowledge and Behavior Scale.

Results

Pain was reported as the primary symptom, and following the educational program, participants were able to monitor pain and other symptoms and effectively self-manage their treatment.

Conclusions

The findings suggest that the PECP/C-Pain Management intervention was effective in improving participants’ knowledge and skills in managing pain, leading to better symptom control. In addition, the Pain Management Knowledge and Behavior Scale is a reliable tool for measuring the outcomes of this intervention.

背景:癌症患者因其健康状况而感到痛苦,这反过来又会导致病情恶化。此外,他们的日常活动、幸福感和健康状况也受到疼痛和其他症状的严重影响。在这种情况下,增强这些患者的自我护理和疼痛管理技能可极大地促进症状的有效控制。目的:制定并实施一种教育方法,重点是增强晚期癌症患者的家庭护理人员和患者的能力,使他们能够在家中有效地控制疼痛:方法:制定一项名为 "PECP/C-疼痛管理 "的教育计划,以增强家庭护理人员和癌症患者在家管理疼痛的能力。为了测试该计划,我们开展了一项准实验研究,共有 52 名晚期癌症患者参加。在干预前后,使用适当的工具--疼痛管理知识和行为量表--对参与者与自我护理和疼痛管理相关的技能、行为和知识进行了评估:结果:据报告,疼痛是主要症状,在接受教育计划后,参与者能够监测疼痛和其他症状,并有效地进行自我管理:研究结果表明,PECP/C-疼痛管理干预能有效提高参与者管理疼痛的知识和技能,从而更好地控制症状。此外,疼痛管理知识和行为量表也是衡量该干预成果的可靠工具。
{"title":"Empowering Cancer Patients with Self-Care and Pain Management Skills: A Quasi-Experimental Study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.03.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.03.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Cancer patients experience distress as a result of their health condition, which, in turn, contributes to the progression of the disease. Moreover, their daily activities, well-being, and health status are significantly impacted by pain and other symptoms. In this context, empowering these patients with self-care and pain management skills can greatly contribute to effective symptom control.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To develop and implement an educational approach focused on empowering family caregivers and patients with advanced cancer in effectively managing pain at home.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>An educational program, PECP/C-Pain Management, was developed to empower family caregivers and cancer patients to manage pain at home. A quasi-experimental study involving 52 participants with advanced cancer was conducted to test the program. Participants’ skills, behaviors, and knowledge related to self-care and pain management were assessed before and after the intervention using an appropriate instrument, the Pain Management Knowledge and Behavior Scale.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Pain was reported as the primary symptom, and following the educational program, participants were able to monitor pain and other symptoms and effectively self-manage their treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The findings suggest that the PECP/C-Pain Management intervention was effective in improving participants’ knowledge and skills in managing pain, leading to better symptom control. In addition, the Pain Management Knowledge and Behavior Scale is a reliable tool for measuring the outcomes of this intervention.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1524904224000997/pdfft?md5=02872517f547c55cb81e1b9a933fd748&pid=1-s2.0-S1524904224000997-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140864658","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effectiveness of a Teach-Back Education Program on Perioperative Pain in Patients With Lung Cancer: An Intervention Study Using Behavior Change Wheel 针对肺癌患者围手术期疼痛的回授教育计划的效果:使用行为改变轮的干预研究》。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.03.011

Objective

To assess the effect of a teach-back educational intervention using Behavior Change Wheel (BCW) framework on perioperative pain among patients with lung cancer.

Methods

A prospective quasi-experimental study was conducted in 88 patients with lung cancer from a tertiary hospital in China. According to the order of admission, they were allocated to either control group or intervention group, with 44 patients in each group. Patients in the control group received routine nursing care, while patients in the intervention group were given a teach-back education program based on BCW framework. The visual analog scale (VAS) was adopted to evaluate patients’ pain on the day of surgery (T0), 1 (T1), 2 (T2), and 3 (T3) days after surgery. We also recorded the use of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), the length of hospital stay, and the degree of patients’ satisfaction.

