{"title":"Z Archiwum Kobiet Rec.: Bronisława Waligórska, Listy z cytadeli 1886. Ancilla libri Monika Rudaś-Grodzka. Warszawa 2018. Seria \"Archiwum Kobiet\". [T. 1]","authors":"D. Zawadzka","doi":"10.18318/pl.2020.4.17","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18318/pl.2020.4.17","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":213870,"journal":{"name":"Pamiętnik Literacki","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114434525","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Carmina (1781), Wiersze ( Poems , 1783), Poezyje ( Poetry , 1787) and pieces from Rękopis puławski (Manuscript of puławy, 1794–1796). The researcher points at numerous connections between the in dividual pieces, examines the modes of grouping them into lyrical cycles, discusses the functions of lyrical subject, intertextual relations, references to ancient literature, and, first and foremost, to jan Kochanowski (especially his Treny á Laments ñ and Muza á The Muse ñ both of which Kniaźnin translated into the latin language). Fieguth’s most crucial achievement is viewing Kniaźnin’s polish and latin output as a whole independent of language (polish and latin) and having common features, but also intermingling in many ways. Fieguth appreciates both the latin volume of Kniaźnin as well as Poems from the year 1783 that include the first editing of Żale Orfeusza nad Eurydyką ( Laments of Orpheus for Eurydice ), the cycle that from that moment became most vital part of composing subsequent editions of Kniaźnin’s poetry until the last one written down at the twilight of the poet’s conscious life. important observations are also included in reference to the two last collections, namely Poezyje ( Poetry ) and poems from the Manuscript of puławy. Abstract The review discusses Tomasz chachulski’s book on the editing of the texts of the enlightenment. it consists of 14 essays referring to the 18 th century literary culture and poetry and are arranged into three thematic parts, namely Szukanie kształtu ( Looking for shape ), Szukanie sensów ( Looking for sense ), and Szukanie źródeł ( Looking for source ). in the reviewer’s assessment, analysing the history of indi vidual piece editions, chachulski proves that not only in theory, but also in practice, editing may be presently understood as a literary history.
{"title":"Edytorstwo jako historia literatury. Rec.: Tomasz Chachulski, Edytorstwo jako historia literatury i inne studia o poezji XVIII wieku. Warszawa 2019","authors":"A. Wdowik","doi":"10.18318/pl.2020.1.15","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18318/pl.2020.1.15","url":null,"abstract":"Carmina (1781), Wiersze ( Poems , 1783), Poezyje ( Poetry , 1787) and pieces from Rękopis puławski (Manuscript of puławy, 1794–1796). The researcher points at numerous connections between the in dividual pieces, examines the modes of grouping them into lyrical cycles, discusses the functions of lyrical subject, intertextual relations, references to ancient literature, and, first and foremost, to jan Kochanowski (especially his Treny á Laments ñ and Muza á The Muse ñ both of which Kniaźnin translated into the latin language). Fieguth’s most crucial achievement is viewing Kniaźnin’s polish and latin output as a whole independent of language (polish and latin) and having common features, but also intermingling in many ways. Fieguth appreciates both the latin volume of Kniaźnin as well as Poems from the year 1783 that include the first editing of Żale Orfeusza nad Eurydyką ( Laments of Orpheus for Eurydice ), the cycle that from that moment became most vital part of composing subsequent editions of Kniaźnin’s poetry until the last one written down at the twilight of the poet’s conscious life. important observations are also included in reference to the two last collections, namely Poezyje ( Poetry ) and poems from the Manuscript of puławy. Abstract The review discusses Tomasz chachulski’s book on the editing of the texts of the enlightenment. it consists of 14 essays referring to the 18 th century literary culture and poetry and are arranged into three thematic parts, namely Szukanie kształtu ( Looking for shape ), Szukanie sensów ( Looking for sense ), and Szukanie źródeł ( Looking for source ). in the reviewer’s assessment, analysing the history of indi vidual piece editions, chachulski proves that not only in theory, but also in practice, editing may be presently understood as a literary history.","PeriodicalId":213870,"journal":{"name":"Pamiętnik Literacki","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114475825","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
PIOTR BOGALECKI University of Silesia, Katowice ORCID: 0000-0002-6527-9765 “UKRYTY PŁONĘ [I BURN IN HIDING]” ON BOLESŁAW LEŚMIAN’S CYCLE “Z KSIĘGI PRZECZUĆ” (“FROM THE BOOK OF PREMONITIONS”) The paper is an analysis and interpretation of a nine-part Bolesław Leśmian’s poetic cycle Z księgi przeczuć (From the Book of Premonitions), published in 1902 in “Chimera”, and of a few other early pieces by the poet. Starting with Epilog (Epilogue) that completes the collection in which the speaking subject compares himself to God burning “on Sinai,” the author analyses the light motives present in the cycle, which leads to validate the opinion of Anna Czabanowska-Wróbel who states that Leśmian was inspired by Jewish mysticism, and to particularise this stance with Marranism (the poet at the age of nine converted with his father) and with a post-secular reflection upon secularising. The paper suggests two modes of reading of the cycle, namely a linear one in which it is viewed as a narration on identity transformation, and a concentric one in the light of which its central thought hidden topic is the problem of forgetting and changing name.
