首页 > 最新文献

Pain management最新文献

英文 中文
Comparison of ultrasound-guided transforaminal epidural injection versus fluoroscopy-guided injection for lumbosacral herpes zoster: a noninferior analysis. 超声引导下经椎间孔硬膜外注射与透视引导下注射治疗腰骶部带状疱疹的比较:一项非隐性分析。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-20 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2026.2618654
Xiuhua Li, Liangliang He, Shuyue Zheng

Background: To evaluate efficacy and safety of ultrasound (US)-guided lumbar transforaminal epidural injection (TFEI) for relieving zoster-associated pain (ZAP) in lumbosacral nerves.

Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study was performed with 1:1 propensity matching to control cohort. Patients undergoing TFEI were included as a US cohort using US guidance and control cohort under fluoroscopy (FL) guidance. Primary endpoint was visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at 1 month after the procedure with a non-inferiority margin of 10 mm. Secondary outcomes included sensory blockade, procedure time, radiation exposure, adverse events, rescue analgesics, post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN) incidence, and EuroQoL Five-dimension (EQ-5D) scores.

Results: US cohort reported a mean VAS score of 33.52 ± 14.30 mm at 1 month, which was non-inferior to control cohort. PHN occurred in 12.5% of US cohort and 11.1% of FL cohort at 3 months after rash onset (p = 0.796). Trends in EQ-5D scores improved similarly between cohorts over time (all p > 0.05). US approach was associated with wider anesthetic dermatomes (p = 0.031), shorter procedure times (p < 0.001) and lower radiation exposure (p < 0.001). No serious adverse events were observed in either cohort.

Conclusions: US-guided lumbar TFEI was non-inferior to FL procedures. Its unique benefits supported its use in clinical routine practice.

背景:评价超声引导下经椎间孔硬膜外注射(TFEI)缓解腰骶神经带状疱疹相关疼痛(ZAP)的疗效和安全性。方法:采用回顾性观察队列研究,与对照队列进行1:1倾向匹配。接受TFEI的患者被纳入采用US引导的美国队列和在透视(FL)指导下的对照队列。主要终点是手术后1个月的视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分,非劣效裕度为10 mm。次要结局包括感觉阻滞、手术时间、辐射暴露、不良事件、抢救镇痛药、疱疹后神经痛(PHN)发生率和EuroQoL五维(EQ-5D)评分。结果:美国队列报告的1个月平均VAS评分为33.52±14.30 mm,不低于对照队列。在皮疹发病3个月后,12.5%的美国队列和11.1%的FL队列发生PHN (p = 0.796)。随着时间的推移,EQ-5D评分的趋势在队列之间也有类似的改善(p < 0.05)。US入路麻醉皮瓣更宽(p = 0.031),手术时间更短(p = 0.031)。结论:US引导腰椎TFEI不逊色于FL入路。其独特的益处支持其在临床常规实践中的使用。
{"title":"Comparison of ultrasound-guided transforaminal epidural injection versus fluoroscopy-guided injection for lumbosacral herpes zoster: a noninferior analysis.","authors":"Xiuhua Li, Liangliang He, Shuyue Zheng","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2026.2618654","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2026.2618654","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate efficacy and safety of ultrasound (US)-guided lumbar transforaminal epidural injection (TFEI) for relieving zoster-associated pain (ZAP) in lumbosacral nerves.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational cohort study was performed with 1:1 propensity matching to control cohort. Patients undergoing TFEI were included as a US cohort using US guidance and control cohort under fluoroscopy (FL) guidance. Primary endpoint was visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at 1 month after the procedure with a non-inferiority margin of 10 mm. Secondary outcomes included sensory blockade, procedure time, radiation exposure, adverse events, rescue analgesics, post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN) incidence, and EuroQoL Five-dimension (EQ-5D) scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>US cohort reported a mean VAS score of 33.52 ± 14.30 mm at 1 month, which was non-inferior to control cohort. PHN occurred in 12.5% of US cohort and 11.1% of FL cohort at 3 months after rash onset (<i>p</i> = 0.796). Trends in EQ-5D scores improved similarly between cohorts over time (all <i>p</i> > 0.05). US approach was associated with wider anesthetic dermatomes (<i>p</i> = 0.031), shorter procedure times (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and lower radiation exposure (<i>p</i> < 0.001). No serious adverse events were observed in either cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>US-guided lumbar TFEI was non-inferior to FL procedures. Its unique benefits supported its use in clinical routine practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146011645","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effectiveness of standard and culturally adapted pain neuroscience education for Hausa chronic neck pain: randomized controlled trial protocol. 标准和文化适应的疼痛神经科学教育对豪萨族慢性颈部疼痛的有效性:随机对照试验方案。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-19 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2026.2616210
Bashir Kaka, Sani Ahmad, Lawan Umar, Umar Abdulahi, Nazir B Mukhtar, Sokunbi G Oluwaleke

Background: Chronic nonspecific neck pain is a significant cause of disability among Hausa-speaking populations in northern Nigeria. While pain neuroscience education (PNE) is effective, previous local studies were limited.

