Plastic surgery最新文献

Objectives: We aimed to compare clinical and functional results of treatment of scaphoid pseudoarthrosis between patients undergoing wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) versus axillary block anesthesia. Methods: The patients diagnosed with scaphoid non-union who underwent pseudoarthoris surgery were divided into WALANT group (n  =  12) and axial block group (n  =  11). Visual analog scores (VAS) were measured by calling the patients via phone on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7. The VASs were also measured on the 14^th day during patient check-ups. At the end of 12 months, Michigan Hand Questionnaire was used to assess clinical recovery. Bone union rate and surgery time were also investigated. Radiological and clinical examinations were compared between the groups. Results: Eleven patients (91.7%) in the WALANT group and 10 patients (90.9%) in the axillary block group achieved bone union (P  =  .94). Although there was no significant difference in preoperative VAS score between the groups, the WALANT group had significantly lower VAS score of the first 3 days postoperatively. However, there was no significant difference in VAS score between the groups on the seventh and 14^th day postoperatively. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding Michigan score, time to surgery, time to union and operation time. Conclusion: The scaphoid pseudoarthrosis surgery can be done safely with WALANT technique which has significant lower VAS score on the first 3 days postoperatively.

Introduction: Regional anaesthesia (RA) techniques have increased in popularity due to evidence of reductions in acute pain, chronic pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and pulmonary complications. While upper extremity blocks (UEBs) have been the subject of several comprehensive reviews, no review to date has synthesised the information on their use in hand surgery. Methods: A search of PUBMED and Cochrane databases was performed to identify the evidence associated with upper extremity blocks. The results of this search and extant literature on UEBs were examined and the relevant information extracted. Results: Supraclavicular block is associated with transient complications such as Horner's syndrome and phrenic nerve palsy, affecting up to 54% and 50% of patients, respectively. The incidence of pneumothorax in supraclavicular blocks is up to 4%. Infraclavicular, interscalene and axillary blocks have a lower rate of all complications, however, each may require a supplementary block at a different anatomical site as each spares significant regions of the upper extremity. Epinephrine in concentrations of 1:100,000-200,000 is safe for use in digital blocks with no association digital gangrene. Current evidence suggests digital blocks are safe and efficacious when appropriately performed. Conclusion: UEBs are safe and may be administered by an anaesthesia provider or an appropriately trained surgeon. The choice of block is contingent on the anatomical location of the surgical procedure, procedure duration, patient preference, patient co-morbidieis, and the surgeon's experience. Most upper extremity surgeries can be performed using RA. Current evidence illustrates outcome benefits for patients, surgeons, and healthcare institutions utilising RA.

Purpose: Professional achievement awards are an important factor in recruitment, promotion, and faculty review within academic institutions. Studies have shown that subconscious, gender-based assumptions of individuals and their work in traditionally male-dominated fields lead to more positive evaluations of men than women, a phenomenon present among scientific and medical award committees. This study examined gender representation among recipients of major North American plastic surgery society awards over the last 50 years. Methods: Recipient lists of major achievement awards bestowed by ten American and Canadian plastic surgery societies between 1970 and 2020 were accessed online or by direct contact with the society. Awardee gender, institution affiliation, graduation year, fellowship status, and additional major awards received were recorded. Comparisons were made between gender representation among society presidents, board membership, general society memberships, attending physicians, and plastic surgery residency enrolment. Results: Thirty-two major awards given by ten plastic surgery societies were included. Six hundred and twenty-five awards were conferred, of which 47 recipients were female (7.5%). Of the 121 individuals that received multiple major awards, 8 were female. Two-thirds of female awardees (72%) were clinical plastic surgeons and the remainder were scientists. Over the past 50 years, there has been a gradual increase in the proportion of female award winners. Conclusions: Despite a gradual increase in the proportion of female awardees in major plastic surgery societies, female plastic surgeons remain underrepresented among awardees, with less than 10% of major awards conferred to females.

Background: The nose is the most critical aesthetic element of the face and even the smallest loss of substance can create a deformity of concern. The forehead flap has been the workhorse for nasal reconstruction for centuries but requires multiple surgical steps and leads to prominent donor-site scarring. The nasolabial flap allows a single-step reconstruction with a donor-site scar concealed in the nasolabial crease but is conventionally designated for small defects involving the ala. Methods: The authors analysed all surgical records of patients undergone nasal reconstruction by nasolabial flap between May 2005 and December 2021 by the Plastic Surgery Unit of a major regional hospital in Lombardy. Defects were classified according to Burget's subunit principle and the 3-component approach. Reconstruction features and finesses were reported and analysed. Results: In the 16-year period under analysis, 378 patients with nasal defects of various aetiologies received nose reconstruction by nasolabial flap. All nasal subunits were involved; 20 patients had multisubunit defects. In all the cases the reconstruction with nasolabial flap, alone or combined with other solutions, was intended to be one-stage. Conclusions: The authors present several tips and tricks about preoperative planning and design, choice of the pedicle, flap harvesting and sculpting with preservation/restoration of grooves and convexities, conjoining multiple flaps, downsizing extensive defects by a rhinoplasty-like framework reduction. With a careful planning and refined technique, the range of application of the nasolabial flap can include defects involving any nasal subunit and larger and/or multisubunit defects.

