Pub Date : 2025-09-29DOI: 10.1177/22925503251379889
Victor Gibrán Reyes-García, Giancarlo Talleri-Ornelas, Giancarlo Talleri-De Andrea, Jesús Fernando Gallardo-Garcia, Quitzia Libertad Torres-Salazar
Background: Postmastectomy pain syndrome (PMPS) is a chronic condition affecting up to 50% of mastectomy patients, characterized by persistent pain that significantly impairs quality of life. Lipofilling, the transplantation of autologous fat, has emerged as a potential treatment option, offering pain relief and functional improvements through its regenerative properties. This study evaluates the effectiveness of lipofilling in managing PMPS and its impact on patients' quality of life. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted on 26 women diagnosed with PMPS at a tertiary care hospital in Jalisco, Mexico. This study exclusively included patients who had undergone modified radical mastectomy (MRM) without any form of breast reconstruction, in order to isolate non-implant-related causes of PMPS. Pain intensity and quality of life were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and EQ-5D-3L questionnaire at baseline, two weeks, and two months post-treatment. The lipofilling procedure included fat harvesting, processing via centrifugation, and reinjection into the affected chest wall areas. Changes in outcomes were analyzed using paired t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: The median VAS score decreased significantly from baseline (6, IQR 5-7) to two months post-treatment (4, IQR 3-5, p < 0.05). Quality of life scores improved markedly in the domains of mobility and usual activities (p < 0.05). No significant adverse effects were observed. Conclusion: Lipofilling is an effective intervention for reducing PMPS and improving quality of life, offering a promising option for reconstructive postmastectomy care.
{"title":"Effectiveness of Lipofilling in Postmastectomy Pain Syndrome: A Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Victor Gibrán Reyes-García, Giancarlo Talleri-Ornelas, Giancarlo Talleri-De Andrea, Jesús Fernando Gallardo-Garcia, Quitzia Libertad Torres-Salazar","doi":"10.1177/22925503251379889","DOIUrl":"10.1177/22925503251379889","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Postmastectomy pain syndrome (PMPS) is a chronic condition affecting up to 50% of mastectomy patients, characterized by persistent pain that significantly impairs quality of life. Lipofilling, the transplantation of autologous fat, has emerged as a potential treatment option, offering pain relief and functional improvements through its regenerative properties. This study evaluates the effectiveness of lipofilling in managing PMPS and its impact on patients' quality of life. <b>Methods:</b> A prospective cohort study was conducted on 26 women diagnosed with PMPS at a tertiary care hospital in Jalisco, Mexico. This study exclusively included patients who had undergone modified radical mastectomy (MRM) without any form of breast reconstruction, in order to isolate non-implant-related causes of PMPS. Pain intensity and quality of life were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and EQ-5D-3L questionnaire at baseline, two weeks, and two months post-treatment. The lipofilling procedure included fat harvesting, processing via centrifugation, and reinjection into the affected chest wall areas. Changes in outcomes were analyzed using paired t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, with significance set at p < 0.05. <b>Results:</b> The median VAS score decreased significantly from baseline (6, IQR 5-7) to two months post-treatment (4, IQR 3-5, p < 0.05). Quality of life scores improved markedly in the domains of mobility and usual activities (p < 0.05). No significant adverse effects were observed. <b>Conclusion:</b> Lipofilling is an effective intervention for reducing PMPS and improving quality of life, offering a promising option for reconstructive postmastectomy care.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"22925503251379889"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12479460/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145207376","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-29DOI: 10.1177/22925503251379895
Chloe R Wong, Jacob Wise, Syena Moltaji, Heather L Baltzer, Jeffrey Fialkov
Introduction: This study assesses how Canadian Plastic Surgery Residency Instagram accounts are utilized and perceived by residents, fellows, and attending physicians, and evaluates their influence on medical students' residency program selection. Methods: This 2-part study includes: (1) a descriptive analysis of Instagram activity, content, and engagement, along with a national survey of Canadian plastic surgery residents, fellows, and attendings assessing account utility; and (2) a survey of medical students who attended the University of Toronto Plastic Surgery Residency Information Session, evaluating Instagram's influence on residency selection. Descriptive statistics were reported. Results: Twelve of 13 Canadian Plastic Surgery Residency Programs had active Instagram accounts. Canadian Plastic