Results

Rest pain, pain when coughing, and pain during activity that patients in the intervention group experienced were significantly less severe than those in the control group on T0 and T1. The pain when coughing in the intervention group was also significantly milder on T2 and T3. In addition, the number of self-control time, use duration, and total dose of PCA were significantly lower in the intervention group. Moreover, patients’ satisfaction of nursing service was significantly higher in the intervention group.

Conclusion

A teach-back education program based on BCW framework was effective in pain management among the perioperative patients with lung cancer. This study demonstrates the application of teach-back method and the BCW in the development of patient education intervention to mitigate perioperative pain.

目的采用行为改变轮(BCW)框架评估回授式教育干预对肺癌患者围手术期疼痛的影响:方法:对中国某三级医院的 88 名肺癌患者进行了一项前瞻性准实验研究。根据入院顺序,患者被分配到对照组或干预组,每组 44 人。对照组患者接受常规护理,而干预组患者则接受基于 BCW 框架的回馈式教育项目。我们采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)来评估患者在手术当天(T0)、术后1天(T1)、2天(T2)和3天(T3)的疼痛情况。我们还记录了患者自控镇痛(PCA)的使用情况、住院时间以及患者的满意度:结果:在 T0 和 T1,干预组患者的休息痛、咳嗽痛和活动痛明显少于对照组。干预组患者咳嗽时的疼痛在 T2 和 T3 也明显减轻。此外,干预组患者自我控制时间、使用时间和 PCA 总剂量均明显低于对照组。此外,干预组患者对护理服务的满意度也明显提高:结论:基于BCW框架的回授式教育计划对肺癌围手术期患者的疼痛管理有效。本研究证明了回授法和BCW在减轻围手术期疼痛的患者教育干预中的应用。
{"title":"Effectiveness of a Teach-Back Education Program on Perioperative Pain in Patients With Lung Cancer: An Intervention Study Using Behavior Change Wheel","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.03.011","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.03.011","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the effect of a teach-back educational intervention using Behavior Change Wheel (BCW) framework on perioperative pain among patients with lung cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A prospective quasi-experimental study was conducted in 88 patients with lung cancer from a tertiary hospital in China. According to the order of admission, they were allocated to either control group or intervention group, with 44 patients in each group. Patients in the control group received routine nursing care, while patients in the intervention group were given a teach-back education program based on BCW framework. The visual analog scale (VAS) was adopted to evaluate patients’ pain on the day of surgery (T0), 1 (T1), 2 (T2), and 3 (T3) days after surgery. We also recorded the use of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), the length of hospital stay, and the degree of patients’ satisfaction.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Rest pain, pain when coughing, and pain during activity that patients in the intervention group experienced were significantly less severe than those in the control group on T0 and T1. The pain when coughing in the intervention group was also significantly milder on T2 and T3. In addition, the number of self-control time, use duration, and total dose of PCA were significantly lower in the intervention group. Moreover, patients’ satisfaction of nursing service was significantly higher in the intervention group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A teach-back education program based on BCW framework was effective in pain management among the perioperative patients with lung cancer. This study demonstrates the application of teach-back method and the BCW in the development of patient education intervention to mitigate perioperative pain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1524904224001097/pdfft?md5=addfb22cc56c3db59061948e5b8f4c63&pid=1-s2.0-S1524904224001097-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140870234","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Information for Readers 读者信息
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/S1524-9042(24)00206-6
{"title":"Information for Readers","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S1524-9042(24)00206-6","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S1524-9042(24)00206-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1524904224002066/pdfft?md5=4e1ad2640eb07f3b5242c355717fcf78&pid=1-s2.0-S1524904224002066-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141979822","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Perceptions of Nurses Regarding Opioid Administration: A cross-sectional study 护士对阿片类药物管理的看法:横断面研究。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.02.013

Background

Opioids are important drugs used in pain management due to their strong analgesic effects. However, there is limited research on nurses' perceptions of administering opioids.

