Pub Date : 2025-10-09DOI: 10.1177/22925503251381628
Barite Gutama, Yomna E Dean, Virginia Bailey, Puja Jagasia, Elianna Dash, James L Rogers, Andrew J James, Benjamin L Savitz, Ronald M Cornely, Noah Alter, Erin N Abbott, Ricardo A Torres-Guzman, William Lineaweaver
Introduction: Reduction mammoplasty alleviates physical and psychological discomfort in patients with large breasts. The present study sought to determine preoperative markers that may herald postoperative complications. Methods: The NSQIP 2021 data file was queried using CPT and ICD-10 diagnosis codes to identify patients who underwent reduction mammoplasty at participating hospitals. To reduce confounders, patients undergoing gender affirming surgeries and males were excluded from the analysis. Preoperative comorbidities and laboratory values were analyzed using univariate and multivariate regression to determine their association with overall 30-day postoperative complications. Results: In total, 5909 reduction mammoplasty patients were identified. Patients aged ≥ 65 years had 1.47 times higher odds of developing complications after breast reduction compared to those who were younger in age (95% CI 1.02 - 2.07, P < 0.05). Tobacco use had 1.65 times higher chance of developing complications after their surgery compared to no tobacco use (95% CI 1.11-2.38, P < 0.05) and similarly, patients with ASA class III-V had 1.6 times higher odds of complications after their surgery compared to ASA class I-II (1.25-2.03, P < 0.05). Conclusion: Patients aged ≥ 65 years, those who smoke tobacco, have obesity (BMI ≥ 30), and/or are classified as ASA III-V are significantly associated with increased 30-day complication rates following reduction mammoplasty. Preoperative counseling of these patients should emphasize the importance of modifying risk factors-such as smoking cessation and weight reduction-and clearly communicate their high risk of postoperative complications to support informed decision-making and foster realistic patients expectations.
简介:缩小乳房成形术减轻了大乳房患者的生理和心理不适。本研究旨在确定可能预示术后并发症的术前标记。方法:使用CPT和ICD-10诊断代码查询NSQIP 2021数据文件,识别参与医院行缩乳术的患者。为了减少混杂因素,进行性别确认手术的患者和男性被排除在分析之外。使用单因素和多因素回归分析术前合并症和实验室值,以确定其与术后30天总并发症的关系。结果:共发现5909例缩乳患者。年龄≥65岁的患者缩乳术后并发症发生率是年龄较年轻患者的1.47倍(95% CI 1.02 - 2.07, P)。结论:年龄≥65岁、吸烟、肥胖(BMI≥30)和/或ASA III-V级患者与缩乳术后30天并发症发生率增加显著相关。这些患者的术前咨询应强调改变危险因素(如戒烟和减肥)的重要性,并清楚地告知他们术后并发症的高风险,以支持知情决策并培养切合实际的患者期望。
{"title":"Factors Associated With Complications After Reduction Mammoplasty: Analysis of 5909 Patients Using a National Database: Facteurs associés aux complications après mammoplastie de réduction : analyse de 5909 cas de patientes à partir d'une base de données nationale.","authors":"Barite Gutama, Yomna E Dean, Virginia Bailey, Puja Jagasia, Elianna Dash, James L Rogers, Andrew J James, Benjamin L Savitz, Ronald M Cornely, Noah Alter, Erin N Abbott, Ricardo A Torres-Guzman, William Lineaweaver","doi":"10.1177/22925503251381628","DOIUrl":"10.1177/22925503251381628","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Reduction mammoplasty alleviates physical and psychological discomfort in patients with large breasts. The present study sought to determine preoperative markers that may herald postoperative complications. <b>Methods:</b> The NSQIP 2021 data file was queried using CPT and ICD-10 diagnosis codes to identify patients who underwent reduction mammoplasty at participating hospitals. To reduce confounders, patients undergoing gender affirming surgeries and males were excluded from the analysis. Preoperative comorbidities and laboratory values were analyzed using univariate and multivariate regression to determine their association with overall 30-day postoperative complications. <b>Results:</b> In total, 5909 reduction mammoplasty patients were identified. Patients aged ≥ 65 years had 1.47 times higher odds of developing complications after breast reduction compared to those who were younger in age (95% CI 1.02 - 2.07, P < 0.05). Tobacco use had 1.65 times higher chance of developing complications after their surgery compared to no tobacco use (95% CI 1.11-2.38, P < 0.05) and similarly, patients with ASA class III-V had 1.6 times higher odds of complications after their surgery compared to ASA class I-II (1.25-2.03, P < 0.05). <b>Conclusion:</b> Patients aged ≥ 65 years, those who smoke tobacco, have obesity (BMI ≥ 30), and/or are classified as ASA III-V are significantly associated with increased 30-day complication rates following reduction mammoplasty. Preoperative counseling of these patients should emphasize the importance of modifying risk factors-such as smoking cessation and weight reduction-and clearly communicate their high risk of postoperative complications to support informed decision-making and foster realistic patients expectations.