Surgery Residency Instagram accounts had an average of 119 posts (SD = 94) over 5 years (SD = 2). Among surveyed residents (N = 27/77, 35%) and fellows/attendings (N = 83/328, 25%), Instagram use was reported by 93% and 81%, respectively. Resident recruitment ranked as the top goal (residents 1.75, fellows/attendings 3.17), followed by achievement highlights. Most residents (80%) and fellows/attendings (53%) felt medical students benefitted most. Preferred content included program culture (85%, 84%), resident profiles (90%, 73%), and research highlights (70%, 70%). Among medical student respondents (N = 25/112, 22%), 95% followed Canadian programs on Instagram, seeking program culture, resident profiles, and educational opportunities (all 89%). Over half (56%) said Instagram influenced their perception of a program, with all reporting a positive impact. Conclusion: Instagram is a valuable platform for Canadian Plastic Surgery Residency Programs to share insights and influence medical student decision-making.
{"title":"Evaluating the Utility and Impact of Canadian Plastic Surgery Residency Programs' Instagram Accounts on Resident Recruitment and Engagement.","authors":"Chloe R Wong, Jacob Wise, Syena Moltaji, Heather L Baltzer, Jeffrey Fialkov","doi":"10.1177/22925503251379895","DOIUrl":"10.1177/22925503251379895","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> This study assesses how Canadian Plastic Surgery Residency Instagram accounts are utilized and perceived by residents, fellows, and attending physicians, and evaluates their influence on medical students' residency program selection. <b>Methods:</b> This 2-part study includes: (1) a descriptive analysis of Instagram activity, content, and engagement, along with a national survey of Canadian plastic surgery residents, fellows, and attendings assessing account utility; and (2) a survey of medical students who attended the University of Toronto Plastic Surgery Residency Information Session, evaluating Instagram's influence on residency selection. Descriptive statistics were reported. <b>Results:</b> Twelve of 13 Canadian Plastic Surgery Residency Programs had active Instagram accounts. Canadian Plastic Surgery Residency Instagram accounts had an average of 119 posts (SD = 94) over 5 years (SD = 2). Among surveyed residents (<i>N</i> = 27/77, 35%) and fellows/attendings (<i>N</i> = 83/328, 25%), Instagram use was reported by 93% and 81%, respectively. Resident recruitment ranked as the top goal (residents 1.75, fellows/attendings 3.17), followed by achievement highlights. Most residents (80%) and fellows/attendings (53%) felt medical students benefitted most. Preferred content included program culture (85%, 84%), resident profiles (90%, 73%), and research highlights (70%, 70%). Among medical student respondents (<i>N</i> = 25/112, 22%), 95% followed Canadian programs on Instagram, seeking program culture, resident profiles, and educational opportunities (all 89%). Over half (56%) said Instagram influenced their perception of a program, with all reporting a positive impact. <b>Conclusion:</b> Instagram is a valuable platform for Canadian Plastic Surgery Residency Programs to share insights and influence medical student decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"22925503251379895"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12479458/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145207354","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-25DOI: 10.1177/22925503251379893
Max J Abercrombie, Kenneth Liu, Majid Alimohammadi
Introduction: Despite carpal tunnel release (CTR) being a common procedure in hand surgery, variation in the location of the nerves supplying the palm leads to a high risk of iatrogenic damage. Recommendations have been made for a surgical incision placement that would avoid such damage, yet injury persists in clinical practice. These studies infrequently consider the safety of multiple at-risk nerves when making their recommendation, often optimizing the safety of one and subsequently jeopardizing another's. Methods: Sixty-one dissections were performed on formalin preserved cadavers to define a safe zone in the palm and recommend an incision placement for CTR. Detailed measurements examining the anatomy of the palmar cutaneous branch of the median nerve (PCBMN), the palmar cutaneous branch of the ulnar nerve (PCBUN), and the thenar motor branch (TMB) were taken relative the scaphoid tubercle, pisiform, or the A line. Results: The PCBMN was located 3.3 ± 4.1 mm ulnar to the scaphoid tubercle and 8.7 ± 3.9 mm radial to the A line. The PCBUN was located the 6.5 ± 2.4 mm radial and 6.6 ± 3.7 mm ulnar from the pisiform and A line respectively. The TMB was found 8.0 ± 3.3 mm from the A line and was classified as 56% extraligamentous, 31% subligamentous, and 13% transligamentous. Conclusion: We conclude that an area approximately 6 mm ulnar and 7 mm radial from the A line is the safe zone for CTR and recommend an incision placement in line with the radial aspect of the fourth digit. This knowledge may aid surgeons performing CTR and help reduce iatrogenic damage.
