Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-01-21DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2451605
Darwin Luna, Gabrielle Hettie, Luke Pirrotta, Vafi Salmasi, Jennifer M Hah
Aim: We aimed to evaluate real-world outcomes of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) used to treat chronic neuropathic pain (CNP) at a tertiary pain management center.
Methods: Thirty adults who underwent PNS for CNP between June 2015 and September 2021 completed pain and psychosocial assessments in the 6 months before, and 2-3 years after PNS treatment. Pain intensity was measured using the NIH Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity Short From (3A). Psychosocial outcomes including depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbance were also measured.
Results: Prior to receiving PNS, long-term responders reported significantly fewer depressive symptoms compared to non-responders (PROMIS depression t-score 50.3 [10.7] vs 57.9 [8.9]; p-value = 0.05). Eleven participants (36.7%) reported long-term treatment response. There was a significantly greater improvement in pain intensity among responders compared to non-responders who reported increased pain (PROMIS Pain Intensity score -9.0 [-4.2] vs. +3.1[+3.2]; p-value < 0.0001).
Conclusions: Patients report clinically meaningful long-term pain relief after receiving PNS through both 60-day and permanent implant systems, with significant reductions in pain intensity observed in long-term responders. Long-term responders reported fewer depressive symptoms compared to non-responders prior to receiving therapy, emphasizing the importance of psychological screening and psychological optimization prior to receiving PNS.
{"title":"Real-world long-term outcomes of peripheral nerve stimulation: a prospective observational study.","authors":"Darwin Luna, Gabrielle Hettie, Luke Pirrotta, Vafi Salmasi, Jennifer M Hah","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2451605","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2451605","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>We aimed to evaluate real-world outcomes of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) used to treat chronic neuropathic pain (CNP) at a tertiary pain management center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty adults who underwent PNS for CNP between June 2015 and September 2021 completed pain and psychosocial assessments in the 6 months before, and 2-3 years after PNS treatment. Pain intensity was measured using the NIH Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity Short From (3A). Psychosocial outcomes including depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbance were also measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prior to receiving PNS, long-term responders reported significantly fewer depressive symptoms compared to non-responders (PROMIS depression t-score 50.3 [10.7] vs 57.9 [8.9]; p-value = 0.05). Eleven participants (36.7%) reported long-term treatment response. There was a significantly greater improvement in pain intensity among responders compared to non-responders who reported increased pain (PROMIS Pain Intensity score -9.0 [-4.2] vs. +3.1[+3.2]; p-value < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients report clinically meaningful long-term pain relief after receiving PNS through both 60-day and permanent implant systems, with significant reductions in pain intensity observed in long-term responders. Long-term responders reported fewer depressive symptoms compared to non-responders prior to receiving therapy, emphasizing the importance of psychological screening and psychological optimization prior to receiving PNS.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"37-44"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11801347/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143009687","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-01-30DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2459594
Alvin Leenus, Rayaan Rahman, Elad Dana, Cody Tran, Duncan Westwood, Evgeny E Osokin, Yasmine Hoydonckx, Massieh Moayedi, Salman Hirani, James S Khan
Objectives: To systematically review and conduct a meta-analysis of studies on peripheral magnetic stimulation (PMS) for fibromyalgia (FM) treatment.
Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINHAL, Web of Science, and ProQuest databases were searched from inception to July 2023 for studies in adult patients with FM treated with PMS. Studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation were excluded.
Results: Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (n = 279 patients) were identified and included in the review. PMS regimens varied, ranging from 8 to 40 min per session over 3-84 days. All studies compared PMS to a visually and physically identical sham device without magnetic fields. Most of the included studies demonstrated positive findings for PMS on pain and functional outcomes. In our meta-analysis, PMS significantly reduced pain scores within 1-3 months (mean difference -1.86 on NRS, 95% confidence interval -2.85 to -0.87, p = 0.0002, I2 = 68%, 4 studies [154 participants], low quality of evidence), but not at ≥3 months (low quality of evidence). Minimal adverse effects were reported.