Purpose

This study aims to determine nurses' perceptions of administering opioids.

Design

This study used a descriptive cross-sectional design.

Settings

A university hospital located in the south of Turkey.

Methods

A self-reporting survey was provided to a convenience sample of 190 nurses. The data were collected with the “Introductory Information Form,” and the “Nurses’ Perceptions on Opioid Medications Administration Questionnaire.” Descriptive statistics were applied for data analysis.

Results

The mean age of the nurses was 33.11 ± 7.82 and 86.3% were female. The majority of the nurses did not receive any training on opioid administration other than their undergraduate education. Among the nursing staff, 90.0% expressed the importance of having trust in the prescribing doctor for their comfort in administering opioids. Of the nurses, 30% were undecided about “Nurses associate opioids with drug abuse.” and 78.9% disagreed with the statement "Nurses often associate giving opioids with helping patients to die.”

Conclusions

The results of this study provided further insight into nurses’ perceptions of administering opioids that potentially contribute to pain management. Nurses had information needs and some prejudices regarding opioid administration. Also, relying on the prescribing doctor was important, and problems with prescribing were an obstacle to pain control.

Clinical Implications

Determining the knowledge and needs of nurses regarding opioid administration and providing in-service training on this subject would positively affect their approach to opioids.

背景:阿片类药物具有很强的镇痛效果,是用于疼痛治疗的重要药物。然而,有关护士对使用阿片类药物的看法的研究却很有限。目的:本研究旨在确定护士对使用阿片类药物的看法:本研究采用描述性横断面设计:地点:土耳其南部的一所大学医院:对 190 名护士进行了自我报告调查。数据通过 "介绍信息表 "和 "护士对阿片类药物管理的看法问卷 "收集。数据分析采用了描述性统计方法:护士的平均年龄为(33.11±7.82)岁,86.3%为女性。大多数护士除本科教育外未接受过任何阿片类药物管理培训。在护理人员中,90.0%的人表示,必须信任开处方的医生,才能放心使用阿片类药物。在护士中,30%的人对 "护士将阿片类药物与药物滥用联系在一起 "这一说法不置可否,78.9%的人不同意 "护士经常将给予阿片类药物与帮助病人死亡联系在一起 "这一说法:这项研究的结果使我们进一步了解了护士对使用阿片类药物的看法,这些药物可能有助于疼痛管理。护士对阿片类药物的使用存在信息需求和一些偏见。此外,依靠开处方的医生也很重要,而处方方面的问题则是疼痛控制的一个障碍:临床启示:确定护士对阿片类药物管理的知识和需求,并提供相关的在职培训,将对她们处理阿片类药物的方法产生积极影响。
{"title":"Perceptions of Nurses Regarding Opioid Administration: A cross-sectional study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.02.013","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.02.013","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Opioids are important drugs used in pain management due to their strong analgesic effects. However, there is limited research on nurses' perceptions of administering opioids.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study aims to determine nurses' perceptions of administering opioids.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>This study used a descriptive cross-sectional design.</p></div><div><h3>Settings</h3><p>A university hospital located in the south of Turkey.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A self-reporting survey was provided to a convenience sample of 190 nurses. The data were collected with the “Introductory Information Form,” and the “Nurses’ Perceptions on Opioid Medications Administration Questionnaire.” Descriptive statistics were applied for data analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean age of the nurses was 33.11 ± 7.82 and 86.3% were female. The majority of the nurses did not receive any training on opioid administration other than their undergraduate education. Among the nursing staff, 90.0% expressed the importance of having trust in the prescribing doctor for their comfort in administering opioids. Of the nurses, 30% were undecided about “Nurses associate opioids with drug abuse.” and 78.9% disagreed with the statement \"Nurses often associate giving opioids with helping patients to die.”</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results of this study provided further insight into nurses’ perceptions of administering opioids that potentially contribute to pain management. Nurses had information needs and some prejudices regarding opioid administration. Also, relying on the prescribing doctor was important, and problems with prescribing were an obstacle to pain control.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical Implications</h3><p>Determining the knowledge and needs of nurses regarding opioid administration and providing in-service training on this subject would positively affect their approach to opioids.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140175945","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prevalence and Associated Factors of Postoperative Acute Pain for Mothers Who Gave Birth With Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 剖宫产产妇术后急性疼痛的发生率及相关因素:系统回顾与元分析》。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.05.010
Basazinew Chekol Demilew, Negesse Zurbachew, Nega Getachew, Getachew Mekete, Diriba Teshome Lema

