Pub Date : 2019-08-12DOI: 10.16890/RSTPR.A7.N14.P84
R. Vasconcelos
What would be the main challenges and current perspectives of the Permanent Review Tribunal fifteen years after the settlement of its offices in the Republic of Paraguay? Normative, doctrinal and practical sources are used in an attempt to comply with the reflections proposed. The paper points the centrality of institutionalized dispute settlement systems as a requirement to identify international organizations to show that MERCOSUR not only fulfills the requirement but also has an improved framework to solve disputes. Diplomacy gains centrality in the debate when the tribunal is analyzed as the possible structure for the desired integration and when identifying the positive factors that led to the choice of Asuncion to receive its offices. Finally, the paper concludes its appointments with an overview of the development of the atypical functions of the tribunal that successfully promote its expanded operation nowadays.
{"title":"O TPR e o MERCOSUL: os 15 Anos do Fiador do Direito Regional","authors":"R. Vasconcelos","doi":"10.16890/RSTPR.A7.N14.P84","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.16890/RSTPR.A7.N14.P84","url":null,"abstract":"What would be the main challenges and current perspectives of the Permanent Review Tribunal fifteen years after the settlement of its offices in the Republic of Paraguay? Normative, doctrinal and practical sources are used in an attempt to comply with the reflections proposed. The paper points the centrality of institutionalized dispute settlement systems as a requirement to identify international organizations to show that MERCOSUR not only fulfills the requirement but also has an improved framework to solve disputes. Diplomacy gains centrality in the debate when the tribunal is analyzed as the possible structure for the desired integration and when identifying the positive factors that led to the choice of Asuncion to receive its offices. Finally, the paper concludes its appointments with an overview of the development of the atypical functions of the tribunal that successfully promote its expanded operation nowadays.","PeriodicalId":211591,"journal":{"name":"Rev. secr. Trib. perm. revis.","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116257912","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-08-12DOI: 10.16890/RSTPR.A7.N14.P129
Magdalena Bas Vilizzio
The purpose of this article is to determine the correspondence of the princSixty years after the signing of the first bilateral investment treaty, investor-State dispute resolution regime is under a process of change and strong criticism, particularly the disputes in which investors question State measures that protect human rights (access to drinking water, public health, and environment among others). In this context, this paper aims to analyse if there is a confluence or bifurcation of roads in investor-State disputes involving human rights. The answer to that question will be given through the selection and analysis of the two cases, Eco Oro versus Colombia and Bear Creek versus Peru, clear examples of fragmentation of International Law.
{"title":"Protección de los derechos humanos en la solución de controversias inversor-Estado: ¿confluencia o bifurcación de caminos?","authors":"Magdalena Bas Vilizzio","doi":"10.16890/RSTPR.A7.N14.P129","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.16890/RSTPR.A7.N14.P129","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to determine the correspondence of the princSixty years after the signing of the first bilateral investment treaty, investor-State dispute resolution regime is under a process of change and strong criticism, particularly the disputes in which investors question State measures that protect human rights (access to drinking water, public health, and environment among others). In this context, this paper aims to analyse if there is a confluence or bifurcation of roads in investor-State disputes involving human rights. The answer to that question will be given through the selection and analysis of the two cases, Eco Oro versus Colombia and Bear Creek versus Peru, clear examples of fragmentation of International Law.","PeriodicalId":211591,"journal":{"name":"Rev. secr. Trib. perm. revis.","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132883079","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-08-12DOI: 10.16890/RSTPR.A7.N14.P44
P. Maraniello
The power of any constitutional judge is to verify that the rules are involved in the dispute are not contrary to the Constitution. From there it was gaining strength judicial review of judges as the most important power. Then, with the hierarchy of international human rights and international commitment of countries in compliance, he was born with control-conventionality. But integration treaties, not be part of both have very particular issues that need to be addressed in a very specific way, where judges and regional bodies, they must develop through integraciona-lity control.
{"title":"Control de integracionalidad. La garantía de respeto y cumplimiento de los Tratados de Integración","authors":"P. Maraniello","doi":"10.16890/RSTPR.A7.N14.P44","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.16890/RSTPR.A7.N14.P44","url":null,"abstract":"The power of any constitutional judge is to verify that the rules are involved in the dispute are not contrary to the Constitution. From there it was gaining strength judicial review of judges as the most important power. Then, with the hierarchy of international human rights and international commitment of countries in compliance, he was born with control-conventionality. But integration treaties, not be part of both have very particular issues that need to be addressed in a very specific way, where judges and regional bodies, they must develop through integraciona-lity control.","PeriodicalId":211591,"journal":{"name":"Rev. secr. Trib. perm. revis.","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116780278","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-08-12DOI: 10.16890/RSTPR.A7.N14.P97
M. Méndez
On the occasion of the 15 years of installation of the Permanent Review Court (TPR) in the city of Asunción, this work aims to present the historical aspects, arranged chronologically, that led to its installation and, also, to expose the evolution of the Dispute Settlement System, in particular, as regards the TPR.