Discussion: Evidence for PMS use in FM is encouraging for short-term benefit. However, heterogeneous patient populations, varied PMS regimens, and limited number of studies are important limitations. Large, high-quality RCTs are needed to confirm PMS benefits and to make definitive recommendations.
Protocol registration: PROSPERO Identifier is CRD42021235164.
{"title":"Peripheral magnetic stimulation for the treatment of fibromyalgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Alvin Leenus, Rayaan Rahman, Elad Dana, Cody Tran, Duncan Westwood, Evgeny E Osokin, Yasmine Hoydonckx, Massieh Moayedi, Salman Hirani, James S Khan","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2459594","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2459594","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To systematically review and conduct a meta-analysis of studies on peripheral magnetic stimulation (PMS) for fibromyalgia (FM) treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINHAL, Web of Science, and ProQuest databases were searched from inception to July 2023 for studies in adult patients with FM treated with PMS. Studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (<i>n</i> = 279 patients) were identified and included in the review. PMS regimens varied, ranging from 8 to 40 min per session over 3-84 days. All studies compared PMS to a visually and physically identical sham device without magnetic fields. Most of the included studies demonstrated positive findings for PMS on pain and functional outcomes. In our meta-analysis, PMS significantly reduced pain scores within 1-3 months (mean difference -1.86 on NRS, 95% confidence interval -2.85 to -0.87, <i>p</i> = 0.0002, I<sup>2</sup> = 68%, 4 studies [154 participants], low quality of evidence), but not at ≥3 months (low quality of evidence). Minimal adverse effects were reported.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Evidence for PMS use in FM is encouraging for short-term benefit. However, heterogeneous patient populations, varied PMS regimens, and limited number of studies are important limitations. Large, high-quality RCTs are needed to confirm PMS benefits and to make definitive recommendations.</p><p><strong>Protocol registration: </strong>PROSPERO Identifier is CRD42021235164.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"45-53"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11801343/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143067186","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-02-02DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2459052
Gary Schwartz, Jeffrey Gonzales, O'Dane Brady
{"title":"Plain language summary: Phase 3 study of a pain medication (liposomal bupivacaine) for pain relief after foot surgery.","authors":"Gary Schwartz, Jeffrey Gonzales, O'Dane Brady","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2459052","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2459052","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"5-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11801353/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143080771","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-01-22DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2457316
Soun Sheen, Joy Choo, Billy Huh, Matthew Chung
Introduction: The QTc prolongation effect of methadone has been extensively studied at higher doses commonly used in opioid dependence maintenance therapy, but evidence remains limited regarding its impact at the lower doses typically prescribed for cancer pain. This study aims to evaluate the effect of oral methadone on QTc intervals in cancer pain patients.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on adult patients initiated on oral methadone therapy for cancer. Pre- and post-methadone QTc intervals, obtained within six months before and between six to twelve months after methadone initiation, respectively, were compared. The proportion of patients with QTc intervals greater than 450 msec and 500 msec before and after methadone therapy were compared.
Results: Among the total of 310 patients, the mean pre-methadone QTc was 384.5 ± 37.8 msec (95% CI 380.3, 388.7) and the mean post-methadone QTc was 388.5 ± 43.4 msec (95% CI 383.6, 393.3). No statistically significant difference in QTc interval was observed (p = 0.1). The proportion of patients with a QTc greater than 450 msec and 500 msec pre- and post-methadone were also not statistically different.
Conclusion: Lower doses of oral methadone for cancer pain do not result in significant QTc prolongation.