{"title":"An Anatomical Study of At-Risk Nerves During Carpal Tunnel Release: Considerations for the Prevention of Iatrogenic Nerve Injury.","authors":"Max J Abercrombie, Kenneth Liu, Majid Alimohammadi","doi":"10.1177/22925503251379893","DOIUrl":"10.1177/22925503251379893","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Despite carpal tunnel release (CTR) being a common procedure in hand surgery, variation in the location of the nerves supplying the palm leads to a high risk of iatrogenic damage. Recommendations have been made for a surgical incision placement that would avoid such damage, yet injury persists in clinical practice. These studies infrequently consider the safety of multiple at-risk nerves when making their recommendation, often optimizing the safety of one and subsequently jeopardizing another's. <b>Methods:</b> Sixty-one dissections were performed on formalin preserved cadavers to define a safe zone in the palm and recommend an incision placement for CTR. Detailed measurements examining the anatomy of the palmar cutaneous branch of the median nerve (PCBMN), the palmar cutaneous branch of the ulnar nerve (PCBUN), and the thenar motor branch (TMB) were taken relative the scaphoid tubercle, pisiform, or the A line. <b>Results:</b> The PCBMN was located 3.3 ± 4.1 mm ulnar to the scaphoid tubercle and 8.7 ± 3.9 mm radial to the A line. The PCBUN was located the 6.5 ± 2.4 mm radial and 6.6 ± 3.7 mm ulnar from the pisiform and A line respectively. The TMB was found 8.0 ± 3.3 mm from the A line and was classified as 56% extraligamentous, 31% subligamentous, and 13% transligamentous. <b>Conclusion:</b> We conclude that an area approximately 6 mm ulnar and 7 mm radial from the A line is the safe zone for CTR and recommend an incision placement in line with the radial aspect of the fourth digit. This knowledge may aid surgeons performing CTR and help reduce iatrogenic damage.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"22925503251379893"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12463864/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145186624","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-16DOI: 10.1177/22925503251375862
Stahs Pripotnev, Noah S Llaneras, Bob Teixeira, Erica Lee, Megan Patterson, Michelle Seu, Susan E Mackinnon
Introduction:Seddon and Sunderland's original nerve injury classification systems have stood the test of time over the last 70 years and continue to be widely used today. However, since those original descriptions, knowledge of nerve pathophysiology and healing has advanced, electrodiagnostic results have become more refined, and surgical options have increased. Methods: We offer a revisited review of the nerve injury classification to incorporate new knowledge for the modern era of nerve surgery. Results: We offer the addition of grades 0 and VI to the existing classification of nerve injuries based on Sunderland's framework, and we present a simplified classification that is patient and physician oriented, reflecting prognosis, time to recovery, and degree of recovery. Discussion: By following this nerve injury framework, clinicians can better assess, prognosticate, and manage patients.
