Pub Date : 2025-09-08DOI: 10.1177/22925503251371052
Idorenyin E Ndem, Grace Anne Longfellow, Christina N Kapsalis, Meredith A Kugar, Marcos Lopez, Lauren Cook, Nina Mehta, Jennifer Carr
Background: Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is characterized by compression of neurovascular structures within the thoracic outlet. Symptoms include upper-extremity paresthesias, weakness, and, in some-cases, effort-induced thrombosis. Implant-based breast reconstruction has been identified as a potential etiology of TOS given the anatomic relationship of the pectoralis muscles to the thoracic outlet. This study aims to investigate the relationship between implant-based reconstruction and TOS diagnosis. Methods: A retrospective, single-institution review was conducted to identify female subjects that presented for evaluation of TOS-like symptoms between April 2014 and December 2022. Results: 319 female patients presented to our institution for evaluation. Sixteen (5.0%) of these subjects previously underwent implant-based breast reconstruction, for which the following outcomes were considered: symptom type, timing to onset of symptoms relative to timing of reconstruction, and diagnosis of TOS as confirmed by imaging or testing. Seven of 16 patients (43.8%) received a formal diagnosis of TOS from a surgical specialist and were also found to have subpectoral implants. Conclusions: Based on clinical evidence, breast reconstruction has been acknowledged as a probable etiology for TOS. However, over half of symptomatic subjects did not receive a formal diagnosis of TOS, suggesting a potential for improvement in screening methods for this population. While the data of this study suggests that the plane of reconstruction, specifically subpectoral, could have an association with TOS, further research with a larger patient cohort is necessary to establish a definitive causal relationship.
{"title":"Thoracic Outlet Syndrome After Implant-based Breast Reconstruction.","authors":"Idorenyin E Ndem, Grace Anne Longfellow, Christina N Kapsalis, Meredith A Kugar, Marcos Lopez, Lauren Cook, Nina Mehta, Jennifer Carr","doi":"10.1177/22925503251371052","DOIUrl":"10.1177/22925503251371052","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is characterized by compression of neurovascular structures within the thoracic outlet. Symptoms include upper-extremity paresthesias, weakness, and, in some-cases, effort-induced thrombosis. Implant-based breast reconstruction has been identified as a potential etiology of TOS given the anatomic relationship of the pectoralis muscles to the thoracic outlet. This study aims to investigate the relationship between implant-based reconstruction and TOS diagnosis. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective, single-institution review was conducted to identify female subjects that presented for evaluation of TOS-like symptoms between April 2014 and December 2022. <b>Results:</b> 319 female patients presented to our institution for evaluation. Sixteen (5.0%) of these subjects previously underwent implant-based breast reconstruction, for which the following outcomes were considered: symptom type, timing to onset of symptoms relative to timing of reconstruction, and diagnosis of TOS as confirmed by imaging or testing. Seven of 16 patients (43.8%) received a formal diagnosis of TOS from a surgical specialist and were also found to have subpectoral implants. <b>Conclusions:</b> Based on clinical evidence, breast reconstruction has been acknowledged as a probable etiology for TOS. However, over half of symptomatic subjects did not receive a formal diagnosis of TOS, suggesting a potential for improvement in screening methods for this population. While the data of this study suggests that the plane of reconstruction, specifically subpectoral, could have an association with TOS, further research with a larger patient cohort is necessary to establish a definitive causal relationship.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"22925503251371052"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417449/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145041108","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Emergency department (ED) visits following elective surgeries place significant strain on already overburdened healthcare systems. In Nova Scotia, carpal tunnel release (CTR) and trigger finger release (TFR) are the most common elective hand surgeries performed. This study sought to determine the rates, reasons, and risk factors associated with ED visits following elective outpatient hand surgery. Methods: Patients who underwent CTR or TFR between April 1, 2016 and March 31, 2022, and visited any Nova Scotia ED within 90 days of surgery were identified using provincial healthcare databases. A chart review was completed to explore ED timing, reasons for presentation, and predetermined systems-level factors. Results: During the retrospective period, 2690 patients underwent CTR and 1103 patients underwent TFR. For CTR, 159 patients (5.97%) presented to the ED within 90 days of surgery for surgery-specific concerns. The most common presentation was surgical site infection (2.16%), wound check (1.60%), and suture removal (1.04%). For TFR, 63 (5.71%) patients presented to the ED within 90 days. Similarly, surgical site infection was the most common presentation (2.63%) followed by suture removal (1.45%) and wound check (1.18%). The most frequent timing for ED presentation was days 13-15 (27.9%). Conclusion: In an evaluation of true healthcare utilization after elective surgery, ED visits for surgery-specific concerns after CTR and TFR were nearly 6%, far exceeding expected complication rates. As the presentations are manageable in an outpatient clinic or office setting, a mixed-methods patient-oriented intervention is planned to redirect this population away from the ED.