{"title":"The effect of oral methadone on the QTc interval in cancer pain patients.","authors":"Soun Sheen, Joy Choo, Billy Huh, Matthew Chung","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2457316","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2457316","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The QTc prolongation effect of methadone has been extensively studied at higher doses commonly used in opioid dependence maintenance therapy, but evidence remains limited regarding its impact at the lower doses typically prescribed for cancer pain. This study aims to evaluate the effect of oral methadone on QTc intervals in cancer pain patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on adult patients initiated on oral methadone therapy for cancer. Pre- and post-methadone QTc intervals, obtained within six months before and between six to twelve months after methadone initiation, respectively, were compared. The proportion of patients with QTc intervals greater than 450 msec and 500 msec before and after methadone therapy were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the total of 310 patients, the mean pre-methadone QTc was 384.5 ± 37.8 msec (95% CI 380.3, 388.7) and the mean post-methadone QTc was 388.5 ± 43.4 msec (95% CI 383.6, 393.3). No statistically significant difference in QTc interval was observed (<i>p</i> = 0.1). The proportion of patients with a QTc greater than 450 msec and 500 msec pre- and post-methadone were also not statistically different.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lower doses of oral methadone for cancer pain do not result in significant QTc prolongation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"21-25"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11801344/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143024401","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-12-18DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2024.2442292
Tariq G Pulskamp, Lucy M Johnson, Daniel J Berlau
Effective pain management has long been hindered by the limitations and risks associated with opioid analgesics, necessitating the exploration of novel, non-opioid alternatives. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar during October and November 2024 to identify studies on emerging non-opioid pain management therapeutics. This review evaluates three promising classes of mechanism-specific therapeutics: nerve growth factor (NGF) monoclonal antibodies, transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) antagonists, and selective sodium channel blockers. By targeting distinct pathways involved in pain sensation, these therapies aim to provide relief for various pain types, including chronic, inflammatory, and neuropathic pain, with potentially fewer side effects. Through a detailed analysis of their mechanisms of action and current evidence, this review highlights the clinical potential of each class, addressing both their efficacy and safety challenges. Ultimately, these emerging therapies represent significant advancements in non-opioid pain management, with the potential to reshape standard approaches to patient care.
{"title":"Novel non-opioid analgesics in pain management.","authors":"Tariq G Pulskamp, Lucy M Johnson, Daniel J Berlau","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2024.2442292","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2024.2442292","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effective pain management has long been hindered by the limitations and risks associated with opioid analgesics, necessitating the exploration of novel, non-opioid alternatives. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar during October and November 2024 to identify studies on emerging non-opioid pain management therapeutics. This review evaluates three promising classes of mechanism-specific therapeutics: nerve growth factor (NGF) monoclonal antibodies, transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) antagonists, and selective sodium channel blockers. By targeting distinct pathways involved in pain sensation, these therapies aim to provide relief for various pain types, including chronic, inflammatory, and neuropathic pain, with potentially fewer side effects. Through a detailed analysis of their mechanisms of action and current evidence, this review highlights the clinical potential of each class, addressing both their efficacy and safety challenges. Ultimately, these emerging therapies represent significant advancements in non-opioid pain management, with the potential to reshape standard approaches to patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"641-651"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11702995/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142847078","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-12-23DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2024.2442898
Pedro Iván Arias-Vázquez, Russell Arcila-Novelo, Mauro Nicolás Guzzardo, Duilio Román Guzzardo, Miguel Ángel Nazul Ake-Montiel, André Sulub-Herrera
Background: The aims of this review were to identify and to analyze the clinical studies that used subcutaneous injections of dextrose for treating musculoskeletal pain, in order to establish an overview.
Methods: A systematic search was carried out in scientific databases including Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PUBMED and other sources, up until March 2024. We included clinical studies that used subcutaneous injections of dextrose in the treatment of individuals with musculoskeletal pain associated with tendinopathies, enthesopathy, osteoarthritis, ligament sprains, muscle strains or bursitis of various locations.
Results: Twenty studies that met the criteria were included in this review; of those, 13 were randomized clinical trials, one non-randomized comparative study and six were case series studies, comprising a total of 1226 patients. In all included studies, efficacy in pain reduction was reported in the groups treated with dextrose when comparing evaluations at baseline, short term and medium term.
