Pub Date : 2026-01-07DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2608572
Raquel Gottfridsson, Emma Varkey, Axel Wolf, Kliment Gatzinsky, Jaquette Liljencrantz, Sven-Egron Thörn, Mats Börjesson, Daniel Arvidsson, Paulin Andréll
Introduction: Effects of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) on physical activity and self-efficacy remain unexplored.
Purpose: To evaluate effects of SCS on pain intensity, physical activity, health-related quality of life (HRQL), and self-efficacy among chronic neuropathic pain patients.
Methods: Randomized controlled trial, the first phase of a 3-part intervention study. Patients >18 years of age underwent SCS implantation after a test trial and were randomized 1:1 to active SCS or conventional medical management (CMM) with the SCS switched off. Data were collected at baseline and 3 months after implantation regarding pain (Numeric Rating Scale; NRS), physical activity (accelerometer), HRQL, and self-efficacy.
Results: Participants implanted with SCS (n=42) were randomized to active SCS (n=21) or CMM (n=21). Nineteen participants crossed over from CMM to active SCS due to lack of pain relief. Neuropathic pain intensity decreased significantly from baseline to 3 months (NRS 6.7 to 4.5; p <0.001) in patients with active SCS. Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity increased by 26 minutes/week (87%), although not statistically significant. Patients reported significant improvements in HRQL and self-efficacy.
Conclusion: SCS seems to reduce neuropathic pain intensity which might contribute to improvements in HRQL and self-efficacy. Low physical activity levels in this population should prompt targeted rehabilitation interventions.
Clinical trial registration: The https://clinicaltrials.gov/ identifier is NCT03740763 and the Västra Götaland Region (VGR) registry (https://www.researchweb.org/is/vgr/) identifier is 216271.
导言:脊髓刺激(SCS)对身体活动和自我效能的影响尚不清楚。目的:评价SCS对慢性神经性疼痛患者疼痛强度、体力活动、健康相关生活质量(HRQL)和自我效能的影响。方法:随机对照试验,3部分干预研究的第一阶段。18岁的患者在试验后接受了SCS植入,并按1:1的比例随机分配到激活SCS或关闭SCS的常规医疗管理(CMM)组。在基线和植入后3个月收集有关疼痛(数值评定量表;NRS)、身体活动(加速度计)、HRQL和自我效能的数据。结果:植入SCS的参与者(n=42)被随机分为活性SCS (n=21)或CMM (n=21)。19名参与者由于缺乏疼痛缓解而从CMM过渡到活跃的SCS。从基线到3个月神经性疼痛强度显著降低(NRS 6.7至4.5;p)结论:SCS似乎降低了神经性疼痛强度,这可能有助于改善HRQL和自我效能感。这一人群的低体力活动水平应促使有针对性的康复干预。临床试验注册:https://clinicaltrials.gov/标识符为NCT03740763, Västra Götaland区域(VGR)注册(https://www.researchweb.org/is/vgr/)标识符为216271。
{"title":"Effects of spinal cord stimulation on pain, physical activity, and self-efficacy among patients with neuropathic pain.","authors":"Raquel Gottfridsson, Emma Varkey, Axel Wolf, Kliment Gatzinsky, Jaquette Liljencrantz, Sven-Egron Thörn, Mats Börjesson, Daniel Arvidsson, Paulin Andréll","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2608572","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2025.2608572","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Effects of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) on physical activity and self-efficacy remain unexplored.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate effects of SCS on pain intensity, physical activity, health-related quality of life (HRQL), and self-efficacy among chronic neuropathic pain patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomized controlled trial, the first phase of a 3-part intervention study. Patients >18 years of age underwent SCS implantation after a test trial and were randomized 1:1 to active SCS or conventional medical management (CMM) with the SCS switched off. Data were collected at baseline and 3 months after implantation regarding pain (Numeric Rating Scale; NRS), physical activity (accelerometer), HRQL, and self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants implanted with SCS (n=42) were randomized to active SCS (n=21) or CMM (n=21). Nineteen participants crossed over from CMM to active SCS due to lack of pain relief. Neuropathic pain intensity decreased significantly from baseline to 3 months (NRS 6.7 to 4.5; <i>p</i> <0.001) in patients with active SCS. Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity increased by 26 minutes/week (87%), although not statistically significant. Patients reported significant improvements in HRQL and self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SCS seems to reduce neuropathic pain intensity which might contribute to improvements in HRQL and self-efficacy. Low physical activity levels in this population should prompt targeted rehabilitation interventions.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>The https://clinicaltrials.gov/ identifier is NCT03740763 and the Västra Götaland Region (VGR) registry (https://www.researchweb.org/is/vgr/) identifier is 216271.