{"title":"Tribunal Permanente de Revisión en la línea del tiempo. 2002-2019","authors":"M. Méndez","doi":"10.16890/RSTPR.A7.N14.P97","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.16890/RSTPR.A7.N14.P97","url":null,"abstract":"On the occasion of the 15 years of installation of the Permanent Review Court (TPR) in the city of Asunción, this work aims to present the historical aspects, arranged chronologically, that led to its installation and, also, to expose the evolution of the Dispute Settlement System, in particular, as regards the TPR.","PeriodicalId":211591,"journal":{"name":"Rev. secr. Trib. perm. revis.","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124985519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-08-12DOI: 10.16890/RSTPR.A7.N14.P244
H. Guedes
Promoting a dialogue between art, law, sports and war, this paper sheds light to the growing relevance of the Swiss concept of public order in private international law with regard to transnational private regimes, bringing the examples of private international law of sports and the self-regulatory scheme of international security companies. Starting with literature review and the discussion of normative documents such as FIFA Regulations, ICoCA Articles of Association and Swiss law, this paper, under inductive method, intends to identify if the purportedly transnational content of private regimes needs to observe any public order. The subject is relevant due to the multiplication of transnational private regimes, such as ICANN for the Internet and “lex mercatoria” for commercial transactions; moreover, the paper aims at identifying possible contradictions in the idea that such orders are autonomous, making an analogy with the Dadaist artistic movement. This contribution, finally, points out that in the two studied examples, there is a clear overvaluation of Swiss law in spite of imperative foreign norms and suggests that such conclusion might be extended to other types of private ordering.
{"title":"Da transnacionalidade ao helvetismo: dadaísmo, ordem pública e regimes transnacionais privados","authors":"H. Guedes","doi":"10.16890/RSTPR.A7.N14.P244","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.16890/RSTPR.A7.N14.P244","url":null,"abstract":"Promoting a dialogue between art, law, sports and war, this paper sheds light to the growing relevance of the Swiss concept of public order in private international law with regard to transnational private regimes, bringing the examples of private international law of sports and the self-regulatory scheme of international security companies. Starting with literature review and the discussion of normative documents such as FIFA Regulations, ICoCA Articles of Association and Swiss law, this paper, under inductive method, intends to identify if the purportedly transnational content of private regimes needs to observe any public order. The subject is relevant due to the multiplication of transnational private regimes, such as ICANN for the Internet and “lex mercatoria” for commercial transactions; moreover, the paper aims at identifying possible contradictions in the idea that such orders are autonomous, making an analogy with the Dadaist artistic movement. This contribution, finally, points out that in the two studied examples, there is a clear overvaluation of Swiss law in spite of imperative foreign norms and suggests that such conclusion might be extended to other types of private ordering.","PeriodicalId":211591,"journal":{"name":"Rev. secr. Trib. perm. revis.","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127197893","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-08-12DOI: 10.16890/RSTPR.A7.N14.P283
A. Safarov
The emergence of MERCOSUR generated a great expectation in the political and economic actors of the regions of the countries that make it up. In the year 1997, the provinces of the historic Northwest Argentine Region (NOA: Jujuy, Salta, Catamarca, La Rioja and Tucu-man) joined other transboundary regions to constitute a space of political agreement that generates tools to develop public policy strategies and discuss development strategies with the National States. This article briefly covers some milestones that correspond to the search for the development and modernization of the region cited through the most important ex-ample of South American paradiplomacy. The route starts from the very conformation of the National States through the Conquest and Colonization of the Spanish Empire and con-tinues with the path forming part of the new Argentine State and its attempts to re-establish relationships with the sister regions of what was the former Viceroyalty of the Peru. The Reform of the Argentine Constitution in 1994, constituted for this region and for many others, a milestone for the initiation of public policies of international linkage, added to the fundamental change that meant the MERCOSUR process and the agreements reached with Chile and Bolivia, in 1996 and 1997 through the economic complementation agreements. The search for the NOA is illustrative of the need for Latin American countries to resolve the asymmetries between the center and the periphery of the countries.