Conclusions: Subcutaneous injections of dextrose could be a beneficial treatment for reducing musculoskeletal pain; however, factors such as the high heterogeneity in the treatment schemes, uncertainty in the mechanisms of action and the level of evidence found, indicate that this technique is still under development.
背景:本综述的目的是识别和分析使用皮下注射葡萄糖治疗肌肉骨骼疼痛的临床研究,以建立一个概述。方法:系统检索截至2024年3月的科学数据库,包括Web of Science、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、PUBMED等。我们纳入了使用葡萄糖皮下注射治疗与肌腱病、骨髓炎、骨关节炎、韧带扭伤、肌肉拉伤或不同部位滑囊炎相关的肌肉骨骼疼痛的临床研究。结果:本综述纳入了20项符合标准的研究;其中13项为随机临床试验,1项为非随机比较研究,6项为病例系列研究,共纳入1226例患者。在所有纳入的研究中,在比较基线、短期和中期评估时,用葡萄糖治疗的组报告了疼痛减轻的疗效。结论:皮下注射葡萄糖可有效减轻骨骼肌疼痛;然而,诸如治疗方案的高度异质性、作用机制的不确定性以及所发现的证据水平等因素表明,该技术仍处于发展阶段。
{"title":"Subcutaneous injections of dextrose in musculoskeletal pain, a potential therapeutic intervention: scoping review.","authors":"Pedro Iván Arias-Vázquez, Russell Arcila-Novelo, Mauro Nicolás Guzzardo, Duilio Román Guzzardo, Miguel Ángel Nazul Ake-Montiel, André Sulub-Herrera","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2024.2442898","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2024.2442898","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aims of this review were to identify and to analyze the clinical studies that used subcutaneous injections of dextrose for treating musculoskeletal pain, in order to establish an overview.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was carried out in scientific databases including Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PUBMED and other sources, up until March 2024. We included clinical studies that used subcutaneous injections of dextrose in the treatment of individuals with musculoskeletal pain associated with tendinopathies, enthesopathy, osteoarthritis, ligament sprains, muscle strains or bursitis of various locations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty studies that met the criteria were included in this review; of those, 13 were randomized clinical trials, one non-randomized comparative study and six were case series studies, comprising a total of 1226 patients. In all included studies, efficacy in pain reduction was reported in the groups treated with dextrose when comparing evaluations at baseline, short term and medium term.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Subcutaneous injections of dextrose could be a beneficial treatment for reducing musculoskeletal pain; however, factors such as the high heterogeneity in the treatment schemes, uncertainty in the mechanisms of action and the level of evidence found, indicate that this technique is still under development.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"653-663"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11703374/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142877645","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-12-23DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2024.2443380
John DesRochers, Samantha Fry, Arwa Khadr, Neel Rana, Gilbert Siu
Aims: Post-mastectomy pain syndrome is a common postoperative complication that can impact patient quality of life and function. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness of cryoneurolysis as an intervention for the management of post-mastectomy pain.
Methods: A prospero-registered systematic review was performed following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. An initial screening consisted of 53 articles imported from the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus. Google Scholar and WorldCat were also searched to pull any further articles.
Results: Three clinical trials, one case series, and one case report were included. Primary outcome measure of patient reported pain score (VAS or NRS) showed clinically significant reduction in pain in all five studies. Three of the studies also reported reduction in opioid use with cryoneurolysis intervention. A pooled effect size of Hedges g = -0.963, (95% CI [-1.55, -0.373]), with heterogeneity (I2 = 0.70).
Conclusion: Cryoneurolysis intervention shows promising and clinically significant relief in post-mastectomy pain in patients and further studies are encouraged.
