Pub Date : 2020-11-13eCollection Date: 2020-11-01DOI: 10.1515/pp-2020-0143
Lakhdar Khellaf, Philippe Rouanet
Peritoneal metastases from signet ring cell adenocarcinoma may be overlooked at laparoscopy, resulting in problematic false-negative diagnoses. Conversely, false-positive diagnoses are rarely reported. For the surgeon, cachexia may rise suspicion for peritoneal metastases by exhibiting a worrisome micronodular appearance of the peritoneum, and atrophic adipocytes looks like signet ring cells at the microscopical level. Being aware of this underdiagnosed condition may help avoiding unfortunate false-positive diagnoses of peritoneal metastases during intraoperative consultation.
{"title":"Peritoneal biopsy frozen section: cachexia manifesting as signet ring-like cells.","authors":"Lakhdar Khellaf, Philippe Rouanet","doi":"10.1515/pp-2020-0143","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2020-0143","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peritoneal metastases from signet ring cell adenocarcinoma may be overlooked at laparoscopy, resulting in problematic false-negative diagnoses. Conversely, false-positive diagnoses are rarely reported. For the surgeon, cachexia may rise suspicion for peritoneal metastases by exhibiting a worrisome micronodular appearance of the peritoneum, and atrophic adipocytes looks like signet ring cells at the microscopical level. Being aware of this underdiagnosed condition may help avoiding unfortunate false-positive diagnoses of peritoneal metastases during intraoperative consultation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20231,"journal":{"name":"Pleura and Peritoneum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2020-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/pp-2020-0143","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25364198","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-11-09eCollection Date: 2020-11-01DOI: 10.1515/pp-2020-0129
Gabrielle Drevet, Jean-Michel Maury, Naoual Bakrin, François Tronc
Objectives: Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a devastating evolution of several malignancies. Pressurized intrathoracic aerosol chemotherapy (PITAC) might be a novel therapy option in MPE.
Methods: PITAC is considered for patients with MPE with a performance status <2 and without other metastatic sites. General anesthesia is administered and a double-lumen bronchial tube is inserted. The patient is placed in a lateral decubitus position, and the operation is performed after ipsilateral lung exclusion. Two 12-mm balloon trocars are inserted-one in the seventh intercostal space in the mid-axillary line and one in the fifth intercostal space in the anterior axillary line. Extent of pleural disease and volume of MPE are documented. MPE is removed and parietal pleural biopsy are performed. An intrathoracic pressure of 12 mmHg CO2 is established, and a combination of Cisplatin (10.5 mg/m2 in a total volume of 150 cc NaCl 0.9%) and Doxorubicin (2.1 mg/m2 in a total volume of 50 cc NaCl 0.9%) are aerosolized via nebulizer in the pleural cavity. Vital signs and nebulization are remote-controlled. After 30 min, the remaining toxic aerosol is exhausted using a closed surgical smoke evacuation system. A 24Fr chest tube is inserted in postero-apical position with continuous negative pressure of 20 cm H2O. When needed, PITAC may be repeated every six weeks in alternate with systemic chemotherapy.
Results: In our hands, the technique above has shown to be feasible and safe.
Conclusions: Further studies are needed to assess the potential symptomatic and oncological benefits of PITAC in MPE.
