<p>The importance of considering non-motor symptoms (NMS) in the assessment of patients with movement disorders is widely recognized.<span><sup>1</sup></span> In adults, symptoms such as pain, sleep disturbances, anxiety, fatigue, and cognitive dysfunction can be systematically evaluated, sometimes with validated, condition-specific scales.<span><sup>2, 3</sup></span> For example, the Pain in Dystonia Scale (PIDS) has been recently developed for pain assessment across the spectrum of adult-onset isolated dystonia.<span><sup>4</sup></span> In children, however, the evaluation of NMS remains inconsistent, fragmented, and poorly standardized.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Yet, NMS are often disabling and have substantial consequences for the quality of life of children with movement disorders and their families.<span><sup>5</sup></span> In a recent scoping review,<span><sup>6</sup></span> we provide a timely overview of NMS scales used in children with movement disorders, focusing on the three most prevalent conditions, namely dystonia, tics, and cerebral palsy (CP).<span><sup>7-9</sup></span> We identified <i>a large and heterogeneous set of instruments</i> across 382 studies. They were mostly borrowed from neurological conditions typically presenting in adulthood and other pediatric psychiatric conditions, leaving one to wonder whether they have similar accuracy and clinical relevance also in pediatric movement disorders. Here, we advocate for the development of condition-specific, developmentally appropriate, and clinically meaningful tools, and outline key priorities for achieving this goal.</p><p>A major finding of our review was the heterogeneity of NMS assessment tools in children with movement disorders.<span><sup>6</sup></span> Among the included studies, we catalogued more than 500 distinct rating instruments, and only about 60 were used in more than one study. Very few were designed for pediatric movement disorders, and full psychometric validation in the target populations was uncommon (10 studies, 7%). This leads to a paradox. Numerous instruments are available, yet their precision and disease-specific relevance are often uncertain, and disorder-specific NMS scales remain scarce. As a result, clinicians and researchers frequently default to generic measures rather than condition-sensitive tools.</p><p>For example, in the domain of sleep, 13 distinct tools were used across 24 studies, predominantly parent-reported questionnaires such as the Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ), the Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children (SDSC), and the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ), together with objective methods (actigraphy, polysomnography).<span><sup>10-12</sup></span> Questionnaires based on child self-report appeared only sporadically (eg, Insomnia Severity Index),<span><sup>13</sup></span> and clinician-administered tools were rare and mainly cited in reviews (eg, bedtime issues, excessive daytime sleepiness, awakenings, regularity/duration
{"title":"Non-motor Symptom Scales in Pediatric Movement Disorders: A Call for Diagnostic-Specific Tools","authors":"Clément Desjardins MD, MSc, Christelle Nilles MD, Hortensia Gimeno PhD, Kathryn J. Peall MD, PhD, Davide Martino MD, PhD, Tamara Pringsheim MD, PhD, Emmanuel Roze MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/mds.70122","DOIUrl":"10.1002/mds.70122","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The importance of considering non-motor symptoms (NMS) in the assessment of patients with movement disorders is widely recognized.<span><sup>1</sup></span> In adults, symptoms such as pain, sleep disturbances, anxiety, fatigue, and cognitive dysfunction can be systematically evaluated, sometimes with validated, condition-specific scales.<span><sup>2, 3</sup></span> For example, the Pain in Dystonia Scale (PIDS) has been recently developed for pain assessment across the spectrum of adult-onset isolated dystonia.<span><sup>4</sup></span> In children, however, the evaluation of NMS remains inconsistent, fragmented, and poorly standardized.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Yet, NMS are often disabling and have substantial consequences for the quality of life of children with movement disorders and their families.<span><sup>5</sup></span> In a recent scoping review,<span><sup>6</sup></span> we provide a timely overview of NMS scales used in children with movement disorders, focusing on the three most prevalent conditions, namely dystonia, tics, and cerebral palsy (CP).<span><sup>7-9</sup></span> We identified <i>a large and heterogeneous set of instruments</i> across 382 studies. They were mostly borrowed from neurological conditions typically presenting in adulthood and other pediatric psychiatric conditions, leaving one to wonder whether they have similar accuracy and clinical relevance also in pediatric movement disorders. Here, we advocate for the development of condition-specific, developmentally appropriate, and clinically meaningful tools, and outline key priorities for achieving this goal.</p><p>A major finding of our review was the heterogeneity of NMS assessment tools in children with movement disorders.<span><sup>6</sup></span> Among the included studies, we catalogued more than 500 distinct rating instruments, and only about 60 were used in more than one study. Very few were designed for pediatric movement disorders, and full psychometric validation in the target populations was uncommon (10 studies, 7%). This leads to a paradox. Numerous instruments are available, yet their precision and disease-specific relevance are often uncertain, and disorder-specific NMS scales remain scarce. As a result, clinicians and researchers frequently default to generic measures rather than condition-sensitive tools.</p><p>For example, in the domain of sleep, 13 distinct tools were used across 24 studies, predominantly parent-reported questionnaires such as the Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ), the Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children (SDSC), and the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ), together with objective methods (actigraphy, polysomnography).<span><sup>10-12</sup></span> Questionnaires based on child self-report appeared only sporadically (eg, Insomnia Severity Index),<span><sup>13</sup></span> and clinician-administered tools were rare and mainly cited in reviews (eg, bedtime issues, excessive daytime sleepiness, awakenings, regularity/duration","PeriodicalId":213,"journal":{"name":"Movement Disorders","volume":"41 1","pages":"63-67"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://movementdisorders.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mds.70122","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145498751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marta Camacho, Julia C. Greenland, Alexander R.D. Peattie, Lennart R.B. Spindler, Jonathan Holbrook, Lakmini Kahanawita, Tim D. Fryer, Young T. Hong, Caroline H. Williams‐Gray