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145918219","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lumbar disc herniation is a common cause of low back pain leading to significant functional impairment. High-intensity, low-frequency pulsed electromagnetic field (Diamagnetic therapy) gained attention to treating several diseases. We report a 47-year-old man with severe post-traumatic low back pain radiating bilaterally to the lower limbs (VAS: 8; Douleur-Neuropathique-4: 5/10). MRI showed an annulus fibrosus fissure and a partially extruded left paramedian L4-L5 disc herniation compressing the dural sac. Pharmacological treatments (NSAIDs, corticosteroids, opioids, muscle relaxants) and physical therapy (Capacitive and resistive electric transfer therapy) provided no benefit. At presentation to our Pain Room, clinical findings included positive Lasegue at 30°, bilateral Valleix signs, paraspinal tenderness, and significant quality-of-life impairment (SF-36). The patient underwent a full course of diamagnetic therapy after providing written informed consent and following ethics committee approval. After 16 sessions (twice weekly, 20 minutes each; high-intensity fluids off/biostimulation), the VAS score decreased to 0/10 and the Douleur-Neuropathique-4 to 0/10, with MRI evidence of herniation resorption. This case illustrates that diamagnetic therapy improved the patient's clinical condition in refractory post-traumatic low disc herniation, supporting its potential as a promising noninvasive option for selected patients, although further controlled studies are required to confirm its efficacy.
{"title":"Resolution of post-traumatic lumbar disc herniation following diamagnetic therapy: a case report.","authors":"Vincenzo Rania, Davide Stanà, Caterina Palleria, Gianmarco Marcianò, Cristina Vocca, Luca Gallelli","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2026.2613635","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2026.2613635","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lumbar disc herniation is a common cause of low back pain leading to significant functional impairment. High-intensity, low-frequency pulsed electromagnetic field (Diamagnetic therapy) gained attention to treating several diseases. We report a 47-year-old man with severe post-traumatic low back pain radiating bilaterally to the lower limbs (VAS: 8; Douleur-Neuropathique-4: 5/10). MRI showed an annulus fibrosus fissure and a partially extruded left paramedian L4-L5 disc herniation compressing the dural sac. Pharmacological treatments (NSAIDs, corticosteroids, opioids, muscle relaxants) and physical therapy (Capacitive and resistive electric transfer therapy) provided no benefit. At presentation to our Pain Room, clinical findings included positive Lasegue at 30°, bilateral Valleix signs, paraspinal tenderness, and significant quality-of-life impairment (SF-36). The patient underwent a full course of diamagnetic therapy after providing written informed consent and following ethics committee approval. After 16 sessions (twice weekly, 20 minutes each; high-intensity fluids off/biostimulation), the VAS score decreased to 0/10 and the Douleur-Neuropathique-4 to 0/10, with MRI evidence of herniation resorption. This case illustrates that diamagnetic therapy improved the patient's clinical condition in refractory post-traumatic low disc herniation, supporting its potential as a promising noninvasive option for selected patients, although further controlled studies are required to confirm its efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145912631","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-06DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2608575
Matthew R Mulvey, Carole A Paley
Uncontrolled cancer pain remains one of the most common reasons for unscheduled medical care in the UK, yet primary and community care services often lack standardized approaches to management. This scoping review explored existing evidence on cancer pain management within primary and community care settings, focusing on integration strategies, barriers to access, and facilitators of equitable pain management, particularly in underserved populations. Six electronic databases were searched for studies published between 2000 and 2025. Thirty-two articles were included, encompassing systematic reviews, qualitative and quantitative studies, randomized controlled trials, and mixed-methods research. Findings were synthesized narratively under broad thematic headings. Considerable variability in pain management practices, limited GP training, workforce constraints, and fragmented communication between generalist and specialist services were identified. Digital technologies and patient education promoted better access, empowerment, and self-management, although adoption remained inconsistent. Socioeconomic inequities and digital exclusion continue to impede equitable pain control. Cancer pain management in primary care is hindered by systemic, educational, and structural barriers. Integration of pain and palliative care services, standardized assessment protocols, and targeted digital and educational interventions could enhance equity and effectiveness. Future research should evaluate integrated care models and the role of digital health in supporting community-based pain management.