{"title":"Technique of pressurized intrathoracic aerosol chemotherapy (PITAC) for malignant pleural effusion.","authors":"Gabrielle Drevet, Jean-Michel Maury, Naoual Bakrin, François Tronc","doi":"10.1515/pp-2020-0129","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2020-0129","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a devastating evolution of several malignancies. Pressurized intrathoracic aerosol chemotherapy (PITAC) might be a novel therapy option in MPE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PITAC is considered for patients with MPE with a performance status <2 and without other metastatic sites. General anesthesia is administered and a double-lumen bronchial tube is inserted. The patient is placed in a lateral decubitus position, and the operation is performed after ipsilateral lung exclusion. Two 12-mm balloon trocars are inserted-one in the seventh intercostal space in the mid-axillary line and one in the fifth intercostal space in the anterior axillary line. Extent of pleural disease and volume of MPE are documented. MPE is removed and parietal pleural biopsy are performed. An intrathoracic pressure of 12 mmHg CO<sub>2</sub> is established, and a combination of Cisplatin (10.5 mg/m<sup>2</sup> in a total volume of 150 cc NaCl 0.9%) and Doxorubicin (2.1 mg/m<sup>2</sup> in a total volume of 50 cc NaCl 0.9%) are aerosolized via nebulizer in the pleural cavity. Vital signs and nebulization are remote-controlled. After 30 min, the remaining toxic aerosol is exhausted using a closed surgical smoke evacuation system. A 24Fr chest tube is inserted in postero-apical position with continuous negative pressure of 20 cm H<sub>2</sub>O. When needed, PITAC may be repeated every six weeks in alternate with systemic chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our hands, the technique above has shown to be feasible and safe.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Further studies are needed to assess the potential symptomatic and oncological benefits of PITAC in MPE.</p>","PeriodicalId":20231,"journal":{"name":"Pleura and Peritoneum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2020-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/pp-2020-0129","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25363729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-11-02eCollection Date: 2020-11-01DOI: 10.1515/pp-2020-0131
Avinash Aujayeb, Karl Jackson
Objectives: Local anesthetic medical thoracoscopy (LAT) is a well-established diagnostic, therapeutic, and preventative intervention in undiagnosed pleural effusions with a high diagnostic sensitivity and low complication rates. There is a large variability in practice. We describe a nine-year experience in a large district general hospital in England.
Methods: Two hundred seventy-five patients had LAT between January 2010 and December 2018. Data on outcomes and complications were obtained from the patients' notes, electronic records, laboratory, and radiographic findings.
Results: The main diagnoses were malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) (n=110, 40%), chronic inflammation/fibrinous pleuritis (77, 28%), lung cancer (26, 9.5%), and breast cancer (16, 6%). LAT failed to diagnose cancer in 7/275 patients (false-negative rate 2.5%, diagnostic sensitivity 97.5%). Out of the 105 patients with chronic inflammation/fibrinous pleuritis or atypical proliferative processes, 21 (20%) were subsequently diagnosed with malignancy. Talcum pleurodesis was performed in 146 patients, and was successful in 86%. Seventy eight (28%) patients had trapped lung; 27 of those had a repeat procedure. The median length of stay was 3.96 days. There was one hospital death (0.3% mortality). Complications of LAT included pleural (3, 1%) and wound infections (4, 1.4%), persistent air leaks (9, 3.2%), subcutaneous emphysema (10, 3.6%), and tumor extension to the access port (1, 0.3%).
Conclusions: In this cohort, LAT was safe, effective, and enabled high diagnostic sensitivity. Further areas of study include optimal sedation and anesthetic pathways and combining LAT with indwelling pleural catheters (IPC).
