首页 > 最新文献

Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics最新文献

英文 中文
What is mental pain? A systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative research on the lived experience of mental pain. 什么是精神痛苦?精神痛苦生活经验定性研究的系统回顾与综合。
IF 22.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-09-29 DOI: 10.1159/000548567
Samy Kozlowitz,Alexandre Ribeiro,Jordan Sibeoni,Baptiste Brossard,Astrid Chevance
INTRODUCTIONMental pain-a pain not primarily felt in the body-is a predictor of suicide and is often described as one of the most distressing aspects of depression. However, the absence of a clear definition hampers both research and clinical practice. This metasynthesis aims to characterize the lived experience of mental pain to inform the future development of a definition.METHODSWe conducted a systematic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Web of Science to identify qualitative studies reporting first-person accounts of mental pain. Thematic synthesis was used to generate descriptive and analytical themes, drawing on semantic, clinical, and phenomenological insights. The quality of the primary studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP), and the Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (GRADE-CERQual) approach was applied to evaluate the findings.RESULTSThe metasynthesis included 49 qualitative studies with 1,467 participants and led to the development of 22 themes and 85 subthemes. Mental pain was defined by five phenomenal features: unpleasant, immediate, identity-disrupting, invisible, and often perceived as worse than physical pain. It is also accompanied by unspecific psychological and physical manifestations. The emergence of mental pain can be conceptualized as a signal of a threatened sense of self in response to bodily, psychological, existential, or social adversity. Confidence in the findings was moderate due to methodological and reporting limitations.CONCLUSIONA clearer understanding of mental pain may enhance clinical practice by helping clinicians better identify, understand, and respond to this form of suffering.
精神上的痛苦——一种主要不是在身体上感受到的痛苦——是自杀的前兆,通常被描述为抑郁症最令人痛苦的方面之一。然而,缺乏明确的定义阻碍了研究和临床实践。这种元合成的目的是表征精神痛苦的生活经验,以告知未来发展的定义。方法我们在MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL和Web of Science中进行了系统的检索,以确定报告第一人称精神疼痛的定性研究。主题综合用于生成描述性和分析性主题,利用语义,临床和现象学的见解。使用关键评估技能计划(CASP)评估初步研究的质量,并使用定性研究综述证据的置信度(GRADE-CERQual)方法评估研究结果。结果荟萃共纳入49项定性研究,共1467名受试者,共开发了22个主题和85个副主题。精神上的痛苦被定义为五个显著特征:令人不快的、即时的、扰乱身份的、无形的,并且通常被认为比身体上的痛苦更糟糕。它还伴有非特异性的心理和生理表现。精神疼痛的出现可以被概念化为对身体、心理、存在或社会逆境的自我威胁感的反应。由于方法和报告的限制,研究结果的可信度不高。结论对精神疼痛的认识可以帮助临床医生更好地识别、理解和应对这种形式的痛苦,从而提高临床实践水平。
{"title":"What is mental pain? A systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative research on the lived experience of mental pain.","authors":"Samy Kozlowitz,Alexandre Ribeiro,Jordan Sibeoni,Baptiste Brossard,Astrid Chevance","doi":"10.1159/000548567","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548567","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTIONMental pain-a pain not primarily felt in the body-is a predictor of suicide and is often described as one of the most distressing aspects of depression. However, the absence of a clear definition hampers both research and clinical practice. This metasynthesis aims to characterize the lived experience of mental pain to inform the future development of a definition.METHODSWe conducted a systematic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Web of Science to identify qualitative studies reporting first-person accounts of mental pain. Thematic synthesis was used to generate descriptive and analytical themes, drawing on semantic, clinical, and phenomenological insights. The quality of the primary studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP), and the Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (GRADE-CERQual) approach was applied to evaluate the findings.RESULTSThe metasynthesis included 49 qualitative studies with 1,467 participants and led to the development of 22 themes and 85 subthemes. Mental pain was defined by five phenomenal features: unpleasant, immediate, identity-disrupting, invisible, and often perceived as worse than physical pain. It is also accompanied by unspecific psychological and physical manifestations. The emergence of mental pain can be conceptualized as a signal of a threatened sense of self in response to bodily, psychological, existential, or social adversity. Confidence in the findings was moderate due to methodological and reporting limitations.CONCLUSIONA clearer understanding of mental pain may enhance clinical practice by helping clinicians better identify, understand, and respond to this form of suffering.","PeriodicalId":20744,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","volume":"103 1","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":22.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145189492","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Menstrual Cycle Dynamics in Mental Health Demand new Approaches in Psychotherapy and Digital Health. 心理健康中的月经周期动态需要心理治疗和数字健康的新方法。
