Radiology. Imaging cancer最新文献

Purpose To compare the diagnostic performance of time-intensity curve (TIC) analysis and subjective visual assessment of contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) when integrated with the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) US risk stratification system for characterizing adnexal lesions with solid components. Materials and Methods In this prospective multicenter study conducted from September 2021 to December 2022, female individuals with suspected adnexal lesions containing solid components detected at routine US were enrolled. All participants underwent preoperative CEUS examinations. Histopathologic findings were used as the reference standard for diagnosis. Lesions were classified according to the O-RADS US system. Enhancement of solid tissue compared with the outer myometrium was evaluated using both TIC analysis and subjective visual assessment. The diagnostic performance of O-RADS alone and each CEUS assessment method when integrated with the O-RADS US system was assessed and compared using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Results A total of 180 lesions (80 malignant and 100 benign histopathologic outcomes) in 175 participants (median age, 47 years [IQR, 33-56]) were analyzed. Incorporating CEUS (assessed through both TIC analysis and subjective visual assessment) with O-RADS US showed significantly improved diagnostic performance over O-RADS US alone, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.91) compared with 0.78 (95% CI: 0.71, 0.84). No evidence of a difference was observed between the AUCs of TIC analysis and subjective visual assessment in the enhancement evaluation of solid tissue with CEUS for adnexal malignancy categorization (P = .83). Conclusion Subjective visual assessment and TIC analysis of CEUS features when integrated with the O-RADS US scoring system showed comparable diagnostic performance in assigning adnexal malignancy risk. Keywords: Adnexal Lesions, Contrast-enhanced US, O-RADS, Time-intensity Curve Analysis Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.

Purpose To evaluate racial disparities in preoperative breast MRI use and surgical margin outcomes among patients with recently diagnosed breast cancer. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included patients with breast cancer who presented to a single cancer center between 2008 and 2020, underwent breast surgery, and self-identified as White or Black. Patients were divided into MRI or no-MRI cohorts based on preoperative MRI use. MRI use and positive surgical margin rates were determined for all patients and racial subgroups. Data were collected from the electronic medical record and analyzed using the χ² test for significance. Results The study included 28 384 female patients (mean age, 56 years ± 13 [SD]) with recently diagnosed breast cancer who self-identified as White (90.36%, n = 25 647) or Black (9.64%, n = 2737). Of the entire cohort, 32.78% (9305 of 28 384) underwent preoperative MRI. Black patients had a lower rate of preoperative MRI use than White patients (29.85% [817 of 2737] vs 33.10% [8488 of 25 647], respectively; P < .001). The MRI cohort had a lower positive margin rate compared with the no-MRI cohort (2.90% [133 of 4592] vs 4.78% [539 of 11 271], respectively; P = .03). In the no-MRI cohort, Black patients had a higher positive margin rate than White patients (6.17% [68 of 1103] vs 4.63% [471 of 10 168], respectively; P = .03). In the MRI cohort, there was no evidence of a difference in positive margin rates between Black and White patients (3.17% [12 of 379] vs 2.87% [121 of 4213], respectively; P = .90). Conclusion Compared with White patients, Black patients with breast cancer were less likely to undergo preoperative MRI and had a higher positive surgical margin rate. Keywords: MR Imaging, Breast Cancer, Breast MRI © RSNA, 2024 See also the commentary by Tran and Miles in this issue.