{"title":"A review of the outcomes of rigid medical thoracoscopy in a large UK district general hospital.","authors":"Avinash Aujayeb, Karl Jackson","doi":"10.1515/pp-2020-0131","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2020-0131","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Local anesthetic medical thoracoscopy (LAT) is a well-established diagnostic, therapeutic, and preventative intervention in undiagnosed pleural effusions with a high diagnostic sensitivity and low complication rates. There is a large variability in practice. We describe a nine-year experience in a large district general hospital in England.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two hundred seventy-five patients had LAT between January 2010 and December 2018. Data on outcomes and complications were obtained from the patients' notes, electronic records, laboratory, and radiographic findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The main diagnoses were malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) (n=110, 40%), chronic inflammation/fibrinous pleuritis (77, 28%), lung cancer (26, 9.5%), and breast cancer (16, 6%). LAT failed to diagnose cancer in 7/275 patients (false-negative rate 2.5%, diagnostic sensitivity 97.5%). Out of the 105 patients with chronic inflammation/fibrinous pleuritis or atypical proliferative processes, 21 (20%) were subsequently diagnosed with malignancy. Talcum pleurodesis was performed in 146 patients, and was successful in 86%. Seventy eight (28%) patients had trapped lung; 27 of those had a repeat procedure. The median length of stay was 3.96 days. There was one hospital death (0.3% mortality). Complications of LAT included pleural (3, 1%) and wound infections (4, 1.4%), persistent air leaks (9, 3.2%), subcutaneous emphysema (10, 3.6%), and tumor extension to the access port (1, 0.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this cohort, LAT was safe, effective, and enabled high diagnostic sensitivity. Further areas of study include optimal sedation and anesthetic pathways and combining LAT with indwelling pleural catheters (IPC).</p>","PeriodicalId":20231,"journal":{"name":"Pleura and Peritoneum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2020-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/pp-2020-0131","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25363730","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-11-02eCollection Date: 2020-11-01DOI: 10.1515/pp-2020-0114
Irina A Shurygina, Мichael G Shurygin, Lubov V Rodionova, Nataliya I Ayushinova
Objectives: To study the expression of growth factors in the regulation of tissue repair after peritoneal damage tissue response to peritoneal damage.
Methods: Experimental study in 35 male Wistar rats determining the evolution over time of the tissue response to aseptic peritoneal damage. A standardized bowel and peritoneal lesions were created in the right lower quadrant by laparotomy. Then, tissular expression of growth factors was evaluated by multiplex polymerase chain reaction at seven timepoints between 6 h and 30 days, postoperatively.
Results: Tissular responses of granulocyte-stimulating factors (Csf2, Csf3), connective tissue growth factor (Ctgf), epidermal growth factors and receptor (Egf, Egfr), fibroblast growth factors (Fgf2, 7 and 10), heparin binding EGF-like growth factor (Hbegf), hepatocyte growth factor (Hgf), insulin-like growth factor-1 (Igf1), mitogenic transforming growth factors (Tgfa, Tgfb1, Tgfbr3), and vascular endothelial growth factor A (Vegfa) were biphasic with a first expression peak at day 3, followed by a more pronounced peak at day 14.
Conclusions: We observed a long-lasting, widespread response of tissular growth factors for at least two weeks after peritoneal damage. To be clinically effective, the prophylaxis of postoperative adhesions might be needed for an extended period of time.
{"title":"Growth factors in the regulation of reparative response in the presence of peritoneal damage.","authors":"Irina A Shurygina, Мichael G Shurygin, Lubov V Rodionova, Nataliya I Ayushinova","doi":"10.1515/pp-2020-0114","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2020-0114","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To study the expression of growth factors in the regulation of tissue repair after peritoneal damage tissue response to peritoneal damage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Experimental study in 35 male Wistar rats determining the evolution over time of the tissue response to aseptic peritoneal damage. A standardized bowel and peritoneal lesions were created in the right lower quadrant by laparotomy. Then, tissular expression of growth factors was evaluated by multiplex polymerase chain reaction at seven timepoints between 6 h and 30 days, postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Tissular responses of granulocyte-stimulating factors (Csf2, Csf3), connective tissue growth factor (Ctgf), epidermal growth factors and receptor (Egf, Egfr), fibroblast growth factors (Fgf2, 7 and 10), heparin binding EGF-like growth factor (Hbegf), hepatocyte growth factor (Hgf), insulin-like growth factor-1 (Igf1), mitogenic transforming growth factors (Tgfa, Tgfb1, Tgfbr3), and vascular endothelial growth factor A (Vegfa) were biphasic with a first expression peak at day 3, followed by a more pronounced peak at day 14.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We observed a long-lasting, widespread response of tissular growth factors for at least two weeks after peritoneal damage. To be clinically effective, the prophylaxis of postoperative adhesions might be needed for an extended period of time.</p>","PeriodicalId":20231,"journal":{"name":"Pleura and Peritoneum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2020-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/pp-2020-0114","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25363728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objectives: Carboplatin is frequently used in various doses for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) although its pharmacokinetics, including focus on the perfusion time, has not been evaluated when used in modern era cytoreductive surgery (CRS). The aim was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and hematological toxicity of carboplatin used for HIPEC with a perfusion time of 90 min.