IF 22.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-09-18 DOI: 10.1159/000548508
Sibel Nayman,Inga Niedtfeld,Bernd Lenz,Alexander Karabatsiakis,Christian Schmahl,Christine Kuehner
{"title":"Menstrual Cycle Dynamics in Mental Health Demand new Approaches in Psychotherapy and Digital Health.","authors":"Sibel Nayman,Inga Niedtfeld,Bernd Lenz,Alexander Karabatsiakis,Christian Schmahl,Christine Kuehner","doi":"10.1159/000548508","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548508","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20744,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","volume":"56 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":22.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145083512","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Suicide and Self-harm: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. 接受与承诺治疗对自杀与自残的疗效:系统回顾与元分析。
IF 22.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-09-14 DOI: 10.1159/000548398
Tao Zhang,Bryant Pui Hung Hui,Ducasse Ducasse,Ying Li,Yongyi Wang,Jiawei Hu,Willie Tang Chung Tang,Yingzi Ke
INTRODUCTIONSelf-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITBs) are major public health issues worldwide. In recent years, there has been a growing body of research investigating the application of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for SITBs. This study systematically reviews and meta-analyzes the effectiveness of ACT in reducing SITBs.METHODSWe systematically searched six databases and examined the reference lists of relevant studies. Studies that explored the effectiveness of ACT versus control conditions for reducing SITBs were included. Effect sizes were calculated using Hedges' g with the random effect model. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were also performed.RESULTSA total of 48 studies (N = 4,719) were included in this review. The results indicated that ACT outperformed control conditions in alleviating suicide ideation (g = -0.64), suicide attempt (g = -0.66), self-harm (g = -1.53), non-suicidal self-injury (g = -0.59), and overall SITBs (g = -0.99) at post-treatment. Also, ACT was effective in reducing suicide ideation (g = -2.15), non-suicidal self-injury (g = -1.18), and overall SITBs (g = -1.52) at follow-up. Moderator analyses revealed that ACT was more successful in mitigating suicide ideation when delivered in a group format or in Eastern countries. Similarly, studies conducted in Eastern countries, or those employing direct interventions, reported greater efficacy in addressing overall SITBs.CONCLUSIONThis review highlights the effectiveness of ACT in reducing SITBs and suggests that it may serve as a promising alternative strategy to standard treatment for SITBs. More high-quality and large-scale randomized controlled trials are required to substantiate our findings.
自残思想和行为(sitb)是世界范围内主要的公共卫生问题。近年来,有越来越多的研究探讨了接受和承诺疗法(ACT)在sitb中的应用。本研究系统回顾和荟萃分析了ACT在减少sitb方面的有效性。方法系统检索6个数据库,查阅相关文献。研究探讨了ACT与对照条件在减少sitb方面的有效性。使用随机效应模型的Hedges' g计算效应量。还进行了亚组分析和meta回归。结果本综述共纳入48项研究(N = 4719)。结果表明,ACT治疗后在减轻自杀意念(g = -0.64)、自杀企图(g = -0.66)、自我伤害(g = -1.53)、非自杀性自我伤害(g = -0.59)和总体sitb (g = -0.99)方面优于对照组。此外,ACT在减少自杀意念(g = -2.15)、非自杀性自伤(g = -1.18)和总体sitb (g = -1.52)方面也有效。主持人分析显示,当以小组形式或在东方国家进行时,ACT在减轻自杀意念方面更成功。同样,在东方国家进行的研究,或采用直接干预措施的研究,报告在解决总体sitb方面更有效。结论:本综述强调了ACT在减少sitb方面的有效性,并表明它可能是sitb标准治疗的一种有希望的替代策略。需要更多高质量和大规模的随机对照试验来证实我们的发现。
{"title":"Efficacy of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Suicide and Self-harm: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Tao Zhang,Bryant Pui Hung Hui,Ducasse Ducasse,Ying Li,Yongyi Wang,Jiawei Hu,Willie Tang Chung Tang,Yingzi Ke","doi":"10.1159/000548398","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548398","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTIONSelf-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITBs) are major public health issues worldwide. In recent years, there has been a growing body of research investigating the application of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for SITBs. This study systematically reviews and meta-analyzes the effectiveness of ACT in reducing SITBs.METHODSWe systematically searched six databases and examined the reference lists of relevant studies. Studies that explored the effectiveness of ACT versus control conditions for reducing SITBs were included. Effect sizes were calculated using Hedges' g with the random effect model. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were also performed.RESULTSA total of 48 studies (N = 4,719) were included in this review. The results indicated that ACT outperformed control conditions in alleviating suicide ideation (g = -0.64), suicide attempt (g = -0.66), self-harm (g = -1.53), non-suicidal self-injury (g = -0.59), and overall SITBs (g = -0.99) at post-treatment. Also, ACT was effective in reducing suicide ideation (g = -2.15), non-suicidal self-injury (g = -1.18), and overall SITBs (g = -1.52) at follow-up. Moderator analyses revealed that ACT was more successful in mitigating suicide ideation when delivered in a group format or in Eastern countries. Similarly, studies conducted in Eastern countries, or those employing direct interventions, reported greater efficacy in addressing overall SITBs.CONCLUSIONThis review highlights the effectiveness of ACT in reducing SITBs and suggests that it may serve as a promising alternative strategy to standard treatment for SITBs. More high-quality and large-scale randomized controlled trials are required to substantiate our findings.","PeriodicalId":20744,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","volume":"68 1","pages":"1-28"},"PeriodicalIF":22.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145058951","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
INTEGRATIVE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW ON PHARMACOLOGICAL, PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC AND NEUROSTIMULATORY TREATMENT OPTIONS IN TREATMENT-RESISTANT ANXIETY DISORDERS. 难治性焦虑障碍的药理学、心理治疗和神经刺激治疗方案的综合系统评价。
IF 22.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-09-14 DOI: 10.1159/000547926
Miriam A Schiele,Harry A Fagan,David S Baldwin,Katharina Domschke
Treatment resistance in anxiety disorders (TR-AD) constitutes a major clinical challenge conferring a considerable burden regarding quality of life and societal health costs. This systematic review provides an overview of pharmacological, psychotherapeutic and neurostimulatory treatment options in adults with treatment-resistant generalized anxiety disorder (TR-GAD), panic disorder (TR-PD) / agoraphobia and social anxiety disorder (TR-SAD). A total of 26 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 36 open label studies were identified, with, however, mostly small sample sizes and several methodological limitations. According to RCTs, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) or clomipramine are effective in TR-PD after failure to respond to cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). In pharmacological TR-SAD, switching from one SSRI to another or to venlafaxine was found helpful in open label trials. RCTs further suggest augmentation with quetiapine, risperidone, olanzapine or pregabalin in TR-GAD, pindolol in TR-PD and clonazepam in TR-SAD. Open label studies in TR-AD provide preliminary evidence for ketamine or augmentation with nefazodone, reboxetine, buspirone, aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, ziprasidone, divalproex sodium, levetiracetam, zonisamide, flumazenil, pregabalin, cannabidiol and acamprosate. For pharmacological TR, CBT was effective in several RCTs. Following non-response to CBT, first evidence suggests effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy. Only inconclusive support was identified for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in TR-AD. In summary, this integrative review may provide an evidence base for expert recommendations, inform clinical guidelines, and inspire further research into innovative, personalized treatment of TR-AD increasing response rates and lowering the considerable individual and public health burden of anxiety disorders.
焦虑障碍(TR-AD)的治疗耐药性构成了一项重大的临床挑战,给生活质量和社会健康成本带来了相当大的负担。本系统综述了成人难治性广泛性焦虑障碍(TR-GAD)、惊恐障碍(TR-PD) /广场恐怖症和社交焦虑障碍(TR-SAD)的药理学、心理治疗和神经刺激治疗方案。共有26项随机对照试验(RCTs)和36项开放标签研究被确定,然而,大多数样本量小,并且有一些方法学上的局限性。根据随机对照试验,选择性5 -羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)或氯丙咪嗪对认知行为治疗(CBT)无效的TR-PD有效。在药理学TR-SAD中,在开放标签试验中,从一种SSRI切换到另一种SSRI或文拉法辛是有帮助的。随机对照试验进一步表明,在TR-GAD中增加喹硫平、利培酮、奥氮平或普瑞巴林,在TR-PD中增加品多洛尔,在TR-SAD中增加氯硝西泮。dr - ad的公开标签研究提供了氯胺酮或与奈法唑酮、瑞波西汀、丁螺环酮、阿立哌唑、奥氮平、喹硫平、利培酮、齐拉西酮、双丙戊酸钠、左乙拉西坦、唑尼沙胺、氟马西尼、普瑞巴林、大麻二酚和阿坎普罗酸增加的初步证据。对于药理学TR, CBT在几个随机对照试验中是有效的。在对CBT无反应之后,第一个证据表明接受和承诺疗法和基于正念的认知疗法是有效的。只有不确定的证据支持重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗TR-AD。总之,这项综合评价可能为专家建议提供证据基础,为临床指南提供信息,并启发进一步研究TR-AD的创新、个性化治疗,以提高反应率,降低焦虑障碍的个人和公共卫生负担。
{"title":"INTEGRATIVE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW ON PHARMACOLOGICAL, PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC AND NEUROSTIMULATORY TREATMENT OPTIONS IN TREATMENT-RESISTANT ANXIETY DISORDERS.","authors":"Miriam A Schiele,Harry A Fagan,David S Baldwin,Katharina Domschke","doi":"10.1159/000547926","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547926","url":null,"abstract":"Treatment resistance in anxiety disorders (TR-AD) constitutes a major clinical challenge conferring a considerable burden regarding quality of life and societal health costs. This systematic review provides an overview of pharmacological, psychotherapeutic and neurostimulatory treatment options in adults with treatment-resistant