{"title":"La paradiplomacia del noroeste argentino: el caso ZICOSUR","authors":"A. Safarov","doi":"10.16890/RSTPR.A7.N14.P283","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.16890/RSTPR.A7.N14.P283","url":null,"abstract":"The emergence of MERCOSUR generated a great expectation in the political and economic actors of the regions of the countries that make it up. In the year 1997, the provinces of the historic Northwest Argentine Region (NOA: Jujuy, Salta, Catamarca, La Rioja and Tucu-man) joined other transboundary regions to constitute a space of political agreement that generates tools to develop public policy strategies and discuss development strategies with the National States. This article briefly covers some milestones that correspond to the search for the development and modernization of the region cited through the most important ex-ample of South American paradiplomacy. The route starts from the very conformation of the National States through the Conquest and Colonization of the Spanish Empire and con-tinues with the path forming part of the new Argentine State and its attempts to re-establish relationships with the sister regions of what was the former Viceroyalty of the Peru. The Reform of the Argentine Constitution in 1994, constituted for this region and for many others, a milestone for the initiation of public policies of international linkage, added to the fundamental change that meant the MERCOSUR process and the agreements reached with Chile and Bolivia, in 1996 and 1997 through the economic complementation agreements. The search for the NOA is illustrative of the need for Latin American countries to resolve the asymmetries between the center and the periphery of the countries.","PeriodicalId":211591,"journal":{"name":"Rev. secr. Trib. perm. revis.","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127565540","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-03-30DOI: 10.16890/RSTPR.A7.N13.P137
C. Magallanes
Currently human mobility is increasing, especially driven by reasons that push them to involuntarily migrate through the region, reasons such as the generalized and systematic violence of the Central American countries, the acute crisis of the countries of the region, currently Venezuela , Argentina, Nicaragua, among others, climate change, among other causes, added to this, international refugees from the war in Syria.A human tragedy of unprecedented magnitude, which gives rise to the frequent use of legal institutes of international protection, asylum and refuge, used interchangeably and often imprecisely and even confused, especially in the Latin American and Caribbean region. In Latin America and the Caribbean, depending on the country or the regional regulation in question, both terms are used inaccurately or in synonyms in their domestic legislation, something that is erroneous and that is intended to be evidenced in this work or to conclude with proposals for terminological unification and differentiation of both legal protection figures.Different legislations of Latin American countries and regional legislation are analyzed, as is the case of the Brazil Action Plan, highlighting its inaccuracy. The two advisory opinions of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, OC-21/14, the Pacheco Tineo Family case against the Plurinational State of Bolivia of November 25, 2013, which deals with a pronounced inaccuracy in both institutes when trying to define asylum are also exposed. When in reality it is about refuge. And the last advisory opinion OC-28/18 at the request of the Republic of Ecuador where the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, tries to find a conceptualization and differentiation of both institutes through an integrating and enlightening classification of the functions of both institutes.
{"title":"La ambigüedad en el uso terminológico del asilo y refugio en la región de América Latina y el Caribe","authors":"C. Magallanes","doi":"10.16890/RSTPR.A7.N13.P137","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.16890/RSTPR.A7.N13.P137","url":null,"abstract":"Currently human mobility is increasing, especially driven by reasons that push them to involuntarily migrate through the region, reasons such as the generalized and systematic violence of the Central American countries, the acute crisis of the countries of the region, currently Venezuela , Argentina, Nicaragua, among others, climate change, among other causes, added to this, international refugees from the war in Syria.A human tragedy of unprecedented magnitude, which gives rise to the frequent use of legal institutes of international protection, asylum and refuge, used interchangeably and often imprecisely and even confused, especially in the Latin American and Caribbean region. In Latin America and the Caribbean, depending on the country or the regional regulation in question, both terms are used inaccurately or in synonyms in their domestic legislation, something that is erroneous and that is intended to be evidenced in this work or to conclude with proposals for terminological unification and differentiation of both legal protection figures.Different legislations of Latin American countries and regional legislation are analyzed, as is the case of the Brazil Action Plan, highlighting its inaccuracy. The two advisory opinions of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, OC-21/14, the Pacheco Tineo Family case against the Plurinational State of Bolivia of November 25, 2013, which deals with a pronounced inaccuracy in both institutes when trying to define asylum are also exposed. When in reality it is about refuge. And the last advisory opinion OC-28/18 at the request of the Republic of Ecuador where the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, tries to find a conceptualization and differentiation of both institutes through an integrating and enlightening classification of the functions of both institutes.","PeriodicalId":211591,"journal":{"name":"Rev. secr. Trib. perm. revis.","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116979349","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-03-30DOI: 10.16890/RSTPR.A7.N13.P57
Lorenza Sebesta
The article examines how European integration, in its early stages (1957-1989), participated in a modernizing humanist and statist koine that, despite the existence of the Cold War and of taking different political forms, extended to both blocks. The contents of this koine are explored, as well as its historical and theoretical origins, according to the enlightening suggestions of the French philosopher Alexandre Kojeve, who identified the end of history in the “fusion” between Marx and Ford -not between liberal democracy and capitalism-. What guaranteed peace and welfare to Europe in the period covered by the article was not its integration understood as a network of formal institutions, norms and abstract values, but a common form of governance inspired by a certain political motto, in a realistic utopia formed by the most prized acquisitions of the liberal and Marxist traditions.