Aim: This study aims to compare the effectiveness of translated standard PNE versus a culturally adapted PNE version for this population.

Methods: A single-blind randomized controlled trial will enroll 69 adults with chronic neck pain into three groups. All participants will receive 8 weeks of structured neck exercises (SNE), a standard physiotherapy regimen for chronic neck pain in the region focusing on range of motion, strengthening, and postural correction. Two groups will receive additional weekly sessions of either Standard Translated PNE or Culturally Adapted PNE, while the third group will receive Structured Neck Exercises only. Primary (neck-related disability) and secondary outcomes (pain intensity, pain comprehension, psychological factors, fear-avoidance beliefs and quality of life) will be measured at baseline, 4, 8, and 12 weeks.

Discussion: It is hypothesized that the culturally adapted PNE will yield superior outcomes due to its enhanced relevance and comprehension. The findings are expected to inform the development of effective, culturally tailored pain management strategies in sub-Saharan Africa, thereby advancing musculoskeletal care in the region.

Clinical trial registration: The Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/) identifier is PACTR202503884900037.

背景:慢性非特异性颈部疼痛是尼日利亚北部豪萨语人群致残的重要原因。虽然疼痛神经科学教育(PNE)是有效的,但以往的局部研究有限。目的:本研究的目的是比较翻译的标准PNE与文化适应的PNE版本对这一人群的有效性。方法:采用单盲随机对照试验,将69例慢性颈部疼痛成人患者分为三组。所有参与者将接受8周的结构化颈部运动(SNE),这是针对该区域慢性颈部疼痛的标准物理治疗方案,重点是活动范围,加强和姿势矫正。两组将接受标准翻译PNE或文化适应PNE的额外每周课程,而第三组将只接受结构化颈部练习。主要(颈部相关残疾)和次要结果(疼痛强度、疼痛理解、心理因素、恐惧回避信念和生活质量)将在基线、4、8和12周时进行测量。讨论:假设文化适应的PNE会产生更好的结果,因为它增强了相关性和理解力。研究结果有望为撒哈拉以南非洲地区制定有效的、文化上适合的疼痛管理策略提供信息,从而促进该地区的肌肉骨骼护理。临床试验注册:泛非临床试验注册中心(https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/)标识符为PACTR202503884900037。
{"title":"Effectiveness of standard and culturally adapted pain neuroscience education for Hausa chronic neck pain: randomized controlled trial protocol.","authors":"Bashir Kaka, Sani Ahmad, Lawan Umar, Umar Abdulahi, Nazir B Mukhtar, Sokunbi G Oluwaleke","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2026.2616210","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2026.2616210","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic nonspecific neck pain is a significant cause of disability among Hausa-speaking populations in northern Nigeria. While pain neuroscience education (PNE) is effective, previous local studies were limited.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to compare the effectiveness of translated standard PNE versus a culturally adapted PNE version for this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-blind randomized controlled trial will enroll 69 adults with chronic neck pain into three groups. All participants will receive 8 weeks of structured neck exercises (SNE), a standard physiotherapy regimen for chronic neck pain in the region focusing on range of motion, strengthening, and postural correction. Two groups will receive additional weekly sessions of either Standard Translated PNE or Culturally Adapted PNE, while the third group will receive Structured Neck Exercises only. Primary (neck-related disability) and secondary outcomes (pain intensity, pain comprehension, psychological factors, fear-avoidance beliefs and quality of life) will be measured at baseline, 4, 8, and 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>It is hypothesized that the culturally adapted PNE will yield superior outcomes due to its enhanced relevance and comprehension. The findings are expected to inform the development of effective, culturally tailored pain management strategies in sub-Saharan Africa, thereby advancing musculoskeletal care in the region.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>The Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/) identifier is PACTR202503884900037.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145998731","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction. 修正。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-19 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2026.2619358
{"title":"Correction.","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2026.2619358","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2026.2619358","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145998775","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Consumer perspectives on small group-delivered pain management programs: a qualitative content analysis of survey data. 消费者对小团体交付的疼痛管理方案的看法:调查数据的定性内容分析。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-18 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2026.2616211
Marelle K Wilson, Amelia K Searle, Dianne J Wilson, Shylie F Mackintosh

Aims: This study aimed to explore what consumers valued in pain management programs delivered in small groups, and how frequently group-related factors were raised spontaneously in their feedback at a pain management unit in South Australia.