Methods: Fifteen patients with stage III-IV primary EOC received CRS and 90 min of HIPEC with carboplatin at dose 800 mg/m2. For the pharmacokinetic analysis, perfusate and blood samples were obtained during HIPEC and up to 48 h after HIPEC (blood only). Hematological toxicity within 30 days was graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Severe toxicity (grades 3-5) is reported.
Results: Mean maximum concentration of carboplatin was 12 times higher in perfusate than plasma (mean CmaxPF=348 µg/mL (range: 279-595 µg/mL) versus mean CmaxPL=29 µg/mL (range: 21-39 µg/mL)). Mean terminal half-life of carboplatin in perfusate was 104 min (range: 63-190 min) and mean intraperitoneal-to-plasma area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) ratio was 12.3 (range: 7.4-17.2). Two patients (13%) had grade 3 neutropenia within 30 days. No grade 4-5 hematological toxicities were identified.
Conclusions: Carboplatin has a favorable pharmacokinetic profile for 90 min HIPEC administration, and the hematological toxicity was acceptable at dose 800 mg/m2. Large interindividual differences were found in the pharmacokinetic parameters, making risk of systemic exposure difficult to predict.
{"title":"Pharmacokinetics and toxicity of carboplatin used for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer.","authors":"Mette Schou Mikkelsen, Jan Blaakaer, Lone Kjeld Petersen, Luise Gram Schleiss, Lene Hjerrild Iversen","doi":"10.1515/pp-2020-0137","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2020-0137","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Carboplatin is frequently used in various doses for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) although its pharmacokinetics, including focus on the perfusion time, has not been evaluated when used in modern era cytoreductive surgery (CRS). The aim was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and hematological toxicity of carboplatin used for HIPEC with a perfusion time of 90 min.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen patients with stage III-IV primary EOC received CRS and 90 min of HIPEC with carboplatin at dose 800 mg/m<sup>2</sup>. For the pharmacokinetic analysis, perfusate and blood samples were obtained during HIPEC and up to 48 h after HIPEC (blood only). Hematological toxicity within 30 days was graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Severe toxicity (grades 3-5) is reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean maximum concentration of carboplatin was 12 times higher in perfusate than plasma (mean CmaxPF=348 µg/mL (range: 279-595 µg/mL) versus mean CmaxPL=29 µg/mL (range: 21-39 µg/mL)). Mean terminal half-life of carboplatin in perfusate was 104 min (range: 63-190 min) and mean intraperitoneal-to-plasma area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) ratio was 12.3 (range: 7.4-17.2). Two patients (13%) had grade 3 neutropenia within 30 days. No grade 4-5 hematological toxicities were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Carboplatin has a favorable pharmacokinetic profile for 90 min HIPEC administration, and the hematological toxicity was acceptable at dose 800 mg/m<sup>2</sup>. Large interindividual differences were found in the pharmacokinetic parameters, making risk of systemic exposure difficult to predict.</p>","PeriodicalId":20231,"journal":{"name":"Pleura and Peritoneum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2020-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/pp-2020-0137","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25363731","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-08-31eCollection Date: 2020-09-01DOI: 10.1515/pp-2020-0120
Sampige Prasanna Somashekhar, Kumar C Rohit, S V S Deo, Kyatsandra Rajagopal Ashwin
Objectives: Perception of cytoreductive surgery (CRS), hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), and pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for treating peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM) differ widely among physicians.
Methods: This on-site survey performed during a major oncology congress in 2019 evaluated the current opinion, perceptions, knowledge and practice of HIPEC and PIPAC among oncologists in India.