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"22925503251381628"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12530473/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145329811","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01DOI: 10.1177/22925503251379892
Muhammadhasan Nasser, Kaitlyn Soro, Natasha Barone, Kevin J Zuo
Introduction: Stenosing tenosynovitis (trigger finger) is a common condition caused by inflammation and hypertrophy of flexor tendons. Corticosteroid injection (CSI) is an effective and safe treatment option. A palmar approach for CSI is typically used; however dorsal injection, which may be less painful, is not well-studied. Methods: A 6-stage scoping review was conducted to characterize outcomes associated with dorsal CSI for trigger finger management. We searched Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science for eligible articles in English from inception to July 2024. Data regarding study characteristics and CSI outcomes were synthesized. Risk of bias was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools. Results: Four articles were included in the review, comprising 1 case series, 2 cohort studies, and 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT). Symptom resolution rates following dorsal CSI ranged from 54% to 73.5%, comparable to a palmar approach. Two studies compared dorsal and palmar injections and found no significant differences in effectiveness. Pain scores for dorsal injections were similar or significantly lower than those for palmar injections in 2 studies. No adverse effects or complications were reported with either injection technique. Conclusion: Current evidence suggests a dorsal approach for CSI in trigger finger management is noninferior to a palmar approach in terms of efficacy and safety, with potential benefits in reducing injection-associated pain. However, more high-quality studies, including RCTs, are needed. Future research should assess anesthetic distribution and patient-reported outcomes to better understand the clinical implications of a dorsal CSI approach.
简介:狭窄性腱鞘炎(扳机指)是由屈肌腱炎症和肥大引起的一种常见疾病。皮质类固醇注射(CSI)是一种有效和安全的治疗选择。CSI通常采用手掌法;然而,背侧注射可能较少疼痛,但尚未得到充分研究。方法:进行了一项6阶段的范围审查,以表征与扳机指管理的背侧CSI相关的结果。我们检索了Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE和Web of Science,检索了从创立到2024年7月的符合条件的英文文章。综合有关研究特征和CSI结果的数据。使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所关键评估工具评估偏倚风险。结果:纳入4篇文献,包括1个病例系列、2个队列研究和1个随机对照试验(RCT)。背侧CSI后症状缓解率为54%至73.5%,与掌侧入路相当。两项研究比较了背部注射和手掌注射,发现效果没有显著差异。2项研究中,背部注射的疼痛评分与掌部注射相似或显著低于掌部注射。两种注射方法均无不良反应或并发症报道。结论:目前的证据表明,在触发指的CSI治疗中,背侧入路的疗效和安全性不亚于掌侧入路,在减少注射相关疼痛方面具有潜在的优势。然而,需要更多高质量的研究,包括随机对照试验。未来的研究应评估麻醉分布和患者报告的结果,以更好地了解背侧CSI入路的临床意义。
{"title":"Dorsal Approach for Corticosteroid Injection in Trigger Finger Management: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Muhammadhasan Nasser, Kaitlyn Soro, Natasha Barone, Kevin J Zuo","doi":"10.1177/22925503251379892","DOIUrl":"10.1177/22925503251379892","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Stenosing tenosynovitis (trigger finger) is a common condition caused by inflammation and hypertrophy of flexor tendons. Corticosteroid injection (CSI) is an effective and safe treatment option. A palmar approach for CSI is typically used; however dorsal injection, which may be less painful, is not well-studied. <b>Methods:</b> A 6-stage scoping review was conducted to characterize outcomes associated with dorsal CSI for trigger finger management. We searched Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science for eligible articles in English from inception to July 2024. Data regarding study characteristics and CSI outcomes were synthesized. Risk of bias