Background: Cesarean section frequently is associated with different undesirable postoperative outcomes. Acute postoperative pain is one of the most frequently experienced adverse outcomes that occurs as the result of actual tissue damage. Previous studies have shown inconsistent results regarding the prevalence and predictors of acute postoperative pain. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the pooled prevalence and associated factors of postoperative pain after cesarean section.

Methods: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis study that was performed on the basis of studies published within the last 10 years on the prevalence and associated factors of postoperative pain after cesarean section. After PubMed, Google Scholar, HINAR, Scopus, Web of Sciences, Cochrane, EMBASE, and gray literature extensive search for primary studies, their quality was assessed and data was extracted. STATAMP, version 17.0, was used for all possible analyses of the study.

Results: Twenty-eight studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of postoperative pain was 58% (95% confidence interval [CI] 48%, 67%) with heterogeneity (I2 99.33%). Incision length >10 centimeters (odds ratio [OR] 2.34 [95% CI 1.71, 2.97]); spinal anesthesia without adjuvant (OR 3.45 [95% CI 1.56, 5.33]); general type of anesthesia (OR 3.54 [95% CI 2.61, 4.48]); presence of preoperative anxiety (OR-1.73, 95% CI 1.12-2.35); and no peripheral nerve block (OR 3.23 [95% CI, 2.27-4.18]) were associated with the prevalence of postoperative pain significantly.

Conclusions: The pooled prevalence of acute postoperative pain after cesarean section was high (58%), which needs more strategies for pain management. Incision length >10 centimeters, spinal anesthesia without adjuvants, general type of anesthesia, preoperative anxiety, and no peripheral nerve block were significantly associated with this prevalence.

