首页 > 最新文献

Radiation research最新文献

英文 中文
EGO to ECO: Tracing the History of Radioecology from the 1950's to the Present Day. 从 EGO 到 ECO:追溯 1950 年代至今的放射生态学历史。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 BIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1667/RADE-24-00035.1
Bruno F E Matarèse, Rhea Desai, Deborah H Oughton, Carmel Mothersill

This paper starts with a brief history of the birth of the field of radioecology during the Cold War with a focus on US activity. We review the establishment of the international system for radiation protection and the science underlying the guidelines. We then discuss the famous ICRP 60 statement that if "Man" is protected, so is everything else and show how this led to a focus in radioecology on pathways to "Man" rather than concern about impacts on environments or ecosystems. We then review the contributions of Radiation Research Society members and papers published in Radiation Research which contributed to the knowledge base about effects on non-human species. These fed into international databases and computer-based tools such as ERICA and ResRad Biota to guide regulators. We then examine the origins of the concern that ICRP 60 is not sufficient to protect ecosystems and discuss the establishment of ICRP Committee 5 and its recommendations to establish reference animals and plants. The review finishes with current concerns that reference animals and plants (RAPs) are not sufficient to protect ecosystems, given the complexity of interacting factors such as the climate emergency and discusses the efforts of ICRP, the International Union of Radioecologists and other bodies to capture the concepts of ecosystem services and ecosystem complexity modelling in radioecology.

本文首先简要介绍了冷战期间放射生态学领域的诞生历史,重点是美国的活动。我们回顾了国际辐射防护体系的建立以及指导方针的科学依据。然后,我们讨论了著名的国际辐射防护委员会第 60 号声明,即如果 "人 "受到保护,其他一切也将受到保护,并说明这如何导致辐射生态学将重点放在 "人 "的辐射途径上,而不是关注对环境或生态系统的影响。然后,我们回顾了辐射研究学会成员的贡献以及在《辐射研究》上发表的论文,这些都有助于建立有关对非人类物种影响的知识库。这些论文被纳入国际数据库和计算机工具,如 ERICA 和 ResRad Biota,为监管机构提供指导。然后,我们探讨了国际辐射防护委员会第 60 号文件不足以保护生态系统这一担忧的起源,并讨论了国际辐射防护委员会第 5 委员会的成立及其关于建立参照动物和植物的建议。最后,考虑到气候紧急情况等相互作用因素的复杂性,我们还讨论了国际放射防护委员会、国际放射生态学家联盟和其他机构为在放射生态学中体现生态系统服务和生态系统复杂性建模概念所做的努力。
{"title":"EGO to ECO: Tracing the History of Radioecology from the 1950's to the Present Day.","authors":"Bruno F E Matarèse, Rhea Desai, Deborah H Oughton, Carmel Mothersill","doi":"10.1667/RADE-24-00035.1","DOIUrl":"10.1667/RADE-24-00035.1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper starts with a brief history of the birth of the field of radioecology during the Cold War with a focus on US activity. We review the establishment of the international system for radiation protection and the science underlying the guidelines. We then discuss the famous ICRP 60 statement that if \"Man\" is protected, so is everything else and show how this led to a focus in radioecology on pathways to \"Man\" rather than concern about impacts on environments or ecosystems. We then review the contributions of Radiation Research Society members and papers published in Radiation Research which contributed to the knowledge base about effects on non-human species. These fed into international databases and computer-based tools such as ERICA and ResRad Biota to guide regulators. We then examine the origins of the concern that ICRP 60 is not sufficient to protect ecosystems and discuss the establishment of ICRP Committee 5 and its recommendations to establish reference animals and plants. The review finishes with current concerns that reference animals and plants (RAPs) are not sufficient to protect ecosystems, given the complexity of interacting factors such as the climate emergency and discusses the efforts of ICRP, the International Union of Radioecologists and other bodies to capture the concepts of ecosystem services and ecosystem complexity modelling in radioecology.</p>","PeriodicalId":20903,"journal":{"name":"Radiation research","volume":" ","pages":"273-288"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141634331","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Central Role of Cytogenetics in Radiation Biology. 细胞遗传学在辐射生物学中的核心作用。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 BIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1667/RADE-24-00038.1
Susan M Bailey, Stephen R Kunkel, Joel S Bedford, Michael N Cornforth

