Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-06-23DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.4238
Deborah De Moortel, Michelle C Turner, Ella Arensman, Alex Binh Vinh Duc Nguyen, Víctor Gonzalez
{"title":"Improving health-promoting workplaces through interdisciplinary approaches. The example of WISEWORK-C, a cluster of five work and health projects within Horizon-Europe.","authors":"Deborah De Moortel, Michelle C Turner, Ella Arensman, Alex Binh Vinh Duc Nguyen, Víctor Gonzalez","doi":"10.5271/sjweh.4238","DOIUrl":"10.5271/sjweh.4238","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":21528,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","volume":" ","pages":"259-264"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12278300/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144476600","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-04-24DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.4226
Igor Burstyn, George Luta
{"title":"Advice on better utilization of validation data to adjust odds ratios for differential exposure misclassification (recall bias).","authors":"Igor Burstyn, George Luta","doi":"10.5271/sjweh.4226","DOIUrl":"10.5271/sjweh.4226","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":21528,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","volume":" ","pages":"344-346"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12282599/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144014787","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-04-24DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.4232
Henrik A Kolstad, Jesper Medom Vestergaard, Jens Peter Bonde, Sadie Costello, Annett Dalbøge, Åse Marie Hansen, Ann Dyreborg Larsen, Anne Helene Garde
{"title":"Response to Drs. Igor Burstyn and George Luta's letter: Advice on better utilization of validation data to adjust odds ratios for differential exposure misclassification (recall bias).","authors":"Henrik A Kolstad, Jesper Medom Vestergaard, Jens Peter Bonde, Sadie Costello, Annett Dalbøge, Åse Marie Hansen, Ann Dyreborg Larsen, Anne Helene Garde","doi":"10.5271/sjweh.4232","DOIUrl":"10.5271/sjweh.4232","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":21528,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","volume":" ","pages":"347-348"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12283147/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143982287","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-01Epub Date: 2025-02-19DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.4212
Maija Paukkunen, Jaro Karppinen, Birgitta Öberg, Leena Ala-Mursula, Eveliina Heikkala, Katja Ryynänen, Riikka Holopainen, Samuel Booth, Neill Booth, Allan Abbott
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the effect of a brief training intervention for occupational health services (OHS) professionals on multiprofessional resource utilization and the costs of biopsychosocial management of patients with low-back pain (LBP) compared to usual care among all participants and those in work disability-based risk groups.
Methods: OHS utilization and back-related sick leave data were collected from electronic patient records over one-year follow-up comparing 232 patients in the intervention arm and 80 control-arm patients, stratified for risk of work disability based on the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire. We estimated costs using linear mixed models by multiplying unit costs (in euros) by each type of OHS resource use (visits to physicians, physiotherapists, nurses, use of imaging) and the number of sick leaves. Estimated mean cost differences with confidence intervals (CI) were reported using bootstrapping to deal with skewed cost data.
Results: The median number of visits to physicians and physiotherapists in the intervention versus control arms was 1 [interquartile range (IQR) 0-3] and 2 (IQR 1-4) versus 2 (IQR 1-3) and 1 (IQR 0-2), respectively. The intervention arm accrued lower physician costs (€-43, 95% CI €-82- -3, P=0.034) and higher physiotherapist costs (€55, 95% CI €26-84, P<0.001) compared to the control arm. There was no statistically significant difference in average total costs between the arms (€-1908, 95% CI €-6734-2919). In the low- and medium-risk groups of work disability, physiotherapist costs were higher in the intervention than control arm, but no statistically significant differences were observed between the arms in the total resource utilization or sickness absence costs.
Conclusions: Brief biopsychosocial training may support shifting OHS resources towards multiprofessional physiotherapist-driven care, instead of solely physician-driven care, for management of patients with LBP in differing risk groups of work disability with no substantial differences in total costs.