was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools. <b>Results:</b> Four articles were included in the review, comprising 1 case series, 2 cohort studies, and 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT). Symptom resolution rates following dorsal CSI ranged from 54% to 73.5%, comparable to a palmar approach. Two studies compared dorsal and palmar injections and found no significant differences in effectiveness. Pain scores for dorsal injections were similar or significantly lower than those for palmar injections in 2 studies. No adverse effects or complications were reported with either injection technique. <b>Conclusion:</b> Current evidence suggests a dorsal approach for CSI in trigger finger management is noninferior to a palmar approach in terms of efficacy and safety, with potential benefits in reducing injection-associated pain. However, more high-quality studies, including RCTs, are needed. Future research should assess anesthetic distribution and patient-reported outcomes to better understand the clinical implications of a dorsal CSI approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"22925503251379892"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488611/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145233158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-29DOI: 10.1177/22925503251379894
Nishant Kumar, Vasupriya Ravi, Lauren Gates-Tanzer, Michaelangelo Coppa, Jorys Martinez-Jorge, James T Paget, Aparna Vijayasekaran
Introduction: Capsular contracture (CC) is the most common complication following breast augmentation and reconstruction. Although numerous risk factors and preventive strategies have been proposed, the etiology remains poorly understood. This study employs bibliometric analysis to evaluate global research trends, collaboration networks, and emerging hotspots in CC research. Methods: We queried the Web of Science Core Collection using keywords related to breast implants and CC, including publications through December 31, 2024. Data including publication year, author, institution, citations(C), and keywords were analyzed using VOSviewer, Microsoft Excel, and Scimago Graphica to visualize trends, collaboration networks, and research foci. Results: A total of 2065 publications(P) were included. The United States led in both total publication output and citation count (P = 800, C = 27 984), with Harvard (P = 48, C = 1688) and Georgetown Universities (P = 45, C = 2750) being key contributors. Emerging contributions from Asian institutions were noted, though citation impact remained lower. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery was the most prolific and cited journal (P = 473, C = 23 113). Recent research hotspots identified through keyword analysis include Biofilm, Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM), Implant placement, contamination, and inflammation. Most top-cited studies were of Level IV or V evidence. Conclusion: Research on CC is increasing, with a shift toward exploring biological mechanisms like biofilm formation and preventative measures such as ADM and implant positioning. Despite growing international interest, most evidence remains low quality. Future work should prioritize clinical studies that generate higher level of evidence and foster broader global collaboration to improve patient outcomes and refine surgical practices.
简介:包膜挛缩(CC)是隆胸和乳房再造后最常见的并发症。虽然提出了许多危险因素和预防策略,但病因仍然知之甚少。本研究采用文献计量分析的方法,对全球CC研究趋势、合作网络和新兴热点进行了评价。方法:使用与乳房植入物和CC相关的关键词查询Web of Science Core Collection,包括截至2024年12月31日的出版物。使用VOSviewer、Microsoft Excel和Scimago Graphica分析包括出版年份、作者、机构、引文(C)和关键词在内的数据,以可视化趋势、协作网络和研究重点。结果:共纳入文献2065篇(P)。美国在总发表量和引用数方面都处于领先地位(P = 800, C = 27984),其中哈佛大学(P = 48, C = 1688)和乔治城大学(P = 45, C = 2750)是主要贡献者。亚洲机构的新兴贡献得到了注意,但引用影响仍然较低。《整形与重建外科》是最多产和被引用的期刊(P = 473, C = 23 113)。通过关键词分析确定的近期研究热点包括生物膜、脱细胞真皮基质(ADM)、植入物、污染和炎症。大多数被引用最多的研究都是IV级或V级证据。结论:对CC的研究越来越多,并转向探索生物膜形成等生物学机制以及ADM和植入物定位等预防措施。尽管国际上的兴趣越来越大,但大多数证据的质量仍然很低。未来的工作应优先考虑产生更高水平证据的临床研究,并促进更广泛的全球合作,以改善患者预后和改进手术实践。