{"title":"The Classification of Nerve Injury Revisited: Sunderland 0-VI.","authors":"Stahs Pripotnev, Noah S Llaneras, Bob Teixeira, Erica Lee, Megan Patterson, Michelle Seu, Susan E Mackinnon","doi":"10.1177/22925503251375862","DOIUrl":"10.1177/22925503251375862","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>:Seddon and Sunderland's original nerve injury classification systems have stood the test of time over the last 70 years and continue to be widely used today. However, since those original descriptions, knowledge of nerve pathophysiology and healing has advanced, electrodiagnostic results have become more refined, and surgical options have increased. <b>Methods</b>: We offer a revisited review of the nerve injury classification to incorporate new knowledge for the modern era of nerve surgery. <b>Results</b>: We offer the addition of grades 0 and VI to the existing classification of nerve injuries based on Sunderland's framework, and we present a simplified classification that is patient and physician oriented, reflecting prognosis, time to recovery, and degree of recovery. <b>Discussion</b>: By following this nerve injury framework, clinicians can better assess, prognosticate, and manage patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"22925503251375862"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12550730/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145378424","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-08DOI: 10.1177/22925503251371052
Idorenyin E Ndem, Grace Anne Longfellow, Christina N Kapsalis, Meredith A Kugar, Marcos Lopez, Lauren Cook, Nina Mehta, Jennifer Carr
Background: Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is characterized by compression of neurovascular structures within the thoracic outlet. Symptoms include upper-extremity paresthesias, weakness, and, in some-cases, effort-induced thrombosis. Implant-based breast reconstruction has been identified as a potential etiology of TOS given the anatomic relationship of the pectoralis muscles to the thoracic outlet. This study aims to investigate the relationship between implant-based reconstruction and TOS diagnosis. Methods: A retrospective, single-institution review was conducted to identify female subjects that presented for evaluation of TOS-like symptoms between April 2014 and December 2022. Results: 319 female patients presented to our institution for evaluation. Sixteen (5.0%) of these subjects previously underwent implant-based breast reconstruction, for which the following outcomes were considered: symptom type, timing to onset of symptoms relative to timing of reconstruction, and diagnosis of TOS as confirmed by imaging or testing. Seven of 16 patients (43.8%) received a formal diagnosis of TOS from a surgical specialist and were also found to have subpectoral implants. Conclusions: Based on clinical evidence, breast reconstruction has been acknowledged as a probable etiology for TOS. However, over half of symptomatic subjects did not receive a formal diagnosis of TOS, suggesting a potential for improvement in screening methods for this population. While the data of this study suggests that the plane of reconstruction, specifically subpectoral, could have an association with TOS, further research with a larger patient cohort is necessary to establish a definitive causal relationship.
{"title":"Thoracic Outlet Syndrome After Implant-based Breast Reconstruction.","authors":"Idorenyin E Ndem, Grace Anne Longfellow, Christina N Kapsalis, Meredith A Kugar, Marcos Lopez, Lauren Cook, Nina Mehta, Jennifer Carr","doi":"10.1177/22925503251371052","DOIUrl":"10.1177/22925503251371052","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is characterized by compression of neurovascular structures within the thoracic outlet. Symptoms include upper-extremity paresthesias, weakness, and, in some-cases, effort-induced thrombosis. Implant-based breast reconstruction has been identified as a potential etiology of TOS given the anatomic relationship of the pectoralis muscles to the thoracic outlet. This study aims to investigate the relationship between implant-based reconstruction and TOS diagnosis. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective, single-institution review was conducted to identify female subjects that presented for evaluation of TOS-like symptoms between April 2014 and December 2022. <b>Results:</b> 319 female patients presented to our institution for evaluation. Sixteen (5.0%) of these subjects previously underwent implant-based breast reconstruction, for which the following outcomes were considered: symptom type, timing to onset of symptoms relative to timing of reconstruction, and diagnosis of TOS as confirmed by imaging or testing. Seven of 16 patients (43.8%) received a formal diagnosis of TOS from a surgical specialist and were also found to have subpectoral implants. <b>Conclusions:</b> Based on clinical evidence, breast reconstruction has been acknowledged as a probable etiology for TOS. However, over half of symptomatic subjects did not receive a formal diagnosis of TOS, suggesting a potential for improvement in screening methods for this population. While the data of this study suggests that the plane of reconstruction, specifically subpectoral, could have an association with TOS, further research with a larger patient cohort is necessary to establish a definitive causal relationship.