Radiation cytogenetics has a rich history seldom appreciated by those outside the field. Early radiobiology was dominated by physics and biophysical concepts that borrowed heavily from the study of radiation-induced chromosome aberrations. From such studies, quantitative relationships between biological effect and changes in absorbed dose, dose rate and ionization density were codified into key concepts of radiobiological theory that have persisted for nearly a century. This review aims to provide a historical perspective of some of these concepts, including evidence supporting the contention that chromosome aberrations underlie development of many, if not most, of the biological effects of concern for humans exposed to ionizing radiations including cancer induction, on the one hand, and tumor eradication on the other. The significance of discoveries originating from these studies has widened and extended far beyond their original scope. Chromosome structural rearrangements viewed in mitotic cells were first attributed to the production of breaks by the radiations during interphase, followed by the rejoining or mis-rejoining among ends of other nearby breaks. These relatively modest beginnings eventually led to the discovery and characterization of DNA repair of double-strand breaks by non-homologous end joining, whose importance to various biological processes is now widely appreciated. Two examples, among many, are V(D)J recombination and speciation. Rapid technological advancements in cytogenetics, the burgeoning fields of molecular radiobiology and third-generation sequencing served as a point of confluence between the old and new. As a result, the emergent field of "cytogenomics" now becomes uniquely positioned for the purpose of more fully understanding mechanisms underlying the biological effects of ionizing radiation exposure.

辐射细胞遗传学有着丰富的历史,但该领域以外的人却很少了解。早期的放射生物学以物理学和生物物理学概念为主,这些概念大量借鉴了辐射诱导染色体畸变的研究。从这些研究中,生物效应与吸收剂量、剂量率和电离密度变化之间的定量关系被编纂成放射生物学理论的关键概念,这些概念已延续了近一个世纪。本综述旨在从历史的角度阐述其中的一些概念,包括支持以下论点的证据,即染色体畸变是许多(如果不是大多数)电离辐射对人类产生的生物效应的基础,包括诱发癌症和根除肿瘤。这些研究发现的意义已远远超出其最初的范围。有丝分裂细胞中的染色体结构重排最初被认为是由于间期辐射产生的断裂,随后是附近其他断裂末端的重新连接或错误连接。这些相对温和的开端最终导致了通过非同源末端连接对双链断裂进行 DNA 修复的发现和特征描述,其对各种生物过程的重要性现已得到广泛重视。V(D)J 重组和物种形成就是其中的两个例子。细胞遗传学、新兴的分子放射生物学和第三代测序技术的快速发展成为新旧技术的交汇点。因此,新兴的 "细胞基因组学 "领域在更全面地了解电离辐照的生物效应机制方面具有独特的优势。
{"title":"The Central Role of Cytogenetics in Radiation Biology.","authors":"Susan M Bailey, Stephen R Kunkel, Joel S Bedford, Michael N Cornforth","doi":"10.1667/RADE-24-00038.1","DOIUrl":"10.1667/RADE-24-00038.1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Radiation cytogenetics has a rich history seldom appreciated by those outside the field. Early radiobiology was dominated by physics and biophysical concepts that borrowed heavily from the study of radiation-induced chromosome aberrations. From such studies, quantitative relationships between biological effect and changes in absorbed dose, dose rate and ionization density were codified into key concepts of radiobiological theory that have persisted for nearly a century. This review aims to provide a historical perspective of some of these concepts, including evidence supporting the contention that chromosome aberrations underlie development of many, if not most, of the biological effects of concern for humans exposed to ionizing radiations including cancer induction, on the one hand, and tumor eradication on the other. The significance of discoveries originating from these studies has widened and extended far beyond their original scope. Chromosome structural rearrangements viewed in mitotic cells were first attributed to the production of breaks by the radiations during interphase, followed by the rejoining or mis-rejoining among ends of other nearby breaks. These relatively modest beginnings eventually led to the discovery and characterization of DNA repair of double-strand breaks by non-homologous end joining, whose importance to various biological processes is now widely appreciated. Two examples, among many, are V(D)J recombination and speciation. Rapid technological advancements in cytogenetics, the burgeoning fields of molecular radiobiology and third-generation sequencing served as a point of confluence between the old and new. As a result, the emergent field of \"cytogenomics\" now becomes uniquely positioned for the purpose of more fully understanding mechanisms underlying the biological effects of ionizing radiation exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":20903,"journal":{"name":"Radiation research","volume":" ","pages":"227-259"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141564178","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From Radiation Genetics, Mutagenesis, Gap Junctions, Epigenetics, Stem Cells and an Integration of Radiation and Chemical Carcinogenesis. 从辐射遗传学、突变、间隙连接、表观遗传学、干细胞到辐射和化学致癌的整合。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 BIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1667/RADE-24-00009.1
James E Trosko
{"title":"From Radiation Genetics, Mutagenesis, Gap Junctions, Epigenetics, Stem Cells and an Integration of Radiation and Chemical Carcinogenesis.","authors":"James E Trosko","doi":"10.1667/RADE-24-00009.1","DOIUrl":"10.1667/RADE-24-00009.1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20903,"journal":{"name":"Radiation research","volume":" ","pages":"408-419"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141284634","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Preface to Platinum Issue of Radiation Research. 辐射研究》白金刊序言。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 BIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1667/RADE-24-PLATI.1
Carmel Mothersill, Eleanor A Blakely
{"title":"Preface to Platinum Issue of Radiation Research.","authors":"Carmel Mothersill, Eleanor A Blakely","doi":"10.1667/RADE-24-PLATI.1","DOIUrl":"10.1667/RADE-24-PLATI.1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20903,"journal":{"name":"Radiation research","volume":" ","pages":"101"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141427466","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Research Trends in the Study of the Relative Biological Effectiveness: A Bibliometric Study. 生物相对有效性研究的趋势:文献计量学研究。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 BIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1667/RADE-24-00023.1.S1
L Marignol, S J McMahon