{"title":"The challenges and opportunities for cancer pain management in primary and community care services: a scoping review.","authors":"Matthew R Mulvey, Carole A Paley","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2608575","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2025.2608575","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Uncontrolled cancer pain remains one of the most common reasons for unscheduled medical care in the UK, yet primary and community care services often lack standardized approaches to management. This scoping review explored existing evidence on cancer pain management within primary and community care settings, focusing on integration strategies, barriers to access, and facilitators of equitable pain management, particularly in underserved populations. Six electronic databases were searched for studies published between 2000 and 2025. Thirty-two articles were included, encompassing systematic reviews, qualitative and quantitative studies, randomized controlled trials, and mixed-methods research. Findings were synthesized narratively under broad thematic headings. Considerable variability in pain management practices, limited GP training, workforce constraints, and fragmented communication between generalist and specialist services were identified. Digital technologies and patient education promoted better access, empowerment, and self-management, although adoption remained inconsistent. Socioeconomic inequities and digital exclusion continue to impede equitable pain control. Cancer pain management in primary care is hindered by systemic, educational, and structural barriers. Integration of pain and palliative care services, standardized assessment protocols, and targeted digital and educational interventions could enhance equity and effectiveness. Future research should evaluate integrated care models and the role of digital health in supporting community-based pain management.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145912644","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-20DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2591598
Monica Mesiha, Maressa Cumbermack, Jamie Kim, Robert White, Tiffany Lin, John Rubin, Rohan Jotwani
Recent evidence shows that pro-inflammatory diets-high in saturated fats, added sugars, and ultra processed foods-have been linked to elevated levels of cytokines like interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF), showing a marked increase in systemic inflammation, disrupted immune function and altered anesthetic drug metabolism. These effects have been linked to prolonged recovery, impaired wound healing, and increased complication rates. Additionally, a pro-inflammatory diet changes the gut microbiome, impacting pain perception, opioid sensitivity and stress response by the gut-brain axis. On the contrary, an anti-inflammatory diet reduces inflammatory markers and is associated with a shorter hospital stay. This review synthesizes data from randomized controlled trials (RCT), meta-analyses, and mechanistic studies from 2000-2025, emphasizing literature on omega-3 fatty acids, specialized pro-resolving mediators (SPMs), and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). Targeted interventions such as education on nutrition and dietary assessment risk could enhance surgical recovery. Perioperative interventions discussed include pre/probiotic supplementation, omega-3 fatty acid administration, and also dietary counseling as part of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways.
