Radiation research最新文献

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been recognized as a novel way of cell-to-cell communication in the last several decades. It is believed that EVs exert their functions on nearby or distant cells through transfer of the cargo that they carry. In this review, we focus on EVs produced by endothelial cells, with emphasis on their role in hematopoiesis. We first describe how endothelial cells interact with hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells during development and in disease conditions. We then discuss EVs, ranging from their subtypes to isolation methods and analysis of EVs. With the above background information, we next review the literature related to endothelial cell derived EVs (ECEVs), including physiological functions and their clinical uses. In the last sections, we summarize the current results about the effect of ECEVs on hematopoiesis under physiological and stress conditions.

In vitro and in vivo observations accumulated over several decades have firmly shown that the biological effects of ionizing radiation can spread from irradiated cells/tissues to non-targeted cells/tissues. Redox-modulated intercellular communication mechanisms that include a role for secreted factors and gap junctions, can mediate these non-targeted effects. Clearly, the expression of such effects and their transmission to progeny cells has implications for issues related to radiation protection. Their elucidation is also relevant towards enhancing the efficacy of cancer radiotherapy and reducing its impact on the development of normal tissue toxicities. In addition, the study of non-targeted effects is pertinent to our basic understanding of intercellular communications under conditions of oxidative stress. This review will trace the history of non-targeted effects of radiation starting with early reports of abscopal effects which described radiation induced effects in tissues distant from the site of radiation exposure. A related effect involved the production of clastogenic factors in plasma following irradiation which can induce chromosome damage in unirradiated cells. Despite these early reports suggesting non-targeted effects of radiation, the classical paradigm that a direct deposition of energy in the nucleus was required still dominated. This paradigm was challenged by papers describing radiation induced bystander effects. This review will cover mechanisms of radiation-induced bystander effects and the potential impacts on radiation protection and radiation therapy.

The aim of this paper is to review the history surrounding the discovery of lethal mutations, later described as delayed reproductive death. Lethal mutations were suggested very early on, to be due to a generalised instability in a cell population and are considered now to be one of the first demonstrations of "radiation-induced genomic instability" which led later to the establishment of the field of "non-targeted effects." The phenomenon was first described by Seymour et al. in 1986 and was confirmed by Trott's group in Europe and by Little and colleagues in the United States before being extended by Mendonca et al. in 1989, who showed conclusively that the distinguishing feature of lethal mutation occurrence was that it happened suddenly after about 9-10 population doublings in progeny which had survived the original dose of ionizing radiation. However, many authors then suggested that in fact, lethal mutations were implicit in the original experiments by Puck and Marcus in 1956 and were described in the extensive work by Sinclair in 1964, who followed clonal progeny for up to a year after irradiation and described "small colony formation" as a persistent consequence of ionizing radiation exposure. In this paper, we examine the history from 1956 to the present using the period from 1986-1989 as an anchor point to reach into the past and to go forward through the evolution of the field of low dose radiobiology where non-targeted effects predominate.

Several scientific themes are reviewed in the context of the 75-year period relevant to this special platinum issue of Radiation Research. Two criteria have been considered in selecting the scientific themes. One is the exposure of the associated research activity in the annual meetings of the Radiation Research Society (RRS) and in the publications of the Society's Journal, thus reflecting the interest of members of RRS. The second criteria is a focus on contributions from Australian members of RRS. The first theme is the contribution of radiobiology to radiation oncology, featuring two prominent Australian radiation oncologists, the late Rod Withers and his younger colleague, Lester Peters. Two other themes are also linked to radiation oncology; preclinical research aimed at developing experimental radiotherapy modalities, namely microbeam radiotherapy (MRT) and Auger endoradiotherapy. The latter has a long history, in contrast to MRT, especially in Australia, given that the associated medical beamline at the Australian Synchrotron in Melbourne only opened in 2011. Another theme is DNA repair, which has a trajectory parallel to the 75-year period of interest, given the birth of molecular biology in the 1950s. The low-dose radiobiology theme has a similar timeline, predominantly prompted by the nuclear era, which is also connected to the radioprotector theme, although radioprotectors also have a long-established potential utility in cancer radiotherapy. Finally, two themes are associated with biodosimetry. One is the micronucleus assay, highlighting the pioneering contribution from Michael Fenech in Adelaide, South Australia, and the other is the γ-H2AX assay and its widespread clinical applications.