{"title":"Cost analysis comparing guideline-oriented biopsychosocial management to usual care for low-back pain: a cluster-randomized trial in occupational health primary care.","authors":"Maija Paukkunen, Jaro Karppinen, Birgitta Öberg, Leena Ala-Mursula, Eveliina Heikkala, Katja Ryynänen, Riikka Holopainen, Samuel Booth, Neill Booth, Allan Abbott","doi":"10.5271/sjweh.4212","DOIUrl":"10.5271/sjweh.4212","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the effect of a brief training intervention for occupational health services (OHS) professionals on multiprofessional resource utilization and the costs of biopsychosocial management of patients with low-back pain (LBP) compared to usual care among all participants and those in work disability-based risk groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>OHS utilization and back-related sick leave data were collected from electronic patient records over one-year follow-up comparing 232 patients in the intervention arm and 80 control-arm patients, stratified for risk of work disability based on the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire. We estimated costs using linear mixed models by multiplying unit costs (in euros) by each type of OHS resource use (visits to physicians, physiotherapists, nurses, use of imaging) and the number of sick leaves. Estimated mean cost differences with confidence intervals (CI) were reported using bootstrapping to deal with skewed cost data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median number of visits to physicians and physiotherapists in the intervention versus control arms was 1 [interquartile range (IQR) 0-3] and 2 (IQR 1-4) versus 2 (IQR 1-3) and 1 (IQR 0-2), respectively. The intervention arm accrued lower physician costs (€-43, 95% CI €-82- -3, P=0.034) and higher physiotherapist costs (€55, 95% CI €26-84, P<0.001) compared to the control arm. There was no statistically significant difference in average total costs between the arms (€-1908, 95% CI €-6734-2919). In the low- and medium-risk groups of work disability, physiotherapist costs were higher in the intervention than control arm, but no statistically significant differences were observed between the arms in the total resource utilization or sickness absence costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Brief biopsychosocial training may support shifting OHS resources towards multiprofessional physiotherapist-driven care, instead of solely physician-driven care, for management of patients with LBP in differing risk groups of work disability with no substantial differences in total costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":21528,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","volume":" ","pages":"201-213"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12070492/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143459480","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-01Epub Date: 2025-01-15DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.4207
Christian Tolstrup Wester, Stavros Kyriakidis, Anders Dreyer Frost, Charlotte Diana Nørregaard Rasmussen, Andreas Holtermann, David M Hallman
Objectives: The growing care demands of an aging population and a smaller workforce is a big societal problem. Therefore, knowledge on how to organize eldercare work without hampering workers` health is needed. We aimed to investigate if workers` daily number of residents cared for over 14 months is associated with low-back pain in eldercare workers.
Methods: We included 513 eldercare workers from 122 wards. In each ward, we gathered quarterly data over 14 months on the number of residents, workers, and work schedules and calculated the daily numbers of residents each worker cared for. Workers reported intensity and days with low-back pain via monthly text messages over 14 months. Using generalized linear mixed models adjusted for confounders, we investigated the association between the number of residents workers cared for daily and low-back pain among those workers.
Results: In 3-month periods over 14 months, caring for ≥1 resident per day was associated with a 4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.07] increased risk of more days with low-back pain, and a 2% (95% CI 1.00-1.03) increase in low-back pain intensity among workers.
Conclusions: Eldercare workers are at a higher risk of experiencing low-back pain during periods when they care for a greater number of residents each day. Maintaining a consistent number of residents and workload for workers over a 14-month period could serve as an effective organizational strategy to prevent low-back pain.