Methods: Qualitative content analysis of feedback survey data from 109 consumers explored what they valued most and how frequently the group itself was mentioned. All categories were developed inductively, with only group-related codes informed by a recent systematic review. Respondents had attended one of four different programs, delivered in small groups, facilitated primarily by either a physiotherapist or psychologist.

Results: Five categories were identified: program content, the group itself, program structure, the facilitator, and positive changes. The group itself was the second most prevalent category among coded responses, highlighting its relative importance. Findings suggest that peer interaction among similar others and feeling socially safe may positively influence consumer experiences, even within smaller groups than typically reported in group pain management literature. Optimising opportunities for peer interaction and incorporating off-boarding strategies may further enhance engagement and outcomes.

Conclusion: This study highlights the relative importance of the group itself in small group-delivered pain programs and may contribute to improving outcomes for individuals with chronic pain.

目的:本研究旨在探讨消费者在小团体提供的疼痛管理项目中所看重的是什么,以及在南澳大利亚的一个疼痛管理单位,群体相关因素在他们的反馈中自发提出的频率。方法:对109名消费者的反馈调查数据进行定性内容分析,探讨消费者最看重的是什么以及群体本身被提及的频率。所有的分类都是归纳性的,只有通过最近的系统审查得出的与组相关的代码。受访者参加了四种不同的项目中的一种,这些项目以小组形式进行,主要由物理治疗师或心理学家提供帮助。结果:确定了五个类别:计划内容,小组本身,计划结构,推动者和积极的变化。在编码的回答中,这一组本身是第二常见的类别,突出了它的相对重要性。研究结果表明,同类之间的同伴互动和社会安全感可能会对消费者体验产生积极影响,即使是在比群体疼痛管理文献中通常报道的更小的群体中。优化同伴互动的机会,并纳入离职策略,可以进一步提高参与度和成果。结论:本研究强调了小组本身在小组疼痛项目中的相对重要性,并可能有助于改善慢性疼痛患者的预后。
{"title":"Consumer perspectives on small group-delivered pain management programs: a qualitative content analysis of survey data.","authors":"Marelle K Wilson, Amelia K Searle, Dianne J Wilson, Shylie F Mackintosh","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2026.2616211","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2026.2616211","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to explore what consumers valued in pain management programs delivered in small groups, and how frequently group-related factors were raised spontaneously in their feedback at a pain management unit in South Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative content analysis of feedback survey data from 109 consumers explored what they valued most and how frequently the group itself was mentioned. All categories were developed inductively, with only group-related codes informed by a recent systematic review. Respondents had attended one of four different programs, delivered in small groups, facilitated primarily by either a physiotherapist or psychologist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five categories were identified: program content, the group itself, program structure, the facilitator, and positive changes. The group itself was the second most prevalent category among coded responses, highlighting its relative importance. Findings suggest that peer interaction among similar others and feeling socially safe may positively influence consumer experiences, even within smaller groups than typically reported in group pain management literature. Optimising opportunities for peer interaction and incorporating off-boarding strategies may further enhance engagement and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the relative importance of the group itself in small group-delivered pain programs and may contribute to improving outcomes for individuals with chronic pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145998741","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Opioid-sparing by low-dose ketamine for endometriosis surgery. A single-center, prospective, randomized, trial. 小剂量氯胺酮用于子宫内膜异位症手术的阿片类药物节约。一项单中心、前瞻性、随机试验。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-18 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2026.2613800
Christian Vetter

Endometriosis affects 10% of women of childbearing age and 25-50% of infertile women worldwide. Although most patients with endometriosis are completely asymptomatic, there is still a significant proportion of patients, whose quality of life is impaired by the disease, resulting in chronic pelvic pain. However, there is a poor correlation between objective findings of significant endometriosis and pain severity. Opioids typically form part of a postoperative analgesic regimen. However, opioid tolerance, adverse effects, contraindications, or a combination of these factors may limit their use. As part of the multimodal regime, ketamine may play a critical role for patients undergoing surgery when postoperative pain is expected to be severe. It is most commonly used for acute pain management in settings involving trauma, the exacerbation of chronic painful conditions, and postsurgical pain, particularly in opioid-tolerant patients, generally at subanesthetic doses. Notably, in therapy-refractory pharmacological situations, surgical treatment of endometriosis with intraoperative low-dose ketamine could be helpful and may constitute an effective strategy for limiting disease recurrence. However, it is important to evaluate the significance of ketamine in endometriosis surgery for preventing chronic pain syndrome, which in turn would result in an improvement in the quality of life of patients with endometriosis.Clinical trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT06951802.