PIOTR BOGALECKI西里西亚大学，卡托维兹ORCID: 0000-0002-6527-9765“UKRYTY PŁONĘ [I BURN IN HIDING]”关于BOLESŁAW LEŚMIAN的周期“Z KSIĘGI PRZECZUĆ”(“FROM THE BOOK of PREMONITIONS”)本文分析和解释了一个九部分Bolesław Leśmian的诗歌周期Z księgi przeczuki (FROM THE BOOK of PREMONITIONS)，出版于1902年的“奇美拉”，以及诗人的其他一些早期作品。从结语(尾声)开始，在结语中，说话的主题将自己比作“在西奈”燃烧的上帝，作者分析了这个循环中出现的轻动机，这导致了安娜Czabanowska-Wróbel的观点，她说Leśmian是受到犹太神秘主义的启发，并将这种立场与马拉主义(诗人九岁时随父亲皈依)和对世俗化的后世俗反思相结合。本文提出了两种阅读模式，一种是线性阅读模式，将其视为身份转换的叙述;另一种是同心阅读模式，其中心思想隐藏主题是遗忘与改名问题。
{"title":"\"Ukryty płonę\". O cyklu \"Z księgi przeczuć\" Bolesława Leśmiana","authors":"Piotr Bogalecki","doi":"10.18318/pl.2023.1.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18318/pl.2023.1.2","url":null,"abstract":"PIOTR BOGALECKI University of Silesia, Katowice ORCID: 0000-0002-6527-9765 “UKRYTY PŁONĘ [I BURN IN HIDING]” ON BOLESŁAW LEŚMIAN’S CYCLE “Z KSIĘGI PRZECZUĆ” (“FROM THE BOOK OF PREMONITIONS”) The paper is an analysis and interpretation of a nine-part Bolesław Leśmian’s poetic cycle Z księgi przeczuć (From the Book of Premonitions), published in 1902 in “Chimera”, and of a few other early pieces by the poet. Starting with Epilog (Epilogue) that completes the collection in which the speaking subject compares himself to God burning “on Sinai,” the author analyses the light motives present in the cycle, which leads to validate the opinion of Anna Czabanowska-Wróbel who states that Leśmian was inspired by Jewish mysticism, and to particularise this stance with Marranism (the poet at the age of nine converted with his father) and with a post-secular reflection upon secularising. The paper suggests two modes of reading of the cycle, namely a linear one in which it is viewed as a narration on identity transformation, and a concentric one in the light of which its central thought hidden topic is the problem of forgetting and changing name.","PeriodicalId":213870,"journal":{"name":"Pamiętnik Literacki","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128318261","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Norwid i sztandary. Przyczynki do interpretacji i historii recepcji wiersza \"Żydowie polscy\" - dwugłos","authors":"Anita Jarzyna, Katarzyna Kuczyńska-Koschany","doi":"10.18318/pl.2021.3.9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18318/pl.2021.3.9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":213870,"journal":{"name":"Pamiętnik Literacki","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128394216","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Maria Bujnicka (8 maja 1944 - 21 marca 2022). Prekursorka badań nad romansem popularnym","authors":"Marta Tomczok, Dobrosława Wężowicz-Ziółkowska","doi":"10.18318/pl.2022.3.18","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18318/pl.2022.3.18","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":213870,"journal":{"name":"Pamiętnik Literacki","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130673589","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
ANETA MAZUR University of Opole ORCID: 0000-0002-8850-3571 WŁADYSŁAW BOGUSŁAWSKI’S LITERARY CREATIVITY—“A SECOND RATE CASE”? The paper describes the literary creativity of Władysław Bogusławski (1838—1909), an distinguished theatre critic (theorist) and a deserving literary critic. Bogusławski was the author of prose pieces produced mainly in 1880s. The most interesting of them—six tales and short stories as well as one dramatic sketch—represent female (feminist) discourse, showing sex relations penetratingly and nonstereotypically: in a psychological-customary, social, anthropological, history-cultural and philosophical context, as well as from the ambivalent proand antiemancipatory stance. Equally interesting and valuable are two autobiographical reminiscences referring to the writer’s stay in exile in Siberia. Finally, there are two minor tales—parables with a philosophical and ethical message. Bogusławski’s thematically and formally diversified prose is characterised by original compositional solutions and aesthetic erudition (e.g. references to music and painting). w którym zabronił rodzinie wydawania swych prac literackich, twierdząc: „[są] chwilowego, przemijającego znaczenia, nie mają doniosłości, która by usprawiedliwiała upamiętnienie ich drukiem” (cyt. za: S e c o m s k a, Władysław Bogusławski – krytyk zapomniany, s. 12). 73 B o g u s ł a w s k i, Estetyka sceniczna, s. 274. 74 B o g u s ł a w s k i, Aktorzy warszawscy, s. 89.