generalized anxiety disorder (TR-GAD), panic disorder (TR-PD) / agoraphobia and social anxiety disorder (TR-SAD). A total of 26 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 36 open label studies were identified, with, however, mostly small sample sizes and several methodological limitations. According to RCTs, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) or clomipramine are effective in TR-PD after failure to respond to cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). In pharmacological TR-SAD, switching from one SSRI to another or to venlafaxine was found helpful in open label trials. RCTs further suggest augmentation with quetiapine, risperidone, olanzapine or pregabalin in TR-GAD, pindolol in TR-PD and clonazepam in TR-SAD. Open label studies in TR-AD provide preliminary evidence for ketamine or augmentation with nefazodone, reboxetine, buspirone, aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, ziprasidone, divalproex sodium, levetiracetam, zonisamide, flumazenil, pregabalin, cannabidiol and acamprosate. For pharmacological TR, CBT was effective in several RCTs. Following non-response to CBT, first evidence suggests effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy. Only inconclusive support was identified for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in TR-AD. In summary, this integrative review may provide an evidence base for expert recommendations, inform clinical guidelines, and inspire further research into innovative, personalized treatment of TR-AD increasing response rates and lowering the considerable individual and public health burden of anxiety disorders.","PeriodicalId":20744,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","volume":"16 1","pages":"1-43"},"PeriodicalIF":22.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145058952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Perceived Chronic Stress prior to SARS-CoV-2 Infection Predicts Ongoing Symptomatic COVID-19: A Prospective Cohort Study. SARS-CoV-2感染前的慢性应激可预测持续的症状性COVID-19:一项前瞻性队列研究
IF 22.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-09-09 DOI: 10.1159/000547858
Christian Fazekas,Nandu Goswami,Franziska Matzer,Alexander Avian,Julia Lodron,Marc Rijksen,Barbara Hanfstingl,Voyko Kavcic,Andrea Groselj-Strele,Harald Sourij,Harald H Kessler,Evelyn Stelzl,Clarissa Daniela Voegel,Tina Maria Binz,Karin Schmid-Zalaudek,Alexander Wittmann,Stefan Pilz
INTRODUCTIONUnderstanding chronic stress as a potential risk factor for COVID-19 progression could inform public health measures and personalized preventive interventions. Therefore, we investigated the influence of chronic stress prior to SARS-CoV-2 infection on symptom persistence 1 month after COVID-19 onset.METHODSThe participants of this prospective cohort study named "StressLoC" were adults with COVID-19 who had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection within the last 7 days. Pre-existing perceived chronic stress assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) was the primary predictor. The number of stressful life events and hair cortisol concentration served as additional measures of pre-existing chronic stress. The main outcome was examined using the Long COVID Symptom and Impact Tool. It was defined as the presence of any new and impactful COVID-19-related symptom at month 1 after inclusion. Accordingly, participants were assigned to either the ongoing symptomatic COVID-19 group (OSC-G) or control group.RESULTSThe study cohort comprised 288 participants (73.3% female), with a median age of 46 years (IQR 35-56). A total of 210 participants (72.9%) were categorized as OSC-G. Multivariate logistic regression showed that allocation to OSC-G was predicted by perceived chronic stress in the month prior to COVID-19 (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.03-1.14; p = 0.002) and the number of pre-existing symptoms (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.03-1.13; p = 0.001). The number of stressful life events and hair cortisol concentration did not predict OSC-G allocation.CONCLUSIONSResults suggest that higher levels of pre-existing perceived chronic stress increase the odds of developing ongoing symptomatic COVID-19.
了解慢性压力是COVID-19进展的潜在危险因素可以为公共卫生措施和个性化预防干预提供信息。因此,我们研究了SARS-CoV-2感染前的慢性应激对COVID-19发病后1个月症状持续性的影响。方法本前瞻性队列研究“StressLoC”的参与者是在过去7天内检测出SARS-CoV-2感染阳性的COVID-19成年人。以感知压力量表(PSS-10)评估的预先存在的感知慢性压力是主要预测因子。压力生活事件的数量和头发皮质醇浓度作为预先存在的慢性压力的额外测量。使用长COVID症状和影响工具检查主要结果。定义为在纳入后第1个月出现任何新的和有影响的covid -19相关症状。因此,参与者被分配到持续症状的COVID-19组(OSC-G)或对照组。结果研究队列包括288名参与者(73.3%为女性),中位年龄为46岁(IQR 35-56岁)。共有210名参与者(72.9%)被归类为OSC-G。多因素logistic回归显示,COVID-19前一个月的慢性应激感知(OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.03-1.14; p = 0.002)和先前存在的症状数量(OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.03-1.13; p = 0.001)预测了OSC-G的分配。压力生活事件的数量和毛发皮质醇浓度不能预测OSC-G分配。结论:研究结果表明,较高水平的既往感知慢性压力会增加发生持续症状性COVID-19的几率。
