首页 > 最新文献

Psychological Science in the Public Interest最新文献

英文 中文
About the Authors 关于作者
IF 25.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2019-10-01 DOI: 10.1177/1529100619880179
F. Schmid
{"title":"About the Authors","authors":"F. Schmid","doi":"10.1177/1529100619880179","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100619880179","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20879,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Science in the Public Interest","volume":" ","pages":"iii - iv"},"PeriodicalIF":25.4,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1529100619880179","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44282049","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
About the Authors 关于作者
IF 25.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI: 10.1177/1529100619856055
Mieke Bal, Mieke Bal, Michelle Williams, M. Bleeker, Wiep van Bunge, J. F. V. Dijkhuizen
Summarizes results of a recent inventory of service forester activities in 20 Northeastern States. Each year some 500 local state foresters give one-half million hours of technical assistance and advice about the manage- ment of forest resources to nearly 50,000 woodland owners. Yearly on-the-ground help with activities ranging from timber sales to shade tree protection involves more than 2 million acres of nonindustrial private forest.
总结了最近对东北部20个州的森林服务人员活动的调查结果。每年约有500名地方州林业工作者向近50000名林地所有者提供50万小时的森林资源管理技术援助和建议。从木材销售到遮荫树保护,每年的实地帮助涉及200多万英亩的非工业私人森林。
{"title":"About the Authors","authors":"Mieke Bal, Mieke Bal, Michelle Williams, M. Bleeker, Wiep van Bunge, J. F. V. Dijkhuizen","doi":"10.1177/1529100619856055","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100619856055","url":null,"abstract":"Summarizes results of a recent inventory of service forester activities in 20 Northeastern States. Each year some 500 local state foresters give one-half million hours of technical assistance and advice about the manage- ment of forest resources to nearly 50,000 woodland owners. Yearly on-the-ground help with activities ranging from timber sales to shade tree protection involves more than 2 million acres of nonindustrial private forest.","PeriodicalId":20879,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Science in the Public Interest","volume":" ","pages":"iii - iv"},"PeriodicalIF":25.4,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1529100619856055","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48041107","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
About the Authors 关于作者
IF 25.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2019-04-18 DOI: 10.1177/1529100620962097
C. S. Green, Lydia Bradford
C. Shawn Green is an Associate Professor of Psychology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. His research program utilizes both traditional methods (e.g., psychophysics, brain imaging) as well as certain modern forms of media (e.g., video games, virtual reality) to examine factors that influence the rate and generalization of perceptual and cognitive learning. His research has been supported by grants from the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, and the Department of Defense and has been disseminated in such journals as Nature, the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Neuron, Psychological Bulletin, Psychological Science, and Current Biology. Green’s service to psychological science includes serving as an associate editor for both the Journal of Cognitive Enhancement and Technology, Mind, and Behavior. Finally, Green has had a strong focus on sharing science more directly with the general public, including writing a cover article for the pop-science magazine Scientific American and appearing on the Netflix show Bill Nye Saves the World.