{"title":"Emergency Department Visits Within 90 Days of Elective Hand Surgery: A Healthcare Utilization Study.","authors":"Katie Ross, Haley Glazebrook, Jo-Anne Douglas, Justin MacLellan, Emily M Krauss","doi":"10.1177/22925503251371057","DOIUrl":"10.1177/22925503251371057","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Emergency department (ED) visits following elective surgeries place significant strain on already overburdened healthcare systems. In Nova Scotia, carpal tunnel release (CTR) and trigger finger release (TFR) are the most common elective hand surgeries performed. This study sought to determine the rates, reasons, and risk factors associated with ED visits following elective outpatient hand surgery. <b>Methods:</b> Patients who underwent CTR or TFR between April 1, 2016 and March 31, 2022, and visited any Nova Scotia ED within 90 days of surgery were identified using provincial healthcare databases. A chart review was completed to explore ED timing, reasons for presentation, and predetermined systems-level factors. <b>Results:</b> During the retrospective period, 2690 patients underwent CTR and 1103 patients underwent TFR. For CTR, 159 patients (5.97%) presented to the ED within 90 days of surgery for surgery-specific concerns. The most common presentation was surgical site infection (2.16%), wound check (1.60%), and suture removal (1.04%). For TFR, 63 (5.71%) patients presented to the ED within 90 days. Similarly, surgical site infection was the most common presentation (2.63%) followed by suture removal (1.45%) and wound check (1.18%). The most frequent timing for ED presentation was days 13-15 (27.9%). <b>Conclusion:</b> In an evaluation of true healthcare utilization after elective surgery, ED visits for surgery-specific concerns after CTR and TFR were nearly 6%, far exceeding expected complication rates. As the presentations are manageable in an outpatient clinic or office setting, a mixed-methods patient-oriented intervention is planned to redirect this population away from the ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"22925503251371057"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12408531/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145016029","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-29DOI: 10.1177/22925503251371048
Justin J Lee, Nikhil Patil, Trent Schimmel, Matthew D Benson, Joshua J DeSerres
Background: Surgical repair of orbital fractures comes with risks. One rare risk is interference with the actions of the superior oblique tendon-muscle complex causing an acquired Brown syndrome. We present the case of a 45-year-old man who developed acquired Brown syndrome after undergoing repair of a large orbital floor and medial orbital wall fracture using a titanium mesh implant. A case report was prepared to discuss a rare surgical risk with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of an orbital wall fracture. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed. Results: Post-operative ophthalmological assessment revealed persistent diplopia along with limitations of up-gaze particularly in the adducted position. Ultimately, the patient underwent surgical repositioning of the orbital implant, which seemingly released the superior oblique muscle-tendon complex, resolving most of the diplopia. No further treatment with prisms or strabismus surgery has been required. Conclusions: Acquired Brown syndrome is a potential risk of surgical repair of orbital fractures involving the medial orbital wall. Herein this case study, we describe a case of acquired Brown syndrome following ORIF of an orbital floor and medial wall fracture, which was alleviated with a revision surgery.