子宫内膜异位症影响全世界10%的育龄妇女和25-50%的不育妇女。虽然大多数子宫内膜异位症患者是完全无症状的,但仍有相当比例的患者,其生活质量因疾病而受损,导致慢性盆腔疼痛。然而,明显子宫内膜异位症的客观表现与疼痛严重程度之间的相关性很差。阿片类药物通常是术后镇痛方案的一部分。然而,阿片类药物耐受性、不良反应、禁忌症或这些因素的组合可能限制其使用。作为多模式治疗方案的一部分,氯胺酮可能在术后疼痛严重的手术患者中发挥关键作用。它最常用于涉及创伤、慢性疼痛加重和术后疼痛的急性疼痛管理,特别是阿片类药物耐受患者,通常在亚麻醉剂量下。值得注意的是,在药物治疗难治性的情况下,手术治疗子宫内膜异位症术中使用低剂量氯胺酮可能是有帮助的,并且可能是限制疾病复发的有效策略。然而,评估氯胺酮在子宫内膜异位症手术中预防慢性疼痛综合征的意义,从而改善子宫内膜异位症患者的生活质量是很重要的。临床试验注册:www.clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT06951802。
{"title":"Opioid-sparing by low-dose ketamine for endometriosis surgery. A single-center, prospective, randomized, trial.","authors":"Christian Vetter","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2026.2613800","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2026.2613800","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endometriosis affects 10% of women of childbearing age and 25-50% of infertile women worldwide. Although most patients with endometriosis are completely asymptomatic, there is still a significant proportion of patients, whose quality of life is impaired by the disease, resulting in chronic pelvic pain. However, there is a poor correlation between objective findings of significant endometriosis and pain severity. Opioids typically form part of a postoperative analgesic regimen. However, opioid tolerance, adverse effects, contraindications, or a combination of these factors may limit their use. As part of the multimodal regime, ketamine may play a critical role for patients undergoing surgery when postoperative pain is expected to be severe. It is most commonly used for acute pain management in settings involving trauma, the exacerbation of chronic painful conditions, and postsurgical pain, particularly in opioid-tolerant patients, generally at subanesthetic doses. Notably, in therapy-refractory pharmacological situations, surgical treatment of endometriosis with intraoperative low-dose ketamine could be helpful and may constitute an effective strategy for limiting disease recurrence. However, it is important to evaluate the significance of ketamine in endometriosis surgery for preventing chronic pain syndrome, which in turn would result in an improvement in the quality of life of patients with endometriosis.Clinical trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT06951802.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145998681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block in non-specific low back pain: an exploratory systematic review. 竖脊肌平面阻滞治疗非特异性腰痛的疗效和安全性:一项探索性系统综述。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-18 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2026.2613794
Maroua Slouma, Samara Zarati, Maissa Abbes, Noureddine Litaiem

Introduction: There is a lack of consolidated evidence to definitively establish the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for low back pain (LBP).Our review aimed to summarize the current published evidence regarding the analgesic efficacy and safety of ESPB in LBP.

Method: We conducted a systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The review protocol has been registered in PROSPERO.

Results: The literature search yielded 21 potentially relevant publications. 232 articles were excluded. The number of patients treated with ESPB was 501. The ESPB's efficacy in reducing the patient's perceived pain was demonstrated in 216 of 345 cases on the first day, 270 of 319 cases in the first month, and 265 of 295 cases in the third month. Exacerbation of pain was reported by 2 patients in the first month after ESPB. Side effects were reported in 5 cases.

Conclusion: Current evidence is limited to low-level studies. While preliminary findings showed that ESPB was a minimally invasive method that provided analgesia in patients with acute and chronic LBP with or without radicular pain, strong conclusions cannot be drawn. Future high-quality randomized controlled trials are necessary to guide clinical practice.

Protocol registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42025646263 identifier is CRD42025646263.