{"title":"Perceived Chronic Stress prior to SARS-CoV-2 Infection Predicts Ongoing Symptomatic COVID-19: A Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Christian Fazekas,Nandu Goswami,Franziska Matzer,Alexander Avian,Julia Lodron,Marc Rijksen,Barbara Hanfstingl,Voyko Kavcic,Andrea Groselj-Strele,Harald Sourij,Harald H Kessler,Evelyn Stelzl,Clarissa Daniela Voegel,Tina Maria Binz,Karin Schmid-Zalaudek,Alexander Wittmann,Stefan Pilz","doi":"10.1159/000547858","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547858","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTIONUnderstanding chronic stress as a potential risk factor for COVID-19 progression could inform public health measures and personalized preventive interventions. Therefore, we investigated the influence of chronic stress prior to SARS-CoV-2 infection on symptom persistence 1 month after COVID-19 onset.METHODSThe participants of this prospective cohort study named \"StressLoC\" were adults with COVID-19 who had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection within the last 7 days. Pre-existing perceived chronic stress assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) was the primary predictor. The number of stressful life events and hair cortisol concentration served as additional measures of pre-existing chronic stress. The main outcome was examined using the Long COVID Symptom and Impact Tool. It was defined as the presence of any new and impactful COVID-19-related symptom at month 1 after inclusion. Accordingly, participants were assigned to either the ongoing symptomatic COVID-19 group (OSC-G) or control group.RESULTSThe study cohort comprised 288 participants (73.3% female), with a median age of 46 years (IQR 35-56). A total of 210 participants (72.9%) were categorized as OSC-G. Multivariate logistic regression showed that allocation to OSC-G was predicted by perceived chronic stress in the month prior to COVID-19 (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.03-1.14; p = 0.002) and the number of pre-existing symptoms (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.03-1.13; p = 0.001). The number of stressful life events and hair cortisol concentration did not predict OSC-G allocation.CONCLUSIONSResults suggest that higher levels of pre-existing perceived chronic stress increase the odds of developing ongoing symptomatic COVID-19.","PeriodicalId":20744,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","volume":"138 1","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":22.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145025281","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mortality in people with eating disorders presenting to the health system: A national population-based record linkage study. 向卫生系统报告的饮食失调患者的死亡率:一项基于全国人口的记录联系研究。
IF 22.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-09-04 DOI: 10.1159/000547950
Sarah Maguire,Francisco J Schneuer,Kelly M Dann,Sarah Barakat,Jane Miskovic-Wheatley,Moin Ahmed,Morgan Sidari,Grant Sara,Kristi Griffiths,Ian B Hickie,Janice Russell,Stephen Touyz,Sloane Madden,Claire Diffey,Michelle Roberton,Warren Ward,Amy Hannigan,Michelle Cunich,Natasha Nassar
BACKGROUNDMost previous mortality research in eating disorders involves individuals attending specialist treatment services. Data linkage across jurisdictional health databases at a population level improves the generalisability of findings.AIMSTo investigate mortality risk and causes of death for people with an eating disorder across a large geographic region using administrative health datasets.METHODUsing linked hospital, mental health and death records, a retrospective cohort study was conducted including individuals aged 10-59 years who received an eating disorder diagnosis during hospital-based encounters in Australia, over a 10-year period between 2010 and 2019. A contemporary cohort of people accessing community care only were also evaluated. Mortality rates and standardised morality ratios (SMR) compared to the general population were calculated for each state, and by sex and age groups. Cox regression models were used to assess the risk of sociodemographic characteristics on mortality.RESULTSMortality in people hospitalised with an eating disorder (N=19,697) was more than four times higher than the general population (SMR: 4.54), and highest in people aged 30-39 years (SMR: 13.32). Men hospitalised for eating disorders had a higher risk of death. Mortality rates in anorexia nervosa were not higher than other eating disorder diagnoses. Almost three-quarters of deaths were caused by suicide/self-harm or cardio/respiratory illness.CONCLUSIONSPeople accessing hospital care with eating disorders in Australia have a higher risk of premature death regardless of age, sex or eating disorder diagnosis. Gender and age group disparities can inform policy and resource allocation and support the development of targeted interventions.