Results: There were 147 respondents (gynecologists (30%), surgical oncologists and gastrointestinal surgeons (64%), and medical oncologists (6%)). Whereas most respondents considered CRS and HIPEC an appropriate therapeutic option, 25% would not recommend CRS and HIPEC. The main barriers to referral to an expert center were inaccessibility to such a center (37.8%), non-inclusion of CRS and HIPEC in clinical practice guidelines (32.4%), and a high morbidity/mortality (21.6%). Variations were found in the various practice patterns of CRS/HIPEC like eligibility criteria, HIPEC protocols and safety measures. Although PIPAC awareness as a novel therapeutic option was high, only a limited number of centers offered PIPAC, mainly because of non-access to technology and missing training opportunities (76.2%).
Conclusions: Lack of widespread acceptance, poor accessibility and low utilization presents a significant challenge for HIPEC and PIPAC in India. There is a need to raise the awareness of curative and palliative therapeutic options for PSM. This might be achieved by the creation of expert centers, specialized training curricula and of a new sub-speciality in oncology.
{"title":"Practice patterns, attitudes, and knowledge among clinicians regarding hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy and pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy: a national survey by Indian society of peritoneal surface malignancies (ISPSM).","authors":"Sampige Prasanna Somashekhar, Kumar C Rohit, S V S Deo, Kyatsandra Rajagopal Ashwin","doi":"10.1515/pp-2020-0120","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2020-0120","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Perception of cytoreductive surgery (CRS), hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), and pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for treating peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM) differ widely among physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This on-site survey performed during a major oncology congress in 2019 evaluated the current opinion, perceptions, knowledge and practice of HIPEC and PIPAC among oncologists in India.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 147 respondents (gynecologists (30%), surgical oncologists and gastrointestinal surgeons (64%), and medical oncologists (6%)). Whereas most respondents considered CRS and HIPEC an appropriate therapeutic option, 25% would not recommend CRS and HIPEC. The main barriers to referral to an expert center were inaccessibility to such a center (37.8%), non-inclusion of CRS and HIPEC in clinical practice guidelines (32.4%), and a high morbidity/mortality (21.6%). Variations were found in the various practice patterns of CRS/HIPEC like eligibility criteria, HIPEC protocols and safety measures. Although PIPAC awareness as a novel therapeutic option was high, only a limited number of centers offered PIPAC, mainly because of non-access to technology and missing training opportunities (76.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lack of widespread acceptance, poor accessibility and low utilization presents a significant challenge for HIPEC and PIPAC in India. There is a need to raise the awareness of curative and palliative therapeutic options for PSM. This might be achieved by the creation of expert centers, specialized training curricula and of a new sub-speciality in oncology.</p>","PeriodicalId":20231,"journal":{"name":"Pleura and Peritoneum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2020-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/pp-2020-0120","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38752204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-08-27eCollection Date: 2020-09-01DOI: 10.1515/pp-2020-0126
Sohan Lal Solanki, Mrida A K Jhingan, Avanish P Saklani
Objectives: Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) for peritoneal malignancies are complex surgeries marked with hemodynamic perturbations, temperature fluctuations, blood loss and metabolic disturbances in the intra-operative and post-operative period. In this report, we highlighted perioperative factors which may have led to cardiac arrest in immediate postoperative period and subsequent successful resuscitation in two patients with high volume peritoneal cancers who underwent CRS-HIPEC.
Case presentation: Both patients had a similar clinical course, characterized by massive blood and fluid loss, metabolic derangement, hemodynamic instability, long duration of surgery, post HIPEC rebound hypothermia and hypokalemia which need to be anticipated.
Conclusions: We reviewed the literature related to postoperative hypothermia and other major complications after CRS-HIPEC and correlated the available literature with our findings.