The relative biological effectiveness is a mathematical quantity first defined in the 1950s. This has resulted in more than 4,000 scientific papers published to date. Yet defining the correct value of the RBE to use in clinical practice remains a challenge. A scientific analysis in the radiation research literature can provide an understanding of how this mathematical quantity has evolved. The purpose of this study is to investigate documents published since 1950 using bibliometric indicators and network visualization. This analysis seeks to provide an assessment of global research activities, key themes, and RBE research within the radiation-related field. It strives to highlight top-performing authors, organizations, and nations that have made major contributions to this research domain, as well as their interactions. The Scopus Collection was searched for articles and reviews pertaining to RBE in radiation research from 1950 through 2023. Scopus and Bibiometrix analytic tools were used to investigate the most productive countries, researchers, collaboration networks, journals, along with the citation analysis of references and keywords. A total of 4,632 documents were retrieved produced by authors originating from 71 countries. Publication trends could be separated in 20-year groupings beginning with slow accrual from 1950 to 1970, an early rise from 1970-1990, followed by a sharp increase in the years 1990s-2010s that matches the development of charged particle therapy in clinics worldwide and opened discussion on the true value of the RBE in proton beam therapy. Since the 2010s, a steady 200 papers, on average, have been published per year. The United States produced the most publications overall (N = 1,378) and Radiation Research was the most likely journal to have published articles related to the RBE (606 publications during this period). J. Debus was the most prolific author (112 contributions, with 2,900 citations). The RBE has captured the research interest of over 7,000 authors in the past decade alone. This study supports that notion that the growth of the body of evidence surrounding the RBE, which started 75 years ago, is far from reaching its end. Applications to medicine have continuously dominated the field, with physics competing with Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology for second place over the decades. Future research can be predicted to continue.