背景:之前大多数关于饮食失调的死亡率研究都涉及到接受专业治疗服务的个体。在人口一级跨司法管辖区卫生数据库的数据联系提高了调查结果的普遍性。目的利用行政卫生数据集调查大地理区域饮食失调患者的死亡风险和死亡原因。方法利用相关的医院、心理健康和死亡记录,对2010年至2019年10年期间在澳大利亚医院就诊期间接受饮食失调诊断的10-59岁个体进行了一项回顾性队列研究。同时还对仅接受社区护理的当代人群进行了评估。按性别和年龄组计算了每个州与一般人口相比的死亡率和标准化道德比率。采用Cox回归模型评估社会人口学特征对死亡率的影响。结果饮食失调住院患者的死亡率(N= 19697)是普通人群的4倍多(SMR: 4.54),其中30-39岁人群死亡率最高(SMR: 13.32)。因饮食失调而住院的男性死亡风险更高。神经性厌食症的死亡率并不高于其他饮食失调的诊断。近四分之三的死亡是由自杀/自残或心脏/呼吸系统疾病造成的。结论:在澳大利亚,无论年龄、性别或饮食失调诊断如何,接受医院治疗的饮食失调患者过早死亡的风险更高。性别和年龄组差异可以为政策和资源分配提供信息,并支持制定有针对性的干预措施。
{"title":"Mortality in people with eating disorders presenting to the health system: A national population-based record linkage study.","authors":"Sarah Maguire,Francisco J Schneuer,Kelly M Dann,Sarah Barakat,Jane Miskovic-Wheatley,Moin Ahmed,Morgan Sidari,Grant Sara,Kristi Griffiths,Ian B Hickie,Janice Russell,Stephen Touyz,Sloane Madden,Claire Diffey,Michelle Roberton,Warren Ward,Amy Hannigan,Michelle Cunich,Natasha Nassar","doi":"10.1159/000547950","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547950","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDMost previous mortality research in eating disorders involves individuals attending specialist treatment services. Data linkage across jurisdictional health databases at a population level improves the generalisability of findings.AIMSTo investigate mortality risk and causes of death for people with an eating disorder across a large geographic region using administrative health datasets.METHODUsing linked hospital, mental health and death records, a retrospective cohort study was conducted including individuals aged 10-59 years who received an eating disorder diagnosis during hospital-based encounters in Australia, over a 10-year period between 2010 and 2019. A contemporary cohort of people accessing community care only were also evaluated. Mortality rates and standardised morality ratios (SMR) compared to the general population were calculated for each state, and by sex and age groups. Cox regression models were used to assess the risk of sociodemographic characteristics on mortality.RESULTSMortality in people hospitalised with an eating disorder (N=19,697) was more than four times higher than the general population (SMR: 4.54), and highest in people aged 30-39 years (SMR: 13.32). Men hospitalised for eating disorders had a higher risk of death. Mortality rates in anorexia nervosa were not higher than other eating disorder diagnoses. Almost three-quarters of deaths were caused by suicide/self-harm or cardio/respiratory illness.CONCLUSIONSPeople accessing hospital care with eating disorders in Australia have a higher risk of premature death regardless of age, sex or eating disorder diagnosis. Gender and age group disparities can inform policy and resource allocation and support the development of targeted interventions.","PeriodicalId":20744,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","volume":"24 1","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":22.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144995893","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Enhancing Yoga Interventions in Oncology: Addressing Heterogeneity and Long-term Sustainability. 加强瑜伽干预肿瘤:解决异质性和长期可持续性。
IF 22.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-08-26 DOI: 10.1159/000548052
Jianing Miao,Yaling Li,Jun Li
{"title":"Enhancing Yoga Interventions in Oncology: Addressing Heterogeneity and Long-term Sustainability.","authors":"Jianing Miao,Yaling Li,Jun Li","doi":"10.1159/000548052","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548052","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20744,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","volume":"24 1","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":22.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144959920","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Enhancing Yoga Interventions in Oncology: Addressing Heterogeneity and Long-Term Sustainability. 加强瑜伽干预肿瘤:解决异质性和长期可持续性。
IF 17.4 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-08-26 DOI: 10.1159/000548052
Jianing Miao, Jun Li, Yaling Li
{"title":"Enhancing Yoga Interventions in Oncology: Addressing Heterogeneity and Long-Term Sustainability.","authors":"Jianing Miao, Jun Li, Yaling Li","doi":"10.1159/000548052","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000548052","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20744,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","volume":" ","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":17.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144966334","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Beyond Self-Reports: Integrating Cortisol Measurement in Psychotherapy Process Research among Adolescents with Borderline Personality Pathology. 超越自我报告:在边缘型人格病理学青少年心理治疗过程研究中整合皮质醇测量。
IF 22.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-08-24 DOI: 10.1159/000547941
Yasmine Blaha,Marialuisa Cavelti,Silvano Sele,Julian Koenig,Ronan Zimmermann,Klaus Schmeck,Michael Kaess
Psychotherapy is the primary treatment for adolescent Borderline Personality Pathology (BPP), yet its mechanisms remain unclear. Given potential self-report biases due to alexithymia and impaired interoception, this study examined cortisol responses as a physiological stress marker alongside session ratings from adolescent BPP patients and their therapists to assess its potential as a complementary measure in psychotherapy process research. N = 56 adolescents (94.6% female) with BPP (≥ 3 DSM-IV BPD criteria) receiving Adolescent Identity Treatment or Dialectical Behavioral Therapy and their therapists provided pre- and post-session salivary cortisol samples and completed the Session Evaluation Questionnaire. Residual Dynamic Structural Equation Modelling examined associations between cortisol responses and session ratings, with moderation by age, depression, BPP severity, identity diffusion, and trauma. Cortisol responses did not correlate with session ratings in patients. In therapists, higher cortisol responses were associated with lower session smoothness (r = -.164; p < .001) and deepness (r = -.086; p = .004), as well as with lower positivity (r = -.145; p < .001) and higher arousal (r = .072; p = .012) post-session. Higher depression levels moderated the association between cortisol responses and session deepness in patients (β = -.009, p = .007). While session ratings and cortisol responses correlated in therapists, no such correlation was found in patients. Possible mechanisms include altered interoceptive abilities, dysregulated hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis function, or increased variability in self-ratings or cortisol due to BPP. While physiological markers and self-reports offer complementary insights into psychotherapy processes, future studies should include healthy and clinical controls and baseline investigation of HPA axis function (i.e. stress reactivity) in both groups, along with additional hormonal markers.