{"title":"How pro-inflammatory diets influence perioperative outcomes.","authors":"Monica Mesiha, Maressa Cumbermack, Jamie Kim, Robert White, Tiffany Lin, John Rubin, Rohan Jotwani","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2591598","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2591598","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent evidence shows that pro-inflammatory diets-high in saturated fats, added sugars, and ultra processed foods-have been linked to elevated levels of cytokines like interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF), showing a marked increase in systemic inflammation, disrupted immune function and altered anesthetic drug metabolism. These effects have been linked to prolonged recovery, impaired wound healing, and increased complication rates. Additionally, a pro-inflammatory diet changes the gut microbiome, impacting pain perception, opioid sensitivity and stress response by the gut-brain axis. On the contrary, an anti-inflammatory diet reduces inflammatory markers and is associated with a shorter hospital stay. This review synthesizes data from randomized controlled trials (RCT), meta-analyses, and mechanistic studies from 2000-2025, emphasizing literature on omega-3 fatty acids, specialized pro-resolving mediators (SPMs), and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). Targeted interventions such as education on nutrition and dietary assessment risk could enhance surgical recovery. Perioperative interventions discussed include pre/probiotic supplementation, omega-3 fatty acid administration, and also dietary counseling as part of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"55-60"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12773469/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145557598","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-05DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2581561
Karina Alejandra Ortega Agon, Karol Nathalia Cabeza Diaz, Daniela Rangel Santos, Carlos Santiago Montaño Ochoa, Mario Andres Leotau, German William Rangel Jaimes, Juan Pablo Duran Anaya
Chronic perineal pain is a common complication among patients with cancer. Due to the complex innervation of this anatomical region, pain management is often challenging and significantly impacts patients' quality of life. We present the case of an elderly patient with advanced-stage rectosigmoid junction adenocarcinoma who experienced severe coccygeal-perineal oncologic pain. Despite a multimodal analgesic treatment approach, the patient exhibited refractoriness to conventional pain management. Consequently, an interventional analgesic approach was implemented using an impar ganglion block with botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A). Following the intervention, a significant reduction in pain intensity and opioid consumption was observed. This case highlights the therapeutic potential of the impar ganglion block with BoNT-A as an effective option for the management of refractory pelvic-perineal oncologic pain.
{"title":"Impar ganglion block with botulinum toxin in the management of perineal oncological pain: a case report.","authors":"Karina Alejandra Ortega Agon, Karol Nathalia Cabeza Diaz, Daniela Rangel Santos, Carlos Santiago Montaño Ochoa, Mario Andres Leotau, German William Rangel Jaimes, Juan Pablo Duran Anaya","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2581561","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2581561","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic perineal pain is a common complication among patients with cancer. Due to the complex innervation of this anatomical region, pain management is often challenging and significantly impacts patients' quality of life. We present the case of an elderly patient with advanced-stage rectosigmoid junction adenocarcinoma who experienced severe coccygeal-perineal oncologic pain. Despite a multimodal analgesic treatment approach, the patient exhibited refractoriness to conventional pain management. Consequently, an interventional analgesic approach was implemented using an impar ganglion block with botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A). Following the intervention, a significant reduction in pain intensity and opioid consumption was observed. This case highlights the therapeutic potential of the impar ganglion block with BoNT-A as an effective option for the management of refractory pelvic-perineal oncologic pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"11-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12773641/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145452614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Vinorelbine (VNR) frequently causes vasculitis and vascular pain during administration, potentially compromising treatment adherence and patient quality of life. This study aimed to identify risk factors and temporal distribution patterns for VNR associated with vasculitis and vascular pain, and to evaluate the prophylactic efficacy of NSAIDs and non-NSAID analgesics in patients receiving postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 49 non-small cell lung cancer patients who received cisplatin (CDDP) and VNR combination therapy. The treatment cycle was stratified into two temporal phases: "before day 8" (period between CDDP and VNR administration on day 1 and VNR monotherapy) and "after day 8" (period between VNR monotherapy and subsequent cycle initiation).
Results: Age under 65 years was significantly correlated with vasculitis and vascular pain occurrence (p = 0.003). The incidence rate was elevated during the "after day 8" period, with predominant manifestation during initial treatment cycles. Neither NSAIDs nor non-NSAID analgesics demonstrated significant prophylactic efficacy against these vascular adverse events.