Purpose: This qualitative study explored First Nations (FN) women's perceptions about breast reconstruction (BR) after breast cancer surgery. Method: Participants were recruited through purposive and snowball sampling via Aboriginal health and community organizations, breast and plastic surgeons, an Aboriginal health liaison and an FN elder. Semistructured one-on-one interviews and an FN sharing circle were conducted, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic content analysis. Results: Nine women participated in the interviews. Three (33%) had been offered and had pursued BR, while 6 (67%) were either not offered or had not pursued breast reconstruction. Two of these 6 stated that they were not interested in BR. Four women participated in the sharing circle; 2 had been interviewed prior and 2 were new participants who shared similar themes and experiences to other participants also interviewed. Four key themes were identified: identity, information gaps, financial and transportation barriers, and consequences of colonization. Reasons cited to pursue BR were consistent with non-FN women such as improving self-image, concepts of femininity, and sense of normalcy. All participants reported that accessible, appropriate, and timely and culturally sensitive BR information was lacking. Living on reserve and the attendant expenses related to attending medical appointments was another barrier experienced by women in our study. The devastating impacts of colonization also deeply impacted several women in our study. Conclusion: When offered, FN women were receptive to pursuing BR. FN women have a particular set of obstacles related to consequences of colonization. Culturally sensitive and relevant oral communications grounded in first-hand experiences are desired. The 4 themes identified did influence the rate of BR uptake in the FN women who participated in our study and provided significant and unique obstacles to FN women.

Introduction: Many of the guidelines that are generally accepted as main operating room best practices are not evidence based. They are based on the concept that if some sterility is good, more must be better. They are not derived from evidence-based sterility. Evidence-based sterility is the study of which of our various sterility practices increase or decrease our infection rates, as opposed to guidelines based on how many bacteria are in the operating room. Methods: This article adds the most important evidence we could find that is not included in the first paper on evidence-based sterility in hand surgery published in 2019. In this review, we also balance the evidence with common sense opinion. Results: The 21st century has seen a rapid rise in the number and reports of hand surgery procedures performed with field sterility outside the main operating room. There is now an abundance of good evidence to support that the rate of infection is not higher when many hand operations are performed with field sterility in minor procedure rooms. Conclusion: Moving hand surgery out of the main operating room to minor procedure rooms should be supported by healthcare providers. The higher cost, increased solid waste, and inconvenience of main operating room surgery are not justifiable for many procedures because it does not reduce the risk of postoperative infection.

Introduction: Progressive hemifacial atrophy (PHA) and linear scleroderma (LS) are both rare conditions and defined by atrophy and/or sclerosis of the skin and subcutaneous tissue. The ideal timing of reconstructive intervention in these patients is controversial. We compared the outcome and satisfaction of autologous lipofilling performed during active and stable phases of the diseases in adults. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted with all patients diagnosed with PHA or LS between 2007 and 2019 in our department. We analysed demographic data, clinical features, and surgical procedures. The changes in symmetry, volume and skin texture were rated by surgeons at 1 week, 3 months and 6 months compared to the preoperative presentation. We compared the outcomes of patients treated during the active and the stable phase of the disease. Additionally, patients were asked to fill out a quality-of-life questionnaire. Results: We found a total of 11 patients diagnosed with PHA and LS, 8 of whom had undergone autologous fat injections to correct facial asymmetry. Of those, 4 patients were treated in their active and 4 in their stable phase. We found similar treatment outcomes in both groups. The social component had the greatest negative effect on patient's quality of life. Conclusion: In this small cohort, autologous fat grafting during the active phase did not appear to be inferior to fat grafting during the stable phase. It could be a safe technique for correction of PHA and LS during the active phase of disease.

Background: Innovation in the clinical surgical space is often generated by the insight and ideas of practicing surgeons whose ideas solve direct and relevant clinical problems with both novel products and reimagined processes. Despite some successes in both product and process development, innovation in the practicing surgical space does not occur with the frequency one might expect and does not consistently result in adoption of profitable or health-improving new products or processes. One barrier to successful innovation is the misalignment of incentives for early-stage innovation in the clinical surgical enterprise. This project was undertaken to determine best innovation practices for clinical Divisions and Departments. Methods: Best practices for innovation in industry were determined by company-specific examples, as well as literature review in the business and medical literature. Concepts were then integrated to determine a viable model that aligns incentives to encourage early-stage innovation. Proposal: The centralized Moderated Innovation Database (MID) of early-stage exploratory ideas integrates best practices of innovation in a low-cost, sustainable model. The MID must be executed in 3 phases to ensure viability in implementation. This model is likely to encourage innovation by both improving stakeholder satisfaction with and engagement in the process, and by increasing capture of early-stage innovation. Conclusion: Infrastructure for early-stage ideas will help align incentives for early-stage innovation, and the MID is consistent with best practices for innovation.