心理治疗是青少年边缘性人格病理学(BPP)的主要治疗方法,但其机制尚不清楚。鉴于述情障碍和内感受受损可能导致的自我报告偏差,本研究将皮质醇反应与青少年BPP患者及其治疗师的会话评分一起作为生理应激标记,以评估其作为心理治疗过程研究补充措施的潜力。N = 56名接受青少年认同治疗或辩证行为治疗的BPP(≥3项DSM-IV BPD标准)青少年(94.6%为女性),治疗师提供治疗前和治疗后唾液皮质醇样本,并填写治疗评估问卷。剩余动态结构方程模型检验了皮质醇反应与会话评分之间的关系,并通过年龄、抑郁、BPP严重程度、身份扩散和创伤来调节。皮质醇反应与患者的疗程评分无关。在治疗师中,较高的皮质醇反应与较低的会话平滑度(r = - 0.164; p < 0.001)和深度(r = - 0.086; p = 0.004)以及较低的积极性(r = - 0.145; p < 0.001)和较高的唤醒(r = 0.072; p = 0.012)相关。较高的抑郁水平调节了患者皮质醇反应和会话深度之间的关联(β = - 0.009, p = 0.007)。虽然疗程评分和皮质醇反应在治疗师中有相关性,但在患者中没有发现这种相关性。可能的机制包括内感受能力改变,下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺(HPA)轴功能失调,或由于BPP导致的自我评分或皮质醇变异性增加。虽然生理标记和自我报告为心理治疗过程提供了补充见解,但未来的研究应包括健康和临床对照以及两组中HPA轴功能(即应激反应)的基线调查,以及其他激素标记。
{"title":"Beyond Self-Reports: Integrating Cortisol Measurement in Psychotherapy Process Research among Adolescents with Borderline Personality Pathology.","authors":"Yasmine Blaha,Marialuisa Cavelti,Silvano Sele,Julian Koenig,Ronan Zimmermann,Klaus Schmeck,Michael Kaess","doi":"10.1159/000547941","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547941","url":null,"abstract":"Psychotherapy is the primary treatment for adolescent Borderline Personality Pathology (BPP), yet its mechanisms remain unclear. Given potential self-report biases due to alexithymia and impaired interoception, this study examined cortisol responses as a physiological stress marker alongside session ratings from adolescent BPP patients and their therapists to assess its potential as a complementary measure in psychotherapy process research. N = 56 adolescents (94.6% female) with BPP (≥ 3 DSM-IV BPD criteria) receiving Adolescent Identity Treatment or Dialectical Behavioral Therapy and their therapists provided pre- and post-session salivary cortisol samples and completed the Session Evaluation Questionnaire. Residual Dynamic Structural Equation Modelling examined associations between cortisol responses and session ratings, with moderation by age, depression, BPP severity, identity diffusion, and trauma. Cortisol responses did not correlate with session ratings in patients. In therapists, higher cortisol responses were associated with lower session smoothness (r = -.164; p < .001) and deepness (r = -.086; p = .004), as well as with lower positivity (r = -.145; p < .001) and higher arousal (r = .072; p = .012) post-session. Higher depression levels moderated the association between cortisol responses and session deepness in patients (β = -.009, p = .007). While session ratings and cortisol responses correlated in therapists, no such correlation was found in patients. Possible mechanisms include altered interoceptive abilities, dysregulated hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis function, or increased variability in self-ratings or cortisol due to BPP. While physiological markers and self-reports offer complementary insights into psychotherapy processes, future studies should include healthy and clinical controls and baseline investigation of HPA axis function (i.e. stress reactivity) in both groups, along with additional hormonal markers.","PeriodicalId":20744,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","volume":"11 1","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":22.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144959921","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Beyond Self-Reports: Integrating Cortisol Measurement in Psychotherapy Process Research among Adolescents with Borderline Personality Pathology. 超越自我报告:在边缘型人格病理学青少年心理治疗过程研究中整合皮质醇测量。
IF 17.4 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-08-24 DOI: 10.1159/000547941
Yasmine Blaha, Marialuisa Cavelti, Silvano Sele, Julian Koenig, Ronan Zimmermann, Klaus Schmeck, Michael Kaess

Introduction: Psychotherapy is the primary treatment for adolescent borderline personality pathology (BPP), yet its mechanisms remain unclear. Given potential self-report biases due to alexithymia and impaired interoception, this study examined cortisol responses as a physiological stress marker alongside session ratings from adolescent BPP patients and their therapists to assess its potential as a complementary measure in psychotherapy process research.