{"title":"Acquired Brown Syndrome as a Postoperative Complication of Orbital Wall Fracture Repair with Metallic Mesh.","authors":"Justin J Lee, Nikhil Patil, Trent Schimmel, Matthew D Benson, Joshua J DeSerres","doi":"10.1177/22925503251371048","DOIUrl":"10.1177/22925503251371048","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Surgical repair of orbital fractures comes with risks. One rare risk is interference with the actions of the superior oblique tendon-muscle complex causing an acquired Brown syndrome. We present the case of a 45-year-old man who developed acquired Brown syndrome after undergoing repair of a large orbital floor and medial orbital wall fracture using a titanium mesh implant. A case report was prepared to discuss a rare surgical risk with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of an orbital wall fracture. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective chart review was performed. <b>Results:</b> Post-operative ophthalmological assessment revealed persistent diplopia along with limitations of up-gaze particularly in the adducted position. Ultimately, the patient underwent surgical repositioning of the orbital implant, which seemingly released the superior oblique muscle-tendon complex, resolving most of the diplopia. No further treatment with prisms or strabismus surgery has been required. <b>Conclusions:</b> Acquired Brown syndrome is a potential risk of surgical repair of orbital fractures involving the medial orbital wall. Herein this case study, we describe a case of acquired Brown syndrome following ORIF of an orbital floor and medial wall fracture, which was alleviated with a revision surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"22925503251371048"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12397089/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144966082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-29DOI: 10.1177/22925503251371051
Norbert Banyi, Theresa Buchel, Young Ji Tuen, Sophia Shayan, Rebecca Courtemanche, Jugpal S Arneja
Introduction: The landscape of academic research has evolved notably in recent decades, shifting towards earlier career publications and more interdisciplinary collaborations. This study aims to identify research productivity trends among Canadian academic plastic surgeons. Methods: The Web of Science and MEDLINE databases were searched by plastic surgeon names and for each result, the author list position, year of publication, journal, and citation counts were collected. Surgeons' demographics, including gender and medical school graduation year, were obtained from provincial college websites. Publication rates over a plastic surgeon's career trajectory were analyzed by surgeons' current decade of practice. Results: There were 3661 included entries in our database, corresponding to 2831 unique publications by 245 surgeons (71%, 175/245 men). The median year of medical school graduation was 2002 (SD 12 years). Surgeons in more recent decades of practice (decade 1 or decade 2) published earlier and more frequently per career decade. A wide distribution of publication rates (range 0-66) was found for surgeons currently in their fourth decade of practice. From 2005 to 2020, the number of publications per year increased dramatically, from 36 publications in 2005 to 198 publications in 2020. Citations normalized by years from publication remained stable. The proportion of first authorship decreased from 0.63 and 0.42 in the pre-medicine and educational decades, to 0.09 and 0.08 by the third and fourth decades of practice (p < .001). Conclusion: An emerging trend of earlier and increased publications among newer generations of surgeons was seen. Incentives to participate and mentor in research for surgeons gaining seniority are suggested.
引言:近几十年来,学术研究的格局发生了显著的变化,转向早期的职业出版物和更多的跨学科合作。本研究旨在确定加拿大学术整形外科医生的研究生产力趋势。方法:通过Web of Science和MEDLINE数据库检索整形外科医生的姓名,并收集每个结果的作者名单位置、发表年份、期刊和被引次数。外科医生的人口统计数据,包括性别和医学院毕业年份,从省级高校网站获得。在整形外科医生的职业生涯轨迹中,发表率是根据外科医生目前十年的实践来分析的。结果:我们的数据库中有3661条纳入条目,对应245名外科医生的2831篇独特出版物(71%,175/245名男性)。医学院毕业年份中位数为2002年(标准差12年)。外科医生在近几十年的实践中(第1年或第2年)每十年发表的时间更早,频率更高。发表率分布广泛(范围0-66)的外科医生目前在他们的执业第四个十年。从2005年到2020年,每年的出版物数量急剧增加,从2005年的36篇增加到2020年的198篇。从出版开始按年份标准化的引文保持稳定。第一作者比例从医学预科和教育十年的0.63和0.42下降到第三和第四个十年的0.09和0.08 (p结论:在新一代外科医生中出现了早期和增加发表论文的趋势。建议为获得资历的外科医生提供参与和指导研究的激励措施。