目的:人口老龄化和劳动力减少带来的日益增长的护理需求是一个重大的社会问题。因此,需要了解如何在不妨碍工人健康的情况下组织老年护理工作。我们的目的是调查工人每天照顾超过14个月的住院人数是否与老年护理工人的腰痛有关。方法:对122个病区的513名老年护理人员进行调查。在每个病房,我们收集了超过14个月的住院人数、工人人数和工作时间表的季度数据,并计算了每个工人每天照顾的住院人数。在14个月的时间里,工人们通过每月发短信的方式报告腰痛的强度和天数。使用调整混杂因素的广义线性混合模型,我们调查了日常护理的住院工人数量与这些工人腰痛之间的关系。结果:在超过14个月的3个月期间,每天照顾≥1名居民与腰痛天数增加4%[95%置信区间(CI) 1.02-1.07]相关,腰痛强度增加2% (95% CI 1.00-1.03)。结论:当老年护理人员每天照顾更多的居民时,他们经历腰痛的风险更高。在14个月的时间里,保持住院病人的数量和工人的工作量一致,可以作为一种有效的组织策略来预防腰痛。
{"title":"Organizational strategies of eldercare work and health - Is the daily number of residents cared for over 14 months associated with back pain?","authors":"Christian Tolstrup Wester, Stavros Kyriakidis, Anders Dreyer Frost, Charlotte Diana Nørregaard Rasmussen, Andreas Holtermann, David M Hallman","doi":"10.5271/sjweh.4207","DOIUrl":"10.5271/sjweh.4207","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The growing care demands of an aging population and a smaller workforce is a big societal problem. Therefore, knowledge on how to organize eldercare work without hampering workers` health is needed. We aimed to investigate if workers` daily number of residents cared for over 14 months is associated with low-back pain in eldercare workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 513 eldercare workers from 122 wards. In each ward, we gathered quarterly data over 14 months on the number of residents, workers, and work schedules and calculated the daily numbers of residents each worker cared for. Workers reported intensity and days with low-back pain via monthly text messages over 14 months. Using generalized linear mixed models adjusted for confounders, we investigated the association between the number of residents workers cared for daily and low-back pain among those workers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 3-month periods over 14 months, caring for ≥1 resident per day was associated with a 4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.07] increased risk of more days with low-back pain, and a 2% (95% CI 1.00-1.03) increase in low-back pain intensity among workers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Eldercare workers are at a higher risk of experiencing low-back pain during periods when they care for a greater number of residents each day. Maintaining a consistent number of residents and workload for workers over a 14-month period could serve as an effective organizational strategy to prevent low-back pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":21528,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","volume":" ","pages":"191-200"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067635/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142984789","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-01Epub Date: 2025-03-10DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.4214
Annett Dalbøge, Henrik Albert Kolstad, Alexander Jahn, Charlotte Suppli Ulrik, David Lee Sherson, Harald William Meyer, Niels Ebbehøj, Torben Sigsgaard, Xaver Baur, Vivi Schlünssen
Objective: The aim of this systematic review was to identify, evaluate, and synthesize the relation between ten potential occupational sensitizing exposure groups and asthma.
Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in three databases for peer-reviewed articles published between July 2011 and March 2023. Exposures included ten potential occupational sensitizing exposure groups (amines, anhydrides, biocides [eg, pesticides], crustaceans, enzymes, mammals, metals, "mold, fungi and yeast", molluscs, and other chemicals [eg, cleaning agents]) classified as having no or limited evidence of a causal relation with asthma in our previous overview of systematic reviews. We included observational and case studies. Study selection, data extraction, risk of bias assessment, and evidence level evaluation were conducted independently by two reviewers, who also upgraded or downgraded the level of evidence found in our overview.
Results: This review included 55 articles. The overall confidence in study results was rated high in 8, moderate in 18, and low in 29 studies. No new studies were found for molluscs. For the remaining exposures, we upgraded main groups of crustaceans and enzymes to moderate evidence, mammals and metals to limited/contradictory, and amines and biocides to very limited/contradictory. For subgroups/specific exposures, pesticides, cleaning agents - such as chloramine and disinfection products - and an unspecified group of other chemicals, specifically acrylates and epoxy, were upgraded to moderate.
Conclusion: New occupational sensitizing exposures with moderate evidence include crustaceans, enzymes, pesticides, cleaning agents such as chloramine and disinfection products, and chemicals such as acrylates and epoxy.