背景:剖腹产经常会导致不同的术后不良后果。术后急性疼痛是最常见的不良后果之一,它是实际组织损伤的结果。以往的研究显示,术后急性疼痛的发生率和预测因素并不一致。因此,本研究旨在评估剖宫产术后疼痛的总体发生率和相关因素:这是一项系统性回顾和荟萃分析研究,以过去 10 年内发表的有关剖宫产术后疼痛发生率和相关因素的研究为基础。在PubMed、Google Scholar、HINAR、Scopus、Web of Sciences、Cochrane、EMBASE和灰色文献中广泛搜索主要研究后,对其质量进行评估并提取数据。所有可能的研究分析均使用 STATAMP(17.0 版):本系统综述和荟萃分析共纳入 28 项研究。汇总的术后疼痛发生率为 58%(95% 置信区间 [CI] 48%,67%),存在异质性(I2 99.33%)。切口长度大于 10 厘米(几率比 [OR] 2.34 [95% CI 1.71, 2.97]);无辅助脊髓麻醉(OR 3.45 [95% CI 1.56, 5.33]);全身麻醉类型(OR 3.54 [95% CI 2.61, 4.48]);术前焦虑(OR-1.73,95% CI 1.12-2.35);无周围神经阻滞(OR 3.23 [95% CI, 2.27-4.18])与术后疼痛发生率显著相关:结论:剖宫产术后急性疼痛的总体发生率较高(58%),需要更多的疼痛管理策略。切口长度大于 10 厘米、无辅助麻醉的脊髓麻醉、全身麻醉类型、术前焦虑和无周围神经阻滞与疼痛发生率显著相关。
{"title":"Prevalence and Associated Factors of Postoperative Acute Pain for Mothers Who Gave Birth With Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Basazinew Chekol Demilew, Negesse Zurbachew, Nega Getachew, Getachew Mekete, Diriba Teshome Lema","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.05.010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2024.05.010","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cesarean section frequently is associated with different undesirable postoperative outcomes. Acute postoperative pain is one of the most frequently experienced adverse outcomes that occurs as the result of actual tissue damage. Previous studies have shown inconsistent results regarding the prevalence and predictors of acute postoperative pain. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the pooled prevalence and associated factors of postoperative pain after cesarean section.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a systematic review and meta-analysis study that was performed on the basis of studies published within the last 10 years on the prevalence and associated factors of postoperative pain after cesarean section. After PubMed, Google Scholar, HINAR, Scopus, Web of Sciences, Cochrane, EMBASE, and gray literature extensive search for primary studies, their quality was assessed and data was extracted. STATA<sup>MP</sup>, version 17.0, was used for all possible analyses of the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of postoperative pain was 58% (95% confidence interval [CI] 48%, 67%) with heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> 99.33%). Incision length >10 centimeters (odds ratio [OR] 2.34 [95% CI 1.71, 2.97]); spinal anesthesia without adjuvant (OR 3.45 [95% CI 1.56, 5.33]); general type of anesthesia (OR 3.54 [95% CI 2.61, 4.48]); presence of preoperative anxiety (OR-1.73, 95% CI 1.12-2.35); and no peripheral nerve block (OR 3.23 [95% CI, 2.27-4.18]) were associated with the prevalence of postoperative pain significantly.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pooled prevalence of acute postoperative pain after cesarean section was high (58%), which needs more strategies for pain management. Incision length >10 centimeters, spinal anesthesia without adjuvants, general type of anesthesia, preoperative anxiety, and no peripheral nerve block were significantly associated with this prevalence.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141734862","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Healthcare Providers’ Utilization of Nonpharmacological Methods in Managing Labor Pain: An Integrative Review 医护人员在处理分娩疼痛时对非药物方法的利用:综合综述》(Healthcare Providers' Utilization of Nonpharmacological Methods in Managing Labor Pain: An Integrative Review.
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.06.010

Background

The management of labor pain is a critical aspect of maternal care, with implications for the well-being of both the mother and the newborn. Nonpharmacological pain management (NPPM) offers a safe and more accessible option to labor pain management in African healthcare settings.

Objective

This review aims to determine the facilitators of and barriers to using NPPM during labor among healthcare professionals (HCPs) in Africa.

Methods

This integrative review was done using articles that focused on NPPM and published between 2013 and 2023. Databases searched include PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and EMBASE. Content analysis was done independently by two reviewers using inductive coding to generate categories.

Findings

Three main themes emerged: Perceived barriers to the utilization of NPPM among HCPs, categories that emerged under this theme include lack of training, resource limitation, lack of priority, cultural norms and beliefs, and lack of awareness. The second theme is potential facilitators to the utilization of NPPM among HCP, the categories generated include healthcare provider’ knowledge, positive attitude of healthcare providers, family support, infrastructure/working environment, experiences of HCPs, and client preferences. The third theme that emerged is the most utilized methods of NPPM among HCPs, with back massage and psychological support being the most used, whereas music and exercise were the least NPPM methods used by HCPs.

Recommendations and implications for care

The findings from this study show that the attitudes and knowledge of HCPs about NPPM can either be a facilitator or a barrier in its utilization. In the clinical setting, HCPs need to be sensitized on the benefits of using these methods of pain management during labor to encourage use. Interventions designed based on the findings from this study can promote a more holistic approach to labor pain management in African healthcare settings.