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"22925503251371052"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417449/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145041108","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Emergency department (ED) visits following elective surgeries place significant strain on already overburdened healthcare systems. In Nova Scotia, carpal tunnel release (CTR) and trigger finger release (TFR) are the most common elective hand surgeries performed. This study sought to determine the rates, reasons, and risk factors associated with ED visits following elective outpatient hand surgery. Methods: Patients who underwent CTR or TFR between April 1, 2016 and March 31, 2022, and visited any Nova Scotia ED within 90 days of surgery were identified using provincial healthcare databases. A chart review was completed to explore ED timing, reasons for presentation, and predetermined systems-level factors. Results: During the retrospective period, 2690 patients underwent CTR and 1103 patients underwent TFR. For CTR, 159 patients (5.97%) presented to the ED within 90 days of surgery for surgery-specific concerns. The most common presentation was surgical site infection (2.16%), wound check (1.60%), and suture removal (1.04%). For TFR, 63 (5.71%) patients presented to the ED within 90 days. Similarly, surgical site infection was the most common presentation (2.63%) followed by suture removal (1.45%) and wound check (1.18%). The most frequent timing for ED presentation was days 13-15 (27.9%). Conclusion: In an evaluation of true healthcare utilization after elective surgery, ED visits for surgery-specific concerns after CTR and TFR were nearly 6%, far exceeding expected complication rates. As the presentations are manageable in an outpatient clinic or office setting, a mixed-methods patient-oriented intervention is planned to redirect this population away from the ED.
{"title":"Emergency Department Visits Within 90 Days of Elective Hand Surgery: A Healthcare Utilization Study.","authors":"Katie Ross, Haley Glazebrook, Jo-Anne Douglas, Justin MacLellan, Emily M Krauss","doi":"10.1177/22925503251371057","DOIUrl":"10.1177/22925503251371057","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Emergency department (ED) visits following elective surgeries place significant strain on already overburdened healthcare systems. In Nova Scotia, carpal tunnel release (CTR) and trigger finger release (TFR) are the most common elective hand surgeries performed. This study sought to determine the rates, reasons, and risk factors associated with ED visits following elective outpatient hand surgery. <b>Methods:</b> Patients who underwent CTR or TFR between April 1, 2016 and March 31, 2022, and visited any Nova Scotia ED within 90 days of surgery were identified using provincial healthcare databases. A chart review was completed to explore ED timing, reasons for presentation, and predetermined systems-level factors. <b>Results:</b> During the retrospective period, 2690 patients underwent CTR and 1103 patients underwent TFR. For CTR, 159 patients (5.97%) presented to the ED within 90 days of surgery for surgery-specific concerns. The most common presentation was surgical site infection (2.16%), wound check (1.60%), and suture removal (1.04%). For TFR, 63 (5.71%) patients presented to the ED within 90 days. Similarly, surgical site infection was the most common presentation (2.63%) followed by suture removal (1.45%) and wound check (1.18%). The most frequent timing for ED presentation was days 13-15 (27.9%). <b>Conclusion:</b> In an evaluation of true healthcare utilization after elective surgery, ED visits for surgery-specific concerns after CTR and TFR were nearly 6%, far exceeding expected complication rates. As the presentations are manageable in an outpatient clinic or office setting, a mixed-methods patient-oriented intervention is planned to redirect this population away from the ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"22925503251371057"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12408531/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145016029","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-29DOI: 10.1177/22925503251371048
Justin J Lee, Nikhil Patil, Trent Schimmel, Matthew D Benson, Joshua J DeSerres
Background: Surgical repair of orbital fractures comes with risks. One rare risk is interference with the actions of the superior oblique tendon-muscle complex causing an acquired Brown syndrome. We present the case of a 45-year-old man who developed acquired Brown syndrome after undergoing repair of a large orbital floor and medial orbital wall fracture using a titanium mesh implant. A case report was prepared to discuss a rare surgical risk with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of an orbital wall fracture. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed. Results: Post-operative ophthalmological assessment revealed persistent diplopia along with limitations of up-gaze particularly in the adducted position. Ultimately, the patient underwent surgical repositioning of the orbital implant, which seemingly released the superior oblique muscle-tendon complex, resolving most of the diplopia. No further treatment with prisms or strabismus surgery has been required. Conclusions: Acquired Brown syndrome is a potential risk of surgical repair of orbital fractures involving the medial orbital wall. Herein this case study, we describe a case of acquired Brown syndrome following ORIF of an orbital floor and medial wall fracture, which was alleviated with a revision surgery.