{"title":"Rebound hypothermia after cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) and cardiac arrest in immediate postoperative period: a report of two cases and review of literature.","authors":"Sohan Lal Solanki, Mrida A K Jhingan, Avanish P Saklani","doi":"10.1515/pp-2020-0126","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2020-0126","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) for peritoneal malignancies are complex surgeries marked with hemodynamic perturbations, temperature fluctuations, blood loss and metabolic disturbances in the intra-operative and post-operative period. In this report, we highlighted perioperative factors which may have led to cardiac arrest in immediate postoperative period and subsequent successful resuscitation in two patients with high volume peritoneal cancers who underwent CRS-HIPEC.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>Both patients had a similar clinical course, characterized by massive blood and fluid loss, metabolic derangement, hemodynamic instability, long duration of surgery, post HIPEC rebound hypothermia and hypokalemia which need to be anticipated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We reviewed the literature related to postoperative hypothermia and other major complications after CRS-HIPEC and correlated the available literature with our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":20231,"journal":{"name":"Pleura and Peritoneum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2020-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/pp-2020-0126","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38752205","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-08-25eCollection Date: 2020-09-01DOI: 10.1515/pp-2020-0132
Antonio Macrì, Giorgio Badessi, Carmelo Mazzeo, Marica Galati, Eugenio Cucinotta, Vincenzo Rizzo
Objectives: Pelvic peritonectomy can induce anorectal and urogenital dysfunctions. To reduce this type of complications during the procedure, we propose to use intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM).
Content: Stimulation with a bipolar probe allows the identification of the obturator and ilioinguinal and pudendal nerves. At the end of the cytoreductive surgery, the motor and somatosensory evoked potentials must be evaluated to confirm the preservation of pelvic innervation.
Summary: The use of IONM during pelvic peritonectomy is technically feasible, and it can help to preserve pelvic nerves.
Outlook: Obviously, its definitive value remains to be elucidated.
{"title":"Technique of neuromonitoring during pelvic peritonectomy.","authors":"Antonio Macrì, Giorgio Badessi, Carmelo Mazzeo, Marica Galati, Eugenio Cucinotta, Vincenzo Rizzo","doi":"10.1515/pp-2020-0132","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2020-0132","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Pelvic peritonectomy can induce anorectal and urogenital dysfunctions. To reduce this type of complications during the procedure, we propose to use intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM).</p><p><strong>Content: </strong>Stimulation with a bipolar probe allows the identification of the obturator and ilioinguinal and pudendal nerves. At the end of the cytoreductive surgery, the motor and somatosensory evoked potentials must be evaluated to confirm the preservation of pelvic innervation.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The use of IONM during pelvic peritonectomy is technically feasible, and it can help to preserve pelvic nerves.</p><p><strong>Outlook: </strong>Obviously, its definitive value remains to be elucidated.</p>","PeriodicalId":20231,"journal":{"name":"Pleura and Peritoneum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2020-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/pp-2020-0132","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39087844","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-08-20eCollection Date: 2020-09-01DOI: 10.1515/pp-2020-0119
Dahbia Djelil, Anthony Dohan, Marc Pocard
A41-year-oldwomanwas referredbecauseof abdominalpain, reporting on an appendectomy 24 years ago. At that time, she developed a postoperative intra-abdominal abscess and was told that the tip of the appendix had been left in the abdomen. Seventeenyears later, aCT-scan showeda6cmcystic tumorat the caecum base (Figure 1A). The treatment was conservative. The abdominal CT-scan now showed a 15 cm large tumor (Figure 1B). A low-grade pseudomyxomaperitonei (PMP)with a Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) of 6/39 was diagnosed. A 59-year-old man presented with abdominal pain nine years after a laparoscopic appendectomy. He reported on an intra-abdominal abscess eight months postoperatively, requiring radiological drainage. A low-grade PMP (PCI 12) was diagnosed, andanappendix tip remnant identified (Figure 1C). A PMP can arise from an appendiceal tip remnant. A history of appendectomy does not exclude an appendiceal origin of PMP.