Conclusion: Our findings identify age under 65 years as an independent risk factor for VNR associated with vasculitis and vascular pain. The markedly higher incidence observed during the "after day 8" period suggests that intravascular VNR concentration may be a critical pathophysiological determinant.
{"title":"Risk factors for vasculitis and vascular pain associated with cisplatin and vinorelbine in adjuvant chemotherapy.","authors":"Shunichi Ishii, Takenori Ichimura, Daisuke Ichikura, Noriko Hida, Shuichi Nawata","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2581556","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2581556","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vinorelbine (VNR) frequently causes vasculitis and vascular pain during administration, potentially compromising treatment adherence and patient quality of life. This study aimed to identify risk factors and temporal distribution patterns for VNR associated with vasculitis and vascular pain, and to evaluate the prophylactic efficacy of NSAIDs and non-NSAID analgesics in patients receiving postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 49 non-small cell lung cancer patients who received cisplatin (CDDP) and VNR combination therapy. The treatment cycle was stratified into two temporal phases: \"before day 8\" (period between CDDP and VNR administration on day 1 and VNR monotherapy) and \"after day 8\" (period between VNR monotherapy and subsequent cycle initiation).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Age under 65 years was significantly correlated with vasculitis and vascular pain occurrence (<i>p</i> = 0.003). The incidence rate was elevated during the \"after day 8\" period, with predominant manifestation during initial treatment cycles. Neither NSAIDs nor non-NSAID analgesics demonstrated significant prophylactic efficacy against these vascular adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings identify age under 65 years as an independent risk factor for VNR associated with vasculitis and vascular pain. The markedly higher incidence observed during the \"after day 8\" period suggests that intravascular VNR concentration may be a critical pathophysiological determinant.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"25-32"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12773614/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145401556","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-07DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2585780
Jeremy Lok Wei, Carmen Chi Min Cho, Wing Chung Law, Yan Hei Chan, Cheuk Man Chu, Tsz Yau Yuen
Purpose: Hilar nerve block has been recently described as a method of pain relief during percutaneous liver tumor ablation. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hilar nerve block.
Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, all patients who underwent image-guided percutaneous liver ablation with and without hilar nerve block from November 2022 to July 2024 in our institution were reviewed. Outcomes including technical success, complications, pain scores, intravenous analgesia and sedation requirements were compared between the nerve block and control groups.
Results: Thirty patients were included in the nerve block group and 33 patients were included in the control group. The nerve block group experienced less pain during ablation compared to the control group, both overall (mean pain score 3.9 vs 5.5 respectively, p = 0.018) and within the non-subcapsular tumor subgroup (mean pain score 3.5 vs 5.3 respectively, p = 0.018). The nerve block group required lower doses of fentanyl compared to the control group (mean dose 17.5 µg vs 35.6 µg, p = 0.001). Twelve patients in the nerve block group did not require any intravenous analgesia.
Conclusions: Hilar nerve block is a safe and effective technique for pain relief during percutaneous liver tumor ablation, which can lower the requirement for intravenous analgesics.