{"title":"A Bibliometric Review of Capsular Contracture in Breast Implant: Global Trends and Research Hotspots.","authors":"Nishant Kumar, Vasupriya Ravi, Lauren Gates-Tanzer, Michaelangelo Coppa, Jorys Martinez-Jorge, James T Paget, Aparna Vijayasekaran","doi":"10.1177/22925503251379894","DOIUrl":"10.1177/22925503251379894","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Capsular contracture (CC) is the most common complication following breast augmentation and reconstruction. Although numerous risk factors and preventive strategies have been proposed, the etiology remains poorly understood. This study employs bibliometric analysis to evaluate global research trends, collaboration networks, and emerging hotspots in CC research. <b>Methods:</b> We queried the <i>Web of Science Core Collection</i> using keywords related to breast implants and CC, including publications through December 31, 2024. Data including publication year, author, institution, citations(C), and keywords were analyzed using <i>VOSviewer</i>, <i>Microsoft Excel</i>, and <i>Scimago Graphica</i> to visualize trends, collaboration networks, and research foci. <b>Results:</b> A total of 2065 publications(P) were included. The United States led in both total publication output and citation count (P = 800, C = 27 984), with <i>Harvard</i> (P = 48, C = 1688) and <i>Georgetown Universities</i> (P = 45, C = 2750) being key contributors. Emerging contributions from Asian institutions were noted, though citation impact remained lower. <i>Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery</i> was the most prolific and cited journal (P = 473, C = 23 113). Recent research hotspots identified through keyword analysis include <i>Biofilm</i>, <i>Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM)</i>, <i>Implant placement</i>, <i>contamination</i>, and <i>inflammation</i>. Most top-cited studies were of Level IV or V evidence. <b>Conclusion:</b> Research on CC is increasing, with a shift toward exploring biological mechanisms like biofilm formation and preventative measures such as ADM and implant positioning. Despite growing international interest, most evidence remains low quality. Future work should prioritize clinical studies that generate higher level of evidence and foster broader global collaboration to improve patient outcomes and refine surgical practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"22925503251379894"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12479447/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145207384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-29DOI: 10.1177/22925503251379889
Victor Gibrán Reyes-García, Giancarlo Talleri-Ornelas, Giancarlo Talleri-De Andrea, Jesús Fernando Gallardo-Garcia, Quitzia Libertad Torres-Salazar
Background: Postmastectomy pain syndrome (PMPS) is a chronic condition affecting up to 50% of mastectomy patients, characterized by persistent pain that significantly impairs quality of life. Lipofilling, the transplantation of autologous fat, has emerged as a potential treatment option, offering pain relief and functional improvements through its regenerative properties. This study evaluates the effectiveness of lipofilling in managing PMPS and its impact on patients' quality of life. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted on 26 women diagnosed with PMPS at a tertiary care hospital in Jalisco, Mexico. This study exclusively included patients who had undergone modified radical mastectomy (MRM) without any form of breast reconstruction, in order to isolate non-implant-related causes of PMPS. Pain intensity and quality of life were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and EQ-5D-3L questionnaire at baseline, two weeks, and two months post-treatment. The lipofilling procedure included fat harvesting, processing via centrifugation, and reinjection into the affected chest wall areas. Changes in outcomes were analyzed using paired t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: The median VAS score decreased significantly from baseline (6, IQR 5-7) to two months post-treatment (4, IQR 3-5, p < 0.05). Quality of life scores improved markedly in the domains of mobility and usual activities (p < 0.05). No significant adverse effects were observed. Conclusion: Lipofilling is an effective intervention for reducing PMPS and improving quality of life, offering a promising option for reconstructive postmastectomy care.