相对生物效应是上世纪 50 年代首次定义的一个数学量。迄今为止,已发表了 4000 多篇科学论文。然而,在临床实践中如何定义正确的 RBE 值仍然是一项挑战。通过对辐射研究文献进行科学分析,可以了解这一数学量是如何演变的。本研究的目的是利用文献计量指标和网络可视化技术对 1950 年以来发表的文献进行研究。这项分析旨在对辐射相关领域的全球研究活动、关键主题和 RBE 研究进行评估。它力求突出在这一研究领域做出重大贡献的顶尖作者、组织和国家,以及他们之间的互动。我们在 Scopus 文库中搜索了 1950 年至 2023 年辐射研究领域与 RBE 相关的文章和综述。使用 Scopus 和 Bibiometrix 分析工具调查了最有成果的国家、研究人员、合作网络、期刊,并对参考文献和关键词进行了引文分析。共检索到来自 71 个国家的作者撰写的 4,632 篇文献。论文发表趋势可按20年分组,从1950年至1970年的缓慢增长开始,1970年至1990年的早期增长,随后是1990年代至2010年代的急剧增长,这与带电粒子疗法在全球临床中的发展相吻合,并开启了对质子束疗法中RBE真实价值的讨论。自 2010 年代以来,平均每年稳定发表 200 篇论文。美国发表的论文数量最多(N = 1,378),而《辐射研究》是最有可能发表与 RBE 相关文章的期刊(在此期间发表了 606 篇论文)。J. Debus 是最多产的作者(112 篇文章,2900 次引用)。仅在过去十年中,就有 7,000 多位作者对 RBE 产生了研究兴趣。这项研究支持了这一观点,即围绕 RBE 的证据的增长始于 75 年前,但远未达到终点。几十年来,物理学与生物化学、遗传学和分子生物学在医学应用领域一直占据着主导地位。可以预见,未来的研究仍将继续。
{"title":"Research Trends in the Study of the Relative Biological Effectiveness: A Bibliometric Study.","authors":"L Marignol, S J McMahon","doi":"10.1667/RADE-24-00023.1.S1","DOIUrl":"10.1667/RADE-24-00023.1.S1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The relative biological effectiveness is a mathematical quantity first defined in the 1950s. This has resulted in more than 4,000 scientific papers published to date. Yet defining the correct value of the RBE to use in clinical practice remains a challenge. A scientific analysis in the radiation research literature can provide an understanding of how this mathematical quantity has evolved. The purpose of this study is to investigate documents published since 1950 using bibliometric indicators and network visualization. This analysis seeks to provide an assessment of global research activities, key themes, and RBE research within the radiation-related field. It strives to highlight top-performing authors, organizations, and nations that have made major contributions to this research domain, as well as their interactions. The Scopus Collection was searched for articles and reviews pertaining to RBE in radiation research from 1950 through 2023. Scopus and Bibiometrix analytic tools were used to investigate the most productive countries, researchers, collaboration networks, journals, along with the citation analysis of references and keywords. A total of 4,632 documents were retrieved produced by authors originating from 71 countries. Publication trends could be separated in 20-year groupings beginning with slow accrual from 1950 to 1970, an early rise from 1970-1990, followed by a sharp increase in the years 1990s-2010s that matches the development of charged particle therapy in clinics worldwide and opened discussion on the true value of the RBE in proton beam therapy. Since the 2010s, a steady 200 papers, on average, have been published per year. The United States produced the most publications overall (N = 1,378) and Radiation Research was the most likely journal to have published articles related to the RBE (606 publications during this period). J. Debus was the most prolific author (112 contributions, with 2,900 citations). The RBE has captured the research interest of over 7,000 authors in the past decade alone. This study supports that notion that the growth of the body of evidence surrounding the RBE, which started 75 years ago, is far from reaching its end. Applications to medicine have continuously dominated the field, with physics competing with Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology for second place over the decades. Future research can be predicted to continue.</p>","PeriodicalId":20903,"journal":{"name":"Radiation research","volume":" ","pages":"177-184"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141451375","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Radiation Research Society Journal-based Historical Review of the Use of Biomarkers for Radiation Dose and Injury Assessment: Acute Health Effects Predictions. 辐射研究学会期刊《生物标记用于辐射剂量和伤害评估的历史回顾》:急性健康影响预测。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 BIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1667/RADE-24-00121.1
William F Blakely, Matthias Port, Patrick Ostheim, Michael Abend

A multiple-parameter based approach using radiation-induced clinical signs and symptoms, hematology changes, cytogenetic chromosomal aberrations, and molecular biomarkers changes after radiation exposure is used for biodosimetry-based dose assessment. In the current article, relevant milestones from Radiation Research are documented that forms the basis of the current consensus approach for diagnostics after radiation exposure. For example, in 1962 the use of cytogenetic chromosomal aberration using the lymphocyte metaphase spread dicentric assay for biodosimetry applications was first published in Radiation Research. This assay is now complimented using other cytogenetic chromosomal aberration assays (i.e., chromosomal translocations, cytokinesis-blocked micronuclei, premature chromosome condensation, γ-H2AX foci, etc.). Changes in blood cell counts represent an early-phase biomarker for radiation exposures. Molecular biomarker changes have evolved to include panels of organ-specific plasma proteomic and blood-based gene expression biomarkers for radiation dose assessment. Maturation of these assays are shown by efforts for automated processing and scoring, development of point-of-care diagnostics devices, service laboratories inter-comparison exercises, and applications for dose and injury assessments in radiation accidents. An alternative and complementary approach has been advocated with the focus to de-emphasize "dose" and instead focus on predicting acute or delayed health effects. The same biomarkers used for dose estimation (e.g., lymphocyte counts) can be used to directly predict the later developing severity degree of acute health effects without performing dose estimation as an additional or intermediate step. This review illustrates contributing steps toward these developments published in Radiation Research.