At the dawn of the 20th Century, the underlying chemistry that produced the observed effects of ionizing radiation, e.g., X rays and Radium salts, on aqueous solutions was either unknown or restricted to products found postirradiation. For example, the Curies noted that sealed aqueous solutions of Radium inexplicably decomposed over time, even when kept in the dark. By 1928 there were numerous papers describing the phenomenological effects of ionizing radiation on a wide variety of materials, including the irradiated hands of early radiologists. One scientist who became intensely interested in these radiation effects was Hugo Fricke (Fricke Dosimetry) who established a laboratory in 1928 dedicated to studies on chemical effects of radiation, the results of which he believed were necessary to understand observed radiobiological effects. In this Platinum Issue of Radiation Research (70 years of continuous publication), we present the early history of the development of radiation chemistry and its contributions to all levels of mechanistic radiobiology. We summarize its development as one of the four disciplinary pillars of the Radiation Research Society and its Journal, Radiation Research, founded during the period 1952-1954. In addition, the work of scientists who contributed substantially to the discipline of Radiation Chemistry and to the birth, life and culture of the Society and its journal is presented. In the years following 1954, the increasing knowledge about the underlying temporal and spatial properties of the species produced by various types of radiation is summarized and related to its radiobiology and to modern technologies (e.g., pulsed radiolysis, electron paramagnetic resonance) which became available as the discipline of radiation chemistry developed. A summary of important results from these studies on Radiation Chemistry/Biochemistry in the 20th and 21st Century up to the present time is presented. Finally, we look into the future to see what possible directions radiation chemistry studies might take, based upon promising current research. We find at least two possible directions that will need radiation chemistry expertise to ensure proper experimental design and interpretation of data. These are FLASH radiotherapy, and mechanisms underlying the effects of low doses of radiation delivered at low dose rates. Examples of how radiation chemists could provide beneficial input to these studies are provided.

Numerous dose rate effects have been described over the past 6-7 decades in the radiation biology and radiation oncology literature depending on the dose rate range being discussed. This review focuses on the impact and understanding of altering dose rates in the context of radiation therapy, but does not discuss dose rate effects as relevant to radiation protection. The review starts with a short historic review of early studies on dose rate effects, considers mechanisms thought to underlie dose rate dependencies, then discusses some current issues in clinical findings with altered dose rates, the importance of dose rate in brachytherapy, and the current timely topic of the use of very high dose rates, so-called FLASH radiotherapy. The discussion includes dose rate effects in vitro in cultured cells, in in vivo experimental systems and in the clinic, including both tumors and normal tissues. Gaps in understanding dose rate effects are identified, as are opportunities for improving clinical use of dose rate modulation.

When environmental impact and risks associated with radioactive contamination of ecosystems are assessed, the source term and deposition must be linked to ecosystem transfer, biological uptake and effects in exposed organisms. Thus, a well-defined source term is the starting point for transport, dose, impact and risk models. After the Chornobyl accident, 3-4 tons of spent nuclear fuel were released and radioactive particles were important ingrediencies of the actual source term. As Chornobyl particles were observed in many European countries, some scientists suggested that radioactive particles were "a peculiarity of the Chornobyl accident." In contrast, research over the years has shown that a major fraction of refractory elements such as uranium (U) and plutonium (Pu) released to the environment has been released as particles following a series of past events such as nuclear weapons tests, non-criticality accidents involving nuclear weapons, military use of depleted uranium ammunition, and nuclear reactor accidents. Radioactive particles and colloids have also been observed in discharges from nuclear installations to rivers or to regional seas and are associated with nuclear waste dumped at sea. Furthermore, radioactive particles have been identified at uranium mining and tailing sites as well as at other NORM sites such as phosphate or oil and gas industrial facilities. Research has also demonstrated that particle characteristics such as elemental composition depend on the emitting source, while characteristics such as size distribution, structure, and oxidation state influencing ecosystem transfer will also depend on the release scenarios. Thus, access to advanced particle characteristic techniques is essential within radioecology. After deposition, localized heterogeneities such as particles will be unevenly distributed in the environment. Thus, inventories can be underestimated, and impact and risk assessments of particle contaminated areas may suffer from unacceptable large uncertainties if radioactive particles are ignored. The present paper will focus on key sources contributing to the release of radioactive particles to the environments, as well as linking particle characteristics to ecosystem behavior and potential biological effects.