{"title":"Acquired Brown Syndrome as a Postoperative Complication of Orbital Wall Fracture Repair with Metallic Mesh.","authors":"Justin J Lee, Nikhil Patil, Trent Schimmel, Matthew D Benson, Joshua J DeSerres","doi":"10.1177/22925503251371048","DOIUrl":"10.1177/22925503251371048","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Surgical repair of orbital fractures comes with risks. One rare risk is interference with the actions of the superior oblique tendon-muscle complex causing an acquired Brown syndrome. We present the case of a 45-year-old man who developed acquired Brown syndrome after undergoing repair of a large orbital floor and medial orbital wall fracture using a titanium mesh implant. A case report was prepared to discuss a rare surgical risk with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of an orbital wall fracture. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective chart review was performed. <b>Results:</b> Post-operative ophthalmological assessment revealed persistent diplopia along with limitations of up-gaze particularly in the adducted position. Ultimately, the patient underwent surgical repositioning of the orbital implant, which seemingly released the superior oblique muscle-tendon complex, resolving most of the diplopia. No further treatment with prisms or strabismus surgery has been required. <b>Conclusions:</b> Acquired Brown syndrome is a potential risk of surgical repair of orbital fractures involving the medial orbital wall. Herein this case study, we describe a case of acquired Brown syndrome following ORIF of an orbital floor and medial wall fracture, which was alleviated with a revision surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"22925503251371048"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12397089/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144966082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-29DOI: 10.1177/22925503251371051
Norbert Banyi, Theresa Buchel, Young Ji Tuen, Sophia Shayan, Rebecca Courtemanche, Jugpal S Arneja
Introduction: The landscape of academic research has evolved notably in recent decades, shifting towards earlier career publications and more interdisciplinary collaborations. This study aims to identify research productivity trends among Canadian academic plastic surgeons. Methods: The Web of Science and MEDLINE databases were searched by plastic surgeon names and for each result, the author list position, year of publication, journal, and citation counts were collected. Surgeons' demographics, including gender and medical school graduation year, were obtained from provincial college websites. Publication rates over a plastic surgeon's career trajectory were analyzed by surgeons' current decade of practice. Results: There were 3661 included entries in our database, corresponding to 2831 unique publications by 245 surgeons (71%, 175/245 men). The median year of medical school graduation was 2002 (SD 12 years). Surgeons in more recent decades of practice (decade 1 or decade 2) published earlier and more frequently per career decade. A wide distribution of publication rates (range 0-66) was found for surgeons currently in their fourth decade of practice. From 2005 to 2020, the number of publications per year increased dramatically, from 36 publications in 2005 to 198 publications in 2020. Citations normalized by years from publication remained stable. The proportion of first authorship decreased from 0.63 and 0.42 in the pre-medicine and educational decades, to 0.09 and 0.08 by the third and fourth decades of practice (p < .001). Conclusion: An emerging trend of earlier and increased publications among newer generations of surgeons was seen. Incentives to participate and mentor in research for surgeons gaining seniority are suggested.