辐照后的剂量评估采用了一种基于多参数的方法,利用辐照引起的临床症状和体征、血液学变化、细胞遗传学染色体畸变和分子生物标志物变化进行评估。本文记录了辐射研究的相关里程碑,这些里程碑构成了当前辐照后诊断共识方法的基础。例如,1962 年,《辐射研究》首次发表了利用淋巴细胞分裂期扩散双中心测定法进行细胞遗传学染色体畸变的生物剂量学应用。现在,这种检测方法还可与其他细胞遗传染色体畸变检测方法(如染色体易位、细胞分裂受阻微核、染色体过早凝聚、γ-H2AX 病灶等)相辅相成。血细胞计数的变化是辐照的早期生物标志物。分子生物标志物的变化已发展到包括器官特异性血浆蛋白质组和基于血液的基因表达生物标志物,用于辐射剂量评估。自动处理和评分、开发护理点诊断设备、服务实验室相互比较练习,以及应用于辐射事故中的剂量和伤害评估,都表明了这些检测方法的成熟。有人主张采用另一种互补方法,即不再强调剂量,而是侧重于预测急性或延迟健康影响。用于剂量估算的相同生物标志物(如淋巴细胞计数)可用于直接预测急性健康影响的后期发展严重程度,而无需将剂量估算作为额外或中间步骤。这篇综述阐述了《辐射研究》(Radiation Research)杂志上发表的对这些发展所做的贡献。
{"title":"Radiation Research Society Journal-based Historical Review of the Use of Biomarkers for Radiation Dose and Injury Assessment: Acute Health Effects Predictions.","authors":"William F Blakely, Matthias Port, Patrick Ostheim, Michael Abend","doi":"10.1667/RADE-24-00121.1","DOIUrl":"10.1667/RADE-24-00121.1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A multiple-parameter based approach using radiation-induced clinical signs and symptoms, hematology changes, cytogenetic chromosomal aberrations, and molecular biomarkers changes after radiation exposure is used for biodosimetry-based dose assessment. In the current article, relevant milestones from Radiation Research are documented that forms the basis of the current consensus approach for diagnostics after radiation exposure. For example, in 1962 the use of cytogenetic chromosomal aberration using the lymphocyte metaphase spread dicentric assay for biodosimetry applications was first published in Radiation Research. This assay is now complimented using other cytogenetic chromosomal aberration assays (i.e., chromosomal translocations, cytokinesis-blocked micronuclei, premature chromosome condensation, γ-H2AX foci, etc.). Changes in blood cell counts represent an early-phase biomarker for radiation exposures. Molecular biomarker changes have evolved to include panels of organ-specific plasma proteomic and blood-based gene expression biomarkers for radiation dose assessment. Maturation of these assays are shown by efforts for automated processing and scoring, development of point-of-care diagnostics devices, service laboratories inter-comparison exercises, and applications for dose and injury assessments in radiation accidents. An alternative and complementary approach has been advocated with the focus to de-emphasize \"dose\" and instead focus on predicting acute or delayed health effects. The same biomarkers used for dose estimation (e.g., lymphocyte counts) can be used to directly predict the later developing severity degree of acute health effects without performing dose estimation as an additional or intermediate step. This review illustrates contributing steps toward these developments published in Radiation Research.</p>","PeriodicalId":20903,"journal":{"name":"Radiation research","volume":" ","pages":"185-204"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141470426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An Overview of Radiation Countermeasure Development in Radiation Research from 1954 to 2024. 1954年至2024年辐射研究领域辐射防护措施发展概况。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 BIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1667/RADE-24-00036.1
Juliann G Kiang, Georgetta Cannon, Vijay K Singh

Preparation for medical responses to major radiation accidents, further driven by increases in the threat of nuclear warfare, has led to a pressing need to understand the underlying mechanisms of radiation injury (RI) alone or in combination with other trauma (combined injury, CI). The identification of these mechanisms suggests molecules and signaling pathways that can be targeted to develop radiation medical countermeasures. Thus far, the United States Food and Drug Administration (U.S. FDA) has approved seven countermeasures to mitigate hematopoietic acute radiation syndrome (H-ARS), but no drugs are available for prophylaxis and no agents have been approved to combat the other sub-syndromes of ARS, let alone delayed effects of acute radiation exposure or the effects of combined injury. From its inception, Radiation Research has significantly contributed to the understanding of the underlying mechanisms of radiation injury and combined injury, and to the development of radiation medical countermeasures for these indications through the publication of peer-reviewed research and review articles.