{"title":"Effectiveness of Lipofilling in Postmastectomy Pain Syndrome: A Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Victor Gibrán Reyes-García, Giancarlo Talleri-Ornelas, Giancarlo Talleri-De Andrea, Jesús Fernando Gallardo-Garcia, Quitzia Libertad Torres-Salazar","doi":"10.1177/22925503251379889","DOIUrl":"10.1177/22925503251379889","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Postmastectomy pain syndrome (PMPS) is a chronic condition affecting up to 50% of mastectomy patients, characterized by persistent pain that significantly impairs quality of life. Lipofilling, the transplantation of autologous fat, has emerged as a potential treatment option, offering pain relief and functional improvements through its regenerative properties. This study evaluates the effectiveness of lipofilling in managing PMPS and its impact on patients' quality of life. <b>Methods:</b> A prospective cohort study was conducted on 26 women diagnosed with PMPS at a tertiary care hospital in Jalisco, Mexico. This study exclusively included patients who had undergone modified radical mastectomy (MRM) without any form of breast reconstruction, in order to isolate non-implant-related causes of PMPS. Pain intensity and quality of life were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and EQ-5D-3L questionnaire at baseline, two weeks, and two months post-treatment. The lipofilling procedure included fat harvesting, processing via centrifugation, and reinjection into the affected chest wall areas. Changes in outcomes were analyzed using paired t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, with significance set at p < 0.05. <b>Results:</b> The median VAS score decreased significantly from baseline (6, IQR 5-7) to two months post-treatment (4, IQR 3-5, p < 0.05). Quality of life scores improved markedly in the domains of mobility and usual activities (p < 0.05). No significant adverse effects were observed. <b>Conclusion:</b> Lipofilling is an effective intervention for reducing PMPS and improving quality of life, offering a promising option for reconstructive postmastectomy care.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"22925503251379889"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12479460/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145207376","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-29DOI: 10.1177/22925503251379895
Chloe R Wong, Jacob Wise, Syena Moltaji, Heather L Baltzer, Jeffrey Fialkov
Introduction: This study assesses how Canadian Plastic Surgery Residency Instagram accounts are utilized and perceived by residents, fellows, and attending physicians, and evaluates their influence on medical students' residency program selection. Methods: This 2-part study includes: (1) a descriptive analysis of Instagram activity, content, and engagement, along with a national survey of Canadian plastic surgery residents, fellows, and attendings assessing account utility; and (2) a survey of medical students who attended the University of Toronto Plastic Surgery Residency Information Session, evaluating Instagram's influence on residency selection. Descriptive statistics were reported. Results: Twelve of 13 Canadian Plastic Surgery Residency Programs had active Instagram accounts. Canadian Plastic Surgery Residency Instagram accounts had an average of 119 posts (SD = 94) over 5 years (SD = 2). Among surveyed residents (N = 27/77, 35%) and fellows/attendings (N = 83/328, 25%), Instagram use was reported by 93% and 81%, respectively. Resident recruitment ranked as the top goal (residents 1.75, fellows/attendings 3.17), followed by achievement highlights. Most residents (80%) and fellows/attendings (53%) felt medical students benefitted most. Preferred content included program culture (85%, 84%), resident profiles (90%, 73%), and research highlights (70%, 70%). Among medical student respondents (N = 25/112, 22%), 95% followed Canadian programs on Instagram, seeking program culture, resident profiles, and educational opportunities (all 89%). Over half (56%) said Instagram influenced their perception of a program, with all reporting a positive impact. Conclusion: Instagram is a valuable platform for Canadian Plastic Surgery Residency Programs to share insights and influence medical student decision-making.
{"title":"Evaluating the Utility and Impact of Canadian Plastic Surgery Residency Programs' Instagram Accounts on Resident Recruitment and Engagement.","authors":"Chloe R Wong, Jacob Wise, Syena Moltaji, Heather L Baltzer, Jeffrey Fialkov","doi":"10.1177/22925503251379895","DOIUrl":"10.1177/22925503251379895","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> This study assesses how Canadian Plastic Surgery Residency Instagram accounts are utilized and perceived by residents, fellows, and attending physicians, and evaluates their influence on medical students' residency program selection. <b>Methods:</b> This 2-part study includes: (1) a descriptive analysis of Instagram activity, content, and engagement, along with a national survey of Canadian plastic surgery residents, fellows, and attendings assessing account utility; and (2) a survey of medical students who attended the University of Toronto Plastic Surgery Residency Information Session, evaluating Instagram's influence on residency selection. Descriptive statistics were reported. <b>Results:</b> Twelve of 13 Canadian Plastic Surgery Residency Programs had active Instagram accounts. Canadian Plastic Surgery Residency Instagram accounts had an average of 119 posts (SD = 94) over 5 years (SD = 2). Among surveyed residents (<i>N</i> = 27/77, 35%) and fellows/attendings (<i>N</i> = 83/328, 25%), Instagram use was reported by 93% and 81%, respectively. Resident recruitment ranked as the top goal (residents 1.75, fellows/attendings 3.17), followed