导语:目前还缺乏确凿的证据来确定超声引导下脊柱平面阻滞(ESPB)治疗腰痛(LBP)的有效性和安全性。我们的综述旨在总结目前发表的关于ESPB治疗LBP的镇痛疗效和安全性的证据。方法:我们按照PRISMA指南进行了系统评价。审查议定书已在普洛斯彼罗登记。结果:文献检索产生21篇可能相关的出版物。232项被排除在外。接受ESPB治疗的患者为501例。在345例患者中,第一天有216例,第一个月有270例,第三个月295例患者中有265例。2例患者在ESPB术后1个月内出现疼痛加重。副反应5例。结论:目前的证据仅限于低水平的研究。虽然初步研究结果表明ESPB是一种微创方法,可为急性和慢性腰痛患者提供镇痛,但尚不能得出强有力的结论。未来需要高质量的随机对照试验来指导临床实践。协议注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42025646263标识为CRD42025646263。
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block in non-specific low back pain: an exploratory systematic review.","authors":"Maroua Slouma, Samara Zarati, Maissa Abbes, Noureddine Litaiem","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2026.2613794","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2026.2613794","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is a lack of consolidated evidence to definitively establish the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for low back pain (LBP).Our review aimed to summarize the current published evidence regarding the analgesic efficacy and safety of ESPB in LBP.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The review protocol has been registered in PROSPERO.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature search yielded 21 potentially relevant publications. 232 articles were excluded. The number of patients treated with ESPB was 501. The ESPB's efficacy in reducing the patient's perceived pain was demonstrated in 216 of 345 cases on the first day, 270 of 319 cases in the first month, and 265 of 295 cases in the third month. Exacerbation of pain was reported by 2 patients in the first month after ESPB. Side effects were reported in 5 cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current evidence is limited to low-level studies. While preliminary findings showed that ESPB was a minimally invasive method that provided analgesia in patients with acute and chronic LBP with or without radicular pain, strong conclusions cannot be drawn. Future high-quality randomized controlled trials are necessary to guide clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Protocol registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42025646263 identifier is CRD42025646263.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145998773","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Aquatic therapy compared to standard care for chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. 水生疗法与标准治疗慢性腰痛的比较:一项随机对照试验。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-13 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2026.2613633
Nicolas Vaillancourt, Chanelle Montpetit, Brent Rosenstein, Maryse Fortin

Background: Anxiety, depression, and pain-related fears are highly prevalent among individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP). While aquatic therapy is a promising treatment modality for CLBP, its effects on psychological factors remain poorly understood.

Objective: To compare the effects of aquatic therapy (AT) versus standard care (SC) on psychological outcomes, pain, and disability in CLBP.

Methods: In this two-arm randomized controlled trial, 34 participants with CLBP were assigned to AT (n = 18) or SC (n = 16). Both groups received bi-weekly individual sessions over 10 weeks. Pain, disability, quality of life, anxiety, depression, pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, and sleep disturbance were assessed using the following validated questionnaires; Numerical Pain Rating Scale, Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index, Short-Form 12 Item Survey Questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia and Insomnia Severity Index, respectively.

Results: Mixed-design analysis of covariance revealed no significant group*time interactions for any outcomes (all p > 0.05). Both groups improved significantly in pain, disability, quality of life, pain catastrophizing, and anxiety (all p < 0.05). Only AT demonstrated significant reductions in kinesiophobia (p = 0.002) and sleep disturbance (p = 0.001).

Conclusions: Aquatic therapy may offer a more comfortable treatment alternative to address psychological factors associated with CLBP.

Clinical trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT05823857.