核战争威胁的增加进一步推动了对重大辐射事故医疗响应的准备工作,这导致人们迫切需要了解辐射损伤(RI)单独或与其他创伤(合并损伤,CI)一起发生的基本机制。对这些机制的鉴定提示了可作为开发辐射医疗对策目标的分子和信号通路。迄今为止,美国食品和药物管理局(U.S. FDA)已经批准了六种缓解造血急性辐射综合征(H-ARS)的对策,但还没有用于预防的药物,也没有批准用于抗击 ARS 的其他亚综合征的药物,更不用说急性辐照的延迟效应或合并损伤的效应了。自成立以来,《辐射研究》通过发表同行评审的研究和评论文章,为了解辐射损伤和合并损伤的基本机制以及针对这些适应症的辐射医疗对策的开发做出了重大贡献。
{"title":"An Overview of Radiation Countermeasure Development in Radiation Research from 1954 to 2024.","authors":"Juliann G Kiang, Georgetta Cannon, Vijay K Singh","doi":"10.1667/RADE-24-00036.1","DOIUrl":"10.1667/RADE-24-00036.1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Preparation for medical responses to major radiation accidents, further driven by increases in the threat of nuclear warfare, has led to a pressing need to understand the underlying mechanisms of radiation injury (RI) alone or in combination with other trauma (combined injury, CI). The identification of these mechanisms suggests molecules and signaling pathways that can be targeted to develop radiation medical countermeasures. Thus far, the United States Food and Drug Administration (U.S. FDA) has approved seven countermeasures to mitigate hematopoietic acute radiation syndrome (H-ARS), but no drugs are available for prophylaxis and no agents have been approved to combat the other sub-syndromes of ARS, let alone delayed effects of acute radiation exposure or the effects of combined injury. From its inception, Radiation Research has significantly contributed to the understanding of the underlying mechanisms of radiation injury and combined injury, and to the development of radiation medical countermeasures for these indications through the publication of peer-reviewed research and review articles.</p>","PeriodicalId":20903,"journal":{"name":"Radiation research","volume":" ","pages":"420-431"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11385179/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141535147","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Endothelial Cell Derived Extracellular Vesicles and Hematopoiesis. 内皮细胞衍生的细胞外囊泡与造血。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 BIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1667/RADE-24-00039.1
Kareena Sukhnanan, Joel R Ross, Nelson J Chao, Benny J Chen

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been recognized as a novel way of cell-to-cell communication in the last several decades. It is believed that EVs exert their functions on nearby or distant cells through transfer of the cargo that they carry. In this review, we focus on EVs produced by endothelial cells, with emphasis on their role in hematopoiesis. We first describe how endothelial cells interact with hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells during development and in disease conditions. We then discuss EVs, ranging from their subtypes to isolation methods and analysis of EVs. With the above background information, we next review the literature related to endothelial cell derived EVs (ECEVs), including physiological functions and their clinical uses. In the last sections, we summarize the current results about the effect of ECEVs on hematopoiesis under physiological and stress conditions.

过去几十年来,细胞外囊泡(EVs)被认为是细胞间通信的一种新方式。人们认为,EVs 通过其携带的货物的转移,对附近或远处的细胞发挥功能。在这篇综述中,我们将重点讨论内皮细胞产生的 EVs,并强调它们在造血过程中的作用。我们首先描述了内皮细胞在发育过程中和疾病状态下如何与造血干细胞/祖细胞相互作用。然后,我们将从EVs的亚型、分离方法和分析等方面讨论EVs。根据上述背景信息,我们接下来回顾了与内皮细胞衍生的EVs(ECEVs)相关的文献,包括生理功能及其临床用途。在最后几节,我们总结了目前有关 ECEVs 在生理和应激条件下对造血的影响的研究结果。
{"title":"Endothelial Cell Derived Extracellular Vesicles and Hematopoiesis.","authors":"Kareena Sukhnanan, Joel R Ross, Nelson J Chao, Benny J Chen","doi":"10.1667/RADE-24-00039.1","DOIUrl":"10.1667/RADE-24-00039.1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been recognized as a novel way of cell-to-cell communication in the last several decades. It is believed that EVs exert their functions on nearby or distant cells through transfer of the cargo that they carry. In this review, we focus on EVs produced by endothelial cells, with emphasis on their role in hematopoiesis. We first describe how endothelial cells interact with hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells during development and in disease conditions. We then discuss EVs, ranging from their subtypes to isolation methods and analysis of EVs. With the above background information, we next review the literature related to endothelial cell derived EVs (ECEVs), including physiological functions and their clinical uses. In the last sections, we summarize the current results about the effect of ECEVs on hematopoiesis under physiological and stress conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20903,"journal":{"name":"Radiation research","volume":" ","pages":"215-226"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141451374","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abscopal Effects, Clastogenic Effects and Bystander Effects: 70 Years of Non-Targeted Effects of Radiation. 缺席效应、致畸效应和旁观者效应:辐射的非目标效应 70 年。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 BIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1667/RADE-24-00040.1
Fiona M Lyng, Edouard I Azzam