{"title":"Peritoneal pseudomyxoma after incomplete appendectomy.","authors":"Dahbia Djelil, Anthony Dohan, Marc Pocard","doi":"10.1515/pp-2020-0119","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2020-0119","url":null,"abstract":"A41-year-oldwomanwas referredbecauseof abdominalpain, reporting on an appendectomy 24 years ago. At that time, she developed a postoperative intra-abdominal abscess and was told that the tip of the appendix had been left in the abdomen. Seventeenyears later, aCT-scan showeda6cmcystic tumorat the caecum base (Figure 1A). The treatment was conservative. The abdominal CT-scan now showed a 15 cm large tumor (Figure 1B). A low-grade pseudomyxomaperitonei (PMP)with a Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) of 6/39 was diagnosed. A 59-year-old man presented with abdominal pain nine years after a laparoscopic appendectomy. He reported on an intra-abdominal abscess eight months postoperatively, requiring radiological drainage. A low-grade PMP (PCI 12) was diagnosed, andanappendix tip remnant identified (Figure 1C). A PMP can arise from an appendiceal tip remnant. A history of appendectomy does not exclude an appendiceal origin of PMP.","PeriodicalId":20231,"journal":{"name":"Pleura and Peritoneum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2020-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/pp-2020-0119","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38752203","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-08-04eCollection Date: 2020-09-01DOI: 10.1515/pp-2020-0103
S P Somashekhar, Y Ramya, K R Ashwin, S Z Shabber, V K Ahuja, R Amit, K C Rohit
Obejectives: Optimal cytoreductive surgery (CRS), followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, is a major predictor of oncological outcome in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC). It is not clear if a delayed start of adjuvant chemotherapy negatively impacts on the oncological outcome.
Methods: Prospective registry study on 75 patients treated with CRS and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Adjuvant chemotherapy was started within 42 days in 41 patients (55%), later on in 34 patients (45%). Multivariate analyses of preoperative factors were done on survival outcome. Outcomes were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).
Results: There was no difference in RFS after early introduction (median 35 months) vs. late introduction of chemotherapy (median 32 months), p = 0.17. Median OS in patients with late introduction of chemotherapy was 46 months and was not yet reached in early introduction group.
Conclusions: In this exploratory study in a small group of women with advanced EOC, starting adjuvant chemotherapy more than 6 weeks after CRS and HIPEC did not deteriorate significantly RFS or OS. Well-designed clinical studies are still needed to evaluate the interplay of HIPEC and the point of time of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in this indication.
{"title":"Evaluation of delay in time to adjuvant chemotherapy after HIPEC and its impact on oncological outcome in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.","authors":"S P Somashekhar, Y Ramya, K R Ashwin, S Z Shabber, V K Ahuja, R Amit, K C Rohit","doi":"10.1515/pp-2020-0103","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2020-0103","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Obejectives: </strong>Optimal cytoreductive surgery (CRS), followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, is a major predictor of oncological outcome in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC). It is not clear if a delayed start of adjuvant chemotherapy negatively impacts on the oncological outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective registry study on 75 patients treated with CRS and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Adjuvant chemotherapy was started within 42 days in 41 patients (55%), later on in 34 patients (45%). Multivariate analyses of preoperative factors were done on survival outcome. Outcomes were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no difference in RFS after early introduction (median 35 months) vs. late introduction of chemotherapy (median 32 months), p = 0.17. Median OS in patients with late introduction of chemotherapy was 46 months and was not yet reached in early introduction group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this exploratory study in a small group of women with advanced EOC, starting adjuvant chemotherapy more than 6 weeks after CRS and HIPEC did not deteriorate significantly RFS or OS. Well-designed clinical studies are still needed to evaluate the interplay of HIPEC and the point of time of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in this indication.</p>","PeriodicalId":20231,"journal":{"name":"Pleura and Peritoneum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2020-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/pp-2020-0103","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38752201","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}