背景:分娩镇痛是产妇护理的一个重要方面,对产妇和新生儿的健康都有影响。非药物止痛疗法(NPPM)为非洲医疗机构的分娩镇痛提供了一种安全且更易获得的选择:本综述旨在确定非洲医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)在分娩过程中使用非药物镇痛的促进因素和障碍:本综述使用 2013 年至 2023 年间发表的有关 NPPM 的文章。检索的数据库包括 PubMed、CINAHL、SCOPUS 和 EMBASE。内容分析由两名审稿人独立完成,采用归纳编码法进行分类:出现了三大主题:在这一主题下出现的类别包括缺乏培训、资源限制、缺乏优先权、文化规范和信仰以及缺乏意识。第二个主题是促进卫生保健人员使用 NPPM 的潜在因素,产生的类别包括卫生保健人员的知识、卫生保健人员的积极态度、家庭支持、基础设施/工作环境、卫生保健人员的经验和客户偏好。第三个主题是医护人员使用最多的 NPPM 方法,其中背部按摩和心理支持使用最多,而音乐和运动则是医护人员使用最少的 NPPM 方法:本研究的结果表明,保健专业人员对 NPPM 的态度和知识既可以促进 NPPM 的使用,也可以阻碍 NPPM 的使用。在临床环境中,需要向主治医师宣传在分娩过程中使用这些镇痛方法的益处,以鼓励其使用。根据本研究结果设计的干预措施可促进非洲医疗机构采用更全面的分娩镇痛方法。
{"title":"Healthcare Providers’ Utilization of Nonpharmacological Methods in Managing Labor Pain: An Integrative Review","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.06.010","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.06.010","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The management of labor pain is a critical aspect of maternal care, with implications for the well-being of both the mother and the newborn. Nonpharmacological pain management (NPPM) offers a safe and more accessible option to labor pain management in African healthcare settings.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This review aims to determine the facilitators of and barriers to using NPPM during labor among healthcare professionals (HCPs) in Africa.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This integrative review was done using articles that focused on NPPM and published between 2013 and 2023. Databases searched include PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and EMBASE. Content analysis was done independently by two reviewers using inductive coding to generate categories.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Three main themes emerged: Perceived barriers to the utilization of NPPM among HCPs, categories that emerged under this theme include lack of training, resource limitation, lack of priority, cultural norms and beliefs, and lack of awareness. The second theme is potential facilitators to the utilization of NPPM among HCP, the categories generated include healthcare provider’ knowledge, positive attitude of healthcare providers, family support, infrastructure/working environment, experiences of HCPs, and client preferences. The third theme that emerged is the most utilized methods of NPPM among HCPs, with back massage and psychological support being the most used, whereas music and exercise were the least NPPM methods used by HCPs.</p></div><div><h3>Recommendations and implications for care</h3><p>The findings from this study show that the attitudes and knowledge of HCPs about NPPM can either be a facilitator or a barrier in its utilization. In the clinical setting, HCPs need to be sensitized on the benefits of using these methods of pain management during labor to encourage use. Interventions designed based on the findings from this study can promote a more holistic approach to labor pain management in African healthcare settings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1524904224001966/pdfft?md5=9ae8c59dbda3aa9482cda0892fa6ca29&pid=1-s2.0-S1524904224001966-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141724138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patient Evaluation of Patient-Controlled Analgesia for Pain Crises in Sickle Cell Disease. 镰状细胞病患者对患者自控镇痛治疗疼痛危象的评估。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.06.011
Şebnem Rumeli, Selin Azizoğlu, Mustafa Azizoğlu

Background: Vaso-occlusive crisis causing severe pain can be seen in patients with sickle cell anemia and potent opioids should be used in this process. Although sickle cell disease (SCD) patients use patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), we encountered no study evaluating this method from the participants' perspective.

Aim: This descriptive study aimed to evaluate the use and effectiveness of PCA administered using the Mersin Algology Protocol (MAP) during painful episodes of SCD based on participants reports.

Methods: After obtaining approval from the local ethics committee, 109 SCD participants using PCA as per the MAP between 2018 and 2020 were recruited for the study. The participants answered a 28-item questionnaire regarding their annual number of pain crises, sites of pain, knowledge about PCA, the number of times they used PCA, and the positive and negative aspects of the PCA method.