目的:乳房切除术后疼痛综合征是一种常见的术后并发症,可影响患者的生活质量和功能。本系统综述的目的是评估冷冻神经松解术作为治疗乳房切除术后疼痛的干预措施的有效性。方法:按照PRISMA 2020指南进行普洛斯普洛斯注册的系统评价。初步筛选包括从以下数据库导入的53篇文章:PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane和Scopus。谷歌Scholar和WorldCat也被搜索以获取更多的文章。结果:纳入3项临床试验,1个病例系列,1例病例报告。患者报告疼痛评分(VAS或NRS)的主要结局指标显示,在所有五项研究中,疼痛均有临床显著减轻。其中三项研究还报告了在冷冻神经溶解干预下阿片类药物使用的减少。Hedges的综合效应大小g = -0.963, (95% CI[-1.55, -0.373]),存在异质性(I2 = 0.70)。结论:冷冻神经溶解干预在缓解乳房切除术后患者疼痛方面具有临床意义,值得进一步研究。
{"title":"Cryoneurolysis for management of post-mastectomy pain: a systematic review.","authors":"John DesRochers, Samantha Fry, Arwa Khadr, Neel Rana, Gilbert Siu","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2024.2443380","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2024.2443380","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Post-mastectomy pain syndrome is a common postoperative complication that can impact patient quality of life and function. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness of cryoneurolysis as an intervention for the management of post-mastectomy pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospero-registered systematic review was performed following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. An initial screening consisted of 53 articles imported from the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus. Google Scholar and WorldCat were also searched to pull any further articles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three clinical trials, one case series, and one case report were included. Primary outcome measure of patient reported pain score (VAS or NRS) showed clinically significant reduction in pain in all five studies. Three of the studies also reported reduction in opioid use with cryoneurolysis intervention. A pooled effect size of Hedges g = -0.963, (95% CI [-1.55, -0.373]), with heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 0.70).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cryoneurolysis intervention shows promising and clinically significant relief in post-mastectomy pain in patients and further studies are encouraged.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"665-671"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142882481","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-12-12DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2024.2430832
Dawn C Buse, Roger Cady, Amaal J Starling, Meghan Buzby, Kevin Lenaburg
{"title":"Headache-related stigma and quality of life in adults with frequent headaches/migraine and frequent medication use: a plain language summary.","authors":"Dawn C Buse, Roger Cady, Amaal J Starling, Meghan Buzby, Kevin Lenaburg","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2024.2430832","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2024.2430832","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"599-610"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730118/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142818824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-12-06DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2024.2436836
Cindy McIntyre, Jerry Draper-Rodi, Ana Paula Antunes Ferreira, Lee Muddle, Gopi Anne McLeod, Kesava Kovanur Sampath, Niklas Sinderholm Sposato, Brett Vaughan
Background: Chronic pain management is challenging. Those with chronic pain present to health professionals, including osteopaths.
Methods: Secondary analysis of a cross-sectional survey of the Osteopathy Research Connect - New Zealand (ORC-NZ), a practice-based research network (PBRN). Demographic, practice, and treatment characteristics of osteopaths who 'often' and 'not often' treat chronic pain patients were collected.
Results: Two hundred and seventy-seven (277) NZ osteopaths responded and just over half (50.7% N = 138) reported 'often' treating chronic pain patients. This group, who have a similar male-to-female ratio, often use a diagnostic screening questionnaire (aOR 3.78), and often treat patients with non-musculoskeletal complaints (aOR 3.12) and tendinopathies (aOR 3.41).
Conclusions: This study highlights practice and clinical management characteristics of NZ osteopaths who manage chronic pain patients.