{"title":"Proceso de integración europea y koiné modernizadora: una mirada alternativa al “fin de la historia”","authors":"Lorenza Sebesta","doi":"10.16890/RSTPR.A7.N13.P57","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.16890/RSTPR.A7.N13.P57","url":null,"abstract":"The article examines how European integration, in its early stages (1957-1989), participated in a modernizing humanist and statist koine that, despite the existence of the Cold War and of taking different political forms, extended to both blocks. The contents of this koine are explored, as well as its historical and theoretical origins, according to the enlightening suggestions of the French philosopher Alexandre Kojeve, who identified the end of history in the “fusion” between Marx and Ford -not between liberal democracy and capitalism-. What guaranteed peace and welfare to Europe in the period covered by the article was not its integration understood as a network of formal institutions, norms and abstract values, but a common form of governance inspired by a certain political motto, in a realistic utopia formed by the most prized acquisitions of the liberal and Marxist traditions.","PeriodicalId":211591,"journal":{"name":"Rev. secr. Trib. perm. revis.","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134006413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-03-30DOI: 10.16890/RSTPR.A7.N13.P120
Tomás Mariano Guisado Litterio
Mientras que el texto en ingles del Estatuto de la Corte Internacional de Justicia utiliza genericamente el termino “dispute”, la version espanola reserva la palabra “desacuerdo” para los casos de interpretacion de fallos, utilizando el vocablo “controversia” en otras oportunidades. Esta distincion puede implicar distintos estandares que la Corte ha de emplear para determinar la existencia o no de una diferencia de grado suficiente entre las partes como para encontrarse competente frente a un caso. El presente articulo tendra por objeto desentranar esta cuestion, guiandose por lo resuelto en la decision de la CIJ sobre la interpretacion del fallo dictado en el caso “Avena”, y por otras resoluciones de la Corte y de otros tribunales, a la luz de los principios generales sobre interpretacion de tratados.
{"title":"La diferencia entre una “controversia” y un “desacuerdo” en el Estatuto de la Corte Internacional de Justicia","authors":"Tomás Mariano Guisado Litterio","doi":"10.16890/RSTPR.A7.N13.P120","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.16890/RSTPR.A7.N13.P120","url":null,"abstract":"Mientras que el texto en ingles del Estatuto de la Corte Internacional de Justicia utiliza genericamente el termino “dispute”, la version espanola reserva la palabra “desacuerdo” para los casos de interpretacion de fallos, utilizando el vocablo “controversia” en otras oportunidades. Esta distincion puede implicar distintos estandares que la Corte ha de emplear para determinar la existencia o no de una diferencia de grado suficiente entre las partes como para encontrarse competente frente a un caso. El presente articulo tendra por objeto desentranar esta cuestion, guiandose por lo resuelto en la decision de la CIJ sobre la interpretacion del fallo dictado en el caso “Avena”, y por otras resoluciones de la Corte y de otros tribunales, a la luz de los principios generales sobre interpretacion de tratados.","PeriodicalId":211591,"journal":{"name":"Rev. secr. Trib. perm. revis.","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125252564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-03-30DOI: 10.16890/RSTPR.A7.N13.P180
Liliana Etel Rapallini
The assignment of credits in the international sphere responds primarily to business requirements in pursuit of its cross-border expansionThe assignment of credit is that legal transaction by which a creditor (transferor) transmits to another person (assignee) the rights that the former holds in front of third party, alien to the transfer, but that becomes the debtor of the new creditor without that the primitive relationship is extinguished. In the present delivery I try to expose the subject from two different but closely related edges such as the conflictual, pure technique of Private International Law, and that which aims to achieve uniformity of normative regime pretension in dispute between coding with “hard law” modality “Or soft law”.
{"title":"La cesión internacional de créditos entre el derecho uniforme y el conflictual","authors":"Liliana Etel Rapallini","doi":"10.16890/RSTPR.A7.N13.P180","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.16890/RSTPR.A7.N13.P180","url":null,"abstract":"The assignment of credits in the international sphere responds primarily to business requirements in pursuit of its cross-border expansionThe assignment of credit is that legal transaction by which a creditor (transferor) transmits to another person (assignee) the rights that the former holds in front of third party, alien to the transfer, but that becomes the debtor of the new creditor without that the primitive relationship is extinguished. In the present delivery I try to expose the subject from two different but closely related edges such as the conflictual, pure technique of Private International Law, and that which aims to achieve uniformity of normative regime pretension in dispute between coding with “hard law” modality “Or soft law”.","PeriodicalId":211591,"journal":{"name":"Rev. secr. Trib. perm. revis.","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115280814","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：