背景:焦虑、抑郁和疼痛相关的恐惧在慢性腰痛(CLBP)患者中非常普遍。虽然水疗法是CLBP的一种有希望的治疗方式,但其对心理因素的影响仍知之甚少。目的:比较水疗(AT)与标准治疗(SC)对CLBP患者心理结局、疼痛和残疾的影响。方法:在这项两组随机对照试验中,34名CLBP患者被分为AT组(n = 18)和SC组(n = 16)。两组在10周内每两周接受一次单独治疗。疼痛、残疾、生活质量、焦虑、抑郁、疼痛灾难化、运动恐惧症和睡眠障碍使用以下有效问卷进行评估;分别采用数值疼痛评定量表、改良Oswestry腰痛残疾指数、简易12项调查问卷、医院焦虑抑郁量表、疼痛灾难化量表、坦帕运动恐惧症量表和失眠严重程度指数。结果:混合设计协方差分析显示,任何结果均无显著的组*时间相互作用(均p < 0.05)。两组患者在疼痛、残疾、生活质量、疼痛灾难化、焦虑(均p = 0.002)和睡眠障碍(p = 0.001)方面均有显著改善。结论:水生疗法可能是解决CLBP相关心理因素的一种更舒适的治疗选择。临床试验注册:www.clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT05823857。
{"title":"Aquatic therapy compared to standard care for chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Nicolas Vaillancourt, Chanelle Montpetit, Brent Rosenstein, Maryse Fortin","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2026.2613633","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2026.2613633","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anxiety, depression, and pain-related fears are highly prevalent among individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP). While aquatic therapy is a promising treatment modality for CLBP, its effects on psychological factors remain poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effects of aquatic therapy (AT) versus standard care (SC) on psychological outcomes, pain, and disability in CLBP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this two-arm randomized controlled trial, 34 participants with CLBP were assigned to AT (<i>n</i> = 18) or SC (<i>n</i> = 16). Both groups received bi-weekly individual sessions over 10 weeks. Pain, disability, quality of life, anxiety, depression, pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, and sleep disturbance were assessed using the following validated questionnaires; Numerical Pain Rating Scale, Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index, Short-Form 12 Item Survey Questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia and Insomnia Severity Index, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mixed-design analysis of covariance revealed no significant group*time interactions for any outcomes (all <i>p</i> > 0.05). Both groups improved significantly in pain, disability, quality of life, pain catastrophizing, and anxiety (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). Only AT demonstrated significant reductions in kinesiophobia (<i>p</i> = 0.002) and sleep disturbance (<i>p</i> = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Aquatic therapy may offer a more comfortable treatment alternative to address psychological factors associated with CLBP.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT05823857.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145960094","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Thread carpal tunnel release vs. minimally invasive carpal tunnel release: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 螺纹腕管释放与微创腕管释放:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-12 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2026.2614279
Charles Ezenwanne, Seth Spicer, Hanna Brancaccio, Brandon Goodwin, David Rubin, Taylor Carmichael, Iris Zou, Sweta Mukhopadhyay, Gilbert Siu

Aims: The goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare outcomes between ultrasound-guided thread carpal tunnel release (TCTR) and other minimally invasive surgerical techniques (MIS), for the treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Materials/methods: This systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case series examining TCTR or MIS in adults (≥18 years) diagnosed with CTS were examined. Included studies must have reported pain, sensation, or functionality scores.

Results/conclusion: Five studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 389 patients. Mean follow-up for functionality and symptom severity scores were 8 months and 3.25 months for pain outcomes. Both TCTR and MIS demonstrated significant improvements in all outcomes. While within-group analayese suggested greater statistical robust improvement for symptom severity in the TCTR group (p < 0.01, Hedge's G = -3.25 [-4.42, -2.08], I2 = 83.1%) compared to MIS group (p = 0.05, Hedge's G = -2.16 [-4.32, -0.00], I2 = 99.3%), subgroup analysis did not demonstrate significant differences between TCTR and MIS for any outcomes. TCTR demonstrates comparable clinical outcomes to other minimally invasive carpal tunnel release techniques, suggesting that TCTR represents a viable minimally invasive option to the surgical management of CTS.

Protocol registration: The www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD42024598274.