Methods: N = 56 adolescents (94.6% female) with BPP (≥3 DSM-IV BPD criteria) receiving Adolescent Identity Treatment or Dialectical Behavioral Therapy and their therapists provided pre- and post-session salivary cortisol samples and completed the Session Evaluation Questionnaire. Residual Dynamic Structural Equation Modeling examined associations between cortisol responses and session ratings, with moderation by age, depression, BPP severity, identity diffusion, and trauma.

Results: Cortisol responses did not correlate with session ratings in patients. In therapists, higher cortisol responses were associated with lower session smoothness (r = -0.164; p < 0.001) and deepness (r = -0.086; p = 0.004), as well as with lower positivity (r = -0.145; p < 0.001) and higher arousal (r = 0.072; p = 0.012) post-session. Higher depression levels moderated the association between cortisol responses and session deepness in patients (β = -0.009, p = 0.007).

Conclusion: While session ratings and cortisol responses correlated in therapists, no such correlation was found in patients. Possible mechanisms include altered interoceptive abilities, dysregulated hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis function, or increased variability in self-ratings or cortisol due to BPP. While physiological markers and self-reports offer complementary insights into psychotherapy processes, future studies should include healthy and clinical controls and baseline investigation of HPA axis function (i.e., stress reactivity) in both groups, along with additional hormonal markers.

心理治疗是青少年边缘性人格病理学(BPP)的主要治疗方法,但其机制尚不清楚。鉴于述情障碍和内感受受损可能导致的自我报告偏差,本研究将皮质醇反应与青少年BPP患者及其治疗师的会话评分一起作为生理应激标记,以评估其作为心理治疗过程研究补充措施的潜力。N = 56名接受青少年认同治疗或辩证行为治疗的BPP(≥3项DSM-IV BPD标准)青少年(94.6%为女性),治疗师提供治疗前和治疗后唾液皮质醇样本,并填写治疗评估问卷。剩余动态结构方程模型检验了皮质醇反应与会话评分之间的关系,并通过年龄、抑郁、BPP严重程度、身份扩散和创伤来调节。皮质醇反应与患者的疗程评分无关。在治疗师中,较高的皮质醇反应与较低的会话平滑度(r = - 0.164; p < 0.001)和深度(r = - 0.086; p = 0.004)以及较低的积极性(r = - 0.145; p < 0.001)和较高的唤醒(r = 0.072; p = 0.012)相关。较高的抑郁水平调节了患者皮质醇反应和会话深度之间的关联(β = - 0.009, p = 0.007)。虽然疗程评分和皮质醇反应在治疗师中有相关性,但在患者中没有发现这种相关性。可能的机制包括内感受能力改变,下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺(HPA)轴功能失调,或由于BPP导致的自我评分或皮质醇变异性增加。虽然生理标记和自我报告为心理治疗过程提供了补充见解,但未来的研究应包括健康和临床对照以及两组中HPA轴功能(即应激反应)的基线调查,以及其他激素标记。
{"title":"Beyond Self-Reports: Integrating Cortisol Measurement in Psychotherapy Process Research among Adolescents with Borderline Personality Pathology.","authors":"Yasmine Blaha, Marialuisa Cavelti, Silvano Sele, Julian Koenig, Ronan Zimmermann, Klaus Schmeck, Michael Kaess","doi":"10.1159/000547941","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000547941","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Psychotherapy is the primary treatment for adolescent borderline personality pathology (BPP), yet its mechanisms remain unclear. Given potential self-report biases due to alexithymia and impaired interoception, this study examined cortisol responses as a physiological stress marker alongside session ratings from adolescent BPP patients and their therapists to assess its potential as a complementary measure in psychotherapy process research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>N = 56 adolescents (94.6% female) with BPP (≥3 DSM-IV BPD criteria) receiving Adolescent Identity Treatment or Dialectical Behavioral Therapy and their therapists provided pre- and post-session salivary cortisol samples and completed the Session Evaluation Questionnaire. Residual Dynamic Structural Equation Modeling examined associations between cortisol responses and session ratings, with moderation by age, depression, BPP severity, identity diffusion, and trauma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cortisol responses did not correlate with session ratings in patients. In therapists, higher cortisol responses were associated with lower session smoothness (r = -0.164; p < 0.001) and deepness (r = -0.086; p = 0.004), as well as with lower positivity (r = -0.145; p < 0.001) and higher arousal (r = 0.072; p = 0.012) post-session. Higher depression levels moderated the association between cortisol responses and session deepness in patients (β = -0.009, p = 0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While session ratings and cortisol responses correlated in therapists, no such correlation was found in patients. Possible mechanisms include altered interoceptive abilities, dysregulated hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis function, or increased variability in self-ratings or cortisol due to BPP. While physiological markers and self-reports offer complementary insights into psychotherapy processes, future studies should include healthy and clinical controls and baseline investigation of HPA axis function (i.e., stress reactivity) in both groups, along with additional hormonal markers.</p>","PeriodicalId":20744,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":17.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144966297","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1