背景:慢性疼痛管理具有挑战性。那些慢性疼痛出现在卫生专业人员,包括整骨疗法。方法:对新西兰骨病研究联系(ORC-NZ),一个基于实践的研究网络(PBRN)的横断面调查进行二次分析。收集“经常”和“不经常”治疗慢性疼痛患者的整骨治疗师的人口统计学、实践和治疗特征。结果:277名新西兰整骨医生回应,超过一半(50.7% N = 138)报告“经常”治疗慢性疼痛患者。这一组的男女比例相似,经常使用诊断筛查问卷(aOR 3.78),并且经常治疗非肌肉骨骼疾病(aOR 3.12)和肌腱病变(aOR 3.41)的患者。结论:本研究突出了新西兰整骨医生治疗慢性疼痛患者的实践和临床管理特点。
{"title":"Characteristics of the practice of New Zealand osteopaths who manage patients with chronic pain.","authors":"Cindy McIntyre, Jerry Draper-Rodi, Ana Paula Antunes Ferreira, Lee Muddle, Gopi Anne McLeod, Kesava Kovanur Sampath, Niklas Sinderholm Sposato, Brett Vaughan","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2024.2436836","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2024.2436836","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic pain management is challenging. Those with chronic pain present to health professionals, including osteopaths.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Secondary analysis of a cross-sectional survey of the Osteopathy Research Connect - New Zealand (ORC-NZ), a practice-based research network (PBRN). Demographic, practice, and treatment characteristics of osteopaths who 'often' and 'not often' treat chronic pain patients were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and seventy-seven (277) NZ osteopaths responded and just over half (50.7% <i>N</i> = 138) reported 'often' treating chronic pain patients. This group, who have a similar male-to-female ratio, often use a diagnostic screening questionnaire (aOR 3.78), and often treat patients with non-musculoskeletal complaints (aOR 3.12) and tendinopathies (aOR 3.41).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights practice and clinical management characteristics of NZ osteopaths who manage chronic pain patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"625-632"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142789632","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-12-20DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2024.2441650
Hanna Brancaccio, Brandon Goodwin, John DesRochers, Alec Birnbaum, Uzay Cagatay, Bianna Koutsenko, Connor Flatley, Gilbert Siu
Aims: Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a painful sensation occurring in patients around the site of an amputation. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the efficacy of cryoneurolysis in the management of phantom limb pain.
Materials and methods: A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. An initial search yielded 200 articles from four major scientific databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, WebOfScience). Five articles met inclusion criteria, four of which underwent additional pooled statistical analysis.
Results: Pooled analysis of the included trials revealed a cumulative Cohen's d effect size of 1.55 (95% CI [0.24, 2.87]; p = 0.02; z = 2.32) for the reduction of pain on a 10-point pain scale following cryoneurolysis intervention. The remaining article that did not meet inclusion criteria for statistical analysis was a case report that reported a reduction in pain from 9/10 to 1/10 one week following intervention.
Conclusions: The large effect size demonstrated a statistically and clinically significant improvement in patient-reported pain. Additionally, patients may be able to reduce their amount of pharmaceutical pain management with successful cryoneurolysis treatment. However, these findings are limited by the small sample size and high heterogeneity between studies. Further high-quality studies should be performed to corroborate these findings.
Protocol registration: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD42024543085.
{"title":"Cryoneurolysis for phantom limb pain: a systematic review.","authors":"Hanna Brancaccio, Brandon Goodwin, John DesRochers, Alec Birnbaum, Uzay Cagatay, Bianna Koutsenko, Connor Flatley, Gilbert Siu","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2024.2441650","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2024.2441650","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a painful sensation occurring in patients around the site of an amputation. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the efficacy of cryoneurolysis in the management of phantom limb pain.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. An initial search yielded 200 articles from four major scientific databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, WebOfScience). Five articles met inclusion criteria, four of which underwent additional pooled statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pooled analysis of the included trials revealed a cumulative Cohen's d effect size of 1.55 (95% CI [0.24, 2.87]; <i>p</i> = 0.02; z = 2.32) for the reduction of pain on a 10-point pain scale following cryoneurolysis intervention. The remaining article that did not meet inclusion criteria for statistical analysis was a case report that reported a reduction in pain from 9/10 to 1/10 one week following intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The large effect size demonstrated a statistically and clinically significant improvement in patient-reported pain. Additionally, patients may be able to reduce their amount of pharmaceutical pain management with successful cryoneurolysis treatment. However, these findings are limited by the small sample size and high heterogeneity between studies. Further high-quality studies should be performed to corroborate these findings.</p><p><strong>Protocol registration: </strong>www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD42024543085.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"673-680"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142872785","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}