This review aims to trace the evolution of dosimetry, highlight its significance in the advancement of radiation research, and identify the current trends and methodologies in the field. Key historical milestones, starting with the first publications in the journal in 1954, will be synthesized before addressing contemporary practices in radiation medicine and radiobiological investigation. Finally, possibilities for future opportunities in dosimetry will be offered. The overarching goal is to emphasize the indispensability of accurate and reproducible dosimetry in enhancing the quality of radiation research and practical applications of ionizing radiation.

Radiation research is a multidisciplinary field, and among its many branches, mathematical and computational modelers have played a significant role in advancing boundaries of knowledge. A fundamental contribution is modelling cellular response to ionizing radiation as that is the key to not only understanding how radiation can kill cancer cells, but also cause cancer and other health issues. The invention of microdosimetry in the 1950s by Harold Rossi paved the way for brilliant scientists to study the mechanism of radiation at cellular and sub-cellular scales. This paper reviews some snippets of ingenious mathematical and computational models published in microdosimetry symposium proceedings and publications of the radiation research community. Among these are simulations of radiation tracks at atomic and molecular levels using Monte Carlo methods, models of cell survival, quantification of the amount of energy required to create a single strand break, and models of DNA-damage-repair. These models can broadly be categorized into mechanistic, semi-mechanistic, and phenomenological approaches, and this review seeks to provide historical context of their development. We salute pioneers of the field and great teachers who supported and educated the younger members of the community and showed them how to build upon their work.

The concept of radiation-induced clustered damage in DNA has grown over the past several decades to become a topic of considerable interest across the scientific disciplines involved in studies of the biological effects of ionizing radiation. This paper, prepared for the 70th anniversary issue of Radiation Research, traces historical development of the three main threads of physics, chemistry, and biochemical/cellular responses that led to the hypothesis and demonstration that a key component of the biological effectiveness of ionizing radiation is its characteristic of producing clustered DNA damage of varying complexities. The physics thread has roots that started as early as the 1920s, grew to identify critical nanometre-scale clusterings of ionizations relevant to biological effectiveness, and then, by the turn of the century, had produced an extensive array of quantitative predictions on the complexity of clustered DNA damage from different radiations. Monte Carlo track structure simulation techniques played a key role through these developments, and they are now incorporated into many recent and ongoing studies modelling the effects of radiation. The chemistry thread was seeded by water-radiolysis descriptions of events in water as radical-containing "spurs," demonstration of the important role of the hydroxyl radical in radiation-inactivation of cells and the difficulty of protection by radical scavengers. This led to the concept and description of locally multiply damaged sites (LMDS) for DNA double-strand breaks and other combinations of DNA base damage and strand breakage that could arise from a spur overlapping, or created in very close proximity to, the DNA. In these ways, both the physics and the chemistry threads, largely in parallel, put out the challenge to the experimental research community to verify these predictions of clustered DNA damage from ionizing radiations and to investigate their relevance to DNA repair and subsequent cellular effects. The third thread, biochemical and cell-based research, responded strongly to the challenge by demonstrating the existence and biological importance of clustered DNA damage. Investigations have included repair of a wide variety of defined constructs of clustered damage, evaluation of mutagenic consequences, identification of clustered base-damage within irradiated cells, and identification of co-localization of repair complexes indicative of complex clustered damage after high-LET irradiation, as well as extensive studies of the repair pathways involved in repair of simple double-strand breaks. There remains, however, a great deal more to be learned because of the diversity of clustered DNA damage and of the biological responses.