Results: The mean age of the participants was 28.80 ± 11.5 years. Ninety-nine (90.8%) of the participants considered PCA superior to other pain management methods they had used previously. The 53 participants (48.6%) who waited for their pain to worsen before administering the demand dose expressed fear of taking high doses of medication. As the number of times a participant used PCA increased, NRS scores for pain at the time of demand dosing decreased from 7-10 to 4-6 (p = .013). Eighty-five (78%) of the participants reported having no problems related to the device or drug while using PCA.

Conclusion: We found that PCA was used more correctly by participants with more experience using the device. Participants who delay demand dosing do so because of anxiety about developing dependence and to avoid high doses.

背景:镰状细胞性贫血患者会出现导致剧烈疼痛的血管闭塞危象,在此过程中应使用强效阿片类药物。尽管镰状细胞病(SCD)患者使用患者自控镇痛(PCA),但我们没有发现从参与者的角度对这种方法进行评估的研究。目的:这项描述性研究旨在根据参与者的报告,评估在镰状细胞病疼痛发作时使用梅尔辛藻类学方案(MAP)进行 PCA 的使用情况和效果:在获得当地伦理委员会批准后,本研究招募了109名在2018年至2020年间按照MAP使用PCA的SCD参与者。参与者回答了一份包含 28 个项目的调查问卷,内容涉及他们每年的疼痛危机次数、疼痛部位、对 PCA 的了解、使用 PCA 的次数以及 PCA 方法的积极和消极方面:参与者的平均年龄为 28.80±11.5 岁。99名参与者(90.8%)认为PCA优于他们之前使用过的其他疼痛治疗方法。53 名参与者(48.6%)表示害怕服用大剂量药物,他们等待疼痛加剧后才按需给药。随着参与者使用 PCA 的次数增加,按需给药时的疼痛 NRS 评分从 7-10 分降至 4-6 分(p = .013)。85%(78%)的参与者表示在使用 PCA 时没有遇到与设备或药物相关的问题:我们发现,使用设备经验丰富的参与者使用 PCA 的正确率更高。延迟按需给药的参与者是因为担心产生依赖性和避免高剂量。
{"title":"Patient Evaluation of Patient-Controlled Analgesia for Pain Crises in Sickle Cell Disease.","authors":"Şebnem Rumeli, Selin Azizoğlu, Mustafa Azizoğlu","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.06.011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2024.06.011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vaso-occlusive crisis causing severe pain can be seen in patients with sickle cell anemia and potent opioids should be used in this process. Although sickle cell disease (SCD) patients use patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), we encountered no study evaluating this method from the participants' perspective.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This descriptive study aimed to evaluate the use and effectiveness of PCA administered using the Mersin Algology Protocol (MAP) during painful episodes of SCD based on participants reports.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After obtaining approval from the local ethics committee, 109 SCD participants using PCA as per the MAP between 2018 and 2020 were recruited for the study. The participants answered a 28-item questionnaire regarding their annual number of pain crises, sites of pain, knowledge about PCA, the number of times they used PCA, and the positive and negative aspects of the PCA method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the participants was 28.80 ± 11.5 years. Ninety-nine (90.8%) of the participants considered PCA superior to other pain management methods they had used previously. The 53 participants (48.6%) who waited for their pain to worsen before administering the demand dose expressed fear of taking high doses of medication. As the number of times a participant used PCA increased, NRS scores for pain at the time of demand dosing decreased from 7-10 to 4-6 (p = .013). Eighty-five (78%) of the participants reported having no problems related to the device or drug while using PCA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that PCA was used more correctly by participants with more experience using the device. Participants who delay demand dosing do so because of anxiety about developing dependence and to avoid high doses.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141627342","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Experiences of Teaching and Learning Pediatric Pain Management in Ghana 加纳儿科疼痛治疗的教学经验。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.05.004

Background

The literature has revealed gaps in knowledge and attitudes regarding pediatric pain management among Ghanaian nurses and nursing students that can be attributed to inadequate education in the area. Consequently, nursing tutors teaching pain management might not have the appropriate knowledge to transfer to their students.