目的:肝门神经阻滞最近被描述为一种在经皮肝肿瘤消融过程中缓解疼痛的方法。我们的目的是评价肝门神经阻滞的有效性和安全性。方法:回顾性队列研究,回顾性分析我院2022年11月至2024年7月行图像引导下经皮肝消融伴或不伴肝门神经阻滞的患者。结果包括技术成功、并发症、疼痛评分、静脉镇痛和镇静需求在神经阻滞组和对照组之间进行比较。结果:神经阻滞组30例,对照组33例。与对照组相比,神经阻滞组在消融过程中经历了更少的疼痛,无论是总体(平均疼痛评分分别为3.9 vs 5.5, p = 0.018)还是非包膜下肿瘤亚组(平均疼痛评分分别为3.5 vs 5.3, p = 0.018)。与对照组相比,神经阻滞组需要更低剂量的芬太尼(平均剂量17.5µg vs 35.6µg, p = 0.001)。神经阻滞组12例患者不需要任何静脉镇痛。结论:肝门神经阻滞是一种安全有效的经皮肝肿瘤消融术镇痛技术,可降低静脉镇痛药物的需要量。
{"title":"Hilar nerve block for percutaneous liver tumor ablation.","authors":"Jeremy Lok Wei, Carmen Chi Min Cho, Wing Chung Law, Yan Hei Chan, Cheuk Man Chu, Tsz Yau Yuen","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2585780","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2585780","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Hilar nerve block has been recently described as a method of pain relief during percutaneous liver tumor ablation. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hilar nerve block.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, all patients who underwent image-guided percutaneous liver ablation with and without hilar nerve block from November 2022 to July 2024 in our institution were reviewed. Outcomes including technical success, complications, pain scores, intravenous analgesia and sedation requirements were compared between the nerve block and control groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients were included in the nerve block group and 33 patients were included in the control group. The nerve block group experienced less pain during ablation compared to the control group, both overall (mean pain score 3.9 vs 5.5 respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.018) and within the non-subcapsular tumor subgroup (mean pain score 3.5 vs 5.3 respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.018). The nerve block group required lower doses of fentanyl compared to the control group (mean dose 17.5 µg vs 35.6 µg, <i>p</i> = 0.001). Twelve patients in the nerve block group did not require any intravenous analgesia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hilar nerve block is a safe and effective technique for pain relief during percutaneous liver tumor ablation, which can lower the requirement for intravenous analgesics.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"33-38"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12773466/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145459329","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-10DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2587562
Angga Wilandika, Imam Sabarudin, Sajodin
Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of cold pack therapy in reducing pain during intravenous cannulation in pediatric patients, focusing on whether this non-pharmacological intervention offers significant advantages over standard care.
Patients & methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted using a post-eligibility block randomization method at a regional hospital in Bandung, Indonesia, involving 98 pediatric patients aged 3-6 years. Participants were purposively sampled and then randomly assigned into intervention (n = 49) and control (n = 49) groups using block randomization. The intervention group received cold pack therapy 2 minutes before intravenous cannulation, while the control group received standard care. Pain levels were assessed using the FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) Pain Scale. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test.
Results: Pain levels in the intervention group (3.31 ± 1.63) were significantly lower than in the control group (4.33 ± 1.56), with a p-value of 0.002. Mild pain was reported in 46.9% of the intervention group, compared to moderate pain in 57.1% of the control group.
Conclusions: Cold pack therapy is an effective and simple method for reducing pain during intravenous cannulation in pediatric patients. Its integration into routine care could enhance patient comfort and minimize procedural distress.
{"title":"A non-pharmacological approach to pain management in pediatrics: cold pack therapy during intravenous cannulation.","authors":"Angga Wilandika, Imam Sabarudin, Sajodin","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2587562","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2587562","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of cold pack therapy in reducing pain during intravenous cannulation in pediatric patients, focusing on whether this non-pharmacological intervention offers significant advantages over standard care.</p><p><strong>Patients & methods: </strong>A quasi-experimental study was conducted using a post-eligibility block randomization method at a regional hospital in Bandung, Indonesia, involving 98 pediatric patients aged 3-6 years. Participants were purposively sampled and then randomly assigned into intervention (<i>n</i> = 49) and control (<i>n</i> = 49) groups using block randomization. The intervention group received cold pack therapy 2 minutes before intravenous cannulation, while the control group received standard care. Pain levels were assessed using the FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) Pain Scale. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pain levels in the intervention group (3.31 ± 1.63) were significantly lower than in the control group (4.33 ± 1.56), with a p-value of 0.002. Mild pain was reported in 46.9% of the intervention group, compared to moderate pain in 57.1% of the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cold pack therapy is an effective and simple method for reducing pain during intravenous cannulation in pediatric patients. Its integration into routine care could enhance patient comfort and minimize procedural distress.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"17-23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12773638/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145482736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-19DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2585269
Richard B Lipton, Amit Bodhani, Xingyu Gao, Molly Duan, Lauren Wilson, Francois Cadiou, Pranav Gandhi, Krutika Jariwala-Parikh
Objective: Evaluate the real-world experience of ubrogepant versus triptans for the acute treatment of migraine among participants switching from an oral triptan.