{"title":"A systematic review of the relation between ten potential occupational sensitizing exposures and asthma.","authors":"Annett Dalbøge, Henrik Albert Kolstad, Alexander Jahn, Charlotte Suppli Ulrik, David Lee Sherson, Harald William Meyer, Niels Ebbehøj, Torben Sigsgaard, Xaver Baur, Vivi Schlünssen","doi":"10.5271/sjweh.4214","DOIUrl":"10.5271/sjweh.4214","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this systematic review was to identify, evaluate, and synthesize the relation between ten potential occupational sensitizing exposure groups and asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted in three databases for peer-reviewed articles published between July 2011 and March 2023. Exposures included ten potential occupational sensitizing exposure groups (amines, anhydrides, biocides [eg, pesticides], crustaceans, enzymes, mammals, metals, \"mold, fungi and yeast\", molluscs, and other chemicals [eg, cleaning agents]) classified as having no or limited evidence of a causal relation with asthma in our previous overview of systematic reviews. We included observational and case studies. Study selection, data extraction, risk of bias assessment, and evidence level evaluation were conducted independently by two reviewers, who also upgraded or downgraded the level of evidence found in our overview.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review included 55 articles. The overall confidence in study results was rated high in 8, moderate in 18, and low in 29 studies. No new studies were found for molluscs. For the remaining exposures, we upgraded main groups of crustaceans and enzymes to moderate evidence, mammals and metals to limited/contradictory, and amines and biocides to very limited/contradictory. For subgroups/specific exposures, pesticides, cleaning agents - such as chloramine and disinfection products - and an unspecified group of other chemicals, specifically acrylates and epoxy, were upgraded to moderate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>New occupational sensitizing exposures with moderate evidence include crustaceans, enzymes, pesticides, cleaning agents such as chloramine and disinfection products, and chemicals such as acrylates and epoxy.</p>","PeriodicalId":21528,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","volume":" ","pages":"146-158"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12047181/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143586441","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-01Epub Date: 2025-03-17DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.4220
Helena Breth Nielsen, Camilla Sandal Sejbaek, Lene Wohlfahrt Dreyer, Ida E H Madsen, Esben Meulengracht Flachs, Karin Sørig Hougaard
Objectives: This population-based cohort study examined the association between psychosocial work environment exposures and autoimmune rheumatic diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic sclerosis (SS), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
Methods: The total Danish working population, 19-58 years of age (N=2 319 337) was followed from 1997-2018 (37 529 977 person years). Quantitative demands, decision authority, emotional demands, job insecurity, physical violence, role conflicts and possibilities for development at work, as well as a combined psychosocial index were assessed by job-exposure matrices (JEM) and linked with diagnoses of autoimmune rheumatic diseases, ie, RA, SS, and SLE identified in The Danish National Patient Registry. For each psychosocial work environment exposure, recent exposure, accumulated exposure, and number of years with high exposure level were calculated for every employee. Associations with autoimmune rheumatic diseases were assessed by Poisson regression analyses.
Results: The results show that employees in occupations with higher decision authority and, to some degree, possibilities for development at work, have lower risks of autoimmune rheumatic diseases, while employment in occupations with high risk of physical violence involves a higher risk of rheumatoid arthritis. No association was observed for job insecurity or role conflicts at work. The results on quantitative demands, emotional demands and the psychosocial index were less conclusive.
Conclusion: These findings generally do not support that psychosocial work environment exposures are major risk factors for autoimmune rheumatic diseases, but low decision authority, possibilities for development at work, physical violence and possibly the sum of recent adverse psychosocial exposure may be of importance.
{"title":"Occupational history of psychosocial work environment exposures and risk of autoimmune rheumatic diseases - a Danish register-based cohort study.","authors":"Helena Breth Nielsen, Camilla Sandal Sejbaek, Lene Wohlfahrt Dreyer, Ida E H Madsen, Esben Meulengracht Flachs, Karin Sørig Hougaard","doi":"10.5271/sjweh.4220","DOIUrl":"10.5271/sjweh.4220","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This population-based cohort study examined the association between psychosocial work environment exposures and autoimmune rheumatic diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic sclerosis (SS), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The total Danish working population, 19-58 years of age (N=2 319 337) was followed from 1997-2018 (37 529 977 person years). Quantitative demands, decision authority, emotional demands, job insecurity, physical violence, role conflicts and possibilities for development at work, as well as a combined psychosocial index were assessed by job-exposure matrices (JEM) and linked with diagnoses of autoimmune rheumatic diseases, ie, RA, SS, and SLE identified in The Danish National Patient Registry. For each psychosocial work environment exposure, recent exposure, accumulated exposure, and number of years with high exposure level were calculated for every employee. Associations with autoimmune rheumatic diseases were assessed by Poisson regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results show that employees in occupations with higher decision authority and, to some degree, possibilities for development at work, have lower risks of autoimmune rheumatic diseases, while employment in occupations with high risk of physical violence involves a higher risk of rheumatoid arthritis. No association was observed for job insecurity or role conflicts at work. The results on quantitative demands, emotional demands and the psychosocial index were less conclusive.