In vitro and in vivo observations accumulated over several decades have firmly shown that the biological effects of ionizing radiation can spread from irradiated cells/tissues to non-targeted cells/tissues. Redox-modulated intercellular communication mechanisms that include a role for secreted factors and gap junctions, can mediate these non-targeted effects. Clearly, the expression of such effects and their transmission to progeny cells has implications for issues related to radiation protection. Their elucidation is also relevant towards enhancing the efficacy of cancer radiotherapy and reducing its impact on the development of normal tissue toxicities. In addition, the study of non-targeted effects is pertinent to our basic understanding of intercellular communications under conditions of oxidative stress. This review will trace the history of non-targeted effects of radiation starting with early reports of abscopal effects which described radiation induced effects in tissues distant from the site of radiation exposure. A related effect involved the production of clastogenic factors in plasma following irradiation which can induce chromosome damage in unirradiated cells. Despite these early reports suggesting non-targeted effects of radiation, the classical paradigm that a direct deposition of energy in the nucleus was required still dominated. This paradigm was challenged by papers describing radiation induced bystander effects. This review will cover mechanisms of radiation-induced bystander effects and the potential impacts on radiation protection and radiation therapy.

几十年来积累的体外和体内观察结果充分表明,电离辐射的生物效应可从辐照细胞/组织扩散到非靶细胞/组织。氧化还原调节的细胞间通信机制,包括分泌因子和缝隙连接的作用,可以介导这些非目标效应。显然,这些效应的表达及其向后代细胞的传递对辐射防护相关问题具有影响。阐明这些效应还有助于提高癌症放疗的疗效,减少放疗对正常组织毒性的影响。此外,对非靶向效应的研究还与我们对氧化应激条件下细胞间通讯的基本认识有关。本综述将追溯辐射的非靶向效应的历史,从早期的缺损效应报告开始,该报告描述了辐射在远离辐照部位的组织中引起的效应。与此相关的一种效应涉及辐照后血浆中产生的致畸因子,它可诱发未受辐照细胞的染色体损伤。尽管这些早期的报告表明辐射具有非靶向效应,但需要能量直接沉积在细胞核中的经典范式仍占主导地位。描述辐射诱导旁观者效应的论文对这一范式提出了挑战。本综述将介绍辐射诱导的旁观者效应的机制及其对辐射防护和放射治疗的潜在影响。
{"title":"Abscopal Effects, Clastogenic Effects and Bystander Effects: 70 Years of Non-Targeted Effects of Radiation.","authors":"Fiona M Lyng, Edouard I Azzam","doi":"10.1667/RADE-24-00040.1","DOIUrl":"10.1667/RADE-24-00040.1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In vitro and in vivo observations accumulated over several decades have firmly shown that the biological effects of ionizing radiation can spread from irradiated cells/tissues to non-targeted cells/tissues. Redox-modulated intercellular communication mechanisms that include a role for secreted factors and gap junctions, can mediate these non-targeted effects. Clearly, the expression of such effects and their transmission to progeny cells has implications for issues related to radiation protection. Their elucidation is also relevant towards enhancing the efficacy of cancer radiotherapy and reducing its impact on the development of normal tissue toxicities. In addition, the study of non-targeted effects is pertinent to our basic understanding of intercellular communications under conditions of oxidative stress. This review will trace the history of non-targeted effects of radiation starting with early reports of abscopal effects which described radiation induced effects in tissues distant from the site of radiation exposure. A related effect involved the production of clastogenic factors in plasma following irradiation which can induce chromosome damage in unirradiated cells. Despite these early reports suggesting non-targeted effects of radiation, the classical paradigm that a direct deposition of energy in the nucleus was required still dominated. This paradigm was challenged by papers describing radiation induced bystander effects. This review will cover mechanisms of radiation-induced bystander effects and the potential impacts on radiation protection and radiation therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":20903,"journal":{"name":"Radiation research","volume":" ","pages":"355-367"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141580718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
"Lethal Mutations" a Misnomer or the Start of a Scientific Revolution? "致命突变 "是名不副实还是科学革命的开端?
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 BIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1667/RADE-24-00018.1
Carmel Mothersill, Rhea Desai, Colin B Seymour, Marc S Mendonca