{"title":"Publication Trajectories of Today's Canadian Academic Plastic Surgeons: A Bibliometric Analysis.","authors":"Norbert Banyi, Theresa Buchel, Young Ji Tuen, Sophia Shayan, Rebecca Courtemanche, Jugpal S Arneja","doi":"10.1177/22925503251371051","DOIUrl":"10.1177/22925503251371051","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> The landscape of academic research has evolved notably in recent decades, shifting towards earlier career publications and more interdisciplinary collaborations. This study aims to identify research productivity trends among Canadian academic plastic surgeons. <b>Methods:</b> The Web of Science and MEDLINE databases were searched by plastic surgeon names and for each result, the author list position, year of publication, journal, and citation counts were collected. Surgeons' demographics, including gender and medical school graduation year, were obtained from provincial college websites. Publication rates over a plastic surgeon's career trajectory were analyzed by surgeons' current decade of practice. <b>Results:</b> There were 3661 included entries in our database, corresponding to 2831 unique publications by 245 surgeons (71%, 175/245 men). The median year of medical school graduation was 2002 (SD 12 years). Surgeons in more recent decades of practice (decade 1 or decade 2) published earlier and more frequently per career decade. A wide distribution of publication rates (range 0-66) was found for surgeons currently in their fourth decade of practice. From 2005 to 2020, the number of publications per year increased dramatically, from 36 publications in 2005 to 198 publications in 2020. Citations normalized by years from publication remained stable. The proportion of first authorship decreased from 0.63 and 0.42 in the pre-medicine and educational decades, to 0.09 and 0.08 by the third and fourth decades of practice (p < .001). <b>Conclusion:</b> An emerging trend of earlier and increased publications among newer generations of surgeons was seen. Incentives to participate and mentor in research for surgeons gaining seniority are suggested.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"22925503251371051"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12397090/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144966005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-26DOI: 10.1177/22925503251363108
Melissa Chao, Kellan Woo, David Long, Dana Toameh, Kathryn V Isaac
Introduction: Despite rising rates of post-mastectomy immediate breast reconstruction (IBR), there are fears of local recurrence (LR) among patients and physicians. This systematic review and meta-analysis compare long-term LR incidence in patients with mastectomy and IBR (Mast + IBR) to patients with mastectomy alone (Mast - IBR). Methods: Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant articles. Articles published between January 2000 and December 2020 were included when LR rates were reported for patients with breast cancer (stage I or II) who underwent mastectomy with or without IBR. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI), adjusted for age, and follow-up time. Results: In total, 1475 unique articles were identified, with 1434 excluded in title abstract screening and 31 excluded in full-text screening. Ten articles, amounting to 15 173 patients (3478 Mast + IBR, 11 695 Mast - IBR), were included. In total, 111 (3.2%) patients in Mast + IBR experienced LR after a mean follow-up time of 72.9 months, while 245 (2.1%) in Mast - IBR experienced LR after a mean follow-up time of 73.3 months. There were no increased odds of LR in Mast + IBR, adjusted for age, and follow-up time (OR 1.17, CI 0.86-1.59, P = 0.59). Conclusion: This meta-analysis supports that IBR is not associated with increased LR odds compared to mastectomy alone. Patients with breast cancer may undergo mastectomy and IBR without concern of increased rates of LR, which contributes to improved quality of life.