ANETA MAZUR奥波莱大学ORCID: 0000-0002-8850-3571 WŁADYSŁAW BOGUSŁAWSKI的文学创作-“二流的情况下”?本文介绍了杰出的戏剧评论家(理论家)、当之无愧的文学评论家Władysław Bogusławski(1838-1909)的文学创造力。Bogusławski主要创作于19世纪80年代的散文作品。其中最有趣的是——六个故事和短篇小说以及一个戏剧小品——代表了女性(女权主义)话语，在心理习惯、社会、人类学、历史文化和哲学背景下，以及从矛盾的支持和反对解放的立场上，深刻而非刻板地展示了两性关系。同样有趣和有价值的是两篇关于作者在西伯利亚流亡期间的自传式回忆。最后，还有两个小故事——带有哲学和伦理寓意的寓言。Bogusławski的主题和形式多样化的散文的特点是原创的构图解决方案和美学的博学(如参考音乐和绘画)。W którym zabroniowrodzinie wydawania swych prac literackich, twierdząc:“[szoowego, przemijającego znaczenia, nie majedoniosłości, która by usprawiedliwiała upamiętnienie ich drukiem”(cyt)。za: S . c . S . c . S . k . a . Władysław Bogusławski - krytyk zapomniany, S . 12)。[3] [B] [B] [B] [B] [B] [c] [c]。74 . B . B . B . B . B . B . B . B . B . B . B . B . B . B . B . B . B . B . B . B . B。
{"title":"Twórczość literacka Władysława Bogusławskiego – „kwestia podrzędna”?","authors":"A. Mazur","doi":"10.18318/PL.2019.2.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18318/PL.2019.2.2","url":null,"abstract":"ANETA MAZUR University of Opole ORCID: 0000-0002-8850-3571 WŁADYSŁAW BOGUSŁAWSKI’S LITERARY CREATIVITY—“A SECOND RATE CASE”? The paper describes the literary creativity of Władysław Bogusławski (1838—1909), an distinguished theatre critic (theorist) and a deserving literary critic. Bogusławski was the author of prose pieces produced mainly in 1880s. The most interesting of them—six tales and short stories as well as one dramatic sketch—represent female (feminist) discourse, showing sex relations penetratingly and nonstereotypically: in a psychological-customary, social, anthropological, history-cultural and philosophical context, as well as from the ambivalent proand antiemancipatory stance. Equally interesting and valuable are two autobiographical reminiscences referring to the writer’s stay in exile in Siberia. Finally, there are two minor tales—parables with a philosophical and ethical message. Bogusławski’s thematically and formally diversified prose is characterised by original compositional solutions and aesthetic erudition (e.g. references to music and painting). w którym zabronił rodzinie wydawania swych prac literackich, twierdząc: „[są] chwilowego, przemijającego znaczenia, nie mają doniosłości, która by usprawiedliwiała upamiętnienie ich drukiem” (cyt. za: S e c o m s k a, Władysław Bogusławski – krytyk zapomniany, s. 12). 73 B o g u s ł a w s k i, Estetyka sceniczna, s. 274. 74 B o g u s ł a w s k i, Aktorzy warszawscy, s. 89.","PeriodicalId":213870,"journal":{"name":"Pamiętnik Literacki","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123889813","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"\"Największy z duchów Słowiańszczyzny\". Jeszcze o recepcji twórczości Henryka Sienkiewicza w Czechach w latach 1880-1938 (w perspektywie kulturowej)","authors":"Maciej Gloger","doi":"10.18318/pl.2020.3.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18318/pl.2020.3.3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":213870,"journal":{"name":"Pamiętnik Literacki","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124196349","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：