目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是比较超声引导螺纹腕管松解术(TCTR)和其他微创外科技术(MIS)治疗腕管综合征的疗效。材料/方法:本系统评价按照PRISMA 2020指南进行。对诊断为CTS的成人(≥18岁)的TCTR或MIS进行随机对照试验、队列研究和病例系列研究。纳入的研究必须报告疼痛、感觉或功能评分。结果/结论:5项研究符合纳入标准,共纳入389例患者。功能和症状严重程度评分的平均随访时间为8个月,疼痛结果的平均随访时间为3.25个月。TCTR和MIS在所有结果中都显示出显著的改善。虽然组内分析显示,与MIS组相比,TCTR组在症状严重程度上有更大的统计学上的改善(p 2 = 83.1%) (p = 0.05, Hedge's G = -2.16 [-4.32, -0.00], I2 = 99.3%),但亚组分析并未显示TCTR和MIS在任何结果上有显著差异。TCTR的临床结果与其他微创腕管释放技术相当,表明TCTR是CTS手术治疗的可行的微创选择。协议注册:www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero标识为CRD42024598274。
{"title":"Thread carpal tunnel release vs. minimally invasive carpal tunnel release: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Charles Ezenwanne, Seth Spicer, Hanna Brancaccio, Brandon Goodwin, David Rubin, Taylor Carmichael, Iris Zou, Sweta Mukhopadhyay, Gilbert Siu","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2026.2614279","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2026.2614279","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare outcomes between ultrasound-guided thread carpal tunnel release (TCTR) and other minimally invasive surgerical techniques (MIS), for the treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.</p><p><strong>Materials/methods: </strong>This systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case series examining TCTR or MIS in adults (≥18 years) diagnosed with CTS were examined. Included studies must have reported pain, sensation, or functionality scores.</p><p><strong>Results/conclusion: </strong>Five studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 389 patients. Mean follow-up for functionality and symptom severity scores were 8 months and 3.25 months for pain outcomes. Both TCTR and MIS demonstrated significant improvements in all outcomes. While within-group analayese suggested greater statistical robust improvement for symptom severity in the TCTR group (<i>p</i> < 0.01, Hedge's G = -3.25 [-4.42, -2.08], I<sup>2</sup> = 83.1%) compared to MIS group (<i>p</i> = 0.05, Hedge's G = -2.16 [-4.32, -0.00], I<sup>2</sup> = 99.3%), subgroup analysis did not demonstrate significant differences between TCTR and MIS for any outcomes. TCTR demonstrates comparable clinical outcomes to other minimally invasive carpal tunnel release techniques, suggesting that TCTR represents a viable minimally invasive option to the surgical management of CTS.</p><p><strong>Protocol registration: </strong>The www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD42024598274.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145952728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of respiratory muscle training on symptoms of fibromyalgia: a systematic review with meta-analysis. 呼吸肌训练对纤维肌痛症状的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-10 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2026.2614281
Alice Torres Pontes, Cristiano Carvalho, Thatiane Izabele Ribeiro Santos, Ana Beatriz Ramalho de Araújo, Ana Beatriz Pereira de Araújo Cavalcanti, Mariana Arias Avila, Danilo Harudy Kamonseki, Ana Claudia Muniz Renno

This systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of respiratory muscle training (RMT) on symptoms of fibromyalgia (FM). Searches were conducted in Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, CINAHL, and PEDro for studies published up to November 2025. Randomized controlled trials comparing RMT to control conditions in individuals with FM were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool, and the quality of evidence was analyzed using the GRADE. Mean differences (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Four studies were included; with meta-analyses conducted on two of them. RMT was superior to the control group at improving pain (MD: -2.98; 95% CI: -3.17 to -1.60), quality of life (MD: -1.09; 95% CI: -1.61 to -0.56), fatigue (MD: -1.16; 95% CI: -1.69 to -0.63), anxiety (MD: -0.60; 95% CI: -1.10 to -0.03), and sleep quality (MD: -3.93; 95% CI: -7.06 to -0.80), and maximal occlusion pressure (MD: 2.08; 95% CI: 1.58 to 2.58). However, the certainty of evidence for these findings was very low according to the GRADE approach. In conclusion, RMT may lead to improvements in several FM-related symptoms, but the current evidence is insufficient for clinical recommendations, and high-quality trials are urgently needed.Protocol registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD42023445488.