Purpose

To explore nursing tutors’ experiences of teaching pediatric pain management as well as their students’ learning experiences before and after the tutors’ training workshop.

Design

A descriptive qualitative design was employed for the conduct of the study.

Methods

Data were collected via focus groups from 32 tutors and 24 students before and after an educational workshop. Data analysis drew on Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis.

Findings

Pre-workshop themes revealed knowledge deficits regarding pediatric pain management in both tutors and students due to learning having occurred in bits and pieces. Furthermore, lack of accessibility to books and pain scales perpetuated this bits-and-pieces approach to learning. Post-workshop findings revealed gains in tutors’ knowledge and skills. Consequently, students gained new insights into pediatric pain management.

Conclusion

Tutors and student nurses had a knowledge deficit regarding pediatric pain management. The educational workshop and the provision of learning materials resulted in enhanced knowledge and attitudes that subsequently improved tutors’ ability to effectively teach the topic to their students, with a clear implication for improvements in clinical practice.

Clinical Implication

Educating nursing tutors about pediatric pain is imperative to enable students and thus future nurses to be equipped with the necessary evidence-based knowledge of how to manage pediatric pain.

背景:文献显示,加纳护士和护理专业学生对小儿疼痛管理的知识和态度存在差距,原因可能是该领域的教育不足。目的:探讨护理导师教授小儿疼痛管理的经验,以及导师培训研讨会前后学生的学习经验:设计:本研究采用描述性定性设计:方法:在教育研讨会前后,通过焦点小组收集了 32 名导师和 24 名学生的数据。数据分析借鉴了布劳恩和克拉克的主题分析法:工作坊前的主题揭示了导师和学生在小儿疼痛管理方面的知识缺陷,因为他们的学习都是零碎的。此外,由于无法获得书籍和疼痛量表,这种零碎的学习方法得以延续。工作坊后的调查结果显示,讲师的知识和技能都有所提高。因此,学生们对儿科疼痛管理有了新的认识:辅导员和护士学生在儿科疼痛管理方面存在知识缺陷。教育工作坊和学习材料的提供增强了辅导教师的知识和态度,从而提高了他们向学生有效传授相关知识的能力,对改善临床实践具有明显的意义:临床启示:对护理导师进行有关儿科疼痛的教育势在必行,这样才能让学生以及未来的护士掌握必要的循证知识,了解如何管理儿科疼痛。
{"title":"Experiences of Teaching and Learning Pediatric Pain Management in Ghana","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.05.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.05.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The literature has revealed gaps in knowledge and attitudes regarding pediatric pain management among Ghanaian nurses and nursing students that can be attributed to inadequate education in the area. Consequently, nursing tutors teaching pain management might not have the appropriate knowledge to transfer to their students.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To explore nursing tutors’ experiences of teaching pediatric pain management as well as their students’ learning experiences before and after the tutors’ training workshop.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A descriptive qualitative design was employed for the conduct of the study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data were collected via focus groups from 32 tutors and 24 students before and after an educational workshop. Data analysis drew on Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Pre-workshop themes revealed knowledge deficits regarding pediatric pain management in both tutors and students due to learning having occurred in bits and pieces. Furthermore, lack of accessibility to books and pain scales perpetuated this bits-and-pieces approach to learning. Post-workshop findings revealed gains in tutors’ knowledge and skills. Consequently, students gained new insights into pediatric pain management.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Tutors and student nurses had a knowledge deficit regarding pediatric pain management. The educational workshop and the provision of learning materials resulted in enhanced knowledge and attitudes that subsequently improved tutors’ ability to effectively teach the topic to their students, with a clear implication for improvements in clinical practice.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical Implication</h3><p>Educating nursing tutors about pediatric pain is imperative to enable students and thus future nurses to be equipped with the necessary evidence-based knowledge of how to manage pediatric pain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141601254","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Pain Management Nursing
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1