C.Shawn Green是威斯康星大学麦迪逊分校的心理学副教授。他的研究项目利用传统方法(如心理物理学、大脑成像)和某些现代形式的媒体(如视频游戏、虚拟现实)来研究影响感知和认知学习的速率和泛化的因素。他的研究得到了美国国家科学基金会、美国国立卫生研究院和国防部的资助,并在《自然》、《美国国家科学院院刊》、《神经元》、《心理学公报》、《心理科学》和《当代生物学》等期刊上发表。格林对心理科学的服务包括担任《认知增强与技术、心理和行为杂志》的副主编。最后,格林非常注重与公众更直接地分享科学,包括为流行科学杂志《科学美国人》撰写封面文章,并出现在Netflix的节目《比尔·奈拯救世界》中。
{"title":"About the Authors","authors":"C. S. Green, Lydia Bradford","doi":"10.1177/1529100620962097","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620962097","url":null,"abstract":"C. Shawn Green is an Associate Professor of Psychology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. His research program utilizes both traditional methods (e.g., psychophysics, brain imaging) as well as certain modern forms of media (e.g., video games, virtual reality) to examine factors that influence the rate and generalization of perceptual and cognitive learning. His research has been supported by grants from the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, and the Department of Defense and has been disseminated in such journals as Nature, the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Neuron, Psychological Bulletin, Psychological Science, and Current Biology. Green’s service to psychological science includes serving as an associate editor for both the Journal of Cognitive Enhancement and Technology, Mind, and Behavior. Finally, Green has had a strong focus on sharing science more directly with the general public, including writing a cover article for the pop-science magazine Scientific American and appearing on the Netflix show Bill Nye Saves the World.","PeriodicalId":20879,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Science in the Public Interest","volume":"21 1","pages":"iii - iv"},"PeriodicalIF":25.4,"publicationDate":"2019-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1529100620962097","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43138826","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
About the Authors. 关于作者。
IF 25.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2019-04-15 DOI: 10.1177/1529100617706076
Alberto Boschetti, L. Massaron
Hamish Coates is a Tenured Professor at Tsinghua University Institute of Education, China, and Deputy Director of Tsinghua University Global Research Centre for the Assessment of College and Student Development. He was Professor of Higher Education at the University of Melbourne, Founding Director of Higher Education Research at the Australian Council for Educational Research, and Program Director at the LH Martin Institute for Tertiary Leadership and Management. He concentrates on improving the quality and productivity of higher education.
哈米什·科茨,清华大学教育研究院终身教授,清华大学全球大学生发展评估研究中心副主任。他曾任墨尔本大学高等教育教授、澳大利亚教育研究理事会高等教育研究创始主任、LH Martin高等领导与管理研究所项目主任。他致力于提高高等教育的质量和生产力。
{"title":"About the Authors.","authors":"Alberto Boschetti, L. Massaron","doi":"10.1177/1529100617706076","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100617706076","url":null,"abstract":"Hamish Coates is a Tenured Professor at Tsinghua University Institute of Education, China, and Deputy Director of Tsinghua University Global Research Centre for the Assessment of College and Student Development. He was Professor of Higher Education at the University of Melbourne, Founding Director of Higher Education Research at the Australian Council for Educational Research, and Program Director at the LH Martin Institute for Tertiary Leadership and Management. He concentrates on improving the quality and productivity of higher education.","PeriodicalId":20879,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Science in the Public Interest","volume":"18 1 1","pages":"iii-iv"},"PeriodicalIF":25.4,"publicationDate":"2019-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1529100617706076","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"65439659","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
About the Authors 关于作者
IF 25.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI: 10.1177/1529100619831747
M. Bergman, Niels Brügger, A. Kantola, Kristin Skare, J. Straubhaar
Jonathan Corbet got his first look at the BSD Unix source back in 1981, when an instructor at the University of Colorado let him “fix” the paging algorithm. He has been digging around inside every system he could get his hands on ever since, working on drivers for VAX, Sun, Ardent, and x86 systems. He got his first Linux system in 1993 and has never looked back. Jonathan is currently the cofounder and executive editor of Linux Weekly News (http://www.LWN.net). He lives in Boulder, Colorado with his wife and two children.