本系统综述与荟萃分析旨在探讨呼吸肌训练(RMT)对纤维肌痛(FM)症状的影响。在Medline/PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science、SCOPUS、CINAHL和PEDro中检索到2025年11月之前发表的研究。纳入了比较RMT与FM患者对照条件的随机对照试验。使用Cochrane工具评估偏倚风险,使用GRADE分析证据质量。计算平均差值(MD)和95%置信区间(CI)。纳入了四项研究;并对其中两人进行了荟萃分析。RMT在改善疼痛(MD: -2.98; 95% CI: -3.17至-1.60)、生活质量(MD: -1.09; 95% CI: -1.61至-0.56)、疲劳(MD: -1.16; 95% CI: -1.69至-0.63)、焦虑(MD: -0.60; 95% CI: -1.10至-0.03)、睡眠质量(MD: -3.93; 95% CI: -7.06至-0.80)和最大咬合压力(MD: 2.08; 95% CI: 1.58至2.58)方面优于对照组。然而,根据GRADE方法,这些发现的证据的确定性非常低。综上所述,RMT可能导致一些fm相关症状的改善,但目前的证据不足以作为临床推荐,迫切需要高质量的试验。协议注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero标识为CRD42023445488。
{"title":"Effect of respiratory muscle training on symptoms of fibromyalgia: a systematic review with meta-analysis.","authors":"Alice Torres Pontes, Cristiano Carvalho, Thatiane Izabele Ribeiro Santos, Ana Beatriz Ramalho de Araújo, Ana Beatriz Pereira de Araújo Cavalcanti, Mariana Arias Avila, Danilo Harudy Kamonseki, Ana Claudia Muniz Renno","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2026.2614281","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2026.2614281","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of respiratory muscle training (RMT) on symptoms of fibromyalgia (FM). Searches were conducted in Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, CINAHL, and PEDro for studies published up to November 2025. Randomized controlled trials comparing RMT to control conditions in individuals with FM were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool, and the quality of evidence was analyzed using the GRADE. Mean differences (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Four studies were included; with meta-analyses conducted on two of them. RMT was superior to the control group at improving pain (MD: -2.98; 95% CI: -3.17 to -1.60), quality of life (MD: -1.09; 95% CI: -1.61 to -0.56), fatigue (MD: -1.16; 95% CI: -1.69 to -0.63), anxiety (MD: -0.60; 95% CI: -1.10 to -0.03), and sleep quality (MD: -3.93; 95% CI: -7.06 to -0.80), and maximal occlusion pressure (MD: 2.08; 95% CI: 1.58 to 2.58). However, the certainty of evidence for these findings was very low according to the GRADE approach. In conclusion, RMT may lead to improvements in several FM-related symptoms, but the current evidence is insufficient for clinical recommendations, and high-quality trials are urgently needed.<b>Protocol registration:</b> https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD42023445488.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145948962","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Morphine-associated wooden chest syndrome in palliative care: a case report. 姑息治疗中吗啡相关木胸综合征1例报告。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-09 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2026.2614278
Alia Alawneh, Ammar Aloqaily, Mohammad Al-Oakily

Wooden chest syndrome (WCS) is a rare, life-threatening complication of opioid use, characterized by chest wall rigidity and respiratory compromise. While most commonly associated with rapid intravenous fentanyl, we report a case of WCS following intravenous morphine and midazolam administration in a palliative care patient with metastatic lung sarcoma. The patient, who had a "do-not-intubate" (DNI) order, received morphine and midazolam for severe pain and dyspnea. Shortly after administration, he developed acute rigidity, including neck extension and trismus, consistent with WCS. Despite further sedative and analgesic administration, respiratory distress worsened leading to patient's death. The case highlights the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of WCS in palliative care, particularly when airway interventions are limited by goals-of-care directives. It underscores the need for heightened clinical awareness and the development of alternative management strategies for WCS when intubation is contraindicated, as well as the potential role of the interaction between morphine and midazolam in triggering this syndrome.

木胸综合征(WCS)是一种罕见的危及生命的阿片类药物使用并发症,其特征是胸壁僵硬和呼吸损害。虽然最常见的是快速静脉注射芬太尼,但我们报告了一例转移性肺肉瘤姑息治疗患者静脉注射吗啡和咪达唑仑后发生WCS的病例。患者有“不插管”(DNI)命令,接受吗啡和咪达唑仑治疗严重疼痛和呼吸困难。给药后不久,患者出现急性强直,包括颈部伸展和牙关紧闭,符合WCS。尽管进一步给予镇静和镇痛,呼吸窘迫恶化导致患者死亡。该病例突出了WCS在姑息治疗中的诊断和治疗挑战,特别是当气道干预受到护理目标指示的限制时。它强调了在有插管禁忌时需要提高临床意识和制定WCS的替代管理策略,以及吗啡和咪达唑仑之间相互作用在引发该综合征中的潜在作用。
{"title":"Morphine-associated wooden chest syndrome in palliative care: a case report.","authors":"Alia Alawneh, Ammar Aloqaily, Mohammad Al-Oakily","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2026.2614278","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2026.2614278","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Wooden chest syndrome (WCS) is a rare, life-threatening complication of opioid use, characterized by chest wall rigidity and respiratory compromise. While most commonly associated with rapid intravenous fentanyl, we report a case of WCS following intravenous morphine and midazolam administration in a palliative care patient with metastatic lung sarcoma. The patient, who had a \"do-not-intubate\" (DNI) order, received morphine and midazolam for severe pain and dyspnea. Shortly after administration, he developed acute rigidity, including neck extension and trismus, consistent with WCS. Despite further sedative and analgesic administration, respiratory distress worsened leading to patient's death. The case highlights the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of WCS in palliative care, particularly when airway interventions are limited by goals-of-care directives. It underscores the need for heightened clinical awareness and the development of alternative management strategies for WCS when intubation is contraindicated, as well as the potential role of the interaction between morphine and midazolam in triggering this syndrome.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145945617","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Pain management
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1