by achievement highlights. Most residents (80%) and fellows/attendings (53%) felt medical students benefitted most. Preferred content included program culture (85%, 84%), resident profiles (90%, 73%), and research highlights (70%, 70%). Among medical student respondents (<i>N</i> = 25/112, 22%), 95% followed Canadian programs on Instagram, seeking program culture, resident profiles, and educational opportunities (all 89%). Over half (56%) said Instagram influenced their perception of a program, with all reporting a positive impact. <b>Conclusion:</b> Instagram is a valuable platform for Canadian Plastic Surgery Residency Programs to share insights and influence medical student decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"22925503251379895"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12479458/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145207354","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-25DOI: 10.1177/22925503251379893
Max J Abercrombie, Kenneth Liu, Majid Alimohammadi
Introduction: Despite carpal tunnel release (CTR) being a common procedure in hand surgery, variation in the location of the nerves supplying the palm leads to a high risk of iatrogenic damage. Recommendations have been made for a surgical incision placement that would avoid such damage, yet injury persists in clinical practice. These studies infrequently consider the safety of multiple at-risk nerves when making their recommendation, often optimizing the safety of one and subsequently jeopardizing another's. Methods: Sixty-one dissections were performed on formalin preserved cadavers to define a safe zone in the palm and recommend an incision placement for CTR. Detailed measurements examining the anatomy of the palmar cutaneous branch of the median nerve (PCBMN), the palmar cutaneous branch of the ulnar nerve (PCBUN), and the thenar motor branch (TMB) were taken relative the scaphoid tubercle, pisiform, or the A line. Results: The PCBMN was located 3.3 ± 4.1 mm ulnar to the scaphoid tubercle and 8.7 ± 3.9 mm radial to the A line. The PCBUN was located the 6.5 ± 2.4 mm radial and 6.6 ± 3.7 mm ulnar from the pisiform and A line respectively. The TMB was found 8.0 ± 3.3 mm from the A line and was classified as 56% extraligamentous, 31% subligamentous, and 13% transligamentous. Conclusion: We conclude that an area approximately 6 mm ulnar and 7 mm radial from the A line is the safe zone for CTR and recommend an incision placement in line with the radial aspect of the fourth digit. This knowledge may aid surgeons performing CTR and help reduce iatrogenic damage.
{"title":"An Anatomical Study of At-Risk Nerves During Carpal Tunnel Release: Considerations for the Prevention of Iatrogenic Nerve Injury.","authors":"Max J Abercrombie, Kenneth Liu, Majid Alimohammadi","doi":"10.1177/22925503251379893","DOIUrl":"10.1177/22925503251379893","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Despite carpal tunnel release (CTR) being a common procedure in hand surgery, variation in the location of the nerves supplying the palm leads to a high risk of iatrogenic damage. Recommendations have been made for a surgical incision placement that would avoid such damage, yet injury persists in clinical practice. These studies infrequently consider the safety of multiple at-risk nerves when making their recommendation, often optimizing the safety of one and subsequently jeopardizing another's. <b>Methods:</b> Sixty-one dissections were performed on formalin preserved cadavers to define a safe zone in the palm and recommend an incision placement for CTR. Detailed measurements examining the anatomy of the palmar cutaneous branch of the median nerve (PCBMN), the palmar cutaneous branch of the ulnar nerve (PCBUN), and the thenar motor branch (TMB) were taken relative the scaphoid tubercle, pisiform, or the A line. <b>Results:</b> The PCBMN was located 3.3 ± 4.1 mm ulnar to the scaphoid tubercle and 8.7 ± 3.9 mm radial to the A line. The PCBUN was located the 6.5 ± 2.4 mm radial and 6.6 ± 3.7 mm ulnar from the pisiform and A line respectively. The TMB was found 8.0 ± 3.3 mm from the A line and was classified as 56% extraligamentous, 31% subligamentous, and 13% transligamentous. <b>Conclusion:</b> We conclude that an area approximately 6 mm ulnar and 7 mm radial from the A line is the safe zone for CTR and recommend an incision placement in line with the radial aspect of the fourth digit. This knowledge may aid surgeons performing CTR and help reduce iatrogenic damage.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"22925503251379893"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12463864/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145186624","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-16DOI: 10.1177/22925503251375862
Stahs Pripotnev, Noah S Llaneras, Bob Teixeira, Erica Lee, Megan Patterson, Michelle Seu, Susan E Mackinnon
Introduction:Seddon and Sunderland's original nerve injury classification systems have stood the test of time over the last 70 years and continue to be widely used today. However, since those original descriptions, knowledge of nerve pathophysiology and healing has advanced, electrodiagnostic results have become more refined, and surgical options have increased. Methods: We offer a revisited review of the nerve injury classification to incorporate new knowledge for the modern era of nerve surgery. Results: We offer the addition of grades 0 and VI to the existing classification of nerve injuries based on Sunderland's framework, and we present a simplified classification that is patient and physician oriented, reflecting prognosis, time to recovery, and degree of recovery. Discussion: By following this nerve injury framework, clinicians can better assess, prognosticate, and manage patients.