Jonathan Corbet第一次看到BSD Unix源代码是在1981年,当时科罗拉多大学的一位讲师让他“修复”了分页算法。从那以后,他一直在挖掘他能接触到的每一个系统,为VAX、Sun、Ardent和x86系统开发驱动程序。1993年,他获得了第一个Linux系统,从此再也没有回头。Jonathan目前是《Linux周报》的联合创始人和执行主编(http://www.LWN.net)。他与妻子和两个孩子住在科罗拉多州的博尔德市。
{"title":"About the Authors","authors":"M. Bergman, Niels Brügger, A. Kantola, Kristin Skare, J. Straubhaar","doi":"10.1177/1529100619831747","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100619831747","url":null,"abstract":"Jonathan Corbet got his first look at the BSD Unix source back in 1981, when an instructor at the University of Colorado let him “fix” the paging algorithm. He has been digging around inside every system he could get his hands on ever since, working on drivers for VAX, Sun, Ardent, and x86 systems. He got his first Linux system in 1993 and has never looked back. Jonathan is currently the cofounder and executive editor of Linux Weekly News (http://www.LWN.net). He lives in Boulder, Colorado with his wife and two children.","PeriodicalId":20879,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Science in the Public Interest","volume":"19 1","pages":"iv - iv"},"PeriodicalIF":25.4,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1529100619831747","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47264659","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Dedication to Walter Mischel 献给Walter Mischel
IF 25.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI: 10.1177/1529100619828777
{"title":"Dedication to Walter Mischel","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/1529100619828777","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100619828777","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20879,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Science in the Public Interest","volume":"19 1","pages":"iii - iii"},"PeriodicalIF":25.4,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1529100619828777","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42221066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
About the Authors 关于作者
IF 25.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2018-11-01 DOI: 10.1177/1529100618815879
Reginald Wilson
Art Graesser is a Professor in the Department of Psychology and the Institute of Intelligent Systems at the University of Memphis as well as an Honorary Research Fellow at the University of Oxford. His primary research interests are in cognitive science, discourse processing, and the learning sciences. More specific interests include knowledge representation, question asking and answering, tutoring, text comprehension, conversation, emotions, artificial intelligence, and computational linguistics. He served as editor of the journals Discourse Processes (1996–2005) and Journal of Educational Psychology (2009–2014). His service in professional societies includes having been president of the Empirical Studies of Literature, Art, and Media (1989–1992), the Society for Text and Discourse (2007–2010), the International Society for Artificial Intelligence in Education (2007–2009), and the Federation of Associations in the Behavioral and Brain Sciences Foundation (2012–2013). He and his colleagues have developed and tested software in learning, language, and discourse technologies, including those that hold a conversation in natural language and interact with multimedia (such as AutoTutor) and those that analyze text on multiple levels of language and discourse (Coh-Metrix and QUAID). He has served on four Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) expert panels on problem solving, including acting as chair of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2015 Collaborative Problem Solving.
Art Graesser是孟菲斯大学心理学系和智能系统研究所的教授,也是牛津大学的荣誉研究员。主要研究方向为认知科学、语篇处理和学习科学。更具体的兴趣包括知识表示、提问和回答、辅导、文本理解、对话、情感、人工智能和计算语言学。曾任《话语过程》(1996-2005)和《教育心理学杂志》(2009-2014)主编。他曾担任文学、艺术和媒体实证研究协会主席(1989-1992),文本与话语协会主席(2007-2010),国际人工智能教育协会主席(2007-2009),行为与脑科学基金会协会联合会主席(2012-2013)。他和他的同事已经开发并测试了学习、语言和话语技术方面的软件,包括那些用自然语言进行对话并与多媒体交互的软件(如AutoTutor),以及那些在多个语言和话语层面上分析文本的软件(oh- metrix和QUAID)。他曾在经济合作与发展组织(OECD)的四个问题解决专家小组任职,包括担任2015年国际学生评估(PISA)合作问题解决计划的主席。
{"title":"About the Authors","authors":"Reginald Wilson","doi":"10.1177/1529100618815879","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618815879","url":null,"abstract":"Art Graesser is a Professor in the Department of Psychology and the Institute of Intelligent Systems at the University of Memphis as well as an Honorary Research Fellow at the University of Oxford. His primary research interests are in cognitive science, discourse processing, and the learning sciences. More specific interests include knowledge representation, question asking and answering, tutoring, text comprehension, conversation, emotions, artificial intelligence, and computational linguistics. He served as editor of the journals Discourse Processes (1996–2005) and Journal of Educational Psychology (2009–2014). His service in professional societies includes having been president of the Empirical Studies of Literature, Art, and Media (1989–1992), the Society for Text and Discourse (2007–2010), the International Society for Artificial Intelligence in Education (2007–2009), and the Federation of Associations in the Behavioral and Brain Sciences Foundation (2012–2013). He and his colleagues have developed and tested software in learning, language, and discourse technologies, including those that hold a conversation in natural language and interact with multimedia (such as AutoTutor) and those that analyze text on multiple levels of language and discourse (Coh-Metrix and QUAID). He has served on four Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) expert panels on problem solving, including acting as chair of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2015 Collaborative Problem Solving.","PeriodicalId":20879,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Science in the Public Interest","volume":"19 1","pages":"iii - iv"},"PeriodicalIF":25.4,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1529100618815879","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44343627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 318
About the Authors 关于作者
IF 25.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2018-06-01 DOI: 10.1177/1529100618777756
{"title":"About the Authors","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/1529100618777756","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618777756","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20879,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Science in the Public Interest","volume":"19 1","pages":"ii - ii"},"PeriodicalIF":25.4,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1529100618777756","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43557871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
About the Authors 关于作者
IF 25.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2017-12-01 DOI: 10.1177/1529100618766877
S. Harrell
In January 2014, NBR published a two-part interview with Daniel K. Gardner (Smith College) titled “China’s Off-the-Chart Air Pollution and Why It Matters (And Not Only to the Chinese).” The interview touched on a number of issues related not just to pollution and environmental quality in general but also to trade, technology, and quality of life in China, other parts of East Asia, and even the United States. For this roundtable, NBR asked several scholars who work on China and its environmental problems to comment further on the issues raised by Professor Gardner.