引言:近几十年来,学术研究的格局发生了显著的变化,转向早期的职业出版物和更多的跨学科合作。本研究旨在确定加拿大学术整形外科医生的研究生产力趋势。方法:通过Web of Science和MEDLINE数据库检索整形外科医生的姓名,并收集每个结果的作者名单位置、发表年份、期刊和被引次数。外科医生的人口统计数据,包括性别和医学院毕业年份,从省级高校网站获得。在整形外科医生的职业生涯轨迹中,发表率是根据外科医生目前十年的实践来分析的。结果:我们的数据库中有3661条纳入条目,对应245名外科医生的2831篇独特出版物(71%,175/245名男性)。医学院毕业年份中位数为2002年(标准差12年)。外科医生在近几十年的实践中(第1年或第2年)每十年发表的时间更早,频率更高。发表率分布广泛(范围0-66)的外科医生目前在他们的执业第四个十年。从2005年到2020年,每年的出版物数量急剧增加,从2005年的36篇增加到2020年的198篇。从出版开始按年份标准化的引文保持稳定。第一作者比例从医学预科和教育十年的0.63和0.42下降到第三和第四个十年的0.09和0.08 (p结论:在新一代外科医生中出现了早期和增加发表论文的趋势。建议为获得资历的外科医生提供参与和指导研究的激励措施。
{"title":"Publication Trajectories of Today's Canadian Academic Plastic Surgeons: A Bibliometric Analysis.","authors":"Norbert Banyi, Theresa Buchel, Young Ji Tuen, Sophia Shayan, Rebecca Courtemanche, Jugpal S Arneja","doi":"10.1177/22925503251371051","DOIUrl":"10.1177/22925503251371051","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> The landscape of academic research has evolved notably in recent decades, shifting towards earlier career publications and more interdisciplinary collaborations. This study aims to identify research productivity trends among Canadian academic plastic surgeons. <b>Methods:</b> The Web of Science and MEDLINE databases were searched by plastic surgeon names and for each result, the author list position, year of publication, journal, and citation counts were collected. Surgeons' demographics, including gender and medical school graduation year, were obtained from provincial college websites. Publication rates over a plastic surgeon's career trajectory were analyzed by surgeons' current decade of practice. <b>Results:</b> There were 3661 included entries in our database, corresponding to 2831 unique publications by 245 surgeons (71%, 175/245 men). The median year of medical school graduation was 2002 (SD 12 years). Surgeons in more recent decades of practice (decade 1 or decade 2) published earlier and more frequently per career decade. A wide distribution of publication rates (range 0-66) was found for surgeons currently in their fourth decade of practice. From 2005 to 2020, the number of publications per year increased dramatically, from 36 publications in 2005 to 198 publications in 2020. Citations normalized by years from publication remained stable. The proportion of first authorship decreased from 0.63 and 0.42 in the pre-medicine and educational decades, to 0.09 and 0.08 by the third and fourth decades of practice (p < .001). <b>Conclusion:</b> An emerging trend of earlier and increased publications among newer generations of surgeons was seen. Incentives to participate and mentor in research for surgeons gaining seniority are suggested.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"22925503251371051"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12397090/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144966005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-26DOI: 10.1177/22925503251363108
Melissa Chao, Kellan Woo, David Long, Dana Toameh, Kathryn V Isaac
Introduction: Despite rising rates of post-mastectomy immediate breast reconstruction (IBR), there are fears of local recurrence (LR) among patients and physicians. This systematic review and meta-analysis compare long-term LR incidence in patients with mastectomy and IBR (Mast + IBR) to patients with mastectomy alone (Mast - IBR). Methods: Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant articles. Articles published between January 2000 and December 2020 were included when LR rates were reported for patients with breast cancer (stage I or II) who underwent mastectomy with or without IBR. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI), adjusted for age, and follow-up time. Results: In total, 1475 unique articles were identified, with 1434 excluded in title abstract screening and 31 excluded in full-text screening. Ten articles, amounting to 15 173 patients (3478 Mast + IBR, 11 695 Mast - IBR), were included. In total, 111 (3.2%) patients in Mast + IBR experienced LR after a mean follow-up time of 72.9 months, while 245 (2.1%) in Mast - IBR experienced LR after a mean follow-up time of 73.3 months. There were no increased odds of LR in Mast + IBR, adjusted for age, and follow-up time (OR 1.17, CI 0.86-1.59, P = 0.59). Conclusion: This meta-analysis supports that IBR is not associated with increased LR odds compared to mastectomy alone. Patients with breast cancer may undergo mastectomy and IBR without concern of increased rates of LR, which contributes to improved quality of life.