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings generally do not support that psychosocial work environment exposures are major risk factors for autoimmune rheumatic diseases, but low decision authority, possibilities for development at work, physical violence and possibly the sum of recent adverse psychosocial exposure may be of importance.</p>","PeriodicalId":21528,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","volume":" ","pages":"226-236"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12071186/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143650038","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-01Epub Date: 2025-04-22DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.4233
Ute Bültmann, Cécile R L Boot
{"title":"Peer review: Together we can make it work.","authors":"Ute Bültmann, Cécile R L Boot","doi":"10.5271/sjweh.4233","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.4233","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":21528,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","volume":"51 3","pages":"131-133"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12046636/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144019494","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-01Epub Date: 2024-12-20DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.4201
Ceciel H Heijkants, Madelon L M van Hooff, Astrid de Wind, Sabine A E Geurts, Cécile R L Boot
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate one-year effects of a team-level participatory workplace intervention on need for recovery and satisfaction of the needs for autonomy, competence and relatedness among long-term care workers by means of a randomized controlled trial.
Methods: Teams of long-term care workers were randomly assigned to the intervention group (ten teams; N=78) or the wait-list control group (ten teams; N=58). The intervention consisted of a problem inventory, related to the needs for autonomy, competence and relatedness, a brainstorm towards solutions and an action plan divided over three meetings guided by a facilitator. The primary outcome was need for recovery and secondary outcomes were the satisfaction of the needs for autonomy, competence and relatedness. Outcomes were measured at baseline and after 6, 9 and 12 months. Linear mixed model analyses were performed in R.
Results: There was no significant difference in need for recovery between groups over time. The intervention group did show a slight improvement of the satisfaction of the need for relatedness over time, while in contrast, the control group showed a decrease over time. The satisfaction of the need for autonomy and competence did not significantly differ between both groups over time.
Conclusions: The approach had no significant effect on the primary outcome need for recovery. The intervention did have a significant positive impact on the satisfaction of the need for relatedness, possibly because, after a period of being unable to be close, it provided opportunity to gather and work together as a team.
{"title":"Effectiveness of a team-level participatory approach aimed at improving sustainable employability among long-term care workers: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Ceciel H Heijkants, Madelon L M van Hooff, Astrid de Wind, Sabine A E Geurts, Cécile R L Boot","doi":"10.5271/sjweh.4201","DOIUrl":"10.5271/sjweh.4201","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate one-year effects of a team-level participatory workplace intervention on need for recovery and satisfaction of the needs for autonomy, competence and relatedness among long-term care workers by means of a randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Teams of long-term care workers were randomly assigned to the intervention group (ten teams; N=78) or the wait-list control group (ten teams; N=58). The intervention consisted of a problem inventory, related to the needs for autonomy, competence and relatedness, a brainstorm towards solutions and an action plan divided over three meetings guided by a facilitator. The primary outcome was need for recovery and secondary outcomes were the satisfaction of the needs for autonomy, competence and relatedness. Outcomes were measured at baseline and after 6, 9 and 12 months. Linear mixed model analyses were performed in R.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in need for recovery between groups over time. The intervention group did show a slight improvement of the satisfaction of the need for relatedness over time, while in contrast, the control group showed a decrease over time. The satisfaction of the need for autonomy and competence did not significantly differ between both groups over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The approach had no significant effect on the primary outcome need for recovery. The intervention did have a significant positive impact on the satisfaction of the need for relatedness, possibly because, after a period of being unable to be close, it provided opportunity to gather and work together as a team.</p>","PeriodicalId":21528,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","volume":" ","pages":"170-180"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12056369/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142865169","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objectives: This study investigated the association between combined exposures and hyperglycemia incidence, as well as the dose-response relationship between the duration of night work and hyperglycemia among long-term night workers.
Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 12 716 night workers from the nationwide population were recruited. Hyperglycemia incidence was based on the one-year change in fasting blood glucose levels. Occupational noise exposure was defined as exposure to 8-hour time-weighted average sound levels of ≥85 decibels. Personal factors, including body mass index, and work-related factors, like monthly night work duration, were assessed. Multivariable logistic and linear regression models were used to explore the association.
Results: In the multivariate logistic analyses, each additional day of night work was associated with an increased risk of hyperglycemia [adjusted odds ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.07]. In the normal fasting glucose group, each additional day of night work was associated with a linear increase of +0.07% (95% CI +0.03% - +0.12%) in the change in fasting glucose levels, and noise exposure was associated with a linear increase of +1.34% (95% CI +0.55% - +2.12%) increase in fasting glucose levels. Furthermore, the population exposed to noise and working ≥10 days of night work had a significantly higher increase of fasting glucose levels (β +5.71%, 95% CI +4.48% - +6.95%), with significant interaction effects (P for interaction <0.01).
Conclusions: The possible dose-response relationship between duration of night work and changes in fasting glucose levels was found. The combined exposure to night work and noise posed a higher risk for hyperglycemia than exposure to night work alone.
目的:本研究探讨了长期夜班工人联合暴露与高血糖发病率的关系,以及夜班时间与高血糖之间的量效关系。方法:在这项前瞻性队列研究中,从全国人口中招募了12716名夜班工人。高血糖的发生率是基于一年空腹血糖水平的变化。职业性噪声暴露定义为暴露于≥85分贝的8小时时间加权平均声级。对个人因素(包括体重指数)和工作相关因素(如每月夜间工作时长)进行了评估。使用多变量逻辑回归和线性回归模型来探讨这种关联。结果:在多变量logistic分析中,每增加一天夜班与高血糖的风险增加相关[校正优势比1.05,95%可信区间(CI) 1.02-1.07]。在正常空腹血糖组中,每增加一天夜间工作与空腹血糖水平变化线性增加+0.07% (95% CI +0.03% - +0.12%)相关,噪声暴露与空腹血糖水平线性增加+1.34% (95% CI +0.55% - +2.12%)相关。此外,噪声暴露人群和夜间工作≥10天的人群空腹血糖水平升高显著(β +5.71%, 95% CI +4.48% - +6.95%),且存在显著的相互作用效应(P为相互作用)。结论:夜间工作时间与空腹血糖水平变化之间可能存在剂量-反应关系。夜间工作和噪音的联合暴露比单独夜间工作带来更高的高血糖风险。
{"title":"Combined exposure to night work and noise in relation to hyperglycemia among long-term night workers: a nationwide population-based prospective cohort study.","authors":"Po-Ching Chu, Chen-Hsien Lee, Yu-Fang Lee, Joyce Lin, Jui Wang, Jing-Shiang Hwang","doi":"10.5271/sjweh.4215","DOIUrl":"10.5271/sjweh.4215","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigated the association between combined exposures and hyperglycemia incidence, as well as the dose-response relationship between the duration of night work and hyperglycemia among long-term night workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective cohort study, 12 716 night workers from the nationwide population were recruited. Hyperglycemia incidence was based on the one-year change in fasting blood glucose levels. Occupational noise exposure was defined as exposure to 8-hour time-weighted average sound levels of ≥85 decibels. Personal factors, including body mass index, and work-related factors, like monthly night work duration, were assessed. Multivariable logistic and linear regression models were used to explore the association.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the multivariate logistic analyses, each additional day of night work was associated with an increased risk of hyperglycemia [adjusted odds ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.07]. In the normal fasting glucose group, each additional day of night work was associated with a linear increase of +0.07% (95% CI +0.03% - +0.12%) in the change in fasting glucose levels, and noise exposure was associated with a linear increase of +1.34% (95% CI +0.55% - +2.12%) increase in fasting glucose levels. Furthermore, the population exposed to noise and working ≥10 days of night work had a significantly higher increase of fasting glucose levels (β +5.71%, 95% CI +4.48% - +6.95%), with significant interaction effects (P for interaction <0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The possible dose-response relationship between duration of night work and changes in fasting glucose levels was found. The combined exposure to night work and noise posed a higher risk for hyperglycemia than exposure to night work alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":21528,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","volume":" ","pages":"237-246"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12072438/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143586456","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}