{"title":"The Classification of Nerve Injury Revisited: Sunderland 0-VI.","authors":"Stahs Pripotnev, Noah S Llaneras, Bob Teixeira, Erica Lee, Megan Patterson, Michelle Seu, Susan E Mackinnon","doi":"10.1177/22925503251375862","DOIUrl":"10.1177/22925503251375862","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>:Seddon and Sunderland's original nerve injury classification systems have stood the test of time over the last 70 years and continue to be widely used today. However, since those original descriptions, knowledge of nerve pathophysiology and healing has advanced, electrodiagnostic results have become more refined, and surgical options have increased. <b>Methods</b>: We offer a revisited review of the nerve injury classification to incorporate new knowledge for the modern era of nerve surgery. <b>Results</b>: We offer the addition of grades 0 and VI to the existing classification of nerve injuries based on Sunderland's framework, and we present a simplified classification that is patient and physician oriented, reflecting prognosis, time to recovery, and degree of recovery. <b>Discussion</b>: By following this nerve injury framework, clinicians can better assess, prognosticate, and manage patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"22925503251375862"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12550730/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145378424","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-08DOI: 10.1177/22925503251371052
Idorenyin E Ndem, Grace Anne Longfellow, Christina N Kapsalis, Meredith A Kugar, Marcos Lopez, Lauren Cook, Nina Mehta, Jennifer Carr
Background: Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is characterized by compression of neurovascular structures within the thoracic outlet. Symptoms include upper-extremity paresthesias, weakness, and, in some-cases, effort-induced thrombosis. Implant-based breast reconstruction has been identified as a potential etiology of TOS given the anatomic relationship of the pectoralis muscles to the thoracic outlet. This study aims to investigate the relationship between implant-based reconstruction and TOS diagnosis. Methods: A retrospective, single-institution review was conducted to identify female subjects that presented for evaluation of TOS-like symptoms between April 2014 and December 2022. Results: 319 female patients presented to our institution for evaluation. Sixteen (5.0%) of these subjects previously underwent implant-based breast reconstruction, for which the following outcomes were considered: symptom type, timing to onset of symptoms relative to timing of reconstruction, and diagnosis of TOS as confirmed by imaging or testing. Seven of 16 patients (43.8%) received a formal diagnosis of TOS from a surgical specialist and were also found to have subpectoral implants. Conclusions: Based on clinical evidence, breast reconstruction has been acknowledged as a probable etiology for TOS. However, over half of symptomatic subjects did not receive a formal diagnosis of TOS, suggesting a potential for improvement in screening methods for this population. While the data of this study suggests that the plane of reconstruction, specifically subpectoral, could have an association with TOS, further research with a larger patient cohort is necessary to establish a definitive causal relationship.