导语:尽管乳房切除术后立即乳房重建(IBR)的比例不断上升,但患者和医生仍然担心局部复发(LR)。本系统综述和荟萃分析比较了乳房切除术和IBR患者(Mast + IBR)和单独乳房切除术患者(Mast - IBR)的长期LR发病率。方法:检索Medline、Embase和Web of Science数据库的相关文章。2000年1月至2020年12月期间发表的文章被纳入了有或没有IBR的乳房切除术的乳腺癌(I期或II期)患者的LR率报告。使用随机效应模型计算合并优势比(or), 95%置信区间(CI),调整年龄和随访时间。结果:共鉴定出1475篇独特的文章,其中1434篇被排除在标题摘要筛选之外,31篇被排除在全文筛选之外。纳入10篇文章,共15173例患者(3478例Mast + IBR, 11695例Mast - IBR)。总体而言,111例(3.2%)Mast + IBR患者在平均随访时间为72.9个月后出现LR,而245例(2.1%)Mast - IBR患者在平均随访时间为73.3个月后出现LR。经年龄和随访时间调整后,Mast + IBR患者发生LR的几率没有增加(OR 1.17, CI 0.86-1.59, P = 0.59)。结论:这一荟萃分析支持IBR与单纯乳房切除术相比与LR风险增加无关。乳腺癌患者可以接受乳房切除术和IBR,而不必担心LR的发生率增加,这有助于提高生活质量。
{"title":"Breast Cancer Local Recurrence in Patients With and Without Post-Mastectomy Immediate Breast Reconstruction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Melissa Chao, Kellan Woo, David Long, Dana Toameh, Kathryn V Isaac","doi":"10.1177/22925503251363108","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503251363108","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Despite rising rates of post-mastectomy immediate breast reconstruction (IBR), there are fears of local recurrence (LR) among patients and physicians. This systematic review and meta-analysis compare long-term LR incidence in patients with mastectomy and IBR (Mast + IBR) to patients with mastectomy alone (Mast - IBR). <b>Methods:</b> Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant articles. Articles published between January 2000 and December 2020 were included when LR rates were reported for patients with breast cancer (stage I or II) who underwent mastectomy with or without IBR. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI), adjusted for age, and follow-up time. <b>Results:</b> In total, 1475 unique articles were identified, with 1434 excluded in title abstract screening and 31 excluded in full-text screening. Ten articles, amounting to 15 173 patients (3478 Mast + IBR, 11 695 Mast - IBR), were included. In total, 111 (3.2%) patients in Mast + IBR experienced LR after a mean follow-up time of 72.9 months, while 245 (2.1%) in Mast - IBR experienced LR after a mean follow-up time of 73.3 months. There were no increased odds of LR in Mast + IBR, adjusted for age, and follow-up time (OR 1.17, CI 0.86-1.59, <i>P</i> = 0.59). <b>Conclusion:</b> This meta-analysis supports that IBR is not associated with increased LR odds compared to mastectomy alone. Patients with breast cancer may undergo mastectomy and IBR without concern of increased rates of LR, which contributes to improved quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"22925503251363108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12380726/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144965014","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-17DOI: 10.1177/22925503251368749
Anna-Lisa V Nguyen, Rebecca Courtemanche, Mirko S Gilardino, Jugpal S Arneja
{"title":"Industry Payments to Plastic Surgeons: A Blind Spot for Physician Accountability in Canada.","authors":"Anna-Lisa V Nguyen, Rebecca Courtemanche, Mirko S Gilardino, Jugpal S Arneja","doi":"10.1177/22925503251368749","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503251368749","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"22925503251368749"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12361167/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144965946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-17DOI: 10.1177/22925503251368745
David L Wallace, Alan D Rogers
{"title":"Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections: A Call for Surgical Competence and System-Level Reform.","authors":"David L Wallace, Alan D Rogers","doi":"10.1177/22925503251368745","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503251368745","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"22925503251368745"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12361182/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144965981","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-12DOI: 10.1177/22925503251364257
Samantha Cervantes-Valadez, Andrea P Muñoz-Villalvazo, Ana M Romero-Avendaño, Alexander Cardenas-Mejia, José E Telich-Tarriba
Introduction: Sensory function in the V2 and V3 territories of the trigeminal nerve is critical for facial sensation and quality of life. Injuries to these branches often result in significant sensory deficits, impairing daily activities. Nerve transfer techniques offer potential solutions for restoring lost sensation for patients with loss of proximal nerve stump, central pathway damage, or in the presence of large nerve gaps. However, they remain underutilized in clinical practice. Objective: This systematic review assesses the feasibility and effectiveness of nerve transfer techniques for sensory reconstruction of the V2 and V3 territories. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases was conducted. Studies reporting sensory reconstruction outcomes, such as 2-point discrimination (2PD) or directional brush stroke detection, were included. Articles published from 2009 to 2024 were reviewed, alongside relevant references outside this timeframe providing important clinical insights. Ten studies meeting the inclusion criteria were analyzed, and their quality was assessed using PRISMA guidelines. Results: Sixteen patients (mean age: 32.1 years) and 24 repairs were identified. Trigeminal nerve injuries resulted from surgical complications (31.2%), trauma (25%), and oncological resections (18%) in most cases. Sixty-six percent of cases underwent cross-facial nerve grafts (CFNG), while the remaining repairs were reconstructed using regional nerve transfers. Recovery times varied, with a mean follow-up of 20.6 months. All patients achieved significant improvement in facial sensation and symptoms. Conclusion: CFNGs and nerve transfers are effective for restoring sensation in V2 and V3 territories, with promising recovery rates. Larger studies with extended follow-ups are needed to refine and validate these techniques.