Methods: UNIVERSE II was a prospective, longitudinal, survey-based, real-world study conducted in adult Migraine Buddy application users who self-reported a switch from an oral triptan to another oral triptan or ubrogepant. The 4-week study assessed treatment satisfaction, preference for the new treatment or previous triptan, and patient experience with new treatment against previous triptan.
Results: Of 694 participants, 211 were included after screening and accounting for dropouts (triptan, n = 100; ubrogepant, n = 111). At Day 30, significantly greater proportion of the ubrogepant cohort reported satisfaction with treating pain associated with migraine (69.4% vs 42.0%; adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 3.22; [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.80-5.88]; p < 0.001) and alleviating their most bothersome symptom (69.4% vs 42.0%; adjusted OR = 3.10; [95% CI, 1.75-5.60]; p < 0.001) compared with those who switched triptans. The ubrogepant cohort was more likely to prefer their new treatment to their prior triptan (75.7% vs 63.0%; adjusted OR = 1.93; [95% CI, 1.05-3.59]; p = 0.035) and reported better meaningful relief at 2 hours compared to prior triptan (75.7% vs 59.0%; adjusted OR = 2.30; [95% CI, 1.26-4.27]; p = 0.007).
Conclusion: This real-world study demonstrated people with migraine who switched from a triptan to ubrogepant reported better outcomes than those who switched to a different triptan.
目的:评估从口服曲坦类药物转换为偏头痛急性治疗的参与者中,增厚剂与曲坦类药物的实际经验。方法:UNIVERSE II是一项前瞻性的、纵向的、基于调查的、真实世界的研究,在成年偏头痛伙伴应用程序用户中进行,这些用户自我报告从口服曲坦类药物转向另一种口服曲坦类药物或增稠剂。这项为期4周的研究评估了治疗满意度、对新疗法或既往曲坦类药物的偏好,以及患者对新疗法与既往曲坦类药物的体验。结果:在694名参与者中,经过筛选和考虑退出后,211名参与者被纳入(曲坦类药物,n = 100;膨松类药物,n = 111)。在第30天,肥胖队列中报告偏头痛相关疼痛治疗满意度的比例显著增加(69.4% vs 42.0%;校正优势比[OR] = 3.22;[95%可信区间[CI], 1.80-5.88]; p p p = 0.035),与先前使用曲坦类药物相比,2小时时报告的有意义缓解更好(75.7% vs 59.0%;校正OR = 2.30; [95% CI, 1.26-4.27]; p = 0.007)。结论:这项现实世界的研究表明,偏头痛患者从曲坦类药物切换到增粗类药物的结果比切换到其他曲坦类药物的结果更好。
{"title":"Patient-centered outcomes in the acute treatment of migraine: a prospective, real-world, longitudinal survey study (UNIVERSE II) comparing migraine patients who switch from a prior triptan to another triptan or ubrogepant.","authors":"Richard B Lipton, Amit Bodhani, Xingyu Gao, Molly Duan, Lauren Wilson, Francois Cadiou, Pranav Gandhi, Krutika Jariwala-Parikh","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2585269","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2585269","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate the real-world experience of ubrogepant versus triptans for the acute treatment of migraine among participants switching from an oral triptan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>UNIVERSE II was a prospective, longitudinal, survey-based, real-world study conducted in adult Migraine Buddy application users who self-reported a switch from an oral triptan to another oral triptan or ubrogepant. The 4-week study assessed treatment satisfaction, preference for the new treatment or previous triptan, and patient experience with new treatment against previous triptan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 694 participants, 211 were included after screening and accounting for dropouts (triptan, <i>n</i> = 100; ubrogepant, <i>n</i> = 111). At Day 30, significantly greater proportion of the ubrogepant cohort reported satisfaction with treating pain associated with migraine (69.4% vs 42.0%; adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 3.22; [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.80-5.88]; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and alleviating their most bothersome symptom (69.4% vs 42.0%; adjusted OR = 3.10; [95% CI, 1.75-5.60]; <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared with those who switched triptans. The ubrogepant cohort was more likely to prefer their new treatment to their prior triptan (75.7% vs 63.0%; adjusted OR = 1.93; [95% CI, 1.05-3.59]; <i>p</i> = 0.035) and reported better meaningful relief at 2 hours compared to prior triptan (75.7% vs 59.0%; adjusted OR = 2.30; [95% CI, 1.26-4.27]; <i>p</i> = 0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This real-world study demonstrated people with migraine who switched from a triptan to ubrogepant reported better outcomes than those who switched to a different triptan.