2014年1月,NBR发表了对Daniel K.Gardner(史密斯学院)的一篇分为两部分的采访,题为《中国的大气污染及其重要性(不仅对中国人)》。采访涉及到许多问题,不仅涉及污染和环境质量,还涉及中国、东亚其他地区的贸易、技术和生活质量,甚至美国。在这次圆桌会议上,NBR请几位研究中国及其环境问题的学者对Gardner教授提出的问题发表进一步评论。
{"title":"About the Authors","authors":"S. Harrell","doi":"10.1177/1529100618766877","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618766877","url":null,"abstract":"In January 2014, NBR published a two-part interview with Daniel K. Gardner (Smith College) titled “China’s Off-the-Chart Air Pollution and Why It Matters (And Not Only to the Chinese).” The interview touched on a number of issues related not just to pollution and environmental quality in general but also to trade, technology, and quality of life in China, other parts of East Asia, and even the United States. For this roundtable, NBR asked several scholars who work on China and its environmental problems to comment further on the issues raised by Professor Gardner.","PeriodicalId":20879,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Science in the Public Interest","volume":"18 1","pages":"iii - iv"},"PeriodicalIF":25.4,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1529100618766877","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48830520","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 76
Do "Brain-Training" Programs Work? “大脑训练”项目有效吗?
IF 18.2 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2016-10-01 DOI: 10.1177/1529100616661983
Daniel J Simons, Walter R Boot, Neil Charness, Susan E Gathercole, Christopher F Chabris, David Z Hambrick, Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow

In 2014, two groups of scientists published open letters on the efficacy of brain-training interventions, or "brain games," for improving cognition. The first letter, a consensus statement from an international group of more than 70 scientists, claimed that brain games do not provide a scientifically grounded way to improve cognitive functioning or to stave off cognitive decline. Several months later, an international group of 133 scientists and practitioners countered that the literature is replete with demonstrations of the benefits of brain training for a wide variety of cognitive and everyday activities. How could two teams of scientists examine the same literature and come to conflicting "consensus" views about the effectiveness of brain training?In part, the disagreement might result from different standards used when evaluating the evidence. To date, the field has lacked a comprehensive review of the brain-training literature, one that examines both the quantity and the quality of the evidence according to a well-defined set of best practices. This article provides such a review, focusing exclusively on the use of cognitive tasks or games as a means to enhance performance on other tasks. We specify and justify a set of best practices for such brain-training interventions and then use those standards to evaluate all of the published peer-reviewed intervention studies cited on the websites of leading brain-training companies listed on Cognitive Training Data (www.cognitivetrainingdata.org), the site hosting the open letter from brain-training proponents. These citations presumably represent the evidence that best supports the claims of effectiveness.Based on this examination, we find extensive evidence that brain-training interventions improve performance on the trained tasks, less evidence that such interventions improve performance on closely related tasks, and little evidence that training enhances performance on distantly related tasks or that training improves everyday cognitive performance. We also find that many of the published intervention studies had major shortcomings in design or analysis that preclude definitive conclusions about the efficacy of training, and that none of the cited studies conformed to all of the best practices we identify as essential to drawing clear conclusions about the benefits of brain training for everyday activities. We conclude with detailed recommendations for scientists, funding agencies, and policymakers that, if adopted, would lead to better evidence regarding the efficacy of brain-training interventions.