简介:三叉神经V2和V3区域的感觉功能对面部感觉和生活质量至关重要。这些分支的损伤通常会导致严重的感觉缺陷,影响日常活动。神经移植技术为近端神经残端缺失、中枢神经通路损伤或存在大神经间隙的患者提供了恢复感觉丧失的潜在解决方案。然而,它们在临床实践中仍未得到充分利用。目的:系统评价神经移植技术用于V2和V3区域感觉重建的可行性和有效性。方法:综合检索PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus数据库。包括报告感觉重建结果的研究,如两点辨别(2PD)或定向笔触检测。回顾了2009年至2024年发表的文章,以及这一时间段之外的相关参考文献,提供了重要的临床见解。对符合纳入标准的10项研究进行分析,并使用PRISMA指南对其质量进行评估。结果:16例患者(平均年龄:32.1岁),24例修复。三叉神经损伤主要由手术并发症(31.2%)、外伤(25%)和肿瘤切除(18%)引起。66%的病例接受了面神经移植(CFNG),而其余的修复则采用局部神经移植重建。恢复时间各不相同,平均随访20.6个月。所有患者的面部感觉和症状均有显著改善。结论:CFNGs和神经移植能有效恢复V2和V3区域的感觉,恢复率高。需要更大规模的随访研究来完善和验证这些技术。
{"title":"Sensory Restoration of Trigeminal Nerve Territories V2 and V3 Using Nerve Transfers: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Samantha Cervantes-Valadez, Andrea P Muñoz-Villalvazo, Ana M Romero-Avendaño, Alexander Cardenas-Mejia, José E Telich-Tarriba","doi":"10.1177/22925503251364257","DOIUrl":"10.1177/22925503251364257","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Sensory function in the V2 and V3 territories of the trigeminal nerve is critical for facial sensation and quality of life. Injuries to these branches often result in significant sensory deficits, impairing daily activities. Nerve transfer techniques offer potential solutions for restoring lost sensation for patients with loss of proximal nerve stump, central pathway damage, or in the presence of large nerve gaps. However, they remain underutilized in clinical practice. <b>Objective:</b> This systematic review assesses the feasibility and effectiveness of nerve transfer techniques for sensory reconstruction of the V2 and V3 territories. <b>Methods:</b> A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases was conducted. Studies reporting sensory reconstruction outcomes, such as 2-point discrimination (2PD) or directional brush stroke detection, were included. Articles published from 2009 to 2024 were reviewed, alongside relevant references outside this timeframe providing important clinical insights. Ten studies meeting the inclusion criteria were analyzed, and their quality was assessed using PRISMA guidelines. <b>Results:</b> Sixteen patients (mean age: 32.1 years) and 24 repairs were identified. Trigeminal nerve injuries resulted from surgical complications (31.2%), trauma (25%), and oncological resections (18%) in most cases. Sixty-six percent of cases underwent cross-facial nerve grafts (CFNG), while the remaining repairs were reconstructed using regional nerve transfers. Recovery times varied, with a mean follow-up of 20.6 months. All patients achieved significant improvement in facial sensation and symptoms. <b>Conclusion:</b> CFNGs and nerve transfers are effective for restoring sensation in V2 and V3 territories, with promising recovery rates. Larger studies with extended follow-ups are needed to refine and validate these techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"22925503251364257"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12343539/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144856135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-11DOI: 10.1177/22925503251334564
Ron Barry Somogyi
{"title":"Commentary on: The Sequence and Reconstructive Modality of Breast Cancer Treatments Affects Wait Times to Adjunctive Therapies in Patients Undergoing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction.","authors":"Ron Barry Somogyi","doi":"10.1177/22925503251334564","DOIUrl":"10.1177/22925503251334564","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"22925503251334564"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12339477/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144848342","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-08DOI: 10.1177/22925503251363056
Andrew T Chen, Carolyn Wang, Victor Ripan, Elena Huang, Avalon O'Connor, Patrick J Kim, Emily Dunn, Achilleas Thoma, Helene Retrouvey