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"39-48"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12773619/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145550165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-01DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2581616
Jens Astrup, Finn Gyntelberg, Jes Olesen
Aims: This open-label non-placebo clinical trial was designed as an explorative test of a recent hypothesis suggesting a causative relation between neck muscle dyssynergia and pain in patients with chronic tension-type headache (TTH) and common whiplash (WL). A Dopamine agonist was used as test-treatment. The primary aim was to improve neck muscle dyssynergia and second to observe the effect on pain.
Patients & methods: Fifteen patients, comprising 8 tension-type headache and 7 common whiplash patients, all with significant neck muscle tenderness, were started on a standard Pramipexole treatment by 0.18 mg Pramipexole daily and increased by 0.18 mg weekly to 0.18 mg × 3 daily for maintenance. Weekly visits with measurements of head laser tracking (HLT) as indicator of neck muscle dyssynergia, total neck muscle tenderness score, and self-reported daily average headache and neck pain. Head laser tracking was compared to a control group of 8 untreated healthy persons.
Results: HLT normalized during treatment and clinical parameters of pain significantly improved.
Conclusion: This result provides preliminary support of the hypothesis of a pathogenetic relation between the dyssynergic neck muscle innervation and pain in TTH and common WL.
{"title":"Dopamine agonist treatment normalizes neck motor dyscoordination and relieves pain in chronic tension-type headache and common whiplash. A pilot study.","authors":"Jens Astrup, Finn Gyntelberg, Jes Olesen","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2581616","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2581616","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This open-label non-placebo clinical trial was designed as an explorative test of a recent hypothesis suggesting a causative relation between neck muscle dyssynergia and pain in patients with chronic tension-type headache (TTH) and common whiplash (WL). A Dopamine agonist was used as test-treatment. The primary aim was to improve neck muscle dyssynergia and second to observe the effect on pain.</p><p><strong>Patients & methods: </strong>Fifteen patients, comprising 8 tension-type headache and 7 common whiplash patients, all with significant neck muscle tenderness, were started on a standard Pramipexole treatment by 0.18 mg Pramipexole daily and increased by 0.18 mg weekly to 0.18 mg × 3 daily for maintenance. Weekly visits with measurements of head laser tracking (HLT) as indicator of neck muscle dyssynergia, total neck muscle tenderness score, and self-reported daily average headache and neck pain. Head laser tracking was compared to a control group of 8 untreated healthy persons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HLT normalized during treatment and clinical parameters of pain significantly improved.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This result provides preliminary support of the hypothesis of a pathogenetic relation between the dyssynergic neck muscle innervation and pain in TTH and common WL.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>EudraCT 2021-003574-31.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"49-54"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12773612/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145422437","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}