The aim of this paper is to review the history surrounding the discovery of lethal mutations, later described as delayed reproductive death. Lethal mutations were suggested very early on, to be due to a generalised instability in a cell population and are considered now to be one of the first demonstrations of "radiation-induced genomic instability" which led later to the establishment of the field of "non-targeted effects." The phenomenon was first described by Seymour et al. in 1986 and was confirmed by Trott's group in Europe and by Little and colleagues in the United States before being extended by Mendonca et al. in 1989, who showed conclusively that the distinguishing feature of lethal mutation occurrence was that it happened suddenly after about 9-10 population doublings in progeny which had survived the original dose of ionizing radiation. However, many authors then suggested that in fact, lethal mutations were implicit in the original experiments by Puck and Marcus in 1956 and were described in the extensive work by Sinclair in 1964, who followed clonal progeny for up to a year after irradiation and described "small colony formation" as a persistent consequence of ionizing radiation exposure. In this paper, we examine the history from 1956 to the present using the period from 1986-1989 as an anchor point to reach into the past and to go forward through the evolution of the field of low dose radiobiology where non-targeted effects predominate.

本文旨在回顾与发现致死突变(后来被描述为生殖延迟死亡)有关的历史。致命突变很早就被认为是由于细胞群中普遍存在的不稳定性造成的,现在被认为是 "辐射诱导基因组不稳定性 "的首批证据之一,这也导致了后来 "非目标效应 "领域的建立。西摩等人于 1986 年首次描述了这一现象,欧洲的特罗特研究小组和美国的利特尔及其同事证实了这一现象,1989 年门东卡等人对这一现象进行了扩展,他们明确指出,致命突变发生的显著特征是,在最初剂量的电离辐射中存活下来的后代中,突变发生在大约 9-10 个群体倍增之后。然而,许多学者随后提出,事实上,致命突变隐含在帕克和马库斯于 1956 年进行的原始实验中,并在辛克莱尔于 1964 年进行的大量工作中有所描述,辛克莱尔在辐照后对克隆后代进行了长达一年的跟踪,并将 "小菌落形成 "描述为电离辐射照射的持续后果。在本文中,我们以 1986-1989 年为锚点,回顾了 1956 年至今的历史,并通过非靶效应占主导地位的低剂量放射生物学领域的演变向前推进。
{"title":"\"Lethal Mutations\" a Misnomer or the Start of a Scientific Revolution?","authors":"Carmel Mothersill, Rhea Desai, Colin B Seymour, Marc S Mendonca","doi":"10.1667/RADE-24-00018.1","DOIUrl":"10.1667/RADE-24-00018.1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this paper is to review the history surrounding the discovery of lethal mutations, later described as delayed reproductive death. Lethal mutations were suggested very early on, to be due to a generalised instability in a cell population and are considered now to be one of the first demonstrations of \"radiation-induced genomic instability\" which led later to the establishment of the field of \"non-targeted effects.\" The phenomenon was first described by Seymour et al. in 1986 and was confirmed by Trott's group in Europe and by Little and colleagues in the United States before being extended by Mendonca et al. in 1989, who showed conclusively that the distinguishing feature of lethal mutation occurrence was that it happened suddenly after about 9-10 population doublings in progeny which had survived the original dose of ionizing radiation. However, many authors then suggested that in fact, lethal mutations were implicit in the original experiments by Puck and Marcus in 1956 and were described in the extensive work by Sinclair in 1964, who followed clonal progeny for up to a year after irradiation and described \"small colony formation\" as a persistent consequence of ionizing radiation exposure. In this paper, we examine the history from 1956 to the present using the period from 1986-1989 as an anchor point to reach into the past and to go forward through the evolution of the field of low dose radiobiology where non-targeted effects predominate.</p>","PeriodicalId":20903,"journal":{"name":"Radiation research","volume":" ","pages":"205-214"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141451373","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Radiation research
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1