导语:尽管乳房切除术后立即乳房重建(IBR)的比例不断上升,但患者和医生仍然担心局部复发(LR)。本系统综述和荟萃分析比较了乳房切除术和IBR患者(Mast + IBR)和单独乳房切除术患者(Mast - IBR)的长期LR发病率。方法:检索Medline、Embase和Web of Science数据库的相关文章。2000年1月至2020年12月期间发表的文章被纳入了有或没有IBR的乳房切除术的乳腺癌(I期或II期)患者的LR率报告。使用随机效应模型计算合并优势比(or), 95%置信区间(CI),调整年龄和随访时间。结果:共鉴定出1475篇独特的文章,其中1434篇被排除在标题摘要筛选之外,31篇被排除在全文筛选之外。纳入10篇文章,共15173例患者(3478例Mast + IBR, 11695例Mast - IBR)。总体而言,111例(3.2%)Mast + IBR患者在平均随访时间为72.9个月后出现LR,而245例(2.1%)Mast - IBR患者在平均随访时间为73.3个月后出现LR。经年龄和随访时间调整后,Mast + IBR患者发生LR的几率没有增加(OR 1.17, CI 0.86-1.59, P = 0.59)。结论:这一荟萃分析支持IBR与单纯乳房切除术相比与LR风险增加无关。乳腺癌患者可以接受乳房切除术和IBR,而不必担心LR的发生率增加,这有助于提高生活质量。
{"title":"Breast Cancer Local Recurrence in Patients With and Without Post-Mastectomy Immediate Breast Reconstruction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Melissa Chao, Kellan Woo, David Long, Dana Toameh, Kathryn V Isaac","doi":"10.1177/22925503251363108","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503251363108","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Despite rising rates of post-mastectomy immediate breast reconstruction (IBR), there are fears of local recurrence (LR) among patients and physicians. This systematic review and meta-analysis compare long-term LR incidence in patients with mastectomy and IBR (Mast + IBR) to patients with mastectomy alone (Mast - IBR). <b>Methods:</b> Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant articles. Articles published between January 2000 and December 2020 were included when LR rates were reported for patients with breast cancer (stage I or II) who underwent mastectomy with or without IBR. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI), adjusted for age, and follow-up time. <b>Results:</b> In total, 1475 unique articles were identified, with 1434 excluded in title abstract screening and 31 excluded in full-text screening. Ten articles, amounting to 15 173 patients (3478 Mast + IBR, 11 695 Mast - IBR), were included. In total, 111 (3.2%) patients in Mast + IBR experienced LR after a mean follow-up time of 72.9 months, while 245 (2.1%) in Mast - IBR experienced LR after a mean follow-up time of 73.3 months. There were no increased odds of LR in Mast + IBR, adjusted for age, and follow-up time (OR 1.17, CI 0.86-1.59, <i>P</i> = 0.59). <b>Conclusion:</b> This meta-analysis supports that IBR is not associated with increased LR odds compared to mastectomy alone. Patients with breast cancer may undergo mastectomy and IBR without concern of increased rates of LR, which contributes to improved quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"22925503251363108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12380726/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144965014","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}