2014年,两组科学家发表了关于大脑训练干预或“大脑游戏”对提高认知能力的功效的公开信。第一封信是一个由70多名科学家组成的国际小组的共识声明,信中声称,益智游戏并没有提供一种有科学依据的方法来改善认知功能或避免认知能力下降。几个月后,一个由133名科学家和实践者组成的国际小组反驳说,文献中充斥着大脑训练对各种认知和日常活动的好处的论证。两组科学家在研究同样的文献时,怎么会就大脑训练的有效性得出相互矛盾的“共识”观点呢?在某种程度上,分歧可能源于评估证据时使用的不同标准。迄今为止,该领域还缺乏对大脑训练文献的全面回顾,也就是根据一套定义良好的最佳实践来检查证据的数量和质量。这篇文章提供了这样的回顾,专注于使用认知任务或游戏作为提高其他任务表现的手段。我们为这种大脑训练干预指定并证明了一套最佳实践,然后使用这些标准来评估所有发表的同行评议的干预研究,这些研究被引用在认知训练数据(www.cognitivetrainingdata.org)上列出的领先的大脑训练公司的网站上,该网站托管着大脑训练支持者的公开信。这些引用大概代表了最能支持有效性声明的证据。基于这项研究,我们发现大量证据表明,大脑训练干预可以提高训练任务的表现,但很少有证据表明,这种干预可以提高密切相关任务的表现,而且很少有证据表明,训练可以提高远距离相关任务的表现,或者训练可以提高日常认知表现。我们还发现,许多已发表的干预研究在设计或分析方面存在重大缺陷,无法得出关于训练效果的明确结论,而且被引用的研究没有一项符合我们认为对得出关于大脑训练对日常活动的好处的明确结论至关重要的所有最佳实践。最后,我们为科学家、资助机构和决策者提供了详细的建议,如果这些建议被采纳,将为大脑训练干预的有效性提供更好的证据。
{"title":"Do \"Brain-Training\" Programs Work?","authors":"Daniel J Simons, Walter R Boot, Neil Charness, Susan E Gathercole, Christopher F Chabris, David Z Hambrick, Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow","doi":"10.1177/1529100616661983","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1529100616661983","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2014, two groups of scientists published open letters on the efficacy of brain-training interventions, or \"brain games,\" for improving cognition. The first letter, a consensus statement from an international group of more than 70 scientists, claimed that brain games do not provide a scientifically grounded way to improve cognitive functioning or to stave off cognitive decline. Several months later, an international group of 133 scientists and practitioners countered that the literature is replete with demonstrations of the benefits of brain training for a wide variety of cognitive and everyday activities. How could two teams of scientists examine the same literature and come to conflicting \"consensus\" views about the effectiveness of brain training?In part, the disagreement might result from different standards used when evaluating the evidence. To date, the field has lacked a comprehensive review of the brain-training literature, one that examines both the quantity and the quality of the evidence according to a well-defined set of best practices. This article provides such a review, focusing exclusively on the use of cognitive tasks or games as a means to enhance performance on other tasks. We specify and justify a set of best practices for such brain-training interventions and then use those standards to evaluate all of the published peer-reviewed intervention studies cited on the websites of leading brain-training companies listed on Cognitive Training Data (www.cognitivetrainingdata.org), the site hosting the open letter from brain-training proponents. These citations presumably represent the evidence that best supports the claims of effectiveness.Based on this examination, we find extensive evidence that brain-training interventions improve performance on the trained tasks, less evidence that such interventions improve performance on closely related tasks, and little evidence that training enhances performance on distantly related tasks or that training improves everyday cognitive performance. We also find that many of the published intervention studies had major shortcomings in design or analysis that preclude definitive conclusions about the efficacy of training, and that none of the cited studies conformed to all of the best practices we identify as essential to drawing clear conclusions about the benefits of brain training for everyday activities. We conclude with detailed recommendations for scientists, funding agencies, and policymakers that, if adopted, would lead to better evidence regarding the efficacy of brain-training interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20879,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Science in the Public Interest","volume":"17 1","pages":"103-186"},"PeriodicalIF":18.2,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"65439575","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Psychological Science in the Public Interest
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1