{"title":"Thoracic Outlet Syndrome After Implant-based Breast Reconstruction.","authors":"Idorenyin E Ndem, Grace Anne Longfellow, Christina N Kapsalis, Meredith A Kugar, Marcos Lopez, Lauren Cook, Nina Mehta, Jennifer Carr","doi":"10.1177/22925503251371052","DOIUrl":"10.1177/22925503251371052","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is characterized by compression of neurovascular structures within the thoracic outlet. Symptoms include upper-extremity paresthesias, weakness, and, in some-cases, effort-induced thrombosis. Implant-based breast reconstruction has been identified as a potential etiology of TOS given the anatomic relationship of the pectoralis muscles to the thoracic outlet. This study aims to investigate the relationship between implant-based reconstruction and TOS diagnosis. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective, single-institution review was conducted to identify female subjects that presented for evaluation of TOS-like symptoms between April 2014 and December 2022. <b>Results:</b> 319 female patients presented to our institution for evaluation. Sixteen (5.0%) of these subjects previously underwent implant-based breast reconstruction, for which the following outcomes were considered: symptom type, timing to onset of symptoms relative to timing of reconstruction, and diagnosis of TOS as confirmed by imaging or testing. Seven of 16 patients (43.8%) received a formal diagnosis of TOS from a surgical specialist and were also found to have subpectoral implants. <b>Conclusions:</b> Based on clinical evidence, breast reconstruction has been acknowledged as a probable etiology for TOS. However, over half of symptomatic subjects did not receive a formal diagnosis of TOS, suggesting a potential for improvement in screening methods for this population. While the data of this study suggests that the plane of reconstruction, specifically subpectoral, could have an association with TOS, further research with a larger patient cohort is necessary to establish a definitive causal relationship.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"22925503251371052"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417449/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145041108","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Emergency department (ED) visits following elective surgeries place significant strain on already overburdened healthcare systems. In Nova Scotia, carpal tunnel release (CTR) and trigger finger release (TFR) are the most common elective hand surgeries performed. This study sought to determine the rates, reasons, and risk factors associated with ED visits following elective outpatient hand surgery. Methods: Patients who underwent CTR or TFR between April 1, 2016 and March 31, 2022, and visited any Nova Scotia ED within 90 days of surgery were identified using provincial healthcare databases. A chart review was completed to explore ED timing, reasons for presentation, and predetermined systems-level factors. Results: During the retrospective period, 2690 patients underwent CTR and 1103 patients underwent TFR. For CTR, 159 patients (5.97%) presented to the ED within 90 days of surgery for surgery-specific concerns. The most common presentation was surgical site infection (2.16%), wound check (1.60%), and suture removal (1.04%). For TFR, 63 (5.71%) patients presented to the ED within 90 days. Similarly, surgical site infection was the most common presentation (2.63%) followed by suture removal (1.45%) and wound check (1.18%). The most frequent timing for ED presentation was days 13-15 (27.9%). Conclusion: In an evaluation of true healthcare utilization after elective surgery, ED visits for surgery-specific concerns after CTR and TFR were nearly 6%, far exceeding expected complication rates. As the presentations are manageable in an outpatient clinic or office setting, a mixed-methods patient-oriented intervention is planned to redirect this population away from the ED.
{"title":"Emergency Department Visits Within 90 Days of Elective Hand Surgery: A Healthcare Utilization Study.","authors":"Katie Ross, Haley Glazebrook, Jo-Anne Douglas, Justin MacLellan, Emily M Krauss","doi":"10.1177/22925503251371057","DOIUrl":"10.1177/22925503251371057","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Emergency department (ED) visits following elective surgeries place significant strain on already overburdened healthcare systems. In Nova Scotia, carpal tunnel release (CTR) and trigger finger release (TFR) are the most common elective hand surgeries performed. This study sought to determine the rates, reasons, and risk factors associated with ED visits following elective outpatient hand surgery. <b>Methods:</b> Patients who underwent CTR or TFR between April 1, 2016 and March 31, 2022, and visited any Nova Scotia ED within 90 days of surgery were identified using provincial healthcare databases. A chart review was completed to explore ED timing, reasons for presentation, and predetermined systems-level factors. <b>Results:</b> During the retrospective period, 2690 patients underwent CTR and 1103 patients underwent TFR. For CTR, 159 patients (5.97%) presented to the ED within 90 days of surgery for surgery-specific concerns. The most common presentation was surgical site infection (2.16%), wound check (1.60%), and suture removal (1.04%). For TFR, 63 (5.71%) patients presented to the ED within 90 days. Similarly, surgical site infection was the most common presentation (2.63%) followed by suture removal (1.45%) and wound check (1.18%). The most frequent timing for ED presentation was days 13-15 (27.9%). <b>Conclusion:</b> In an evaluation of true healthcare utilization after elective surgery, ED visits for surgery-specific concerns after CTR and TFR were nearly 6%, far exceeding expected complication rates. As the presentations are manageable in an outpatient clinic or office setting, a mixed-methods patient-oriented intervention is planned to redirect this population away from the ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"22925503251371057"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12408531/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145016029","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}