Introduction: Kirschner-wire (K-wire) fixation (KF) is the most common operative technique for hand fractures among Canadian plastic surgeons. However, postoperative rehabilitation varies widely and rely on low-quality studies and expert opinion. The study reviewed KFs of phalangeal and metacarpal fractures at a single academic center to quantify practice variation and patient outcomes. Methods: This retrospective chart review analyzed all cases of KF of isolated phalangeal and metacarpal fractures performed by all plastic surgeons at a single tertiary care center in the last 7 years. The primary outcome was the duration from operation to K-wire removal. Secondary outcomes included the time from KF to range of motion (ROM) initiation, the interval between K-wire removal and ROM initiation, postoperative complications, and functional outcomes. Results:Among 289 patients, mean time from KF to K-wire removal was 28.6 days (SD 8.2). There was a high variability among the surgeons, with the shortest duration averaging 26 ± 6 days and the longest averaging 33.7 ± 8.6 days (P < .001). Mean time to initiation of ROM was similar across surgeons (mean 25.2 ± 11.4 days). Postoperative complications occurred in 26 patients (10.9%), primarily pin site infections (6.7%). Early versus late K-wire removal did not affect complication rates. There were no differences in functional outcomes between surgeons. Conclusion: There is considerable variability in postoperative rehabilitation following KF of hand fractures among surgeons at a single academic center. Our study suggests that supervised ROM can be initiated safely as early as 3 weeks postoperatively, regardless of whether K-wires remain in situ.
{"title":"Postoperative Management of Kirschner-Wire Fixation of All Phalangeal and Metacarpal Fractures at a Single Tertiary Care Center: A Retrospective Review.","authors":"Andrew T Chen, Carolyn Wang, Victor Ripan, Elena Huang, Avalon O'Connor, Patrick J Kim, Emily Dunn, Achilleas Thoma, Helene Retrouvey","doi":"10.1177/22925503251363056","DOIUrl":"10.1177/22925503251363056","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Kirschner-wire (K-wire) fixation (KF) is the most common operative technique for hand fractures among Canadian plastic surgeons. However, postoperative rehabilitation varies widely and rely on low-quality studies and expert opinion. The study reviewed KFs of phalangeal and metacarpal fractures at a single academic center to quantify practice variation and patient outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective chart review analyzed all cases of KF of isolated phalangeal and metacarpal fractures performed by all plastic surgeons at a single tertiary care center in the last 7 years. The primary outcome was the duration from operation to K-wire removal. Secondary outcomes included the time from KF to range of motion (ROM) initiation, the interval between K-wire removal and ROM initiation, postoperative complications, and functional outcomes. <b>Results:</b>Among 289 patients, mean time from KF to K-wire removal was 28.6 days (SD 8.2). There was a high variability among the surgeons, with the shortest duration averaging 26 ± 6 days and the longest averaging 33.7 ± 8.6 days (<i>P</i> < .001). Mean time to initiation of ROM was similar across surgeons (mean 25.2 ± 11.4 days). Postoperative complications occurred in 26 patients (10.9%), primarily pin site infections (6.7%). Early versus late K-wire removal did not affect complication rates. There were no differences in functional outcomes between surgeons. <b>Conclusion:</b> There is considerable variability in postoperative rehabilitation following KF of hand fractures among surgeons at a single academic center. Our study suggests that supervised ROM can be initiated safely as early as 3 weeks postoperatively, regardless of whether K-wires remain in situ.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"22925503251363056"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12334410/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144817269","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}