Pediatrics最新文献

Context: Exposure to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) is associated with adverse impacts on subsequent generations. The extent to which caregiver ACEs are associated with their child's ACE score is unclear.

Objective: To meta-analytically examine the association between caregiver and child ACE score. Potential moderators of this association were explored.

Data sources: Systematic searches were conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINHAL from 1998, the year the ACEs questionnaire was published, to February 19, 2024.

Study selection: Inclusion criteria were that the ACEs questionnaire was completed for both caregiver and child, an effect size was available, and the study was published in English.

Data extraction: Variables extracted included sample size and magnitude of association between caregiver ACEs and child ACEs, mean caregiver and child age, sex (% female), race and ethnicity, and informant of ACEs.

Results: Seventeen samples (4872 caregiver-child dyads) met inclusion criterion. Results revealed a large pooled-effect size between caregiver and child ACEs (r = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.25-0.41; P < .001), such that higher caregiver ACEs score was associated with higher child ACEs score. This association was stronger among studies with younger caregivers and studies that utilized caregiver-report compared with child self-report of ACEs.

Limitations: Many studies were conducted in North America with female caregiver samples, limiting generalizability beyond these populations.

Conclusions: Caregiver ACEs were strongly associated with child ACEs. Prevention and intervention efforts for caregivers should be trauma informed and focused on bolstering protective factors that may break cycles of intergenerational risk.

Objectives: To compare incidence of late-onset sepsis (LOS) among extremely preterm infants before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: Multicenter cohort study of infants with birthweight 401 to 1000 g or gestational age 22 to 28 weeks. LOS was defined as a bacterial or fungal pathogen isolated from blood or cerebrospinal fluid culture obtained after 72 hours of age. Primary outcome was LOS incidence calculated as incidence proportion (LOS cases among all admissions) and incidence rate (LOS events/1000 patient days). A multivariable Poisson regression model was used to compare the adjusted risk of LOS incidence proportion before (1/1/18-3/31/20) and during the pandemic (4/1/20-12/31/21). An interrupted time series analysis using a generalized linear mixed model with center as a random effect was used to compare LOS incidence rates during the 2 periods.

Results: Among 6509 eligible infants, LOS incidence proportion was not different before (18.2%) and during the pandemic (16.9%; P = .18). The adjusted relative risk (95% CI) for LOS was 0.93 (0.82-1.05) and for LOS or mortality was 0.98 (0.88-1.08) during the pandemic compared to the period before the pandemic. In the interrupted time series analysis, there was no significant change in LOS incidence rates at the start of the pandemic (0.219, 95% CI, -0.453 to 0.891) or microbiology of LOS, and change in trends of LOS incidence rates before and during the pandemic was not significant (-0.005, 95% CI, -0.025 to 0.015).

Conclusions: In a large multicenter study of extremely preterm infants, rates of LOS remained unchanged during the pandemic.

Background and objectives: Learning difficulties are frequently reported in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), yet little is known about the extent and predictors of their academic functions across ages. We aimed to examine the developmental patterns of academic achievement in these children from childhood to adolescence and how these patterns differ across demographic and NF1-related disease factors.

Methods: This cross-sectional study integrated data of 1512 children with NF1 (mean age, 11.2 years, SD, 3.62, range, 3-18, 46.5% female patients) from 8 institutions. Academic functioning was assessed with Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Achievement or the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test. Data were analyzed primarily using time-varying effect modeling.

Results: Participants' academic achievement was significantly lower than the normative means across ages, and the gap widened from middle childhood to midadolescence. Academic age trends varied across academic domains and demographic and disease factors. Male patients demonstrated larger deviations in math at midchildhood and in reading and writing between midchildhood and midadolescence. Children with lower parental education demonstrated larger deviations in math, reading, and writing between midchildhood and midadolescence. Children with familial NF1 demonstrated larger deviations in math at midchildhood and mid-to-late-adolescence, and in reading and writing between midchildhood and midadolescence.

Conclusions: Academic difficulties in children with NF1 emerge early and worsen with age. The findings also highlight the variability within this population across demographic and disease factors. The age-specific estimates of academic functions can serve as the first NF1-specific academic norms, providing useful insights for future research and practice.

Pediatric home health care represents a vital system of care for children with disability and medical complexity, encompassing services provided by family caregivers and nonfamily home health care providers and the use of durable medical equipment and supplies. Home health care is medically necessary for the physiologic health of children with disability and medical complexity and for their participation and function within home, school, and community settings. While the study of pediatric home health care in the United States has increased in the last decade, its research remains primarily methodologically limited to observational studies. Dedicated funding and research efforts are needed to transform American home health care research to address multifaceted outcomes valued by families and providers as well as payers and government programs. In this paper, we review the recent literature in pediatric home health care and then propose an actional agenda that could address its missing evidence base. We posit that pediatricians should partner with family caregiving experts and patients to advance knowledge about child and family health outcomes, home health care use, new models of care, and optimal approaches to education and training while also considering meaningful approaches to address disparities. The creation of an American pediatric home health care data-sharing consortium, patient registry, and reproducible access and quality measures is also needed. Most importantly, efforts should center on patient- and family-centered health priorities, with the goal of ensuring equitable outcomes for every child and family.

Context: Functional abdominal pain disorders (FAPDs) are debilitating disorders with unknown current prevalence.

Objective: To estimate global prevalence rates of FAPDs, their entities, and variations by diagnostic criteria, geography, gender, and age.

Data sources: Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and Cochrane Library were searched through October 14, 2024.

Study selection: Epidemiological studies of birth cohorts, school based, and from general population samples reporting FAPD prevalence in children (aged 4-18 years) using the Rome criteria.

Data extraction: Two researchers independently performed screening, data extraction, and quality assessment.

Results: A total of 66 studies, encompassing 201 134 participants from 29 countries, were included. The estimated global pooled prevalence of FAPDs was 11.7% (95% CI, 10.5%-13.1%). The most prevalent type was irritable bowel syndrome (5.8%; 95% CI, 4.5-7.4%), while functional abdominal pain-not otherwise specified was least prevalent (1.2%; 95% CI, 0.7%-2.1%)). Prevalence was highest using Rome III (13.2%; 95% CI, 11.3%-15.3%) and lowest under Rome IV criteria (9.0%; 95% CI, 6.7%-12.0%; P = .05). Girls had higher prevalence (14.4%; 95% CI, 12.5%-16.6%) than boys (9.4%; 95% CI, 7.8%-11.4%; P < .01). FAPDs were nonsignificantly more prevalent in Asia (13.0%; 95% CI, 10.4%-16.3%) compared to Europe (8.3%; 95% CI, 6.4%-10.7%) and North America (7.7%; 95% CI, 4.3-13.6; P = .09). No differences by age (P = .14) were recorded. Contributing factors include anxiety, depression, stress, negative life events, and poor sleep.

Limitations: Language restrictions, significant interstudy heterogeneity, and underrepresentation from Africa.

Conclusions and relevance: FAPDs affect over 1 in 9 children worldwide, with higher prevalence in girls and those with psychological stressors.